Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Quality improvement'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning campaigns
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
    • Data and insight
    • Research
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


First name


Last name


Country


Join a private group (if appropriate)


About me


Organisation


Role

Found 740 results
  1. Event
    Speaker: Professor Ian Leistikow; Adviser at the Dutch Health & Youth Care Inspectorate and Professor at Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands Challenges that health and care faces, translate to challenges for the regulatory authorities. Classic regulatory strategies aimed at compliance increasingly fall short in contributing to quality of (health)care. In this webinar Ian will use the model of ‘value driven regulation’ to show how the Dutch Inspectorate strives to keep up with the dynamics of the sectors it regulates, by keeping its eye on creating societal value. Ian will also give an overview of the broad range of scientific research projects within the Inspectorate aimed at improving the positive impact of its regulation. Find out more
  2. Content Article
    The National Quality and Patient Safety Directorate (NQPSD) is a team of healthcare professionals working within the national Health Service Executive (HSE) Ireland to improve patient safety and quality of care. They work in collaboration with Health Service Executive operations, patient partners, healthcare workers and other internal and external partners. Their work is guided by the Patient Safety Strategy 2019-2024. 
  3. Event
    This event gives trainees at all levels the opportunity to attend, present and gain feedback on their Audit and QI work. Further lectures will include the McKeown Medal Lecture, a keynote on patient safety and discussion from a Trainee Committee member. Trainees are invited to submit their abstracts for consideration for presentation at this event. Topics for submission: General Surgery, Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Specialties & Common Interest and Patient Safety. Register
  4. Content Article
    The Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) are a set of quality indicators developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) providing information on potential hospital complications and adverse events after surgeries, procedures, and childbirth. They have been used for the past two decades in the USA for monitoring potentially preventable patient safety events in the inpatient setting through the automated screening of readily available administrative data. However, these indicators are also used for hospital benchmarking and cross-country comparisons in other nations with different health-care settings and coding systems as well as missing present on admission (POA) flags in the administrative data. This study sought to comprehensively assess and compare the validity of 16 PSIs in Switzerland, where they have not been previously applied.
  5. Content Article
    Authors of this editorial, published in BMJ Quality and Safety, conclude by stating that while the use of classification to identify patients who have additional needs and/or are at increased risk of harm has potential benefits, care needs to be taken to avoid possible harm and unintended consequences. They highlight several actions that would help ensure the benefits of classification are maximised, but note that none of these are necessarily easy to achieve in practice, especially in the context of overwhelmed and under-resourced health services. However, ensuring that patients with additional needs and/or risks have these appropriately identified and responded to while receiving healthcare must be a priority. The need for healthcare to be equitable, that is, not vary in quality because of a patient’s personal characteristics, is recognised as an important quality dimension, and this issue has received increased attention in recent years. If used well, classification can be part of the move to ensuring more equitable care for those with additional needs.
  6. Content Article
    This article outlines a recent improvement put in place by a ward at Sir Robert Peel Community Hospital, part of University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust. The team won an award for implementing learning following a patient fall to help drastically reduce the frequency of incidents and improving patient safety.
  7. Content Article
    Join Alan Lindemann, an obstetrics-gynecology physician, who shares his insights and real-life experiences, shedding light on the issues surrounding patient care, medical decision-making, and the role of institutions and personal connections in shaping health care outcomes. Discover how the pursuit of quality care can sometimes be obstructed by self-interest and the need to protect reputations. Alan also proposes innovative ideas to enhance transparency and public involvement in health care quality assurance.
  8. Content Article
    Emergency surgical patients are at high risk for harm because of errors in care. Quality improvement methods that involve process redesign, such as “Lean,” appear to improve service reliability and efficiency in healthcare. This study found that lean can substantially and simultaneously improve compliance with a bundle of safety related processes. Given the interconnected nature of hospital care, this strategy might not translate into improvements in safety outcomes unless a system-wide approach is adopted to remove barriers to change.
  9. Event
    This webinar will cover NIHR research that could help improve the safety and quality of maternity care. Speakers will present actionable evidence that attendees can implement in their own practice. Presentations will be followed by a Q&A session, giving you a unique opportunity to quiz the researchers on how you could act on this research, and reflect on potential barriers and facilitators. The webinar will cover: women’s experiences of labour induction the 7 features of safe care in maternity units the role of hospital boards in improving maternity care. Register
  10. Content Article
    In his IHI Forum 2023 address, IHI President Emeritus and Senior Fellow Don Berwick explained why competitiveness does not lead to the best possible care. He shared his view on the limitations of free-market healthcare and his personal experience of how kindness can support our efforts to improve care.
  11. Content Article
    Few interventions that succeed in improving healthcare locally end up becoming spread and sustained more widely. This indicates that we need to think differently about spreading improvements in practice. Drawing on a focused review of academic and grey literature, the authors outline how spread, scale-up, and sustainability have been defined and operationalised, highlighting areas of ambiguity and contention. Following an overview of relevant frameworks and models, they focus on three specific approaches and unpack their theoretical assumptions and practical implications: the Dynamic Sustainability Framework, the 3S (structure, strategy, supports) infrastructure approach for scale-up, and the NASSS (non-adoption, abandonment, and challenges to scale-up, spread, and sustainability) framework. Key points are illustrated through empirical case narratives and the Element concludes with actionable learning for those engaged in improvement activities and for researchers.
  12. Content Article
    Boards and leaders of healthcare organisations are legally responsible for the performance of their organisation and must take definitive responsibility for improvements, successful delivery and failures in the quality of care. Board effectiveness relies on the ways in which board members translate their knowledge and information into quality and safety plans with measurable goals, maintain oversight on progress towards these goals and hold the chief executive accountable for these goals. This resource by the Canadian Patient Safety Institute lists tools available to boards and board members to allow them to understand their legislative responsibilities for quality and safety, conduct self-evaluation and understand the competencies needed to lead on quality and patient safety.
  13. Content Article
    Patient care inevitably raises issues of safety. Safety measures can never be failsafe, but they can always be improved. The aim of this publication is to offer guidance to boards on helping to bring about these improvements. The publication was developed by Monitor for NHS foundation trusts, though its principles apply equally to other NHS settings. It draws on evidence and best practices from UK pilot sites, and also taps the experience of healthcare providers in other developed countries who use similar principles and approaches. The field research and work with the UK pilot sites took place between October 2009 and March 2010.
  14. Content Article
    This guide by the Health Foundation can be used to make the case for improvement to policy, executive, operational and front-line audiences, and to initiate and support conversations about the benefits of improvement approaches among key stakeholders. The guide is divided into four broad areas improvement approaches can benefit: the health and care workforce patients, service users and society  organisations and system-level bodies. Specific examples are given for each area, illustrating the diverse and multi-faceted benefits that come from improvement approaches.
  15. Content Article
    There is a direct correlation between safety event management practices and care quality outcomes. The right safety management tools, supported by a shared perception and tolerance of risk, will help organisations go beyond reporting event data to improve safety culture.
  16. Event
    This conference will focus on measuring, understanding and acting on patient experience insight, and demonstrating responsiveness to that insight to ensure patient feedback is translated into quality improvement and assurance. Through national updates and case study presentations the conference will support you to measure, monitor and improve patient experience in your service, and ensure that insight leads to quality improvement. Sessions will include learning from patients, improving patient experience, practical sessions focusing on delivering a patient experience based culture, measuring patient experience, demonstrating insight and responsiveness in real time, monitoring and improving staff experience, the role of human factors in improving quality, using patient experience to drive improvement, changing the way we think about patient experience, and learning from excellence in patient experience practice. For further information and to book your place visit https://www.healthcareconferencesuk.co.uk/virtual-online-courses/patient-experience-insight or email frida@hc-uk.org.uk Follow on Twitter @HCUK_Clare #PatientExp hub members receive a 20% discount. Email info@pslhub.org for the discount code.
  17. Event
    Clinical Audit for Improvement 2024 is now in its 24th year and brings together clinicians, senior/middle managers and leading local and national clinical audit and improvement experts. Over the last two decades this event has become the ‘must-attend’ annual conference for clinical audit and QI professionals. Historically this one-day virtual conference has featured national updates with leaders providing information on relevant current and future policy. However, in 2024 the focus will change slightly with more emphasis on practical skills and techniques needed by those involved in delivering clinical audit projects at a local and/or national level. For further information and to book your place visit https://www.healthcareconferencesuk.co.uk/virtual-online-courses/clinical-audit-improvement-summit or email frida@hc-uk.org.uk hub members receive a 20% discount. Email info@pslhub.org for the discount code. Follow on Twitter @HCUK_Clare #ClinicalAudit2024
  18. Content Article
    Despite their widespread use, the evidence base for the effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives remains mixed. Lack of clarity about ‘what good looks like’ in collaboratives remains a persistent problem. This qualitative study in BMJ Open aimed to identify the distinctive features of a state-wide collaboratives programme that has demonstrated sustained improvements in quality of care in a range of clinical specialties over a long period. The authors identified five features that characterised success in the collaboratives programme: learning from positive deviance high-quality coordination high-quality measurement and comparative performance feedback careful use of motivational levers mobilising professional leadership and building community.
  19. Content Article
    This is part of our series of Patient Safety Spotlight interviews, where we talk to people working for patient safety about their role and what motivates them. Sonia talks to us about how her role at NHS Confederation helps her understand the issues facing NHS staff and why she decided to start drawing graphics to communicate important information to patients and staff.
  20. Content Article
    The opioid epidemic has been declared a public health emergency in the US, with major news outlets calling operating rooms “unintended gateways.” In response to this emergency, a team from Thomas Jefferson University sought to decrease their organisation's contribution to the potential diversion pool—the opioids surgeons prescribe to patients which go unused. This article in the journal Patient Safety looks at the research and improvement work undertaken by the team, who concluded that surgical departments can develop opioid reduction toolkits aimed at reducing the potential diversion pool of opioids in communities.
  21. Content Article
    In 2022 the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) launched the CMS National Quality Strategy (NQS), an ambitious long-term initiative that aims to promote the highest quality outcomes and safest care for all. This document gives an overview of the strategy, using infographics to explain its four priority areas: Outcomes and alignment Equity and engagement Safety and resiliency Interoperability and scientific advancement
  22. Content Article
    The EvidenceNOW: Advancing Heart Health in Primary Care trial was designed to assist primary care practices in the US in implementing evidence-based practices in cardiovascular care and building capacity for quality improvement. This qualitative study in BMC Primary Care aimed to gain a comprehensive understanding of perspectives from research participants and team members on the value of implementation strategies and factors that influenced the EvidenceNOW initiative in Virginia. Read a simplified research summary: Strategies for implementing large-scale quality improvement in primary care
  23. Content Article
    Efforts to increase physician engagement in quality and safety are most often approached from an organisational or administrative perspective. Given hospital-based physicians’ strong professional identification, physician-led strategies may offer a novel strategic approach to enhancing physician engagement. It remains unclear what role medical leadership can play in leading programmes to enhance physician engagement. In this study, Rotteau et al. explore physicians’ experience of participating in a Medical Safety Huddle initiative and how participation influences engagement with organisational quality and safety efforts. They found that The Medical Safety Huddle initiative supports physician engagement in quality and safety through intrinsic motivation. However, the huddles’ implementation must align with the organisation’s multipronged patient safety agenda to support multidisciplinary collaborative quality and safety efforts and leaders must ensure mechanisms to consistently address reported safety concerns for sustained physician engagement.
  24. Content Article
    The Situation Awareness for Everyone (S.A.F.E.) programme has been used at 50 sites over four years to help reduce 50 sites over four years. This toolkit has been produced by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) to support child health professionals to use S.A.F.E. principles at their sites. The toolkit contains four modules: Translating quality improvement into action Theories of patient safety and application to the S.A.F.E programme The S.A.F.E programme: from reaction to anticipation Team perspectives
  25. Content Article
    This article by NHS England looks at a national project on aligning quality improvement (QI), experience of care and co-production. It explains the principles of co-production and the approach taken to implement the project, as well as highlighting identified themes and key findings. It makes some practical recommendations based on these findings.
×
×
  • Create New...