Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Older People (over 65)'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Digital health and care service provision
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Apps for health and care
    • Teleservices
    • Other health and care software
    • Digital health regulatory bodies/standards/guidance
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Patient Safety Alerts
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Transformative Simulation
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • Patient Safety Standards
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


First name


Last name


Country


About me


Organisation


Role

Found 358 results
  1. News Article
    GPs in England are so “overloaded” that they cannot help older people who are at risk of falling in what NHS bosses accept is an unacceptable failure of care, the House of Commons’ public accounts committee has said. Pressure on GPs’ time has intensified as a result of the government’s decision to give patients online access to their services, according to a report by the influential cross-party group of MPs. The committee found that GPs are doing too little to tackle falls even though they are the most common cause of death from injury among over-65s, cause tens of thousands of hip fractures, add to hospitals’ workloads and cost the UK an estimated £4.4bn a year. Family doctors in England are obliged under the terms of their contract to identify, assess and support people over 65 with moderate or severe frailty. However, “many GPs are not currently able to deliver on these requirements”. During 2024/25 just 17% of those patients were assessed. Only 18% of the 226,000 people who were diagnosed with severe frailty that year were assessed for their risk of falling and only 16% underwent a review of the medication they were taking. Prof Victoria Tzortziou Brown, the president of the Royal College of GPs, said the report vindicated its warnings that “prioritising online access to our services without equal focus on continuity and proactive care may have unintended consequences for other areas of care, and risks disadvantaging some of our most vulnerable patients. “While most GP practices will always try to offer their older patients the time they need, this is increasingly challenging against a backdrop of intense workloads and workforce pressures while also responding to increasing demand and policy requirements to improve access.” Read full story Source: The Guardian, 3 June 2026
  2. News Article
    Calcium and vitamin D supplements are ineffective at preventing falls and fractures in older people, a review has concluded. Despite their common prescription on the NHS for those at risk of osteoporosis or fracture, and widespread public use for bone health, the comprehensive study found no evidence to support their regular intake specifically for this preventative measure. Published in the British Medical Journal, the research, led by academics in Quebec, Canada, meticulously analysed 69 clinical trials encompassing 153,902 individuals. Their investigation delved into the risk of any fracture, hip fractures, bone breaks occurring outside the spine, spinal fractures, and the overall frequency of falls. The results showed that there was “little to no effect” on the risk of any fracture from taking calcium supplements, vitamin D supplements or both of them combined. The team said almost a third of people aged 65 and over experience at least one fall every year. “As much as 85% of older adults have a fear of falling because of a fall, contributing to reduced daily functioning and increased risk of subsequent falls,” they added. “Furthermore, half of women and one fifth of men will sustain a low trauma fracture during their lifetime, often due to a fall.” They acknowledged some of the trials were small and had few people, and said the results may not apply to people with specific bone disorders or to those receiving drug treatment for osteoporosis. However, they concluded their findings “do not support routine supplementation with calcium or vitamin D, or combined supplementation to prevent fractures and falls” and they suggested doctors, guideline panels and regulatory agencies “should re-evaluate their general recommendations for calcium and vitamin D supplementation in light of current evidence.” Read full story Source: The Independent, 20 May 2026
  3. News Article
    GP surgeries are forcing elderly patients to book appointments online, against NHS rules, a survey suggests. As many as one in three people aged 75 or over surveyed by a charity said they were made to submit online forms to see a doctor. This is despite the GP contract requiring all practices to allow patients to book over the phone or in person if they prefer. The NHS says all practices should offer a range of booking methods. There is no evidence that any surgeries have been punished for not following the NHS rules. Critics warned that practices were operating with impunity and “should lose funding” if they were found to be flouting contract requirements. The results are part of a report by Re-engage, a charity fighting loneliness in old age, which said older people were being “dehumanised” and “excluded” by the digital-first approach. The charity’s report, Care On Hold, revealed findings from a survey of 926 older people based on their real-world experiences of accessing GP services. The authors warned that forcing elderly people to book online left them without healthcare appointments. The report also warned that some patients were instead getting help from emergency services, self-treating, or going untreated. Read full story (paywalled) Source: The Telegraph, 4 May 2026
  4. Content Article
    This report finds that one in three people aged 75 and over can only get to see their doctor if they book digitally, and the same proportion feel they are cut off from care. With nearly 90% of older people still trying to make appointments by phone or in person, Re-engage believes many of them are being cut off from their doctor, which risks increasing their loneliness and isolation. The report calls on UK governments to make accessing GP appointments easier for older people as many practices continue to insist on online bookings only. Key recommendations Embed in NHS digitalisation strategies the right for people to choose between digital or offline access when using health services, ensuring that digitalisation does not replace the option of non‑digital contact. Include in GP contracts a condition that analogue routes remain available by making non‑digital access a protected component of health digitalisation policy, so that no one is required to go online to receive care. Ensure older people are directly involved in shaping digital health policy and service design, so decisions reflect the needs and experiences of those most affected. Centrally collect and publish data from Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) and health boards on both digital and analogue access, broken down by age, gender, disability and ethnicity, to make the impact of digitalisation visible and identify any groups disproportionately affected.
  5. Content Article
    There were more than 2.3 million A&E visits during December 2025, with more than 400,000 people admitted to hospital. Resident doctors were also on strike for five days in December, putting hospitals under even greater pressure than usual. Of those admitted to hospital as emergencies, one in four people waited over four hours between admission and staff finding them a bed. One in ten waited over 12 hours. To understand people’s winter A&E experiences, Healthwatch reviewed their feedback on urgent and emergency care from December 2025, focusing on older people. Older and/or frail patients are at greater risk of harm under corridor care, including falls, dehydration and delirium, according to a Health Services Safety Investigation Body report published last month.  Related reading on the hub: Corridor care and patient safety Corridor care guidance needs to move beyond what “should” happen and grapple honestly with why it isn’t (a blog by Claire Cox) The crisis of corridor care in the NHS: patient safety concerns and incident reporting
  6. News Article
    Exhausted NHS staff have told how a woman was tragically left to die alone on a trolley in a crowded A&E corridor. Staff at Arrowe Park Hospital's emergency department in Merseyside said they have reached breaking point as they are repeatedly faced with more patients than they can safely care for. Wirral University Teaching Hospital Trust (WUTH) said the hospital's A&E department is experiencing "extremely high demand", with attendances around 30 per cent higher than expected for this time of year. Daily patient numbers have exceeded 330, peaking at 370 on some days in December. Read full story Source: The Mirror, 11 January 2026
  7. News Article
    Two men died a day apart after suffering head injuries in separate unwitnessed falls at an overstretched south London hospital. David Ward, 76, died at St George's Hospital in Tooting on 10 February 2024, while Dr Debapriya Ghosh, 83, died the following day. Fiona Wilcox, Senior Coroner for Inner West London, has written to the health secretary, saying the cases highlighted "impossible situations where demand clearly exceeds available resource". A spokesperson for St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust has offered their condolences to the families, adding that "immediate changes" were made following their deaths. Read full story Source: BBC News, 11 January 2026
  8. News Article
    England’s chief medical officer says infections in older people must be taken “much more seriously”. Professor Sir Chris Whitty said older people are “under-served” when it comes to care and research into the illnesses affecting them, adding that doctors should have a lower threshold for prescribing antibiotics than they do for younger adults. He suggested the medical community has been “nihilistic” about infections in older people historically, adding that “people have assumed it’s one of those things that happen in old age – in fact, we can do a lot about it”. Discussing his new annual report, which focuses on infections, Sir Chris said: “Whilst we are very systematic about reducing infections and preventing infections in children and in young adults, in older adults it is often a lot more hit and miss.” Read full article. Source: The Independent, 4 December 2025
  9. Content Article
    Infections are ubiquitous – over the course of our lifetimes we will all experience multiple episodes of infection. In his annual report for 2025 the Chief Medical Officer for England, Professor Chris Whitty, focuses on recent trends in infections and changes to the health system, laying out current challenges and considering what comes next. The report highlights around seven key themes: Preventing infection in older adults can significantly improve overall health and quality of life. Controlling specific infections has proven highly successful in preventing certain cancers. Infections in pregnancy and the neonatal period still present significant risks. Easily underestimated but potentially very harmful diseases are increasing due to gradually declining coverage of routine vaccinations in children and young adults over the last decade. The burden and range of infections imported into the UK has increased over the last decade. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) continues to be a major risk. The periodic occurrence of significant new epidemics and pandemics as a natural consequence of emerging and evolving infections is predictable, even if the timing of their onset and infection is not.
  10. News Article
    Elderly patients have been left languishing in their own excrement and puddles of urine for hours on end in NHS hospitals, a major charity has said. Corridor care is a “crisis in plain sight” in A&Es across the country, charity Age UK warned ministers, as it described “truly shocking” incidents of poor care of elderly people waiting days on end for attention. In a new report, The Longest Wait, Age UK revealed “heartbreaking” incidents of poor care, including a woman dying from a heart attack after being left to wait; a patient who was “lost” after being put on a disused corridor; and a man left hooked up to an IV drip in a chair for 20 hours, who soiled himself because he was unable to get to the toilet. Age UK warned that many patients are unwilling to go to A&E, even if they are in a life-threatening situation, because of their past experiences. It called on the government to “urgently” tackle corridor care as it warned that older people are disproportionately affected. Read full article. Source: The Independent, 31 October 2025 Related reading Corridor care and patient safety - a series of blogs shining a light on some of the key patient safety issues surrounding corridor care
  11. Content Article
    10 years ago, waiting 12 hours in A&E was a rarity. Now long waits are routine, happening during 1 in 10 major A&E attendances. In this report, the charity Age UK sets out the devastating impact that corridor care and long accident and emergency waits can have on older people. They argue that this is a crisis hiding in plain sight in our hospitals and that the Government need to act urgently to tackle this. You can find further articles and reports on the patient safety issues surrounding corridor care here. The report highlights that: 1 in 3 (one third or 32%) of those aged 90 and older are waiting 12 hours or more in A&E to be admitted or discharged home in 2024/25. The number of instances of ‘corridor care’ of 12 hours or more has increased 525-fold since 2015/16. Between 2019/20 and 2024/25 the number of attendances to A&E that resulted in a 12-hour wait for a bed increased by nearly 2000%. Last year, 532,451 people experienced corridor care of 12 hours or more. It calls for the Government to implement the following package of measures: Urgently produce a funded operational plan to reduce the number of long A&E waits and end Corridor Care, with specific deadlines and milestones. Establish a robust system to collect and publish regular data on Corridor Care (as well as long A&E waits), and their impacts on the public, including by age and ethnicity. Make a Minister in the Department of Health and Social Care accountable for reducing long A&E waits and ending corridor care and require them to report on progress to Parliament every six months. Turbo-charge a peer learning programme for hospitals and local health organisations (Integrated Care Boards) to share proven solutions, tackle barriers to discharge and protect and support NHS staff. Work at pace to implement the 10 Year Health Plan, especially the ‘hospital to home’ shift and creation of a Neighbourhood Health Service, ensuring social care and the VCSE (Voluntary Community and Social Enterprise) are fully involved – so fewer older people need to go to A&E in the first place.
  12. Content Article
    We hear time and time again on the hub about the lack of joined up care and communication within and across organisations. Patients and their families and carers not knowing who to contact to chase up a referral, having to travel miles for appointments, miscommunication, diagnostic errors, or having to repeat the patient’s history and medications to every new healthcare professional they see because the notes haven’t been shared or clinicians "don’t have time to read them all". These issues are widespread and urgently need to be addressed if we are to prevent people falling through the gaps and suffering worse health outcomes. In this blog, David* shares his story about his elderly sister and a mix up with an urgent referral which led to a near miss. Background My sister has cancer and she's got a diagnosis of dementia too. The cancer is very aggressive and it causes her a lot of pain. Her care team are managing her pain very well. Due to her age and frailty, chemotherapy was out of the question but she had surgery and it seemed to go well. She was having routine check ups post-op to monitor her. An urgent referral A few months later unfortunately the cancer came back and we got an urgent referral from her GP for her to see her consultant. So when within a couple of weeks we got an invite to the hospital for an appointment we assumed it was for her urgent cancer referral. When we got to the appointment, neither the consultant or her advanced nurse practitioner team, who were all familiar with her diagnosis and history, were there. Instead there was a junior doctor on his own. He asked my sister how she had been since her surgery and was she doing well. When my sister said, well no, the tumour had grown significantly and we think the cancer had come back, he went white and rushed out of the room saying he needed to speak to someone else. Communication issues He came back and said my sister would need 20 days of successive radiotherapy in the hospital (which is at least a two-hour round trip). We had many questions we wanted to ask but he wasn’t able to answer them, and I was very concerned whether this was the right course of treatment for her. There were a number of issues—I had questions about how aggressive the cancer was, whether the cancer had spread elsewhere, whether this was palliative or curative treatment, what impact this would have on my sister’s health. Radiotherapy is harsh and my sister was physically very frail. In the end, because I phoned the advanced nurse practitioner and explained what had happened and my concerns, we were invited back for another appointment, and a few days later we saw the consultant. On the advice given, my sister was told about the significant risks and unsuitability of radiotherapy because of her co-morbidities and she decided not to go ahead with the radiotherapy. This was a relief as I didn’t want her to have unnecessary treatment, especially treatment that would not address her cancer and make her remaining months painful and distressing. The consultant was wonderful, and I’ve written him a lovely letter thanking him, but there has been a big communication issue here which could have led to a different outcome altogether. A 'near miss' The issues here, as I see them, are that the urgent referral got mixed up with the routine post-op appointment, which led to a doctor in training being placed in a situation for which he was untrained and unprepared in making significant treatment decisions. The advice he received and acted upon was from an unnamed consultant who didn’t even speak with or examine my sister. There is also the fact that they didn’t have a conversation with my sister about her options and they just told her she needed the radiotherapy. This is not informed consent! If we hadn't been there with her and questioned it, would she have had that course of treatment, accepted the radiotherapy, even though it was completely unnecessary, which would have led to avoidable harm? This really is a big ‘near miss’. What would have happened if she hadn’t had anyone there to intervene and advocate for her. She has absolute confidence in the health system but, for her family trying to navigate the system, this was incredibly stressful. What happens to the patients who haven’t got a family around to support and advocate for them? We need to look at the whole care pathway and try to design it from the patient and family’s perspective. *The names in this blog have been changed to ensure anonymity. Are you a patient, relative or carer frustrated with navigating the healthcare system? Or is your GP practice or Trust doing something innovative to make it easier for patients? We would love to hear your stories. Please add to our community forum (you will need to register with the hub, it's free and easy to sign up) or email us at [email protected]. Related reading The challenges of navigating the healthcare system: Margaret's story The challenges of navigating the healthcare system: Sue's story Navigating the healthcare system as a university student: My personal experience Lost in the system? NHS referrals "I love the NHS, BUT..." Preventing needless harms caused by poor communication in the NHS (DEMOS, November 2023) Robust collaborative practice must become the bedrock of modern healthcare Robbie: A homeless patient’s struggles with the system Digital-only prescription requests: An elderly woman sent round the houses Lost in the system: the need for better admin Digital-only prescription requests: An elderly woman sent round the houses
  13. Content Article
    We hear time and time again on the hub about the lack of joined up care and communication within and across organisations. Patients and their families and carers not knowing who to contact to chase up a referral, systems not joined up, lack of communication, having to repeat the patient’s history and medications to every new healthcare professional they see because the notes haven’t been shared or clinicians "don’t have time to read them all". These issues are widespread and urgently need to be addressed if we are to prevent people falling through the gaps and suffering worse health outcomes. In this blog, *Margaret shares her and family's experiences of trying to coordinate their elderly father's upcoming surgery. Interoperability issues My father has dementia and has a complex set of health issues, as a lot of elderly people do. He has a number of comorbidities, including vascular, heart, and cognition and memory problems, that has meant coordinating his care between the care home, his GP, the local hospital and a specialist hospital has been quite complex. There have been multiple issues but there were two that stood out. The first issue was at the diagnostic stage. My father has severe vascular problems and he needed fairly urgent and necessary surgery. In order to assess whether he was suitable for surgery, given his heart condition, he needed a scan. We have had problems in the past in getting access to scans on his heart so the GP said in order to move things on quicker it would be good to get the scan done privately. As the surgery was urgent, we paid to get the scan done at a private diagnostic centre. However, when it came to getting the information from the private diagnostic centre to the tertiary hospital where he was being treated we encountered problems. The hospital couldn’t access the scans from the private hospital because they were two different systems which meant there was an interoperability issue as the two systems ‘didn’t talk to each other’. One of the suggestions I was given was that I could drive to the private diagnostic centre, which was about a 40 mile drive from my house, with a CD, and then they would download the scans onto the CD and I could then drive back to the hospital, which was about another 35 mile drive. There were multiple calls and this was really quite distressing for our family because we knew my father needed access to the scans urgently. In the end they said they’d do another scan in the hospital. Although I don't think there were any kind of safety issues with my father having another scan, it did mean that not only did it cause delays and stress for my father and the family, it was also a cost to the NHS, which could have been avoided. Communication problems between departments Then around the same time, the hospital wanted to do another scan on my father to prepare for the surgery. Again, as it was urgent, I kept ringing the hospital asking if he had his scan yet but because my father was under the vascular and cardiac departments it was often difficult to know who to speak to because one department needed information from the other and they hadn't received it. So I’d get through to one department who then told me to phone another department, or I would be put on hold by someone from admin who didn’t know the answer and would say they’d ring back but didn’t because they were very busy. As a carer/relative you don’t know what’s happening and you become worried that your loved one is lost in the system. I persisted in phoning but, coincidentally, at the same time my sister visited my father’s house to pick up some bits for him. She saw there was a letter from the hospital so she opened it and it was a letter inviting my father in to have an outpatient appointment scan in the hospital he was an inpatient in! I ended up going to PALS. The lady I spoke to was understanding, sympathetic, kind and highly efficient. But she told me this happened all the time as the radiology department doesn't have access to the hospital's IT system, so they wouldn't know my father was an inpatient and would have just invited him in in a timely way but they would have done that as if he was an outpatient. I coordinated between the different departments and we finally got the scan for my father, he had the surgery and survived. However, these delays could have compromised his health because the surgery was urgent and if he had deteriorated whilst waiting that may have killed him. As a family we were very conscious that time was of the essence and we had to push continuously. Lack of information given to families These are just two examples from a multiple of occasions where we as a family were trying to get information. My father was elderly and wouldn’t have questioned the doctor. And because of his cognition issues due to his dementia, and also because he was on high doses of pain medication, he becomes confused and we couldn’t always rely on what he told us. However, often the healthcare professionals wouldn’t tell us things, despite me being next of kin and with documented power of attorney, and told us to speak to my father. So as a carer or relative you are trying to join the dots and work within a health system that isn’t coordinated. What I want to see change On the face of it they may seem like quite small examples, but when they build up, they are significant in terms of risk. My father was a high-risk patient and if it wasn’t for our diligence and persistence he would have fallen through the cracks, to a significant detriment to his health. I didn’t want there to be avoidable harm, an investigation and ‘lessons learned.’ I want us to be working in a coordinated and proactive manner to recognise the risks and void any harm. And for that insight to be used to ensure systems and processes are improved for the benefit of other patients and families. Also, I want opportunities to share my experience, not as a formal complaint but for genuine interest in our family’s customer experience. Again, for learning and future preventative action not for blame. *The names in this blog have been changed to ensure anonymity. Are you a patient, relative or carer frustrated with navigating the healthcare system? Or is your GP practice or Trust doing something innovative to make it easier for patients? We would love to hear your stories. Please add to our community forum (you will need to register with the hub, it's free and easy to sign up) or email us at [email protected]. Related reading The challenges of navigating the healthcare system: David's story The challenges of navigating the healthcare system: Sue's story Navigating the healthcare system as a university student: My personal experience Lost in the system? NHS referrals "I love the NHS, BUT..." Preventing needless harms caused by poor communication in the NHS (DEMOS, November 2023) Robust collaborative practice must become the bedrock of modern healthcare Robbie: A homeless patient’s struggles with the system Digital-only prescription requests: An elderly woman sent round the houses Lost in the system: the need for better admin Digital-only prescription requests: An elderly woman sent round the houses
  14. Content Article
    Amanda Wynn is an independent consultant, researcher and trainer based in Cambridgeshire, specialising in older and disabled survivors of domestic abuse and sexual violence. In this blog, Amanda talks about her recent research into sexual assaults against older people by hospital staff. She shares an overview of her findings and calls for greater awareness and support. Motivated by a patient death I undertook my first research into sexual assaults against older people by hospital staff in 2021, after reading about the horrific case of an older patient who died from internal haemorrhaging due to severe vaginal injuries. A member of staff was arrested on suspicion of rape, but ultimately was not charged. I found it staggering that more people weren't aware of what happened to this lady. After placing a post saying as much on social media, I received messages indicating that this wasn't the isolated case I assumed it was. I was curious to know how often older people in hospital are being sexually assaulted by staff - people in positions of trust who should be caring for patients. So, I decided to find out for myself. The findings: increasing numbers, bias and poor support As I don't receive any funding for my research, I had to rely on freedom of information (FOI) requests to get data from NHS England trusts. I looked at the number of incidents reported to staff and recorded on the hospital’s incident system over a 5 year period, from 2016/17 to 2020/21 (financial years). My first paper highlighted at least 75 incidents of sexual assault against patients aged 60+ in NHS Hospitals in England, where the alleged perpetrator was a member of staff. I was surprised by the numbers but also at the responses to the follow-up questions I asked about support for these survivors. In the vast majority of cases, there was no referral to specialist services. Only 21% (16) of the incidents recorded were reported to police. Of these 16, all but two had ‘no further action’ taken. I don’t have the data on how the other two progressed so it is unclear whether any convictions were made. I was keen to review the data to see if anything had changed, so I undertook a similar research project in early 2024. This time, the number of reported incidents was much higher over a shorter reporting period (at least 274 incidents over three years). Once again, the number of victims being referred to Sexual Assault Referral Centres or specialist support was very low. Responses to both sets of FOI requests included anecdotal comments from professionals making worrying assumptions about the reliability of people with dementia when disclosing sexual assault. It was also interesting to note that male victims in reported incidents had a higher prevalence than male victims of sexual assault in general - potentially highlighting an increased risk of sexual assaults against older men in hospital. Limited data but a sad fundamental truth Due to lack of funding for my research, I was able to merely touch the surface and report only quantitative data. That means I am unable to determine if the increase in the number of reported incidents is due to more sexual assaults against older people happening. Or if improved reporting and data recording methods can account, either fully or partially, for the increase. However, what is clear is that older patients in hospital are at risk of sexual assault from the very people who should be assuring their well-being and safety. Opportunity for positive change to reduce harm The main aim of my research is to raise awareness of the issue among front-line professionals. Whilst this can include the potential perpetrators, most will be the people who are best placed to stop such incidents, and to ensure an appropriate response when an incident is reported. NHS England has strengthened its approach to domestic abuse and sexual violence in recent years with duties placed on staff to record and report incidents. There may still be some complacency about how genuine patient reports are though, and therefore less emphasis on support. It's also important for both health care staff and the general public to be aware that sexual assaults in hospital do happen. More awareness of the issue will hopefully lead to more survivors being able to disclose and getting the right support when they do. I would like to develop some training for health and social care staff around responding to disclosures of sexual assault and violence from older people - this will likely be in an eLearning format - but I am keen for access to the training to be free. Too much essential knowledge sits behind paywalls making it prohibitive for the target audience to access. I have the content, but if anyone can help with a platform for hosting and developing online training it would be great to hear! You can contact me at [email protected] if you would like to hear more about my research or the online training. Hopes for the future I would like all health and social care workers to be much more aware of sexual assault against older people - not just in hospitals but in care homes and the community too. Funding for services needs research and data to back it up - my research only touches the edge of the issue and it would be great if more research and eventually specialist support for older survivors of sexual violence can lead on from it. I’d just like to add that I'm really grateful to Hourglass for publishing my research to help get the word out as wide as possible. And, of course, to Patient Safety Learning for giving me the opportunity to share the findings too. Related reading Sexual violence and assault against older people in NHS hospitals in England (2024) Doctors practising despite sexual assault and rape allegations Hundreds of social care residents allegedly sexually assaulted, watchdog reveals Share your insights If you would like to comment on this article or any of the articles published on the hub, please sign up here (for free) and contribute your thoughts and insights below. If you'd like to write about a patient safety issue, experience or improvement project, please read our guide to writing a blog, or contact the editorial team at [email protected].
  15. Content Article
    People with frailty, particularly severe frailty, are at risk of some of the poorest outcomes from hospital care; their care also consumes the highest resource. How can research help? This National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Collection looks at how research could improve care for people with frailty in hospitals and in the community.
  16. Content Article
    The National Audit of Inpatient Falls (NAIF) is a continuous audit of all inpatients who have a fall that results in a femoral fracture. This report looks at clinical data on falls collected in 2023. Based on 1,609 cases, it states that falls prevention activity should not focus solely on older people’s wards, finding that nearly half of all inpatient femoral fractures (IFFs) occur on general medical wards. To address the potential for harm caused by hospital-acquired deconditioning, this report presents a new approach to risk factor assessment that focuses on promoting activity to ensure each patient is fit to move as safely as possible. This covers factors such as vision, medication review, delirium, mobility and continence, and provides information on the proportion of patients affected by each in 2023, compared to 2022 and 2021. It contains five key recommendations, four of which state that Trusts and health boards should: Review their policies and practice to ensure that older hospital inpatients are enabled to be as active as possible Ensure that there are robust governance processes in place to understand when post-fall checks fail to correctly identify a fall related injury’ Have processes in place to hasten time to administration of analgesia after an injurious fall Prepare for the audit expansion in January 2025. The fifth recommendation states that NHS England and the Welsh Government should implement national drivers to ensure that all older people are screened for delirium upon hospital admission and reviewed for changes suggestive of a new onset of delirium for the duration of their admission.
  17. Content Article
    This study aimed to systematically evaluate interventions and effects that promote involvement in medication safety among older people with chronic diseases and to provide new ideas and references for developing standardised and effective intervention strategies to improve patient involvement in medication safety.
  18. Content Article
    On 27 March 2024 an investigation took place into the death of Sewa Kaur Chaddha, then aged 82. Mrs Chaddha had been living with her husband in Slough. They both had a number of physical health conditions requiring multiple prescribed medications. They both had cognitive impairment due to their age. On 5 May 2023 Mrs Chaddha was found collapsed on the floor at their home. It was discovered that she had been taking her husbands medication instead of her own for several days, including diabetes medication. Her blood sugar levels were found to be extremely low. She died on 10 May 2023 at Wexham Park Hospital of hyponatraemia caused by the necessary treatment for hypoglycaemia which was in turn caused by the accidental ingestion of hypoglycaemic medication. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 24 May 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was accident, the medical cause of death being: I a Hyponatraemia I b Treatment for hypoglycaemia I c Ingestion of hypoglycaemic medication II Frailty of old age, decompensated heart failure, cognitive impairment. Matters of Concerns The medications were provided to the couple by the local pharmacy, then known as Lloyds Pharmacy, in separate dosset boxes. Mrs Chaddha’s medications were provided on a weekly basis. Mr Chaddha’s were provided on a monthly basis. Both patients were elderly and had cognitive impairment. (The two patients’ dosset boxes were identical to each other except for a small pharmacist’s label with small type with the relevant patient’s name. Mrs Chaddha used one of Mr Chaddha’s dosset boxes, rather than her own, for several days. Evidence was given at the inquest that there was no guidance or policy in place for Pharmacists to follow when issuing medication to patients with cognitive impairments, or if there was, it was not well disseminated among the pharmacist population. Evidence was given at the inquest that dosset boxes of different colours or labels with different colours were not routinely given to elderly or cognitively impaired patients living at the same address.
  19. Content Article
    In this report, Carer's UK examine the benefits of moving to paid Carer’s Leave, including the positive impact it would have for women and lower paid workers. They also outline the anticipated costs and savings this would result in for HM Treasury.
  20. Content Article
    The aims of this study were to assess whether delayed admission from the emergency department (ED) influenced mortality risk, length of acute hospital stay, risk of developing delirium and return to domicile for patients presenting with a hip fracture. It found that delayed disposition from the ED was associated with an increased mortality risk and longer length of hospital stay in patients presenting with a hip fracture.
  21. Content Article
    This analysis from Age UK finds that 2 million older people in England are now living with some unmet need for social care. Drawing on the latest available data, the report concludes that England’s health and care services continue to be under enormous pressure so that, despite the best efforts of many dedicated staff, they are currently unable to meet the needs of all the older people presenting who require treatment, care and support.
  22. Content Article
    The original research into sexual violence and assault against older people in NHS hospitals in England, was inspired by a lady called Valerie Kneale. Valerie passed away in Blackpool Victoria Hospital in November 2018, initially thought to be due to a stroke. However, a post-mortem examination found Valerie had in fact died from internal haemorrhaging due to severe vaginal injuries. A member of staff from Blackpool Victoria Hospital was arrested on suspicion of raping Valerie but ultimately was not charged. However, this employee was charged with sexual assault against fellow staff and received a custodial sentence. Despite appeals on BBC Crimewatch and a £20,000 reward for information being offered by CrimeStoppers, no further charges have been made in relation to Mrs Kneale’s death. Since publication of her first paper, the author has presented at several Safeguarding Boards, NHS Trusts, national conferences and university lectures about the issue of sexual violence against older people in the hope of reducing incidents and improving outcomes for victims. The aim of this new paper is to present data for the financial years from 2021-22 to 2023-24 to ascertain if there has been any significant increase or decrease in the number of recorded incidents.
  23. News Article
    More than 1 million older people a year in England are forced to wait longer than 12 hours in A&E, with many having to endure “degrading and dehumanising” corridor waits on trolleys. The number aged 60 and over waiting more than 12 hours to be transferred, admitted or discharged increased to 1.15 million in 2024, up from 991,068 in 2023. The figure was 305,619 in 2019, according to data obtained by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) under freedom of information laws. A report by the RCEM also found the risk of a 12-hour wait in an emergency department in England increased with the age of the patient. People aged 60 to 69 had a 15% chance of waiting 12 hours or more. For those aged 90 and over, the likelihood rose to 33%. “The healthcare system is failing our most vulnerable patients – more than a million last year,” said Dr Adrian Boyle, the president of the RCEM. “These people are our parents, grandparents, great-grandparents. “They aren’t receiving the level of care they need, as they endure the longest stays in our emergency departments, often suffering degrading and dehumanising corridor care. It’s an alarming threat to patient safety. We know long stays are dangerous, especially for those who are elderly, and puts people’s lives at risk.” As well as long waits, the RCEM report found many older people were missing out on vital checks in A&E. Of patients aged over 75, only 16% were screened for delirium – a reversible condition linked to an increased risk of death. Fewer than half (48%) of patients were screened for their risk of falls. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 6 May 2025
  24. News Article
    The health secretary is taking inspiration from Japan in his bid to change how Britons are treated by the NHS. Wes Streeting has said he's interested in the idea of "health MOTs" for Britain's older citizens, evoking how the Asian island nation relies on personalised medical plans for its ageing population. Japan combines genomics and AI machine learning to offer hyper-bespoke programmes for individuals, helping to predict and prevent illnesses before they really take hold. Mr Streeting said such an approach could be a "game-changer" in the UK, as he prepares to publish his 10-year plan for the health service later in 2025. He has repeatedly spoken about his desire to move more of the NHS's work out of hospitals and into local communities, focusing more on preventative care than more expensive and invasive emergency treatment. Read full story Source: Sky News, 19 April 2025
  25. News Article
    Men across the country are, on average, living four fewer years than women – but there are stark disparities across the UK, new analysis shows. Research from the Centre for Ageing Better found from 2021-2023, the average life expectancy at birth is 79 years for men and 83 years for women. The charity’s 2025 State of Ageing report found men living in the bottom fifth of areas of the country in terms of wealth can expect to live 4.4 fewer years on average than those living in the wealthiest areas of England. There is a clear north-south divide in average life expectancy at birth across England, the report found. The lowest life expectancy at birth for men and women is in the North East (77.4 and 81.4 years respectively), according to the Centre for Ageing Better. Dr Carole Easton OBE, Chief Executive at the Centre for Ageing Better, said: “The substantial regional inequalities highlighted in our new State of Ageing report are truly a matter of life and death. Living in a part of the country where good quality jobs and opportunity is scarce, and where financial insecurity and poverty is rife, is robbing people of their health in later life and depriving them of years spent with loved ones. This is the true human cost of our very unequal society. “The really worrying trend is that inequality in life expectancy is increasing almost everywhere. The bombardment of shocks from austerity, Covid and the cost-of-living crisis have compounded longer-term health and inequality issues to ensure we truly are the sick man of Europe.”
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.