Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Investigation'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning campaigns
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • Patient Safety Standards
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
    • Data and insight
    • Research
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


First name


Last name


Country


Join a private group (if appropriate)


About me


Organisation


Role

Found 1,563 results
  1. Content Article
    AcciMap graphically maps the multiple contributing factors to an accident and their inter-relationships onto the following six levels: Government policy and budgeting. Regulatory bodies and associations. Local health economy planning and budgeting (including hospital management). Technical and operational management. Events, processes and conditions. Outcomes.
  2. Content Article
    The Queen’s Speech was debated on Tuesday 17 May 2022. Copied below is Baroness Julia Cumberlege's excerpts on fulfilling the recommendations of the Cumberlege Report for a redress scheme.
  3. Content Article
    ‘Neo’ is an Allied Health Professional working on the frontline and asks what being open and transparent actually means and whether publishing a report or an investigation is just another tick box exercise if lessons aren't learned.
  4. Content Article
    This study aims to present two system models widely used in Human Factors and Ergonomics (HF/E) and evaluate whether the models are adoptable to England’s national patient safety team in improving the exploration and understanding of multiple incident reports of an active patient safety issue and the development of the remedial actions for a potential National Patient Safety Alert. The existing process of examining multiple incidents is based on inductive thematic analysis and forming the remedial actions is based on barrier analysis of intelligence on potential solutions. However, no formal systems models evaluated in this study have been used. AcciMap and Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) were selected, applied and evaluated to the analysis of two different sets of patient safety incidents: (i) incidents concerning ingestion of superabsorbent polymer granules and (ii) incidents concerning the interruption in use of High Nasal Flow Oxygen.
  5. Content Article
    In this webinar, MISHC Research Fellow Philippa Dodshon analyses research into practitioners’ experiences with incident investigation to determine how they can be used to enhance organisational learning and reduce the prospect of repeat accidents.
  6. Content Article
    This is part of our new series of Patient Safety Spotlight interviews, where we talk to people about their role and what motivates them to make health and social care safer. Lou worked in family liaison for the police service for thirty years, and she talks to us about how this experience is helping her develop family engagement services at the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB). She describes the importance of valuing the voices of patients and their families, and the vital role of their input in improving safety in the healthcare system. She also talks about the challenges the Covid-19 pandemic posed to HSIB's family engagement work, and how speaking to patients and their families is being increasingly valued and professionalised by the healthcare system.
  7. Content Article
    The Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Review was prompted by public and political concern following reports of the deaths of three patients between December 2018 and February 2019. The deaths had been linked to rare microorganisms and concern was growing that these organisms were in turn linked to the built environment at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH) and Royal Hospital for Children (RHC). The Review's remit was: “To establish whether the design, build, commissioning and maintenance of the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital and Royal Hospital for Children has had an adverse impact on the risk of Healthcare Associated Infection and whether there is wider learning for NHS Scotland”.
  8. Content Article
    Maternity services shouldn’t be waiting for whistle-blowers or inquiries to alert them to problems, says Dr Mark Ratnarajah, a practising paediatrician and managing director of C2-Ai. Instead systematic transdisciplinary reviews and real-time data should support a culture of shared learning, that helps ensure patient safety is everybody’s responsibility.
  9. Content Article
    An investigation started on 9 October 2020 into the death of Matthew Alexander Caseby. Following his admission and subsequent absconsion from the Priory Hospital in Edgbaston, Matthew stepped in front of a train on the 8 September 2020 and was fatally injured. At the time, Matthew was suffering from disorder thinking and did not have the capacity to form any intention to end his life. Matthew absconded from Beech ward over a fence in the courtyard area and at the time of his absconsion Matthew was unattended. It was inappropriate for Matthew to be left unattended in the courtyard. There were concerns regarding Matthew absconding but the recording processes on Beech ward were inadequate which resulted in the communication to staff involved in Matthew's care being lacking. As a result of risks not being fully recorded, Matthew's risk assessment was not adequate as it was not based on all of the available information. Overall, the inadequate risk assessment for Matthew, the inadequate documentation records, the lack of a risk assessment for the courtyard area and the absence of a policy regarding observations levels in the courtyard means that the courtyard was not safe for Matthew to use unattended. His death was contributed to by neglect on the part of the treating hospital.
  10. Content Article
    The purposes of the Canadian Medication Incident Reporting and Prevention System (CMIRPS) programme are to:Coordinate the capture, analysis and dissemination of information on medication incidents;Enhance the safety of the medication use system for Canadians.Support the effective use of resources through the reduction of potential or actual harm caused by preventable medication incidents.The goals of the CMIRPS information system are to:Collect data on medication incidents.Facilitate the implementation of reporting of medication incidents.Facilitate the development and dissemination of timely, targeted information designed to reduce the risk of medication incidents (e.g. ISMP Canada Safety Bulletins).Facilitate the development and dissemination of information on best practices in safe medication use systems.
  11. Content Article
    This blog by global law firm Clyde & Co describes the background to the new Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) and how it will change the way that NHS services will investigate patient safety incidents. The authors offer an overview of the framework, its implementation and who it affects.
  12. Content Article
    From April 2023 the new Health Services Safety Investigations Body will require doctors to be candid about errors that have led to patient harm. But can medics trust that material given in this “safe space” won’t be used against them?
  13. Content Article
    The Piper Alpha exploded and sank on 6 July 1988, killing 165 of the men on board. Some of the lessons learned from the inquiry into the Piper Alpha Disaster could be applied to healthcare.
  14. Content Article
    Serious incident (SI) investigations aim to identify factors that caused or could have caused serious patient harm. This study from Mary Dixon-Woods and colleagues aimed to use the Human Factors Analysis Classification System (HFACS) to characterise the contributory factors identified in SI investigation reports.
  15. Content Article
    Investigations of healthcare harm often overlook the valuable insights of patients and families. This review from Lauren et al. aimed to explore the perspectives of key stakeholders when patients and families were involved in serious incident investigations.
  16. Content Article
    Unsafe maternity care has cost the National Health Service in England (NHS) £8.2bn in 15 years. How many more surveys of women’s experiences, reports of poor quality care and failings of senior management at NHS maternity units do we need to know that there is still a massive problem with maternity services in England? Judy Shakespeare, Elizabeth Duff and Debra Bick discuss why a joined-up policy and investment in maternity services is urgently needed.
  17. Content Article
    This document outlines the terms of reference for the independent review into maternity services at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (NUH), commissioned by NHS England and led by Donna Ockenden. The review has been established in light of significant concerns raised about the quality and safety of maternity services at NUH, and concerns voiced by local families. It replaces a previous regionally-led review after some families expressed concerns and made representations to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. The review began on 1 September 2022 following early engagement with families and NUH from June 2022. It is expected to last 18 months, although this timeframe is subject to review. Learning and recommendations will be shared with NUH as they become apparent, to allow rapid action to improve the safety of maternity care. The only and final report is expected to be published and presented to NUH and NHS England around March 2024.
  18. Content Article
    In this blog, Ian Lavery, Senior Investigation Science Educator at the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) summarises a presentation given to HSIB staff by healthcare improvement expert Professor Mary Dixon-Woods. The presentation highlighted that a recommendation alone could fall short of the intended impact on the healthcare system. It looked at creating recommendations to respond to real world working, the importance of involving people most affected by patient safety incidents and why it's vital to look at when things go right.
  19. Content Article
    The Patients Association was formed over fifty years ago. Since then, it has listened to patients concerns and spoken out on their behalf. Not long after the Patients Association took up its role, legislation was enacted by the government to establish the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO). Both organisations have similar values and agendas, intended to help and support the public, the difference being, one is an independent charity, the other a government body afforded all the power and legislation to act with credibility. However, sadly the Patients Association has no confidence that the PHSO will carry out an independent, fair, open, honest and robust investigation. The Ombudsman is frequently quoted as saying patients who suffer harm or poor care in hospitals are failed by a “toxic cocktail” within the health service, whereby complaints go unheard and lessons unlearned. The Ombudsman states: ”We are the last resort for complaints about the NHS. We listen to individual complaints and where things have gone wrong, help to get them put right.” The Patients Association, in partnership with the families of those who have contributed to this report, challenge that statement. Nearly 50 years after the PHSO was established, it is time for real and robust change, not just promises and more recommendations. The Patients Association have a clear request to the Government and Public Administration Select Committee-read our patients stories, listen to their concerns, consider our conclusions, recommendations and finally, hold the PHSO to account for its action.
  20. Content Article
    Medical litigation claim and costs in UK are rising. This study from Lane, Bhome and Somani analysed the 10-year trend in litigation costs for individual clinical specialties in the UK from 2009/10 to 2018/19.The authors concluded that addressing the issue of litigations is complex. Medically there are speciality specific issues that require attention, whilst some general measures are common to all: effective communication, setting realistic targets and maintaining a motivated, adequately staffed workforce. These, alongside legal reforms, may reduce the financial burden of increasing litigation on the NHS.
  21. Content Article
    On 3 September 2021 assistant coroner Jonathan Stevens commenced an investigation into the death of Martha Mills, aged 13 years. Martha sustained a handlebar injury whilst cycling on a family holiday in Wales. She was transferred to King’s College Hospital London and died approximately one month later. Her medical cause of death was: 1a refractory shock 1b sepsis 1c pancreatic transection (operated) 1d abdominal trauma.
  22. Content Article
    In this blog, consultant on workforce culture Roger Kline looks at the case of Shyam Kumar, an orthopaedic consultant who was seconded as an inspector for the Care Quality Commission (CQC). After raising concerns about patient safety, harm, cover up and bullying of staff with the CQC, his secondment with them was terminated. An Employment Tribunal has found that Mr Kumar's concerns were well-founded and that he was then victimised for raising them by the CQC. The Tribunal accepted his claims that he was removed from his secondment as a CQC inspector as a result of making protected disclosures, accepted his evidence, and at a number of points did not believe the evidence provided by senior CQC staff. The blog raises the question of whether the CQC would fail on its own criteria for being a 'well led' organisation on the basis of this case. It also questions whether the CQC can credibly hold NHS organisations to account on whistleblowing after its response to having concerns raised by Mr Kumar, one of its own inspectors. The author asserts that "the CQC needs to urgently demonstrate it will apply accountability to its own decision making, and lack of support for those raising concerns, and hold its own senior leaders (up to the CEO) to account for decisions which are contrary to its own published standards."
  23. Content Article
    This letter accompanies the publication of the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) by NHS England. The PSIRF forms a major part of the NHS Patient Safety Strategy and replaces the Serious Incident Framework (SIF) that has been in place since 2015. It aims to improve safety management across the healthcare system in England and to support the NHS to embed the key principles of a patient safety culture. In his letter, Dr Aiden Fowler, National Director of Patient Safety in England outlines how PSIRF was developed, describes how the transition from the SIF to PSIRF will take place and highlights the tools available to support organisations to implement the changes. The letter is addressed to: NHS trust and foundation trust chief executives, medical directors and nursing directors Integrated Care Board medical directors and nursing directors NHS England Regional Team medical directors and nursing directors NHS England regional direct commissioning leads
  24. Content Article
    This document sets out the Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman's (PHSO) strategy 2022-25 and outlines its vision to be a voice for improvement in public services, providing an independent, impartial and fair complaints handling service. The document describes how PHSO will achieve its three strategic objectives: People who use public services have a better awareness of the role of the Ombudsman and can easily access our service People we work with receive a high quality, empathetic and timely service, according to international Ombudsman principles We contribute to a culture of learning and continuous improvement, leading to high standards in public service
  25. Content Article
    The General Medical Council (GMC) is the UK's statutory body responsible for taking action to prevent a doctor from putting the safety and confidence of patients at risk. In this blog for The Spectator, doctor Max Pemberton argues that the GMC has lost the trust of doctors by bringing a series of inappropriate cases, resulting in the British Medical Association (BMA) calling for an overhaul of how the GMC is run. He describes some recent investigations as being about 'petty' issues and highlights the significant impact being under investigation can have on doctors' mental health.
×
×
  • Create New...