-
Posts
4,730 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Patient-Safety-Learning
PSL ModeratorsContent Type
Communities
Learn
News
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Patient-Safety-Learning
-
Content Article
In this blog, consultant rheumatologist and RCP Digital Health Clinical Lead Anne Kinderlerer looks at how digital solutions could improve patient care and safety in outpatients. She highlights that existing triage systems make it difficult to manage risk across pathways and outlines how digital tools might enable patients to access the right support at the time when they most need it. She also describes why increasing interoperability and sharing of data between primary and secondary care will be vital to improving how the health service predicts and manages risk, reducing health inequalities and preventing patients getting 'lost in the system'.- Posted
-
- Electronic Health Record
- Outpatients
- (and 6 more)
-
Content Article
There is currently little research about the clinical management of people recently discharged from inpatient psychiatric care who die by suicide. This study in BJGP Open aimed to improve understanding of how people discharged from inpatient mental health care are supported by primary care during this high-risk transition. The authors carried out a nested case-control study using interlinked primary and secondary care records for people who died in England within a year of discharge between 2001 and 2019. Key findings included: Over 40% of patients who died within two weeks and 80% who died later had at least one primary care consultation. There was infrequent evidence of discharge communication from hospital. Within-practice continuity of care was relatively high. Those who died by suicide were less likely to consult within two weeks of discharge. They were more likely to consult in the week before death, be prescribed multiple types of psychotropic medication, experience readmission and have a diagnosis outside of the ‘Severe Mental Illness’ definition. The authors concluded that healthcare professionals working in primary care have opportunities to intervene and should prioritise patients experiencing transition from inpatient mental health care. Clear communication and liaison between services is essential to provide timely support.- Posted
-
- Mental health
- Primary care
- (and 6 more)
-
Content Article
The Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (PA-PSRS) is the largest database of patient safety event reports in the United States. This study in Patient Safety analysed more than 23,970 healthcare association infection (HAI) reports submitted by long term care facilities in Pennsylvania in 2023. The results showed an increase in the number of reports of HAIs submitted.The overall infection rate increased by 11.4%, from 0.88 in 2022 to 0.98 in 2023, and all six regions of the state had an increase in infection rate. The Northeast region had the highest rate, with 1.28 reports per 1,000 resident days, and the Southeast region had the lowest rate, at 0.72. The overall rate increase was driven by rates of urinary tract infection (UTI) and skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI), which increased by 20.1% and 17.4%, respectively. Within the UTI infection type, symptomatic urinary tract infection (SUTI) rates increased by 21.1% and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) rates increased by 11.8%. -
Content Article
The Joint British Diabetes Societies (JBDS) for Inpatient Care group was created in 2008. It aims to improve inpatient diabetes care by developing and promoting high quality evidence-based guidelines and creating better inpatient care pathways. The JBDS–IP group was created and supported by Diabetes UK, ABCD and the Diabetes Inpatient Specialist Nurse (DISN) UK group, and works with NHS England, TREND-UK and with other professional organisations. This webpage contains guidance on a wide range of subjects relating to inpatient care for people with diabetes, including: The hospital management of hypoglycaemia in adults with diabetes mellitus The management of diabetic ketoacidosis in adults Management of adults with diabetes undergoing surgery and elective procedures: improving standards Self-Management of diabetes in hospital Glycaemic management during enteral feeding for people with diabetes in hospital The management of the hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state (HHS) in adults with diabetes Admissions avoidance and diabetes: guidance for clinical commissioning groups and clinical teams Management of hyperglycaemia and steroid (glucocorticoid) therapy The use of variable rate intravenous insulin infusion (VRIII) in medical inpatients Discharge planning for adult inpatients with diabetes Management of adults with diabetes on dialysis Managing diabetes and hyperglycaemia during labour and birth with diabetes The management of diabetes in adults and children with psychiatric disorders in inpatient settings A good inpatient diabetes service Inpatient care of the frail older adult with diabetes Diabetes at the front door The management of glycaemic control in people with cancer COncise adVice on Inpatient Diabetes (COVID:Diabetes) - hyperglycaemia Optimal staffing for a good inpatient diabetes service Using technology to support diabetes care in hospital- Posted
-
- Diabetes
- Medicine - Diabetes and Endocrinology
- (and 4 more)
-
Content Article
Diabetes - What the tech? poster (June 2024)
Patient-Safety-Learning posted an article in Diabetes
There has been an big increase in the use of diabetes technology in the NHS recently, especially in type 1 diabetes. Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are now standard care for people with type 1 diabetes, and work has begun to increase access to hybrid closed loop (HCL) systems, which are sometimes referred to as an 'artificial pancreas'. Along with this expansion, it is important to raise awareness of these devices when people with diabetes are admitted to hospital, whether this is directly for their diabetes or not. This information poster, developed by Mayank Patel and the diabetes team at University Hospital Southampton, aims to raise awareness of diabetes tech devices. It also addresses the issue of safe insulin delivery, especially related to pumps.- Posted
-
- Diabetes
- Medicine - Diabetes and Endocrinology
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
Trauma remains a leading cause of global mortality and morbidity, necessitating effective trauma care. Despite progress, adverse events during trauma resuscitation persist, impacting patient outcomes and the healthcare system. This study in the American Journal of Surgery aimed to investigate adverse events in trauma resuscitation, evaluate contributing factors, and assess methods, such as trauma video review (TVR), to mitigate adverse events. The authors concluded that trauma video review (TVR) shows promise for identifying adverse events. They identified challenges including ensuring reporting consistency and integrating approaches into existing protocols. They call for future research to prioritise linking trauma team performance to patient outcomes and develop sustainable TVR programs to enhance patient safety.- Posted
-
- Surgery - Trauma and orthopaedic
- Data
- (and 4 more)
-
Community Post
You might be interested in this new interview with Katinka Blackford Newman, founder of the website AntiDepressantrisks.org. Katinka references the issues of PSSD as a risk that patients are not usually told about.- Posted
- 7 replies
-
1
-
Content Article
This video was produced as a training resource for NHS organisations, to demonstrate the impact the initial response to a patient safety incident and subsequent investigation have on the patient. In this video, Kathryn talks about her experience following an incident where she was harmed when her cannula was not flushed following surgery, leaving her close to death and temporarily paralysed. She describes the clear, compassionate communication displayed by the healthcare professionals involved in her care, both immediately after the incident and throughout the subsequent investigation.- Posted
-
- Patient safety incident
- Communication
- (and 6 more)
-
Content Article
Antidepressant medications are taken by millions of people globally. A small percentage of people who take them will experience rare but dangerous adverse reactions. In this interview, Katinka Blackford Newman tells us about her personal experience of antidepressant-induced psychosis and how this led her to campaign for increased awareness about side effects. She highlights a widespread lack of education and awareness about the risks associated with antidepressants and outlines why she is asking suicide prevention charities to ask callers one simple question about their medication.- Posted
- 1 comment
-
2
-
- Medication
- Prescribing
- (and 5 more)
-
Content Article
The Patient Safety Management Network (PSMN) started on a Friday afternoon in June 2021 as three people in a Zoom meeting. In this interview, PSMN founder Claire Cox reflects on why the network has grown to have over 1600 members and what it has achieved over the past three years. She outlines how the network has fostered a safe space for staff to raise issues and shares feedback from members about what they love about the PSMN. The Patient Safety Management Network (PSMN) is three years old this month! What’s changed during the last three years? I originally set up the PSMN because I was trying to reach out to peers doing similar roles in different organisations. The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) had just been released and we were thinking about how to apply it in our trust. I had questions I wanted to discuss, but there wasn't anyone that I could do that with. Although there was a patient safety specialists forum, I couldn’t access it because my role wasn’t senior enough at the time. So I started up my own! One of the pillars of PSIRF is meaningful collaboration between trusts and people, which is hard to achieve without something like the PSMN. Through the network, we’ve created a pool of people who are up for that collaboration. We now have members from 641 organisations and it’s important to note that they aren’t just from the NHS. Many of the members from outside of the NHS say they have real trouble trying to collaborate as they don’t know who to look for in an organisation. The independent sector finds accessing the same materials and information as the NHS challenging. When we first started the meetings, people would join them and sit quietly. Members were quite passive and expected to be presented to or taught something, which is why we ended up with quite a few outside speakers coming in, such as PSIRF early adopters. As the years progressed, I wanted the network to recognise that we are experts in our own right—as a peer group we can learn from each other and share our experiences. We focused on developing a trust that would allow people to feel safe to share their views. It's taken a long time, but we’ve moved away from people feeling like they need permission to share things that happen in their trusts. We’re not quite there yet though and I would still like to see people feeling even more comfortable to share their questions and insights. Interview continues below infographic How have you fostered that sense of trust within the network? We have always focused on creating a genuine safe space and consistent messaging has helped us emphasise that priority. At the beginning of each session, we go over our ‘ground rules’: We don't record the sessions Instead of taking minutes we write anonymised notes for members who can’t attend. We emphasise that hierarchy doesn’t apply within the network We ask people not to use acronyms. We encourage people to speak up if they want to and don’t put anyone on the spot. Members put their hands up if they want to speak and can use the chat function if they prefer. I say at the start of every meeting that if people don't like the session, they don't have to stay. That’s why the participants we have in each session are always different. People feel able to just take what’s going to help them do their job more effectively. Following our weekly discussions, unattributable notes and resources from the session, such as power point presentations and good practice information, are shared on the PSMN private community space on the hub, accessible to all Network members. Is there a particular session that has been a personal highlight? There have been a lot of highlights for me! When we have speakers, they always share amazing things. My favourite session with an outside speaker was when Dr Pip Hardy from Patient Voices came to speak about digital storytelling. Her message hit hard and people were very moved by what she shared. She ended up coming back to speak again because the first session generated so much helpful discussion. For me, the sessions that best embody what we want this network to be are the ones where we don’t have an external speaker—although they are also the sessions that cause me the most anxiety! I love it when members speak up and new people feel able to contribute, that’s where the magic happens. We witness cross pollination happening in real time, and that’s what I always envisioned the PSMN doing. Have there been things you have picked up from PSMN sessions that have changed the way you approach your role? Definitely—it’s often when you start doing things in your real-life role that you realise where the gaps are. One example that comes to mind is when we spoke about patient and family engagement a few months ago. At my trust, we were seeing a big gap in patient and family support once an investigation ends. Our contact suddenly stops at this point, and we weren’t sure where to signpost people. Patients and families were coming back and saying, “I have been harmed by this, what are you going to do about it? Where am I going to get my psychological support from now? How do I access counselling?” I realised I didn’t know the answers and neither did anyone in my department. I raised this during one of the PSMN meetings and a member piped up and directed me to someone who works for the South London ICB. This contact has a whole list of information that you can give patients, signposting them to further support. I got in touch with her after the session and she's given us a lot of advice about where to direct patients and families when our support comes to an end. Has the PSMN been able to have an impact on patient safety policy and practice? Before we set up the network, people in patient safety roles in individual organisations did not have a voice or any influence on what the safety agenda should look like. We now have a collective voice and are regularly asked for input into research and other initiatives from NHS England and the Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB). We now have over 1,600 members and regularly get around 100 people turning up to our Friday Teams sessions. In the early days there were three or four of us each week! As a group, the roles of patient safety people and the work we do, such as investigations, are understudied. Because of this, there are academic groups who want to come in and look at how we are applying the emerging safety sciences. We take part in some of these studies, but I screen out quite a few because we need to maintain a respect for our members and the patients that they serve. We tend to work with organisations with whom we have built a positive working relationship—for example, staff from Loughborough University and THIS Institute come in to look at what we're doing and ask for our input. HSSIB has also asked what we think about their training, which gives us an opportunity to help shape it. Senior staff from NHS England patient safety and national bodies regularly come to the sessions to share information, hear reflections and gain feedback from Network members. Our feedback is invaluable because we’re the ones using the current guidance, doing the training and implementing PSIRF. Some trusts are much further ahead and have applied PSIRF, while some are at the beginning of their journey and may be struggling with certain challenges. Our collective voice also gives a useful platform to ask the NHS England team what’s next for PSIRF. We’re raising important questions about how they are monitoring standards now they have set them and how trusts are going to be judged against them. PSMN members have also set up ‘spin-off’ networks which are developing as unique forums. For example, the Patient Safety Partners Network has offered important feedback about how the Patient Safety Partner role is evolving and whether it's working for trusts and individuals. It gives NHS England sight of something that they otherwise wouldn't see. The Patient Safety Education Network has also been a great success, set up specifically for those in patient safety education and training roles. In just under a year, it has already expanded to now have more than 400 members. What plans does the PSMN have over the next year? The network has grown exponentially over the past three years and now has a life of its own! It’s important to say that I’m not the ‘voice’ of the PSMN—all of its members are, as the experts within. Some exciting news is that some of the members of the network have written a book which will be published in August 2024. It is authored by network members who have written both the theory and the case studies. It has demonstrated that a real strength of the network is having both researchers and implementers—it's a symbiotic relationship that allows us to ensure our practice is grounded in research, and vice-versa. We are also holding our first network symposium in September which will include academic and in-house learning. At some point, I would like us to look how we can contribute to professionalising the role of patient safety specialists. We currently all have different job titles, pay scales and role descriptions and there is no parity between organisations. While I know that we've come from different backgrounds, we do need some kind of standardised training. At the moment there isn’t any, and that might be one area we could look to influence. That said, the network has a life of its own, so I don’t want to tie us down to specific aims or goals. The PSMN will go where it needs to go. It’s not my network, it’s ours, and I’m sure it will continue to change and morph into what it needs to be. What do members say to you about the network? As I’ve said, it’s important to hear direct from the network, so here are some recent comments members have shared with me: “When I started out in my role, the PSMN really helped me gain confidence, knowledge and a superb national network of safety leads and innovators. Two years down the line I’m still going, and it remains the highlight of my week. It’s not just the ideas, speakers and discussions that are useful, it’s also the way it exemplifies the best in terms of creating a psychologically safe space for sharing safety learning and improvement.” Patient Safety Director at an NHS trust "The network has been an excellent platform to learn from peers across the country. I have not come across any other platform such as this. I use it as my go-to for practical problem-solving ideas and there are always plenty of them, for all sectors. As someone who works in an ICB I am always looking for learning outside of my local system as well as getting ideas and solutions to the everyday business of patient safety and this platform gives us that and more. If you have not yest signed up, I encourage you to do so, it is a fulfilling hour each week.’’ Patient Safety Specialist at an Integrated Care Board “In the couple of years that I have been a member of the network, the PSMN has put me in contact with people of a similar mind from all over the healthcare industry. I have found a group where I can ask questions, suggest ideas and participate in discussions with no fear. The work spent creating the psychological safety is immense and this is one forum where there is no fear of judgement. I have learnt so much from each and every member of the network. I continue to be amazed at just how talented the patient safety people in healthcare are. The proof of the pudding is that this is a meeting on a Friday afternoon that invariably draws 70-100 people, and they look forward to attending—an immense success statistic in healthcare!” Patient Safety Education Lead at an NHS trust “The PSMN is an excellent forum for professional and lay people to come together and feel comfortable to be open and transparent about the concerns they have regarding the implementation of PSIRF, learning from incidents, learning from patient stories and above all wanting to ensure that patients, families and carers are at the centre of everything they do.” Patient Safety Partner at an NHS acute trust "The network has genuinely been an invaluable resource in my patient safety work. Not everyone in the NHS, I believe, truly 'gets' how we need to go about making patients safer, so spending time with a group of people who do feels like a breath of fresh air. The ideas, innovation and general support of this group has helped me in my career, and taking away ideas and trying them with my own teams, then feeding back wins and challenges has been so rewarding. It's honestly a joy to attend these sessions." Patient Safety Manager at an NHS acute trust Personally, I’d like to say a thank to you all those who support the PSMN, including AQUA, who assist taking notes at Network meetings, and BD who provided some tech setup funding for the private forum on the hub. I’d especially like to thank Patient Safety Learning, for hosting the Network on the hub and providing us with invaluable support to grow and develop the PSMN over the past three years. How to join the Patient Safety Management Network Do you work in patient safety? If you are interested in joining the Patient Safety Management Network, you can join by signing up to the hub today. If you are already a member of the hub, please email [email protected]. You can also find out more about the growing number of informal peer support networks hosted and supported by Patient Safety Learning. These networks now include: Patient Safety Education Network – a peer network for those in patient safety education and training roles. Patient Safety Partners Network – a group for Patient Safety Partners, paid and voluntary roles within NHS organisations aimed at improving patient safety. National NatSSIPs Network – a group of healthcare professionals aiming to reduce the number of patient safety incidents related to invasive procedures. Patient Safety Paediatric Leaders Network – an invited network for anyone who is a strategic-level decision maker in a specialist children’s hospital or unit with a leadership responsibility for patient safety and/or quality in the UK. The networks provide a forum for people involved in patient safety to meet up, share ideas and initiatives and learn from others. Related reading Putting the writing on the wall: Explaining work as imagined vs work as done (by Claire Cox) Patient Safety Spotlight Interview with Jordan Nicholls, Serious Incident, Quality Improvement and Governance Lead Patient Safety Education Network The voice of the patient safety frontline—An introduction to the Patient Safety Partners Network- Posted
- 3 comments
-
5
-
- Collaboration
- PSIRF
- (and 6 more)
-
Content Article
This article looks at recent efforts to increase awareness of female genital mutilation (FGM) amongst healthcare professionals in the UK. Dr Victoria Kinkaid conducted a UK-wide survey to find out how much medical students knew about FGM. Results from the survey highlighted a gap in medical student education around FGM. Further exploration with the help of focus groups revealed that this knowledge gap also affected other frontline professionals with mandatory reporting duties for FGM, including teachers, midwives and social workers. Working with her MSc supervisor, Dr Heather May Morgan, Victoria launched a four week course entitled 'Female Genital Mutilation (FGM): Health, Law, and Socio-Cultural Sensitivity' in 2022 to try and bridge this gap. This article looks at the impact of the course and how Victoria and Heather's work to increase awareness is expanding.- Posted
-
- Womens health
- Surgery - Obs & Gynae
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
Polypharmacy is a term used to describe when a patient is taking a number of medicines at the same time. This study in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology aimed to measure how common polypharmacy is and describe the prescribing of selected medications known for overuse in older people with polypharmacy in primary care. It was a multinational retrospective cohort study that used data from patients with a mean age of 75-76 years from six countries: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. The results revealed a high prevalence of polypharmacy with more than half of the older population being prescribed at least five drugs in four of the six countries. Whilst polypharmacy may be appropriate in many patients, the authors found worryingly high usage of PPIs and benzodiazepines. The study's results support current efforts to improve polypharmacy management across Europe. Related reading Interview with Dr Elena Mucci, Consultant Geriatrician at East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust- Posted
-
- Prescribing
- Older People (over 65)
- (and 4 more)
-
Content Article
Medicines reconciliation is the process of compiling a complete list of a person’s current medicines. When a patient registers at a new primary care setting, medicines reconciliation contributes to patient safety and continuity of care. This article in The Pharmaceutical Journal explores how to optimise the multidisciplinary team and involve pharmacy technicians in the process, using four case scenarios. The article aims to help those working in community pharmacy teams to: identify potential risks and appropriate management strategies for new patients with complex medication needs, including those with chronic conditions and those requiring specialist care. understand the importance of timely referrals, communication with specialists, and adherence to guidelines in ensuring safe and effective medication management. recognise the significance of interdisciplinary collaboration and patient-centred approaches in addressing the diverse healthcare needs of patients, particularly those from other cultural backgrounds. You can access this article by signing up for a free account with The Pharmaceutical Journal.- Posted
-
- Pharmacy / chemist
- Teamwork
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
A fire at the University Hospital of Leicester in 2023 led to the recommendation of a full evacuation of the tertiary neonatal unit. The incident was ultimately stood down—however, it highlighted the lack of inter-agency understanding regarding the difficulty and complexity of moving critically unwell and premature babies in the event of a major incident. In response, the Leicester Royal Infirmary and other agencies staged a simulation exercise to enable teams to prepare for possible future incidents. This HSJ article describes the simulation exercise and the lessons it revealed about managing neonatal unit evacuations during major incidents. It highlights key learnings around the two themes of communication and estates.- Posted
-
- Patient safety incident
- Risk management
- (and 5 more)
-
Content Article
Online reporting tools are a key component of professional accountability programmes as they allow hospital staff to report co-worker unprofessional behaviour. Ethos is a whole-of-hospital professional accountability programme that includes an online messaging system, which has now been implemented across multiple Australian hospitals. This study examined reported unprofessional behaviour that staff indicated created a risk to patient safety. It included 1310 Ethos submissions reporting co-worker unprofessional behaviour between 2017 and 2020 across eight Australian hospitals. The findings indicate that unprofessional behaviour was associated with risks to patient safety. Co-worker reports about unprofessional behaviour have significant value as they can be used by organisations to better understand how unprofessional behaviour can disrupt work practices and lead to risks to patient safety.- Posted
-
- Safety culture
- Civility
- (and 5 more)
-
Content Article
Children are at higher risk of medication errors due to the complexity of drug prescribing and administration. Intravenous (IV) paracetamol overdose differs from overdose by ingestion as there is no enteral absorptive buffering. This study outlines the first national UK data focusing on paediatric IV paracetamol poisoning. The data show that unintentional IV paracetamol overdose appears to occur more frequently in young children. A significant proportion of errors were calculation errors, which were often 10-fold errors. While these errors have the potential to cause serious harm, thankfully most cases were asymptomatic. Errors with IV paracetamol might be reduced by electronic prescribing support systems, better communication regarding administration and consideration of whether other routes are more appropriate.- Posted
-
- Children and Young People
- Medication
- (and 2 more)
-
Content Article
The healthcare systems of nearly every country are straining to keep up with the demands placed on them by advances in both treatment and technology. In this article, Timothy Ferris explores ways in which technology can reduce the burden on already under-resourced healthcare workforces. Acknowledging the complexity of healthcare compared to other industries, and the highly professional nature of the workforce, he uses the concept of 'unit cost' to look at how the financial and time burden associated with healthcare interactions can be reduced.- Posted
-
- Technology
- Innovation
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
Diagnostic error is largely discovered and evaluated through self-reporting and manual review, which is costly and not suitable for real-time intervention. AI presents new opportunities to use electronic health record data for automated detection of potential misdiagnosis, executed at scale and generalised across diseases. The authors of this study propose a new, automated approach to identifying diagnostic divergence considering both diagnosis and risk of mortality. The aim of this study was to identify cases of misdiagnosis of infectious disease in the emergency department by measuring the difference between predicted diagnosis and documented diagnosis, weighted by mortality. Two machine learning models were trained for prediction of infectious disease and mortality using the first 24 hours of data. Charts were manually reviewed by clinicians to determine whether there could have been a more correct or timely diagnosis. This year’s World Patient Safety Day on 17 September 2024 (WPSD 2024) is focused on the theme “Improving diagnosis for patient safety”. Find out more. -
Content Article
Suicide is a leading cause of maternal death during the perinatal period, which includes pregnancy and the year after birth. While maternal suicide is a relatively rare event with a prevalence of 3.84 per 100,000 live births in the UK, the impact of maternal suicide is profound and long-lasting. Many more women will attempt suicide during the perinatal period, with a worldwide estimated prevalence of 680 per 100,000 in pregnancy and 210 per 100,000 in the year after birth. This qualitative study aimed to explore the experiences of women and birthing people who had a perinatal suicide attempt and to understand the context and contributing factors surrounding their perinatal suicide attempt. The researchers spoke to women with lived experience of perinatal mental illness. Their results highlighted three key themes: Trauma and Adversities which captures the traumatic events and life adversities with which participants started their pregnancy journeys. Disillusionment with Motherhood which brings together a range of sub-themes highlighting various challenges related to pregnancy, birth and motherhood resulting in a decline in women’s mental health. Entrapment and Despair which presents a range of factors that lead to a significant deterioration of women’s mental health, marked by feelings of failure, hopelessness and losing control. The authors called for further research into these factors which could lead to earlier detection of suicide risk, improving care and potentially prevent future maternal suicides.- Posted
-
- Self harm/ suicide
- Maternity
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
Alzheimer’s Society estimates that there are currently around 900,000 people living with dementia in the UK. Unlike other major conditions, there is no national clinical pathway for dementia, and despite there being a national target, there is wide variation in dementia diagnosis rates across England. Alzheimer’s Society commissioned The King’s Fund to explore the development of Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) through the lens of dementia diagnosis—to consider what opportunities ICSs present to approach dementia differently and to improve diagnosis rates by doing so. The research team explored enablers and barriers to improving dementia diagnosis through interviews with stakeholders and people affected by dementia in three case study ICSs. Key messages High-quality dementia diagnosis and care involves many different parts of the health and social care system working together effectively. Integrated care systems (ICSs) were created to achieve this kind of whole-system approach. Early and accurate diagnosis means people living with dementia can access support that can help to improve their quality of life, and potentially treatments that can help with managing symptoms. Diagnosis also enables people and their families to plan ahead. Improvements in dementia diagnosis in the three case study sites involved in our research are the result of several years’ work and are not attributable to the introduction of statutory ICSs in 2022. However, their broad emphasis on working together as a system over the past decade has helped to create positive conditions for improvement. Key enablers of improvement in the sites we examined included efforts to strengthen relationships between primary care, memory clinics and other services; public awareness-raising activities; and the introduction of new extended roles for GPs (for example, to improve diagnosis in care homes). In the longer term, ICSs need to build the capabilities and processes required to support testing new approaches, learning, and scaling and spreading successful innovations. This will need support from the government, NHS England and other national bodies. ICSs can contribute to improved dementia diagnosis by: ensuring all partner organisations have shared priorities and an agreed plan for delivering improvement providing visible cross-system leadership and effective governance arrangements for overseeing the delivery of the plan connecting people working in different parts of the system, building mutual understanding and reinforcing a culture of collaboration sharing learning and spreading good practice supporting action at scale across larger geographies addressing inequalities by ensuring sufficient attention is paid to improving diagnosis rates in underserved communities. Further reading on the hub: This year’s World Patient Safety Day on 17 September 2024 (WPSD 2024) is focused on the theme “Improving diagnosis for patient safety”. Find out more.- Posted
-
- Dementia
- Integrated Care System (ICS)
- (and 4 more)
-
Content Article
Nurses, midwives and paramedics make up over half of the healthcare workforce in the UK National Health Service and have some of the highest prevalence of mental ill health. This study in BMJ Quality & Safety explored why mental ill health is a growing problem and how we might change this. The authors identified the following key themes:It is difficult to promote staff psychological wellness where there is a blame cultureThe needs of the system often over-ride staff psychological well-being at workThere are unintended personal costs of upholding and implementing values at workInterventions are fragmented, individual-focused and insufficiently recognise cumulative chronic stressorsIt is challenging to design, identify and implement interventions.They suggest that healthcare organisations need to rebalance the working environment to enable healthcare professionals to recover and thrive. This requires:high standards for patient care to be balanced with high standards for staff mental well-being.professional accountability to be balanced with having a listening, learning culture.reactive responsive interventions to be balanced by having proactive preventative interventionsthe individual focus balanced by an organisational focus.- Posted
-
- Nurse
- Staff safety
- (and 6 more)
-
Event
untilAlthough healthcare worker violence ranks high among today's top patient safety concerns, healthcare workers continue to be harmed, and healthcare has been identified as the profession with the highest percentage of nonfatal workplace violence injuries. Over the last few years, a Pennsylvania facility found that assaults on nursing in their acute care organisation were more than double the national rate. In the webinar, Loni Francis, MSN, RN, director of Behavioral Health Services, and Erin Marinchak, MSN, RN, senior director of clinical practice, Reading Hospital, Tower Health, will explain how proactive rounding by internal experts an prevent assaults and how behaviour management plans can reduce physical assaults. Register for the webinar This event takes place at 12:00 EDT and 17:00 BST -
Content Article
In this opinion piece for The Guardian, Adrian Chiles describes how his father was unnecessarily transferred from a community hospital to an A&E department by a locum GP. This caused his father—who was largely alone, confused and without his hearing aids—great distress, and should have been avoided, as healthcare professionals said the transfer had been unnecessary. Adrian describes his father's rapid deterioration following the incident and his regret that some of his father's last days were spent—avoidably—in distress. He says, "The process, the system, the protocols, the whatever, take hold and the wrong thing happens even though everyone can see it’s wrong but is powerless to put a stop to it."- Posted
-
- Emergency medicine
- Accident and Emergency
- (and 5 more)
-
Content Article
Beta-lactamases are enzymes produced by some bacteria that may make them resistant to some antibiotics. Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) production is associated with a bacteria usually found in the bowel. ESBL bacteria can be present in the bowel of individuals without their knowledge and may survive there harmlessly until the person becomes ill or requires antibiotic therapy. This information leaflet from the Northern Ireland Public Health Agency explains who is at risk of being infected with an ESBL-producing bacteria, how to reduce transmission and how EBSL infection is treated.- Posted
-
- Infection control
- Healthcare associated infection
- (and 2 more)
-
Content Article
Although diagnostic errors are estimated to affect about 12 million Americans each year in ambulatory care settings alone, the conceptual and pragmatic scientific foundations for their measurement are under-developed. Further progress towards reducing diagnostic errors will rely on our ability to overcome measurement-related challenges. This article in BMJ Quality & Safety outlines a multifaceted framework to advance the science of measuring diagnostic errors (The Safer Dx framework). The authors describe how Safer DX serves as a conceptual foundation for system-wide safety measurement, monitoring and improvement of diagnostic error. They believe it lays robust groundwork for measurement and monitoring techniques to ensure diagnostic safety. This year’s World Patient Safety Day on 17 September 2024 (WPSD 2024) is focused on the theme “Improving diagnosis for patient safety”. Find out more.- Posted
-
- Diagnosis
- Diagnostic error
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with: