Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Appointment'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Digital health and care service provision
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Apps for health and care
    • Teleservices
    • Other health and care software
    • Digital health regulatory bodies/standards/guidance
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Patient Safety Alerts
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Transformative Simulation
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • Patient Safety Standards
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


First name


Last name


Country


About me


Organisation


Role

Found 288 results
  1. News Article
    Patients risk having serious conditions missed by doctors working from home under an NHS revolution championed by Wes Streeting. Doctors will deliver millions of virtual hospital appointments at their convenience – and from their own homes – as part of plans to tackle the NHS backlog that Mr Streeting set out when he was health secretary. However, health leaders and patient groups are concerned about patients falling through the cracks and the risk that serious conditions such as cancer could be missed. They also fear the creation of a “two-tier” health system in which the digitally capable are “fast-tracked” while others who are older or more vulnerable are forced to wait longer for care. The new “Online NHS Trust” will be officially formed on 1 June and start seeing patients from October 2027, The Telegraph can disclose. Patients facing some of the longest waits will be the first to test the new service, with the virtual hospital to be piloted on gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology and ophthalmology. Patients referred to a consultant will have the option to connect remotely to one of the specialists across the country via the NHS app – with more specialities and conditions added over time. But concerns gathered by Healthwatch, an official health service body that represents patients, have warned that serious conditions such as cancer could be missed in video calls. And one patient advocate said it was “described as being optional, but in reality, if there is a long waiting list for an in-person appointment, the patient may ‘choose’ the online appointment instead, eg if the GP says it’s a shorter waiting time to get seen online, it is not a fair choice”. Read full story (paywalled) Source: The Telegraph, 18 May 2026
  2. News Article
    GP surgeries are forcing elderly patients to book appointments online, against NHS rules, a survey suggests. As many as one in three people aged 75 or over surveyed by a charity said they were made to submit online forms to see a doctor. This is despite the GP contract requiring all practices to allow patients to book over the phone or in person if they prefer. The NHS says all practices should offer a range of booking methods. There is no evidence that any surgeries have been punished for not following the NHS rules. Critics warned that practices were operating with impunity and “should lose funding” if they were found to be flouting contract requirements. The results are part of a report by Re-engage, a charity fighting loneliness in old age, which said older people were being “dehumanised” and “excluded” by the digital-first approach. The charity’s report, Care On Hold, revealed findings from a survey of 926 older people based on their real-world experiences of accessing GP services. The authors warned that forcing elderly people to book online left them without healthcare appointments. The report also warned that some patients were instead getting help from emergency services, self-treating, or going untreated. Read full story (paywalled) Source: The Telegraph, 4 May 2026
  3. News Article
    A new target for improving patients’ experience of making GP appointments is among three top NHS priorities identified by the prime minister for this year, HSJ has learned. Samantha Jones, permanent secretary at the Department of Health and Social Care, identified the three main objectives for 10 Downing Street for 2026-27 at a recent staff briefing. Two of them match existing commitments: For 70% of patients to be seen within 18 weeks for elective treatment by March 2027; and to begin delivering the “NHS Online” digital health service in 2027. However, the third is new: For at least 80% per cent of patients to report being satisfied with their experience of contacting their GP practice by March 2027. No target was set for this measure in last year’s medium term planning framework, nor in priorities for this year set out by NHS England last month – although it did call for a focus on urgent GP appointments. The measure comes from a monthly Office for National Statistics survey funded by NHSE. Performance has increased over the past 18 months – as most practices have upgraded phone and web booking systems – but the gains have slowed. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 6 May 2026
  4. Content Article
    This report finds that one in three people aged 75 and over can only get to see their doctor if they book digitally, and the same proportion feel they are cut off from care. With nearly 90% of older people still trying to make appointments by phone or in person, Re-engage believes many of them are being cut off from their doctor, which risks increasing their loneliness and isolation. The report calls on UK governments to make accessing GP appointments easier for older people as many practices continue to insist on online bookings only. Key recommendations Embed in NHS digitalisation strategies the right for people to choose between digital or offline access when using health services, ensuring that digitalisation does not replace the option of non‑digital contact. Include in GP contracts a condition that analogue routes remain available by making non‑digital access a protected component of health digitalisation policy, so that no one is required to go online to receive care. Ensure older people are directly involved in shaping digital health policy and service design, so decisions reflect the needs and experiences of those most affected. Centrally collect and publish data from Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) and health boards on both digital and analogue access, broken down by age, gender, disability and ethnicity, to make the impact of digitalisation visible and identify any groups disproportionately affected.
  5. News Article
    It is a revolution that might just save the NHS – and the high street. Imagine being able to have your eyes tested, mole examined or get an appointment with a consultant without going to your local hospital – and maybe fit in some shopping or a cinema visit afterwards. That, increasingly, is what people in Barnsley are doing after an unprecedented relocation of medical services from the district general hospital into a purpose-built outpatients centre in the Alhambra shopping centre, which is getting a new lease of life thanks to the experiment. Those involved say the initiative – the first of its kind in the NHS – is trailblazing and revolutionary. After a recent visit, Wes Streeting, the health secretary, described it as “really inspiring”. He said: “What we’re seeing right here in the heart of Barnsley town centre is the future of the NHS.” The outpatients centre has been created as a result of a collaboration between Barnsley hospital NHS foundation trust and the town’s Labour-run council. Hundreds of people a week are visiting it to have tests or treatment, including minor operations,for example to treat cataracts, blocked tear ducts or ingrowing eyelashes. Soon the number will rise to 1,000 or more. It gives patients easier access to a range of non-urgent services than at the hospital on the town’s outskirts, where parking is limited. Through the extra footfall it is generating, it is also boosting custom for shops, cafes, restaurants and leisure facilities. “It’s about having your mammogram while your husband wanders around at Sports Direct, or meeting your friend for a coffee after a dermatology appointment where someone looked at your rash,” says Michael Brown, the architect who designed the new facility. The outpatient centre’s location is proving a hit with patients, partly because it is a quick walk from the bus and rail station, says Alan Heathcote, Barnsley hospital’s project manager. “Patient feedback has been very positive. And the themes are consistent: easier access, a better location, less walking, shorter waits and no need to battle for hospital parking”, he says. Parking near the Alhambra is plentiful and cheap. The experience of the CDC so far suggests that offering care in a town centre location has helped to reduce “DNAs” – patients who don’t show up – by 24%. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 16 April 2026
  6. Event
    until
    The new NHS online hospital launches in 2027, but what is it and how will it work? Join the Patients Association's free online event on 11th May at 2pm to learn more. NHS Online will give patients with certain conditions the option of having their hospital appointment online. Together we’ll look at what an online NHS hospital means to people, and will discuss the benefits, opportunities, risks, and concerns. Join us if you are a patient, healthcare professional, policy-maker, carer, charity worker, or simply anyone who wants to learn more about this new initiative. Speakers Chair: Rachel Power - Chief Executive, the Patients Association Jonny Brown - Programme Director, NHS England Jacob Lant - Chief Executive, National Voices Patient representative Register
  7. Content Article
    The NHS has seen a 6 percentage point increase in public satisfaction, the first rise since 2019, according to the latest findings from the gold-standard survey of public attitudes to the NHS and social care, analysed by the Nuffield Trust and The King’s Fund and surveyed by NatCen. Key findings Satisfaction with the NHS In 2025, 26% of British adults were ‘very’ or ‘quite’ satisfied with the way in which the NHS runs – a statistically significant 6 percentage point increase from 2024. Around half of respondents (51%) were dissatisfied with the NHS in 2025, a statistically significant fall of 8 percentage points compared to 2024 when it was 59%. This is the first increase in satisfaction since 2019, and the largest fall in dissatisfaction in more than 25 years. People under 35 (20%), supporters of Reform (20%) and people in Wales (18%) were significantly less satisfied with the NHS than the survey average. Despite the increase in satisfaction only 16% of respondents thought the standard of NHS care would improve in the next 5 years compared to 53% who said they expected care to get worse. Satisfaction with different NHS services Satisfaction with GP services was 35% and dissatisfaction was 45%. Neither was a statistically significant change on the previous year. Just over 1 in 5 respondents (22%) said they were satisfied with NHS dentistry, with 54% saying they were dissatisfied. These are similar results to the previous year. 22% of respondents said they were satisfied with A&E services. Dissatisfaction was 53%. In 2024, 19% said they were satisfied with A&E services, although the change is not statistically significant. 37% of respondents were satisfied with inpatient and outpatient hospital care, an increase of 5 percentage points since 2024, although not statistically significant. 29% were dissatisfied – no change on last year. Attitudes to NHS standards, access and staffing Half of respondents (50%) were satisfied with the quality of NHS care in 2025, and 28% were dissatisfied. There was no statistically significant change since 2024. Only a minority of respondents were satisfied with waiting times for GP appointments (27%), hospital appointments (16%) and in A&E (14%). There were no statistically significant changes compared to last year. Only 12% agreed that ‘there are enough staff in the NHS these days’. 71% disagreed. There was no significant change compared to 2024. Attitudes to NHS financing and efficiency 9% of respondents said that the government spent too much or far too much money on the NHS, 22% said that it spent about the right amount and 66% said that it spent too little or far too little. There were no statistically significant changes compared to 2024. Only 13% of respondents agreed that the NHS spends the money it has efficiently. 55% disagreed with this statement. There was no change compared to 2024. When asked about government choices on tax and spending on the NHS, the public remain closely divided between raising taxes and spending more on the NHS (45%) and keeping taxation and spending at the same level (43%). Only 8% would choose to cut taxes and spend less on the NHS. There was no statistically significant change since 2024. Supporters of the Green party (70%) and the Labour party (57%) were significantly more likely to support higher taxes and higher NHS spending than supporters of Reform (32%) and the Conservative party (30%). NHS priorities and principles On being asked what the top three most important priorities for the NHS should be, both making it easier to get a GP appointment and improving A&E waiting times were selected as top priorities by 46% of respondents, followed by 45% for waiting times for planned operations and 43% for increasing the number of NHS staff. People aged 18–64 were more likely than those aged 65 and over to prioritise A&E waiting times (48% vs 38%) and increasing NHS staff (46% vs 35%) whereas those aged 65 and over prioritised prevention and staying healthy (48% vs 36%). As in previous years, a large majority of respondents agreed that the founding principles of the NHS should ‘definitely’ or ‘probably’ apply in 2025: that the NHS should be free of charge when you need to use it (89%), the NHS should primarily be funded through taxes (81%) and the NHS should be available to everyone (74%). There has been some decrease across the past five years in the proportion who think these principles should ‘definitely’ or ‘probably’ apply since the questions were first asked in 2021. The greatest decrease over time has been support for the principle that ‘the NHS should be available to everyone’. Support for the principle that the NHS should be available to everyone varied significantly by supporters of different political parties, with 68% of Labour supporters agreeing this principle should ‘definitely’ apply compared to 45% of Conservative supporters and 30% of Reform supporters. Social care In 2025, 14% of respondents said they were satisfied with social care. 49% were dissatisfied with social care – a statistically significant decrease from 2024 when this figure was 53%. The top three priorities for social care were helping people stay independent at home for as long as possible (46%), making social care more affordable to those who need it (45%) and improving the quality of social care services (44%). When asked about government choices on tax and spending on social care, 51% said the government should keep taxes and spending on social care at the same level as now. 38% said the government should increase taxes and spend more on social care. 6% said the government should reduce taxes and spend less on social care. Support for increasing taxes and spending more on social care was lower than for the NHS – it was 45% for the NHS. The difference was statistically significant.
  8. News Article
    The first targets for neighbourhood health have been set in long-awaited government guidance. The neighbourhood health framework, published on Tuesday afternoon, gives several national targets related to GP, elective outpatient and community services. They include: At least 25% diversion rate from outpatient referrals through “single points of access” in at least 10 high‑volume specialties by next March; Reduce secondary care outpatient follow-up appointments by at least 10% by next March; A 10% reduction in acute outpatient appointments for under‑16s by March 2029; A new target date of March next year for GPs to see 90% of clinically urgent patients the same day – an objective first announced last autumn; A 10% reduction in non‑elective admissions and bed days for people with mid to severe frailty, care home residents and housebound patients by March 2029; A 10% increase in people identified as approaching end of life and a 10% reduction in their non‑elective admissions and bed days by March 2029; At least a 10% improvement in evidence‑based clinical outcomes for people with CVD, diabetes, COPD, mental health conditions and dementia; and A 10% cent increase in patients with diabetes receiving all eight recommended care‑process elements. In addition, the framework says that each area – “through” health and wellbeing boards – should agree local priorities and measures, which are likely to focus more on prevention and wider public services. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 17 March 2026
  9. News Article
    The government has admitted that a manifesto pledge was badly designed and is on course to be missed, a year after telling integrated care boards to deliver it. Labour’s 2024 manifesto said it “will tackle the immediate [dental] crisis with a rescue plan to provide 700,000 more urgent dental appointments”. A year ago, integrated care boards were told to commission their share of the “additional urgent appointments” to take place during 2025-26. But this week, NHS England wrote to ICBs saying: “The government has now confirmed that the 700,000 commitment will be broadened with immediate effect to all dental appointments measured through courses of treatment.” Several sector sources confirmed to HSJ that the original target was effectively being scrapped. Speaking at a conference last week, the former NHSE chief dental officer Sara Hurley said: “It’s lovely that [the government] are going to be able to fiddle with, sorry, amend the definition to what the new appointment offering is.” There has been widespread outcry in recent years because in many areas it is extremely difficult to get NHS dental appointments. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 2 March 2026
  10. Content Article
    For many people, accessing care through general practice can feel like opening the door to a maze. Equally, GPs find themselves in a tangled web of administrative burdens, mounting time pressures and are navigating a maze of referrals to get patients specialist help when they need it. In this report, the Royal College of General Practitioners and the Patients Association to highlight how general practice can be made truly accessible and navigable for all. 1. Every patient should find the NHS easy to navigate The NHS must provide clear and consistent information to support patients as active partners in decisions about their healthcare, including knowing where to go to get help. Patients and GPs must be equal partners in co-designing care pathways so that they reflect their real experiences and needs and are easier for everyone to navigate. Patients with complex health or communication needs must be equally supported to navigate NHS services and participate as partners in decisions about their care. 2. Every patient should be able to see their GP when they need to Governments must set out clear plans to train, employ and retain enough GPs so that patients can access care from their GP when they need it, addressing both the workforce numbers, the employment structures and funding models that determine where and how GP’s can work. To make it easier for patients to see a GP who they know and knows them, practices should be resourced to offer continuity of care. 3. Every patient should be able to access their information and track referrals via user-friendly systems Patients and GPs must be equal partners in the design of simpler, user-friendly systems which allow patients to see key information about their care, including being able to easily track specialist referrals. This can only be achieved with significant government investment in systems that are easier to use, better connected, and that reduce administrative burden. A diverse and representative group of patients must be active and equal partners in the co-production and review of the systems, including those who cannot access online systems to mitigate digital exclusion.
  11. News Article
    NHS England is planning to dismantle the patient engagement portal supplier market in a bid to save £11m and directly integrate appointment management into the NHS App, HSJ can reveal. This month, NHSE has told suppliers of PEPs – who have been the intermediary between hospital IT systems and patients for appointment booking for years – that within the next three years they would no longer be required to provide core appointment features through the NHS App. Instead, trusts will move towards direct integration into the NHS App through their electronic patient record, known as Wayfinder direct integration. It comes as the government pushes for the NHS App – which in December had more than 13 million log-ins – to be the single front door for patients. The five core features NHSE wants to bring in-house are: viewing appointment details, completing pre-appointment questionnaires, accessing documents, managing or cancelling appointments, and receiving notifications. Hospital patient administration systems (PAS) and EPRs – which hold appointment booking and scheduling data – will share that data with the NHS App. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 25 February 2026
  12. News Article
    GPs in England will have to guarantee same-day appointments for any patient with urgent health needs, under a new clause being added to their contract. The government said the changes would ensure everyone who needs to be seen quickly would be. Spending on GP services will increase by nearly £500 million - a 3.6% boost in cash terms - to help pay for the commitment, which the government said will be used to help recruit more doctors. But the British Medical Association said the government was at risk of creating unrealistic expectations given how stretched GP services already were. Read full article. Source: BBC News, 24 February 2026.
  13. Content Article
    Northern Health and Social Care Trust were finalists at the Picker Experience Network 2025 Awards for their 'Community Appointment Day' initiative. They have shared their presentation about the initiative with the hub.
  14. Content Article
    The NHS in England has introduced various innovations to keep up with the growing demand for elective care, one of which is patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU). This evaluation sought to understand staff experiences of implementing PIFU. The authors of this study conducted a rapid qualitative service evaluation between June 2022 and July 2023, based on semi-structured interviews with operational/managerial and clinical NHS staff from five English NHS Trusts, and an online workshop with 21 additional members of staff from the English NHS. The study found that implementation of PIFU affected staff roles, workload, and job satisfaction. Levels of PIFU uptake, and experience with similar models, affected the extent to which participants experienced the impact of PIFU. How PIFU was implemented varied. Some staff saw changes in their role because of new administrative demands, safety-netting procedures (such as proactive measures by specialty teams to mitigate the risk of patients not initiating appointments when necessary), and selection of suitable patients. PIFU was felt by some staff to increase, and by others to decrease, workload. PIFU affected intensity of work, interrelated with other factors such as the size of waiting lists, and conditions experienced by patients. Whether staff were satisfied with PIFU related to its impact on their role and workload. Satisfaction was also affected by whether staff believed PIFU delivered benefits for patients, and by the aims they felt were driving rollout.
  15. Content Article
    The 10 Year Health Plan for England aims to “end the 8am scramble” and “restore the family doctor” through shifts to increased digitalisation, more community-based services and a greater focus on prevention. But how do people feel about these shifts, and how do they think they will affect access to primary care? This study from the THIS.Institute, published in the BMJ, involving interviews with patients, carers and staff, offers striking insights, suggests a mixed picture of impacts. Findings: Digitalisation: may offer convenience – but could risk continuity of care, does not increase supply of appointments with GPs, and risks excluding some patients. Community-based care: may increase options available, but dispersion of services across wider geographical areas could pose challenges for some patients and increase risks of fragmentation and burdens of coordination. Prevention: important but could add to already-saturated workloads. May also risk becoming task-focused and impersonal, and consume resource for patient-initiated care. More clarity is needed about what patients can expect and what “good enough” looks like in terms of access, as is careful co-design and evaluation of the detail of the three shifts.
  16. News Article
    The majority of hospital appointments went ahead despite almost 2,000 doctors going on strike for five days, according to the NHS. More than 5,000 fewer patients were in hospital this Christmas Day compared to last year, with 78.8 per cent of beds occupied. Read full story Source: Independent, 6 January
  17. News Article
    Patients with mobility issues have been left stranded with no way of getting to and from their hospital appointments, according to a review. Every weekday, more than 20,000 people use NHS non-emergency patient transport services to get to appointments, operations and services such as dialysis. But a review by Healthwatch, the patient watchdog, revealed transport services across the country are sometimes cancelled at the last minute or patients are told they do not meet the requirements for transport. Wheelchair user John Nye told The Independent he had to pay almost £100 for a wheelchair accessible taxi to get to and from his operation in June. The appointment was at 7am but patient transport was unable to take him before 8.30am. Read full article. Source: The Independent, 17 December 2025
  18. Event
    until
    There are many reasons why missed appointments happen, and some of the causes can be complex. ‘Missingness’ can have poor outcomes for patients and research shows that those who experience the greatest health inequalities are at highest risk. Join this Patients Association webinar looking at missed appointments, or ‘missingness’. Together, we’ll explore the reasons why patients might miss their health appointments, from practical barriers to emotional and systemic factors that can make healthcare feel out of reach. We’ll also discuss what can be done to ensure patients feel more confident in attending those appointments, and how services can make it easier for people to communicate when they can’t. This webinar will highlight perspectives that patients, and healthcare professionals, may not have considered, helping us all to think creatively about how to make visiting healthcare services as accessible as possible. Speakers: The session will be chaired be Sarah Tilsed, Head of Partnerships and Involvement, who will be joined by: Dr Susan Langridge, Deep End GP Andrea Williamson, GP and Professor of General Practice, lead for the missingness in healthcare project Caroline Norman, HARP (health access for refugees) Project Manager at Refugee Council. Register
  19. News Article
    Patients across England are set to gain direct access to specialist care via the NHS App, as dozens of new pilot schemes aim to streamline healthcare and ease pressure on hospitals. This initiative, encompassing 45 pilots across 37 trusts, is projected by the government to free up 500,000 hospital appointments annually once fully implemented. Officials believe allowing patients to self-report vital health data, such as blood pressure and oxygen levels, through technology could significantly reduce strain on the health service, particularly ahead of winter. The schemes will primarily focus on five key specialisms: ear, nose, and throat (ENT), gastroenterology, respiratory medicine, urology, and cardiology. Patients will utilise the NHS App to complete necessary forms and questionnaires, negating the need for in-person hospital visits. This expansion of remote care coincides with a world-first NHS trial exploring remote support for motor neurone disease patients. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: “Patients expect care fit for the 21st century and that’s what I’m determined to deliver. “This is a government that puts the NHS and patients first as our record investment in the service shows. “Using tech to bring care closer to home frees up hospital appointments for those who truly need them and makes life simpler for everyone. “That’s our mission: care that’s easier, faster, and always within reach." Read full story Source: The Independent, 7 November 2025
  20. News Article
    The number of NHS appointments, tests and operations delivered by private hospitals and clinics has increased by almost 500,000 this year, now totalling 6.15 million. Health secretary Wes Streeting said the policy tackles a “two-tier” system by cutting waiting times and ensuring prompt treatment for NHS patients in England. Private providers report delivering around 10 per cent of elective NHS activity. Between August 2024 and September 2025 they conducted an average of 19,000 surgical procedures and 100,000 outpatient appointments every week, treating more than 1.1 million people. Mr Streeting said: “I’ll do everything I can to get NHS patients treated faster, free at the point of use. “This is a principled, progressive position, not just a pragmatic one. “We’re not prepared to continue two-tier healthcare, when those who can afford it get treated on time, and those who can’t are left behind. Wealth shouldn’t determine health.” Using spare capacity in the private sector is key to the government’s target of ensuring that 92 per cent of patients in England should wait no longer than 18 weeks from referral to treatment. Other measures to cut waiting lists include the use of community diagnostic centres (CDCs) and carrying out more surgical procedures on evenings and weekends. Read full story Source: The Independent, 25 October 2025
  21. Content Article
    The NHS is set to deliver faster care for millions of patients thanks to the most radical reset of the NHS in a generation. 2.5 million fewer patients will be waiting more than 18 weeks to receive planned care. 190,000 more cancer patients will begin potentially lifesaving treatment within 2 months of their referral over next 3 years. Patients to see faster access to diagnostic tests and GP appointments.  The 3-year roadmap sets out the NHS plan to get back to delivering against its constitutional standards on elective care, which will see 2.5 million fewer patients waiting more than 18 weeks for treatment by March 2029. It will ensure 85% of people with a cancer diagnosis receive their first treatment within 2 months of a referral – up from 70% today. NHS analysis suggests just over 300,000 cancer patients will get their first treatment within 62 days of receiving a referral in 2028/29, up from 226,939 last year (2024/25). While 96% of patients will begin treatment within one more of a cancer diagnosis by 2028/29. Meeting these ambitious targets will be achieved by radically transforming how services are delivered – shifting more care out of hospital, freeing up capacity to drive down waiting times – and major improvements in health service productivity. As part of the biggest shake up of the NHS financial regime in more than a decade, hospitals will be financially incentivised to ensure more patients are treated out of hospital, instead receiving the care they need from local neighbourhood teams and in community diagnostic centres. This will start with immediate action to improve GP access and tackle unwarranted variation between practices – consulting on a new priority to deliver same day appointments, whether face to face, online or by phone, for all clinically urgent patients. The Framework also sets an ambitious target for 80% of community health service activity within 18 weeks – tackling long waiting times for community services, which have seen a surge in the number of adults and children waiting for more than 2 years for care. This will be supported by shifting more resources into community services for people with highest needs – such as frailer older people – reducing unnecessary hospital admissions and helping them manage their health at home. In line with the ambitions of the 10 Year Plan, the framework sets targets to make sure 95% of appointments after triage are available via the App and ensure all providers are leveraging the full potential of the Federated Data Platform by the end of 2028/29. Patients will no longer be asked to waste their time at follow-up appointments that aren’t necessary – freeing up clinicians to see the patients that need to see them most. Areas of the country that fail to progress on unnecessary follow ups will be performance managed. More patients will get appropriate care as part of the ‘Advice and Guidance’ scheme which allows GPs to get specialist clinical advice from leading experts at the touch of a button – rather than sending the patient for a hospital appointment which sometimes isn’t needed. Radiology departments will no longer be scanning people unnecessarily thanks to the rollout of i-Refer – an online software linked to real time up to date clinical guidance to ensure only those who need a scan are offered one.
  22. Content Article
    After a recent visit to her local hospital for a routine blood test, Rita Gil reflects on her experience and the patient safety concerns she has around data privacy. I recently needed to go for some general blood tests to check on my health concerns. The process was relatively simple and smooth; however, it did uncover some flaws in patient safety regarding data privacy that go far beyond the seemingly harmless waiting room, and could put patients unknowingly at risk of fraud and scams. After my GP had approved the blood tests, I was asked to book a slot using the Swiftqueue website, which is linked to my local hospital. To book a blood test, the steps are simple: selection of date/time and login to my NHS account that has my name, age and other details. On the 30 September, I went to the hospital and the signs were showing the phlebotomy clinic had moved from where it had previously been located. Around the corner, I was greeted with a large room that had been split—to the left, they were drawing blood with what seemed to be temporary bi-fold walls, and to the right, there was a seating area with the check-in tablet. As I sat waiting for my name to be called (which previously would have been a name on a screen), I became very aware of how many vulnerable people were around me. As each name was called, I was able to see who the person was standing up and going in for their blood test. As each person went for their bloods, I could hear the nurse asking the person to confirm their full name, date of birth and first line of their address. Of course, I understand that they need to ensure who they are seeing matches the details on their systems. However, as someone in the waiting room able to hear all this information, and working in tech as my profession, where data protection is key, I couldn’t help but think how exposed the patients were. I could now not only be able to identify the person by their ‘looks’ and name, but I could also know their full name, date of birth and first line of their address (which, knowing most people are local, wouldn’t be too difficult to figure out the full address). Exposing all this information to an unknown audience makes the patient a target. In a world where cybersecurity and fraud are real problems, protecting private personal information is imperative and mandatory by law. It’s easy to forget how a simple overheard conversation might affect patients later with fraud scams and other threats. In a room where the same process occurs each day, the pattern of information that is obtainable is easily identifiable and exposes a risk. Now, I can only assume most people in the waiting room are there and not thinking too deeply about all of this—the truth is we don't know who is in a waiting room, and scammers and fraudsters are becoming incrementally more clever. Personal information—as complete as the one described above—should not be this accessible to an unknown audience. Regardless of whether the new phlebotomy clinic location was a temporary set-up, protecting patient safety goes beyond safe care given by professionals. Personal data protection should be embedded into the planning of the hospital care set-up, as the most vulnerable people are known to be found in these spaces and fraudsters are actively looking for new and clever opportunities to prey on them. It would be utopian to believe that we are surrounded by people with good intentions only; the reality is that data protection exists due to a real threat from fraudsters, and everyone is at risk. Making private information accessible in communities can cause harm to patients outside of the seemingly safe and harmless waiting room.
  23. News Article
    A trust is reviewing potential harm to 650 patients who were lost from its waiting lists, some of whom have waited more than 15 months. Princess Alexandra Hospital Trust said the issue related to a national system which automatically removes referrals unable to be found an appointment slot within 180 days. It discovered more than 2,300 such patients who were “not visible or tracked” after being removed from the “appointment slot issue” list. The Essex trust has identified 650 whom it believed were still waiting for an appointment, and offered them new appointments. After this, it is reviewing whether those 650 came to any harm – a process it said it expected to complete by the end of this month. Anna Jebb, chief operating officer at PAHT, said no harm had been identified to date. PAHT said the discovery had resulted in people being added to its patient tracking list, some of which had waits of longer than 65 weeks (about a year and three months), and would likely hit its 18-week performance, which had improved in recent months. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 16 October 2025
  24. Content Article
    We hear time and time again on the hub about the lack of joined up care and communication within and across organisations. Patients and their families and carers not knowing who to contact to chase up a referral, having to travel miles for appointments, missing appointments because the letter didn’t arrive on time, or having to repeat the patient’s history and medications to every new healthcare professional they see because the notes haven’t been shared or clinicians "don’t have time to read them all". These issues are widespread and urgently need to be addressed if we are to prevent people falling through the gaps and suffering worse health outcomes. In this blog, Sue* shares her and her husband's experiences of trying to coordinate the healthcare system and highlights the challenges and frustrations they continuously face. Difficulties getting a diagnosis My husband Neil* has a very rare chronic condition that means unfortunately he is not managed in the area we live at as it’s a regional centre some miles away. We live in North Yorkshire, one of the largest geographical areas in the country, and we feed into various health economies. It took over 4 years and three different healthcare organisations before Neil got his diagnosis. Every time we see someone new we have to go through all of Neil’s medical history again, and then they often say that it’s not their area of expertise because they only deal directly with one area or speciality; they don't think of the patient as a whole. Whilst waiting to get the diagnosis, Neil had a heart attack so he was initially treated more locally to us but it was still over 40 miles away from where we live. When we called an ambulance for a second time he was taken to a different hospital from the first one he was treated in. So he was taken to two different geographical areas not even under the same trust. To add to this, Neil is also under lots of different specialities, i.e. rheumatology, general surgery, dermatology, respiratory and lipids. So he is being treated and has appointments in numerous places. Coordinating appointments and results With all these different specialties, even if they are within the same regional centre, none of the information is joined up or accessible, including blood results from the GP. We find that things are incorrect all the time and we spend a lot of time trying to coordinate Neil’s care and following up on test results, appointments, etc. Neil receives appointments in various ways—emails, phone calls, texts, letters, messages left on his answer phone. You might get a phone call followed by a letter, or you could get a message to say ignore the letter. You may miss a call but you don’t know which department to ring back because it usually comes up as an unknown number. Recently, Neil received a text message which said he was on a waiting list, but it didn’t say what it was for or what specialist department it was from. It said in the text that if you no longer wanted the appointment and wanted to cancel it, to follow a link, but we had no idea what the appointment was referring to or where it came from! As a patient you want to have some control over your health and be able to see all blood test results, scan results and letters from the hospitals. For example, it would be so much easier to look at Neil’s medications and patient letters if they were all in one place but you can't look at the medical records to see what's been said. The only way we can get it is waiting for the letter to be seen by the GP and then, eventually, added on to their system, but it's not always quick because again it's a different geographical area and systems that are disconnected. As a patient with a new disorder, you’re not familiar with the system. Neil was referred to other specialities from rheumatology. Unfortunately, the treatment plan. including tests or length of wait for appointments, isn’t shared directly with us. We rely on my note taking to ensure everything is completed and followed up. Often we end up going to an appointment without the tests Neil needs to have done due to the length of wait for the test, or the test being triaged and cancelled but this not communicated either to us or the referring doctor. The waiting for test results at the moment are long for some of these tests but if it was in your capacity to be able to seek or understand when you might possibly get them, you wouldn't then end up wasting an appointment. You would wait until you've had the results back or know when it might be. It could take us over two hours travelling time for a wasted appointment. We don’t want to waste our time and the time of others. Lack of communication Neil has radiotherapy coming up shortly and we've had no communications regarding it. I ended up making a phone call to inquire and was given a date. But we’ve still not received a phone call, no email, no letter or anything about it, even though they've got the date and time in their books. You can’t make plans, for example if you are trying to go away for the summer. If you’re waiting for a treatment, which on the NHS may take a while, you want to know when to expect the appointment. It’s a lot easier to manage your condition or diagnosis if you have the knowledge of when something's going to happen and you can manage your own expectations. Navigating the various healthcare apps To try and help with all of this we’ve been really keen to try and find a way to get all of Neil’s medical information, from many different organisations, together in one place and to rationalise appointments. We signed up to the NHS app which then put us on to System Online and then Neil was directed to AirMid UK. We've also found the Patients Know Best app which has been set up and says that you can access all your records but it seems to be only if an organisation has signed up to it. So we’ve got four apps to supposedly access the information but not one of them has all of Neil's information. We are actively looking for an online place which has all the information but none of it ties up. None of the apps give you the same information. We’ve asked our GP but he couldn’t help and hadn’t heard of some of the apps we’d found. A system that isn't working These are just a few examples of what we’re dealing with. I’m lucky as I have some medical knowledge so I know when we're missing something or waiting for something and I will chase up, but not everyone will have this knowledge. If it’s an older patient, or someone who hasn’t got family to support them, then they are on their own to navigate a very complex system. A system that isn't working. *The names in this blog have been changed to ensure anonymity. Are you a patient, relative or carer frustrated with navigating the healthcare system? Or is your GP practice or Trust doing something innovative to make it easier for patients? We would love to hear your stories. Please add to our community forum (you will need to register with the hub, it's free and easy to sign up) or email us at [email protected]. Related reading The challenges of navigating the healthcare system: David's story The challenges of navigating the healthcare system: Margaret's story Navigating the healthcare system as a university student: My personal experience Lost in the system? NHS referrals "I love the NHS, BUT..." Preventing needless harms caused by poor communication in the NHS (DEMOS, November 2023) Robust collaborative practice must become the bedrock of modern healthcare Robbie: A homeless patient’s struggles with the system Digital-only prescription requests: An elderly woman sent round the houses Lost in the system: the need for better admin Digital-only prescription requests: An elderly woman sent round the houses
  25. Content Article
    This is the second in a series of reports by the Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) on the theme of healthcare provision in prison. The first investigation focused on the delivery of emergency care. This investigation looks at improving patient safety in relation to continuity of care for patients detained in prison. In the context of this investigation, ‘continuity of care’ means maintaining a patient’s healthcare throughout the prison system regardless of their location. The investigation considered the movement of patients between prisons, to and from court, and on release. It also looked at patient attendance at appointments for internal primary care services and secondary care outpatient appointments. Findings of this report include: ‘Did not attend’ (DNA) rates for outpatient appointments for patients in prison during 2024 were high, at 52% and 57% for males and females respectively. This compares to a DNA rate in the general population of 26% for both sexes. Female prison patients are often taken to outpatient appointments by male prison officers or a mix of male and female officers. This can affect the patients’ decision making about whether to go or not, particularly for appointments that are for sensitive female clinics such as obstetrics and gynaecology. The use of telemedicine in prison healthcare has declined since the end of the COVID-19 pandemic and it is used rarely in comparison to face-to-face appointments. Telemedicine has the potential to reduce the burden of prison officer escort duties for outpatient appointments (which costs £48m to £50m per year), increase the number of outpatient appointments available per day to patients in prison, and reduce the number of appointments that patients refuse to go to. Patients in prison may not attend pre-arranged appointments because of a lack of information about the appointment caused by privacy and security issues. For example, they may not be informed about timings, the nature of the appointment, or the health reasons and importance of attending. This means they are not able to make an informed decision about their health and whether they want to attend or not. Patients in prison are more likely to miss outpatient appointments than patients in the community, due to the prison regime and logistics beyond the control of the patient. Prison healthcare departments rely on relationships they have developed and maintained with hospital booking teams in order to arrange appointments that fit in with the prison regime. This is due to a lack of formal arrangements between prisons and their local hospitals. Patients who are released following a court appearance, who had treatment planned, are not routinely given information about upcoming appointments they may have. This means they may unknowingly miss booked appointments, delaying their care and treatment. Details about patients who are being transferred to different areas are not always communicated effectively between prison healthcare teams and hospital booking teams. Often hospital booking teams are not made aware that a patient has been transferred until an appointment is missed, which means treatment is delayed. In this report HSSIB recommends that: HM Prison and Probation Service updates Prison Service Order 3050, ‘Continuity of healthcare for prisoners’, including guidance on communication of information about prison patients when transferring between prisons, and on the process when prison patients are released from court. This will reduce variation and ensure better continuity of care for patients when being transferred or on their release. HM Prison and Probation Service standardises the approach to the provision of prison officer escorts for outpatient appointments to protect the dignity of patients and reduce variability of escort slots. This will assist in reducing the likelihood of patients refusing to attend healthcare appointments, while balancing appointment availability, thus improving the continuity and equality of care. NHS England, via regional commissioning teams, works with HM Prison and Probation Service to identify barriers to using telemedicine for outpatient appointments, and then implements local solutions to promote and enhance the capability and usability of telemedicine. This aims to reduce the burden on prisons of providing escorts and the likelihood of patients not attending appointments.
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.