Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Organisational learning'.
Found 540 results
-
Content ArticleLearning from deaths of people in their care can help providers improve the quality of the care they provide to patients and their families, and identify where they could do more. A CQC review in December 2016, 'Learning, candour and accountability: a review of the way trusts review and investigate the deaths of patients in England' found some providers were not giving learning from deaths sufficient priority and so were missing valuable opportunities to identify and make improvements in quality of care. This video from the NHS Improvement national patient safety team is a guide for NHS trusts in England on developing and implementing learning from deaths policies within their organisations.
-
Content ArticlePublished on the Johns Hopkins University website, this commentary from Saralyn Cruickshank focuses on the newly released book Still Not Safe: Patient Safety and the Middle-Managing of American Medicine. Written by Robert Wears and Kathleen Sutcliffe, the book argues that the patient safety movement has evolved but not, in all cases, for the better.
-
Content Article
What is the Advancing Quality Alliance (AQuA)?
Claire Cox posted an article in Improving patient safety
AQuA are an NHS health and care quality improvement organisation at the forefront of transforming the safety and quality of healthcare. They are based in the North West and work with over 70 member organisations. They also undertake a number of consultancy based projects across the UK with both health and care organisations. -
Content ArticleSafety in aviation has often been compared with safety in healthcare. This article, published in JRSM Open, presents a comprehensive review of similarities and differences between aviation and healthcare and the application to healthcare of lessons learned in aviation.
-
Content ArticleRoot cause analysis (RCA) is a recognised yet problematic process for examining failures deeply. The goal of RCAs are to identify systemic problems rather than blame individuals. Effective RCAs devise strategies to improve processes that mitigate conditions that contribute to failure. The RCA2 report is the result of a multidisciplinary consensus effort lead by the US-based National Patient Safety Foundation. The document outlines techniques to enhance the RCA process and enable organisations using the highlighted approaches to improve RCA efforts to more reliably impact improvement.
-
Content ArticleThe National Patient Safety Agency developed the Incident Decision Tree to help NHS managers in the UK to determine a fair and consistent course of action toward staff involved in patient safety incidents. Research shows that systems failures are the root cause of the majority of safety incidents. Despite this, when an adverse incident occurs, the most common response is to suspend the clinician(s) involved, pending investigation, in the belief that this serves the interests of patient safety. The Incident Decision Tree supports the aim of creating an open culture, where employees feel able to report patient safety incidents without undue fear of the consequences. The tool comprises an algorithm with accompanying guidelines and poses a series of structured questions to help managers decide whether suspension is essential or whether alternatives might be feasible.
-
Content Article
EAST: Four simple ways to apply behavioural insights (2015)
Patient Safety Learning posted an article in Techniques
If you want to encourage a behaviour in any setting, make it Easy, Attractive, Social and Timely (EAST). These four simple principles for applying behavioural insights are based on the Behavioural Insights Team’s own work and the wider academic literature. There is a large body of evidence on what influences behaviour, and we do not attempt to reflect all its complexity and nuances here. But we have found that policy makers and practitioners find it useful to have a simple, memorable framework to think about effective behavioural approaches. -
Content ArticleA whole-system approach to nasogastric tubes led by nurses is improving patient safety at Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. This initiative won the patient safety improvement category in the 2018 Nursing Times Awards.
-
Content ArticleIn our Blueprint for Action, we outline some of the concerns around the quality of investigations.
-
Content ArticleThe purpose of the International Classification for Patient Safety (ICPS) is to enable categorisation of patient safety information using standardized sets of concepts with agreed definitions, preferred terms and the relationships between them being based on an explicit domain ontology (e.g., patient safety). The ICPS is designed to be a genuine convergence of international perceptions of the main issues related to patient safety and to facilitate the description, comparison, measurement, monitoring, analysis and interpretation of information to improve patient care. Download visual representation of the framework
-
Content ArticleIn our previous blog we shared some reflections about the recent case of Dr Gawa-Barba and the implications the case has for the promotion of a learning culture in healthcare. In light of the Gawa-Barba case, the Government set up a review to which we have submitted a paper.
-
Content ArticleDrawing together academic evidence and practical experience to produce a framework for safety measurement and monitoring.
-
Content ArticleA powerful account from a daughter on the care her mum and dad received in hospital.
-
Content Article"Among many other opportunities created by the launch of the World Alliance for Patient Safety is the hope that one day the learning from the inadvertent death of a patient in a hospital in one country could save the lives of many others around the world." In his paper, Sir Liam Donaldson (Chair of the WHO World Alliance for Patient Safety at the time) talks about the importance of global collaboration for patient safety.
-
Content ArticleThis Care Quality Commission (CQC) briefing document discusses the need for a change in the way that serious incidents are investigated and managed in the NHS. It is based on the findings of a review of a sample of serious incident investigation reports from 24 acute hospital trusts. This sample represented 15% of the total 159 acute hospital trusts in England at the time of review. The briefing provides a summary of the findings, linked to five opportunities for improvement and calls for all organisations to work together across the system to align expectations and create the right environment for open reporting, learning and improvement.
-
Content Article
Patient Safety: 20 Years After “To Err is Human” (2019)
PatientSafetyLearning Team posted an article in Culture
In this US based eMagazine Patient Safety: 20 Years after ‘To Err is Human,’ sees thought leaders from across the healthcare industry examine how shifting to patient-centred care has helped organisations across the country sustain a deeper culture of patient safety. By implementing strategies such as optimising health IT usability, advocating on behalf of patients and supporting healthcare workers, patient safety continues trending upward, leading to better outcomes. -
Content ArticleAmy Edmondson, PhD, Harvard professor and speaker at Learn Serve Lead 2019: The AAMC Annual Meeting, talks about how to create an interpersonal climate that encourages input from all members of the patient care team.
-
Content ArticleOur experience of attending the Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference and entering our patient safety initiative into the awards.
-
Content ArticleThis toolkit, published by Public Health England, provides an outline of evidence-based antimicrobial stewardship in the secondary healthcare setting. Following this toolkit will help organisations to demonstrate compliance with the Health and Social Care Act 2008: Code of Practice on the prevention and control of infections and related guidance.
-
Content Article
How to do Safety-II, a blog by Steven Shorrock
Claire Cox posted an article in Techniques
The patient safety movement started almost fifteen years ago when it was energised by the release of the Institute of Medicine report “To err is human”. Despite efforts since then to improve quality and safety many believe that little progress has been made in reducing harm caused by errors, accidents and unforeseen occurrences. There is a sense of frustration with current approaches to safety (Safety I) and disappointment that more progress has not been made. Recent developments in safety science, termed Safety II, focus on resilience, adaptive capacity and complexity science and show promise for advancing the safety agenda. -
Content ArticleA report for Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust by Verita. Verita is an independent consultancy that specialises in conducting and managing investigations, reviews and inquiries for regulated organisations.
-
Content ArticleIn 2016, a national review by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) found that the NHS was missing opportunities to learn from patient deaths and that too many families were not being included or listened to when an investigation happened. A key recommendation from this review was that a national framework be developed, so that NHS Trusts have clarity on the actions required when someone dies in their care. The National Guidance on Learning from Deaths published by the National Quality Board (NQB) in March 2017, recommended all Trusts to publish a policy on how the organisation responds to and learns from deaths of patients who die under their management and care. The frameworks purpose is to initiate a standardised approach for reporting, investigating and learning from deaths in care.
-
Content ArticleThis policy confirms the process for reviewing deaths within Lincolnshire Community Health Services (LCHS) to ensure a consistent approach is followed in order to identify if the patient’s needs were met during the end of life phase and that relatives and carers were supported appropriately. The aim of the mortality review process is to identify any areas of practice that require improvement and to identify areas of good practice. This process ensures that mortality within LCHS is managed and reviewed in a systematic way.
-
Content ArticlePresentation from Dr Helen Highham at the 'A New Strategy for Patient Safety - Insight, Involvement, Improvement' conference held in Manchester on the 16 October 2019.
-
Content ArticlePublished in Systematic Reviews, this paper looks at how organisations need to systematically identify contributory factors (or causes) which impact on patient safety in order to effectively learn from error. Investigations of error have tended to focus on taking a reactive approach to learning from error, mainly relying on incident-reporting systems. Existing frameworks which aim to identify latent causes of error rely almost exclusively on evidence from non-healthcare settings. In view of this, the Yorkshire Contributory Factors Framework (YCFF) was developed in the hospital setting. Eighty-five percent of healthcare contacts occur in primary care. As a result, this review will build on the work that produced the YCFF, by examining the empirical evidence that relates to the contributory factors of error within a primary care setting.
