Jump to content
  • Posts

    1,180
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Mark Hughes

Members

Everything posted by Mark Hughes

  1. Content Article
    Listening to the voices of workers is essential for a safe and effective healthcare for workers, patients and the public. Freedom to Speak Up Guardians provide an opportunity for organisations to learn from these voices which may not otherwise be heard. Freedom to Speak Up Guardians are required to report non-identifiable information on the cases they receive both locally to their boards and senior leadership and to the National Guardian’s Office. This report summarises the data shared by Guardians about the speaking up cases they received between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024. There were 32,167 cases raised with Freedom to Speak Up Guardians in 2023/2024. This is the highest number of cases recorded, a 27.6% increase from 2022/23. Other key headlines from this report include: 18.7% of cases raised included an element of patient safety/quality (a marginal drop compared to 19.4% in 2022/23). 19.8% of cases reported included an element of bullying or harassment (a 2-percentage point fall compared to 2022/23). One in every three cases raised (32.3%) involved an element of worker safety or wellbeing (an increase from one in every four cases in 2022/23). Two in every five cases (38.5%) involved an element of inappropriate behaviours or attitudes. 9.5% of cases were raised anonymously. Detriment for speaking up was indicated in 4% of cases (the same as in 2022/23). Related reading Patient Safety Learning, We are not getting safer: Patient safety and the NHS staff survey results, 26 March 2024.
  2. Content Article
    Safety is a core dimension of health care quality, and measurement of patient safety culture in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries is increasingly conducted as part of efforts to monitor patient safety and to contribute to health system performance assessment. This Health Working Paper looks at the findings of the second OECD pilot on patient safety culture. This occurred in 2022-2023 and in total took data from 648,209 health care providers from 14 countries. A positive patient safety culture is associated with several benefits, including better health outcomes and patient experiences, as well as improved organisational productivity and staff satisfaction and retention. Looking at patient safety culture in OECD countries, this report builds on a previous analysis of patient safety culture measurement and the findings of the first OECD pilot data collection on patient safety culture in 2020-2021. Key findings from this include: The domain of staffing and work pace (that there are enough staff to handle the workload, staff work appropriate hours and do not feel rushed, and there is appropriate reliance on temporary or float staff) remains the lowest scoring domain on average for countries. Less than half of respondents felt that there were safe staffing and work pace levels in their work environment there remains high levels of perceived punitive response to error in hospital work environments. The highest scoring domains related to interpersonal relationships in the workplace. These were teamwork and supervisor, manager, or clinical leader support for patient safety. There remains significant international variation in the performance across countries. Several domains— including, response to error, handoffs and information exchange, and organizational learning—continuous improvement—had an over 20 percentage point difference between the best and worst performing countries. Following two successful pilot data collection efforts to assess the feasibility of collecting and reporting data on patient safety culture, the OECD will now begin to collect Patient Safety Culture indicators as part of its core data collection to provide insights on the state of patient safety among OECD countries.
  3. Content Article
    On the 30 May 2024, the World Health Organization published the its Global Patient Safety Report 2024. In this blog, Assistant Professor John Tingle from Birmingham Law School at the University of Birmingham, reflects on the findings of this report, in particular considering progress made in nurturing patient safety cultures in different healthcare systems.
  4. Content Article
    This is the recording of a webinar on hosted by the Safety for All Campaign to present findings from a survey on violence and aggression sustained by nursing and midwifery students in a UK university. The findings were presented by Dr Kevin Hambridge, Lecturer in Adult Nursing (Education), Francis Thompson, Associate Professor in Mental Health Nursing (Education) and Dr Matt Carey, Associate Professor in Child Health Nursing – Acute Care, all from the University of Plymouth. The results highlighted worrying trends of verbal violence or aggression, physical violence and sexual violence towards students. The responses also highlighted a culture of acceptance among students who have been programmed to see violence at work as part of the job. There was a detailed question and answer session following the presentation in which webinar attendees asked questions about prevention, protection and collaboration.  
  5. Event
    until
    Taking place on Tuesday 10th December 2024 at the Royal College of Physicians in London, the third annual Safety For All conference provides an opportunity to hear from the nation’s leading voices in healthcare worker safety and patient safety and to network with frontline healthcare workers, unions, key decision makers in public and private healthcare, and patients. This event is hosted by the Safer Healthcare and Biosafety Network and Patient Safety Learning as part of the Safety For All campaign. Launched in 2021, the Safety For All campaign is focused on driving improvements in and between healthcare worker safety and patient safety, highlighting how poor staff safety standards and practice impact adversely on patient safety and vice versa. It is championing the need for a systematic and integrated approach to improve safety practice for staff and patients across health and social care so that the sum is greater than the parts. The conference will be hosted by Dr Rob Galloway, A&E Consultant at Brighton and Sussex Hospital NHS Trust, and regular columnist in the Daily Mail, and with keynote speakers including the CEO of the Royal College of Nursing, and Professor Charlotte McArdle, Deputy Chief Nursing Officer for Patient Safety and Improvement, NHS England. Sessions include; Sustainability Mental health Violence at work Antimicrobial resistance Implementing the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) Register here.
  6. Event
    until
    Clinical communications and data sharing should focus both on the needs of patients and staff and safety to turn insights into better patient care. With the demands of patients greater than ever before, the demands placed on clinical staff have only increased in all areas of healthcare. Care teams need to work smarter with a quick and coordinated response to patient incidents by communicating critical notifications and other clinical and operational systems to the right care team members, enhance communication and simplify workflow throughout the process. This Safety For All webinar will delve into the transformative journey undertaken by South Eastern Health & Social Care Trust and the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital to enhance clinical communications. Attendees will learn about the strategies and innovations implemented by these institutions to improve the clinical workflows, efficiency, effectiveness, and improving clinical quality using their clinical communication system. The session will cover key lessons learned, best practices, and the tangible benefits achieved through their efforts. Join us to gain valuable insights into how these leading healthcare organisations have successfully navigated their path to excellence in clinical communications. Register here.
  7. Content Article
    In its manifesto ahead of the 2024 UK general election, the NHS Race & Health Observatory calls for a unification of efforts towards eradicating racial and ethnic health disparities in the nation’s healthcare system. The seven-point manifesto highlights: Prioritising maternal and neonatal health equity to reduce preventable related deaths. Accelerating mental health equity of access, experience and outcomes through reforms, including proceeding at pace with reform of the Mental Health Act. Empowering leadership and enhancing accountability for equity among patients and workforce. Ensuring meaningful community-centric engagement in policy development. Integrating co-benefits of health equity and wellbeing into policy advocacy. Strengthening evidence-informed approaches by prioritising inclusivity in data. Position the UK as a global leader on health equity research, innovation and impact.
  8. News Article
    One in five recent inspections of maternity services have raised concerns over “essential” breathing equipment for newborn babies, HSJ has found. Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspectors have flagged fears over shortages and overdue maintenance of resuscitaire, a device commonly used by midwives if babies require additional support with breathing. Experts say the equipment should be immediately available to ensure safe resuscitation. The CQC itself said the lack of such equipment was impacting patient safety at some hospitals. Read the full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 31 May 2024
  9. Content Article
    The first ever World Health Organization (WHO) global report on patient safety aims to provide a foundational understanding of the current state of patient safety across the world, aligned with the Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021-2030. It contains insights and information beneficial to health care professionals, policy-makers, patients and patient safety advocates, researchers – essentially anyone involved or interested in the improvement of health care and patient safety globally. In this report, the WHO initially sets out the burden of harm to patients, noting the following key messages: Unsafe care is a significant global public health issue, with more than one in ten patients experiencing harm in medical care settings – half of which could be preventable – leading to millions of deaths and substantial economic costs annually. The burden of unsafe care disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries, where the majority of patient harm and associated deaths occur. Vulnerable populations, including older adults, children and ethnic minorities, face higher risks of patient harm, highlighting the importance of tailored interventions for safety of these groups within health care systems. Globally, 1 in 20 patients suffer from preventable medication harm, highlighting a significant challenge across health care systems. Specifically, over half (53%) of this harm arises at the prescribing stage, pointing to a crucial need for improving medication safety practices. Highly specialized care settings, such as intensive care, emergency and surgical units, are associated with the highest rates of patient harm, including both overall harm and preventable harm. In primary care, an estimated 7% of patients experience harm. It also summarises the financial and economic burden of unsafe care, noting the following key messages: Unsafe care significantly burdens health care budgets, consuming up to 12.6% of total health expenditure in high-income countries, translating into approximately $878 billion annually. Patient harm’s financial impact varies by setting: in acute care, complications inflate costs; in primary care, adverse drug events and misdiagnoses lead to unnecessary hospital use; and in long-term care, conditions such as pressure ulcers add significant expenses, showing the broad economic effects of unsafe care. Patient harm significantly reduces productivity and increases income loss, imposing indirect costs on economies that can surpass direct health care costs. Improving patient safety could have profound economic benefits, potentially increasing global economic output by 15% over two decades. The global willingness to invest in preventing patient harm, potentially averting US$1.17 trillion annually in costs, underscores the strong rationale for health care systems to prioritize patient safety. Effective patient safety interventions, such as the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs), offer high returns on investment, demonstrating that targeted efforts to improve care safety are not only medically beneficial but also economically wise. The report then takes a global overview of patient safety initiatives and progress made around the world, looking at this against each of the strategic objectives set out in the Global Patient Safety Action Plan: Policies to eliminate avoidable harm in health care High-reliability systems Safety of clinical processes Patient and family engagement Health worker education, skills and safety Information, research and risk management Synergy, partnerships and solidarity The infographic below provides a high level summary of progress made against core indicators in the Global Patient Safety Action Plan (these percentages refer only to the 108 countries that completed the corresponding survey).
  10. Content Article
    In this joint statement, National Voices, The Richmond Group of Charities and 68 other health and social care organisations are calling on the Department of Health and Social Care to pause or extend the consultation process for the 10-year review of the NHS Constitution, ensuring that everyone is able to respond. Patient Safety Learning is one of the signatories of this statement.
  11. Content Article
    An investigation published by BBC News has revealed that Electronic patient record (EPR) system failures have been linked to the death of three patients and more than 100 instances of serious harm at NHS hospitals trusts in England. In this short blog, Patient Safety Learning reflects of these issues and the importance of patient safety being at the heart of the development and implementation of EPRs. EPR systems are a way of managing clinical information with the intention of making this information more easily accessible for use by healthcare professionals. In A plan for digital health and social care published in June 2022, the Department of Health and Social Care set a target that all NHS Trusts should have an EPR system by March 2025.[1] In November last year, NHS England announced it was on course to meet this target, stating that 90% of NHS trusts have now introduced these new systems.[2] When implemented safely, EPRs can support and improve care and treatment by: Enabling staff to have a complete overview of patients’ care in real time. Removing the need for patients to have to share the same information multiple times. Freeing up healthcare professional time and resources. However, there are also a number of patient safety risks associated with their implementation and use, as highlighted in a blog by our Chief Digital Officer Clive Flashman in January.[3] In their investigation, BBC News found from a Freedom of Information (FOI) request sent to all acute hospital trusts in England (of which 116 responded) that:[4] 89 trusts confirmed they monitored and logged instances when patients could be harmed as a result of problems with their EPR systems. almost half recorded instances of potential patient harm linked to their systems. nearly 60 trusts reported IT problems that could affect patient care. more than 200,000 letters were not sent across 21 trusts. there were 126 instances of serious harm linked to IT issues, across 31 trusts. and three deaths across two trusts related to EPR problems. Commenting the findings of this FOI request, our Chief Digital Officer Clive Flashman said: “Poor implementations of EPR systems can lead to direct and indirect harm to patients. Often this is not associated with the IT system and goes unreported, so we have no data to show the true scale of the issue. We need more transparency in reporting and sharing knowledge so we can avoid patient safety problems and harm. This is a priority issue that must be addressed by those leading EPR implementations.” At Patient Safety Learning we believe that patient safety needs to be a core purpose of health and social care. Patient safety considerations need to be embedded through each stage of the process when organisations introduce EPRs: Development – patient safety must be at the heart of the initial creation and development of EPR systems. Consideration should be given to interoperability (the ability to work with other computer systems or software used by the organisation to exchange and make use of information). Rollout – it is vital as EPRs are introduced into organisations that the appropriate training is provided to staff. There also needs to be sufficient usability testing (testing how easy these systems are to use with a group of staff who will ordinarily be using them). Implementation – once an EPR is in place, monitoring how these are operating in practice and learning and acting on any incidents or near misses that take place relating to this. Reflecting on this, our Chief Executive Helen Hughes said: “We must invest in proper implementation so that the benefits of EPRs and health technology are realised and do not lead to avoidable and unintentional harm. Actively involving healthcare professionals is essential to ensure we are designing for safety in often very complex workflow processes, so we better understand and respond to risks and manage the mitigations.” References Department of Health and Social Care. A plan for digital health and social care; 29 June 2022. NHS Digital, 90% of NHS trusts now have electronic patient records; 16 November 2023. Clive Flashman, NHS England warns electronic patient records could pose ‘serious risks to patient safety’: what can we learn?, 10 January 2024. BBC News, NHS computer issues linked to patient harm, 30 May 2024.
  12. News Article
    IT system failures have been linked to the deaths of three patients and more than 100 instances of serious harm at NHS hospital trusts in England, BBC News has found. A Freedom of Information request also found 200,000 medical letters had gone unsent due to widespread problems with NHS computer systems. Nearly half of hospital trusts with electronic patient systems reported issues that could affect patients. NHS England says it has invested £900m over the past two years to help introduce new and improved systems. Some hospital trusts have spent hundreds of millions of pounds on new electronic patient record (EPR) systems, but BBC News has discovered many are experiencing major problems with how they work. Quoted in this article, Clive Flashman, Chief Digital Officer of Patient Safety Learning, said, “If you look at the sorts of serious issues that are coming out around the country where patients are being harmed, in some cases dying, as a result of these systems not working properly, I would imagine there are tens of thousands of these that are happening that probably never get discussed”. Read the full story. Source: BBC News, 30 May 2024 Read more about Patient Safety Learning's reflections on these issues and the importance of patient safety being at the heart of the development and implementation of EPRs here.
  13. Content Article
    This systematic literature review looks at the international evidence on how interventions to improve safety culture may benefit hospital staff and how they can be designed and implemented. In its conclusion, the authors note that the impact of safety culture interventions on staff outcomes, evidence on staff experiences is scarce. They suggested that a greater focus on staff outcomes would provide more meaningful insight into staff experience within safety culture and results from the safety culture.
  14. Content Article
    In this article, Sharon Hartles looks at the ongoing fight for justice by families affected by the hormone pregnancy test (HPT) Primodos. She discusses the impact of new evidence and advocacy efforts, highlighting the resilience of those involved in the quest for accountability. She also considers the absence of consideration of patients and family members affected by HPTs from the recent Hughes Report, which looked at redress options for the other two medical interventions covered by the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review. Sharon Hartles is a member of the Harm and Evidence Research Collaborative at the Open University. Additionally, she is affiliated with the Risky Hormones research project, an international collaboration in partnership with patient groups. You can read the blog here. Related reading First Do No Harm. The report of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review (8 July 2020) The Hughes Report: Options for redress for those harmed by valproate and pelvic mesh (Patient Safety Commissioner for England, 7 February 2024) Reflections on The Hughes Report: Pelvic mesh, sodium valproate, hormone pregnancy tests and options for redress (a blog from Patient Safety Learning) A Bitter Pill: Primodos, The Forgotten Thalidomide (APPG on Hormone Pregnancy Tests, 27 February 2024) Patient Safety Spotlight interview with Marie Lyon, chair of the Association for Children Damaged by Hormone Pregnancy Tests
  15. Event
    until
    The first ever World Health Organization (WHO) Global Report on Patient Safety will provide a comprehensive overview of patient safety measures globally, aligned with the Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030. It will include detailed analyses and summaries that highlight the burden of unsafe care and the strategies different countries are using to improve safety in health care. This WHO webinar will mark the launch of this report. Register here. agenda_global-patient-safety-report-2024-launch-webinar.pdf flyer_launch-event-global-patient-safety-report-2024.pdf
  16. Content Article
    In January 2024, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Lucian Leape Institute convened an expert panel to explore the promise and potential risks for patient safety from generative artificial intelligence (genAI). This report is based on the expert panel’s review and discussion. This report summarises three user cases that highlight areas where genAI could significantly impact patient safety: Documentation support – including developing patient history summaries, supporting patient record reconciliation (including medication reconciliation), ambient recording of patient-clinician conversations, and drafting documentation. Clinical decision support - including providing diagnostic support and recommendations, offering early detection or warning on changes to patient condition, and developing potential treatment plans. Patient-facing chatbots - including acting as a data collector to support triage, interacting with patients and responding to their questions and concerns, and supporting care navigation. The report provides a detailed review of mitigation and monitoring strategies and expert panel recommendations; and an appraisal of the implications of genAI for the patient safety field. The expert panel's recommendations are: Serve and safeguard the patient. Disclose and explain the use of patient-facing AI-based tools to patients. Learn with, engage, and listen to clinicians. Equip clinicians with general knowledge on genAI and related ethical issues, as well as specific instruction on how to use available AI-based tools. Evaluate and ensure AI efficacy and freedom from bias. Establish an evidence base of rigorously tested and validated AI-based tools, including the results of their use in real-life clinical situations. Establish strict AI governance, oversight, and guidance both for individual health delivery systems and the federal government. Be intentional with the design, implementation, and ongoing evaluation of AI tools. Follow human-centered design principles, actively engage end users in all phases of design, and validate models and tools with small-scale tests of real-world clinical uses. Engage in collaborative learning across health care systems.
  17. Content Article
    This investigation by the Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) considers how patient safety can be improved in relation to children and young people with mental health needs while they stay on an acute paediatric ward—a ward for children and young people in a hospital that typically treats physical health conditions. It focuses on the risk factors associated with the design of these wards in acute hospitals. Findings of this report included: There was limited national guidance about how paediatric wards should be adapted for children and young people with mental health needs. Paediatric wards in acute hospitals tended to focus on adapting their environments to improve the physical safety of a room for children and young people with a mental health need. Rooms would be stripped of items deemed to be a risk. Evidence indicated that removing items and creating a more restrictive environment can create more conflict situations including increased aggression, physical and verbal abuse, rule breaking, medication refusal, leaving the hospital without permission (absconding), and self-harm. There are opportunities to better support children and young people on acute paediatric wards by improving the environment to support therapeutic care and patient safety. Evaluating the learning from innovations and adaptations that individual hospitals around the country have made to their acute paediatric wards for children and young people with mental health needs can improve patient safety. There is a gap in the communication, escalation and management and oversight of risks associated with the acute paediatric ward environment for children and young people with mental health needs. In this report HSSIB makes the following safety recommendations: NHS England, in collaboration with key stakeholders, including young people with lived experience and their families, develops guidance on how acute paediatric wards could be adapted to support children and young people with mental health needs. This work should focus on improving the therapeutic environment. NHS England, in collaboration with key stakeholders, updates ‘Health Building Note 23: Hospital accommodation for children and young people’ to include the therapeutic environment for supporting children and young people with mental health needs. The Care Quality Commission uses the findings of this report to ensure healthcare providers and integrated care boards implement a robust way for risks associated with the adaptations made to acute paediatric wards to be escalated and managed. It also proposes the following safety response for integrated care boards and healthcare providers: HSSIB suggests that integrated care boards work in collaboration with healthcare providers to implement a robust way for risks associated with the adaptations made to acute paediatric wards to be understood, escalated and managed to ensure that adaptations enhance patient safety.
  18. Content Article
    This qualitative study looked at healthcare professionals perceptions of patient safety culture in Ghana. It was conducted with 42 healthcare professionals in two regional government hospitals in Ghana from March to June 2022. The authors note that despite positive attitudes and knowledge of patient safety, healthcare professionals expressed concerns about the implementation of patient safety policies outlined by hospitals. They also highlighted that there was a perception that curriculum training on patient safety during school education and the availability of dedicated officers for patient safety at their facilities may help improve patient safety.
  19. Content Article
    This is the transcript of a statement in the House of Commons by the Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General, John Glen MP, in response to the publication of the final report of the Infected Blood Inquiry. He sets out plans for a proposed scheme to provide compensation to those infected and affected by this scandal. This was followed by comments from other members of the House of Commons. Following the Prime Minister’s statement to the House of Commons on the Infected Blood Inquiry, in this statement the Minister set out in further detail the comprehensive compensation scheme referenced in the Prime Minister’s statement. He stated that those who have been directly or indirectly infected by NHS blood, blood products or tissue contaminated with HIV or hepatitis C, or have developed a chronic infection from blood contaminated with hepatitis B, will be eligible to claim compensation under the scheme, and where an infected person has died but would have been eligible under those criteria, compensation will be paid to their estate. This will include where a person was infected with hepatitis B and died during the acute period of infection. He also noted that the Government will: establish the Infected Blood Compensation Authority—an arm’s length body—to administer the scheme. Sir Robert Francis will be appointed as the interim chair of the organisation. ensure that anyone already registered with one of the existing infected blood support schemes will automatically be considered eligible for compensation. make extra interim payments of £210,000 over the summer to living infected beneficiaries—those registered with existing infected blood support schemes as well as those who register with a support scheme before the final scheme becomes operational—and to the estates of those who pass away between now and payments being made.
  20. Content Article
    This is the transcript of a statement in the House of Commons by the Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak MP, in response to the publication of the final report of the Infected Blood Inquiry. He apologises for the failure in blood policy and blood products, the repeated failure of the state and medical professionals to recognise the harm caused by this and for the institutional refusal to face up to these failings. He also says that the Government will pay comprehensive compensation to those infected and affected by this scandal. This statement is followed by a response from the Leader of the Opposition, Sir Keir Starmer MP, and comments from other members of the House of Commons.
  21. Content Article
    In 2021, the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety review, led by Baroness Cumberlege, conducted a comprehensive review of historic documents and found that Hormone Pregnancy Tests had caused avoidable harm, that they should have been withdrawn by the regulator after the first warnings in 1967 and that this failure to act meant that women were exposed unnecessarily to a potential risk. This report by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Hormone Pregnancy Tests sets out the background to this and considers the findings in 2017 of an expert working group that was relied upon by the Government and manufacturers to strike out a claim for compensation in 2023. The report recommends that the Government sets up an independent review to examine the findings of this working group. The report calls on the Secretary of State to implement the following recommendations: (a) To set up an independent review to examine the findings of the ‘Expert Working Group’: Appointed scientists must have a background in, and detailed understanding of this technical area. Any selection and appointment of experts must be independent and in consultation with the families affected by Primodos to ensure they have trust and confidence in the process. As set out in the IMMDS review, this must be independent of the MHRA which has taken a defensive approach to this issue. Where it is necessary to peer-review the draft report, this should be reviewed by an independent panel of experts to avoid the potential of undue influence. (b) To review the compelling new evidence published in the ‘Reproductive Toxicology’ journal as set out in chapter 6. Related reading Patient Safety Spotlight interview with Marie Lyon, chair of the Association for Children Damaged by Hormone Pregnancy Tests
  22. Content Article
    This cross-sectional study, published in Cureus, was conducted among 423 nurses working at tertiary care hospitals in the Al-Jouf region in Saudi Arabia. The authors note that participants valued the aspects of teamwork within units, organisational learning-continuous improvement, and overall perceptions of patient safety as areas of strength and important elements of patient safety culture. However, they also highlighted areas of concern that need improvement, such as nonpunitive response to errors, handoffs and transitions, communication openness, staffing, and frequency of events reported.
  23. Content Article
    In vitro diagnostic (IVD) devices are used to examine samples taken from the human body and to diagnose and monitor health conditions. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) are seeking views on a new policy would require manufacturers to comply with additional measures for certain high risk IVDs, such as blood tests used to identify blood type before transfusions or tests which identify life-threatening diseases, introducing harmonised requirements for these products. The consultation closes at 11.59pm on 14 June 2024.
  24. Content Article
    Although much of the national press coverage of healthcare in the UK often focuses on the impact of delayed discharges from hospitals, ineffective discharge from mental health settings can lead to higher levels of patient readmission. In this blog CJ Nwasike looks at how discharge without support exacerbates pressure on community mental health services and can risk readmission.
  25. Content Article
    The Thirlwall Inquiry is examining events at the Countess of Chester Hospital and their implications following the trial, and subsequent convictions, of former neonatal nurse Lucy Letby of murder and attempted murder of babies at the hospital. As part of this Inquiry, its Terms of Reference asks: “Whether recommendations to address culture and governance issues made by previous inquiries into the NHS have been implemented into wider NHS practice? To what effect?”. To help inform its work in this area, the Inquiry Legal Team has produced this Table of Inquiries and reviews which have been conducted in England and Wales over the last thirty years. Recommendations from each Inquiry have been set out in a comprehensive table, alongside details of whether or not those recommendations have been implemented.
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.