-
Posts
1,180 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Mark Hughes
MembersContent Type
Communities
Learn
News
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Mark Hughes
-
News Article
NHS England publishes fresh guidance on safe use of ambient scribes
Mark Hughes posted a news article in News
NHS England has published new guidance on the use of AI-powered ambient scribing tools in health and care settings, setting out how organisations can safely adopt the technology while meeting data protection and patient rights requirements. Ambient scribes are AI tools that passively listen to clinical conversations and automatically generate outputs such as consultation notes, summaries or letters. The technology helps reduce administrative burden and allows clinicians to spend more time with patients. The guidance, developed with input from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and the National Data Guardian (NDG), includes sections for patients, healthcare workers, and IG professionals. Read full article. Source: Digital Health, 2 April 2026 -
News Article
Deaths linked to ‘overwhelmed’ department
Mark Hughes posted a news article in News
At least eight cancer patients were harmed – and in some cases potentially died – because of operational and admin failures in an “overwhelmed” hospital department, HSJ has learned. A thematic review of 15 cases from the urology department at East Kent Hospitals University Foundation Trust said several of the patients had died, in some cases having developed metastatic cancer, following missed or late diagnoses. Others had suffered psychological harm as a result of delays. Read full article (paywalled). Source: Health Service Journal, 2 April 2026- Posted
-
- Patient death
- Lack of resources
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
Jesy Nelson ‘proud’ as NHS announces rollout of SMA screening for newborns
Mark Hughes posted a news article in News
Former Little Mix star Jesy Nelson has said she is “proud” of having reached a “major milestone” as a rollout of screenings for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is to begin earlier than expected. The singer, 34, campaigned for all newborn babies to be screened for SMA after her twins, Ocean Jade and Story Monroe Nelson, were diagnosed with the rare condition, which causes progressive muscle wastage. In a letter addressed to Nelson and Giles Lomax, the chief executive of the charity SMA UK, health secretary Wes Streeting confirmed that screenings will be rolled out earlier than planned and begin as part of in-screening evaluations (ISE) from October 2026 instead of January 2027. Read full article. Source: The Independent, 2 April 2026 -
Content Article
The Infected Blood Inquiry (2024), the 10 Year Health Plan for England and the Department of Health and Social Care’s Review of patient safety across the health and care landscape (2025) have all highlighted the need for more systematic approaches to safety management in healthcare. This statement summarises NHS England’s position on the potential for safety management systems to improve patient safety. -
Content Article
Published by NHS Wales Performance and Improvement, this plan is intended to guide and drive patient safety improvements throughout Wales over a five-year period. It aims to reduce avoidable harm and build a culture where learning and improvement are at the heart of everything the NHS does. Aim of the National Patient Safety Plan Listening, leading and learning for safer care in Wales. This will be achieved through three foundational pillars which run consistently throughout and shape the direction of the Plan: Listening Listening goes beyond hearing — it amplifies the voices of patients, staff and partners to shape safer care and turn feedback into actionable insight. Embedding co-production ensures lived and learned experiences drive meaningful improvements. By focusing on prevention, tackling harm and inequalities early and creating transparent feedback loops, this approach builds trust, strengthens relationships and ensures the healthcare system reflects what matters most to the people it serves. Leadership Visible, accountable leadership makes patient safety a core strategic priority. Leaders create systems and cultures that foster transparency, learning and reliability, while empowering multi-disciplinary teams to identify risks, act quickly and prevent harm through continuous improvement. Learning Proactive, systematic use of real-time insights and data —coupled with collaborative reflection—to drive continuous redesign of healthcare systems, foster transparency and feedback and co-create improvements in safety. Incorporating a learning approach that not only detects errors and implements corrective actions but also embodies ongoing, collective and system-wide learning that embeds safety into everyday healthcare practice. National Clinical Safety Priorities The Plan sets out six strategic national clinical safety priorities for specific focus identified by healthcare organisations and Welsh Government: Acute physical deterioration Deconditioning in the community Health care associated infections Improving safety in secondary care mental health services People with learning disabilities and neurodivergence Maternity and neonatal services Summary of the Plan -
Content Article
World Patient Safety Day 2026
Mark Hughes posted an article in WHO
This year’s World Patient Safety Day on 17 September is focused on the theme ”Safe care for noncommunicable diseases”. This article explains the aims of the event and the areas it will cover. Thursday 17 September 2026 marks the seventh annual World Patient Safety Day. World Patient Safety Day aims to: increase public awareness and engagement enhance global understanding work towards global solidarity and concerted action by all countries and international partners to improve patient safety. The theme of this year’s event is “Safe care for noncommunicable diseases”.[1] Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) tend to be of long duration and are the result of a combination of genetic, physiological, environmental and behavioural factors. Common types of NCDs include cardiovascular diseases (such as heart attacks and stroke), cancers, chronic respiratory diseases (such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma) and diabetes. People of all age groups, regions and countries are affected by NCDs, although they are often associated with older age groups. NCDs disproportionately affect people in low- and middle-income countries, where nearly three quarters of global NCD deaths (32 million) occur.[2] People living with NCDs can need care across multiple settings over long periods of time, with multiple points where safety risks can arise. Objectives of World Patient Safety Day 2026 Raise global awareness of patient safety challenges associated with NCDs across the continuum of care through a primary health care approach while considering disease-related factors, health system challenges and determinants of health that may increase the risk of harm. Promote the meaningful engagement of people living with NCDs and communities, in identifying safety risks and co-developing solutions with health practitioners, organizational leaders and policy-makers. Encourage stakeholders to integrate patient safety principles across NCD-related legislation, policies, strategies and programmes, with an emphasis on strengthening primary health care oriented health systems. Support health workers in strengthening patient safety practices such as safer diagnosis, medication safety and meaningful patient engagement. Key messages People living with NCDs are at increased risk of harm in health care. This risk is driven by the long-term and complex nature of NCDs, health system challenges such as fragmented care and broader factors that affect access to safe care, such as poverty and discrimination. Risks must be addressed across the continuum of care and in daily life. Safety risks can arise at every stage, from prevention, early detection and diagnosis to treatment and long-term management, across health care settings, homes and communities. Strong, integrated health systems and a supported health workforce are essential for safe care. Strengthening primary health care, supporting health workers and addressing barriers that affect access to safe care through multisectoral action, are key to reducing harm. People living with NCDs must be partners in safe care. Meaningful engagement, learning from people with lived experience and supporting health literacy reduces harm and leads to safer, better-quality care. Calls to action People living with or at risk of NCDs and their caregivers - Stay informed. Stay engaged. Stay safe. Don't miss opportunities for prevention. Learn about NCD risk factors, participate in recommended screening and preventive care, and seek help early when you notice warning signs. Know your condition and safety risks. Understand your diagnosis, tests, treatments and possible sources of harm related to your condition. Follow basic safety practices such as hand hygiene and double-checking your medications. Know your rights and be an active partner in your care. Take part in health care discussions and decisions about your care. Ask questions, confirm your understanding and speak up if you have concerns or notice safety practices being missed. Be your own "information officer". Keep an accurate record of your symptoms, test results, medications and appointments, including when travelling or when away from home. Use tools like electronic records, reminders or trusted health apps to track your readings, medications, test results and appointments. Navigate transitions safely. Stay alert during "handover" moments between health practitioners and during referrals and discharge. Make sure you are clear about your medications, follow-up appointments and who to contact if your symptoms worsen. Follow up on your test results — "No news" is not always good news. Master your self-care. Know how to use your medications, medical devices and digital health tools correctly. Know your warning signs and when to seek help Health practitioners - Make NCD care safe at every step. Prioritise meaningful engagement. Partner with people living with NCDs as expert team members. Support shared decision-making. Empower people living with NCDs to recognize risks, manage their care safely and identify warning signs that require action. Promote prevention and reduce risk. Identify and address modifiable risk factors, support healthy lifestyles and provide evidence-based preventive interventions. Ensure early detection and accurate diagnosis. Reduce delays, avoid missed or incorrect diagnoses by maintaining a high index of suspicion about NCD-related risks, and interpret tests carefully, especially in people with multiple conditions. Identify risks and prevent harm. Take proactive steps to prevent harm across the continuum of care, such as missed prevention opportunities, delayed or incorrect diagnoses, medication errors, procedural risks and device-related harm. Ensure continuity and coordination of care. Communicate clearly, manage transitions safely and maintain follow-up across health practitioners and settings. Learn and improve continuously. Report incidents, share good practices and contribute to a culture of safety and continuous improvement. Health care facility managers - Establish systems that enable safe NCD care Prevent harm through early action. Establish systems that support evidence-based preventive services and risk assessment, early detection, timely management and ongoing follow-up. Enforce rigorous safety standards. Standardize care and implement protocols to address the major sources of harm. Ensure continuity and coordination of care. Establish standardized processes for handovers, referrals and discharge across practitioners and health care settings. Embed meaningful engagement within facility governance. Involve people living with NCDs in facility boards, safety committees and the design of care processes. Support and enable the workforce. Provide training, resources and supportive working conditions. Foster teamwork and open communication between staff members. Use lived experience and data to improve care. Establish a safety culture, promote incident reporting by health workers and patients and use lived experience to drive continuous improvement. Policy-makers and health care leaders - Embed safety in every NCD policy and programme. Integrate safety into NCD policies and legislation. Ensure safety is embedded in national strategies to deliver on commitments from the 2025 UN Political Declaration on NCDs. Promote prevention and early detection. Strengthen policies and programmes that support risk reduction, preventive services, screening and early detection of NCDs. Strengthen primary health care for safe NCD care. Build integrated, people-centred systems that provide continuous and coordinated care, and address barriers that prevent people from accessing safe NCD services. Ensure sustainable financing and financial protection. Mobilize and sustain resources and reduce financial barriers for accessing safe essential NCD services for all. Invest in a capable health workforce. Train, support and retain health workers with the competencies needed to deliver safe NCD care. Engage people with lived experience. Establish mechanisms to involve civil society in the design, delivery and accountability of NCD care. Civil society organisations - Mobilise action for safer NCD care. Advocate for safer NCD care. Call for the prioritization of safety and quality in NCD policies, programmes and services. Strengthen health literacy and promote early action. Provide trusted information and practical support to help people understand NCD risks, recognize early signs, and seek timely screening and care. Support safe care in everyday life. Help people living with NCDs to follow their care safely, recognize risks such as medication errors or missed care, and identify warning signs that require action. Break down barriers and promote equity. Help identify and overcome barriers such as stigma, discrimination and low health literacy that may be preventing people from accessing safe care for NCDs. Empower people to speak up. Create a culture where people feel confident to ask questions, raise concerns and insist on being heard when they feel something is wrong with their care. Collaborate for safety. Represent people with lived experience in policy dialogue and work with health workers to co-create safer systems. Share your views and experiences on the hub Do you have experiences or views around the theme of this year’s World Patient Safety Day that you would like to share? You can share your thoughts with us by commenting below (sign up here for free first), submitting a blog, or by emailing us at [email protected]. References World Health Organization. Announcing World Patient Safety Day 2026 – Safe care for noncommunicable diseases. 30 March 2026. World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases. 25 September 2025. Related reading Find out more about previous World Patient Safety Days in the blogs below: World Patient Safety Day 2025 World Patient Safety Day 2024 World Patient Safety Day 2023 World Patient Safety Day 2022 World Patient Safety Day 2021 -
News Article
NHS waiting times in Wales plunge to lowest in six years
Mark Hughes posted a news article in News
NHS waiting lists in Wales have fallen to the lowest level in almost six years. The latest waiting time figures, published on March 19, show the average waiting time for treatment is now around 18 weeks – down from 23 weeks in August 2024 and the lowest since the pandemic started. Around 557,900 individual patients are currently on treatment waiting lists in Wales, the NHS Activity and Performance Summary: January and February 2026 shows. At the same time targets are being missed on ambulance times, waits in accident and emergency departments and for cancer treatment, the document also shows. Read full article. Source: Wales Online, 19 March 2026 -
News Article
‘Only two weeks of stock’ at key supplier after Iran-linked cyber attack
Mark Hughes posted a news article in News
NHS England believes there is only two weeks’ stock of crucial surgical equipment and other products following an Iran-linked cyber-attack on a major medical technology supplier. The centre is urgently working to understand the actual extent of supplies currently held by trusts and the potential risks to patient safety of the supply disruption. Read full article (paywalled). Source: Health Service Journal, 19 March 2026- Posted
-
- Medical device / equipment
- Lack of resources
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
On 25 February 2026, healthcare leaders and stakeholders gathered in London for the Patient Safety Forum, organised by Public Policy Projects (PPP) in partnership with Patient Safety Learning. Panellists at this event investigated multifaceted impacts patient safety measures are having on wider system operations. From avoiding duplicated processes and failure demand, to cross-disciplinary learning and efficiency gains, this blog summarises discussions from two panels which highlighted the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework and productivity as focuses for a reforming healthcare system. Read the full article from PPP via the link below.- Posted
-
- PSIRF
- Productivity
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
Improving pregnancy outcomes: 5 key study findings (NIHR, 9 March 2026)
Mark Hughes posted an article in Maternity
Research is crucial to making improvements in healthcare during and after a pregnancy. It can help women make informed decisions about their pregnancy care. This includes identifying treatments to keep both mother and baby safe from infection. This article highlights five key findings related to this from studies funded and supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR).- Posted
-
- Obstetrics and gynaecology/ Maternity
- Maternity
- (and 2 more)
-
Content Article
On 25 February 2026, healthcare leaders and stakeholders gathered in London for the Patient Safety Forum, organised by Public Policy Projects (PPP) in partnership with Patient Safety Learning. This blog summarises two sessions at this event which explored how the patient voice can meaningfully contribute to service improvement, and why better care is contingent on a supported, healthy workforce. Read the full article from PPP via the link below.- Posted
-
- Patient engagement
- Patient involvement
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
This report looks at the past three years since the introduction of the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) and its application in the independent sector. It explains how the Independent Healthcare Providers Network has been supporting its members to implement PSIRF and outlines key learnings that have emerged from this.- Posted
-
1
-
- PSIRF
- Private sector
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
On 25 February 2026, healthcare leaders and stakeholders gathered in London for the Patient Safety Forum, organised by Public Policy Projects (PPP) in partnership with Patient Safety Learning. This blog draws on discussions from two panels at this event which tackled pivotal questions: How to embed safety as a foundational element of healthcare quality Why so many well-intentioned safety recommendations fail to be implemented. With NHS reforms and resource constraints shaping the landscape, these panels offered a compelling call to action for integrating patient safety as a cornerstone of change. Read the full article from PPP via the link below. -
Content Article
The 10 Year Health Plan for England envisions a major shift from hospital to community, towards the creation of a Neighbourhood Health Service. This is intended to bring care into local communities, convene professionals into patient-centred teams and end fragmentation. This policy paper, published by the Department of Health and Social Care, sets out how Integrated Care Boards (ICBs), local authorities, health and wellbeing boards and other partners should create and deliver neighbourhood health services. Neighbourhood health puts the person at the centre of how we deliver their health and care by organising services so they can work together to serve a defined population. This policy paper describes the aims of this approach as follows: Improve people’s health and care outcomes, reduce health inequalities and help them stay well at home This will be done by: focusing on prevention and proactive care management, including using data to effectively manage risk and prevent escalation strengthening primary and community services working better with specialists traditionally based in hospitals, public health, adult and children’s social care, VCSEs and other partners. Organise services around the person with more convenient, personalised and joined-up care Orientate services around a person’s needs, rather than organisational convenience. A strong digital approach will be critical to this. This includes: improving access to care (by phone, online or in person) moving more outpatient care from hospitals into neighbourhoods improving continuity of care for those with longer-term needs more effectively co-ordinating services for those with the most complex needs, for example, those at end of life. Reduce pressure on more acute services - including hospitals and care homes This will be done by: using effective neighbourhood working to decrease avoidable hospital admissions or attendances and facilitate timely discharge reducing the de-conditioning that happens to many people when they spend time in hospital reducing avoidable care home admissions ensuring acute services are focused on those who need them most. Cut waste and duplication This will be done by: integrating services across health, local government and wider partners making full use of digital opportunities ensuring the NHS is more sustainable.- Posted
-
- Neighbourhood services
- Primary care
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
This report from Press Ganey draws on data from 1.3 million employees, 23.5 million patients, and 7.1 million safety events to examine where safety performance is strengthening, where it remains fragile, and what leadership actions will accelerate progress. It uses national safety culture data, workforce engagement metrics, patient safety event reporting patterns, safety outcomes, and patient experience insights. Key insights in this report include: Safety culture is a leading indicator of workforce stability. Seven of the top 10 national key drivers of employee engagement are related to safety culture, placing it among the strongest engagement drivers in the industry. Active reporting means higher performance. Facilities that report safety events at or above the expected rate in the Press Ganey High Reliability Platform™ are more than 8x as likely to rank in the top quartile for employee–manager collaboration, learning from mistakes, teamwork within units, and perception of care quality. Strong learning systems and reporting cultures reinforce one another. Organisations that excel in cause analysis rigor and action plan strength are more likely to sustain robust reporting environments, creating a virtuous cycle of visibility, accountability, and progress. Social capital is the connective tissue that brings everything together. Social capital is the force multiplier behind safety performance. Organisations that lead on employees’ responses to questions about respect and teamwork are 3x more likely to achieve top-quartile patient loyalty scores and 50–80% more likely to excel on key safety outcomes. Safety suffers when a single organisation operates as three hospitals under one roof. Many organisations struggle with consistency of experience depending on shift resulting in what seems to employees and patients like three hospitals under the same roof. Staff perceive safety culture differently and patient experience of care varies based on shift—day, night, or weekend. This variance between days vs. nights and weekends can lead to more safety events and patients feeling less safe. Learnings come from the Patient Safety Organization (PSO). Learnings from the Press Ganey PSO can be leveraged to understand how and when harm occurs across the industry based on trending data. The members of the PSO gather insights from the more than 190 health system partners and 7.1 million patient safety event records in its national database.- Posted
-
- USA
- System safety
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Event
Effectively embedding medication safety into PSIRF
Mark Hughes posted an event in Community Calendar
untilThis interactive session, hosted by the NHS Specialist Pharmacy Service, forms part of the ‘Medication Safety Across the System’ (MSATS) series aimed at healthcare professionals, working in any sector with a role or passion for medication safety and/or involved in medicines use. Speakers share their experience of using the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) and learning response tools to support medication safety improvements. They aim to inspire and equip translation and replication across systems. What will be covered: The impact that embedding medication safety within PSIRF plans can have on the safer use of medicines. Current barriers and challenges to embedding medication safety in PSIRF. The importance of ensuring that the patient and carer perspective is central to PSIRF implementation. Shared exemplar practices where medication safety has been effectively included within PSIRF plans to inform local adaptation. Opportunities to network with peers to inform the development of appropriate local and system wide actions to embed medication safety in PSIRF plans. Register here. -
Content Article
This update presents statistics from the Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) service, a national NHS system for the recording and analysis of patient safety events that occur in healthcare. The LFPSE definition of a patient safety incident is something unexpected or unintended has happened, or failed to happen, that could have or did lead to patient harm for one or more person(s) receiving healthcare. This report shares the patient safety incident data from October to December 2025. Count of Event Types in LFPSE – based on patient safety event records from October 2025 to December 2025 LFPSE brings the feature to record patient safety event types beyond incidents. Recorders can now also upload patient safety risks, outcomes and instances of good care. This is to ensure the database contains more instances of care that the healthcare system can learn from instead of only detailing errors involving patients. In this period, 855,535 events were recorded to LFPSE, the majority of which were recorded as patient safety incidents (97.01%). Count of patient safety incidents by maximum physical harm – based on patient safety incident records from October 2025 to December 2025 Sometimes a problem in care can affect more than one patient, or none at all. To capture this, as a new feature of LFPSE, recorders can submit information for multiple patients per incident, meaning there can be multiple degrees of harm per incident. For the following figure and table NHS England have taken the highest harm level per incident. NHS England identified and removed 66,080 incidents where the number of patients affected was unknown. Preliminary analysis suggests that these records likely represent incidents with no patients involved. NHS England will continue further data quality checks to validate these figures. During this quarter, 763,905 incidents had recorded a degree of harm. The majority of these incidents (94.07%) recorded low or no physical harm to patients. LFPSE has a new variable for grading of the psychological harm associated with the recorded patient safety incidents. This is an experimental field which seeks to explore if responses to safety incidents need to be different if psychological harm is considered separately from physical harm, rather than rolling them together into one measure, as was done in the National Reporting Learning Service (NRLS). Currently, there is low confidence in the grading of psychological harm, as users familiarise themselves with its use, and as such, it is excluded from this report. Related reading – previous quarterly data publications NHS England: Patient Safety Event Data Quarterly Publication – Quarter 2 2025/26 (July to September 2025) NHS England: Patient Safety Event Data Quarterly Publication – Quarter 1 2025/26 (April to June 2025) NHS England: Patient Safety Event Data Quarterly Publication – Quarter 4 2024/25 (January to March 2025) NHS England: Patient Safety Event Data Quarterly Publication – Quarter 3 2024/25 (October to December 2024)- Posted
-
- Patient safety incident
- Data
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
In this article, Patient Safety Learning reflects on the results of the NHS Staff Survey 2025, focusing on responses relating to reporting, speaking up and acting on patient safety concerns. On 12 March 2026 the NHS published the results of its 2025 staff survey.[1] 729,423 staff from 238 organisations took part in this survey, which provides a snapshot of their experiences of working in the health service. The survey includes several questions on reporting patient safety incidents and near misses, concerns about clinical safety and views on speaking up more broadly. As we set out in this analysis, unfortunately the Staff Survey results suggest there are little signs of positive progress across many of these areas. Reporting of errors, near misses and incidents A high number of survey respondents, 86.16%, answered that their organisation encourages staff to report errors, near misses and incidents. However, 40.71% of respondents (over 290,000 staff) subsequently answered that they were unable to say with confidence that their organisation treats them fairly if they are involved in an error, near miss or incident. Answers to both these questions in the Staff Survey have remained fairly consistent across the past four years, as illustrated by the table and graph below. These results suggest there persists a significant disconnect between what organisations tell staff about reporting patient safety issues, and how staff feel they will be treated if they actually raise concerns. 67.3% of staff said that when errors, near misses or incidents are reported, their organisation takes action to ensure that they do not happen again. Responses to this question have also remained fairly static for the past four years (within a range of 67-69%), with nearly a third of staff consistently feeling unable to answer this question with a positive response. Responses to this question also vary significantly according to Trust type, with Community Trusts scoring highest on average (75.91%) and Ambulance Trusts scoring lowest (54.79%). Connected to this, nearly two-fifths of respondents, 38.98%, did not agree that they are given feedback about changes made in response to reported errors, near misses and incidents. When staff are unable to clearly see that their organisation acts on their safety concerns, it is understandable that they may be less motivated to report these. Concerns about clinical safety When asked about whether they would feel secure raising concerns about unsafe clinical practice, 71.1% of respondents answered this positively. Although this is quite a high percentage, the response rate in 2025 means that over 200,000 NHS employees, 28.9% of survey respondents, could not say that they would feel secure raising such concerns. When asked if they were confident that their organisation would address these concerns, 55.49% of staff responded positively. As illustrated by the table and graph below, responses to both these questions have remained fairly consistent across the last five years. Speaking up about concerns Turning to speaking up about concerns more broadly, 39.71% of survey respondents (over 280,000 staff) could not say that they felt safe to speak up about anything that concerns them in their organisation. As with the questions on reporting incidents, errors and near misses, again the average response varies significantly according to Trust type. When looking at Community Trusts, this figure drops to 30.2% but is significantly higher in Acute and Acute & Community Trusts (41.03%) and Ambulance Trusts (45.53%). When asked about their confidence in their organisation addressing their concern, just over half of all respondents did not express confidence that this would happen. As illustrated by the table and graph below, responses to both these questions have remained more or less consistent over the past five years, with a small decline this year. Safety culture in the NHS The 2025 staff survey results show no significant change in responses to questions on reporting, speaking up and acting on patient safety concerns in recent years. While the survey only provides an annual snapshot of experiences of working in the NHS, its findings suggest that a fear of speaking up and a lack of confidence that concerns will be acted on still persists in too many NHS organisations. These issues form a recurring theme across inquiries into major patient safety scandals.[2] [3] [4] They also can be seen reflected in the shocking experiences and testimonies of whistleblowers, such as those highlighted in our Speaking up for patient safety interview series.[5] Staff being able to raise concerns safely and effectively is essential for patient safety. However, as highlighted in a recent review shared by Roger Kline on the hub, the NHS continues to struggle with creating a culture where this happens reliably.[6] [7] Need for action It was notable that the need to tackle problems relating to safety culture was absent in the 10 Year Health Plan for the NHS, as highlighted in our response to this last year.[8] If the healthcare system is to truly be transformed over the next decade, then we cannot simply proceed by ignoring these issues or assuming they will resolve themselves. At Patient Safety Learning, we believe it is vital that we create a culture in healthcare that supports raising, discussing and addressing the risks of unsafe care. Year on year we highlight the stagnant set of staff survey results in this area because we do not believe the lack of improvement in this area is acceptable. Too often, at a national level, it appears that the extent and persistence of blame cultures in healthcare, and the need to tackle this, are acknowledged but action is not taken to address these significant challenges. It is difficult to imagine that the scale evidence of an unsafe culture in other safety critical industries would be tolerated—where the consequences of not addressing the risk in incidents may also be serious injury or loss of life. We hope that the soon to be published new NHS Quality Strategy will reflect on the importance of this issue and that health system leadership will recognise this issue as an urgent priority.[9] References NHS Staff Survey. NHS Staff Survey National Results. 12 March 2026. The Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry, 6 February 2013. Independent review of maternity services at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust. Ockenden Report: Findings, conclusions and essential actions from the independent review of maternity services at The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, 30 March 2022. Independent Investigation into East Kent Maternity Services. Maternity and neonatal services in East Kent – the Report of the Independent Investigation, 19 October 2022. Helen Hughes and Peter Duffy. Key themes emerging from our ‘Speaking up for patient safety’ interview series. Patient Safety Learning, 14 May 2025. Roger Kline. Power and the sound of silence. Patient Safety Learning, 11 March 2026. Roger Kline. Patient safety and speaking up – learning from the literature. Patient Safety Learning, 11 March 2026. Patient Safety Learning. 10 Year Health Plan: Patient Safety Learning’s response. 14 August 2025. Patient Safety Learning and Aqua. Patient safety and the new NHS Quality Strategy. 25 February 2026.- Posted
- 1 comment
-
1
-
- Staff safety
- Psychological safety
- (and 5 more)
-
Content Article
NHS Staff Survey national results 2025 (12 March 2026)
Mark Hughes posted an article in Culture
The NHS Staff Survey is one of the largest workforce surveys in the world and is carried out every year to improve staff experiences across the NHS. It asks staff in England about their experiences of working for their respective NHS organisations. Over 1.5 million NHS employees in England were invited to participate in the survey, with 729,423 staff responding in 2025. Responses to key patient safety questions in this year’s survey included: Reporting of errors, near misses and incidents 33.71% of staff have seen errors, near misses, or incidents that could have hurt staff and/or patients/service users in the last month (2024: 33.64%; 2023: 33.50%; 2022: 33.72%). 59.29% of staff said their organisation treats staff who are involved in an error, near miss or incident fairly (2024: 59.72%; 2023: 59.51%; 2022: 58.22%). 86.16% of staff said their organisation encourages staff to report errors, near misses or incidents (2024: 86.43%; 2023: 86.41%; 2022: 86.14%) 67.30% of staff said that when errors, near misses or incidents are reported, their organisation takes action to ensure that they do not happen again (2024: 68.19%; 2023: 68.20%; 2022: 67.40%) 61.02% of staff said that they are given feedback about changes made in response to reported errors, near misses and incidents (2024: 61.28%; 2023: 61.03%; 2022: 59.89%). Concerns about clinical safety 71.10% of staff said they would feel secure raising concerns about unsafe clinical practice (2024: 71.56%; 2023: 71.47%; 2022: 72.07%; 2021: 75.17%). 55.49% of staff said they were confident that their organisation would address their concern (2024: 56.82%; 2023: 56.86%; 2022: 56.75%; 2021: 59.52%). Speaking up about concerns 60.29% of staff said they feel safe to speak up about anything that concerns them in their organisation (2024: 61.83%; 2023: 62.35%; 2022: 61.54%; 2021: 62.08%). 47.59% of staff said they were confident that their organisation would address their concern (2024: 49.51%; 2023: 50.06%; 2022: 48.66%; 2021: 49.77%). Care for patients and service users 71.78% of staff said that care of patients or service users is their organisation's top priority (2024: 74.37%; 2023: 75.14%; 2022: 74.05%; 2021: 75.62%). 69.18% of staff agree that their organisation acts on concerns raised by patients or services users (2024: 70.90%; 2023: 70.62%; 2022: 69.15%; 2021: 72.10%) Workload and resources 46.51% of staff said they are able to meet all the conflicting demands on their time at work (2024: 47.20%; 2023: 46.53%; 2022: 42.79%; 2021: 42.85%). 56.06% of staff said they have adequate materials, supplies and equipment to do their work (2024: 58.01%; 2023: 58.33%; 2022: 55.45%; 2021: 57.15%). 32.82% of staff said there are enough staff at their organisation for them to do their job properly (2024: 33.98%; 2023: 32.24%; 2022: 26.21%; 2021: 26.89%).- Posted
-
- Staff safety
- Staff support
- (and 8 more)
-
Content Article
More than two years after the Hughes Report was published, the UK Government has yet to provide a clear timeline for implementing a compensation scheme for the thousands of patients harmed by pelvic mesh and valproate. Published in February 2024 by the Patient Safety Commissioner for England, Professor Henrietta Hughes, the report examined options for redress for patients and families affected by these interventions. In this letter to the Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Professor Hughes urges him to ensure that a clear timetable is set and that financial redress is delivered without further delay.- Posted
-
- Redress
- Patient harmed
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
On the 23 June 2025 the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care announced a rapid, national, independent investigation into NHS maternity and neonatal services. This interim report reflects what families, staff and others have told the investigation team and what the latter has seen themselves. Women and families across England are still being asked to share their experiences of maternity and neonatal care through a public call for evidence which is open until the 17 March 2026. In the report’s foreword, Baroness Amos notes that the experiences described by women and people who have been pregnant, families and non-birthing partners in their December report have remained as consistent themes during our meetings across the country. She states that the investigation team have heard about families being disregarded and not listened to during pregnancy and labour, a lack of kindness and compassion, and reluctance on the part of trusts and professionals to admit mistakes and say sorry when things have gone wrong. This report seeks to set out the background and changing context in which maternity and neonatal care is provided. It also examines six factors that could be contributing to pressures on the maternity and neonatal system: Capacity pressures – the investigation have heard about capacity pressures at every stage of the maternity journey. They have also identified inconsistencies between individual units and in the birth choices available to women, sometimes as a result of these capacity pressures. Culture and leadership – the investigation have heard from many families of striking shortcomings relating to organisational culture, and they heard from staff of the challenges they face in sustaining and improving a compassionate culture. Racism and discrimination – throughout their investigation, they have heard about unacceptable racism and discrimination across the maternity and neonatal system. Poor responses and lack of accountability when things go wrong – families have described a lack of compassion in the aftermath of incidents that had resulted in harm, including birth trauma and baby loss. The investigation have repeatedly heard from women and families about a lack of transparency, clear communication and learning when things went wrong. The quality of estates - from their visits to the 12 NHS trusts, the investigation has seen maternity and neonatal services that are delivered in estates that are outdated and dilapidated, and estates which are new and modern. However, the report notes that a modern estate does not always equate to a high-quality service, for example, they have also seen examples of recently built estates which were misaligned with clinical and patient need. Workforce – the report notes that even in NHS trusts that have achieved full staffing according to Birthrate Plus, staff report that maternity units do not consistently feel safely staffed in practice, due to factors such as high turnover of staff and because the numbers include midwives who do not provide frontline care. They state that some women and families recognised that staff are often working beyond capacity and that staffing levels impact on the quality of care provided.- Posted
-
- Obstetrics and gynaecology/ Maternity
- Maternity
- (and 5 more)
-
Content Article
In this blog Paul Galdas, Professor of Men's Health at University of York, reflects on the implementation of the Men's Health Strategy for England. He argues that if the strategy is to make a difference, its impact will depend less on changing men’s behaviour and more on how health systems are designed to respond, particularly for those experiencing intersecting disadvantage. -
Content Article
In 2025 the Department of Health in Northern Ireland held a consultation on the introduction of a new Regional Framework for Learning and Improvement from Patient Safety Incidents to replace the existing Serious Adverse Incident Procedure. This report provides an analysis and summary of the comments made in response to each consultation question. It also covers comments and views shared during consultation events and those in formal consultation response submissions to the Department of Health. Summarising the responses received as part of this consultation, the report states that overall there was strong support for the strategic direction set out in the consultation. It notes that respondents endorsed the proposals as a significant step towards fostering a culture that prioritises openness and learning to improve patient safety and the delivery and quality of care. It advises that the Department will now take time to consider the responses in further detail and will work with partners to consider additions, amendments and refinements that are required to the strategic proposals. This will include ensuring alignment with the implementation of other ongoing policy development in this area including, for example, the Being Open Framework. The report concludes by stating that once considered and approved by the Minister, publication of the Framework, Standards, and Principles will establish the agreed strategic governing framework for learning and improvement from Patient Safety Incidents. A managed transition and implementation phase is anticipated to begin in early 2026. It notes that the Department will keep interested parties informed about future developments relating to the new strategic approach and its implementation.- Posted
-
- Patient safety incident
- Investigation
- (and 2 more)
-
Content Article
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) regulates medicines, medical devices and blood components for transfusion in the UK. This roundup provides a summary of their latest safety advice for medicines and medical device users. It includes details of medicine recalls, medical device field safety notices and details of how to report drug reactions and device incidents. This month's Safety Roundup includes: Drug Safety Update on Falsified Mounjaro KwikPen 15mg pre-filled pens Drug Safety Update on Semaglutide (Wegovy, Ozempic and Rybelsus): risk of Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) Drug Safety Update on IXCHIQ Chikungunya vaccine: updates to restrictions of use following safety review Drug Safety Update on GLP-1 receptor agonists and dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists: strengthened warnings on acute pancreatitis, including necrotising and fatal cases Letters, medicines recalls and device notifications sent to healthcare professionals in February 2026 News and guidance on: UKHSA and MHRA issue reminder to healthcare professionals regarding use of non-sterile alcohol-free wipes Updates to instructions for use (IFUs) of Cardinal Health Chest Drainage Units & accessories Respiratory tube connector: risk of patient harm due to manufacturing defect Medical devices regulations: targeted consultation on the indefinite recognition of CE marked devices- Posted
-
- Medication
- Medical device
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
Nearly all NHS trusts across England are failing to meet a crucial cancer treatment target, with some of the poorest performing trusts only managing to treat around half of their patients within the stipulated timeframe. New data reveals significant disparities between trusts, with some individuals enduring waits exceeding 104 days. The long-established NHS benchmark mandates that 85 per cent of cancer patients should commence treatment within 62 days of their referral. However, this national target has not been achieved since 2014. In response to the ongoing challenges, the government has set an interim goal for this figure to reach 75 per cent by March 2026. The new analysis of NHS England figures shows just three of 119 acute trusts with comparable data hit or surpassed the 85% target last year, while only around a quarter made it above 75%. Read full article. Source: The Independent, 25 February 2026- Posted
-
- Cancer
- Long waiting list
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with: