Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Clinical governance'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning campaigns
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • Patient Safety Standards
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
    • Data and insight
    • Research
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


First name


Last name


Country


Join a private group (if appropriate)


About me


Organisation


Role

Found 101 results
  1. Content Article
    According to the 2016 US News and World Report (USNWR) ranking, The Mayo Clinic is America’s best hospital. The CEOs are both physicians and the hospital has in fact always been physician-led. In this article, published by The American Association for Physician Leadership, the authors look at why doctors make good managers.
  2. Content Article
    This short and informative guide, produced by the Quality Care Commission, is for services who may be dealing with challenging behaviour. It includes definitions of the different types of restrictive interventions and directs providers to the evidence they need to provide in order to reassure the regulator that such practice is well governed and safe.
  3. Content Article
    In this blog, Jeremy Hunt MP, Founder of Patient Safety Watch, argues against introducing more targets for GPs. The new Health Secretary, Therese Coffey MP, plans to introduce a target to ensure that all patients see their GP within two weeks. The blog highlights two issues with this approach: Setting a new target won’t make it a reality Having too many targets result is a system that depersonalises patients, deprofessionalises frontline staff and means it is difficult for health services to prioritise It then proposes that the health system should learn from the UK education system's approach to regulatory oversight, which is aimed at driving up standards, rather than achieving grades.
  4. Content Article
    Healthcare Inspectorate Wales (HIW) is the independent inspectorate of the NHS and regulator of independent healthcare in Wales. This annual report highlights key findings from HIW's regulation, inspection and review of healthcare services in Wales. It demonstrates how HIW carried out its functions and outlines the number of inspections and quality checks it undertook during 2021-22.
  5. Community Post
    Is it time to change the way England's healthcare system is funded? Is the English system in need of radical structural change at the top? I've been prompted to think about this by the article about the German public health system on the BBC website: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-62986347.amp There are no quick fixes, however we all need to look at this closely. I believe that really 'modernising' / 'transforming' our health & #socialcare systems could 'save the #NHS'. Both for #patients through improved safety, efficiency & accountability, and by making the #NHS an attractive place to work again, providing the NHS Constitution for England is at the heart of changes and is kept up to date. In my experience, having worked in healthcare for the private sector and the NHS, and lived and worked in other countries, we need to open our eyes. At present it could be argued that we have the worst of both worlds in England. A partially privatised health system and a fully privatised social care system. All strung together by poor commissioning and artificial and toxic barriers, such as the need for continuing care assessments. In my view a change, for example to a German-style system, could improve patient safety through empowering the great managers and leaders we have in the NHS. These key people are held back by the current hierarchical crony-ridden system, and we are at risk of losing them. In England we have a system which all too often punishes those who speak out for patients and hides failings behind a web of denial, obfuscation and secrecy, and in doing this fails to learn. Vast swathes of unnecessary bureaucracy and duplication could be eliminated, gaps more easily identified, and greater focus given to deeply involving patients in the delivery of their own care. This is a contentious subject as people have such reverence for the NHS. I respect the values of the NHS and want to keep them; to do this effectively we need much more open discussion on how it is organised and funded. What are people's views?
  6. News Article
    The Independent Healthcare Providers Network (IHPN) have today launched a “refresh” of its Medical Practitioners Assurance Framework (MPAF), designed to further improve the safety and quality of care independent providers deliver to patients. Initially launched in October 2019, the MPAF – led by former National NHS Medical Director Sir Bruce Keogh – contains key principles to strengthen and build upon the medical governance systems already in place in the sector and sets out expected practice in a number of key areas. Care Quality Commission (CQC) now uses the framework’s principles in assessing how well-led an independent service is, with the framework a requirement of the NHS’ 2022/23 Standard Contract which all independent sector providers of NHS-funded care must adhere to. The MPAF was always designed to be a “live document” and today’s refresh strengthens the framework to ensure it remains in-keeping with current best practice in the health system. This includes taking into account recommendations from the Bishop of Norwich’s inquiry into Ian Paterson, as well as Baroness Cumberlege’s Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review (IMMDS). Key areas strengthened in the refresh include giving more prominence to expectations around patient consent, and the need to have greater transparency around conflict of interest declarations. New initiatives such as the Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) service are also reflected in the refreshed framework, as well as an IHPN Development Plan which sets how the network will support providers to continue to implement the MPAF. David Hare, Chief Executive of the Independent Healthcare Providers Network (IHPN) said: “IHPN are delighted to be launching today a new refresh of our Medical Practitioners Assurance Framework (MPAF), reflecting the independent health sector’s commitment to continuously improving the safety and quality of care they deliver to millions of patients every year. “Since the MPAF was launched in 2019, independent healthcare providers – with the support of CQC and NHS England – have really embraced the framework, using it to review and update their practices to further raise the bar in medical leadership in the sector. “With a continued focus amongst the entire healthcare system around improving patient safety and quality, this framework ensures providers adhere to the latest medical governance practices. “This will not only ensure greater consistency around how clinicians work across the independent sector and NHS, but also give confidence to patients that independent healthcare providers are committed to delivering the safest possible care”. Read press release Source: Independent Healthcare Providers Network, 26 September 2022
  7. Content Article
    The Independent Healthcare Providers Network (IHPN) has launched a “refresh” of its Medical Practitioners Assurance Framework (MPAF), designed to further improve the safety and quality of care independent providers deliver to patients. The MPAF – led by former National NHS Medical Director Sir Bruce Keogh – contains key principles to strengthen and build upon the medical governance systems already in place in the sector and sets out expected practice in a number of key areas.
  8. Content Article
    To be effective, clinical governance should reach every level of a healthcare organisation—it requires structures and processes that integrate financial control, service performance and clinical quality in ways that will engage clinicians and generate service improvements. In this article for the BMJ, the authors argue that because clinicians are at the core of clinical work, they must be at the heart of clinical governance. They look at problems with the prevailing model of clinical governance and describe an alternative approach.
  9. Content Article
    This document outlines the terms of reference for the independent review into maternity services at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (NUH), commissioned by NHS England and led by Donna Ockenden. The review has been established in light of significant concerns raised about the quality and safety of maternity services at NUH, and concerns voiced by local families. It replaces a previous regionally-led review after some families expressed concerns and made representations to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. The review began on 1 September 2022 following early engagement with families and NUH from June 2022. It is expected to last 18 months, although this timeframe is subject to review. Learning and recommendations will be shared with NUH as they become apparent, to allow rapid action to improve the safety of maternity care. The only and final report is expected to be published and presented to NUH and NHS England around March 2024.
  10. Content Article
    Despite global consensus that access to pharmaceuticals as a lifesaving commodity is a fundamental human right, 2 billion people globally still lack access to medicines. In this blog, Karrar Karrar, Access to Medicines Adviser at Save the Children, looks at why weak regulatory systems are a major patient safety issue in low- and middle-income countries. He highlights that lack of regulatory capacity results in falsified, substandard and fake medicines making their way into local pharmacies and hospitals. It also delays patient access to new medicines due to lengthy processing times. Karrar argues that governments must prioritise investments in strengthening national regulatory systems and increase cross-country collaboration to strengthen regional and global regulatory networks and systems.
  11. Content Article
    Hospital boards members are charged with developing appropriate organisational strategies and cultures and have an important role to play in safeguarding the care provided by their organisation. However, recent concerns have been raised over boards’ ability to enact their duty to ensure the quality and safety of care. This paper in BMC Health Services Research provides a critical reflection on the relationship between hospital board oversight and patient safety. It highlights new perspectives and suggestions for developing this area of study.
  12. Content Article
    Covid-19 has posed a huge challenge to the delivery of safe care, both when infection rates were at their highest levels and in terms of its long-term impact on health and social care systems.[1] The pandemic has magnified existing patient safety issues, created new ones, and exposed safety gaps which require systemic responses. This month the World Health Organization (WHO) has published a new report, Implications of the Covid-19 pandemic for patient safety: A rapid review.[2] The review aims to create a greater understanding of the impact of the pandemic on patient safety, particularly in relation to diagnostic services, treatment and care management. In this blog, Patient Safety Learning, one of the international organisations who contributed to this review, provides an overview and reflections on some the key themes and issues raised in this review.
  13. Content Article
    Clinical governance can be defined as ‘the framework through which healthcare organisations are accountable for continuously improving the quality of their services and safeguarding high quality of care’. This article aims to provide an introduction to clinical governance based on UK practice. The article defines and examines how UK health systems priorities safe care, effective care, person-centred care and assured care.
  14. Content Article
    This is part of our series of Patient Safety Spotlight interviews, where we talk to people working for patient safety about their role and what motivates them. Claire talks to us about her role as a Patient Safety Lead and why she thinks the new Patient Safety Incident Response Framework will make her work more practical and patient-centred. She also describes why she set up the Patient Safety Management Network and highlights why patient safety roles would benefit from more standardisation across trusts.
  15. Content Article
    The Quality Network for Inpatient Working Age Mental Health Services (QNWA) based within the Royal College of Psychiatrists' Centre for Quality Improvement are pleased to announce the publication of their 8th edition standards. Since the publication of the first edition standards in 2006, the Network has grown to include over 140 members from the NHS and private sector. This new edition of standards aims to reflect the changes in working practices and legislation over the last two years in addition to placing greater emphasis on equality, diversity and inclusion as well as sustainability in inpatient mental health services. The eighth edition standards have been drawn from key documents and expert consensus and have been subject to extensive consultation with professional groups involved in the provision of inpatient mental health services, and with people and carers who have used services in the past.
  16. Event
    This day will explore what clinical governance means for frontline clinicians. Based on experiential learning techniques, drawing on live case studies and shared experiences of the participants, it looks at the challenges that colleagues working in healthcare settings encounter as part of their journey into patient safety and overall clinical governance and what needs to happen to the system safer for the staff and the patients. Working in partnership, this day draws on expertise from the healthcare leaders and front line clinicians from BAPIO. It is grounded in principles of clinical governance which will be brought to life by the diverse experience and skills of the delivery team. The conference is open to anyone working in a health care setting who is involved in leadership role or providing care to patients. For further information and to book your place visit https://www.healthcareconferencesuk.co.uk/conferences-masterclasses/reinvigorating-clinical-governance or email kerry@hc-uk.org.uk. hub members receive a 20% discount. Email info@pslhub.org for discount code. Follow on Twitter @HCUK_Clare #ClinGov
  17. Content Article
    This code sets out a common overarching framework for the corporate governance of trusts, reflecting developments in UK corporate governance and the development of integrated care systems. 
  18. Content Article
    A locally engaged health service can lead to a more open, dynamic and pluralist model of NHS governance and accountability. In weighing up the hopes for better integration and collaboration against concerns around operational pressures, Matthew Taylor, Chief executive of the NHS Confederation, discusses the potential positive impact that local government can have in health service decision-making.
  19. Content Article
    Forty-two Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) in England are set to become new statutory bodies from July 2022, marking a significant shift in how health and care services are planned and delivered towards a model of joined-up partnership working and coordination. At the Health Plus Care conference on the 18 May 2022, Patient Safety Learning's Chief Executive Helen Hughes, Maggie Boyd, Associate Consultant at NHS Arden & GEM Commissioning Support Unit, Sue Braysher, Managing Director at Bluebellwoods Consulting and Graham Hewett, Associate Director of Quality at NHS South East London Clinical Commissioning Group, discussed the development of ICSs in the context of patient safety. They considered the opportunities and challenges that this presents and the need to embed patient safety in the culture, leadership and new governance structures. See attached their presentation slides.
  20. Content Article
    The last two years have been unprecedented for the NHS. The COVID-19 pandemic has presented a unique set of challenges and required innovative new ways of working to provide an effective response. As part of that response, the NHS adopted special payment arrangements for 2020/21 and 2021/22, removed the requirement for trusts to sign formal contracts and disapplied financial sanctions for failure to achieve national standards. The Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) financial incentive scheme was also suspended for the entire period. To support the NHS to achieve its recovery priorities, CQUIN is being reintroduced from 2022/23. This document sets out the requirements for all providers of healthcare services that are commissioned under an NHS Standard Contract (full-length or shorter-form version) and are within the scope of the Aligned Payment and Incentives (API) rules, as set out in the National Tariff and Payment System. These requirements take effect from 1 April 2022.
  21. Content Article
    This animation by The King's Fund explains the changes that are happening to the way the NHS in England is organised and run. It outlines the key organisations that make up the NHS and how they can collaborate to deliver joined-up care. It describes the impact of the Health and Care Act 2022 and talks about how Integrated Care Systems foster collaboration between healthcare and other local services to improve people's experience and health outcomes.
  22. Content Article
    Integrated care systems (ICSs) will gain their full statutory footing in July 2021, after years of development. This blog by The King's Fund aims to explain how ICSs will function and includes a diagram showing the main features and interactions within an ICS. It outlines the roles of the integrated care board (ICB) and integrated care partnership (ICP) in each ICS, and describes the different partnership and delivery structures.
  23. Content Article
    "The inestimable, magnificent, Will Powell speaking on Radio Ombudsman about the long struggle to discover the truth about his son's death and the subsequent failure of accountability mechanisms" - Rob Behrens, Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman UK, Vice-President IOI Europe, Visiting Professor UCL. MCFC.
  24. Content Article
    Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust's Quality Account has been designed to report on the quality of their services in line with regulations. The aim in this report is to describe in a balanced and accessible way of how the Trust provides high-quality clinical care to service users, the local population and commissioners.
  25. Content Article
    The Independent review of maternity services at the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust was commissioned in 2017 to assess the quality of investigations relating to newborn, infant and maternal harm at the Trust. When it commenced this review was of 23 families’ cases, but it has subsequently grown to cover cases of maternity care relating to 1,486 families, the majority of which were patients at the Trust between the years 2000 and 2019. Some families had multiple clinical incidents therefore a total of 1,592 clinical incidents involving mothers and babies have been reviewed with the earliest case from 1973 and the latest from 2020.
×
×
  • Create New...