Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Discrimination'.
-
News Article
Lord Mann's recommendations to tackle antisemitism accepted
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
NHS patients and staff will be better protected against hate, as the government has responded to Lord John Mann’s review of antisemitism and other forms of racism across the NHS and healthcare regulatory system, accepting all recommendations for the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and NHS England. In the wake of a series of horrific attacks on the Jewish community across the country, including shocking examples of intimidation and abuse within the health service, Lord Mann was commissioned by the former Secretary of State and the Prime Minister in October 2025 to lead an urgent review into how the NHS and its regulatory system recognises, reports and tackles antisemitism and other forms of racism. Lord Mann has heard that Jewish people in the NHS experience “routine ostracism”, with Jewish staff being the only religious group in the latest NHS staff survey for whom discrimination from colleagues is rising rather than falling, resulting in some considering leaving the NHS. The antisemitism identified extends to patients too. Some Jewish patients reported not wishing to present for treatment or putting off receiving important care. The government is clear that all racism in the NHS is abhorrent, and NHS employers are the first line of defence and must be taking urgent action. With 16% of Muslim staff and 20% of Black and minority ethnic staff also reporting discrimination in the last year, the reforms will benefit everyone who experiences hatred or abuse in the health service. The reforms include delivering mandatory antisemitism training for NHS leaders and introducing clear national guidance on uniform and responding to racist behaviour. Lord Mann said: "Jewish people have to be confident that they will receive the same treatment as everyone else, at all times in all situations. If people feel, as they do, that some have to hide their identity as patients or suffer in silence as staff, then the universality of the NHS is fundamentally breached. "The solutions are simple but require a consistency of approach across the whole of the NHS and clear leadership at the top and across all NHS trusts. The NHS as an employer must act as a responsible and inclusive employer and take the responsibility of making its employment and service to patients one that the entirety of the country, including our Jewish community, can feel and see is one that is for them as well as everybody else." Read full press release Source: Department of Health and Social Care, 4 June 2026- Posted
-
- Religion/belief
- Recommendations
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
An urgent review led by Lord John Mann examining how the NHS, including employers and UK health regulators, identify, report and respond to antisemitism and other forms of racism. Lord John Mann, the government independent advisor on antisemitism, was commissioned by the Secretary of State of Health and Social Care and the Prime Minister in October 2025 to lead a review into how the NHS and its regulatory system recognises, reports, and tackles antisemitism and other forms of racism, following multiple cases of intolerable antisemitism. Lord Mann’s report sets out a comprehensive set of recommendations to: strengthen accountability improve reporting and investigation processes embed an anti-racist culture across the health system to ensure that patients and staff are better protected from discrimination and abuse.- Posted
-
- Race
- Religion/belief
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
NHS antisemitism review finds Jewish staff and patients ‘suffer in silence’
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Jewish patients and staff within the NHS feel compelled to conceal their religious identity and "suffer in silence" due to antisemitism, according to Lord John Mann, who led a review into the issue. Lord Mann, the government’s independent adviser on antisemitism, who was tasked last year with examining the problem, urged the NHS to embody its role as "a responsible and inclusive employer". His review's recommendations, which are yet to be publicly released, are scheduled to be presented to Parliament on Thursday. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) revealed that Lord Mann’s investigation uncovered instances of "routine ostracism" experienced by some Jewish staff, leading some to contemplate leaving the health service entirely. The report is also anticipated to highlight that certain Jewish patients have expressed reluctance to seek treatment or have delayed crucial care within the NHS, citing concerns about antisemitism. Read full story Source: The Independent, 4 July 2026- Posted
-
- Religion/belief
- Discrimination
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
The Health Services Safety Investigation Body (HSSIB) released a new briefing, in partnership with the NHS Race and Health Observatory (NHSRHO), to raise awareness and encourage positive change around bias and discrimination in patient safety investigations at all levels across the NHS. This briefing is informed by contributions from a national roundtable held in November 2025. This collaborative event brought together individuals with lived experience, patient advocates, clinicians and senior healthcare leaders. The briefing identified a series of recommendations, which include: embedding explicit consideration of racism within investigation standards improving expectations for family involvement strengthening leadership accountability for equity ensuring more consistent use of data to identify inequalities anti-racism to be a core component of patient safety investigations robust mechanisms to monitor implementation and impact.- Posted
-
- Investigation
- Bias
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
Trust upgraded despite staff reports of discrimination and fear
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
A large acute trust has had its leadership rating upgraded from “inadequate”, despite serious concerns, including allegations that a board member made “divisive and discriminatory remarks” about a Ramadan initiative. University Hospitals Sussex Foundation Trust’s “well led” rating has moved to “requires improvement” in a Care Quality Commission report published. It said the trust had made progress since 2023 when its leadership was rated “inadequate”, and that there was “strong commitment from staff” and “effective partnership working in some areas”. Inspectors said the trust’s leaders were “passionate”, with “a clear intent… to improve”. They “understand what is required” and “the priority now is to deliver improvements with pace and purpose”, the CQC said. However, the inspection report listed some serious reservations and concerns. It said leaders still needed “to strengthen action to ensure fair and inclusive working conditions for all staff groups”. Staff told inspectors who visited in July last year that a non-executive director – who was not identified to the CQC – did not support an initiative to provide Muslim staff with fruit and drinks to break their fast during Ramadan, and had made “divisive and discriminatory remarks”. Other staff reported “fear and toxicity”, with “poor behaviours” from directors. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 8 May 2026- Posted
-
- Organisational Performance
- Organisational culture
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
This week is Black Maternal Health Awareness Week. Black women in the UK are still four times more likely to die in pregnancy and childbirth than white women. In this article, Sandra Igwe, Founder of the Motherhood Group, says Black Maternal Health Awareness Week is not a PR moment. It is a reckoning. For generations, Black women have been told, implicitly and explicitly, that they are built differently. That they can handle more. That their pain is manageable. That asking for help is weakness. That speaking up is aggression. This is not a cultural truth. It is a stereotype, and it is one that has been absorbed into healthcare systems in ways that cost lives. Further reading on the hub: House of Lords roundtable on Independent National Maternity and Neonatal Investigation: reflections from The Motherhood Group Addressing critical gaps in Black maternal mental healthcare: a new partnership project is launched (interview with Sandra Igwe)- Posted
-
- Maternity
- Health inequalities
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
Women are waiting too long for care because of “medical misogyny” within the NHS, the UK’s top gynaecologist has warned. Dr Alison Wright, president of the Royal College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (RCOG), warned that women’s health conditions are often prioritised differently to men’s, with chronic and debilitating conditions such as endometriosis not being given the attention they deserve. She also warned that A&E was being clogged up with women who need emergency treatment because they are waiting too long for routine procedures. Speaking to The Independent ahead of the government’s new health plan for women, published by health secretary Wes Streeting on Wednesday, she said: “Misogyny exists across society... sadly, I’m having to say this in 2026. “Women are not prioritised as they should be across the board, including when it comes to the health service. We, as gynaecologists, often have to really push for women to get a place in the operating theatre.” She added: “An example [a colleague] gave me recently was of a man who had a testicular torsion, which is often treated as an emergency and taken to the operating room very quickly. “Whereas, when a woman has a similar equivalent of torsion of her ovary, it’s not always treated as an emergency in the same way.” Dr Wright claimed that robots were brought into hospitals “very quickly” for male urology surgery, while gynaecologists had to “jump through hoops” for the same technology. Read full story Source: The Independent, 15 April 2026- Posted
-
- Discrimination
- Health inequalities
- (and 2 more)
-
News Article
Government announces crackdown on racist and antisemitic doctors in NHS
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
The Government is poised to introduce sweeping reforms aimed at making it significantly easier to dismiss doctors found to have engaged in racist or antisemitic conduct. The move, described as the biggest overhaul of the General Medical Council (GMC) in four decades, comes amid growing concerns over a perceived lack of swift action against medical professionals using discriminatory language. The Department of Health and Social Care has launched a consultation on legislative changes, citing "too many" recent instances of doctors, particularly on social media, using racist and antisemitic language without adequate regulatory response. The proposed reforms stem from a rapid review conducted by Lord Mann, commissioned last November to investigate antisemitism and other forms of racism within the health service. Among the initial recommendations from Lord Mann's review, which the government plans to consult on, are new powers for the GMC to challenge decisions made by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS). Additionally, the Professional Standards Authority, which oversees all health regulators, will be granted enhanced powers to scrutinise and contest such decisions. Read full story Source: The Independent, 24 March 2026- Posted
-
- Regulatory issue
- Race
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
There are many different types of bias, some more commonly known than others. This resource has been created to help explain different types of bias and to provide some practical examples of how some of these can impact patient safety. The content has been developed following a Patient Safety Education Network session led by Samia Sakuma, lead Quality Governance Lead for Paediatrics at West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Types of bias and practical examples Anchoring bias – Sticking with your initial impression. Example: "I was right the last time". Aggregate bias –- Assuming evidence from population groups applies equally to an individual patient. Example one: A frailty pathway recommends conservative management for older adults with pneumonia. An individual patient who is usually very active and independent is not considered for escalation early, despite clinical deterioration. Example two: Pain assessment guidance based on average recovery patterns following surgery leads staff to underestimate significant postoperative pain experienced by one patient whose response differs from expected norms. Ascertainment bias – Judgements influenced by prior expectations or contextual information. Example one: A patient known to attend frequently with abdominal pain is initially assessed as having another functional episode, delaying recognition of acute appendicitis. Example two: Documentation describing a patient as “anxious” influences subsequent assessments, resulting in physical symptoms initially being attributed to anxiety rather than investigated further. Availability bias – Where people overestimate the importance or likelihood of events based on how easily examples come to mind. Example: A patient comes in with flu-like symptoms, it must be flu as its flu season. The patient had strep A infection that was unresolved but this was not treated as the flu diagnosis took precedence. Base rate neglect – Ignoring how common or uncommon conditions are when making decisions. Example one: A a rare neurological diagnosis is prioritised in a patient with headache, while more common causes such as medication side effects or dehydration are considered later. Example two: Chest pain in a young adult is assumed to be musculoskeletal without structured assessment, despite cardiac conditions still occurring at a measurable background rate. Commission bias – Preference for action rather than watchful waiting, even when intervention may not help. Example one: antibiotics are prescribed for likely viral infection because active treatment feels safer than observation, exposing the patient to avoidable side effects. Example two: Additional imaging is requested despite low clinical indication, contributing to unnecessary radiation exposure and incidental findings. Confirmation bias/belief bias – the tendency to search for, interpret, favour and recall information in a way that confirms or supports one's prior beliefs or values or decisions. Example: Labelling a child at handover as a ‘drama queen’, thus anything that child does is interpreted through this lens. The child’s abnormal saturations were felt due to her being anxious and hyperventilating, however there was a genuine medical nonanxiety related need for oxygen, the child then had a respiratory arrest. Diagnostic momentum – A diagnostic label becomes accepted and passed along without reassessment. Example one: A patient admitted with a presumed urinary tract infection continues to be treated for this diagnosis despite lack of supporting results, delaying identification of sepsis from another source. Example two: An ambulance handover describing “stroke” leads teams to continue that pathway even after features inconsistent with stroke emerge. Framing effect – Where people’s decisions are influenced more by how information is presented than by the information itself. Example: What order do you present things. The first things you discuss are what stick in peoples minds. The language you use also frames something in a particular way. Calling a follow up protocol “Active surveillance” as opposed to “watchful waiting” can really make a big difference in whether people agree to this or not. Gamblers fallacy – The mistaken belief that past random events can influence the probability of future independent events. Example: sepsis is relatively rare. If you have treated two patients in a row with sepsis, when you see a third patient you don’t believe the sequence can continue so you will go out of your way to find a diagnosis that isn’t sepsis, whereas each patient should be assessed afresh. Over valuing bias/endowment effect – Causes individuals to overvalue what they own, often irrationally. Example: Spending time reading in depth articles on a medical condition such as mesenteric adenitis and reviewing guidance on managing this. Therefore diagnosing patient as having mesenteric adenitis because of the time expended on gathering and reviewing information on this thereby potentially missing another diagnosis. Psych-out error - Physical illness incorrectly attributed to mental health or behavioural causes. Example one: Agitation in a patient with known mental health needs is attributed to psychiatric relapse before delirium secondary to infection is recognised. Example two: Shortness of breath in a patient with anxiety history is initially managed as panic symptoms, delaying diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Sutton’s slip – Focusing on the most obvious or common explanation without adequate verification. Example one: a patient with recurrent falls is assumed to have mechanical instability, while medication-related hypotension is identified later. Example two: Hyperglycaemia in a person with diabetes is attributed to poor control, delaying recognition of steroid-induced glucose elevation. Visceral bias – Emotional reactions influencing clinical judgement. Example one: Challenging interactions during previous admissions unintentionally influence the urgency of reassessment when the patient re-attends unwell. Example two: A highly likeable patient’s reassurance that they feel “fine” reduces concern despite abnormal observations requiring escalation. Yin–yang out – Belief that a patient has already had extensive assessment, so further evaluation is unlikely to help. Example one: A patient with multiple previous admissions for chest pain receives limited reassessment because earlier investigations were normal, despite new symptoms. Example two: Repeated attendance with headaches leads to reduced diagnostic curiosity when new neurological signs develop. Zebra retreat – Avoiding consideration of rare diagnoses after being discouraged or corrected previously. Example one: After earlier feedback about over-investigating rare conditions, clinicians hesitate to pursue an uncommon metabolic disorder despite suggestive features. Example two: A rare drug reaction is not revisited because previous similar concerns were felt to be unlikely, delaying recognition when it genuinely occurs. -
Content Article
Independent investigations into failings in NHS maternity services have repeatedly exposed serious shortcomings in safety, quality, and organisational culture. These reviews were intended to generate learning and drive improvements, but with so many issues linked to racial and socioeconomic inequities, failure to build this into inquiries risks perpetuating avoidable harm. The NHS Race & Health Observatory conducted a document analysis of the three major independent investigations published over the past 15 years: Morecambe Bay, Shrewsbury & Telford, and East Kent. These high-profile, government commissioned reports were examined through an intersectional, antiracist lens to assess whether ethnicity, racism, and deprivation were meaningfully considered as drivers of maternal outcomes. Findings Patients’ ethnicity Across all three investigations, ethnicity was inconsistently addressed and often minimised. The Shrewsbury & Telford report acknowledged national disparities but failed to analyse local data, with nearly 9,300 missing ethnicity records. The East Kent and Morecambe Bay reports briefly noted poor treatment of ethnic minority women and to those born overseas but did not investigate systemic discrimination. In Morecambe Bay, concerns raised by families of ethnic minority patients were dismissed without comparative analysis. The limited attention to ethnicity undermines the relevance of recommendations for ethnic minority women. Workplace racism and staff experiences Workplace culture was a recurring theme, yet only the East Kent report explicitly identified racism among staff as a contributing factor to poor care. Allegations of racial abuse were often dismissed without resolution. In contrast, the Shrewsbury & Telford and Morecambe Bay reports described negative cultures but did not consider ethnicity as a source of conflict or harm. This reflects a broader failure to recognise racism within NHS workplaces and its impact on patient safety. Deprivation and maternal outcomes The Morecambe Bay and Shrewsbury & Telford reports acknowledged deprivation using national data but did not analyse its local impact. The East Kent report overlooked deprivation entirely. None of the investigations examined how deprivation intersects with ethnicity to worsen outcomes, despite evidence that economically disadvantaged ethnic minority women face compounded risks. Leadership failures Leadership failures—including poor oversight, defensive cultures, and high turnover—were common across all three reports. However, none explored whether racial discrimination contributed to leadership breakdowns or staff tensions. This omission reflects a reluctance to confront structural racism within NHS governance.- Posted
-
- Maternity
- Investigation
- (and 7 more)
-
News Article
‘Boys’ club’ shutting women out of private hospitals
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Just 6% of surgeons in private hospitals are women, says a report warning that a “private boys’ club” culture stops talented female doctors from getting work. Research by the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) found that for some specialties, such as orthopaedics, independent hospitals employ more male doctors than they do women. Overall, only 488 of 7,934 surgeons at the country’s biggest private hospital chains are women — substantially lower than the proportion of female surgeons in the NHS. More than half of the UK’s doctors are women, but surgery has traditionally been male-dominated and a series of reports in recent years warned of a culture of sexism and harassment. Professor Felicity Meyer, a consultant vascular surgeon and chair of the Women in Surgery forum at RCS England, said: “The independent sector now delivers a growing share of surgical care, yet women remain strikingly underrepresented within its surgical workforce. “RCS England’s own work has repeatedly shown that this is not just an issue of fairness, but one that affects the resilience, safety and sustainability of the profession as a whole and ultimately impacts patient safety." Read full story (paywalled) Source: The Times, 1 March 2026- Posted
-
- Discrimination
- Private sector
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
Progress has been made in reducing the “collective shame” of disproportionate employer referrals of doctors from ethnic minority backgrounds or who qualified outside the UK, the doctors’ regulator says. The General Medical Council says the proportion of employers with excess referrals in relation to a doctor’s ethnicity or place of qualification has now reduced by 48%—from 5.6% between 2016 and 2020 to 2.9% from 2020 to 2024. The difference in employer referral rates between ethnic minority and white doctors has also fallen by 61%—from 0.28% (0.58% ethnic minority doctors v 0.3% white doctors) to 0.11% (0.26% v 0.15%). For non-UK versus UK graduates, the difference in referral rates has dropped by 69%—from 0.42% (0.28% UK v 0.7% non-UK) to 0.13% (0.15% v 0.28%). The regulator says it is now on track to hit its target of eliminating disproportionate employer fitness to practise referrals by the end of 2026, a goal it set in 2021. Progress on eliminating discrimination in medical schools and training by 2031 has been much slower, however. Speaking to The BMJ, GMC chief executive Charlie Massey said, “Inequality and discrimination are pernicious and we should be ashamed collectively about the level of disadvantage that doctors from particular backgrounds face in the NHS.” He said, however, that the progress made so far is “pretty significant” and shows change is possible. “I don’t think any of us should be complacent. There’s still further distance to travel and we mustn’t let up now,” he said. Read full story Source: BMJ, 15 January 2026- Posted
-
- Discrimination
- Students
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
NHS staff who visit patients at home say St George’s flags can mean ‘no-go zones’
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
NHS staff who care for patients in their own homes fear some areas have become “no-go zones” for them because of the presence of St George’s flags, health leaders have said. Black and Asian staff have been left feeling “deliberately intimidated” as a result of the flags that were put up in many parts of England during the summer, according to the chief executive of one NHS trust in England, who asked to remain anonymous. “We saw during the time the flags went up, our staff, who are a large minority of black and Asian staff, feeling deliberately intimidated,” he said. “It felt like the flags were creating no-go zones. That’s what it felt like to them. You add on top of that real autonomous working, that real bravery of working in people’s homes, with an environment … [where] it feels like it’s an area that’s designed to exclude them.” He said his staff had felt intimidated, “and, if I’m honest, in many cases I think that’s what it was designed to feel like”, he added. The Royal College of Nursing said the fear created by the flags was part of an alarming wider picture. Prof Nicola Ranger, the union’s general secretary, said: “A sustained campaign of anti-migrant rhetoric is fuelling a growing cesspool of racism, including against international and ethnic minority nursing staff, without whom our health and care system would simply cease to function. “Those working in the community feel especially vulnerable and employers have a duty to ensure they are protected. “Following a summer of further racist disorder, it is little wonder a growing number of nursing staff report feeling unsafe, particularly when having to work on their own and often at night. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 11 November 2025 -
Content Article
This is a 2013 progress report that follows up on the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman and Local Government Ombudsman’s 2009 ‘Six Lives’ report which investigated the deaths of six people with learning disabilities, first highlighted by Mencap in their 2007 report ‘Death by Indifference’. The report covers: what has happened since the publication of the report in October 2010 in the areas the Department of Health said it would give immediate priority to. These areas include early learning from the Learning Disabilities Public Health Observatory, monitoring progress in the Confidential Inquiry into the premature deaths of people with learning disabilities, supporting improvements in the take-up of annual health checks for people with learning disabilities and promoting good practice. what the regulators – CQC, Monitor and the Equality and Human Rights Commission – have reported at the Ombudsmen’s request on what has happened in this area since 2010. progress and key developments in other areas since the 2010 report, which we believe will be very important in continuing to improve the healthcare of people with learning disabilities. These include new responsibilities for improving the healthcare of people with learning disabilities following changes to the health system since 2010. The report then looks at three other developments that will help to improve the health and wellbeing of people with a learning disability: work on identifying the determinants of good healthcare, addressed in the Health Equalities Framework for People with Learning Disabilities 2013. the development of Personal Health Budgets, including the commitment that everyone receiving Continuing Health Care will be offered a Personal Health Budget by 2014 developments on safeguarding in the Care Bill, crucial for this vulnerable group. The report includes an easy read summary.- Posted
-
- Learning disabilities
- Health inequalities
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
In this article, doctor and researcher Rageshri Dhairyawan discusses how the medical practice of silencing is a systemic issue that extends further than global health to every level of healthcare and research. She outlines how it predominantly affects the same minoritised communities that experience health inequities as well as other forms of social injustice, and exacerbates them.- Posted
-
- Patient engagement
- Organisational culture
- (and 4 more)
-
Content Article
This review by the UCL Institute of Health Equity (IHE) concludes that racism damages health and wellbeing and drives inequalities in London. Racism in the capital is widespread and persistent causing damage to individuals, communities and society as a whole. Its impacts are experienced in different ways and to varying levels of intensity related to individual experiences, socioeconomic position and other dimensions of exclusion such as disability, age and gender. The intersections with other dimensions of exclusion can amplify the effects of racism. The focus of this review is on the effects of racism on health and its contribution to avoidable inequalities in health between ethnic groups – a particularly unacceptable form of health inequity. It is urgent that society tackle the damage to health and wellbeing as a result of racism. The review is part of a series of evidence reviews funded by the Greater London Authority (GLA) to build the evidence for reducing health inequalities in London through action on specific social determinants of health. The other three reviews cover housing, the cost of living and adult skills.- Posted
-
- Health Disparities
- Health inequalities
- (and 8 more)
-
Content Article
Drawing on The King’s Fund’s five-year programme of work on health inequalities and tackling the worst health outcomes, which includes insights from stakeholders, partners and people with lived experience, this long read outlines what the King's Fund think the anticipated 10-year health plan should focus on to help the NHS do more to tackle these challenges. It includes a video from Stella O'Brien describing the barriers she has faced when accessing health and care services as a deaf person, and the importance of recognising patients and carers as assets. Seven priorities for the new 10-year health plan: Develop a cross-government health inequalities strategy for the 10-year health plan to feed into. Reorientate the NHS to focus on prevention. Radically change the relationships the NHS has with people and communities, from ‘power over’ to ‘power with’. Tackle racism and discrimination in the NHS and cultivate a culture of compassion. Enable staff to identify and act on health inequalities and capture learning. Empower place-based partnerships to take more decisions about how NHS money is spent. Actively support local voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) organisations through changes in financial planning and commissioning.- Posted
-
- Health inequalities
- Health Disparities
- (and 5 more)
-
News Article
Artificial intelligence in healthcare has left experts urging caution that a focus on predictive accuracy over treatment efficacy could lead to patient harm. Researchers in the Netherlands warn that while AI-driven outcome prediction models (OPMs) are promising, they risk creating “self-fulfilling prophecies” due to biases in historical data. OPMs utilise patient-specific information, including health history and lifestyle factors, to assist doctors in evaluating treatment options. AI’s ability to process this data in real time offers significant advantages for clinical decision making. However, the researchers’ mathematical models demonstrate a potential downside, namely, if trained on data reflecting historical disparities in treatment or demographics, AI could perpetuate these inequalities, leading to suboptimal patient outcomes. The study highlights the crucial role of human oversight in AI-driven healthcare. Researchers emphasise the “inherent importance” of applying “human reasoning” to AI’s decisions, ensuring that algorithmic predictions are critically evaluated and do not inadvertently reinforce existing biases. The team then created mathematical scenarios to test how AI may harm patient health and suggest that these models “can lead to harm”. “Many expect that by predicting patient-specific outcomes, these models have the potential to inform treatment decisions and they are frequently lauded as instruments for personalised, data-driven healthcare,” researchers said. “We show, however, that using prediction models for decision making can lead to harm, even when the predictions exhibit good discrimination after deployment. “These models are harmful self-fulfilling prophecies: their deployment harms a group of patients, but the worse outcome of these patients does not diminish the discrimination of the model.” Read full story Source: The Independent, 12 April 2025- Posted
-
- AI
- Discrimination
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
Discrimination hits record high for second year running
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Discrimination against NHS employees reached its highest level for the second year in a row, while one in seven experienced physical violence from the public, according to the 2024 annual staff survey. Results published for England showed the percentage of staff who had faced discrimination from the public in the past 12 months had risen from 8.5% in 2023 to 9.3% cent in 2024. The figure has reached its highest level since the question was first asked in 2019, when it was 7.2%, and has risen year-on-year post-pandemic. This has also increased among managers, team leaders and colleagues, from 8.4% in 2020 to 9.2% in 2024. More than half of respondents (54%) said the discrimination was due to their ethnic background. Survey results also found 14.4% of staff had faced violence from patients, their relatives or other members of the public in 2024. This figure has increased slightly from 13.9% in 2023 but is below levels seen during covid. More than 774,000 staff in England responded to 2024 survey between September and November 2024, the highest in its 20-year history, at a response rate of 50 per cent. This is up from 707,000 the previous year and 636,000 the edition before, out of a 1.5 million workforce. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 13 March 2025 Read Patient Safety Learning's response to the NHS Staff Survey- Posted
-
- Discrimination
- Staff factors
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
Antisemitic abuse rises within NHS and staff are the ‘worst culprits’
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
NHS staff are more likely than members of the public to perpetrate antisemitic abuse in hospitals and doctors’ surgeries since the October 7 Hamas attacks, according to complaints compiled by an influential charity. The file includes a Jewish doctor being given a hijab as a secret santa present and a patient having pro-Palestine stickers plastered across his room as he lay fighting for his life. Meanwhile, a group of therapists who complained about a colleague posting messages supporting Hamas online were subject to a countercomplaint for “micro-aggressions”. A patient waiting to be discharged from hospital was told: “Get your Jewish ambulance to come and get you.” Dave Rich, policy director at the Community Security Trust, said: “It is essential that hospitals and NHS trusts deal with this trend of rising antisemitism quickly and firmly and set a clear example that anti-Jewish prejudice has no place in the NHS.” Read full story (paywalled) Source: The Times, 6 March 2025- Posted
-
- Violence/ abuse
- Discrimination
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
Inside the fight to improve outcomes for Black cancer sufferers
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Getting tested for prostate cancer should’ve been easy for Paul Campbell. He wanted a check-up after seeing an advert on TV calling for men in their 40s to get thorough health checks. He asked his GP but was immediately questioned about why he – a man who seemed otherwise healthy – would want a check-up. “I had to fight my ground, I had to raise my voice. And eventually, I got the test,” Mr Campbell told The Independent. He was later diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer. “Had I not been assertive and pushy, by the time I found out, it would have been stage 4.” Mr Campbell is far from being alone in his experience. New research from the NHS Race and Health Observatory found “alarming levels” of discrimination towards patients from ethnic minorities and huge levels of mistrust in the NHS system. The survey of 2,680 people found only 55% trusted primary care to meet their health needs most or all of the time, while a third of south Asian participants said they either rarely or never trusted primary care to meet their health needs. On Friday, the NHS Race and Health Observatory roundtable brought together 20 key partners from local communities, the volunteer sector, the government and broader NHS to discuss the findings. Professor Habib Naqvi, chief executive, NHS Race and Health Observatory, said: “We cannot have a two-tier NHS based upon patient ethnicity, background or circumstances. This report reflects the clear need to bring speed and urgency to reform the NHS, so that patients do not face discrimination and systemic barriers when seeking healthcare.” These issues have a real impact on health outcomes. Read full story Source: The Independent, 9 March 2025 -
News Article
When doctors tried to work out whether Marie Tidball would need a specially designed birth plan, one asked her to lie fully clothed on the bed and spread her legs in the air so they could see how far they could open. The incident was one of several occasions when Tidball, now a Labour MP, felt neglected during her pregnancy and early motherhood because of the NHS’s failure to adapt on account of her physical disabilities. Tidball has physical impairments affecting all four of her limbs and had major surgeries on both her hips and legs as a child. She is speaking publicly about her experiences for the first time to highlight a report showing that disabled mothers and their children have significantly worse neonatal and postnatal NHS care than others. Speaking about the doctor’s request to open her legs, Tidball told the Guardian: “I was shocked, really, that that was their approach, rather than actually looking properly at some of my medical history and the notes around my hips. “They didn’t think about how that orthopaedic surgery might interact with birth, but also [about] carrying the baby and the way the baby was lying in uterus. They just hadn’t really thought those intersections through.” Read full story Source: The Guardian, 5 March 2025 Related reading on the hub Diagnostic safety: accessibility and adaptations– a (un)reasonable adjustment?- Posted
-
- Disability
- Maternity
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
California warns hospitals not to withhold trans youth healthcare
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
As Donald Trump seeks to block transgender youth healthcare across the country, California’s attorney general has sent a clear message to providers, reminding them of their duty to provide gender-affirming treatment under the state’s nondiscrimination laws. “The law requires [hospitals] to continue to provide gender-affirming care to our transgender community,” Rob Bonta, a Democrat who heads the California justice department, told the Guardian on Wednesday. “We will have the transgender community’s back. We will fight for their rights, for their protections, for their freedoms.” His comments come a week after Trump issued an executive order decreeing that medical institutions that receive federal funding and grants do not provide gender-affirming care, including hormone therapy and puberty blockers, to youth under age 19. In response, some hospitals have paused treatments, which are considered part of the standards of care for gender dysphoria endorsed by all major US medical associations. Trans patients, their families and civil rights groups have said the interruption of care could have dire consequences for patients’ physical and mental health. They’ve also argued that Trump’s order is unlawful, violating patients’ constitutional rights and parental rights, and that hospitals have no legal obligation to preemptively deny care, particularly while the policy is being challenged in court. On Tuesday, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA), a major local provider, said it was pausing the initiation of hormone treatments for trans youth. The hospital told the LA Times it was not starting new patients’ gender-affirming care while it evaluated Trump’s order “to fully understand its implications”, but said treatment for existing patients would continue. On Wednesday, Bonta wrote a letter to CHLA warning that “withholding services from transgender individuals based on their gender identity or their diagnosis of gender dysphoria” would violate the state’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, a longstanding law that prohibits discrimination against LGBTQ+ people. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 5 February 2025 -
News Article
US hospitals suspend healthcare for transgender youth after Trump order
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
In the wake of Donald Trump’s executive order threatening to withhold federal funding from hospitals that offer gender-affirming care to individuals under the age of 19, several major hospitals across the US have stopped providing such treatments. The 28 January executive order directed federal departments and agencies to ensure that hospitals and medical institutions receiving federal research or education grants stop providing puberty blockers, hormone therapy or surgical procedures to transgender youth under the age of 19. “It is the policy of the United States that it will not fund, sponsor, promote, assist or support the so-called ‘transition’ of a child from one sex to another and it will rigorously enforce all laws that prohibit or limit these destructive and life-altering procedures,” the order reads. In response, several hospitals around the country have stopped providing gender-affirming care procedures for those under 19 while they evaluate and assess the order. A spokesperson for Denver Health in Colorado told the Associated Press that the hospital had stopped providing gender-affirming surgeries for individuals under the age of 19, to comply with the executive order and continue receiving federal funding. In a statement posted to its website, Denver Health said that it was “working to understand and comply with the full implications of the broadly worded order” and that “guidance on changes to medical care is being handled privately so that we can best support our patients and their families”. The Denver hospital said it was “deeply concerned for the health and safety of our gender diverse patients under the age of 19”. “We recognize this order will impact gender-diverse youth, including increased risk of depression, anxiety and suicidality,” the hospital stated. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 3 February 2025 -
Content Article
This research examined sexual misconduct occurring in surgery in the UK, so that more informed and targeted actions can be taken to make healthcare safer for staff and patients. A survey assessed individuals’ experiences with being sexually harassed, sexually assaulted, and raped by work colleagues. Individuals were also asked whether they had seen this happen to others at work. Compared with men, women were much more likely to have seen sexual misconduct happening to others, and to have it happen to them. Individuals were also asked whether they thought healthcare-related organizations were handling issues of sexual misconduct adequately; most did not think they were. The General Medical Council (GMC) received the lowest evaluations. The results of this study have implications for all stakeholders, including patients. Sexual misconduct was commonly experienced by respondents, representing a serious issue for the profession. There is a widespread lack of faith in the UK organizations responsible for dealing with this issue. Those organizations have a duty to protect the workforce, and to protect patients. Further reading: Breaking the silence: Addressing sexual misconduct in healthcare Calling out the sexist and misogynist culture within healthcare: a blog by Dr Chelcie Jewitt, co-founder of the Surviving in Scrubs campaign GMC's Good medical practice 2024- Posted
-
- Womens health
- Organisational culture
- (and 7 more)