Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Team culture'.
-
Content Article
Patient safety starts with knowing who is in the room
Patient Safety Learning posted an article in Surgery
In operating theatres and other high pressure clinical environments, clear identification shouldn’t be a nice ‘extra’, it is a patient safety need. When staff cannot quickly recognise names and roles, communication becomes harder, escalation can be delayed and patients are left unsure who is caring for them. Reviews of patient safety repeatedly show that poor teamwork and unclear roles can contribute to avoidable harm. Danielle Checketts, Managing Director of Eco Ninjas, discusses why being able to identify staff by their names and roles is so important not only for the staff themselves but also patients. She explains how a simple idea, reusable hats with detachable name badges that can be removed before laundering, can support safety and teamwork. In theatre, everyone can look the same. Masks, gowns, visors and lead aprons often cover name badges, while lanyards are easily hidden or turned around. Theatre teams include surgeons, anaesthetists, students, agency staff and industry representatives, yet patients and colleagues are still expected to know who is who. When names, roles and seniority are unclear, questions may go to the wrong person, and valuable seconds can be lost. Even when introductions are made during the WHO surgical safety checklist,[1] names and roles can quickly be forgotten once a procedure is underway. In an emergency, it must be immediately clear who is who. This lack of clarity can lead to: Miscommunication at critical moments. Delays in escalation. Reduced patient confidence and psychological safety. Errors due to misunderstood roles or instructions. This isn’t just theoretical. Liz Fitzhugh, net zero lead and former theatre manager at University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire (UHCW), put it simply: “If a patient arrests and someone asks for the crash trolley, either everyone goes or no one goes.” In critical moments, teams need to be immediately identifiable so they can act without hesitation. Liz’s team at UHCW were among the first to introduce name and role theatre caps in 2019. It feels fitting that she was also the person who once asked me to write my name on my disposable cap with a marker pen, quietly sparking the idea that grew into this work. For years, poor identification in theatre has become accepted and been treated as normal. But it shouldn’t be. Patients want to know who is caring for them, and staff work more safely when names and roles are clearly visible. That is why the ‘theatre cap challenge’ gained momentum internationally, highlighting a simple idea: if the hat remains visible when wearing sterile attire, it can help make names and roles visible too. Patient perspectives: what matters most Patients consistently say they want to know who is in the room, who is leading their care and who they can turn to for reassurance. Feedback from surgical and maternity care journeys, including caesarean births, shows that visible names and roles help people feel safer, calmer and better able to engage in what is happening around them. Patients describe feeling more reassured when: Staff introduce themselves clearly. Visible names and roles help patients and colleagues remember who is who after introductions, rather than relying on memory alone. There is consistency in communication throughout their care. When identification is unclear, patients can feel anxious and excluded at the point they are most vulnerable. Visible names and roles do more than support courtesy, they strengthen communication, teamwork and reassurance for patients and families. Infection prevention, hygiene and practical constraints Efforts to improve identification must also align with infection prevention standards. Theatre attire cannot simply be adapted without considering contamination risk, laundering processes and the wider pressure to reduce reliance on single use items. The challenge with current approaches The current embroidered theatre caps improve visibility of names and roles, but they are difficult to manage at scale and fail to support consistent identification for all staff. Students, visitors and temporary staff are often excluded, and new starters can wait months before receiving one. They also create ongoing operational challenges, including time-consuming bespoke ordering, poor fit, loss and replacement costs, outdated roles, and complications with laundering. As Alan Dickens, Theatre Manager at MMUH Birmingham, explains: “Bespoke embroidered caps are hard to manage over time. When staff leave or change roles, the hats issued to them often leave with them or need replacing. This creates ongoing cost for the trust and delays in maintaining accurate identification.” Emerging responses across the NHS Several NHS organisations are now testing a more practical approach: reusable hats with detachable name badges that can be removed before laundering. This keeps identification visible while fitting more easily into real hospital systems. In Somerset, a pilot at Musgrove Park showed how a simple change can support safety and teamwork. Mr Andy Stevenson, orthopaedic consultant at Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, said: “In theatre, there can be a really high turnover of colleagues at times, with new people coming and going all the time. This can make it really difficult to know who is who, let alone what jobs they have. Some days, it will be the first time working with half the people in the room. The badge hats have helped to positively transform communication and safety.” A similar message has come from maternity services. Kathryn Harrison, delivery suite manager at Great Western Hospital, said: “Despite staff introducing themselves in the morning, remembering everyone’s name and role throughout the day is challenging, especially when more than 12 people can be in the room at any one time. The badge hats reinforce this critical stage in safe surgery, improve teamwork and communication, and help break down hierarchical barriers. They can be worn by all staff, students, birthing partners and even the patients wear them on our unit”. Building the evidence base There is growing research interest in identification in healthcare.[2][3][4] We have started to work with medical schools on exploring the impact on training environments, role visibility and communication. This is helping to strengthen the evidence base for scalable, system-wide approaches. Students can be included simply using a badge with their name and role alongside a standard fitted hat. Towards integrated, system-based solutions The challenges across current approaches show the need for solutions that fit existing NHS processes, including laundering and distribution, while also identifying temporary staff, visitors and students. The most effective solutions will improve safety without creating new inefficiencies. A call to action Clear identification in healthcare is not optional. It is a practical safety intervention. When people can immediately see names and roles, communication improves, hierarchy softens, patients feel more reassured and teams are better able to act quickly when it matters most. If the NHS is serious about reducing avoidable harm, improving teamwork and strengthening patient experience, visible identification should be part of the solution. Wearing a detachable badge on a reusable theatre cap sounds very simple but this is a small change that can make a very big difference to the safety of patients. References World Health Organization. WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. Kouba LP, Fabi A, Bayer S, et al. Labeled surgical caps improve perioperative patient safety and interprofessional communication in the operating room: a scoping reviewe. Patient Saf Surg, 2026; 20:(9). Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (LUHFT) and Warwick Med. Case study – Switching to Reusable Theatre Caps. NHS England. Douglas N, Demeduik S, Conlan K. Surgical caps displaying team members' names and roles improve effective communication in the operating room: a pilot study. Patient Saf Surg 2021;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s13037-021-00301-w.- Posted
-
- Surgeon
- Operating theatre / recovery
- (and 5 more)
-
Content Article
A review into the role of meal sharing among nursing healthcare teams reveals its potential to enhance team cohesion, facilitate effective communication, alleviate stress, and elevate employee satisfaction in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).- Posted
-
- Food
- Organisational culture
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Event
Clinical huddles, safety briefings and board rounds are now core tools for managing safety, flow and workforce pressures in real time. Done effectively they: give teams a shared picture of risk surface concerns from all staff improve visible leadership, communication and teamwork proactively improve patient safety in real time help prioritise work and escalation turn “soft intelligence” into concrete actions. Done badly, they have the potential to become tick-box rituals that waste time, shut down voices and do not result in improvement or change. This practical masterclass will focus on how to design and lead brief, focused and effective clinical huddles and safety briefings in busy NHS environments. It will explore different types of briefings (start-of-shift, safety huddles, flow huddles, theatre briefs, board rounds and debriefs), and how to make sure they genuinely improve safety, flow and team culture rather than becoming “just another meeting”. The event will also support you to redesign and improve your huddles and briefings for maximum impact. Through expert input, practical examples and focused exercises you will build the skills and confidence to lead briefings that: run to time are well attended involving the whole multidisciplinary team surface concerns from all staff improve patient safety in real time result in clear, trackable actions. Register hub members receive a 20% discount. Email [email protected] for discount code. -
Content Article
In the 11th edition of her newsletter, Judy Walker discusses who should be involved in After Action Reviews.- Posted
-
- After action review
- Team culture
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
Teams-Based Quality Review for Clinical Practice (TBQR) is an innovative training programme designed to equip healthcare professionals with the knowledge and practical skills to lead meaningful safety reviews and organisational learning. Developed in partnership with NHS Education Scotland and the c, the course introduces a structured, evidence-based approach to team learning in clinical practice, building on existing processes such as morbidity and mortality meetings and significant event reviews. Participants will learn how to apply contemporary safety science, including principles of Human Factors and Systems Thinking to analyse clinical work, identify system strengths and vulnerabilities, and translate insights into sustainable improvement. The TBQR course at the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh is open to anyone with an interest in patient safety, governance and medical education, including clinicians, managers, educators and those involved in governance or safety review processes. It provides a unique opportunity to develop the capability to design, lead and implement modern team-based safety reviews, while connecting with a growing international network of professionals committed to advancing patient safety. Through interactive workshops, case discussions and practical frameworks, delegates will gain the confidence and tools needed to embed updated safety science and foster cultures of learning, psychological safety and continuous improvement within their organisations. Please do not hesitate to get in touch if you wish to learn more about this course or have any questions about registration. Contact: [email protected]- Posted
-
- Training
- Team culture
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
Surgical excellence demands teamwork. Poor team behaviours negatively affect team performance and are associated with adverse events and worse outcomes. Interventions to improve surgical teamwork focusing on frontline team members’ nontechnical skills have proliferated but shown mixed results. Literature on teamwork in organisations suggests that team behaviours are also contingent on psychosocial, cultural, and organisational factors. This study examined factors influencing surgical team behaviors to inform more contextually sensitive and effective approaches to optimising surgical teamwork.- Posted
-
- Surgery - General
- Organisational culture
- (and 4 more)
-
Content Article
This paper presents a review and integrative model of how, when, and why the behaviors of one negative group member can have powerful, detrimental influence on teammates and groups. The negative group member is defined as someone who persistently exhibits one or more of the following behaviours: withholding effort from the group, expressing negative affect, or violating important interpersonal norms. The authors then detail how these behaviours elicit psychological states in teammates (e.g. perceptions of inequity, negative feelings, reduced trust), how those psychological states lead to defensive behavioural reactions (e.g. outbursts, mood maintenance, withdrawal), and finally, how these various manifestations of defensiveness influence important group processes and dynamics (e.g. cooperation, creativity). Key mechanisms and moderators are discussed as well as actions that might reduce the impact of the bad apple. Implications for both practice and research are discussed.- Posted
-
- Organisational culture
- Team culture
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
The ability of healthcare staff to raise concerns safely and effectively is a cornerstone of good workforce culture and safe patient care. The extent to which employee voice is heard and acted upon is a good measure of the inclusiveness and psychological safety within teams, particularly whether concerns are raised “in the moment”. In turn, inclusiveness and psychological safety contribute to whether staff feel speaking up is safe and effective. In this review attached, Roger Kline, Research Fellow at Middlesex University Business School, explores the literature on patient safety and speaking up, arguing that staff being able to raise concerns safely and effectively is essential for patient safety, but the NHS continues to struggle with creating a culture where this happens reliably. Despite years of inquiries, policies, and the introduction of Freedom to Speak Up Guardians (FTSUGs), employee silence, fear of detriment and a sense of futility remain widespread. This review was written ahead of the publication of the Dash Review of patient safety across the health and care landscape and the NHS 10 Year Plan but the issues explored will be highly relevant to whether the Review and the Plan achieve their stated aims for quality and safety. Roger has written an accompanying blog discussing the findings of his review: Power and the sound of silence—A blog by Roger Kline- Posted
-
- Speaking up
- Organisational culture
- (and 9 more)
-
Content Article
Six steps to de-implementation: A toolkit for leaders
Alison Bravington posted an article in Quality Improvement
Some healthcare practices, including tasks intended to make care safer, are implemented without any evidence that they are of benefit, and can add an unnecessary burden to the day-to-day work of healthcare staff. This six-step toolkit provides resources to help identify which tasks or processes might be suitable for streamlining, and a step-by-step a guide to developing an evidence-based strategy for safely rethinking, reducing or removing a practice. It has been developed by the Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group at the Bradford Institute for Health Research, UK, through consultation with healthcare professionals and public contributors.- Posted
-
- Leadership
- Organisational culture
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
Advancing patient quality and safety: A scalable framework for transformation
Anonymous posted an article in Improving systems of care
In today’s healthcare landscape, complexity is the norm—but excellence is still the expectation. Advancing Patient Quality and Safety: A Scalable Framework for Transformation offers a bold, practical roadmap for leaders and clinicians ready to move beyond compliance and toward meaningful change. Drawing on decades of frontline experience and system-level leadership, Dr Anhtai H Nguyen presents a field-tested framework that helps organisations identify their purpose, operationalise their values, and build cultures where safety and quality are not episodic—but embedded. This book is for anyone who believes that healthcare can be safer, smarter, and more human. Whether you lead a rural hospital, a large health system, or a clinical team, you’ll find tools, insights, and inspiration to: Align strategy with patient-centred outcomes. Engage frontline teams in continuous improvement. Redesign care delivery with integrity and empathy. Scale what works—without losing what matters. Key messages: Safety is not a department—it’s a mindset. Equity and ethics are foundational to quality. Transformation is scalable across all care settings. Leadership engagement and frontline empowerment are essential. The book offers real-world tools—not just theory. “Quality without equity isn’t quality.” This book is a call to courage, curiosity and collective action.- Posted
- 1 comment
-
- Accountability
- Safety culture
- (and 5 more)
-
Content Article
Royal Society of Medicine: Aware to Care resource pack
Patient Safety Learning posted an article in Staff safety
Psychological safety resource pack for all staff on a wide range of topics, including: Improving team communication and dynamics. Tuning into personal needs and wants and communicating them effectively. Tools to build awareness of current state of mind and behaviour. Moving from reacting to responding. Building and balancing compassion between others and self. Clarifying and committing to values. Optimising self-organisation - Dr Dan Siegel's work. Using the Wheel of Awareness practice to increase mindsight and choice. Regulating the mind/system when stressed. Recourses on sleep Therapy links- Posted
-
- Staff safety
- Psychological safety
- (and 5 more)
-
Content Article
In this podcast episode, hosts Liz Jones and Darren Kilroy from RLDatix speak to Helen Hughes from Patient Safety Learning about how people, technology, and healthcare come together to create great experiences and support patient safety. The Connection: Where Tech Meets Humanity in Healthcare, is a podcast series from RLDatix, which explores the intersection of technology and human-centred care with the health and care sector. Key talking points from the conversation include: the true scope of patient safety why healthcare leaders must prioritise patient safety how to make patient safety everyone's job essential principles for electronic patient record system implementation.- Posted
-
- Organisational culture
- Staff factors
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
All leaders and teams will experience failure at some point – the key is to fail well. In this presentation, Harvard Business School professor Amy Edmondson identifies three types of failure. She explains why some failures aren’t necessarily bad, showing how to turn a failure into a success that will change outlooks and energise teams and teamwork.- Posted
-
- Leadership
- Psychological safety
- (and 4 more)
-
Content Article
The Care Quality Commission’s (CQC) recent national review of maternity services describes how toxic interprofessional cultures are impacting on quality of care. Multiple inquiries have found that poor multidisciplinary teamwork during childbirth causes delays in emergency intervention, as well as birth trauma, with recommended change slow to come. Lord Darzi’s recent report on the wider NHS, which describes the “succession of scandals and subsequent inquiries into maternal care”, suggested that deeper conversations may need to be had on issues such as culture in maternity services. This blog describes some of the professional culture dynamics in maternity services, why it matters when they clash, and suggests how focusing on our shared values can help us move towards resolution. We should not shy away from a problem because it is difficult to solve.- Posted
-
- Maternity
- Organisational culture
- (and 3 more)
-
Community Post
Relational community engagement - webinar
JULES STORR posted a topic in Leadership for patient safety
- Policies
- Organisational culture
- (and 3 more)
An interesting webinar will take place on Tuesday 8 April 1-2pm UK time (2pm - 3:30pm CEST): Humanizing health care through relationality: Exploring the science and practice of community engagement. You can register for the webinar here: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/lXMLhE6MRhiOlrnLKoe8Uw#/registration It’s part of a series being run by WHO and the Global Health Partnerships (GHP) (formerly THET), building on last year’s policy report on this issue launched at the World Innovation Summit for Health (WISH) https://wish.org.qa/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Relationality-in-Community-Engagement.pdf We seem to have been taking in patient safety circles about the criticality of building a culture of safety for my entire career – but achieving this seems ever elusive. This work jumps out as offering something new. I will be writing a blog for PSL on this in the coming weeks.- Posted
- 4 replies
-
1
-
- Policies
- Organisational culture
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
The aim of this study in the journal Pediatrics was to explore the impact of rudeness on the performance of medical teams. Twenty-four NICU teams participated in a training simulation involving a preterm infant whose condition acutely deteriorated due to necrotizing enterocolitis. Participants were informed that a foreign expert on team reflexivity in medicine would observe them. Teams were randomly assigned to either exposure to rudeness (in which the expert’s comments included mildly rude statements completely unrelated to the teams’ performance) or control (neutral comments). The videotaped simulation sessions were evaluated by three independent judges (blinded to team exposure) who used structured questionnaires to assess team performance, information-sharing and help-seeking. The authors concluded that rudeness had adverse consequences on the diagnostic and procedural performance of NICU team members. Information-sharing mediated the adverse effect of rudeness on diagnostic performance, and help-seeking mediated the effect of rudeness on procedural performance.- Posted
-
- Team culture
- Civility
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
According to the last AHPRA Medical Training Survey, a third of doctors in training in the USA had experienced or witnessed bullying, harassment or discrimination in the workplace. The person responsible was usually a colleague and concerningly, only a third of those who witnessed or experienced this behaviour reported it. In this article, Josh Inglis explains why we can’t continue to overlook unprofessional behaviour in our workplace, because doing so is causing harm to ourselves, our patients and the profession, and what we can do about it.- Posted
-
- Leadership
- Organisational culture
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
The aim of the study was to explore the factors that affect the safety attitude and teamwork climate of Cyprus maternity units and Cypriot midwives. The study found that the safety climate in the maternity settings was negative across all six safety climate domains examined. The higher mean total score on team work and safety climate in the more experienced group of midwives is a predominant finding for the maternity units of Cyprus. It could be suggested that younger midwives need more support and teamwork practice, in a friendly environment, to enhance the safety and teamwork climate through experience and self-confidence. -
Content Article
There are signs that some US healthcare organisations are scoring some successes in addressing the worker morale and retention crisis. But data from Press Ganey surveys shows that there is a widening gap between the most- and least-successful organisations. This article draws lessons from the former. It discusses three key elements needed to engage workers, make them more resilient, and make them feel more aligned with their leaders.- Posted
-
- Organisational culture
- Team culture
- (and 5 more)
-
Content Article
This blog (attached below) explores how far the nature of our relationships at work have an impact on patient safety. Lesley Parkinson – the executive director of Restorative Thinking, a social enterprise working to introduce and embed restorative and relational practice in the NHS and across public sector organisations – explores how six restorative practice habits add value in multiple teams and scenarios. You can also order Lesley's book Restorative Practice at Work Six habits for improving relationships in healthcare settings.- Posted
-
- Restorative Justice
- Safety culture
- (and 4 more)
-
Content Article
Gaslighting at work can take many forms and is often subtle, causing the victim to question their perception. This blog gives some examples of gaslighting at work and suggests ways to deal with it if you believe you are experiencing gaslighting from a colleague.- Posted
-
- Gaslighting
- Bullying
- (and 4 more)
-
Content Article
A substantial barrier to progress in patient safety is a dysfunctional culture rooted in widespread disrespect. Leape et al. identify a broad range of disrespectful conduct, suggesting six categories for classifying disrespectful behaviour in the health care setting: disruptive behaviour; humiliating, demeaning treatment of nurses, residents, and students; passive-aggressive behaviour; passive disrespect; dismissive treatment of patients; and systemic disrespect. At one end of the spectrum, a single disruptive physician can poison the atmosphere of an entire unit. More common are everyday humiliations of nurses and physicians in training, as well as passive resistance to collaboration and change. Even more common are lesser degrees of disrespectful conduct toward patients that are taken for granted and not recognised by health workers as disrespectful. Disrespect is a threat to patient safety because it inhibits collegiality and cooperation essential to teamwork, cuts off communication, undermines morale, and inhibits compliance with and implementation of new practices. Nurses and students are particularly at risk, but disrespectful treatment is also devastating for patients. Disrespect underlies the tensions and dissatisfactions that diminish joy and fulfilment in work for all health care workers and contributes to turnover of highly qualified staff. Disrespectful behaviour is rooted, in part, in characteristics of the individual, such as insecurity or aggressiveness, but it is also learned, tolerated, and reinforced in the hierarchical hospital culture. A major contributor to disrespectful behaviour is the stressful health care environment, particularly the presence of “production pressure,” such as the requirement to see a high volume of patients. -
Content Article
Incivility in the workplace, school and political system in the United States has permeated mass and social media in recent years and has also been recognized as a detrimental factor in medical education. This scoping review in BMC Medical Education identified research on incivility involving medical students, residents, fellows and faculty in North America to describe multiple aspects of incivility in medical education settings published since 2000. The results of the review highlight that incivility is likely to be under-reported across the continuum of medical education and also confirmed incidences of incivility involving nursing personnel and patients that haven't been emphasised in previous reviews. -
Content Article
In this interview, Derek Feeley, IHI President Emeritus and Senior Fellow shares the work of the Health Improvement Alliance Europe (HIAE) workgroup related to curiosity. He outlines five simple rules linked to complexity theory, which states that if you are trying to make sense of a complex situation, you should create simple, order-generating rules. The five simple rules are: Ask rather than tell. Listen to understand rather than to respond. Hear every voice rather than only those easiest to hear. Prioritise problem framing rather than problem solving. Treat vulnerability as a strength rather than a weakness.- Posted
-
- Leadership
- Communication
- (and 5 more)
-
Content Article
This infographic by artist Sonia Sparkles was produced for Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust to outline what patients can expect from healthcare staff when attending an appointment at or staying in hospital. It covers navigating he hospital, what to expect from an appointment and standards for staff attitudes. A wide range of graphics relating to patient safety, healthcare and quality improvement is available on the Sonia Sparkles website.- Posted
-
- Team culture
- Communication
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with: