Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Patient engagement'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning campaigns
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • Patient Safety Standards
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
    • Data and insight
    • Research
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Categories

  • Files

Calendars

  • Community Calendar

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


First name


Last name


Country


Join a private group (if appropriate)


About me


Organisation


Role

Found 1,340 results
  1. News Article
    The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) awarded Patients for Patient Safety US (PFPS US) a $100,000 Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Award for a new project called “Patients Involved in deVeloping Outcomes Together” or “Project PIVOT.” Project PIVOT is a novel patient-led initiative to advance the integration of patient-centred patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported experiences (PREs) into Patient-Centered Outcome Research (PCOR), Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Research (CER) and quality assessment measurement tools to improve patient safety, diagnostic quality, and equity. “This award will allow us to identify opportunities to capture—directly from patients and families—their care experiences and challenges, filling key gaps in the traditional data sources used to evaluate healthcare quality and safety,” stated Sue Sheridan, co-founder of PFPS US. In contrast to traditional tools, such as clinical outcome measures and hospital readmission rates, Project PIVOT’s long-term goal is to make healthcare safer and more equitable by capturing and learning from patients’ experiences related to patient safety, diagnostic quality and bias. Project PIVOT will have a special focus on historically underserved communities to help define which questions and outcomes are most important to capture. Priority areas of focus include maternal/newborn health in communities of colour, the physical, intellectual and developmental disability communities and older adults. Read full story Source: Newswire, 13 May 2024
  2. Content Article
    The NHS Health Check is a free check-up of your overall health. It can tell you whether you're at higher risk of getting certain health problems, such as heart disease, diabetes, kidney disease and stroke. Local authority commissioners have a statutory responsibility for delivering the NHS Health check to the eligible population within their area. All the information collected through NHS Health Checks is sent through to the relevant GP practice, and results in either no action required, lifestyle and behaviour advice and information to reduce CVD risk, or clinical intervention if needed. The Professional Records Standards Body (PRSC) is running a survey to gain views form healthcare professionals and IT system suppliers on the information recorded through NHS Health Checks. The results of the survey will inform the development of an information standard that will ensure that the information collected is recorded and communicated in a standardised format, using recognised clinical coding wherever possible. The government is also undertaking the development of a digital version of the NHS Health Check as a delivery option for the future, where a person can choose to complete the health check questions online and carry out biometric tests at home, before the results are written back to the GP record–therefore some questions in the survey may reflect this new development by way of future proofing the information standard once a digital option is available.
  3. Content Article
    Project PIVOT is a new initiative led by Patients for Patient Safety US (PFPS US) that aims to advance the implementation of patient-centred patient-reported experiences (PREs) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to improve patient safety, diagnostic accuracy and equity in healthcare. Project PIVOT will provide an opportunity for diverse patients, communities of patients and patient organisations to collaborate with national and international experts and provide input via novel engagement methods to identify and prioritise PREs and PROs which are related to patient safety, diagnostic accuracy and equity–things that matter most to patients. Patients will also have opportunities to identify how and when they prefer to report their experiences and outcomes. Additionally, Project PIVOT will engage healthcare system leaders to identify and prioritise their PREs and PROs to explore possible synergies and integration with the PROs and PREs identified by patients. Project PIVOT is accepting applications from individuals interested in joining the project via the PFPS US website.
  4. Content Article
    In this blog, Kristy Widdicombe-Dutch shares her decades-long experience of harmful healthcare that has left her with a complete loss of trust in the system. She describes how, starting in her 20s, she has experienced disbelief, gaslighting and poor care in relation to her vascular issues, which has left her with long-term physical harm and psychological trauma.
  5. Content Article
    Carolyn Cleveland has delivered training on empathy and compassion to healthcare organisations for many years. In this interview, she describes how she came to develop her training approach and outlines how creating a psychologically space environment for individuals to engage with the practice of empathy contributes to safer organisational cultures.
  6. Content Article
    Patient (Lived Experience) Leadership is about those affected by life-changing illness, injury or disability who want to influence change through being equal partners in decision-making. In this monthly expert briefing for Health Service Journal, patient leadership champion David Gilbert picks out the most significant developments in a field of increasing relevance to the NHS. 
  7. Content Article
    Co-production is a method of engaging with communities, via partnership and power-sharing between professionals and communities to co-create solutions and decisions, with the intended long-term benefit of improving healthcare delivery and outcomes. This report from NHS Providers outlines the principles of co-production and actions trusts can take to apply engagement methodologies across their organisation. It provides an overview of different forms of engagement and summarises the potential benefits to trusts, including improved patient experiences and outcomes, and the delivery of more inclusive healthcare services that better meet the needs of local communities. It also makes the connection between engagement, co-production and the broader health inequalities agenda, unlocking the potential for collaboratively developing solutions to address complex barriers to health services experienced by some communities.
  8. Content Article
    A large number of people live with long-term breathlessness that has a significant impact on their daily lives. For some, breathlessness is not directly linked to an underlying, diagnosable illness, and these people can struggle to access effective treatment and support. In this interview, respiratory doctor Anna Moore explains some of the causes of breathlessness including its links to a wide range of socioeconomic factors. She outlines the person-centred, multi-disciplinary approach her team at Barts Health is taking to help people overcome breathlessness and highlights the need for more research in this area.
  9. Content Article
    The MAPLE project led by the Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, aims to co-produce an accessible patient information leaflet (PIL) that will aim to improve diversity in those who choose to take part in clinical research. The first stage of this work is to understand the barriers preventing people taking part in clinical research and gain views on how existing, accessible PILs may address these barriers. National Voices was commissioned to work with relevant charities and the people they advocate for to understand barriers to participation in clinical research, including, but not limited to literacy.
  10. Content Article
    Little Voices is a project run by Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust to amplify the voices of children who were patients at the Trust. Little Voices helped inform and support the Trust's ambition to deliver care in a setting that is child-friendly and equitable for all children. Getting input directly from children of a young age enhanced the Trust's understanding of what accessing care is really like for a child, seen through their eyes and not those of a parent or carer. Specific improvements are being implemented in the areas of hand hygiene, mealtimes that matter, play that is engaging and reducing fear and anxiety.
  11. Content Article
    A growing number of patients with eating disorders are reporting having treatment withdrawn by services, often without notice and without their consent. We spoke to eating disorder campaigner Hope Virgo about how pressures on services, enduring stigma around eating disorders and dangerous new narratives are leading to the practice of treatment withdrawal. Hope explains how this is affecting vulnerable patients and highlights that as the number of people developing eating disorders increases, the risks to patient safety will only get worse.
  12. Content Article
    Disordered eating can affect anyone, but it can be confusing to understand and recognise it in our own personal experiences. This guide, published by East London NHS Foundation Trust, is a snapshot of how adults in East London have navigated those experiences of uncertainty while seeking support for disordered eating. For many of the contributors, preconceptions about what an eating disorder is (or isn’t) have previously acted as a barrier to seeking or receiving support. It also contains advice on how to seek support for disordered eating.
  13. Content Article
    On 17 and 18 April 2024, government ministers, high-level representatives and health experts from all over the world gathered in Santiago, Chile for the Sixth Global Ministerial Summit on Patient Safety. In this long-read article, Patient Safety Learning’s Chief Executive Helen Hughes reflects on the key themes and issues discussed at the event.
  14. Content Article
    Healthcare services improvisation relies heavily on collaborating with patients and caregivers by acknowledging their feedback to enhance quality and safety. The 2023 World Patient Safety Day underscores the significance of co-production with patients in safety strategies. In accordance with this, a crucial tool that involves patients and caregivers is the “Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs)” that help in assessing healthcare delivery in terms of quality, safety and performance. These tools for various healthcare processes offer valuable insights into treatment effectiveness and areas needing improvement. PREMs are surveys used to assess patients' care experiences objectively, aiding in pinpointing the areas for improvement. Unlike patient satisfaction measures, which reflect only subjective evaluations, PREMs offer an objective view of care encounters. In view of the importance of a standardised tool for Indian health care organisations, CAHO in collaboration with various stakeholders and patients unveil the White paper on Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) tool development process. This white paper was released by the honourable governor of West Bengal, Dr C.V Ananda Bose at the recently concluded CAHOCON 2024 at Biswa Bangla, Kolkata.
  15. Content Article
    In this blog Dr Henrietta Hughes, Patient Safety Commissioner for England, outlines the activities included in the Patient Safety Commissioner Business Plan 2024-25.
  16. Content Article
    Measures exist to improve early recognition of, and response to, deteriorating patients in hospital. However, deteriorating patients continue to go unrecognized. To address this, interventions have been developed that invite patients and relatives to escalate patient deterioration to a rapid response team. To systematically review articles that describe these interventions and investigate their effectiveness at reducing preventable deterioration.
  17. Content Article
    Measures exist to improve early recognition of and response to deteriorating patients in hospital. However, management of critical illness remains a problem globally; in the United Kingdom, 7% of the deaths reported to National Reporting and Learning System from acute hospitals in 2015 related to failure to recognize or respond to deterioration. The current study explored whether routinely recording patient-reported wellness is associated with objective measures of physiology to support early recognition of hospitalised deteriorating patients.
  18. Content Article
    Measures exist to improve early recognition of, and response to deteriorating patients in hospital. Despite these, 7% of the deaths reported to the National Reporting and Learning System from acute hospitals in 2015 related to a failure to recognise or respond to deterioration. Interventions have been developed that allow patients and relatives to escalate patient deterioration to a critical care outreach team. However, there is not a strong evidence base for the clinical effectiveness of these interventions, or patients’ ability to recognise deterioration. The aims of this study were to (a) identify methods of involving patients in recognising deterioration in hospital, generated by health professionals, and (b) to develop and evaluate an identified method of patient involvement in practice, and explore its feasibility and acceptability from the perspectives of patients. The preliminary findings suggest that patient-reported wellness may predict subsequent improvement or decline in their condition as indicated by objective measurements of physiology (NEWS). Routinely recording patient-reported wellness during observation shows promise for supporting the early recognition of clinical deterioration in practice, although confirmation in larger-scale studies is required.
  19. Content Article
    Public confidence in the NHS is at an all time low and even when people can access the service, national surveys tell us that their experiences of NHS services are deteriorating. The authors of this blog—Patients Association Trustee Alf Collins and Health Consultant Richard Sloggett—make a simple plea: that all aspects of patient experience is taken seriously. They argue that the care backlogs and levels of unmet need require a radical re-orientation of the relationship between the Government, the health system and the public, and that this needs to involve a complete step-change in how patients are engaged in their care.
  20. Content Article
    In this anonymous blog, a member of NHS staff talks about their experience promoting digital storytelling to help staff members and the wider trust learn from patients’ perspectives on incidents of harm. They describe the conflicting pressures of leaders’ concerns about how these stories might affect the Trust's reputation and the need to be transparent with patients and staff.
  21. Content Article
    How we talk about health is important, and even those with the best intentions don't always do it well. Krista Lamb is an author and science communicator in Toronto. For years she has helped scientists, physicians, advocates and others share their healthcare stories effectively. Along the way, some of them have taught her how we can and should talk about health in ways that are empathetic, understandable and accurate. In this podcast she asks those people to share their tips and tricks to help everyone communicate better.
  22. Content Article
    The Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) came into operation on 1 October 2023. One of the organisation's key priorities is to develop a new strategy, outlining the long-term goals and themes that underpin its objectives. This consultation is an opportunity to engage and shape HSSIB's strategy and investigation criteria for the future. The organisation is inviting comments and suggestions for improvement from all stakeholders. Comments can be submitted via this online survey. The deadline for submissions to the consultation is 16 May 2024.
  23. News Article
    The Government is inviting views on how well GP practices and other NHS organisations are complying with their legal duty of candour when things go wrong. Patients and health professionals are being asked whether the statutory duty is well understood and adequately regulated by the CQC. Under the statutory duty of candour, introduced for all CQC-registered providers in 2015, GP practices must be open and honest with their patients when something goes wrong and has caused harm. In December, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) announced a review into whether healthcare providers are following the duty of candour rules. This was in response to concerns that the duty is not always being met and that there is variation in how the rules are being applied. The DHSC has published its ‘call for evidence’ to gather views on how well the duty of candour obligation is working for both patients and health professionals. Patients have been asked whether GP practices and other providers ‘demonstrate meaningful and compassionate engagement’ with patients who have been affected by an incident. The call for evidence also asks for views on whether the criteria for triggering the duty are appropriate and well understood by staff. Read full story Source: Pulse, 16 April 2024
  24. Content Article
    Those who use any type of health or social care service have a right to be informed about all elements of their care and treatment. Health and social care providers have that fundamental responsibility to be open and honest with those who are under their management and care. In particular, when things go wrong during the provision of care and treatment, patients and service users and their families or caregivers expect to be informed honestly about what happened, what can be done to deal with any harm caused, and to know what will be done to prevent a recurrence to someone else. In November 2014, the government introduced a statutory (organisational) duty of candour for NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts via Regulation 20 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008. In essence, the duty places a direct obligation upon trusts to be open and honest with patients and service users, and their families, when something goes wrong that appears to have caused or could lead to moderate harm or worse in the future (known as a ‘notifiable safety incident’). The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) are seeking views on the statutory duty of candour for health and social care providers in England. This call for evidence closes at 11:59 pm on 29 May 2024.
  25. Content Article
    The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is supporting health and social care organisations to ensure they are being transparent with people about how their personal information is being used. The UK data protection regulator has today published new guidance to provide regulatory certainty on how these organisations should keep people properly informed. The health and social care sectors routinely handle sensitive information about the most intimate aspects of someone’s health, which is provided in confidence to trusted practitioners. Under data protection law, people have a right to know what is happening to their personal information, which is particularly important when accessing vital services. The guidance will help organisations to understand the definition of transparency and assess appropriate levels of transparency, as well as providing practical steps to developing effective transparency information.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.