Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Clinical administration'.
-
News Article
AI outperforms surgeons in writing post-op reports
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
A study has demonstrated that AI can create more accurate operative reports than surgeons. Published in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons, it is the first report on fully automated, video-based AI surgical documentation. The research highlights the potential of AI-driven solutions to reduce administrative burdens and improve surgical documentation. Surgeons frequently regard the creation of operative reports as essential yet time-consuming. These reports are inevitably subjective and may contain inaccuracies or incomplete information. The administrative task of documentation has also been recognised as a potential factor in physician burnout. Recent advancements in AI, especially in computer vision, have allowed automated systems to accurately detect surgical steps from video footage. Researchers aimed to create a platform that automates the generation of video-based AI surgical operative reports for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Using an AI-powered algorithm, surgical steps were automatically identified in video recordings and mapped to pre-specified text to generate narrative AI operative reports. The accuracy of these AI-generated reports was then compared to traditional surgeon-written reports using an expert review of raw surgical video footage as the gold standard. The findings suggest that AI-driven operative reporting can enhance accuracy, reduce the documentation burden, and improve transparency in surgical procedures. Read full story Source: Surgery News, 24 March 2025 -
News Article
Ten people have died from cancer and up to 10 more have been diagnosed with the disease after a blunder meant they were not invited to NHS screening programmes. Health officials failed to invite more than 5,000 patients in total for routine checks after an IT error affected bowel, breast and cervical cancer screening programmes, as well as abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. In a written ministerial statement on Tuesday, health minister Ashley Dalton said that NHS England had written to those affected this week. The letters were sent to patients who are still eligible for a screening programme, or who were previously eligible for a programme but now exceed its upper age limit. NHS England has also set up a helpline. The mistake occurred when the GP registration process of the patients was “not completed correctly, meaning their details were not passed to NHS screening system”, Dalton said. “Records indicate that up to 10 patients have been diagnosed with a relevant cancer and were not invited for certain screening,” she added. “The impact on these patients is not yet known and a clinical harm assessment process will be undertaken, based on expert clinical advice. “It is with deep sadness that I must report that records also indicate that around 10 people who were not invited for screening may have died from a relevant cancer.” Read full story Source: The Guardian, 11 March 2025 -
Content Article
Most people can agree that how the NHS communicates with people around appointments and ongoing care – whether it is by phone, post, text, app or in person – needs fixing. Getting the basics of admin right – enabling people to book, change or cancel an appointment, and communicating with people about their care in ways that work for them – matters when it comes to people’s experience of using the NHS and judging how well it is working. Even the Prime Minister signalled the problem of poor admin in a speech on the NHS: ‘I am not prepared to see even more of your money spent… on appointment letters, which arrive after the appointment.’ New polling conducted for this long read reveals that 1 in 5 people who used the NHS in the past 12 months received an appointment invitation after the date of the appointment. This day-to-day dysfunction in how the NHS communicates with people has a negative impact on people’s experience of using the NHS and is driving perceptions of an organisation that is wasting money, time and staff resources. This piece was written by the Kings Fund, in partnership with Healthwatch England and National Voices.- Posted
-
- Clinical administration
- Communication
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
NHS England and the government have launched a new ‘red tape challenge’. Their ambition is to make form-filling by GPs more efficient so they can free up time to see patients. But it’s not just GPs who want efficient admin – patients do too. We know that people can struggle to book an appointment or get their test results, and that managing the admin associated with your health can feel like a full-time job. The way the NHS communicates with patients matters. Poor admin can restrict people’s access to care, negatively affect their wellbeing, and undermine trust in the NHS. It can also have a negative impact on staff. Patients who have to move between primary and secondary care (and back again), or have multiple long-term conditions can experience the highest burden when admin is not co-ordinated or designed around their needs. Admin staff also bear the weight of failing admin systems. They are the first point of contact for people trying to navigate a complex and often confusing health and care system. Admin staff are left supporting patients when they can’t get through on the phone or when test results are lost. They often bear the brunt of patient frustration, anxiety, fear – and abuse. Admin staff are in a unique position to make a real difference to how people experience the NHS.- Posted
-
- Clinical administration
- Communication
- (and 3 more)
-
News Article
Families who had babies switched at birth in 1967 in line for NHS compensation
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Families of two babies reportedly switched at birth in an NHS hospital in 1967 are now in line for compensation in the first case of its kind. The baby girls, now grown women named in reports only as Claire and Jessica, were switched at an NHS West Midlands hospital shortly after birth but their families only discovered the mistake 55 years later, according to the BBC. The truth was discovered only after the brother of one of the women, took a DNA test in 2021, which listed another woman as his full sibling. He contacted the woman and it was quickly realised she had been another baby girl born at the same hospital around the same time. It is extremely rare for incidents of babies being switched at birth to occur. A freedom of information request in 2017 revealed there had been no recorded cases of babies being sent home with the wrong family. Since the 1980s, newborns have been given radio frequency identification (RFID) tags immediately after their birth, which allow their location to be tracked. NHS Resolution, which deals with complaints against the NHS, told the BBC the switch was an “appalling error” and that it had accepted legal liability. It told the BBC that it was a “unique and complex case” and that it was still working to agree on the amount of compensation that was due. Read full story Source: The Independent, 4 November 2024- Posted
-
- Baby
- Organisation / service factors
- (and 2 more)
-
Content Article
Research shows that poor handover in hospitals puts patients at risk of severe harm
Anonymous posted an article in Handover
Research undertaken by digital health platform, CAREFUL shows that handover in hospitals is the cause of frequent and severe harm to patients. Handover in hospitals is the cause of frequent and severe harm to patients, according to new research* by digital health platform, CAREFUL. Many patients are suffering because handover is poorly controlled and under-recognised as a source of clinical risk. Handover is the transfer of responsibility and crucial patient information between practitioners and teams. Handover takes place when shifts change and when patients are transferred between departments or outside of the hospital into another care setting. This is a time when staff are under pressure and when mistakes can happen – as the research shows. “We undertook this research because little is known about how practitioners see the risks of handover and the impact of handover on patient safety,” says CAREFUL CEO, Dr DJ Hamblin-Brown. “We anticipated that doctors and nurses would report some errors, but the frequency with which harm is reported across the world is disturbing.” Patient safety in operating theatres has been a recognised problem for many years – ever since the publication of the original checklist article in the New England Journal of Medicine. By contrast, handover, despite being possibly the most common clinical process across healthcare, has not been studied so widely. CAREFUL’s research investigated clinicians’ experience of handover, receiving 432 completed responses from clinicians in 26 countries via an open, anonymous and confidential online questionnaire. Published in February 2022, the findings revealed that errors in handover occur weekly or daily, according to 12% of respondents. Nearly 10% had witnessed severe harm – either death or otherwise life changing – because of handover error. “Handover takes place about 4,000 times each day in a typical teaching hospital”, explains Dr Hamblin-Brown. “It is a procedure prone to a multitude of errors due to reliance on paper that’s easily lost or verbal discussion that’s easily forgotten.” One of the most worrying findings in the research is that most handover takes place using a many different support systems; 35% are still using handwritten notes; 21% are using office documents such as Word and Excel; 10% write on whiteboards and a full 15% are using unofficial messaging apps like WhatsApp. Healthcare leaders reflect the same concerns as staff, but they specifically also want more access to patient information and better electronic systems. Digital platforms may be the only real solution to the challenges surrounding handover, with the ability to provide safe and secure access to handover information at the swipe of a screen that is neither lost nor forgotten. “We work in an industry that is failing to take seriously the dangers of handover. It is arguably the most common, and one of the most important, processes. We harm both staff and patients if we fail to address the dangers of handover,” concludes Dr Hamblin-Brown. *This paper is in pre-print and has not yet been peer-reviewed.- Posted
-
- Handover
- Patient harmed
- (and 12 more)
-
News Article
NHS ‘bed-blocking’ fuelled by 50 steps needed to discharge fit patients
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Hospital staff have to complete 50 separate steps on average to discharge a patient, it has emerged, as the NHS grapples with a bed-blocking crisis. On average, around 14,000 patients deemed fit to leave hospital are stuck in beds every day, according to the latest official figures. The congestion is helping to fuel the backlog in accident and emergency (A&E) departments, where more than 55,000 patients waited 12 hours or longer last month. Steve Barclay, Health Secretary, announced an additional £250 million in funding last week to buy up care beds to help discharge thousands of patients. But doctors, social care experts and families have warned discharges are being delayed by NHS “bureaucracy” and excessive form filling. Dr Matt Kneale, co-chair of the Doctors’ Association UK and a junior doctor in Manchester, said patients are held up by “numerous bottlenecks” before being sent home. “While social care shortages are the predominant issue, smaller factors stack up to create a big problem,” he told The Telegraph. Many hospitals have limits on the times their pharmacies are open, he explained, meaning patients can often be stuck on the ward all day, or an extra night, waiting for their medication. Read full story (paywalled) Source: The Telegraph, 15 January 2023- Posted
-
- Lack of resources
- Discharge
- (and 6 more)
-
Content Article
The NHS is in a state of crisis, with increasingly long delays for ambulances and emergency care. Often people believe that hospital delays and bottlenecks are caused entirely by the difficulty of discharging patients to social care. But there is another factor which is just as much of a problem, and which should be far easier to fix: the masses of unnecessary paperwork doctors and nurses have to fill out every day. Gordon Caldwell explores this issue in an article in the Spectator.- Posted
-
- Organisation / service factors
- Clinical administration
- (and 1 more)
-
Content Article
An artificial intelligence (AI) scribe is a tool that can automate parts of the clinical documentation process for a medical practitioner. AI scribes can convert a conversation with a patient into a clinical note, summary, or letter that can be incorporated into the patient’s health record. AI scribes are also referred to as digital scribes, virtual scribes, ambient AI scribes, AI documentation assistants, and digital/virtual/smart clinical assistants. An AI scribe cannot completely replace the work a general practitioner (GP) undertakes to prepare clinical documentation. The output of an AI scribe must be carefully checked for accuracy by a GP, as it can produce errors and inconsistencies. GPs are ultimately responsible for ensuring that the patient health record is accurate and up-to-date. This article looks at how AI scribes work and the potential benefits and problems with it. -
Content Article
The relentless increase in administrative responsibilities, amplified by electronic health record (EHR) systems, has diverted clinician attention from direct patient care, fuelling burnout. In response, large language models (LLMs) are being adopted to streamline clinical and administrative tasks. Notably, Epic is currently leveraging OpenAI's ChatGPT models, including GPT-4, for electronic messaging via online portals. The volume of patient portal messaging has escalated in the past 5–10 years, and general-purpose LLMs are being deployed to manage this burden. Their use in drafting responses to patient messages is one of the earliest applications of LLMs in EHRs. Previous works have evaluated the quality of LLMs responses to biomedical and clinical knowledge questions; however, the ability of LLMs to improve efficiency and reduce cognitive burden has not been established, and the effect of LLMs on clinical decision making is unknown. To begin to bridge this knowledge gap, the authors of this study, published in the Lancet, carried out a proof-of-concept end-user study assessing the effect and safety of LLM-assisted patient messaging.- Posted
-
- Electronic Health Record
- Digital health
- (and 8 more)
-
News Article
NHS England to investigate why dead people invited for Covid and flu jabs
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
The NHS has launched an investigation after it sent “priority” letters to people who died years ago, in some cases decades, urging them to book flu and Covid-19 jabs to reduce their risk of serious illness. The health service is asking eligible patients to arrange appointments for both vaccines to avoid a potential “twindemic” of flu and coronavirus this winter, which would pile further pressure on hospitals and GP surgeries. “You are a priority for seasonal flu and Covid-19 vaccinations,” the two-page letter tells recipients. “This is because you are aged 65 or over (by 31 March 2024). However, some of the letters, which contain personal information such as NHS numbers, have been sent to people who died years ago. Others have been sent to people who are not eligible for the vaccines, with no connection to the addressee. In a statement, NHS England told the Guardian it was investigating. It declined to answer questions about when the error was first discovered, what had caused it and how many people had been affected. “We have been made aware of some letters sent in error and appreciate this may have been upsetting for those who received it – we are working as quickly as possible to investigate this,” a spokesperson for NHS England said. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 24 October 2023- Posted
-
- Virus
- Vaccination
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
‘Computer error’ removed 1,800 patients from trust’s elective waiting list
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
A trust has discovered 1,800 patients who were removed by mistake from its elective waiting list. Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals Trust chief executive Matthew Trainer wrote to colleagues in the east London health system today to “apologise for the stress this will have caused those experiencing a delay”. Of the 1,800 patients involved, 600 have been waiting more than a year and roughly 200 have been waiting for more than two years. Mr Trainer’s note explained: “The patients have been waiting to see our specialists in routine clinics in gynaecology, neurology, neurosurgery and ophthalmology.” It continued: “As we have been working through our waiting lists, we have discovered a problem with one of them that was used to deal with the backlog created by the pandemic. “It contained routine referrals that were submitted by GPs who wanted their patients to be seen by a specialist, but for whom there were no appointments available due to covid-19. Unfortunately, these patients were removed automatically from this list before they had been seen.” Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 26 April 2022 -
Event
CDIA 2021: Transforming health care
Patient Safety Learning posted an event in Community Calendar
untilBe a part of history and join leading minds to explore clinical documentation's impact on patient safety, financial sustainability, and data integrity, in Australia's inaugural CDI conference. Targeting a broad array of health care stakeholders including CEOs, CFOs, Quality Managers, clinical staff, HIMs, Coders, and Clinical Documentation Specialists in Australia, New Zealand, and the Middle East. The conference will provide invaluable networking opportunities both in person and virtually with industry experts and like-minded individuals. Register- Posted
-
- Documentation
- Clinical administration
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
In this blog for Patient Safety Movement, Pranjal Bora, Head of Product Management at Digital Authority Partners, looks at the ways in which digital technologies improve outcomes and safety in healthcare. The blog examines areas in which digital technologies are currently being used, and looks at the potential future uses of AI and other digital technologies.- Posted
-
- Digital health
- Technology
- (and 4 more)
-
News Article
The NHS has erroneously written to thousands of patients who have had glandular fever in the past asking them to get a flu jab from their GP. The error left some GPs with practice phone lines blocked last week while reception staff have had to explain to patients they are not actually eligible for free flu vaccination. Nearly 40,000 letters were sent out to patients with a past history indicating glandular fever because of a coding error at NHS Digital. This was meant to identify patients with suppressed immune systems which would include those who currently have glandular fever and encourage them to contact their GP practice to arrange vaccination. However, the historical cases were not excluded, leading to the letters being automatically generated even when the glandular fever diagnosis was decades old. When NHS Digital realised the error, it contacted NHS England – which was responsible for posting out the letters – and managed to stop others being sent out. An NHS Digital spokesman said: “During a process to identify patients eligible for a flu vaccination, glandular fever was incorrectly included in a complex list of conditions that cause persistent immunosuppression. This led to some patients incorrectly receiving a letter encouraging them to seek a flu vaccination. “There has been no adverse clinical impact for patients and the issue was quickly resolved before the majority of letters were sent.” NHSD said patients who had received the letter would receive another one to explain and to reassure them." Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 4 November 2020- Posted
-
- Vaccination
- Influenza / pneumonia
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
A technical glitch that meant nearly 16,000 cases of coronavirus went unreported has delayed efforts to trace contacts of people who tested positive. Public Health England (PHE) said 15,841 cases between 25 September and 2 October were left out of the UK daily case figures. They were then added in to reach Saturday's figure of 12,872 new cases and Sunday's 22,961 figure. PHE said all those who tested positive had been informed. But it means others in close contact with them were not. The issue has been resolved, PHE said, with outstanding cases passed on to tracers by 01:00 BST on Saturday. The technical issue also means that the daily case totals reported on the government's coronavirus dashboard over the past week have been lower than the true number. Read full story Source: BBC News, 5 October 2020 -
Content Article
Administrative data systems are used to identify hospital-based patient safety events; few studies evaluate their accuracy. McIsaac assessed the accuracy of a new set of patient safety indicators (designed to identify in hospital complications).- Posted
-
- Surgery - General
- Data
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
New national investigation looks at outpatient appointments after hospital stays
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
The Healthcare and Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) started a new national investigation looking into a safety risk involving outpatient follow-up appointments which are intended but not booked after an inpatient hospital stay. If a patient does not receive their intended follow-up appointment, it could lead to patient harm owing to delayed or absent clinical care and treatment. The investigation was launched after HSIB identified an event where a patient was discharged from hospital on two separate occasions with a plan to follow-up in outpatient clinics. Neither of the outpatient appointments were made. Read full story Source: HSIB, 20 December 2019- Posted
-
- Clinical administration
- Long waiting list
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
Referrals to hospital are increasing as more people continue to live longer with a range of complex conditions. The Professional Records Standards Body (PRSB) recognise that good information sharing is integral to ensuring that patients can receive the ongoing care that they need. Currently there are differences between GP systems and GP practices in the clinical content of referrals, with multiple templates in use. The clinical referral information standard is designed to improve the exchange of referral information from GPs to hospital consultants and other health care professionals providing outpatient services. Working with clinicians and patients, the PRSB have published this standard along with implementation guidance for digital referrals from GPs to hospitals. Once implemented, it will ensure that clinicians have the right information they need to provide the best care for patients. The standard was produced in collaboration with the Royal College of Physicians Health Informatics Unit and input from the Royal College of General Practitioners. By using the standard professionals will have access to all relevant information in a timely manner results in safer and more consistent care for people using health and care services. The information will include data about medication, previous history, allergies and current symptoms, as well as a patient’s concerns and expectations. This standard has now been updated to version 1.1. Detailed release notes are available outlining the changes. These can be found in the supporting documents link above. The standard has been updated in-line with new PRSB digital medications information assurance. The PRSB has worked in partnership with the Health Informatics Unit at the Royal College of Physicians to produce these standards.- Posted
-
- GP
- Primary care
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
A great initiative by East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust to reinforce the importance of basic checks to keep patients from harm when administering medicines.- Posted
-
- Care home staff
- Nurse
- (and 6 more)
-
Content Article
The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) is the only US nonprofit organisation devoted entirely to preventing medication errors. In this short video, produced by ISMP in partnership with the Temple University School of Pharmacy, experts discuss current medication safety concerns and offer practical error prevention recommendations. This issue (episode 3) focuses on: safe administration of concentrated insulin products errors with confusing product labelling educating patients about safe medication practices.- Posted
-
- Pharmacist
- Prescribing
- (and 7 more)
-
Content Article
Failure to be aware of and to follow clinical guidelines and protocols could constitute clinical negligence, but not in all cases, and much will depend on the facts of each case. John Tingle, Lecturer in Law, Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham, discusses aspects of the law on clinical guidelines and other care management tools.- Posted
-
- Legal issue
- Negligence claim
- (and 4 more)
-
Content Article
Hospital command and control centres (CCCs) are central locations within a hospital where staff can coordinate and manage the response to emergencies, disasters and other critical events. They are also often used to track and monitor the location and status of hospital staff and resources, such as beds, equipment and supplies, in order to ensure that they are used efficiently and effectively. This blog by Sukhmeet Panesar, Chief Health Officer at Monstar Labs, acts as an introduction to CCCs in healthcare. It includes information on the different types of CCC, the benefits of CCCs and the challenges they may face. -
News Article
Trust sent domestic abuse victim’s address to ex-partner, says regulator
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
A trust has been reprimanded by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) for exposing a domestic abuse victim to risk by disclosing their address to an ex-partner. University Hospitals Dorset Foundation Trust is one of only seven organisations in the UK – and the only NHS organisation – to have received a reprimand since July 2022 for a data breach involving a victim of domestic abuse. According to new details released by the ICO, University Hospitals Dorset received a reprimand in April this year over a procedure it had in place that, when sending correspondence by letter, would include the full addresses of all recipients of that letter without their consent to do so. In the case that was referred to the ICO, the subject of the data breach had their full address revealed to their ex-partner despite previous allegations of abuse, which has created a “risk of unwanted contact which will remain”. The ICO concluded that, while the subject did not request their address be withheld, it would not be a reasonable expectation that personal information would be shared without prior consent. The report raised concerns that UHD did not have a clear policy in place for managing situations where there are parental disputes and that no formal training was provided to administrative staff for dealing with such circumstances. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 2 October 2023- Posted
-
- Regulatory issue
- Organisation / service factors
- (and 2 more)
-
News Article
A director at a major acute trust said it needs to stop “caving in” to demand pressures by opening extra escalation beds. Board members at Mid and South Essex were discussing a recent report from the Care Quality Commission (CQC), which rated medical services as “inadequate”. The CQC flagged significant staffing shortages and repeated failures to maintain patient records, among other issues. Deputy chair Alan Tobias told yesterday’s public board meeting: “We have just got to hold the line on these [escalation] beds. We never do. Every year we cave in… “We have just got to hold the line with this… Do what some other hospitals do, they shut the doors then. We have never had the bottle to do that.” Barbara Stuttle, another non-executive director, said: “Our staff are exhausted… We don’t have the staff to give the appropriate care to our patients when we have got extra beds. To have extra beds on wards, I know we have had to do it and I know why, [but] you are expecting an already stretched workforce to stretch even further. “And when that happens, something gives. Record keeping, that’s usually the last thing that gets done because they’d much rather give the care to patients.” Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 28 July 2023- Posted
-
- Hospital ward
- Lack of resources
- (and 5 more)