Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Whistleblowing'.
-
News Article
A senior clinician at an east London NHS trust has told LBC News that patients have already come to harm because of serious failures linked to a new electronic patient record system — including one case where a patient is said to have died after a referral was missed. The whistleblower, who works at Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust and asked not to be named, alleged a patient with Covid, who also had cancer, died while waiting for a haematology referral after the request was not received by the department. The clinician said the problems have left staff “in tears”, caused missed referrals, delayed diagnoses, and created what they described as “chaos” across the organisation. They told LBC they were speaking out because they were “very, very worried for patient safety”. “It’s keeping me up at night,” they said. “We can’t deliver the service we want to for our patients, and I feel that we’re not being heard.” The senior clinician, who has worked in the NHS for several decades, said serious issues emerged after the Trust rolled out its electronic patient record system late last year. They alleged referrals were not always reaching the right teams, staff were struggling with missing or unreliable patient information, and serious findings were not always being escalated properly. “I think we are talking thousands of patients. I think we are talking about patient deaths," the whistleblower warned. “It will take some time for those to be revealed, the impact that it’s had.” Read full story Source: LBC News, 27 May 2026- Posted
-
- Technology
- Whistleblowing
- (and 2 more)
-
Content Article
hub Topic lead Hugh Wilkins shares his presentation slides on whistleblowing and speaking up.- Posted
-
- Speaking up
- Whistleblowing
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
The Annual Report of the National Guardian’s Office (NGO) has today been laid before Parliament, highlighting the work of Freedom to Speak Up guardians and the NGO in the year to the end of March 2026. The 2025/26 Annual Report summarises the achievements made by guardians in the previous 12 months in enabling and supporting staff across the NHS to speak up and thereby helping improve the quality and safety of care. It will be the final NGO Annual Report published as the Office prepares to close following recommendations from the Dash Review. NGO responsibilities are moving to providers, with functions being aligned with other staff voice functions in NHS England, and oversight within the Care Quality Commission. The Annual Report highlights the many activities that guardians have been involved in across the country in helping colleagues to continue to raise concerns and improve workplace culture. Between April and September 2025, the period for which latest figures were available, the report states that a total of 18,113 cases were raised with Freedom to Speak Up guardians. This is broadly consistent with the volume reported in the first half of 2024/25 (18,163), which suggests a continued willingness among workers to raise concerns. Related reading on the hub: Speaking up for patient safety: A new interview series about raising concerns and whistleblowing- Posted
-
- Speaking up
- Whistleblowing
- (and 2 more)
-
News Article
The NHS care watchdog has launched an inspection of a troubled trust after The Independent exposed delays in diagnosing and treating dozens of patients, including some with cancer. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has sent inspectors to review care at the Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust in Greater Manchester, just days after The Independent revealed that there were serious concerns about the safety of its gynaecological services. The trust launched an audit of the care of hundreds of women at Salford Royal Hospital’s gynaecology department in 2024, prompted by concerns that the necessary follow-ups were not carried out. It found that dozens of patients, including cancer patients, all under the care of Dr Jim Wolfe, were harmed when their diagnosis and treatment were delayed as a result of “admin failures”. Whistleblowers from the hospital’s gynaecology service came forward to The Independent with further concerns, alleging that the trust’s leadership was ignoring safety issues. At the same time, an unpublished NHS England review of the service from 2024 warned that it had a “significant backlog” of more than 2,000 patient letters, including test results and referrals for treatment, that hadn’t been sent to GPs as required. This resulted in some patients’ treatment being delayed by at least five months. The report also warned that the service was “heavily” reliant on agency doctors, and that its ability to provide on-call doctors had been affected by “significant sickness absence and suspension” among its consultants. Read full story Source: The Independent, 26 May 2026- Posted
-
- Investigation
- Organisation / service factors
- (and 2 more)
-
News Article
Former chair ‘sensationalised whistleblowing claim to oust CEO’
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
An employment tribunal has thrown out a former chair’s whistleblowing claims against a trust CEO, saying he “misrepresented and exaggerated” concerns as part of a campaign to oust her. Max Mclean, who was chair of Bradford Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust from 2019 to 2023, was heavily criticised in the ruling, which said it had “not identified any misconduct or lack of personal performance” by CEO Mel Pickup. In contrast, it said the former chair had launched a “personal battle” to oust Ms Pickup and “was (and remains) blind to any findings about his own behaviour”. Mr Mclean told HSJ he was “disappointed” by the tribunal’s conclusions and he did “not accept a number of the characterisations made about my motivations and conduct”. He denied asking NHS England to remove the CEO. Mr Mclean left the trust that year following an “irretrievable breakdown” in the relationship between him and Ms Pickup. In February 2025, he announced he would take the trust to an employment tribunal, claiming he was unfairly dismissed for raising concerns about baby deaths. However, according to a summary reasons judgment published by the trust this week, the tribunal ruled these did not represent whistleblowing concerns because of the way that he raised them, in an appraisal with Ms Pickup, and the time he took to raise the concerns. The tribunal said Mr Mclean had been notified of the neonatal incidents in April 2021. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 19 May 2026 Related reading on the hub: Speaking up for patient safety: A new interview series about raising concerns and whistleblowing- Posted
-
- Whistleblowing
- Leadership
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
In this podcast interview series, NHS whistleblower Peter Duffy and Patient Safety Learning’s Chief Executive Helen Hughes explore how the healthcare system responds when its staff raise concerns about patient safety. In each episode, Helen and Peter interview someone who has spoken up about patient safety issues in healthcare organisations, or who works to help staff raise concerns where they see unsafe care. In this episode, Helen and Peter speak to Rebecca Wight, a nurse consultant practitioner. Rebecca talks about her time at the The Christie, a cancer treatment centre in Manchester, and what happened to her when she tried to raise patient safety concerns about a colleague. Despite escalating these concerns to management and clinical leadership, Rebecca reported being ignored, having her concerns dismissed as a personal attack, and facing a "brick wall" from leadership. Rebecca reflects on the toll the process took on her and her family, her experience of going through an employment tribunal and why there needs to be more support for people who raise concerns within their organisation. Subscribe to our YouTube podcast to keep up to date with the latest episodes. Transcript of the interview Read a blog from Peter and Helen about the interview series- Posted
- 1 comment
-
- Speaking up
- Whistleblowing
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
NHS England whistleblowing takeover ‘will have chilling effect’
Mark Hughes posted a news article in News
NHS England’s plan to take over a key whistleblowing initiative will have a “chilling effect” on staff wishing to speak up, experts have warned. NHSE and individual trusts will take on the oversight of Freedom to Speak Up arrangements from the summer, following Penny Dash’s recommendation last year to disband the National Guardian’s Office as part of her government-commissioned patient safety review. New guidance says that, from July, NHS England will support existing guardian networks and individual guardians. This includes NHSE staff designated as “experts” providing confidential one-to-one support. Read full article (paywalled). Source: Health Service Journal, 21 April 2026. -
News Article
An NHS whistleblower has raised serious concerns about a spinal surgery scandal, warning that patients may have been “spectacularly abandoned” while senior figures “protected reputations at all costs”. Retired consultant anaesthetist Dr Glyn Smurthwaite said he and colleagues spent years attempting to raise concerns about the practice of former spinal surgeon John Bradley Williamson, but felt these were not adequately acted upon at the time. The surgeon worked at Salford Royal Hospital between 1991 and January 2015, when he was dismissed for misconduct unrelated to clinical care. “We had one opportunity to make an intransigent trust do the right thing,” he said.“We have spectacularly abandoned patients.” His warning comes as an NHS England-commissioned “review of the reviews” into the case is expected to report this month. However, the Sunday Express has learnt it is unlikely to recommend a full recall of all former patients treated by the surgeon. Instead, patients may be advised to come forward themselves if they wish to have their care reviewed. Read full story Source: GB News, 19 April 2026 Related reading on the hub: Speaking up for patient safety: A new interview series about raising concerns and whistleblowing- Posted
-
- Speaking up
- Whistleblowing
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
Whistleblownout
Patient Safety Learning posted an article in Whistle blowing
Dympna Waldron still reels more than twenty years after she blew the whistle on opioids in Irish hospitals.- Posted
-
- Whistleblowing
- Speaking up
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
In this article, Patient Safety Learning reflects on the results of the NHS Staff Survey 2025, focusing on responses relating to reporting, speaking up and acting on patient safety concerns. On 12 March 2026 the NHS published the results of its 2025 staff survey.[1] 729,423 staff from 238 organisations took part in this survey, which provides a snapshot of their experiences of working in the health service. The survey includes several questions on reporting patient safety incidents and near misses, concerns about clinical safety and views on speaking up more broadly. As we set out in this analysis, unfortunately the Staff Survey results suggest there are little signs of positive progress across many of these areas. Reporting of errors, near misses and incidents A high number of survey respondents, 86.16%, answered that their organisation encourages staff to report errors, near misses and incidents. However, 40.71% of respondents (over 290,000 staff) subsequently answered that they were unable to say with confidence that their organisation treats them fairly if they are involved in an error, near miss or incident. Answers to both these questions in the Staff Survey have remained fairly consistent across the past four years, as illustrated by the table and graph below. These results suggest there persists a significant disconnect between what organisations tell staff about reporting patient safety issues, and how staff feel they will be treated if they actually raise concerns. 67.3% of staff said that when errors, near misses or incidents are reported, their organisation takes action to ensure that they do not happen again. Responses to this question have also remained fairly static for the past four years (within a range of 67-69%), with nearly a third of staff consistently feeling unable to answer this question with a positive response. Responses to this question also vary significantly according to Trust type, with Community Trusts scoring highest on average (75.91%) and Ambulance Trusts scoring lowest (54.79%). Connected to this, nearly two-fifths of respondents, 38.98%, did not agree that they are given feedback about changes made in response to reported errors, near misses and incidents. When staff are unable to clearly see that their organisation acts on their safety concerns, it is understandable that they may be less motivated to report these. Concerns about clinical safety When asked about whether they would feel secure raising concerns about unsafe clinical practice, 71.1% of respondents answered this positively. Although this is quite a high percentage, the response rate in 2025 means that over 200,000 NHS employees, 28.9% of survey respondents, could not say that they would feel secure raising such concerns. When asked if they were confident that their organisation would address these concerns, 55.49% of staff responded positively. As illustrated by the table and graph below, responses to both these questions have remained fairly consistent across the last five years. Speaking up about concerns Turning to speaking up about concerns more broadly, 39.71% of survey respondents (over 280,000 staff) could not say that they felt safe to speak up about anything that concerns them in their organisation. As with the questions on reporting incidents, errors and near misses, again the average response varies significantly according to Trust type. When looking at Community Trusts, this figure drops to 30.2% but is significantly higher in Acute and Acute & Community Trusts (41.03%) and Ambulance Trusts (45.53%). When asked about their confidence in their organisation addressing their concern, just over half of all respondents did not express confidence that this would happen. As illustrated by the table and graph below, responses to both these questions have remained more or less consistent over the past five years, with a small decline this year. Safety culture in the NHS The 2025 staff survey results show no significant change in responses to questions on reporting, speaking up and acting on patient safety concerns in recent years. While the survey only provides an annual snapshot of experiences of working in the NHS, its findings suggest that a fear of speaking up and a lack of confidence that concerns will be acted on still persists in too many NHS organisations. These issues form a recurring theme across inquiries into major patient safety scandals.[2] [3] [4] They also can be seen reflected in the shocking experiences and testimonies of whistleblowers, such as those highlighted in our Speaking up for patient safety interview series.[5] Staff being able to raise concerns safely and effectively is essential for patient safety. However, as highlighted in a recent review shared by Roger Kline on the hub, the NHS continues to struggle with creating a culture where this happens reliably.[6] [7] Need for action It was notable that the need to tackle problems relating to safety culture was absent in the 10 Year Health Plan for the NHS, as highlighted in our response to this last year.[8] If the healthcare system is to truly be transformed over the next decade, then we cannot simply proceed by ignoring these issues or assuming they will resolve themselves. At Patient Safety Learning, we believe it is vital that we create a culture in healthcare that supports raising, discussing and addressing the risks of unsafe care. Year on year we highlight the stagnant set of staff survey results in this area because we do not believe the lack of improvement in this area is acceptable. Too often, at a national level, it appears that the extent and persistence of blame cultures in healthcare, and the need to tackle this, are acknowledged but action is not taken to address these significant challenges. It is difficult to imagine that the scale evidence of an unsafe culture in other safety critical industries would be tolerated—where the consequences of not addressing the risk in incidents may also be serious injury or loss of life. We hope that the soon to be published new NHS Quality Strategy will reflect on the importance of this issue and that health system leadership will recognise this issue as an urgent priority.[9] References NHS Staff Survey. NHS Staff Survey National Results. 12 March 2026. The Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry, 6 February 2013. Independent review of maternity services at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust. Ockenden Report: Findings, conclusions and essential actions from the independent review of maternity services at The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, 30 March 2022. Independent Investigation into East Kent Maternity Services. Maternity and neonatal services in East Kent – the Report of the Independent Investigation, 19 October 2022. Helen Hughes and Peter Duffy. Key themes emerging from our ‘Speaking up for patient safety’ interview series. Patient Safety Learning, 14 May 2025. Roger Kline. Power and the sound of silence. Patient Safety Learning, 11 March 2026. Roger Kline. Patient safety and speaking up – learning from the literature. Patient Safety Learning, 11 March 2026. Patient Safety Learning. 10 Year Health Plan: Patient Safety Learning’s response. 14 August 2025. Patient Safety Learning and Aqua. Patient safety and the new NHS Quality Strategy. 25 February 2026.- Posted
- 1 comment
-
1
-
- Staff safety
- Psychological safety
- (and 5 more)
-
Content Article
Power and the sound of silence—A blog by Roger Kline
Patient Safety Learning posted an article in Culture
In a review shared on the hub, Roger Kline, Research Fellow at Middlesex University Business School, explored the literature on patient safety and speaking up, arguing that staff being able to raise concerns safely and effectively is essential for patient safety, but the NHS continues to struggle with creating a culture where this happens reliably. In this blog, Roger reflects on some of the findings of his review. A critical characteristic of effective teams is whether every member is willing to speak up to share thoughts and ideas to improve processes, to raise concerns and admit mistakes. In healthcare, the failure of those to whom concerns are raised to listen and act on them decisively is a major factor in unsafe and suboptimal care delivery. NHS inquiry findings and recommendations are remarkably consistent on this issue. The Ely Inquiry (and other inquiries in the 1970s),[1] the Bristol Inquiry (2001),[2] the Mid-Staffordshire Hospital inquiries in 2010 and 2013,[3][4] and more recently Ockenden (2022),[5] all highlighted the failure to listen to staff who raised concerns and, worse, the victimisation of some of those who did raise concerns. Yet when the voices of healthcare staff are listened to and acted upon they can improve the safety and quality of services—as well as staff wellbeing.[6] Following the Francis Reports,[7] there was some limited improvement in NHS staff survey responses on whether NHS staff felt willing to raise concerns, whether they would be treated fairly if they did, and whether they felt their managers and employers would listen and act on those concerns. After Covid-19 that limited improvement stopped. Despite the raft of legislation, NHS regulation and exhortation, the 2023 National Guardian Office report entitled 'Fear and Futility' noted a “sharp decline in Freedom to Speak Up Guardians’ perception of the improvements in the Speak Up culture of the healthcare sector…” It noted that: “there is a growing feeling that speaking up in the NHS is futile – that nothing changes as a result.”[8] Staff safety is key to patient safety, so the fact that the majority of concerns raised are about staff safety is not a separate issue from patient safety but intimately linked.[9] So, when staff ought to—and often do—raise concerns what goes wrong? First, it has been repeatedly found by Francis (2015),[7] Kline and Warming (2024)[10] and others, that NHS staff are sceptical that raising concerns is effective and believe that by doing so it makes things worse for them personally due to victimisation.[11] Second, some staff groups are particularly sceptical of the effectiveness and/or safety of raising concerns. Kline and Warmington found that of Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) staff who did raise concerns, only 5.4% said they were taken seriously and that their problem was dealt with satisfactorily.[10] The most common outcome, in 42.7% of cases, to a race discrimination concern was nothing happening.[12] Begeny et al. (2023) revealed that within the UK surgical workforce, two-thirds of women medics (63.3%) had been subjected to sexual harassment, sexual assault and rape from colleagues, but only 16% of those impacted by sexual misconduct made a formal report.[13] Surviving in Scrubs (2023) noted a serious resulting risk to patient care from the silencing of female staff voicing concerns about such behaviours, as female staff reported that their clinical judgements were questioned, decisions were not taken seriously, clinical requests were ignored and referrals were refused.[14] Third, Mannion emphasises the importance of hierarchy in shaping behaviours: "Effective voicing of concerns is but the first stage in reshaping better safer healthcare: those with influence have to hear, and they have to act… In an intensely hierarchical organisation such as the NHS, entrenched status and power differences between professional groups can harm the development of open reporting cultures. Any attempt to address speaking up in the NHS must deal with the challenging organisational dynamic of resistance to bad news."[15] Reitz and Higgins (2020) suggest: "...power imbalance in organisational roles (as) perhaps the most important factor that makes employee silence such a common experience." They conclude that: “...instigating whistleblowing lines and training employees to be braver or insisting that they speak up out of duty, will achieve little therefore, without leaders owning their status and hierarchy, stepping out of their internal monologue and engaging with the reality of others."[16] Fourth, reputation continues to trump candour. Francis (2013) concluded that: “There lurks within the system an institutional instinct which, under pressure, will prefer concealment, formulaic responses and avoidance of public criticism’; and an institutional culture which ascribed more weight to positive information about the service than to information capable of implying cause for concern”.[4] Finally, alongside the refusal to adopt evidenced-based proactive interventions goes a lack of accountability for those whose power creates silence. Ministers have spoken strong words: “NHS managers who silence whistleblowers could be barred from working in the NHS, under proposals being announced this week.” [17] But such statements will only be effective if they are part of a wider evidence-driven strategy. In the meantime, victimisation of those raising concerns remains widespread, as recent reviews of the treatment of whistleblowers by both employers and the largest professional regulators have found.[18][19] Moreover, advice from professional regulators, as with NHS England, is very focused on individual professional accountability rather than system abuse of power.[20] Unfortunately, despite the best efforts of some NHS organisations, the conclusion Pope and Burnes reached a decade ago still stands: “The NHS exhibits too high a level of collective ego defences and protection of its image and self-esteem, which distorts its ability to address problems and to learn. Organisations and the individuals within them can hide and retreat from reality and exhibit denial; there is a resistance to voice and to “knowing.”[21] References Ely Hospital, Cardiff: Inquiry findings, Hansard, 27 March 1969. Learning from Bristol: the report of the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984 -1995. The National Archives, 2021. Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry 2010. 24 February 2010. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry - Vol. 1: Analysis of evidence and lessons learned (part 1) HC 898, Session 2012-2013. Donna Ockenden. Ockenden Report: Findings, conclusions and essential actions from the independent review of maternity services at The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust. 30 March 2024. Mannion R, Davies H. Understanding organisational culture for healthcare quality improvement. BMJ 2018;363:k4907. Freedom to speak up Review, February 2015. National Guardian Freedom to Speak Up. Fear and futility: what does the staff survey tell us about speaking up in the NHS? June 2023. Patient Safety Learning. Why is staff safety a patient safety issue? 3 September 2020. Written evidence submitted by Roger Kline and Professor Joy Warmington (NHL0074). March 2024. Correspondence. Sir Robert Francis’ Freedom to Speak Up review. 11 February 2015. Kline R, Warmington J. To hot to handle? Why concerns about racism are not heard... or acted on. January 2024. Begeny CT, Arshad H, Cuming T, et al. Sexual harassment, sexual assault and rape by colleagues in the surgical workforce, and how women and men are living different realities: observational study using NHS population-derived weights. BJS, 2023; 110(11): 1518–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad242. Cox B, Jewitt C, MacIver E. Surviving healthcare: sexism and sexual violence in the healthcare workforce. Surviving in Scrubs. November 2023. Mannion R, Blenkinsopp J, Powell M, et al. Understanding the knowledge gaps in whistleblowing and speaking up in health care: narrative reviews of the research literature and formal inquiries, a legal analysis and stakeholder interviews. NIHR 2018; 6(30). Reitz R, Higgins J. Speaking truth to power: why leaders cannot hear what they need to hear. BMJ Leader 2020; 10.1136/leader-2020-000394. DHSC. Press release. New protections for whistleblowers under NHS manager proposals. 24 November 2024. Patient Safety Learning. The whistleblower playbook. the hub. 26 June 2025. Nursing & Midwifery Council. Independent Culture Review. July 2024. General Medical Council. Speaking up. Pope R, Burnes B. A model of organisational dysfunction in the NHS. 2013. Journal of Health Organisation and Management, 2013; 27(6): 76-697. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-10-2012-0207. Further reading on the hub: Patient safety and speaking up—learning from the literature (Roger Kline) Speaking up for patient safety: A new interview series about raising concerns and whistleblowing Top picks for staff psychological safety- Posted
-
- Speaking up
- Psychological safety
- (and 4 more)
-
Content Article
The ability of healthcare staff to raise concerns safely and effectively is a cornerstone of good workforce culture and safe patient care. The extent to which employee voice is heard and acted upon is a good measure of the inclusiveness and psychological safety within teams, particularly whether concerns are raised “in the moment”. In turn, inclusiveness and psychological safety contribute to whether staff feel speaking up is safe and effective. In this review attached, Roger Kline, Research Fellow at Middlesex University Business School, explores the literature on patient safety and speaking up, arguing that staff being able to raise concerns safely and effectively is essential for patient safety, but the NHS continues to struggle with creating a culture where this happens reliably. Despite years of inquiries, policies, and the introduction of Freedom to Speak Up Guardians (FTSUGs), employee silence, fear of detriment and a sense of futility remain widespread. This review was written ahead of the publication of the Dash Review of patient safety across the health and care landscape and the NHS 10 Year Plan but the issues explored will be highly relevant to whether the Review and the Plan achieve their stated aims for quality and safety. Roger has written an accompanying blog discussing the findings of his review: Power and the sound of silence—A blog by Roger Kline- Posted
-
- Speaking up
- Organisational culture
- (and 9 more)
-
News Article
‘Cover-ups’ leave staff scared to report sexual safety concerns
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
A trust’s staff “fear raising concerns about attitudes, behaviours and sexual safety”, particularly about senior managers and doctors, a review by NHS England has found. Black Country Healthcare Foundation Trust’s “Freedom to Speak Up” arrangements have been reviewed by NHSE, following a series of cultural concerns and the departure of multiple senior directors. The review, published in board papers this month, said: “We consistently heard that staff feel that ‘cover-ups’ take place and raising a concern sometimes feels like ‘reporting a friend to a friend’.” Staff gave recent examples of where they had experienced, or seen others experience, “disadvantageous and demeaning treatment” after raising concerns. Examples of this included inconsistent application of HR policies such as annual leave and flexible working to disadvantage the person raising concerns, unkind and unprofessional behaviour by senior staff members such as ignoring individuals, and not including them in conversations. Others said they did not want to raise concerns for fear of detriment, such as bank staff members who thought they would not be given shifts. Some staff felt as if they had a “target on their back” after speaking up. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 10 February 2026 Related reading on the hub: Speaking up for patient safety interview series- Posted
-
- Staff safety
- Speaking up
- (and 4 more)
-
News Article
NHS patients put at risk by ‘sham investigations’, says ex-CEO of hospital
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Patients are being put at risk by NHS bosses launching “sham investigations” into whistleblowers to shut down concerns, a former hospital chief executive who won a £1.4m bullying claim has said. Dr Susan Gilby took over as chief executive at the Countess of Chester hospital in 2018 after it was rocked by the Lucy Letby case. She was awarded the payout – one of the biggest in NHS history – last month after a tribunal ruled she had been unfairly dismissed after raising concerns about alleged bullying and harassment by the chair of the hospital board. An employment judge found that board members of the hospital conspired to unfairly exclude her and deleted documents when she launched legal action. Speaking to the Guardian, Gilby said she had been “traumatised” by the experience and made to feel like a “pariah in the NHS” for refusing to drop her concerns in return for a “non-job”. “I feel desperately saddened that my NHS career has come to an end in the way it has. It’s had a really deep psychological impact [and] probably taken at least 10 years of working life away from me,” she said. “It’s been very isolating. People walk away when they realise you’re not willing to play by the NHS playbook and accept the offer to get you out of the situation. Doing that has resulted in being made to feel that I’m a pariah in the NHS.” Tribunal judges found that Ian Haythornthwaite, the chair of the Countess of Chester hospital NHS foundation trust, worked with three other senior figures to “engineer her dismissal” after Gilby raised a whistleblowing complaint about his “bullying and harassment”. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 1 February 2026- Posted
-
- Investigation
- Speaking up
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
Susan Gilby, the former chief executive of the Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, was awarded £1.4m in damages after a tribunal found she was unfairly dismissed by the Trust. It is one of the largest settlements of its kind in NHS history. In this interview with the British Medical Association she talks about her case and how in 2022 she was offered a 16-month ‘non-job’ to walk away quietly from the concerns she had been raising. She emphasises the importance of doctors feeling confident to blow the whistle when they have patient safety concerns and not be deterred if they face barriers. -
News Article
Letby trust pays £1.4m damages to ex CEO
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
A former NHS chief executive has been awarded £1.4m in damages after suing the health service for unfair dismissal. Dr Susan Gilby took the Countess of Chester NHS Trust to court after being suspended in December 2022. The compensation is one of the largest payments the NHS has ever made to a former employee. The final cost to the taxpayer - including court costs - could be around £3m after the trust refused offers to avoid the case going to court. Gilby told the BBC she was relieved the case was over and that this "was never about the money." The Countess of Chester NHS Trust - where Lucy Letby worked - confirmed that a settlement had been agreed. The compensation payment comes after an employment tribunal ruled in February last year that board members at the trust had conspired to remove her from her job. Gilby had accused the trust's chairman, Ian Haythornthwaite, of bullying and harassment. In response, Haythornthwaite, working alongside three other directors, had set up Project Countess, to force Gilby out. Gilby, 62, said one of the trust's directors, Ros Fallon, took her to a pub on a Friday afternoon in October 2022 and told her it was "time for you to go". "She said: 'And if you don't agree to go, we will start a process against you'. She was unable to tell me what that process would be." Read full story Source: BBC News, 15 January 2026- Posted
-
- Whistleblowing
- Speaking up
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
NHS England urged to introduce external second opinion when dismissing staff
Patient_Safety_Learning posted a news article in News
NHS England is being urged to introduce an independent second opinion whenever it decides to dismiss a healthcare professional, in memory of a nurse who set himself on fire after being unfairly dismissed from his job. Dr Narinder Kapur, an NHS whistleblower, is proposing “Amin’s rule”, named after Amin Abdullah, who killed himself in 2016, to plug a gap he says exists when it comes to staff wellbeing. Kapur, 76, a consultant neuropsychologist and visiting professor at University College London, was sacked by Addenbrooke’s hospital in Cambridge in 2010 after raising concerns about staff shortages and unqualified staff working without proper supervision. Read full story Source: Guardian, 4 January 2026 -
News Article
Trust takes control of ‘toxic’ service at ‘under siege’ neighbour
Mark Hughes posted a news article in News
A small hospital’s general surgery service is being taken over by a neighbour, after a review found “unacceptable” care standards and reported concerns about a “toxic culture”. The Royal College of Surgeons review, published today, said staff at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital King’s Lynn (QEHKL) Foundation Trust service also reported a “real disconnect between [the trust’s] senior management and the ground”. In response, the trust has said the QEHKL service will now be overseen by Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals FT’s general surgery team, under “mandated support arrangements in preparation for establishing a shared service”. Read full article (paywalled). Source: Health Service Journal, 18 December 2025 -
Content Article
Across healthcare, social care and countless other industries, safeguarding failures, misconduct and preventable workplace incidents are too often preceded by missed opportunities to act. Staff frequently suspect issues but feel unable or unsafe to speak up. Internal processes for speaking up fail to gain trust and inspection bodies rely on outdated ‘tick-box’ policies. The result? Blind leadership, compromised quality output, costly crises, avoidable trauma, damaged reputations and lost talent. In this interview, Shaun Keep and Paul Adams, founders of Say So, discuss from their experiences some of the reasons why staff don’t feel able to speak up and why and how we can change attitudes and patterns of behaviour in the workplace.- Posted
-
- Speaking up
- Organisational culture
- (and 4 more)
-
Content Article
People working in healthcare will sometimes see things at work that cause them concern, such as a situation or action that is causing or could cause harm to a patient, member of staff or the public. If you work in health and social care and have concerns that you would like to raise, here are some helpful sources of advice and information about speaking up. If you would like to add an organisation or resource to this page, please contact us. National Guardian’s Office (England) The National Guardian’s Office and the role of the Freedom to Speak Up (FTSU) Guardian were created in response to recommendations made in Sir Robert Francis QC’s report “The Freedom to Speak Up” (2015). The office leads, trains and supports a network of FTSU Guardians in England and conducts speaking up reviews to identify learning and support improvement of the speaking up culture of the healthcare sector. There are over 1,200 FTSU guardians in NHS and independent sector organisations, national bodies and elsewhere that ensure workers can speak up about any issues impacting on their ability to do their job. Find your local FTSU Guardian Guidance on how to speak up within your organisation and to regulators Email: [email protected] Phone: 0191 249 4400, 10am—4pm, Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays) Independent National Whistleblowing Office (Scotland) The Independent National Whistleblowing Officer (INWO) is the final stage of the process for those raising whistleblowing concerns about the NHS in Scotland. The INWO developed a set of National Whistleblowing Standards that set out the high level principles and a detailed procedure for investigating concerns. National Whistleblowing Standards Information about complaining to the INWO Email: [email protected] Phone: 0800 008 6112, Monday, Wednesday and Friday 9am-1pm, Tuesday and Thursday 12pm-4pm Labour Relations Agency (Northern Ireland) The Labour Relations Agency provides a free, impartial and confidential employment relations service to people engaged in industry, commerce and the public services. Services include advice on good employment practices and helping resolve disputes through conciliation, mediation and arbitration services. Workplace Information Service: 03300 555 300 Protect Founded in 1993, Protect is the UK’s leading whistleblowing charity. They aim to stop harm by encouraging safe whistleblowing and offer free expert and confidential advice on how best to raise a concern. They can also advise on the specific legal rights and protections available to whistleblowers and on some other connected rights. Contact form Advice line: 0203 117 2520, Tuesday and Thursday 9:30am–1pm, 2pm–5:30pm. Wednesday and Friday 9:30am–1pm (excluding Bank Holidays) Speak Up Direct Speak Up Direct offers free, independent, confidential advice and guidance on speaking up. They have an online tool to help health and social care staff decide the best path to take to raise their concerns. Online tool Contact form Helpline: 08000 724 725, 8am-6pm, Monday to Friday WhistleblowersUK WhistleblowersUK is a not-for-profit organisation providing help, information and support to enable you to understand whistleblowing and the best way to raise concerns or escalate them. You can submit information about your concern and situation via a crypto encrypted password-protected platform for review by a team of experts from a wide range of sectors who will suggest courses of action, which may include signposting to other organisations. Submit an anonymous, encrypted message Regulators and unions Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) Guidance on whistleblowing to the NMC General Medical Council (GMC) Guidance on raising and acting on concerns about patient safety Care Quality Commission (CQC) Report a concern if you are a member of staff British Medical Association (BMA) Raising a concern: guide for doctors Police service If you believe you have witnessed or been the victim of a crime, you should contact the police on 101. If the situation is an emergency, call 999. Patient Safety Learning is unable to offer advice on individual cases, and will always signpost you to the organisations listed.- Posted
-
- Speaking up
- Whistleblowing
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
Protecting patients (20 March 2004)
Patient-Safety-Learning posted an article in Whistle blowing
This opinion piece in the Irish Times outlines the results of an independent report into medication errors at Galway Hospice in 2004. The report uncovered medication errors and breaches of the Misuse of Drugs Act (1988) that had resulted in patient harm. It outlines the role of Dr Dympna Waldron, consultant in palliative medicine with the Western Health Board in speaking up to prevent harm to patients from medication errors.- Posted
-
- Ireland
- Whistleblowing
- (and 4 more)
-
Content Article
In this interview series, NHS whistleblower Peter Duffy and Patient Safety Learning’s Chief Executive Helen Hughes explore how the healthcare system responds when its staff raise concerns about patient safety. In each episode, Helen and Peter interview someone who has spoken up about patient safety issues in healthcare organisations, or who works to help staff raise concerns where they see unsafe care. In this interview, Peter and Helen speak to Helené Donnelly OBE, who spoke up about unsafe care she witnessed while working as a nurse at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust. Helené contributed as a witness to the inquiry led by Sir Robert Francis KC into failings at the trust and was also an advisor in the Freedom to Speak up Review in 2015, where she called for the creation of Freedom to Speak Up Guardians in the NHS. Helené explains why she decided to raise concerns about the quality of nursing care at Stafford Hospital A&E and describes the bullying and threats she received from other staff as a result. She discusses with Peter and Helen the barriers that still prevent staff speaking up today and what can be done to create a more open and responsive culture in teams and organisations. Helené highlights the need to reform how human resources departments respond to staff raising concerns and the vital role of embedding speaking up and organisational culture in the curriculum of all healthcare professional training courses. Subscribe to our YouTube podcast to keep up to date with the latest episodes. View a transcript of this interview Read a blog from Peter and Helen about the interview series- Posted
- 2 comments
-
2
-
- Whistleblowing
- Speaking up
- (and 6 more)
-
Content Article
The organisation Medical Protection are calling on NHS Trusts across England to correctly follow national guidelines, to ensure doctors are treated fairly during disciplinary proceedings. Failure to conduct disciplinary processes swiftly and fairly can also perpetuate a culture of fear amongst doctors in the NHS. This also works against improving patient safety. Openness and learning in the NHS relies on doctors having confidence in senior management and their commitment to due process, which further underlines why it is so important to get this right. A recent survey of a group of Medical Protection members who have experienced a disciplinary during the past seven years found: 53% said that the disciplinary investigation against them lasted over 1 year - 22% said the process was over 2 years. 80% said the disciplinary investigation had a detrimental impact on their mental health. 44% said that they experienced suicidal thoughts during the investigation. 72% said it affected their personal lives. 75% said the length of the investigation affected their mental health. 81% said feeling 'guilty until proven innocent' affected their mental health. 85% said the malicious nature of the allegation significantly impacted their mental health. 18% either chose to retire early or had no choice but to retire early. 24% either left the Trust, or had no choice but to leave the Trust. 13% considered leaving the medical profession due to their experience. The report identifies four themes for ensuring a ‘good’ disciplinary process. Within each of these themes, specific areas are identified where changes should be made. Theme 1: Efficient Proportionate - Trusts must consider whether a matter may be dealt with in a less formal manner before proceeding to an MHPS investigation. Any move to exclude the doctor from their duties must also be proportionate to the nature of the investigation. Timely - When a doctor is put through a disciplinary process, it should begin and conclude in a timely manner. Theme 2: Fair Fair treatment for all parties The doctor and their representatives should receive fair treatment during proceedings, with due process followed and all necessary disclosures made. NHS staff involved in carrying out the disciplinary processes should also receive adequate, specialised training; Trusts should not be relying on competence or experience. Dedicated time should be ring-fenced for those involved in an investigation to ensure that MHPS deadlines can be met. Free from bias and discrimination Steps must be taken to ensure discrimination and bias are not factors that can initiate a disciplinary investigation. Information about the importance of defence organisation and union membership should be highlighted at each induction to maximise the chances of a doctor being able to access appropriate support during an investigation. Theme 3: Compassionate Considerate - The wellbeing of the doctor subject to investigation should be considered at all times, and active steps taken to offer support and mentorship. Well communicated - The disciplinary process should be communicated clearly and in plain language at the outset, and frequent communication should continue throughout, so doctors are aware of the status of the investigation and any delays. Theme 4: Accountable Accountability of employers - When a Trust or another employer is found to have behaved in a seriously wrong way during proceedings, a clear method needs to be established to hold them to account. Scrutiny - Senior managers and Trust Boards should have greater knowledge and scrutiny of disciplinary processes. Standardised reporting and data collection, such as the inclusion of disciplinary processes in governance audits, should be rolled out.- Posted
-
- Complaint
- Investigation
- (and 7 more)
-
Content Article
In this Lancet article, Jeremy Greene reflects on Carl Elliott's book 'The Occasional Human Sacrifice: Medical Experimentation and the Price of Saying No'. He highlights a case that Elliott examines in the book, in which 80 people—mostly black patients on low incomes—were enrolled by Eugene Saenger to take part in human radiation experiments. Between 1960 and 1972, Saenger tested megadoses of total body radiation that were not primarly intended as therapy, but to observe the effects of different doses of radiation on the human body. Patients believed they were receiving a potentially life-saving therapy, but were being exploited in the name of research. Nearly a quarter of the patients died within two months of irradiation—the higher the dose, the higher the risk of death. After decades of denial, the hospital was forced to apologise only after the outcome of a Congressional inquiry, a Presidential bioethics commission, and a series of civilian lawsuits. Elliot highlights the difference in the way in which the victims and Saenger are treated in memorials at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center—Saenger is memorialised through a glass cabinet full of his medals, photographs of his research team and historical research instruments. In contrast, the victims are remembered in a small plaque overgrown by plants in the hospital courtyard, funded by the patients' families.- Posted
-
- Whistleblowing
- Speaking up
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
The annual joint whistleblowing disclosures report has been been produced as part of a collaborative initiative with nine regulators. It aims to highlight how, together as partners, the regulators are addressing serious concerns raised by health and care professionals in the UK. In 2023-24, the NMC took 225 forms of action after receiving and assessing 149 whistleblowing disclosures. Among these disclosures, the NMC referred 91 to other regulators, so they could take action. This compares to 137 disclosures that they received in the previous year, including 47 onward referrals. None of the disclosures relate to concerns about the NMC and its internal culture. The most common themes of these disclosures were: management issues; patient care; health and safety; dishonesty; communication issues; prescribing and medicines management; behaviour or violence.- Posted
-
- Whistleblowing
- Speaking up
- (and 3 more)