Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Integrated Care System (ICS)'.
-
Content Article
Why does joining up health and social care still feel so difficult in practice? And what does that mean for people navigating both systems? This long read from the King's Fund sheds light on the ‘no man’s land’ many experience at the interface between health and social care, revealing the deeper structural issues behind delays, fragmented support and growing pressure on patients and carers.- Posted
-
- Social Care
- Healthcare
- (and 4 more)
-
Event
untilNeighbourhood is the big buzzword at the moment in the health and care system. This is driven largely by the government’s vision of creating a ‘Neighbourhood Health Service’ - outlined in the 10 Year Health Plan, aiming to help people to live well in their local areas and reduce the need for care delivered in hospitals. Despite this newfound enthusiasm for neighbourhoods, neighbourhood health has actually existed long before the current use of it, often referred to as integrated care or place-based working. Within the context of potentially changing national policies and funding cuts to the very structures that can help enable neighbourhood health how can the enthusiasm for neighbourhoods match up to the reality on the ground? This King's Fund event will tackle the conceptual ambiguity around neighbourhood health with a people-first, community-led focus that enables the NHS, the voluntary sector, other public services and communities to work together as equal partners to keep people happy and healthy where they live. Join for interactive workshops, panel debates, keynote talks and case studies from people already making it work. Let’s shift the dial on improving population health and creating a neighbourhood health service that works for us all. Sessions will explore: what is a people-first approach to neighbourhood health and why it matters examples of innovative and creative approaches to neighbourhood working that put the needs of people first overcoming barriers to true neighbourhood health, including habits and behaviours, and expectations from national bodies international approaches to neighbourhood – what’s worked and what hasn’t why thinking beyond traditional transactional contracts and breaking organisational siloes is key to enabling people-first neighbourhood health. Register- Posted
-
- Community care
- Neighbourhood services
- (and 1 more)
-
Content Article
The 10 Year Health Plan sets out an ambition to build a truly modern NHS that delivers better treatment for patients and better value for taxpayers. To realise this vision, we must deliver services in new ways that better meet patients’ needs, and provide care as close to home as possible, in a way that is most convenient for them and gives them what they need when they need it. As set out in the Neighbourhood Health Framework, this will mean improving routine healthcare services, moving to a more proactive care model for people with multiple long-term conditions and delivering better alternatives to hospital care. Commissioning reform and development will support integrated care boards (ICBs) to become more expert strategic commissioners, moving to a population health approach that aligns incentives, reduces fragmentation and addresses the imbalance of resources. Commissioners will increasingly use population-based contract models to enable providers to work together to deliver joined-up care. Delivering this vision does not require disruptive organisational change. This publication sets out new population health delivery models to facilitate this change, supporting ICBs to commission providers around the needs of defined populations. ICBs – working with partners, including local authorities and health and wellbeing boards – will agree neighbourhood footprints that form clearly defined populations. Single neighbourhood, multi-neighbourhood and integrated health organisation contracts will be commissioned around these populations. Single neighbourhood providers (SNPs) will deliver services, through integrated neighbourhood teams, within a defined single neighbourhood, enabling primary care to take on new neighbourhood services that are not contracted through today’s general practice contracts – General Medical Services (GMS), Personal Medical Services (PMS) or Alternative Provider Medical Services (APMS) – which will continue to be determined nationally and commissioned locally. Multi-neighbourhood providers (MNPs) will co-ordinate the consistent delivery of services across multiple neighbourhoods. This may include delivering services directly at a larger scale than a neighbourhood or by ‘filling in’ services where an SNP is not willing or able to. Integrated health organisation (IHO) contracts will give providers a whole population health budget for a geographically defined population, underpinned by a contract. The model will empower highly capable providers to lead change through their understanding of local population need, knowledge of activity and costs, and ability to engage frontline clinicians in service redesign. IHOs will undo needless NHS fragmentation and create incentives to invest in community-based preventative care.- Posted
-
- Neighbourhood services
- Integrated Care System (ICS)
- (and 2 more)
-
Content Article
Neighbourhood health centres (NHCs) support the NHS shift towards prevention, early intervention and more integrated care delivered closer to home. The Neighbourhood health centre guidance for regions and integrated care boards sets out the practical planning instructions for developing NHCs in the current planning period. The Neighbourhood health centres: design and performance specification supports the planning and delivery of new‑build neighbourhood health centres.- Posted
-
- Neighbourhood services
- Community care
- (and 2 more)
-
Content Article
This guidance supports services to provide developmentally appropriate care for 0 to 25-year-olds. It sets out proposed actions for integrated care boards, providers and clinical teams to enable safe and effective transition between services. If adopted by systems, this approach will improve continuity of care, health outcomes and young people’s experience.- Posted
-
- Young Adult
- Children and Young People
- (and 2 more)
-
Content Article
Based on in-depth interviews with local leaders, this report from the Health Foundation explores the development and evolving role of integrated care systems (ICSs) in England, and asks what policy changes are needed to help deliver their objectives. The Labour government’s plans for the health service centre on achieving three broad shifts: more community-based care, prevention and use of digital technology. They also involve another round of NHS restructuring, including major changes to ICSs – the area-based agencies responsible for planning and coordinating services. Drawing on research conducted throughout 2025, this report provides detailed insights into local leaders’ views as the national policy context rapidly evolved around them. Overall, leaders in the research supported the broad goals of Labour’s reforms – including the shift from hospital to community – but had varied interpretations of what they meant in practice and major concerns about delivery. Policy changes introduced throughout 2025, including scrapping NHS England, cutting ICB budgets, merging ICBs across larger geographical areas and redefining the role of ICSs, were also causing widespread disruption and distracting ICS leaders from delivering on the government’s three shifts. Standing back, reforms to ICSs should not undermine the cross-sector collaboration needed to tackle the major health challenges facing the nation. Better planning and communication of the government’s reforms are now needed to avoid further disruption and distraction at local level. Policymakers will also need to actively construct the ‘strategic commissioners’ that they want ICBs to become – developing skills and capabilities within local systems and backing them with broader policy changes that make the ambition to shift resources out of hospital a reality.- Posted
-
- Integrated Care Board (ICB)
- Integrated Care System (ICS)
- (and 1 more)
-
Content Article
Claire Cox, Associate Director at Patient Safety Learning, reflects on the changing landscape of health and care in the NHS and the impact this is having on patients' and families' voices being heard and acted upon. Over the past decade, there has been increasing recognition that patient safety is not only about systems, processes and data, but also about listening carefully to the people who use health services. Patients, families and carers often see risks first, experience harm directly and notice when care does not quite join up. They move across services and settings, observe patterns over time, and are frequently the first to recognise when something feels unsafe. Their voice is a vital source of safety intelligence and an essential component of keeping people safe. And yet, at a time when patient safety is positioned as a core NHS priority, there are growing questions about whether the patient voice is becoming harder to hear. This question matters, not only in terms of experience and trust but because when patient insight is weakened or marginalised, opportunities to prevent harm may be lost.[1] A changing landscape The NHS Patient Safety Strategy sets out a clear ambition to improve safety through better insight, learning and culture. Central to this was a commitment to partnership with patients, openness about harm, and a shift from blame towards learning and improvement.[2] This was followed by the publication of the Framework for involving patients in patient safety, which explicitly recognised that patients, families and carers have a role not only in their own care, but in shaping safer systems.[3] However, alongside this, the wider health and care landscape has undergone significant structural change. Reforms have sought to simplify accountability, reduce the number of arm’s length bodies, and move towards more integrated system working through integrated care systems and integrated care boards (ICBs). While these changes aim to improve efficiency and population health outcomes, they also reshape how patient voice is gathered, represented and acted upon. Most recently, Dr Penny Dash’s review of the patient safety landscape in England proposed further consolidation, including changes with direct implications for the visibility and independence of patient voice at a national and system level.[4] These proposals include: Transferring the hosting arrangement of the Patient Safety Commissioner to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Creating a new patient experience directorate within NHS England, subsequently forming part of the Department of Health and Social Care following organisational merger. Abolishing Healthwatch England, with its strategic functions moving into the new patient experience directorate. Bringing together the work of Local Healthwatch, and the engagement functions of ICBs and providers. While these changes are intended to support efficiency and clearer accountability, they also risk making the routes through which patient experience and concerns influence decision-making less visible and more diffuse. As responsibilities are absorbed into larger and more complex structures, there is a danger not by design, but by consequence, that patient voice becomes harder to translate into meaningful action, particularly at a time when safety pressures are increasing. Is the patient voice fading—and how do we know? If the issue was only structural, it might be resolved through clearer governance arrangements. However, concerns about the patient voice appear to be wider and more deeply rooted. From a patient and family perspective, there is growing evidence of frustration and fatigue in trying to be heard. Patients affected by harm often describe long, complex processes to raise concerns, repeated requests for evidence, limited feedback and a sense that responsibility is passed between organisations. Complaints processes are frequently experienced as procedural rather than relational and focused on resolution rather than learning.[5] Families involved in high-profile patient safety cases have consistently reported that their concerns were raised early and repeatedly, yet were not taken seriously until harm became undeniable. These experiences are reflected in national reviews and the work of the Patient Safety Commissioner, which highlight systemic barriers to listening to patients and acting on their concerns.[1] There is also increasing confusion for patients about ‘where’ their voice sits in the system. As engagement functions are consolidated across providers, ICBs and national bodies, patients may be unclear who represents them, who holds power to act and how their insight contributes to improvement. This can be particularly challenging for people whose care spans multiple organisations or pathways. Importantly, these challenges are not evenly distributed. People who already face barriers to accessing care: including those with disabilities, learning difficulties, language barriers or complex needs, often experience the greatest difficulty being heard, increasing the risk of avoidable harm and inequity.[3] Taken together, these experiences create a perception that, while the language of partnership remains strong, the practical influence of patient voice may be weakening. Patient Safety Partners: opportunity and vulnerability One element of the patient safety architecture that remains unchanged—and notably unaddressed in the Dash Review—is the role of Patient Safety Partners (PSPs). Introduced through the Framework for involving patients in patient safety, PSPs are patients, carers or members of the public who contribute to organisational governance and management processes for patient safety.[3] The introduction of PSPs marked an important step forward. It acknowledged that people with lived experience, including those affected by harm, can offer valuable insight into safety governance, learning and improvement. In many organisations, PSPs are making a meaningful contribution, challenging assumptions and helping leaders to view safety through a patient lens. However, the role also carries vulnerabilities. PSPs often work within complex governance environments and may lack clarity about their purpose, influence and impact. Demonstrating tangible change can be difficult, not because their contribution lacks value but because systems are not consistently designed to capture, evidence or feed back on that impact.[3] There is also a risk that PSP involvement becomes inconsistent or symbolic, particularly under operational pressure. Without clear support, feedback loops and visible outcomes, PSPs may be left offering insight without knowing whether it has altered practice or improved safety. Why patient voice matters for safety Patient safety depends on the ability to detect risk early, learn from harm and create cultures where concerns are raised and acted upon. Patient voices often surface issues that are not immediately visible through metrics alone — such as communication failures, gaps in coordination or the cumulative impact of repeated small errors.[2] History provides stark reminders of what happens when patient voice is not listened to. The cases involving hormone pregnancy tests, sodium valproate and pelvic mesh all demonstrate how patient and family concerns were raised over many years before being acknowledged. In each case, the consequences were profound, leading to avoidable harm and, ultimately, to the creation of Patient Safety Commissioner roles in England and Scotland. When patient voice is weakly connected to influence, opportunities to prevent harm are lost. This is not about attributing blame or questioning the intent behind reform, but about recognising that structural change can have unintended consequences if patient involvement is not actively protected and strengthened.[4] How should the system respond? If there is a genuine risk that the patient voice is fading, the response needs to be deliberate and multi-level. At provider level, organisations should embed patient voice within safety governance, including supporting PSPs effectively, and treat patient insight as a core source of safety intelligence rather than optional feedback.[2] At system level, ICBs and commissioners play a critical role in ensuring patient insight informs system-wide safety priorities, clarifying accountability for patient voice across pathways, and maintaining trusted and independent routes for raising concerns.[4] At a national level, there is an opportunity to articulate clearly how patient voice fits within the evolving patient safety architecture, ensure consolidation does not weaken independence, and align patient experience, safety and improvement more coherently.[4] Policy in England has consistently emphasised partnership, co-production and learning from patients as foundations of safer care. The NHS 10 Year Health Plan reinforces this ambition, seeking to move towards a more patient-controlled NHS.[6] The patient voice does not need to be loud to be powerful, but it does need to be heard, supported and acted upon. As the NHS continues to evolve, there is an opportunity—and a responsibility—to ensure that listening to patients remains central to patient safety. The question is not whether patient voice matters, but whether enough is being done to ensure it continues to shape decisions that keep people safe. References Henrietta Hughes. Government and NHSE need to start listening to patients. Health Service Journal, 2023. NHS England. The NHS Patient Safety Strategy: Safer culture, safer systems, safer patients. 2019. London: NHS England. NHS England. A Framework for involving patients in patient safety. 2021. London: NHS England. Department of Health and Social Care. The future of patient safety: Review of the patient safety landscape in England. 2024. London: DHSC. Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. Listening and learning: The role of complaints in improving public services. London: PHSO. NHS England. The NHS 10 Year Health Plan. Fit for the Future. 2025. London: NHS England. Join the Patient Safety Partners Network In June 2023, Patient Safety Learning established the Patient Safety Partners Network. The network meets monthly in a virtual capacity and now include more than 150 Patient Safety Partners. These meetings provide a supportive and safe space to: discuss the barriers and opportunities share successes discuss how they can use their collective voice to make a difference for patient safety. Only Patient Safety Partners working with NHS organisations in England can join, although experts are often invited to present or discuss specific topics. If you are a Patient Safety Partner, you can find out more about the Patient Safety Partner Network, and how to join here.- Posted
- 1 comment
-
1
-
- Patient engagement
- Patient / family involvement
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
In October 2024, the NHS Confederation’s ICS Network gathered the views of integrated care board (ICB) leaders on the future of provider oversight. Through this exercise, we sought to clarify the position of different members and the degree of consensus that exists across ICBs in relation to the oversight framework and wider operating model.- Posted
-
- Integrated Care Board (ICB)
- Integrated Care System (ICS)
- (and 1 more)
-
Content Article
Local leaders at neighbourhood, place and system level are primed to deliver the major shift from treatment to prevention, envisaged by the new government. This guide from the NHS Confederation translates the findings of its research into the practical steps integrated care systems (ICS) can take to make the shift towards prevention. It outlines how system action can unlock prevention and, by taking a proactive targeted approach to prevention, improve outcomes and relieve some of the pressures of today, while building momentum for long-term transformation. It explores practical considerations, grounded in the realities of today’s pressures, for leaders looking to move forward decisively with the delivery of their strategic prevention agenda by demonstrating impact in the short term. It includes emerging thinking and prompt questions to support leaders in system-level discussions, together with case studies to bring to life examples of how system partners are driving forward progress in practice, based on Newton’s work around targeted, proactive prevention. -
Content Article
Boost provides a hub for innovation, idea-sharing, networking and supporting improvement efforts across the North East and North Cumbria. While Boost is hosted by the North East and North Cumbria Integrated Care Board, our community is open to anyone with an interest in driving forward change in health and care. It's an opportunity for people to come together, share good ideas, promote new solutions, as well as learn when things don't go well. Membership to our community is open to anyone with an interest in driving forward change in health and care in the North East and North Cumbria. This includes people working in the NHS, local authorities, public health, voluntary, community and social enterprise sector (VCSE), people with lived experience, private sector providers and many more. Learning Academy Improvement Stories Improvement Network Improvement System Toolkit Health Literacy Coaching Personalised Care- Posted
-
- Innovation
- Organisational learning
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
The Integrated Care Delivery Forum is a series of events and forums that showcases the challenges and opportunities of delivering integrated care across the country. Across England, 42 integrated care systems came into statutory footing in July 2022. Since then, Public Policy Projects (PPP) has been touring the country, hosting forums where health and care leaders come together for crucial debate and networking. The Forum also connects health and care leaders with industry innovators, helping to scale best practice across the sector. The focus is to connect leaders and identify what works, and what doesn’t, to improve the delivery of integrated care across the country. On the 9 May 2024, PPP held a Delivery Forum event in Birmingham. This report provides a snapshot into the discussion and debates held throughout the day. -
News Article
NHSE to slash targets in latest performance regime overhaul
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
NHS England is revising its new performance framework yet again, with a focus on slashing 77 indicators down to core priorities. Its board signed off a version of the NHS Performance Assessment Framework just six weeks ago for consultation. But HSJ understands engagement on that iteration was delayed as officials wanted to overhaul it again. The March version moved integrated care boards’ regulatory performance management role to regional teams, and promised to “prevent providers being bombarded with conflicting instructions”. But it still listed 77 “delivery metrics”, covering operating objectives; finance and productivity; public health and patient outcomes; quality and inequalities. New proposals expected this week will include significantly stripping the measures down, to primarily focus on headline performance and delivery asks in the 2025-26 planning guidance. That document axed numerous targets and asked, which health and social care secretary Wes Streeting said would allow more local autonomy. The new version will also seek to further clarify the changing roles of ICBs, providers, regions and the centre. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 12 May 2025- Posted
-
- Organisational Performance
- Integrated Care System (ICS)
- (and 1 more)
-
News Article
Government accused of misleading claim on health hubs
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Most integrated care systems lack a women’s health hub offering full services — contrary to government claims — according to research seen by HSJ. In spring last year, the government and NHS England said all systems were expected to have at least one operational women’s health hub in place by the end of December 2024. They were required to provide clinical support and consultations/triaging in eight “core” services. Health minister Karin Smyth told Parliament at the start of this year the objective had been met in 39 out of 42 integrated care systems. But research by the Menstrual Health Coalition found only 14 integrated care boards had established hubs offering all eight core services, as required. The services are: menstrual problems assessment and treatment; menopause assessment and treatment; contraceptive counselling and provision of all methods; preconception care; breast pain assessment; pessary fitting and removal; cervical screening; and screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections and HIV. The coalition, an alliance of patient and advocate groups, collected information from all ICBs between October and December. Its co-chair Anne Connolly, a GP specialising in gynaecology, said: “Our findings challenge the narrative that women’s health hubs have been successfully implemented nationwide. “While figures suggest that hubs are in place, the reality is that many do not provide the full range of services women were promised… There is now an urgent need for transparency alongside the rollout of women’s health services, particularly as the current funding is short term and lacks the necessary commitment to future-proofing these services.” Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 30 April 2025- Posted
-
- Leadership
- Womens health
- (and 4 more)
-
News Article
The systems set to gain and lose hundreds of millions
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Nine integrated care systems are set to lose hundreds of millions in NHS funding relative to others in coming years – while eight stand to make big gains – under new NHS England funding policy. New NHSE CEO Sir Jim Mackey has vowed to move systems to their “fair share” funding allocation in the next few years, and to withdraw the “deficit support” that has provided a large subsidy to some areas since Covid. It is unclear if NHSE will decide to cut their funding in real or cash terms in order to move more quickly to “fair shares”. Sir Jim has not said how quickly the change will happen, but he is seeking to remove “deficit support” as soon as next year. He said: “We will need to develop an affordable pace of change policy [for moving to fair share allocations], but I think it’s important that you can see where we are heading.” However, rapidly removing their support is likely to lead to major service challenges in these areas, or to deepening their deficit problems even further. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 10 April 2025- Posted
-
- Integrated Care System (ICS)
- Funding
- (and 1 more)
-
Event
Integrated care summit 2025
Patient Safety Learning posted an event in Community Calendar
Integrated care systems (ICSs) have existed in one form or another since 2016 and became legal entities in 2022. They were set up to form partnerships that bring together NHS organisations, the VCSE sector, local authorities and others to take collective responsibility for planning services, improving health and reducing inequalities. Almost a decade into their journey, there are clear signs that progress is being made, but it has been uneven and difficult. What does the next decade look like in the face of a continually challenging and changing landscape? This event from the King's Fund will explore how partners within ICSs can continue to meet challenges and drive improvements in health and care, including by supporting the three fundamental shifts outlined by the Prime Minister in a speech at The King’s Fund – a move from analogue to digital, from hospitals to communities, and from sickness to prevention – and how to embrace these shifts to improve services. Through a series of panel discussions, presentations and workshops, we will look at what progress has been made so far in the journey towards integration that is important to uphold, and how the government’s plans, including the 10 Year Health Plan could offer further opportunities to deliver better integrated care and drive improvements in population health. Join peers, experts and leaders to explore areas, including: how the vision of care closer to home can be realised the role digital technology can play in improving access to health and care services international comparisons that can be drawn on to improve services here the importance of focusing on prevention to improve the health of populations how system-wide solutions can be utilised to tackle workforce challenges answering the controversial questions that are often unaddressed how it feels to lead through change and what can be learnt from it. Register -
Event
The health and care system in England is undergoing significant change. With a new government setting its priorities, an ambitious 10-year health plan in development, and ongoing challenges such as workforce shortages and health inequalities, understanding these complexities is more important than ever. This is a two-day event led by The King’s Fund’s policy and leadership experts. Whether you’re navigating integrated care systems, grappling with social care reforms or seeking clarity on the pressures facing health and care, this event offers essential knowledge and balanced insights. Register- Posted
-
- Healthcare
- Community care
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Event
PPP’s third phase of its integrated care policy programme centres around the Integrated Care Delivery Forum 2024. Following a successful May event in Birmingham earlier this year, the third phase concludes with another full day in-person event, this time hosted in London. The Integrated Care Delivery Forum 2024 builds on the foundations of the ICS Roadshow and ICS Delivery Forum 2023, continuing to connect key health and care stakeholders for vital debate and networking on the future of integrated care. By connecting ICS leaders with on the ground innovators and industry experts, the Delivery Forum helps local systems grapple with workforce challenges and service pressures. The Forum is a unique platform to discover best practice and discuss new system transformation models. A new government with a fresh mandate provides new opportunities to transform health and care services. As such, the London Integrated Care Delivery Forum will be a more than timely event, providing stakeholders with a platform to debate the big issues facing the sector. The Delivery Forum will consist of three major theatres, each of which tackling a specific topic area and hosting carefully selected arrays of sector leaders. Register -
Event
untilThis conference will provide a focus on the pivotal issues concerning the future strategies of both the NHS Long Term Plan (LTP) and and integrated care systems (ICS) and will incorporate key elements of the 'Major Conditions Strategy' that is currently being developed. This major conditions strategy theme within the conference begins with one question: how should our approach to health and care delivery evolve to improve outcomes and better meet the needs of our population, which is becoming older and living with multimorbidity? With varying groups of conditions being explored in our plenaries and workshop sessions: cancers, cardiovascular disease (CVD) (including stroke and diabetes), mental ill health, and chronic respiratory disease. There are signs of positivity with exciting new technologies and sources of data that enable staff to better see and treat disease at an earlier stage. Our conference and its dedicated plenaries, evidence-based case studies and educational workshops will explore how to supercharge this agenda. Amongst our core themes will be the exploration of the potential of AI and technology to deliver digital transformations, and position the UK as a world leader in virtual health and social care. As such topics such as Virtual Wards, Remote Patient and Whole Patient Management systems will be at the forefront of certain plenaries. Also underpinning the conference's focus are the strong desires to tackle health disparities and promoting inclusion in health, as articulated through the NHS Core20PLUS5 framework, and detailed by senior host speakers on the day. The event is free for NHS staff, who can use code JBVIP100 when registering to remove all costs. Register for the conference -
Event
The landscape of commissioning, its arrangements and responsibilities are regularly shifting and can be complex. The terminology used may change but whether it is called commissioning, strategic commissioning or population health management it is important to recognise that effective health services need to be properly planned, designed and resourced – so the work of commissioning is, and will remain, vital. Join this two-day virtual event from the King's fund to be at the forefront of discussions about how the narrative around commissioning and its future is changing, and how organisations from different parts of the sector can get involved in designing and improving the services, both for those working in the health and care system and for the people and communities who use health services. Sessions will bring together individuals and teams across the health and care system to showcase different examples of how commissioning is being used to plan and transform services. These will aim to inspire you to think differently about commissioning and the way organisations can work together to achieve effective commissioning process across the health and care system. It will also explore how regions, integrated care boards and place-based partnerships will need to work together to design, improve and deliver services. You will also learn how the culture around commissioning, planning and improvement is changing as the system moves towards a more collaborative approach. Register -
Event
King's Fund: Health and care explained
Sam posted an event in Community Calendar
untilThe landscape of the health and care system in England is challenging and complex, and the system is facing profound challenges. At this event, which will take place virtually over two days, policy and leadership experts from The King’s Fund will help you gain a greater understanding of how the health and care system in England works and how it is changing, giving balanced and honest views about the pressures and opportunities it faces. In the run-up to the anticipated general election, our experts will also explore which health and care topics are likely to dominate at the election and which are not, and what this means for people working in the sector. Delegates will: make sense of how the NHS is structured and funded learn how various components at system, place and neighbourhood levels come together to create integrated care systems (ICSs) gain an understanding of the key components of primary care and the role they play in the health care system hear about health inequalities and how groups from the voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) sector support wider efforts to improve health inequalities gain a clear understanding of how the social care system is structured, who works in it, and how it is funded learn about the current pressures facing the health care workforce and what this means for the sustainability of the system have the opportunity, through a dedicated session, to ask any questions not answered throughout the event. Register- Posted
-
- Healthcare
- Organisation / service factors
- (and 2 more)
-
Event
untilIntegrated care systems (ICSs) have the potential to radically transform health and care through collaboration, long-term thinking, and by pushing the boundaries of what is possible. In this summit, we give voice to innovative thinking and practices by hearing from senior leaders and partners from both within and outside of the health and care service, who have found ways to create meaningful impact by doing things differently. Be inspired by leaders who despite challenging circumstances and a backdrop of a 30% reduction in running costs have carved out opportunities for collaboration to create transformational change. Join us at this event to be at the forefront of discussions and debate on how ICSs can work differently to meet the needs of their local populations and fulfil their original purpose. Through keynote speeches, panel debates, case studies and interactive workshops, this summit will explore: how we meet the potential of ICSs to transform health and care the importance of focusing on prevention as a way of sustainably meeting the needs of local populations, and the role data has in it how provider collaboratives and Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) can work together differently and effectively to deliver integrated care services how reconvening community services so that care is moved closer to home can potentially transform the health and care system the value of working with patients and communities to provide better services how system-wide solutions can be utilised to tackle the workforce crisis what leading in uncertainty feels like and what can be learnt from it. Register- Posted
-
- Transformation
- Leadership
- (and 2 more)
-
Event
untilThe Birmingham Integrated Care Delivery Forum is taking place on 9 May 2024. Speakers confirmed so far include: Cathy Elliott, Chair, NHS West Yorkshire ICB Pearse Butler, Chair, NHS South Yorkshire ICB Naomi Eisenstadt, Chair, NHS Northamptonshire ICB Amanda Sullivan, CEO, NHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire ICB Tapiwa Mtemachani, Director of Transformation and Partnerships, NHS Black Country ICB Dr Ananta Dave, Chief Medical Officer, NHS Black Country ICB The Integrated Care Delivery Forum is free to attend for public sector and third sector organisations. Register for the event -
Community Post
Better use of data for medication safety in hospitals
Kenny Fraser posted a topic in Medicine management
- Hospital ward
- Pharmacist
-
(and 46 more)
Tagged with:
- Hospital ward
- Pharmacist
- Integrated Care System (ICS)
- Decision making
- Information processing
- Knowledge issue
- Non-compliance
- Omissions
- Climate change
- AI
- Digital health
- Innovation
- Interoperability
- Precision medicine
- Start-Up
- Safety assessment
- Safety behaviour
- Safety management
- Improved productivity
- Medication - related
- Patient identification
- Patient safety strategy
- Policies
- protocols and procedures
- User-centred design
- Workforce management
- Information sharing
- Staff engagement
- Training
- Time management
- Allergies
- Deep vein thrombosis
- Falls
- Parkinsons disease
- Substance / Drug abuse
- Urinary tract infections
- Antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
- Benchmarking
- Dashboard
- Indicators
- Meta analysis
- Task analysis
- Workload analysis
- NRLS
- Policies / Protocols / Procedures
- Quality improvement
- Risk management
- Healthcare
NHS hospital staff spend countless hours capturing data in electronic prescribing and medicines administration systems. Yet that data remains difficult to access and use to support patient care. This is a tremendous opportunity to improve patient safety, drive efficiencies and save time for frontline staff. I have just published a post about this challenge and Triscribe's solution. I would love to hear any comments or feedback on the topic... How could we use this information better? What are hospitals already doing? Where are the gaps? Thanks- Posted
- 2 replies
-
1
-
- Hospital ward
- Pharmacist
-
(and 46 more)
Tagged with:
- Hospital ward
- Pharmacist
- Integrated Care System (ICS)
- Decision making
- Information processing
- Knowledge issue
- Non-compliance
- Omissions
- Climate change
- AI
- Digital health
- Innovation
- Interoperability
- Precision medicine
- Start-Up
- Safety assessment
- Safety behaviour
- Safety management
- Improved productivity
- Medication - related
- Patient identification
- Patient safety strategy
- Policies
- protocols and procedures
- User-centred design
- Workforce management
- Information sharing
- Staff engagement
- Training
- Time management
- Allergies
- Deep vein thrombosis
- Falls
- Parkinsons disease
- Substance / Drug abuse
- Urinary tract infections
- Antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
- Benchmarking
- Dashboard
- Indicators
- Meta analysis
- Task analysis
- Workload analysis
- NRLS
- Policies / Protocols / Procedures
- Quality improvement
- Risk management
- Healthcare
-
Content Article
There is widespread variation in the instance and quality of meaningful patient involvement across the 42 Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) of NHS England. This is seen throughout the structures, policies and processes of the ICSs, from the omission of patient representatives on decision-making bodies—such as Integrated Care Boards (ICBs)—to the neglect of clear consultation when decisions are made concerning a patient’s care. This report present the results of research and analysis conducted by the Medical Technology Group (MTG). It shows that where a patient lives is the biggest determinant to whether they are involved in their care meaningfully, or at all. It makes recommendations for the Government, NHS England and ICS's on the approach that should be taken to ensure meaningful patient engagement. Recommendations For Government The Department of Health and Social Care should publish guidance that requires patient representation on ICBs and the annual reporting of patient involvement and representation in ICB activity. The Care Quality Commission should be given more freedom to scrutinise the level of patient involvement being carried out by ICSs and ICBs. This should also take into consideration the structures for accountability and reporting on how patient feedback is considered. For NHS England NHS England should better incentivise ICBs to involve patients within decision-making structures. NHS England should encourage ICS leaders to come together to discuss best practice for patient involvement. NHS England should support ICBs to implement their ‘Working with People and Communities Strategy’ and promote the sharing of best practice nationally. For Integrated Care Systems ICBs should involve patient representatives on boards and on committees. ICBs should ensure that patient feedback loops are properly established and practiced allowing for patient input to formally contribute to the development of policy. Patient feedback should be anonymous and cover all forms of care. ICBs should ensure that there is a rolling patient satisfaction survey for patient treatments. These should be used as a management tool to improve services. ICBs should include a standing item on their Board meetings to review how effectively they consider the patient voice when making decisions regarding the delivery of care in their local area. ICSs and ICBs should first identify Voluntary, Community and Social Enterprises (VCSEs), review how they involve VCSEs, and emphasis should be placed on working collaboratively with community bodies.- Posted
-
- Integrated Care System (ICS)
- Patient engagement
- (and 2 more)
-
Content Article
Four enablers of effective collaboration between integrated care systems and ambulance services. Key points England’s ten ambulance trusts occupy a unique position in serving large health populations, each spanning footprints of multiple integrated care systems. In the context of system working and place-based models of care, ambulance trusts are negotiating emerging systems within their geographic remit, adopting new ways of working to meet the needs of diverse systems across the populations they serve. With the move away from clinical commissioning groups to the new integrated care system framework, many want to see a rethink in how systems engage with their ambulance trusts to ensure co-design and co-production from their services as part of a holistic strategy for population health. To support this, NHS Confederation interviewed a range of NHS leaders from both integrated care boards and ambulance services to explore how they might evolve their relationship, and to examine the principles that underpin effective and practical collaboration. Interviewees identified four key priorities for effective collaboration: thinking creatively about the role of the ambulance service; focusing on data sharing; fostering cultures of collaborative planning; and nurturing relationships. By focusing on these four areas, system and ambulance service leaders can design arrangements and relationships that deliver vast improvements to their population’s health in the years ahead. Interviewees made practical recommendations for national and local partners about how this can be achieved. These include expediting the implementation of Provider Selection Regime; where appropriate, developing multi-ICB governance structures; and considering how ambulance service data can be used at neighbourhood, place, system, regional and national levels to maximise its impact.- Posted
-
- Integrated Care System (ICS)
- Ambulance
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with: