Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Information sharing'.
Found 323 results
-
Content Article
Visiting the Intensive Care Unit: activity book for children
Claire Cox posted an article in Patient-centred care
'Visiting the Intensive Care Unit' is an activity book for children who are visiting a relative in an intensive care unit (ICU). This resource is free to NHS hospitals. -
News Article
The cost of patient safety inaction: Why doing more of the same is unsustainable
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
On January 2020, Patient Safety will be on the G20 agenda (among other five health key priorities), but Abdulelah M. Alhawsawi, Saudi Patient Safety Center, asks "what is patient safety doing on an economic forum like the G20?" Patient harm is estimated to be the 14th leading cause of the global disease burden. This is comparable to medical conditions such as tuberculosis and malaria. In both US and Canada, patient safety adverse events represent the 3rd leading cause of death, preceded only by cancer and heart disease. In the US alone, 440,000 patients die annually from healthcare associated infections. In Canada, there are more than 28,000 deaths a year due to patient safety adverse events. In low-middle income countries, 134 million adverse events take place every year, resulting in 2.6 million deaths annually. In addition to lives lost and harm inflicted, unsafe medical practice results in money loss. Nearly, 15 % of the health expenditure across Organization of Economic Cooperative Development countries is attributed to patient safety failures each year, but if we add the indirect and opportunity cost (economic and social), the cost of harm could amount to trillions of dollars globally. When a patient is harmed, the country loses twice. The individual will be lost as a revenue generating source for society and the individual will become a burden on the healthcare system because he or she will require more treatment. Unless we do something different about patient safety, we would risk the sustainability of healthcare systems and the overall economies. Alhawsaw proposed establishing a G20 Patient Safety Network (Group) that will combine Safety experts from healthcare and other leading industries (like aviation, nuclear, oil and gas, other), and economy and fFinancial experts This will function as a platform to prioritise and come up with innovative patient safety solutions to solve global challenges while highlighting the return on investment (ROI) aspects. This multidisciplinary group of experts can work with each state that adopts the addressed global challenge to ensure correct implementation of proposed solution. Read full story Source: The G20 Health & Development Partnersip, 10 February 2020- Posted
- 1 comment
-
1
-
- (and 1 more)
-
Content ArticleThis article by Abdulelah M. Alhawsawi, from the Saudi Patient Safety Center, first appeared on the G20 Health & Development Partnership news stream. It is copied below verbatim.
- Posted
- 8 comments
-
2
-
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
NHS Mid and South Essex's 'We're Listening' leaflet
Danielle Haupt posted an article in Keeping patients safe
Danielle, Critical Care Outreach Nurse at Southend University Hospital, share's her 'We're Listening' leaflet as part of the trust's Call for Concern service. This leaflet will be displayed in all hospital areas. This service has been developed so that patients, friends and family can alert the Critical Care Outreach team if they have concerns that need listening to and gives a telephone number to call and outlines the next steps. -
Content ArticleThis study covers the world outlook for patient engagement solutions across more than 190 countries. For each year reported, estimates are given for the latent demand, or potential industry earnings (P.I.E.), for the country in question (in millions of U.S. dollars), the percent share the country is of the region, and of the globe. These comparative benchmarks allow the reader to quickly gauge a country vis-à-vis others.
-
Content ArticleProfessor Anne-Sophie Darlington speaks to ecancer at the 2019 EORTC Groups Annual Meeting (EGAM) about the importance of including the patient's experiences and voice during clinical trial assessments. Professor Darlington details the use of questionnaires to measure these patient parameters and how these must be carefully developed to allow flexibility to withstand the evolving environment of clinical trial research.
-
Community PostCan any one share? The trust I work in delivers patient safety training as part of the mandatory training. I was wondering if any other trust does this, if so would they mind sharing Thier slides as I'm not sure what it should include. Thanks!
-
Content Article
Consent to treatment: Overview
Claire Cox posted an article in Consent issues
Consent to treatment means a person must give permission before they receive any type of medical treatment, test or examination. This must be done on the basis of an explanation by a clinician. Consent from a patient is needed regardless of the procedure, whether it's a physical examination, organ donation or something else. The principle of consent is an important part of medical ethics and international human rights law. -
News Article
JAMA editorial blasts FDA's reporting of medical device problems
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) needs to do more to quickly and substantially reform its system for reporting adverse events caused by medical devices, two researchers wrote in an Editorial published in JAMA Internal Medicine. The editorial notes several instances where information on a medical device was withheld from the public or not reported fully. The current adverse events reporting system relies on device makers to voluntarily report adverse events, which the authors say does not place patient safety as a priority. The editorial specifically highlights a study involving Medtronic's Insync III model 8042 heart failure pacemaker, which the authors said caused a "high burden of serious adverse events (including death)." The authors said it took the FDA 19 months to recall the device after the first instance of the device failing was reported. The FDA also decided to classify the recall as Class II, which signifies a low probability of serious adverse events. "This long unexplained delay before the recall and the inappropriate recall classification raise concerns about patient harms that could have been prevented by speedier and stronger regulatory actions," the authors wrote. Read full story Source: Becker's Hospital Review, 10 January 2020 -
Content Article
Patient education and information: difficult airway
Claire Cox posted an article in Keeping patients safe
The Difficult Airway Society (DAS) is a UK based medical specialist society formed to enhance and promote safe airway management of patients by anaesthetists and other healthcare practitioners. DAS is actively involved in training healthcare professionals in the safe and competent practice of advanced airway management. DAS has produced guidelines for airway management of patient undergoing anaesthetic. These guidelines are highly valued and widely followed not only in the UK but also worldwide. With nearly 3000 members (most of whom are anaesthetists based in UK and worldwide ) DAS is also the largest specialist society in the UK. The links below lead you to patient information leaflets produced by DAS about how anaesthetist manage your airway (breathing passage) during an anaesthetic. -
Content ArticleThe Accessible Information Standard directs and defines a specific, consistent approach to identifying, recording, flagging, sharing and meeting individuals’ information and communication support needs by NHS and adult social care service providers.
-
Content Article
Airway alert card and difficult airway database
Claire Cox posted an article in Process improvement
The Difficult Airway Society (DAS) has produced a difficult airway card for patients to carry in their wallet. This is to alert the anaesthetist that this patient has a 'difficult airway' before they find out the hard way. This website also holds the database for patients with difficult airways. This is for clinicians to use to help assess risk in patients undergoing sedation or general anaesthetic. -
Content Article
Why do we need to talk about patient data?
Claire Cox posted an article in Actions in response to data
This short video, by Understanding Patient Data, shows people talking about why it's important to use patient data, and why we need to better explain the benefits and safeguards. -
Content ArticleOn 10 May 2017, the RCP (Royal College of Physicians) hosted ‘Learning from mortality reviews to improve patient safety’ as part of it's Keeping patients safe seminar series. The event discussed how the National Mortality Case Record Review (NMCRR) can improve care and keep patients safe. As well as hearing from the RCP's National Mortality Case Record Review (NMCRR) team about their work and the results of the programme's pilot phase, the seminar was an opportunity to hear about the wide-ranging work the RCP is undertaking to support improvements in patient safety.
-
Content ArticleThe Professioan Records Standards Body are a unique collaboration of groups representing those who receive and provide health and social care across the UK, as well as those providing the IT systems that support care. Emma Robertson is the patient lead on the Professional Records Standards Body (PRSB), work to accredit apps and digital health technologies. She speaks to PRSB about why she got involved with the work and the benefits and challenges of using apps to support health and care.
-
News Article
Revealed: Dozens of hospitals ignoring NHS safety warnings
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Dozens of hospital trusts have failed to act on alerts warning that patients could be harmed on its wards, The Independent newspaper has revealed. Almost 50 NHS hospitals have missed key deadlines to make changes to keep patients safe – and now could face legal action. One hospital, Birmingham Women’s and Children’s Foundation Trust, has an alert that is more than five years past its deadline date and has still not been resolved. Now the Care Quality Commission (CQC) has warned it will be inspecting hospitals for their compliance with safety alerts and could take action against hospitals ignoring the deadlines. National bodies issue safety alerts to hospitals after patient deaths and serious incidents where a solution has been identified and action needs to be taken. Despite the system operating for almost 20 years, the NHS continues to see patient deaths and injuries from known and avoidable mistakes. NHS national director for safety Aidan Fowler has reorganised the system to send out fewer and simpler alerts with clear actions hospitals need to take, overseen by a new national committee. Last year the CQC made a recommendation to streamline and standardise safety alerts after it investigated why lessons were not being learnt. Professor Ted Baker, Chief Inspector of hospitals, said: “CQC fully supports the recent introduction of the new national patient safety alerts and we have committed to looking closely at how NHS trusts are implementing these safety alerts as part of our monitoring and inspection activity.” He stressed: “Failure to take the actions required under these alerts could lead to CQC taking regulatory action.” Read full story Source: The Independent, 30 December 2019 -
Content Article
Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch: Annual Review 2018/19
Claire Cox posted an article in HSSIB investigations
The Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) conducts independent investigations into patient safety concerns in NHS-funded care across England. Formed in April 2017, they are funded by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and hosted by NHS Improvement , but operate independently. -
Content ArticleThis American article looks at a patient safety communication strategy called 'teach-back', outlined by a Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) guide. During patient teach-back, providers explain patient medical conditions, treatment options, or self-care instructions to patients. They then ask patients to repeat the information back to them in their own words. The goal of teach-back is to ensure that you have explained medical information clearly so that patients and their families understand what you communicated to them,” the AHRQ guide explains. “This low-cost, low-technology intervention can be the gateway to better communication, better understanding, and ultimately shared decision-making.”
-
Content ArticleUsing the data obtained from Fifth Sense’s ‘Quality of Life Impact of Olfactory Disorders’ survey amongst its members, a research paper was produced by Mr Carl Philpott and Duncan Boak to demonstrate the impact that olfactory disorders have on people’s lives. A summary of the findings can be read here. The study found it impacted on people's emotional wellbeing and their mental health, with many patients feeling their voice was unheard. There is a need for medical practitioners to take olfactory disorders more seriously.
-
Content ArticleHealthcare is in the midst of significant change, with substantial shifts in emphasis and priorities. Patient-centered care has become central to the core goals of better health, better quality, and lower costs while highlighting the necessity of incorporating patients’ efforts, needs, and perspectives into healthcare at all levels. Patient and family engagement (PFE) is critical to patient-centered care, and important theoretical and empirical work has identified key elements and implications of PFE, especially for management of chronic illnesses and preference-sensitive clinical decision making. Brown et al. believe that the ultimate goal of active, mutually respectful partnership among clinicians and patients/families is urgent and important. However, consistent terminology and definitions of PFE are still lacking. This deficit is particularly striking in intensive care units (ICUs), which pose special challenges to outpatient models of PFE: the emotional stakes are high, time is greatly compressed, surrogates play a central role, and the specter of death often dominates decision making.
-
Content ArticlePatients who are actively involved in their health and health care tend to have better outcomes and care experiences and, in some cases, lower costs. Implementing patient and family engagement strategies has led to fewer hospital-acquired infections, reduced medical errors, reduced serious safety events, and increased patient satisfaction scores. After reviewing best practices and evidence-based strategies for increasing patient and family engagement in direct care settings, hospitals, health systems, the community, and through policy, the Task Force on Patient and Family Engagement developed and refined a set of 16 recommendations that will catalyse patient and family engagement and improve health and health care systems in North Carolina.
-
Community Post
Models of good practice for patient engagement in patient safety
HelenH posted a topic in How to engage for patient safety
- (and 3 more)
We know from academic research that patient engagement reduces the risk of unsafe care and harm, in patients own care and improving safety for all. Some organisations are investing time (if not money!) in recruiting, training and supporting patient leaders to work with Executives and senior staff, sharing their experience and as they engage with staff and patients, report back what they see. The model in Berkshire, as shared with me by Douglas Findlay, patient leader, is that they don’t make decisions on what needs to change and how, but report back what they see for others to learn and act. Do we know of other models of good practice? What can we learn and share from them?- Posted
- 29 replies
-
2
-
- (and 3 more)
-
Content ArticleIn September 2018, we held our first Patient Safety conference at the King’s Fund in London. Over 100 healthcare leaders, clinicians, patient safety experts, politicians and patients and families attended from across the UK to listen to a packed and varied programme of leading experts in patient safety.
