Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Investigation'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning campaigns
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • Patient Safety Standards
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
    • Data and insight
    • Research
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Categories

  • Files

Calendars

  • Community Calendar

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


First name


Last name


Country


Join a private group (if appropriate)


About me


Organisation


Role

Found 1,559 results
  1. Content Article
    This investigation by the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) aims to improve patient safety by supporting staff to access critical information about patients at their bedsides in emergency situations. It defines critical information as ‘information about patients that needs to be accessed rapidly and accurately to ensure correct care is delivered when it is required’. In this investigation, critical information was considered through a focus on patient identifiers (such as name and date of birth) and decisions relating to whether someone is recommended to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) if their heart stops (cardiac arrest). The reference event for this investigation was the care of a patient in a hospital who was found unresponsive in bed. A short time later, he stopped breathing and his heart stopped. Help was immediately sought from the ward staff and a team gathered around the patient’s bed, where they confirmed the patient’s identity and noted that a decision had been made that he was not recommended to receive CPR if his heart stopped. As a result, CPR was not started. Around 10 minutes later, a nurse who had previously been caring for the patient returned from their break and recognised that the patient had been misidentified as the patient in the next bed. The patient whose heart had stopped was recommended to receive CPR. CPR was immediately started, but despite this, the patient died.
  2. Content Article
    This is a brief summary of a Westminster Hall debate in the House of Commons on the 31 January 2023 concerning the Essex Mental Health Independent Inquiry.
  3. Content Article
    This poster produced by researchers at Warwick Medical School summarises a qualitative research project that examined attitudes and behaviours related to patient safety culture at a single West Midlands Trust. The study's objective was to gain an understanding of staff’s views regarding the culture within the Trust and of their attitudes and behaviours when reviewing clinical incidents and mortality and morbidity. The poster was a winner at the HSJ Patient Safety Congress 2022 in the category 'A just culture for learning and change'. Read the full research paper.
  4. Content Article
    This article in BMJ Open Quality aimed to improve patient safety by examining the organisational and individual factors that contribute to adverse events, enabling corrective action so that errors are not repeated. Using interviews and observations of Trust meetings at a single Hospital Trust in the Midlands, England, this qualitative study: analysed whether the attitudes and behaviours of clinicians and managers are aligned with a Just Culture. identified barriers and enablers to an organisation adopting a Just Culture. The study found evidence of a fair incident management process within the Trust; however, there was no agreed vision of a Just Culture and the majority of the staff were unfamiliar with the term. Negative perspectives relating to clinical incidents and their management persist among staff with many having concerns about being the subject of an investigation and doubts about whether they drive improvement.
  5. Content Article
    This investigation by the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) explored the detection and diagnosis of jaundice in newborn babies, in particular babies born prematurely (before 37 weeks of pregnancy). Specifically, it explored delayed diagnosis due to there being no obvious visual signs of jaundice apparent to clinical staff. Jaundice is a condition caused by too much bilirubin in a person’s blood. Bilirubin is a yellow substance produced when red blood cells are broken down. If left undiagnosed and untreated, high bilirubin levels in newborn babies can lead to significant harm. Newborn babies have a higher number of red blood cells in their blood which increases their risk of jaundice. Jaundice can cause yellowing of the skin and whites of the eyes; however, sometimes the visual signs of jaundice are not obvious, particularly for premature or newborn babies with brown or black skin. The reference event for this investigation was the case of baby Elliana, who was born at 32 weeks and 1 day via a forceps delivery and then transferred to the Trust’s special care baby unit (SCBU). Elliana was assessed on admission to the SCBU by staff as a clinically stable premature baby and a routine blood sample was taken from around two hours after her birth to establish a baseline. Analysis of the blood sample indicated bilirubin was present and so the level was measured. This result was uploaded onto the Trust’s computer system alongside the results of the blood tests that had been requested by the clinical team. The bilirubin result was seen by a SCBU member of staff who recognised that the level was high, indicating the possible need for treatment. However, this member of staff was then required to attend an emergency and the bilirubin result was not acted upon. Another blood sample was taken when Elliana was two days old and was uploaded to the Trust’s computer system. It is unclear if this bilirubin result was seen by staff; it was not documented in clinical records and was not acted upon. Over the next two days, Elliana continued to show no visible signs of jaundice that were detected by staff and she was documented to be developing well. When Elliana was five days old, a change in her skin colour was observed and visible signs of jaundice were detected. A further blood sample was taken which showed she had a high level of bilirubin in her blood and treatment was started accordingly. Elliana’s bilirubin levels returned to within acceptable levels over the next three days and she was subsequently discharged home.
  6. Content Article
    This article in The Times explains why the Times Health Commission was set up, what it aims to achieve and how it will do this. The year-long commission aims to address the most urgent challenges facing health and social care including the growing pressure on budgets, the A&E crisis, rising waiting lists, health inequalities, obesity and the ageing population. Commissioners will draw up recommendations in ten areas to identify problems and find solutions. The Commission will publish its final report in January 2024.
  7. Content Article
    This video published by the Irish Health Service Executive (HSE) tells the story of Pat, whose bowel cancer diagnosis was missed, resulting in his premature death. His daughter Patricia talks about the two investigations that took place into her father's death and how the hospital's internal investigation failed to acknowledge that a staff member had raised concerns about Pat's initial colonoscopy on five occasions, but this had not been followed up. She describes the impact of these events on her father and the rest of the family and calls on medical professionals to "trust us (families) more and fear solicitors less."
  8. Content Article
    In a blog for National Voices, the leading coalition of health and social care charities in England, Patient Safety Learning’s Chief Executive Helen Hughes discusses an independent report written by risk expert Tim Edwards that highlights serious and widespread safety concerns around the misdiagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
  9. Content Article
    Dr Freya Smith, a Specialty Trainee in General Practice, reflects on the sinister and toxic side of medicine, using the recent Paterson and vaginal mesh scandals to demonstrate how patients have been let down by the system. In an honest and personal account, she shares with us the horror and sadness she felt at learning of these scandals and how she aspires to keep her future patients safe.
  10. Content Article
    In this blog, Matthew Wain highlights how NHS organisations can support staff with patient safety investigations, and more generally, in the face of increased pressure. He looks at missed learning opportunities, psychological impact, and the support tools and programmes available for staff. Further reading: Patient Safety Learning's Staff Support Guide: a good practice resource following serious patient harm
  11. Content Article
    Recording of the Health and Social Care Committee meeting held on Tuesday 13 December 2022. Meeting started at 10.03am, ended 11.45am.
  12. Content Article
    A guide to the terms commonly used in safety investigations and their definitions.
  13. Content Article
    Elizabeth Holmes, the 38 year old founder of failed diagnostic start-up Theranos, was sentenced to more than 11 years in prison this November. The sentence was handed down nearly a year after she was found guilty of defrauding investors about her finger prick blood testing devices, and seven years after the Wall Street Journal published its first investigation exposing the company’s struggles. Theranos’ customers received false laboratory test results indicating life threatening conditions such as cancer and HIV. Patients were left to wait anxiously while traditional laboratories repeated the tests, and at least one customer stopped taking his medication on the basis of erroneous results. Holmes was ultimately not convicted of charges relating to patient harm, instead she will be locked up for misleading wealthy investors.
  14. Content Article
    In this blog, Patient Safety Learning’s Chief Executive Helen Hughes reflects on some of the key patient safety issues and developments over the past 12 months and looks ahead to 2023.
  15. Content Article
    On the 19 July 2021, an investigation commenced into the death of Quinn Lias Parker, born on the 14 July 2021, who died on 16 July 2021. The investigation continues and the case will come to Inquest in 2022. Quinn was born in a very poor condition, and it was sadly clear within 1- 2 hours of his birth, that he remained extremely unwell, and there was a high probability that he would not survive. There were concerns raised by his parents at this early point, regarding the care provided by The Trust, in relation to the management of Emmie, his mother, in late pregnancy, and regarding the timing of Quinn’s delivery. In the event of Quinn’s death, it would therefore require referral to the coroner, and thought needed to be given to the preservation of the placenta, to ensure that it was available for examination as part of the Paediatric post mortem. In this case, the placenta was cut into/dissected after Quinn’s death without discussion with the Coroner. This has affected the ability of the Paediatric Pathologist instructed by the Coroner, to determine the likely cause of Emmie’s antepartum haemorrhage. Whilst the medical cause of Quinn’s death will be explored in full at the Inquest, it is likely that the antepartum haemorrhage, and the underlying pathology causing it, is directly related to Quinn’s death. It is not clear how the placenta was cut into after Quinn’s death without discussion with the Coroner - this will be fully explored at the Inquest, but what is clear is that the outcome is highly detrimental to the independent investigation by the Coroner and other agencies investigating the circumstances of this case. This death follows a number of similar early neonatal deaths in Nottingham, where the placenta has not been retained, and therefore key information regarding placental pathology has been lost
  16. Content Article
    This editorial in the Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management reflects on the achievements of the organisation Action Against Medical Accidents (AvMA) over the past 40 years and looks at the emerging role of Patient Safety Learning amongst organisations working for patient safety. Helen Hughes, Chief Executive of Patient Safety Learning, and Albert Wu, Editor-in-chief of the journal, reflect on the purpose and value of patient safety charities and not-for-profit organisations, highlighting the ways in which they channel and champion the patient voice and campaign to address specific areas of recurrent harm. They discuss the vital nature of the patient perspective in driving safety improvements in healthcare, and look at how these organisations amplify this. They also talk about the role of Patient Safety Learning and what it is doing to both drive system change at policy level, and share widely the knowledge of risk and good practice for safer care. They discuss the ways in which Patient Safety Learning delivers its aim to "listen to and promote the voice of the patient safety front line - patients, families and staff.”
  17. Content Article
    Jenny Edwards died in February 2022 from pulmonary embolism, following misdiagnosis. In this blog, her son Tim introduces us to Jenny, illustrating the deep loss felt following her premature passing. He talks about the care she received and argues that there were multiple points at which pulmonary embolism should have been suspected. Tim found the investigation that followed Jenny’s death to be lacking in objectivity and assurance that any learning could be taken forward. He has since produced an independent report, drawing on existing data, freedom of information requests and his mother’s case, to highlight broader safety issues.
  18. Content Article
    This cross-sectional study in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine aimed to understand the relationship between financial conflicts of interest and recommendations for atrial fibrillation (AF) screening in the UK. The authors looked at whether the UK media recommend for or against screening for AF and the financial conflicts of interests of AF screening commentators. The authors found that the vast majority of UK media promotes screening for AF, in contrast to the position of the independent UK National Screening Committee, which recommends against screening. Most commentators, internal NHS organisations and UK charities promoting screening had a direct or indirect financial conflict of interest. Independent information was rare and the reasons for this are unknown. They recommend readers consider the potential impact of financial conflicts on recommendations to screen.
  19. Content Article
    This report from the National Child Mortality Database (NCMD) covers the two-year period from 2019 to 2021, and is unique in two ways. It is the first national report to have investigated all unexpected deaths of infants and children—not just those that remained unexplained. It is also the first national review of the 'multi-agency investigation process' into unexpected deaths. The report found that, of all infant and child deaths occurring between April 2019 and March 2021 in England, 30% occurred suddenly and unexpectedly, and of these 64% had no immediately apparent cause. Other key findings relating to sudden and unexpected infant deaths (under 1 year) include: 70% were aged between 28 and 364 days, and 57% were male Infant death rates were higher in urban areas and the most deprived neighbourhoods For sudden and unexpected infant deaths that occurred during 2020 and had been fully reviewed, 52% were classified as unexplained (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) and 48% went on to be explained by other causes such as metabolic or cardiac conditions.
  20. Content Article
    This policy paper, published by the Department of Health and Social Care, provides an update on the UK Government’s progress in implementing the recommendations of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety (IMMDS) Review, sometimes referred to as the Cumberlege Review.
  21. Content Article
    Patient safety incident investigations (PSII) are system-based responses to a patient safety incident for learning and improvement. Typically, a PSII includes four phases: planning, information gathering, synthesis, and interpreting and improving. More meaningful involvement can help reduce the risk of compounded harm for patients, families and staff, and can improve organisational learning, by listening to and valuing different perspectives.
  22. Content Article
    The Invited Reviews service was formed in 1998 and offers consultancy services to healthcare organisations on which they may require independent and external advice. Reviews provide an opportunity to healthcare organisations to deal with issues and concerns at an early stage. Medical directors (MDs) or chief executive officers (CEOs) of healthcare organisations can request an invited review when they feel the practice of clinical medicine is compromised and there are potential concerns over patient safety. The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) Invited Reviews service has gained a wealth of experience dealing with demanding situations involving individuals, teams, departments and services. This is their learning from invited reviews report. It brings together their experiences across multiple specialities, identifying common themes and crystallising some of our generic findings, which will prove useful to all in clinical leadership roles.
  23. Content Article
    In this episode of the What the HealthTech? podcast, Radar Healthcare's Chief Product Officer Mark Fewster speaks to Helen Hughes, Chief Executive of Patient Safety Learning. to get the lowdown on NHS England's new Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF). Helen talks about how PSIRF is going to drive an open and just culture, what can be expected after the transition and why the implementation process is key to PSIRF's success. Listen on Spotify Listen on YouTube
  24. Content Article
    Pulmonary embolism is the third most common cause of cardiovascular death worldwide after stroke and heart attack. Although life-threatening, when diagnosed promptly survival rates are good.  This report, authored by risk expert Tim Edwards and published by Patient Safety Learning, highlights serious and widespread patient safety concerns relating to the misdiagnosis of pulmonary embolisms.  Drawing on existing data, freedom of information requests and his mother’s case, he outlines nine calls for action to improve pulmonary embolism care. 
  25. Content Article
    An expert review of the clinical records of 44 deceased patients who had been under the care of neurologist Dr Michael Watt has found there were “significant failures” in their treatment and care. Dr Watt, a former Belfast Health and Social Care Trust consultant neurologist, was at the centre of Northern Ireland’s largest ever recall of patients, which began in 2018, after concerns were raised about his clinical work. More than 4,000 of his former patients attended recall appointments. At the direction of the Department of Health, in August 2021, the Regulation and Quality Improvement Authority (RQIA) commissioned the Royal College of Physicians to undertake an expert review of the clinical records of certain deceased patients who had been under the care of Dr Watt, with the intention to understand his clinical practice, to ensure learning for others and to help make care better and safer in the future.
×
×
  • Create New...