Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Survey'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Digital health and care service provision
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Apps for health and care
    • Teleservices
    • Other health and care software
    • Digital health regulatory bodies/standards/guidance
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Patient Safety Alerts
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Transformative Simulation
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • Patient Safety Standards
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


First name


Last name


Country


About me


Organisation


Role

Found 286 results
  1. Content Article
    Every year the Patients Association hears from patients about their experience of the NHS. Behind every statistic in this report is a person, with a delayed diagnosis, a cancelled procedure or a medical appointment where nobody asked the patient what mattered.  This survey was conducted in early 2026 with 807 patient respondents, providing evidence drawn from their experiences. It does so at a significant moment. The government’s 10 Year Health Plan for England, and more recently the NHS Modernisation Bill, commits to putting patient choice, voice, and feedback at the heart of how quality is defined and measured.   Key findings Three quarters (75%) said delays worsened their physical health. 74% said delays negatively affected their quality of life. 69% of patients were never asked what matters to them during their NHS care. Just 17% said their priorities were listened to and acted upon. More than half of respondents (57%) struggled to access both GP and hospital appointments. Only 41% felt like an equal partner in decisions about their care. Half of patients felt their care was poorly co-ordinated.
  2. News Article
    Almost two-thirds of nurses believe there are too few of them working in the NHS to keep patients safe and give them proper care, a survey has revealed. Understaffing and the increasingly complex medical needs posed by an ageing population are creating a “deadly mix” for patients, the Royal College of Nursing warned on Monday. More than one in five (22%) of nurses working in hospitals or community settings across the UK told the RCN that the number of nurses on duty in their last shift was “well below what was needed”, which left care “significantly compromised” and a “high level of risk of harm to patents and staff”. Of the more than 13,000 nurses who took part in the survey 64% said they thought that the number of registered nurses on that shift was “below” or “well below” what was needed to ensure safe care. One nurse working in an A&E in England told the union: “The shift was completely unsafe and it felt like a miracle that avoidable harm was not caused.” Prof Nicola Ranger, the RCN’s chief executive and general secretary, will urge ministers to bring in mandatory minimum safe nurse staffing levels when she opens its annual congress on Monday. “Widespread vacancies of registered nurses are always unsafe,” she said. “But the risk is being compounded by the demands of delivering ever more complex care to an ageing, sicker population, with multiple conditions. It’s a deadly mix.” Speaking in Liverpool, she will accuse ministers of failing to ensure that the health service has enough nurses and the nursing profession is being “set up to fail”. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 18 May 2026
  3. News Article
    Mental health patients in the UK are routinely coming to harm because of high caseloads, understaffing and overwhelming administrative work, according to a poll that found only a fifth of specialist nurses felt their workload was manageable. Prof Nicola Ranger, the general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing (RCN), said mental health nurses were caught in a “perfect storm” and unable to keep up with rising demand, with patients paying the price by missing out on crucial care. Half of the specialist nurses who responded to the RCN union’s UK-wide survey said mental health patients “frequently come to harm” because caseloads are too high, with a quarter feeling that time pressures lead to daily issues with patient deterioration, relapse or self-harm. Nearly two-thirds said their caseloads had risen “a lot” in the past three years, while excessive admin and a “tick box” culture were blamed for taking away valuable time for patient care. The poll also suggests that demand for services has grown more than twice as fast as the number of nurses in the field. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 27 April 2026
  4. News Article
    Nearly half of Americans are somewhat skeptical of vaccines, a new poll has found. Some 46% of U.S. adults who responded to a Public First poll by Politico in March agreed that “facts on vaccines are still up for debate and it is damaging to enforce their uptake.” In contrast, only 39% said that the science on vaccines “is clear and it is damaging to question it.” The results of the survey are in line with the views of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime vaccine skeptic and founder of the Republican “Make America Healthy Again” movement. “What stands out is that vaccine safety and vaccine choice are no longer fringe issues,” Mary Holland, CEO of anti-vax group Children’s Health Defense, which Kennedy previously led before taking his post in government, told Politico. “People want to be able to make their own medical decisions.” Astonishingly, overall, 39% of respondents to Politico’s survey said they would allow vaccine-preventable diseases to return, rather than force people to have vaccines, in contrast to 47% who said they would rather not. During his tenure as Health Secretary, Kennedy has overseen several major changes within his department and its policies, including the attempted overhaul of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the elimination of Covid-19 vaccine recommendations. Last week, it was reported that the CDC had delayed publishing a report showing the benefits of the Covid vaccine, further sparking concerns that the information conflicted with Kennedy’s views. The CDC insisted that the move followed standard procedure. Read full story Source: The Independent, 14 April 2026
  5. Content Article
    Psychological safety is essential for open communication in the workplace, learning and high performance. Despite this, many business owners and HR professionals don’t know how safe their team truly feels to speak up, share ideas or admit mistakes.  A psychologically safe workplace survey helps you measure this, uncover barriers and find opportunities to build trust and collaboration. Employment Hero have designed a psychological safety survey template to make it easy for you to measure psychological safety within your teams and take action to build a more open, supportive and high-performing workplace. Here’s what you’ll find: An overview of psychological safety. Survey instructions. Ready-to-use survey questions. Open-ended reflection questions. Action planning guide. Tips for building psychological safety.
  6. News Article
    Public satisfaction with the NHS has risen for the first time since 2019, but people remain deeply frustrated with stubbornly long waits to receive GP, A&E or hospital care according to the latest annual British Society Attitudes survey. The proportion of voters in Britain satisfied with the way the NHS runs has increased from the record low of 21% seen last year to 26%. At the same time dissatisfaction with the health service fell 8% – the biggest drop since 1998 – although it remains high at 51%. However, delays in accessing care continue to cause public unhappiness. Most people are dissatisfied with the time it takes to get seen in A&E (66%), receive hospital care (63%) and get a GP appointment (58%). Only 14% are satisfied with A&E waiting times. Mark Dayan, head of public affairs at the Nuffield Trust, said: “These are still numbers that you would have thought were catastrophic in the 2010s. They’re still worse than they were even during the 90s, a period when the public was widely perceived to be very unhappy about the NHS.” Wes Streeting hailed the findings as proof that the NHS, which he said was “broken” when Labour won power in July 2024, was now “on the road to recovery”. The health secretary will cite them as evidence of progress in a speech on Wednesday in which he will set out plans to improve care at five badly performing health trusts. Mark Dayan, head of public affairs at the Nuffield Trust, said: “These are still numbers that you would have thought were catastrophic in the 2010s. They’re still worse than they were even during the 90s, a period when the public was widely perceived to be very unhappy about the NHS.” The rise in satisfaction “is a glimmer on the horizon, but the public mood remains dark”, he added. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 25 March 2026
  7. Content Article
    The NHS has seen a 6 percentage point increase in public satisfaction, the first rise since 2019, according to the latest findings from the gold-standard survey of public attitudes to the NHS and social care, analysed by the Nuffield Trust and The King’s Fund and surveyed by NatCen. Key findings Satisfaction with the NHS In 2025, 26% of British adults were ‘very’ or ‘quite’ satisfied with the way in which the NHS runs – a statistically significant 6 percentage point increase from 2024. Around half of respondents (51%) were dissatisfied with the NHS in 2025, a statistically significant fall of 8 percentage points compared to 2024 when it was 59%. This is the first increase in satisfaction since 2019, and the largest fall in dissatisfaction in more than 25 years. People under 35 (20%), supporters of Reform (20%) and people in Wales (18%) were significantly less satisfied with the NHS than the survey average. Despite the increase in satisfaction only 16% of respondents thought the standard of NHS care would improve in the next 5 years compared to 53% who said they expected care to get worse. Satisfaction with different NHS services Satisfaction with GP services was 35% and dissatisfaction was 45%. Neither was a statistically significant change on the previous year. Just over 1 in 5 respondents (22%) said they were satisfied with NHS dentistry, with 54% saying they were dissatisfied. These are similar results to the previous year. 22% of respondents said they were satisfied with A&E services. Dissatisfaction was 53%. In 2024, 19% said they were satisfied with A&E services, although the change is not statistically significant. 37% of respondents were satisfied with inpatient and outpatient hospital care, an increase of 5 percentage points since 2024, although not statistically significant. 29% were dissatisfied – no change on last year. Attitudes to NHS standards, access and staffing Half of respondents (50%) were satisfied with the quality of NHS care in 2025, and 28% were dissatisfied. There was no statistically significant change since 2024. Only a minority of respondents were satisfied with waiting times for GP appointments (27%), hospital appointments (16%) and in A&E (14%). There were no statistically significant changes compared to last year. Only 12% agreed that ‘there are enough staff in the NHS these days’. 71% disagreed. There was no significant change compared to 2024. Attitudes to NHS financing and efficiency 9% of respondents said that the government spent too much or far too much money on the NHS, 22% said that it spent about the right amount and 66% said that it spent too little or far too little. There were no statistically significant changes compared to 2024. Only 13% of respondents agreed that the NHS spends the money it has efficiently. 55% disagreed with this statement. There was no change compared to 2024. When asked about government choices on tax and spending on the NHS, the public remain closely divided between raising taxes and spending more on the NHS (45%) and keeping taxation and spending at the same level (43%). Only 8% would choose to cut taxes and spend less on the NHS. There was no statistically significant change since 2024. Supporters of the Green party (70%) and the Labour party (57%) were significantly more likely to support higher taxes and higher NHS spending than supporters of Reform (32%) and the Conservative party (30%). NHS priorities and principles On being asked what the top three most important priorities for the NHS should be, both making it easier to get a GP appointment and improving A&E waiting times were selected as top priorities by 46% of respondents, followed by 45% for waiting times for planned operations and 43% for increasing the number of NHS staff. People aged 18–64 were more likely than those aged 65 and over to prioritise A&E waiting times (48% vs 38%) and increasing NHS staff (46% vs 35%) whereas those aged 65 and over prioritised prevention and staying healthy (48% vs 36%). As in previous years, a large majority of respondents agreed that the founding principles of the NHS should ‘definitely’ or ‘probably’ apply in 2025: that the NHS should be free of charge when you need to use it (89%), the NHS should primarily be funded through taxes (81%) and the NHS should be available to everyone (74%). There has been some decrease across the past five years in the proportion who think these principles should ‘definitely’ or ‘probably’ apply since the questions were first asked in 2021. The greatest decrease over time has been support for the principle that ‘the NHS should be available to everyone’. Support for the principle that the NHS should be available to everyone varied significantly by supporters of different political parties, with 68% of Labour supporters agreeing this principle should ‘definitely’ apply compared to 45% of Conservative supporters and 30% of Reform supporters. Social care In 2025, 14% of respondents said they were satisfied with social care. 49% were dissatisfied with social care – a statistically significant decrease from 2024 when this figure was 53%. The top three priorities for social care were helping people stay independent at home for as long as possible (46%), making social care more affordable to those who need it (45%) and improving the quality of social care services (44%). When asked about government choices on tax and spending on social care, 51% said the government should keep taxes and spending on social care at the same level as now. 38% said the government should increase taxes and spend more on social care. 6% said the government should reduce taxes and spend less on social care. Support for increasing taxes and spending more on social care was lower than for the NHS – it was 45% for the NHS. The difference was statistically significant.
  8. Content Article
    To explore current use of electronic patient record (EPR) systems, The Health Foundation commissioned a survey of 1,725 NHS staff members in England between July and October 2025 to better understand NHS staff views towards them. Staff views provide valuable intelligence about the performance of EPR systems in practice. And as the primary users of these systems, staff support is essential if EPRs are to be implemented and used effectively. Buy-in from staff can help EPR systems become more useful and reliable, improving data quality and increasing opportunities for refinement and innovation.  Key points The survey found that EPRs are in widespread use, with 83% of respondents saying they now use them as part of their job in the NHS. On balance, the NHS staff we surveyed were positive about the impact of EPRs in several areas and felt these systems are already improving both patient care (75%) and patient safety (73%). Yet 37% of staff also felt EPRs are not currently working well in their organisation. The survey points to a mix of frustrations and barriers to the effective use of EPRs, including having to use multiple EPR systems every day, a lack of real-time support and limited opportunities to give feedback on how they are working. An area of particular concern is training. Only around half (49%) of survey respondents had received training on how to use the EPR system for their role, and less than a third (28%) had received training on how to fix or troubleshoot problems. Unlocking the full value of EPRs will require coordinated action across the NHS to improve the integration of systems, training and support for staff. Without this, there is a risk that many of the potential benefits for productivity, safety and quality of care will remain unrealised. Related reading on the hub: HSSIB Investigation Report: Patient safety issues associated with electronic patient record (EPR) systems – a thematic review Patient safety and electronic patient record systems: Patient Safety Learning’s response to HSSIB report Electronic patient record systems: Putting patient safety at the heart of implementation
  9. News Article
    Nearly half of integrated care boards (ICBs) opted out of the 2025 Staff Survey, and those that took part saw a huge drop in morale amid restructuring. The 2025 data covers just 23 ICBs, because the remaining 19 decided not to take part amid major restructures. The share agreeing they “would recommend my organisation as a place to work”, on average across the ICBs, plummeted from 54% to 36.9%. It was already lower than most provider trusts. Drastic cuts to ICB budgets and a narrowing of their role were announced a year ago, followed by months of uncertainty and redundancy schemes running over the winter. Many ICBs have merged their leadership with neighbours. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 13 March 2026 Related reading on the hub: Patient Safety Learning’s response to the NHS Staff Survey Results 2025
  10. Content Article
    In this article, Patient Safety Learning reflects on the results of the NHS Staff Survey 2025, focusing on responses relating to reporting, speaking up and acting on patient safety concerns. On 12 March 2026 the NHS published the results of its 2025 staff survey.[1] 729,423 staff from 238 organisations took part in this survey, which provides a snapshot of their experiences of working in the health service. The survey includes several questions on reporting patient safety incidents and near misses, concerns about clinical safety and views on speaking up more broadly. As we set out in this analysis, unfortunately the Staff Survey results suggest there are little signs of positive progress across many of these areas. Reporting of errors, near misses and incidents A high number of survey respondents, 86.16%, answered that their organisation encourages staff to report errors, near misses and incidents. However, 40.71% of respondents (over 290,000 staff) subsequently answered that they were unable to say with confidence that their organisation treats them fairly if they are involved in an error, near miss or incident. Answers to both these questions in the Staff Survey have remained fairly consistent across the past four years, as illustrated by the table and graph below. These results suggest there persists a significant disconnect between what organisations tell staff about reporting patient safety issues, and how staff feel they will be treated if they actually raise concerns. 67.3% of staff said that when errors, near misses or incidents are reported, their organisation takes action to ensure that they do not happen again. Responses to this question have also remained fairly static for the past four years (within a range of 67-69%), with nearly a third of staff consistently feeling unable to answer this question with a positive response. Responses to this question also vary significantly according to Trust type, with Community Trusts scoring highest on average (75.91%) and Ambulance Trusts scoring lowest (54.79%). Connected to this, nearly two-fifths of respondents, 38.98%, did not agree that they are given feedback about changes made in response to reported errors, near misses and incidents. When staff are unable to clearly see that their organisation acts on their safety concerns, it is understandable that they may be less motivated to report these. Concerns about clinical safety When asked about whether they would feel secure raising concerns about unsafe clinical practice, 71.1% of respondents answered this positively. Although this is quite a high percentage, the response rate in 2025 means that over 200,000 NHS employees, 28.9% of survey respondents, could not say that they would feel secure raising such concerns. When asked if they were confident that their organisation would address these concerns, 55.49% of staff responded positively. As illustrated by the table and graph below, responses to both these questions have remained fairly consistent across the last five years. Speaking up about concerns Turning to speaking up about concerns more broadly, 39.71% of survey respondents (over 280,000 staff) could not say that they felt safe to speak up about anything that concerns them in their organisation. As with the questions on reporting incidents, errors and near misses, again the average response varies significantly according to Trust type. When looking at Community Trusts, this figure drops to 30.2% but is significantly higher in Acute and Acute & Community Trusts (41.03%) and Ambulance Trusts (45.53%). When asked about their confidence in their organisation addressing their concern, just over half of all respondents did not express confidence that this would happen. As illustrated by the table and graph below, responses to both these questions have remained more or less consistent over the past five years, with a small decline this year. Safety culture in the NHS The 2025 staff survey results show no significant change in responses to questions on reporting, speaking up and acting on patient safety concerns in recent years. While the survey only provides an annual snapshot of experiences of working in the NHS, its findings suggest that a fear of speaking up and a lack of confidence that concerns will be acted on still persists in too many NHS organisations. These issues form a recurring theme across inquiries into major patient safety scandals.[2] [3] [4] They also can be seen reflected in the shocking experiences and testimonies of whistleblowers, such as those highlighted in our Speaking up for patient safety interview series.[5] Staff being able to raise concerns safely and effectively is essential for patient safety. However, as highlighted in a recent review shared by Roger Kline on the hub, the NHS continues to struggle with creating a culture where this happens reliably.[6] [7] Need for action It was notable that the need to tackle problems relating to safety culture was absent in the 10 Year Health Plan for the NHS, as highlighted in our response to this last year.[8] If the healthcare system is to truly be transformed over the next decade, then we cannot simply proceed by ignoring these issues or assuming they will resolve themselves. At Patient Safety Learning, we believe it is vital that we create a culture in healthcare that supports raising, discussing and addressing the risks of unsafe care. Year on year we highlight the stagnant set of staff survey results in this area because we do not believe the lack of improvement in this area is acceptable. Too often, at a national level, it appears that the extent and persistence of blame cultures in healthcare, and the need to tackle this, are acknowledged but action is not taken to address these significant challenges. It is difficult to imagine that the scale evidence of an unsafe culture in other safety critical industries would be tolerated—where the consequences of not addressing the risk in incidents may also be serious injury or loss of life. We hope that the soon to be published new NHS Quality Strategy will reflect on the importance of this issue and that health system leadership will recognise this issue as an urgent priority.[9] References NHS Staff Survey. NHS Staff Survey National Results. 12 March 2026. The Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry, 6 February 2013. Independent review of maternity services at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust. Ockenden Report: Findings, conclusions and essential actions from the independent review of maternity services at The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, 30 March 2022. Independent Investigation into East Kent Maternity Services. Maternity and neonatal services in East Kent – the Report of the Independent Investigation, 19 October 2022. Helen Hughes and Peter Duffy. Key themes emerging from our ‘Speaking up for patient safety’ interview series. Patient Safety Learning, 14 May 2025. Roger Kline. Power and the sound of silence. Patient Safety Learning, 11 March 2026. Roger Kline. Patient safety and speaking up – learning from the literature. Patient Safety Learning, 11 March 2026. Patient Safety Learning. 10 Year Health Plan: Patient Safety Learning’s response. 14 August 2025. Patient Safety Learning and Aqua. Patient safety and the new NHS Quality Strategy. 25 February 2026.
  11. News Article
    Hundreds of thousands of NHS staff have been attacked, harassed, bullied, or subject to racism, latest NHS figures show. The health service’s 2025 staff survey found that one in seven had experienced violence from patients or the public, while more than a quarter reported harassment, bullying and abuse, the highest levels in three years. Given that the NHS in England employs 1.5 million people, this would equate to about 217,000 experiencing violence and more than 380,000 reporting harassment and bullying in 2025 alone. Sexual harassment has also reached record levels, the figures show. Nearly 1 in 10 NHS workers, a third of ambulance staff and more than one in 10 nurses and midwives said they had experienced unwanted sexual behaviour in the past year. But underreporting is still a problem, the survey found. While three-quarters said they would report violent incidents, barely half said they would report harassment or abuse. The staff survey also unveils the extent of racism and discrimination. One in five Black and minority ethnic staff reported abuse, bullying or harassment from patients or the public, compared with just 1 in 20 white staff. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 13 March 2026 Further reading on the hub: Patient Safety Learning’s response to the NHS Staff Survey Results 2025
  12. News Article
    A hospital group CEO says its leaders have “managed to let people down” and, in some cases, “disconnected” from their staff, in response to very poor NHS Staff Survey scores. The Norfolk and Waveney University Hospitals Group CEO’s comments in an all-staff briefing email acknowledge the significant morale problems across the three trusts, which are undergoing a major restructure. Lesley Dwyer was appointed group CEO and took the group live last year. It comprises Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals, James Paget University Hospitals, and Queen Elizabeth Hospital King’s Lynn Foundation Trusts. The results showed a year-on-year decline in staff satisfaction across all three trusts. Professor Dwyer told HSJ this was “from a starting point that was already too low”. “This is not the experience we want for our people, and it is not the standard they deserve,” she said. In a note to staff seen by HSJ, Professor Dwyer cited “re-structures and transformations… changes in leadership combined with waiting list, service, and financial pressures, pressures on beds, strikes etc”, adding: “It’s no wonder so many of you tell us you are weary.” She added: “But for me, these results speak even more deeply than that – I feel that somehow, despite the best of intentions, I/we have managed to let people down. These results show we have disconnected our people from the very purpose of the NHS organisations they work for and, in some cases, from the people who lead them.” Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 13 March 2026 Further reading on the hub: Patient Safety Learning’s response to the NHS Staff Survey Results 2025
  13. Content Article
    The NHS Staff Survey is one of the largest workforce surveys in the world and is carried out every year to improve staff experiences across the NHS. It asks staff in England about their experiences of working for their respective NHS organisations. Over 1.5 million NHS employees in England were invited to participate in the survey, with 729,423 staff responding in 2025. Responses to key patient safety questions in this year’s survey included: Reporting of errors, near misses and incidents 33.71% of staff have seen errors, near misses, or incidents that could have hurt staff and/or patients/service users in the last month (2024: 33.64%; 2023: 33.50%; 2022: 33.72%). 59.29% of staff said their organisation treats staff who are involved in an error, near miss or incident fairly (2024: 59.72%; 2023: 59.51%; 2022: 58.22%). 86.16% of staff said their organisation encourages staff to report errors, near misses or incidents (2024: 86.43%; 2023: 86.41%; 2022: 86.14%) 67.30% of staff said that when errors, near misses or incidents are reported, their organisation takes action to ensure that they do not happen again (2024: 68.19%; 2023: 68.20%; 2022: 67.40%) 61.02% of staff said that they are given feedback about changes made in response to reported errors, near misses and incidents (2024: 61.28%; 2023: 61.03%; 2022: 59.89%). Concerns about clinical safety 71.10% of staff said they would feel secure raising concerns about unsafe clinical practice (2024: 71.56%; 2023: 71.47%; 2022: 72.07%; 2021: 75.17%). 55.49% of staff said they were confident that their organisation would address their concern (2024: 56.82%; 2023: 56.86%; 2022: 56.75%; 2021: 59.52%). Speaking up about concerns 60.29% of staff said they feel safe to speak up about anything that concerns them in their organisation (2024: 61.83%; 2023: 62.35%; 2022: 61.54%; 2021: 62.08%). 47.59% of staff said they were confident that their organisation would address their concern (2024: 49.51%; 2023: 50.06%; 2022: 48.66%; 2021: 49.77%). Care for patients and service users 71.78% of staff said that care of patients or service users is their organisation's top priority (2024: 74.37%; 2023: 75.14%; 2022: 74.05%; 2021: 75.62%). 69.18% of staff agree that their organisation acts on concerns raised by patients or services users (2024: 70.90%; 2023: 70.62%; 2022: 69.15%; 2021: 72.10%) Workload and resources 46.51% of staff said they are able to meet all the conflicting demands on their time at work (2024: 47.20%; 2023: 46.53%; 2022: 42.79%; 2021: 42.85%). 56.06% of staff said they have adequate materials, supplies and equipment to do their work (2024: 58.01%; 2023: 58.33%; 2022: 55.45%; 2021: 57.15%). 32.82% of staff said there are enough staff at their organisation for them to do their job properly (2024: 33.98%; 2023: 32.24%; 2022: 26.21%; 2021: 26.89%).
  14. Community Post
    A patient safety study led by Principal Investigator Dr Josephine Ocloo, harmed patient, activist, and scholar, King's College London. Keeping patients safe is essential to our NHS, but there are also many examples of patients being harmed. We are conducting research to understand these experiences in more detail. Would you like to be involved? If you meet our study criteria, we can pay £50 for an interview for up to 60 minutes. We want to conduct interviews with diverse groups in the population who believe they have been harmed or experienced unsafe care in the healthcare process. You may be eligible to participate in this study if you: Are a harmed patient or a close family member of a harmed patient. Have any health condition. Live in England. Are aged 18 or older. Can provide informed consent. If you would like to take part, please email us at: [email protected] More details in the attached flyer: EPSPE - Flyer - final version (1).pdf
  15. News Article
    A trust’s staff “fear raising concerns about attitudes, behaviours and sexual safety”, particularly about senior managers and doctors, a review by NHS England has found. Black Country Healthcare Foundation Trust’s “Freedom to Speak Up” arrangements have been reviewed by NHSE, following a series of cultural concerns and the departure of multiple senior directors. The review, published in board papers this month, said: “We consistently heard that staff feel that ‘cover-ups’ take place and raising a concern sometimes feels like ‘reporting a friend to a friend’.” Staff gave recent examples of where they had experienced, or seen others experience, “disadvantageous and demeaning treatment” after raising concerns. Examples of this included inconsistent application of HR policies such as annual leave and flexible working to disadvantage the person raising concerns, unkind and unprofessional behaviour by senior staff members such as ignoring individuals, and not including them in conversations. Others said they did not want to raise concerns for fear of detriment, such as bank staff members who thought they would not be given shifts. Some staff felt as if they had a “target on their back” after speaking up. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 10 February 2026 Related reading on the hub: Speaking up for patient safety interview series
  16. Community Post
    The University of Portsmouth and Curistica, which is a clinical innovation consultancy, invite you to take part in a short survey — “Exploring patient use of AI in health management” — to share your views on how artificial intelligence might be used to support everyday health and wellbeing. Your feedback will help guide how AI tools are developed, to reflect real patient needs and concerns. The aim is to explore how individuals use artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to manage their health. By understanding patient attitudes, experiences, and the impact of AI in healthcare, the aim is to provide valuable insights that inform future advancements in this field. Your participation is key to the success of this research. Find out more and complete the survey here
  17. Community Post
    The Mesothelioma UK Research Centre is recruiting participants to take part in a survey for our study exploring scans and scanxiety experiences of adults with mesothelioma, pancreatic, brain and liver cancer. The study aims to explore people's scanxiety experiences, their care and support needs, as well as identifying interventions to alleviate and prevent scanxiety. This will help to understand and improve people's scanxiety. They are inviting people with or without scanxiety to take part in the online survey who are: A mesothelioma, pancreatic, brain or liver cancer patient Undergoing scans as part of your cancer care and Over the age of 18 Find out more here
  18. Content Article
    The Patients Association wants to hear your views on AI (Artificial Intelligence) in health and care settings, how AI is currently being used in your health and care, and how you think AI should be regulated in the UK. Your feedback will support the Patients Association in responding to a call for evidence by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). It is carrying out a consultation on how AI should be regulated when used in health and care settings to help inform the work of the recently established National Commission into the Regulation of AI in Healthcare. This survey will take around 10 minutes to complete.
  19. Content Article
    One in 20 outpatients in the United States experiences a diagnostic error each year, but there are no validated methods for collecting feedback from patients on diagnostic safety. This mixed-methods study in the Journal of Patient Safety examined patient experience surveys to determine whether patients’ free text comments indicated diagnostic breakdowns. The study aimed to evaluate associations between patient-perceived diagnostic breakdowns reported in free text comments and patients’ responses to structured survey questions. The authors concluded that patient feedback in routinely collected patient experience surveys is a valuable and actionable information source on diagnostic breakdowns in the ambulatory setting. The more easily monitored structured survey data provide a screening method to identify encounters that may have included a patient-perceived diagnostic breakdown and therefore require further examination.
  20. Content Article
    Co-designing solutions with patients is the best way to create engaging and impactful digital health solutions. The Patient Engagement Roadmap, a co-created, step-by-step guide aims to better integrate patient perspectives in the development of digital health solutions. Inspired by Patient Engagement Quality Guidance, Design Thinking, and Lean Startup methodologies, this roadmap will outline when and how to effectively engage patients for impactful co-design collaborations.  Patients, caregivers, innovators, health professionals, policy-makers and digital health experts from around the world are invited to take the survey.
  21. Content Article
    This report highlights the burden of health care-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the related harm to both patients and health workers in care settings. It also presents an updated global situation analysis of the implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) programmes at the national and health care facility levels, including a focus on the WHO regions. Headline points from this report include: On average, out of every 100 patients in acute care hospitals, seven patients in high-income countries (HICs), and 15 patients in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), will acquire at least one HAI during their hospital stay. Almost up to one third (30%) of patients in intensive care can be affected by HAIs, with an incidence that is two to 20 times higher in LMICs than in HICs, in particular among neonates. One in four (23.6%) of all hospital-treated sepsis cases are health care-associated and this increases to almost one half (48.7%) of all cases of sepsis with organ dysfunction treated in adult intensive care units. In 2023–2024, according to the system established to monitor the status of country progress towards the implementation of the AMR global action plan (the Tracking AMR Country Self-assessment Survey), 9% of countries did not yet have an IPC programme or plan. Only 39% of countries had IPC programmes fully implemented nationwide, with some being monitored for their effectiveness.
  22. News Article
    NHS bank staff are almost always more likely to recommend their employer as a good place to work than permanent staff. Results published this week found that 67% of responding bank staff would recommend their organisation as a place to work. This compares to 60% of substantive staff. The bank staff score increased slightly on last year, while that for salaried staff fell – again marginally. The survey, which is coordinated by Picker on behalf of NHS England, revealed a quarter (25.3% of bank staff reported experiencing at least one incident of physical violence from patients and the public in the last 12 months The proportion of bank workers experiencing discrimination from patients and the public has also risen, from 13.1 to 14.8%. Other results from the survey showed improvements in work-life balance and a reduction in burnout rates. Picker Group chief executive Chris Picker said: “These latest results paint a mixed picture of life as a bank-only worker in the NHS. “While many continue to benefit from the flexibility and improved work-life balance offered by bank roles, rising reports of incidents of violence and discrimination from patients and the public are a cause for concern, particularly for the many bank nursing and healthcare assistants reporting experiences of these unacceptable behaviours.” Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 17 April 2025
  23. News Article
    Almost one in 10 people reported experiencing harm from NHS care in the past 3 years, according to a survey led by the University of Oxford. The study, published in BMJ Quality & Safety, found that 9.7% of respondents reported harm, with 6.2% attributing it to the treatment or care received and 3.5% citing lack of access to services. Researchers noted that these findings exceed those of two previous British surveys which reported harm rates of 4.8% in 2001 and 2.5% in 2013. While acknowledging that the pandemic’s impact on healthcare access may have contributed to the higher figures, they said that the study highlights issues that “may be hidden from official data on patient safety.” As well as the withdrawal of medical care attributed to the pandemic, the increase could also be explained by using a broader definition of harm to include psychological as well as physical harm, the study authors suggested. Lead author of the new study, Dr Michele Peters, medical sociologist at the University of Oxford, told Medscape News UK : “In the past, harm has usually been measured using clinical rather than patient perspectives.” She explained that this emphasis tended to highlight harm associated with clinical errors rather than harm related to system issues, such as long waits for treatment. The latest study is one of the first to explicitly assess actions taken following harm due to lack of access to care. Around half of those awaiting treatment experienced physical or psychological consequences, with longer waits more common in deprived areas. “Current waiting list management approaches do recognise that some people are particularly vulnerable to deterioration during the waiting period,” Peters said. This means they may end up in poor condition when called for treatment. She noted that some interventions, such as weight management or smoking cessation support, aim to maintain patients’ health while they wait for procedures like hip replacements. Read full story Source: Medscape, 2 April 2025
  24. News Article
    Public satisfaction with the NHS is at a record low and dissatisfaction is at its highest, with the deepest discontent about A&E, GP and dental care. Just 21% of adults in Britain are satisfied with how the health service runs, down from 24% a year before, while 59% are dissatisfied, up from 52%, the latest annual survey of patients found. Satisfaction has fallen dramatically from the 70% recorded in 2010, the year the last Labour government left office, and the 60% found in 2019, the year before the Covid-19 pandemic. Mark Dayan, a policy analyst at the Nuffield Trust thinktank, which analysed the data alongside the King’s Fund, said the years since 2019 have seen “a startling collapse in NHS satisfaction. “It is by far the most dramatic loss of confidence in how the NHS runs that we have seen in 40 years of this survey.” A&E is the NHS service the public is least happy about. Satisfaction fell from 31% in 2023 to just 19% last year – the lowest proportion in the 41 years the British Social Attitudes (BSA) survey of the views of patients in England, Scotland and Wales has been carried out. Satisfaction with NHS dentistry has collapsed, too, from 60% as recently as 2019 to just 20% last year. More people (55%) are dissatisfied with dental care than with any other service. Similarly, fewer than a third (31%) of adults are satisfied with GP services. “The latest results lay bare the extent of the problems faced by the NHS and the size of the challenge for the government”, said Dan Wellings, a senior fellow at the King’s Fund. “For too many people, the NHS has become too difficult to access. How can you be satisfied with a service you can’t get into?” Read full story Source: The Guardian, 2 April 2025
  25. News Article
    Discrimination against NHS employees reached its highest level for the second year in a row, while one in seven experienced physical violence from the public, according to the 2024 annual staff survey. Results published for England showed the percentage of staff who had faced discrimination from the public in the past 12 months had risen from 8.5% in 2023 to 9.3% cent in 2024. The figure has reached its highest level since the question was first asked in 2019, when it was 7.2%, and has risen year-on-year post-pandemic. This has also increased among managers, team leaders and colleagues, from 8.4% in 2020 to 9.2% in 2024. More than half of respondents (54%) said the discrimination was due to their ethnic background. Survey results also found 14.4% of staff had faced violence from patients, their relatives or other members of the public in 2024. This figure has increased slightly from 13.9% in 2023 but is below levels seen during covid. More than 774,000 staff in England responded to 2024 survey between September and November 2024, the highest in its 20-year history, at a response rate of 50 per cent. This is up from 707,000 the previous year and 636,000 the edition before, out of a 1.5 million workforce. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 13 March 2025 Read Patient Safety Learning's response to the NHS Staff Survey
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.