Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Health inequalities'.
-
News Article
Homeless and migrant patients are being wrongly kicked off GP lists in an attempt to slash NHS spending, The Independent can reveal. Hundreds of thousands of patients have been removed from practices in England under a new scheme to “clean up” GP lists and identify patients who have left the country. But concerned doctors say they have been “distressed” to learn that many of their most vulnerable patients have been incorrectly flagged for removal, with one fearing patients with “non-English” names are overwhelmingly being targeted. Patients affected include those who are homeless, mentally unwell, in unstable housing, have learning disabilities, the elderly, or do not speak English, with no clear reason for why they are being chosen. GPs in London accounted for more than 40% of the 400,000 patients in England removed from lists between January and June. Practice leaders have warned that those patients could miss out on crucial cancer screening appointments and test results, have their hospital referrals cancelled or have their treatment delayed. Dr Lisa Harrod-Rothwell, CEO of the Londonwide Local Medical Committees, which represents London GPs, said the new system assumes patients can receive and respond to NHS correspondence via email, letter or text, but those who are homeless, have learning disabilities, or are elderly or suffer from mental health challenges would not easily be able to object to their removal. “A lot of our people already have really difficult lives because of poverty or illness, mental illness, people, the people who struggle the most with this type of [scheme] are the people who need the NHS the most. “Our concern is that this process is going to unintentionally widen our health inequalities,” Dr Harrod-Rothwell said. Read full story Source: The Independent, 17 July 2026 Further reading on the hub: Robbie: A homeless patient’s struggles with the system- Posted
-
- Health inequalities
- Long waiting list
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
Sebastian Gonzalez, hub topic lead and learning disability lead nurse at Barts Health NHS Trust, reflects on the lack of progress made in reducing health inequalities for people with a learning disability despite a number of reports and recommendations over the last few years. He highlights the new reasonable adjustment digital flag that is being implemented across the NHS, which allows the sharing of detailed information across the healthcare system about the reasonable adjustments individuals require. Sebastian asks you to explore what your organisation is doing to implement the reasonable adjustment digital flag to help identify and support patients with a learning disability. Since the publication of the Confidential Inquiry into Premature Deaths of People with Learning Disabilities (CIPOLD),[1] we have been aware of the profound health inequalities across the country. Currently, it is estimated that 1.5 million people with a learning disability live in the UK,[2] and more recent data show that, on average, adults with a learning disability die 19.5 years earlier than the general population and that 40.2% of their deaths are considered avoidable.[3] The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death report The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) is a UK based charity that reviews the quality of healthcare in order to improve patient safety and outcomes. In 2026 they published a study report: Learning Together: A Review of the Quality of Care Provided to Adults with a Learning Disability When Admitted to Hospital Acutely Unwell (NCEPOD).[4] More than a decade after CIPOLD first exposed the health inequalities experienced by people with a learning disability, the findings of this report demonstrate that significant challenges remain and that further action is needed to improve patient safety and healthcare outcomes. The study focused on adults aged 18 years and over with a learning disability who were admitted to hospital as an emergency between 1 July and 30 September 2024. Data were gathered from a range of sources, including clinician questionnaires, primary care questionnaires, organisational questionnaires, surveys completed by healthcare professionals, patients and carers, and detailed reviews of patient case notes. Key findings: Incorrect use of the terms learning disability and learning difficulty. Underuse of flagging and alert systems. Failure to consistently implement reasonable adjustments. Poor adherence to the Mental Capacity Act. Limited involvement of people with a learning disability in their own care decisions. Unequal access to specialist learning disability services. A focus on flagging and alert systems The study found that hospital services often failed to accurately identify and flag people with a learning disability. One of the key expectations introduced in 2018 through the Learning Disability Improvement Standards for NHS Trusts was that organisations should have mechanisms in place to identify and flag patients with a learning disability, autism, or both, from the point of admission through to discharge. Yet, the report highlighted that while 89.7% of the organisations reported having flagging or alert systems in place, only 52.2% of patients had these alerts. The issues were compounded by the incorrect use of the term learning difficulty, an issue well known to people with a learning disability and those that support them.[5] Furthermore, the report identified a key link between the use of flags and the provision of reasonable adjustments, highlighting how adjustments were more likely to be made when patients had been accurately identified and flagged. Moving forward Throughout the years, several reports have provided evidence of the poorer outcomes experienced by people with a learning disability and have made recommendations on how to improve their care. Despite this, it remains clear that there is still a long way to go in reducing the health inequalities experienced by this patient group. While the process of identifying and flagging patients may seem administrative in nature, it represents an essential patient safety mechanism that helps ensure individuals receive healthcare that is reasonably adjusted to meet their needs. In addition, an effective flagging system enables organisations to monitor outcomes closely, including incidents involving this group of patients. This, in turn, can support more effective service planning and ultimately contribute to improved patient outcomes. The reasonable adjustment digital flag[6] being implemented across the NHS represents an opportunity to go beyond simply identifying and flagging patients. Not only does it allow for detailed information about the reasonable adjustments individuals require, but it also promotes the sharing of this information across the healthcare system. If your role involves improving patient safety, consider exploring what your organisation is doing to implement the reasonable adjustment digital flag, and how it identifies patients with a learning disability and ensures they receive the support they need. Small changes in these areas have the potential to make a significant difference to patient experience and outcomes. References Heslop P, et al. Confidential Inquiry into premature deaths of people with learning disabilities (CIPOLD) Final report. Norah Fry Research Centre, 2013. Mencap. Learning Disability Research and Statistics. Last accessed 5 July 2026. White SA, et al. LeDeR Annual Report Learning from Lives and Deaths: People with a Learning Disability and Autistic People. The Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London. Last update June 2026. Tavaré A. Learning Together A review of the quality of care provided to adults with a learning disability when admitted to hospital acutely unwell. NCEPOD, 2026. Mencap. Learning Difficulties: Types, Causes and Symptoms. Last accessed 5 July 2026). NHS England. The reasonable adjustment digital flag action checklist: what you need to do to achieve compliance. 25 March 2024.- Posted
-
- Learning disabilities
- Health inequalities
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
AI mental health self-help tools are growing fast but protection for the people using them isn't keeping pace. This paper from David Gilbert and the Centre for Mental Health finds people’s use of AI to support mental health has outpaced the development of robust mechanisms to mitigate problems. Oversight is uncoordinated, and there are significant gaps in evidence, accountability and patient safety. While these tools may improve access and affordability for some, the paper warns that the benefits won't be distributed evenly - and that the risks of generative AI mental health systems are likely to fall disproportionately on people who are already vulnerable. Large language models can also absorb and repeat patterns of structural discrimination, reinforcing stereotypes or invalidating certain identities.- Posted
-
- AI
- Mental health
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
A growing body of global research has shown that patients from minority ethnic backgrounds are less likely to have their pain recognised, believed and adequately treated – with disparities experienced from childhood all the way through to end-of-life care. Evidence suggests these disparities persist across multiple healthcare settings, including emergency care, maternity services, and cancer treatment. Study after study from different countries has found that patients from minority ethnic backgrounds are frequently required to demonstrate higher levels of pain before receiving treatment, and are often given less effective treatment even when their pain is acknowledged. Even within childhood, those from minority ethnic backgrounds are likely to experience their pain being minimised, while receiving inadequate treatment compared with their white counterparts. A 2024 study by academics at the University of Delaware aimed to investigate whether racial bias affects how people see and interpret children’s pain, and whether this may influence how much treatment they believe a child should receive. The study consisted of participants viewing computer-generated images of children’s faces from different ethnicities showing increasing levels of pain. Pain was less readily perceived on the faces of black boys compared with their white counterparts, with participants needing to see stronger expressions of pain by black boys before recognising it. The authors argued that their study demonstrated strong evidence for racial bias in paediatric pain perception. Furthermore, participants who were less likely to perceive pain in black children were also less likely to recommend pain treatment for them.- Posted
-
- Health inequalities
- Health Disparities
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
Women from black and Asian backgrounds are less likely than their white counterparts to receive an epidural while giving birth, research has revealed. The findings, based on data collected from more than 2.7 million births in the UK, prompted experts to raise the alarm about an “ethnicity pain gap” that means people of colour are more likely to be deprived of adequate pain relief within medical settings. It comes as Guardian analysis exposes evidence of racial inequalities in pain relief offered to people across all areas of healthcare – from children in A&E to palliative care offered to cancer patients. Four medical royal colleges – the professional bodies for UK medical professions – called for better data collection on how patients from minority ethnic backgrounds are more likely to have their pain dismissed by health providers. The analysis on pain relief provided to women giving birth, published in the journal Anaesthesia, examined data collected over a 10-year period up until 2021. It found that women from a Bangladeshi, Pakistani and black Caribbean background were less likely than white women to receive an epidural while having a vaginal birth. They were 24%, 15% and 8% less likely respectively. Bell Ribeiro-Addy, a Labour MP and chair of the all-party parliamentary group on black maternal health, said the new findings left “little room for doubt that racialised assumptions are a key driver of unequal outcomes”. “The disparities around pain relief identified in this report are shocking and indefensible, but sadly not surprising, given the way black people’s pain has historically been doubted, downplayed and dismissed,” she said. She added that the findings were “inseparable from the wider context of racism and racial tropes such as the ‘strong black woman’”. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 2 July 2026 -
Content Article
On the 23 June 2025 the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (DHSC) announced a rapid, national, independent investigation into NHS maternity and neonatal services. This final report highlights key areas of concern, identifies barriers to delivering change and sets out a robust package of eight recommendations aimed at delivering long-term systemic and cultural transformation in maternity and neonatal care. It builds on an interim report published in February 2026. The report makes eight recommendations aimed to address the systemic problems identified in this report: The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) must create a statutory Maternity and Neonatal Commissioner, introducing legislation into the Health Bill at the earliest possible opportunity, and appointing a Commissioner within six months of Royal Assent. DHSC, NHS England (NHSE), Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) and NHS trusts must take action to listen to the voices of women, birthing people and families within 12 months. DHSC, NHSE and CQC must drive improvement, within 12 months, of the quality, transparency, oversight and accountability of investigations and ensure learning is captured and acted upon when things go wrong. DHSC/NHSE must design a Modern Service Framework for maternity and neonatal services within 12 months and begin rollout within 18 months. DHSC, NHSE, ICBs, NHS trusts, the General Medical Council (GMC) and the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) must treat racism, discrimination and inequality as a critical maternity safety issue – within 12 months, with work starting immediately. DHSC/NHSE must clarify existing system governance, oversight and accountability structures and improve the effectiveness of regulatory oversight within nine months. DHSC, NHSE, ICBs and NHS trusts must work with colleges, universities, post graduate educators and others to improve culture and teamworking, and strengthen leadership at all levels of the system and across professions within 12 months. DHSC/NHSE must deliver estates and digital systems that are fit for modern maternity and neonatal care with 12-month, five-year and 10-year investment commitments and implementation deadlines.- Posted
-
- Obstetrics and gynaecology/ Maternity
- Maternity
- (and 5 more)
-
Content Article
Mental health inequalities are systematic, avoidable and unfair differences in mental health outcomes between groups. Disadvantage is not evenly distributed in UK society, but follows clear patterns across geography, age, gender and socio-economic position. These differences are shaped by the social determinants of mental health – the social, physical and economic conditions that impact us across our lifespan. The Foundation Reports research series provides recommendations for decision-makers to tackle mental health inequalities in each nation, to target preventative action for the people and communities in greatest need.- Posted
-
- Mental health
- Health inequalities
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
Children who need life saving emergency surgery after a serious injury are almost six times more likely to die if in poorer countries than in wealthier ones, according to an international study led by the University of Cambridge. The research, published in The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, analysed 237 children aged 18 and under who underwent trauma laparotomy – emergency surgery for severe abdominal injuries – in 85 hospitals across 32 countries. Traumatic injuries, including those caused by road traffic accidents and violence, are among the leading causes of death and disability in children and adolescents worldwide. This study looked at children who needed emergency surgery for severe abdominal injuries, comparing their care and outcomes across hospitals around the world. Overall, 8% of children in the study died within 30 days of surgery. After taking account of differences between patients and settings, children treated in countries with lower levels of development were almost six times more likely to die than those treated in countries with higher levels of development. The study found major differences in the care children received, which are likely to be important in understanding why outcomes were worse in poorer countries. Children often faced longer delays before reaching hospital and before receiving surgery. They were also less likely to receive a blood transfusion, have a CT scan, receive medicine used to reduce bleeding, or be operated on by a consultant surgeon. Children also made up a larger share of these cases in poorer countries than in wealthier ones. This suggests that poorer countries may face a double challenge: more children needing emergency surgery after trauma, and less access to the care needed to treat them. Read full story Source: Surgery, 15 June 2026- Posted
-
- Emergency medicine
- Surgery - General
- (and 3 more)
-
News Article
Surgery ‘still looks like an old boys’ club’
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Despite increasing diversity at entry levels in the fields of medicine, this decreases at higher levels. Researchers have discovered that, despite many years of equality policies, advancement in UK surgery still largely depends on who already holds power in the room. Surgeons from underrepresented groups are more likely to leave training and face barriers to promotion, especially in environments dominated by White men in senior positions. This comes from a new study published in the Journal of Management Studies that analysed a decade of NHS career data. The findings suggest that informal networks and professional culture continue to shape careers as much as formal rules. Dr Carol Woodhams, lead author of the study and Professor of Human Resource Management at the University of Surrey, said: ‘Decisions about progression are not purely based on merit but are influenced by who is seen to “fit” the traditional image of a surgeon. In some parts of the NHS system, particularly specialist surgical fields, inequality is more entrenched. ‘In others, especially large teaching hospitals with stronger oversight and clearer procedures, the gap narrows. This suggests that organisational context plays a decisive role in shaping outcomes for staff from underrepresented groups, including their progression, retention, and experience of inequality.’ Despite increasing diversity at entry levels in the fields of medicine, this decreases at higher levels. Researchers have discovered that, despite many years of equality policies, advancement in UK surgery still largely depends on who already holds power in the room. Surgeons from underrepresented groups are more likely to leave training and face barriers to promotion, especially in environments dominated by White men in senior positions. This comes from a new study published in the Journal of Management Studies that analysed a decade of NHS career data. The findings suggest that informal networks and professional culture continue to shape careers as much as formal rules. Dr Carol Woodhams, lead author of the study and Professor of Human Resource Management at the University of Surrey, said: ‘Decisions about progression are not purely based on merit but are influenced by who is seen to “fit” the traditional image of a surgeon. In some parts of the NHS system, particularly specialist surgical fields, inequality is more entrenched. ‘In others, especially large teaching hospitals with stronger oversight and clearer procedures, the gap narrows. This suggests that organisational context plays a decisive role in shaping outcomes for staff from underrepresented groups, including their progression, retention, and experience of inequality.’ Researchers analysed the career paths of 3,402 trainee surgeons across 212 NHS trusts over 10 years, tracking promotion to consultant level and exit from training. They compared outcomes across gender and ethnicity and examined how these varied depending on workforce composition and governance structures. Dr Woodhams said: "People often assume inequality is a thing of the past because the rules have changed. But what we see here is that informal dynamics still carry significant weight. Who is recognised, supported and ultimately promoted is shaped by who already holds power." The study finds that environments with a higher concentration of senior White male surgeons tend to reinforce in-group advantages, while others face steeper barriers. However, stronger governance and transparency can counteract this, particularly in formal promotion decisions. Dr Woodhams added: "This is not about blaming individuals. It is about recognising that systems and cultures matter. The encouraging part is that change is possible. Where organisations take accountability seriously and make processes clearer, inequalities begin to shrink." Read full story Source: Surgery, 17 June 2026- Posted
-
- Surgeon
- Surgery - General
- (and 2 more)
-
Content Article
Over the past year, The King’s Fund has been running a project exploring how different groups of men think about their health and how they experience health services. The work was commissioned by the Department of Health and Social Care through the National Institute for Health and Care Research as part of wider work on the Men’s Health Strategy for England, which sets out a vision and a national commitment to address men’s poorer health outcomes and lower engagement with services. Chris Branson, Fellow at The King's Fund, shares six key insights from conversations with men about their health – and how to shape more effective future services.- Posted
-
- Mens health
- Communication
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
This report contains feedback from focus groups the Patients Association ran across six language backgrounds – Arabic, Bengali, Portuguese, Punjabi, Romanian and Urdu – and research on those who speak English as an additional language, highlighting the numerous barriers to care that they face. Some of the barriers highlighted include a need for quality and personalisation in translations, reliance on community members as informal interpreters and medical jargon as a barrier even with interpretation. -
Content Article
To mark Learning Disability Week 2026, this episode of Voices for Safety explores a critical patient safety issue: the inequalities people with a learning disability face when accessing cancer care. Host Dr Louise Gorman speaks with Dr Oliver Kennedy, an NIHR Clinical Lecturer at the University of Manchester and a Medical Oncologist at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, whose research uncovers stark inequalities across the cancer care pathway in the UK. Drawing on a large-scale NIHR-funded study of over 180,000 people with learning disabilities, Dr Kennedy explains how they are less likely to be referred for specialist tests, more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage, and around half as likely to receive treatment, resulting in much shorter survival times. Together, they explore why these gaps exist – from communication challenges and diagnostic overshadowing to systemic barriers in screening and treatment – and discuss what needs to change across prevention, diagnosis, and care to create a more equitable system. Released during Learning Disability Week 2026, this episode highlights the urgent need for more inclusive, accessible healthcare systems and the importance of ensuring everyone can receive timely, effective, and safe cancer care. Further reading on the hub: Top picks: Breaking down the barriers faced by people with learning disabilities- Posted
-
- Health inequalities
- Cancer
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
Sickle cell disease can affect people of all backgrounds but is more common in African and Caribbean communities. It has become one of the fastest growing genetic conditions in England, with 250 new cases every year. People living with sickle cell disease may experience painful crises, fatigue and an increased risk of serious health complications. Despite this, the condition is often not well understood. At Patient Safety Learning we believe that sharing insights and learning is vital to improving outcomes and reducing harm. That's why we created the hub; to provide a space for people to come together and share their experiences, resources and good practice examples. We have pulled together 8 useful resources about sickle cell disease that have been shared on the hub. They include recommendations on tackling inequalities, recognising and managing sickle cell disease in hospital, and managing pain. 1 Sickle Cell Society: Standards for the clinical care of adults with sickle cell disease in the UK These standards for the clinical care of adults with sickle cell disease were produced by the Sickle Cell Society in collaboration with a broad multi-disciplinary group of healthcare providers, patients and support groups. 2 The King's Fund: The implicit bias of sickle cell disease Although health outcomes have improved, evidence shows that people with sickle cell still feel marginalised. Their frustrations largely stem from a perceived lack of empathy in a healthcare system that does not fully recognise their struggles. When compounded with limited treatment pathways, these poor experiences leave many feeling neglected and unsupported. This blog from CJ Nwasike discusses sickle cell health inequalities. 3 Sickle cell comparative review to inform policy report: Providing evidence-based recommendations to tackle inequalities This study analysed data across a wide range of indicators and revealed striking inequalities, which were often reflected in the experiences of patients living with sickle cell across the country. The report adds further to the urgent need to address the underlying problems affecting the quality of care for patients with sickle cell. Importantly, this comparative research shows that improvements are also needed for other severe chronic conditions, such as cystic fibrosis and haemophilia, and that lessons can be learned from successes achieved in other specialties. This report includes a set of recommendations that aim to help tackle inequalities associated with sickle cell in the UK. 4 HSSIB: Invasive procedures for patients with sickle cell disease This investigation from the Health Services Safety Investigations Body sets out to review the care of patients with sickle cell disease who need to have an invasive procedure. Invasive procedures involve accessing the inside of a patient’s body, either through an incision (cut) or one of the body’s orifices. Specifically, the investigation focused on: how haematology teams – the specialists who treat people with blood disorders – are involved and informed when a patient with sickle cell disease is treated in another area of healthcare how patients with sickle cell disease are prepared for invasive procedures how and where clinical information relevant to the patient is shared. 5 HSSIB: Management of sickle cell crisis In this investigation, HSSIB used a real patient safety incident to explore how sickle cell crises are managed within hospital settings. In particular, the investigation considered: the knowledge nursing staff may have about the care of patients in sickle cell crisis how patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) – where a patient can use a device to give themself doses of pain relief medication – is considered holistically, such as monitoring the patient and staff workload. 6 Sickle Cell Society: 'The difference between life and death' Following on from the care failures highlighted in the 2021 report, 'No one's listening', this Sickle Cell Society report takes a deeper look at sickle cell nursing care. The findings show the need for vastly more resources, training and support in this critical area of care. The report highlights that not only is no-one listening, but that lives are still being put at risk. 7 Treating chronic pain in sickle cell disease — The need for a biopsychosocial model Clinicians are often unsuccessful at addressing chronic pain in sickle cell disease. In this perspective article in the New England Journal of Medicine, Childerhose et al. discuss how a biopsychosocial model can help capture people’s experience of chronic pain by affirming that biologic, neuropsychological, and socioenvironmental elements play a role in pain-related processes. 8 Sickle cell digital discovery report: Designing better acute painful sickle cell care The report explores the range of technology that is in place for accident and emergency clinicians, red-cell specialists, and ambulance care, to aid timely support to patients with sickle cell on their emergency hospital arrival. A number of focus groups and interviews were carried out with those that have lived experience of the disease, including patients who have suffered acute, painful sickle cell episodes during NHS A&E admissions. Research found a lack of individual care plans in place and, more broadly, no clear definition of what constitutes an actual care plan. A number of recommendations are set out in the report for the NHS and the wider healthcare system. Do you have a resource on sickle cell disease to share? We’d love to hear about it - leave a comment below or join the hub to share your own post.- Posted
-
- Sickle cell
- Top picks
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
Learning Disability Week is the third week of June every year. The event, organised by the charity Mencap, is an opportunity to raise awareness about different learning disabilities and challenge some of the barriers people who have learning disabilities face. According to Mencap, a learning disability is a person's reduced intellectual ability, meaning they can face difficulty with everyday activities. People with a learning disability can sometimes need extra support to learn new skills, understand complicated information or interact with other people. It can be particularly challenging for people with learning disabilities and their families when accessing healthcare services. To mark Learning Disability Week, we are sharing 18 resources, blogs and reports from the hub for patients, their families and healthcare professionals on breaking down these barriers. 1 Exploring the inequalities of women with learning disabilities deciding to attend and then accessing cervical and breast cancer screening, using the Social Ecological Model Women with learning disabilities are less likely to access cervical and breast cancer screening when compared to the general population. In this study, the Social Ecological Model was used to examine the inequalities faced by women with learning disabilities in accessing cervical and breast cancer screening in England. The authors suggest that multiple methods to reduce the inequalities faced by women with learning disabilities are needed, and that these can be achieved through reasonable adjustments. 2 Pharmacists can do more to bridge the safety gaps for people with learning disabilities People with learning disabilities are more likely to be taking multiple medicines, but labels are not designed with them in mind. This article in the Pharmaceutical Journal looks at a project run by a team at Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust. The team ran exploratory workshops to listen to how people with learning disabilities engaged with information on medicines at home, at the doctors and at the pharmacy. The project highlighted that it is time to move away from standard labels and look towards more personalised medicine labels, actively promoting ways to support people with learning disabilities in taking their medicines. 3 Exploring deep sedation at home to support people with learning disabilities to access medical investigations with minimal distress In this blog, Mandy Anderton, a Clinical Nurse specialising in learning disability, explains how they are using shared decision making and reasonable adjustments to implement a new care pathway, where patients with a learning disability needing to undergo a medical investigation can receive deep sedation within their own home. Working with patients, carers, relatives, anaesthetists and others, the aim is to improve access to important medical investigations with minimal distress, where other avenues have been exhausted. 4 NHS England: Ask Listen Do – feedback, concerns and complaints Ask Listen Do resources are designed to support organisations to listen, learn from and improve the experiences of children and adults who are autistic or have a learning disability, their families and carers, and make it easier for people, families and paid carers to give feedback, raise concerns and complain. 5 NHS England: Guidance to support implementation of the Mental Capacity Act in acute trusts for adults with a learning disability This guidance supports trusts and community providers in enabling frontline staff to fulfil their legal requirements under the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005, specifically when supporting people with a learning disability. Leadership within Trusts have been asked to ensure they understand the guidance, take the actions indicated and make these resources available to all frontline staff. 6 Tommy Jessop: Why I investigated hospital care for people like me People with a learning disability are more than twice as likely to die from avoidable causes than the rest of the population. Actor Tommy Jessop and BBC Panorama investigated some of the stories of families who say they were let down by their medical care. 7 How can GP practices help improve health outcomes for people with learning disabilities? In this Patient Safety Learning interview, Mandy Anderton explains some of the barriers people with a learning disability face in accessing safe care and how adjustments can be made within GP practices to improve outcomes. Mandy lists national improvements that she believes would reduce health inequalities in this area. 8 Making reasonable adjustments for patients with a learning disability is G.R.E.A.T. Developed by David Havard, this poster shows a number of ways in which reasonable adjustments can easily be made for patients with a learning disability. 9 How the reasonable adjustment digital flag can help identify and support people with a learning disability Sebastian Gonzalez, hub topic lead and learning disability lead nurse at Barts Health NHS Trust, reflects on the lack of progress made in reducing health inequalities for people with a learning disability despite a number of reports and recommendations over the last few years. He highlights the new reasonable adjustment digital flag that is being implemented across the NHS, which allows the sharing of detailed information across the healthcare system about the reasonable adjustments individuals require. 10 HSSIB: Caring for adults with a learning disability in acute hospitals The aim of this investigation and report is to help improve the inpatient care of adults with a known learning disability in acute hospital settings. It focuses on people referred urgently for hospital admission from a community setting, such as a person’s home or residential home. 11 Video: The Oliver McGowan Mandatory Training on Learning Disability and Autism This animation aims to help staff and employers across health and social care understand Oliver's Training and why it is so vitally important. It was co-designed and co-produced with autistic people and people with a learning disability. Oliver McGowan died aged 18 in 2017 after being given antipsychotic medication to which he had a fatal reaction. He was given the medication despite his own and his family's assertions that he could not be given antipsychotics, and the fact that this was recorded in his medical records. The animation tells his story and highlights the increased risks facing people with learning disabilities and autism when accessing healthcare. 12 Palliative Care for People with Learning Disabilities The Palliative Care for People with Learning Disabilities (PCPLD) is a charity created to ensure that patients with learning disabilities receive the coordinated support they need throughout their life. The PCPLD Network brings together service providers, people with a learning disability and carers working for the benefit of individuals with learning disabilities who have palliative care needs. 13 Nobody left behind: Improving the health of people with learning disabilities and reducing inequalities across primary care Mandy Anderton talks in depth about the cross-system programme they launched in Salford to improve the health of people with learning disabilities and reduce inequalities across primary care. Mandy shares their award-winning poster, summarising the programme’s activities and outcomes, and gives her top tips for delivering a successful patient safety improvement project. 14 Reasonable adjustments and designing services for patients and people with learning disabilities Caring for people with learning disabilities in an acute hospital setting can be challenging, especially if that patient has transitioned from children’s services to adult services. The experience in children’s acute care differs to adult acute care; this difference in processes of care can cause great anxiety for the patient and their family and carers. The reasonable adjustments that were perhaps made and sustained in children’s services may now not exist. The purpose of this blog is to demonstrate the importance for services to be designed around patients’ needs with patients, families and carers. If we get this right, the quality of care given will be improved, patient satisfaction increases and, in turn, a reduction in patient harm. 15 Cervical screening for people with learning disabilities: Learning resource for sample takers (NHS Wessex Cancer Alliance) Cervical cancer is preventable. By 2040 the NHS in England is aiming for a cervical cancer incidence rate of below 4 per 100,000 women (elimination status). To achieve this, we need to increase HPV vaccination rates and improve attendance for routine cervical screening particularly in younger people and underserved communities including patients with learning disabilities. This learning resource from the NHS Wessex Cancer Alliance explains the misconceptions and barriers to cervical screening, the consent and best interest decisions, and the role of the sample taker and the reasonable adjustments that can be made. 16 Safety spotlight: Mothers with a learning disability - Maternity and Newborn Safety Investigations (MNSI) Maternity care should be responsive to every woman’s needs. This Maternity and Newborn Safety Investigation (MNSI) safety spotlight focuses on mothers with a learning disability. 17 HSSIB investigation. Insulin: supporting safe self-administration for patients in the community with a disability Many people with diabetes manage and administer their own insulin, either by injection or using a combined monitor/pump device (a hybrid closed loop system). However, a disability or impairment may affect their ability to safely manage their own insulin if they are not supported. This can lead to short-term and long-term health problems, which can be life threatening. This Health Services Safety Investigation Body (HSSIB) investigation explored the the following areas in relation to the patient safety issue: supporting the development of people’s competency – that is, their skills, experience, knowledge and ability – to manage insulin recognising and responding when people’s circumstances change, such as deterioration in a disability assessment of people’s mental capacity to make decisions in relation to insulin. 18 Learning Together - A review of the quality of care provided to adults with a learning disability who were admitted to hospital acutely unwell The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) reviewed the care of adults with a diagnosed learning disability who attended/were admitted to hospital as an emergency between 1 July and 30 September 2024. The recommendations highlight areas that are suitable for regular local clinical audit and quality improvement initiatives by those providing care to this group of patients. 19 Voices for Safety podcast: Unequal cancer care for people with a learning disability in the UK This episode of Voices for Safety explores a critical patient safety issue: the inequalities people with a learning disability face when accessing cancer care. Host Dr Louise Gorman and Dr Oliver Kennedy explains how they are less likely to be referred for specialist tests, more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage, and around half as likely to receive treatment, resulting in much shorter survival times. They explore why these gaps exist – from communication challenges and diagnostic overshadowing to systemic barriers in screening and treatment – and discuss what needs to change across prevention, diagnosis, and care to create a more equitable system. Do you have a resource or story to share about learning disabilities? Could your insights or experiences help improve patient safety? Leave a comment below (join the hub for free first) or contact us at [email protected].- Posted
-
- Learning disabilities
- Learning disorders
- (and 5 more)
-
Content Article
C-sections are a common procedure in maternity care, but higher rates of emergency caesareans can be a sign of systemic issues. In this article the authors analyse a chart presenting Health Episode Statistic (HES) 2023/24 data to explore the intersection of ethnicity and socio-economic deprivation in shaping the likelihood of emergency C-sections in England. They found that there were higher rates of emergency C-sections among women and people giving birth from Black and Asian ethnic groups than from the White group, regardless of deprivation quantile. This data adds to a growing body of evidence that maternal health outcomes in the UK are not equal.- Posted
-
- Health inequalities
- Ethnicity
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
The NHS Alliance: Improving health literacy in the NHS (1 October 2025)
Clare Hinkley posted an article in Barriers
Health literacy refers to an individual’s ability to understand and interpret information about their health status or their interactions with healthcare services. It therefore impacts the extent to which individuals can effectively access and engage with health services. Health literacy is also closely correlated with health inequalities. Research has found that children born in communities with significant reading challenges have particularly low life expectancy rates. In order to achieve equitable access to quality healthcare, we must address the issue of health literacy gaps. This guide explores what is meant by health literacy, the benefits of applying health literacy interventions, recommendations for trust board members, and case studies from five trusts that have effectively embedded interventions. -
Event
untilThis webinar for Patients Association Patient Partnership Week will explore the inequities that shape patients’ access to treatment and care, and why many people still face barriers to receiving timely, effective support. The discussion will examine the structural challenges within the health system that affect uptake and adoption of treatments, including why innovations can take so long to reach patients in practice. Panellists will also consider the significant regional variation in access to care, and the impact this has on outcomes and patient experience. Importantly, the session will focus not only on identifying the problems, but on exploring practical solutions to create a fairer, more equitable system for all patients. Speakers Will Pett, Interim Director of Policy & External Affairs at Healthwatch England Giles Lomax, CEO, Spinal Muscular Atrophy UK Kirstin Spencer, patient Register -
Content Article
Rare conditions affect over 3.5 million people in the UK. People affected by rare conditions face profound systemic inequity, often experiencing a complicated diagnostic odyssey followed by fragmented care and limited access to treatments. The Genetic Alliance UK 'Equity for Rare' consultation highlights the inequities the rare conditions community experiences, and found that equity broadly means ensuring that people with rare conditions can navigate the healthcare system with the same dignity and efficacy as those with common conditions. While common conditions are not without their own challenges, they often benefit from established clinical infrastructure, visibility and prioritisation. By contrast, those with rare conditions must navigate a system fundamentally not designed for their specific needs. This report acknowledges that rarity is seldom a standalone challenge and it intersects with broader drivers of inequity such as ethnicity, gender, and socio-economic status. This report adopts a narrower focus, highlighting that a defining, and immutable, characteristic of all rare conditions in their small patient population. It centres this analysis on how this scarcity is a fundamental driver of inequity for all rare conditions, resulting in three systemic challenges: low priority, limited evidence, and low clinical familiarity. Overcoming these three challenges is essential to delivering a fair healthcare system for those affected by rare conditions. Genetic Alliance UK is calling on the governments of the UK to: Deliver a UK-wide map of rare conditions: The four UK nations must urgently fund comprehensive rare condition registries and work in partnership to map all 7,000 rare conditions. Robust national data infrastructure is not optional, it is the foundation of equitable service planning, resource allocation, and healthcare delivery. Close the evidence gap through fair research investment: Government and research funders must correct the imbalance in research investment by directing funding towards rare conditions. Decision-makers must also reform evidence standards to recognise that uncertainty is an inherent feature of rare conditions and should not be used as a barrier to access or innovation. Mandate system-wide accountability for rare conditions: Healthcare systems must stress-test policies, commissioning decisions, and service delivery frameworks against the realities of low-prevalence conditions. This must include systematic auditing to identify gaps, eliminate inequities, and enforce consistent standards of clinical accountability across all services. Embed rare conditions into mainstream healthcare delivery: Current reforms across the UK healthcare system present an opportunity to fully integrate rare condition care into routine service provision. Failure to act now will entrench existing health inequalities for the 1 in 17 people in the UK that will be affected by a rare condition at some point in their life. Commit to a bold successor to the UK Rare Diseases Framework: UK governments must commit to a long-term successor to the UK Rare Diseases Framework that delivers measurable improvements for people with rare conditions. This successor must set clear targets, and the nations must respond with adequate funding, directly addressing the structural drivers of inequity identified in this report. Further reading on the hub: Top picks: Rare diseases -
News Article
Weight loss drugs could widen health inequalities, experts warn
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Weight loss jabs are transforming obesity treatment, but without access to affordable healthy food and ongoing support they could widen health inequalities in the UK, experts have warned. The injections, also known as GLP-1 receptor agonists, are taken by an estimated 2.4 million Britons and work by mimicking the natural hormone which regulates blood sugar, appetite and digestion. Although drugs such as Wegovy and Mounjaro have transformed weight-loss treatment, researchers at Cambridge University and University College London (UCL) have argued that their long-term benefits depend on diet, exercise and healthcare support. “We have highlighted that obesity treatment is not just a medical issue, but a social and structural one. Without integrated dietary support and attention to food affordability, these medications could deepen existing health inequalities,” Dr Adrian Brown at UCL Medicine said. “The key message is clear: these treatments are powerful, but their long-term public health impact will depend on whether the right support systems are in place to ensure equitable and safe access for all patients,” he added. The report, published in the journal Nature Medicine, warned that healthier diets are often more expensive, and on top of the cost of weight-loss jabs, are unaffordable for many. Dr Marie Spreckley from Cambridge University said: “The key question is not simply who can access these medications, but who can benefit from them in the long term. If access to healthy food, nutrition support and ongoing care is uneven, there is a risk that the benefits of these treatments will also be uneven.” Read full story Source: The Independent, 1 June 2026 -
News Article
Streeting’s NHS home-working revolution ‘puts patients at risk’
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Patients risk having serious conditions missed by doctors working from home under an NHS revolution championed by Wes Streeting. Doctors will deliver millions of virtual hospital appointments at their convenience – and from their own homes – as part of plans to tackle the NHS backlog that Mr Streeting set out when he was health secretary. However, health leaders and patient groups are concerned about patients falling through the cracks and the risk that serious conditions such as cancer could be missed. They also fear the creation of a “two-tier” health system in which the digitally capable are “fast-tracked” while others who are older or more vulnerable are forced to wait longer for care. The new “Online NHS Trust” will be officially formed on 1 June and start seeing patients from October 2027, The Telegraph can disclose. Patients facing some of the longest waits will be the first to test the new service, with the virtual hospital to be piloted on gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology and ophthalmology. Patients referred to a consultant will have the option to connect remotely to one of the specialists across the country via the NHS app – with more specialities and conditions added over time. But concerns gathered by Healthwatch, an official health service body that represents patients, have warned that serious conditions such as cancer could be missed in video calls. And one patient advocate said it was “described as being optional, but in reality, if there is a long waiting list for an in-person appointment, the patient may ‘choose’ the online appointment instead, eg if the GP says it’s a shorter waiting time to get seen online, it is not a fair choice”. Read full story (paywalled) Source: The Telegraph, 18 May 2026- Posted
-
- Home
- Digital health
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
The Health Services Safety Investigation Body (HSSIB) released a new briefing, in partnership with the NHS Race and Health Observatory (NHSRHO), to raise awareness and encourage positive change around bias and discrimination in patient safety investigations at all levels across the NHS. This briefing is informed by contributions from a national roundtable held in November 2025. This collaborative event brought together individuals with lived experience, patient advocates, clinicians and senior healthcare leaders. The briefing identified a series of recommendations, which include: embedding explicit consideration of racism within investigation standards improving expectations for family involvement strengthening leadership accountability for equity ensuring more consistent use of data to identify inequalities anti-racism to be a core component of patient safety investigations robust mechanisms to monitor implementation and impact.- Posted
-
- Investigation
- Bias
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
Communication during a medical encounter can be challenging, even when both the patient and their healthcare provider speak the same native language. So, imagine the added difficulty of discussing symptoms, diagnoses, and treatment when there’s a language barrier. Research shows that such communication issues can lead to longer hospital stays, greater risk of falls, delayed diagnosis and treatment, medication errors, and even death. An analysis of safety events reported in Pennsylvania—where more than 1.4 million residents speak a non-English language at home and more than 500,000 have limited English proficiency—reveals that language barriers continue to pose a risk to patient safety, despite policies requiring certified interpreters and translated materials be available to patients who need them. Patient Safety Authority researchers identified 336 events reported to the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (PA-PSRS) in 2024 relating to language barriers. The two languages most commonly involved in these reports were Spanish and Nepali, with issues including the lack of a certified interpreter, the lack of translated materials, and materials with inaccurate or incomplete translations. This study closely examines the interpretation and translation challenges faced by Pennsylvania patients and providers, and how they affect patient safety. It also provides strategies and recommendations for facilities to supplement available language services, such as hiring staff bilingual in English and the common languages of the service area and explaining common procedures with visual aids and pre-translated materials.- Posted
-
- Communication
- Health inequalities
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
NHS rollout of artificial pancreas narrows inequality in diabetes care
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
The rollout of a “life-changing” artificial pancreas on the NHS for people with type 1 diabetes has helped to narrow ethnic and socioeconomic inequality within access to treatment, according to figures for England and Wales. Officially known as a hybrid closed-loop system, an artificial pancreas comprises three interconnected parts: a sensor worn on the body called a continuous glucose monitor; an algorithm either built into the pump or on a separate device such as a phone that calculates the precise dose of insulin needed; and an insulin pump that delivers the dose into the bloodstream. For patients, the device removes much of the mental burden of managing blood sugar levels, especially around mealtimes and during the night. According to previous clinical trials, the device is more effective at managing diabetes than current diabetes technology, such as using continuous glucose monitors alone. Previous rollouts of diabetes technology have had stark disparities in uptake regarding ethnicity and deprivation. Studies have shown that people from minority ethnic backgrounds in England are less likely to have access to continuous glucose monitors, while people from deprived backgrounds have been unable to have full use of this tech. However, the first two years of the artificial pancreas rollout in England and Wales has been seen to reverse this trend, with only a 3% difference in uptake between people from the most and least deprived backgrounds, as well as those from minority ethnic backgrounds compared with white counterparts. Naiha Shafiq, 27, from London, was fitted with an artificial pancreas three years ago. She said the device had been “life-changing” because she was previously in and out of hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis, a life-threatening complication, as a result of struggling to administer her insulin injections. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 19 May 2026- Posted
-
- Medication
- Diabetes
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Event
Webinar on equity and access in healthcare
Patient Safety Learning posted an event in Community Calendar
Equity and access are central to safe, fair, and people-centred healthcare. Yet many patients continue to face financial, geographic, cultural, and system-level barriers that limit their ability to receive timely and quality care. This webinar, organised by the WPA Asia Pacific Region Steering Committee, will bring together experts, patient advocates, and health leaders to explore how patient organizations can help identify barriers, generate evidence, influence policy, and improve access to services, medicines, and diagnostics. Through expert presentations and a focused panel discussion, the session will highlight regional experiences from the Asia Pacific region while offering insights relevant to a global audience. Speakers will share practical examples of patient-led action, collaboration with health authorities, and approaches that strengthen fairness, accountability, and sustainable system improvement. Learn about the main equity and access challenges experienced by patients, with emphasis on the Asia Pacific region. Hear expert insights on how patient organizations can drive policy and service improvement. Discover practical examples of patient-led initiatives that strengthen fairness, accountability, and access to care. Gain understanding of how patients and patient organizations can work with health authorities to improve health system performance. Register