Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Productivity'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Digital health and care service provision
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Apps for health and care
    • Teleservices
    • Other health and care software
    • Digital health regulatory bodies/standards/guidance
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Patient Safety Alerts
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Transformative Simulation
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • Patient Safety Standards
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


First name


Last name


Country


About me


Organisation


Role

Found 54 results
  1. Content Article
    Productivity is a polarising term in the NHS. In a stretched system, it carries unwelcome connotations of being asked to do more work with the same – or fewer – resources. It is unsurprising, then, that the productivity ‘agenda’ is viewed with caution, even resentment; as something imposed on the service rather than shaped by those who deliver and use it.  This blog presents an overview of the results of a recent public call for evidence from The Health Foundation as part of the NHS Productivity Commission, in which a wide range of stakeholders were invited to share their insights, ideas and expertise on the challenge of productivity in the NHS in England and how it could be tackled.  Key insights gained covered the following areas: Measuring productivity and defining value: How productivity is measured was considered of key importance as well as defining a shared system-wide priority for the health service. Ideas for change from the frontline: Ideas were presented for how productivity could be owned and improved from the frontline, to enhance job quality and retention. System and organisational capabilities: Many respondents spoke about the cultural changes and system capabilities needed for a more productive NHS.  The next steps are proposed in which the insights gained from this call for evidence, along with wider research and stakeholder engagement will be drawn upon to develop a series of policy options papers and an overarching roadmap.
  2. Content Article
    On 25 February 2026, healthcare leaders and stakeholders gathered in London for the Patient Safety Forum, organised by Public Policy Projects (PPP) in partnership with Patient Safety Learning. Panellists at this event investigated multifaceted impacts patient safety measures are having on wider system operations. From avoiding duplicated processes and failure demand, to cross-disciplinary learning and efficiency gains, this blog summarises discussions from two panels which highlighted the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework and productivity as focuses for a reforming healthcare system. Read the full article from PPP via the link below.
  3. Content Article
    This webinar was part of a series of evidence events hosted by the Health Foundation's NHS Productivity Commission. The NHS Productivity Commission has been established with the aim of providing evidence and solutions to boost NHS productivity growth over the next decade. The Commission is drawing on experience and insights from the NHS, the wider economy and health systems in other countries.   In this event we hear from an expert panel about what we can learn from international evidence and best practice. 
  4. Event
    until
    This webinar is part of a series of evidence events hosted by the Health Foundation's NHS Productivity Commission. The NHS Productivity Commission has been established with the aim of providing evidence and solutions to boost NHS productivity growth over the next decade. The Commission is drawing on experience and insights from the NHS, the wider economy and health systems in other countries. In this event we will hear from an expert panel about what we can learn from international evidence and best practice. There will be an opportunity for Q&A. Register
  5. Content Article
    In this blog Fredrik Matre considers the connection between patient safety and productivity, challenging the assumption that safety measures block productivity improvements. He makes the case for putting safety at the core of productivity planning. This blog has been published ahead of the Patient Safety Forum 2026, an event jointly hosted by Public Policy Projects and Patient Safety Learning, which features a panel session on “Aligning patient safety with productivity”.
  6. Content Article
    This blog highlights confusion and anxiety among NHS staff following the rollout of Microsoft Copilot, which many learned about only after gaining access. In the first part, a Patient Safety Manager describes their panic on discovering that Copilot could see confidential files, with little guidance provided to them on what is safe or permitted. They felt NHS advice was vague and risk-shifting, leaving staff uncertain and exposed. Patient Safety Learning's Chief Digital Officer, Clive Flashman invited wider engagement on the issue, revealing inconsistent rollouts across Trusts and a lack of clear, practical support. A LinkedIn discussion drew major attention, prompting resource sharing and calls for stronger national coordination, clearer rules, and better training to ensure safe, confident use of AI tools. In the second part of this blog, Clive offers his insights on these issues, reflects on the wider response and shares some useful links. The senior patient safety manager who shared their concerns with Patient Safety Learning has chosen to remain anonymous, but has given their permission for us to publish their first person reflections. Last week, an email landed in my inbox from “the NHS” announcing that Copilot had officially launched — and that it was free for all NHS staff to use. I’ll admit, I was curious and a bit excited. We hear a lot about AI transforming healthcare, and if there’s something that could make our paperwork lighter and free up more time for patients, I’m all for it. But then reality set in. I clicked the link, logged in with my NHS email, and suddenly there it was: everything. Our shared documents, HR folders, Duty of Candour letters, meeting notes, even files that contained sensitive patient information. My first reaction wasn’t amazement — it was panic. Had I just exposed confidential NHS data to the internet? Was this even allowed? I shut it down immediately and emailed our Information Governance (IG) team. The response I received said: “The NHS uses Copilot for administrative and support tasks, such as drafting emails, summarising meetings, and creating documents in Microsoft 365 applications, to free up staff time for patient care. No patient or staff data should ever be included in Copilot. Staff will be responsible if they choose to input patient or staff information into Copilot.” Reading that, it almost sounded as if the reply had been written by Copilot itself — formal, factual, but not particularly helpful. I still didn’t know what I could safely do on it, or how it might genuinely help me in my day-to-day work. From a front-line perspective, this rollout has felt confusing. We’re constantly reminded about data security and confidentiality — now we’re being handed a tool that seems to see everything, with no real explanation of how it works, what’s off-limits, or how to use it effectively. I can see the potential. If Copilot can really help summarise meetings, draft letters, or tidy up reports, that could save precious hours. But right now, without clear NHS-specific training or guidance, it feels risky to experiment. What staff like me need is practical direction, not just reassurances. We need: Clear, accessible rules about what can and can’t be entered. Examples of everyday, safe tasks Copilot can genuinely help with. Transparency about where the data lives and how it’s protected. Real-world demos showing how it supports our roles — clinical, admin, or managerial. Until then, many of us will continue to tread carefully — not because we fear new technology, but because we understand how critical it is to protect patient data. Feeling alone and uncertain about where to turn, I reached out to Patient Safety Learning — an organisation I trust to listen and take my concerns seriously. If Copilot is meant to help us fly, someone needs to show us where the cockpit is. Patient Safety Learning's response (Clive Flashman, Chief Digital Officer) The first thing I did was reach out to some other NHS frontline staff at other organisations to ask how the rollout of CoPilot had been done at their organisations. Every rollout described was from my perspective, ‘sub-optimal’. My response to the Patient Safety Manager was along the lines of “essentially, your documents are all held in the MS cloud (Azure) and CoPilot is a search/ assistant tool residing in the same space. No information is leaving the MS cloud and it shouldn’t change the role-based access controls that determine what you and others can and can’t see within it.” So, I was able to reassure the Patient Safety Manager that there shouldn’t be an Information Governance issue that should be of concern to them. However, what about the clinical data that CoPilot enables the manager to review? This could include legitimate folders and documents containing things like: complete and draft investigations and reviews into patient safety incidents complaints correspondence and reports coroner’s inquest investigations and submissions to court reports to Trust Quality & Safety Committees and Board reports Many, if not all of these, would contain sensitive patient and staff information. This was at odds with the Trust’s response of "no patient or staff data should ever be included in Copilot. Staff will be responsible if they choose to input patient or staff information into Copilot." Understandably the Patient Safety Manager was concerned that they hadn’t been given any guidance on the use of such data. They felt concerned and vulnerable that using CoPilot to help with administrative efficiency for their role could be personally compromising. This felt a very blaming approach, ‘you get it wrong, and you’re culpable.’ I wasn’t sure who would be able to guide me best on this, so we decided that we’d connect with the NHS hive mind and I wrote a LinkedIn post about this. The post highlighted that more needed to be done to support NHS staff in understanding and using CoPilot – and also understanding what it should not be used for. I asked what others were doing and for their advice. The interest in that post was electric. So far it has had just over 40,000 views and hundreds of reactions and comments. The lead person for CoPilot rollout in NHS England became involved in the conversation, as did people from Microsoft. There were differing views on how the rollouts had been handled, and given the fact that this was all done locally, that’s not surprising. The NHS England had done a significant amount of work with the initial proof of concept (30,000 users) and writing use cases and benefits models (as well as apparently a DCB0129 – where is that?). However, I think the fact that the implementation was largely left to local NHS organisations was a mistake, given the uncertainty and variability in responses we’ve seen. I think that communication briefings should have been handled locally, by arranging webinars, training sessions, FAQ lists etc. It would have been helpful for resource packs to have been developed centrally and informed by the pilot. If this id happen, many frontline staff haven’t seen these resources or made use of them. I updated the LinkedIn post to capture the resources that had been shared in the comments (and in some direct messages to me). If other people have useful resources they’d like to share, please do comment below with the links, or you can email our team at [email protected]. Thank you to all those that shared their experiences, helpful resources and their commitment to ensure every staff member is secure in how they use and benefit from CoPilot. Sherwood Forest Hospitals have a 'Responsible use of M365 Copilot for NHS.net Connect' Guide: https://www.sfh-tr.nhs.uk/media/sajavs1n/co-pilot-responsible-use-of-co-pilot.pdf Resources from Microsoft: https://adoption.microsoft.com/en-gb/copilot/ Staff training resources: https://livesend.microsoft.com/ls/1a365ac1-986b-4ff7-9be0-b9e3a7309501/MQEQhnztYeaVOYy6#/ Microsoft end user self-paced learning: https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/microsoft-365-copilot An example of role-based training provided by Microsoft (this one is for Clinical Administrators): https://msit.events.teams.microsoft.com/event/3c0b9862-fcc4-4994-b6ce-4d8024900191@72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 M365 Copilot and M365 Copilot Chat (Web) Acceptable Use Policy: https://comms-mat.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/Comms-Archive/M365+Copilot+Acceptable+Use+Policy+v1.1.pdf Data Protection Impact Assessment - NHS.net Connect (formerly NHSmail) M365 Copilot : https://comms-mat.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/Comms-Archive/NHS.net+Connect+Microsoft+365+Copilot+DPIA+v2.0+(GA).pdf We hope that you find this blog of interest, and it might help the NHS reflect on the balance of directing and supporting Trusts in future AI and technology rollouts. And with so much more promised in the 10 Year Plan, let’s all consider how we can support front line staff to optimise the opportunities for productivity improvement.
  7. Content Article
    Improving productivity is integral to creating a high-performing and sustainable health service. Amid tight public finances and stalled progress in improving the nation’s health, the NHS in England needs to seize opportunities over the next decade to deliver more and better care to patients for every pound spent.  To assist, the Health Foundation has launched the NHS Productivity Commission to develop practical, evidence-based and ambitious solutions to improve productivity. This report lays the groundwork, setting out: our understanding of NHS system productivity trends in key measures over the past two decades and diagnosing the reasons for the NHS’s recent stalling productivity our four-driver framework, which will guide future recommendations how you can get involved via our call for evidence.
  8. Content Article
    The UK faces a series of complex cross-cutting health challenges. Addressing these interrelated issues – from access to services to health and work – requires a fresh approach. Often, no single part of government can tackle these sorts of issues alone and too often the public sector is set up to treat the symptoms of a problem rather than an underlying cause. We must go further and think of the problem more dynamically through a whole-of-government approach (WGA). A perfect example of this is the recent sharp rise in the number of people out of the workforce due to long-term sickness. This has significant impacts on individuals’ wellbeing, as well as large fiscal and economic costs. It requires concerted cross-government action to reverse these impacts. This is why the NHS Confederation and Boston Consulting Group partnered on a project to identify a set of practical actions the government can take to make progress.  This report explores these actions. It will be of interest to government and policymakers, as well as the NHS, local delivery partners, funding organisations and stakeholders involved in work addressing the wider social determinants of health.
  9. Content Article
    In this blog, journalist Rory Cellan-Jones reflects on some major challenges the NHS currently faces. Sharing insights from a recent meeting with medtech companies and a lecture by economist Professor Diane Coyle, he shares concerns that productivity in the health service has decreased as a result of the pandemic, and that medtech companies face barriers in selling their solutions to the NHS. He highlights a growing consensus that policymakers need to think beyond immediate firefighting and look at how to transform the NHS over the long term.
  10. Content Article
    A dilemma is a situation in which a difficult choice has to be made between two or more alternatives, especially ones that are equally undesirable. Healthcare is full of dilemmas as a result of the huge number of stakeholders with conflicting goals, multifaceted interactions and constraints, and multiple perspectives, which change daily. Dilemmas are created when safety conflicts with productivity, cost efficiency, and flow. A focus on one patent’s safety may conflict with a focus on all patients’ safety. It is vital that the different stakeholders talk to expose dilemmas and reveal the hidden trade-offs or adjustments that are kept secret because people are fearful of the consequences. Articulating dilemmas helps us to find a way to bring people with different interests and incentives into a conversation that meets everyone’s needs.
  11. Content Article
    'The Productive Ward: Releasing time to care' was a quality improvement programme developed by the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement (NHSI) and introduced in 2007. It was designed to improve efficiency, productivity and performance at ward level in acute hospitals. It was based on three principles: good ward organisation so that materials were readily accessible displaying ward-level metrics such as patient safety and experience use of visual aids to understand patient status at a glance. This NIHR (National Institute for Health Research) funded study, published in the Health Services and Delivery Research journal, used quantitative and qualitative methods to evaluate the programme in six acute hospitals in England. It found some evidence of a lasting impact, such as wards continuing to display metrics and using equipment storage systems. But most hospitals that adopted the programme had stopped using it after three years, often due to a change in their approach to quality improvement. Productive Ward resources are still available from NHS England’s Sustainable Improvement team, but are under review. This evaluation may be helpful in designing future similar schemes.
  12. Content Article
    Sleep is fundamental to good health. Healthcare professionals receive little teaching on the importance of sleep, particularly with respect to their own health when working night shifts. Knowledge of basic sleep physiology, together with simple strategies to improve core sleep and the ability to cope with working nights, can result in significant improvements both for healthcare professionals and for the patients they care for. This article by Dr Mike Farquhar, published in the Archives of Disease in Childhood: Education & Practice, gives practical advice for night shift workers and, generally, how to improve your quality of sleep.
  13. Content Article
    This project is led by the Department of Anaesthesia at Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, in partnership with Northumbria University Newcastle. The aim is to co-design a fatigue risk management strategy at the Trust to help teams effectively manage night shift fatigue.  This project will involve an action research, whole team approach to effective management of fatigue in theatre and labour ward teams during the night shift. The interventions will involve educating night shift workers about the impact of fatigue on work performance, and holding focus groups to explore experiences of fatigue, and suggested ways of mitigating night shift tiredness. Ideas will then be tested out, before the strategy is finalised and implemented. During the testing, staff will use wearable activity monitors and an app, which will help demonstrate the impact of new processes. This participatory approach and the interventions should improve team working at night, with breaks and powernaps built into the work schedule. This may improve decision-making, the management of emergencies, patient and staff safety, and staff morale. This project is currently underway and will be completed in March 2020.
  14. Content Article
    Presentation slides from Salford University's Patient Safety Conference. Topics include human factors, learning from deaths, neonatal and maternal patient safety, patient safety in primary care, medicines safety, safety in social care and patient engagement. 2. Master Slides (3).pdf AC_Salfordsafety_primary_care (1).pdf CW - Salford Apr 2019.pdf JH - Meds Safety Salford.pdf MT - Maternal and Neonatal Health Safety Collaborative Break out session.pdf Ursula Clarke PSP Patient Safety April 2019 final.pdf VC - Salford University Patient Safety Conference Glos_ Hosp_ Workshop_ 23 _April _2019.pdf
  15. Content Article
    The Faculty of Medical Leadership and Management (FMLM) have developed a self-assessment tool for multi-professional healthcare teams, irrespective of their background or sector. Individuals, teams and organisations need clarity and support on how to establish and sustain high performing multi-professional healthcare teams. This self-assessment tool offers a simple and accessible measure of team performance to facilitate this process.
  16. Content Article
    In March 2025, the UK Government announced that it was disbanding NHS England, the arm's length government body that oversees healthcare delivery in England. Although there is public support for change in the NHS, a polling report by UCL Policy Labs and More in Common concluded that the “British people are looking for change, but not chaos, radicalism, not recklessness.” This article looks at where the dissolution of NHS England falls in the current UK context.
  17. Content Article
    This is the National Audit Office's (NAO's) ninth report on the financial management of the NHS in England. It's previous report published in February 2020 outlined that NHS England (NHSE) needed to carry out financial restructuring to put all NHS bodies were on a realistic path to breaking even.  This report comes after a major change to the ways in which NHS services are funded—the Health and Care Act 2022 introduced Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) on a statutory footing. The 42 ICSs bring together NHS bodies, local government and other organisations.   The report outlines: the NHS’s current financial position and operating context. whether NHSE’s financial management processes allow accurate and timely decision-making and support for NHS bodies that are struggling. the relationship between financial management and NHS performance, productivity and efficiency. the challenges to the NHS’s financial sustainability in the longer term. The report outlines the following conclusions about financial management and sustainability in the NHS in England: The scale of challenge facing the NHS today and foreseeable in the years ahead is unprecedented. While ICSs have resulted in some transformation, the pace of change has been slow as ICSs struggle to manage the day-to-day pressures of elective recovery following the pandemic, continual rising demand for NHS services and significant workforce and productivity issues. As they are statutorily required to do, NHS England and NHS systems have prioritised trying to live within their allocated funding. But, despite great in-year efforts to do so, an increasing number of NHS bodies have been unable to break even. The health needs of the population look set to increase and the NHS may be working at the limits of a system which might break before it is again able to provide patients with care that meets standards for timeliness and accessibility. There is a question for policymakers to answer about the growing mismatch between demand for NHS services and the funding the NHS receives. Either much future demand for healthcare must be avoided, or the NHS will need a great deal more funding, or service levels will continue to be unacceptable and may even deteriorate further.
  18. Content Article
    This paper was presented to the NHS England board at its public session on 16 May 2024. It discusses the effect the pandemic has had on NHS productivity with details of NHS England’s estimates for the drivers of the loss of productivity observed. It also discusses the emerging plan to improve productivity in the coming years. The paper highlights the following areas as key to improving productivity: Operational and clinical excellence Building leadership and organisational capacity and capability to deliver improvement through NHS IMPACT as NHS England's single improvement approach for supporting systems and providers with continuous improvement. Continuing to expand Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) methodologies, which now cover more than 40 surgical and medical workstreams. Driving adoption of less clinically demanding treatments, such as the world-first rollout of subcutaneous immunotherapy for lung cancer that cuts treatment time by 75%. Continuing to tackle interventions of limited or no clinical value through the evidence-base interventions programme, a clinically-led programme led by the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges in partnership with NHS England. A healthy motivated and engaged workforce Implementing the NHS Long Term Workforce Plan – listening to staff to improve, flexible working practices, optimising skills to better meet needs, developing a management culture and focus on improvement. Improving how we deploy our staff to meet the needs of patients and maximising the use of valuable staff time, reducing the need to rely on expensive agency staff when it can be avoided. Improving staff engagement and retention. It outlines that work is underway on a detailed plan and update to cover all aspects of productivity improvement, including the following priorities: Focussing on health rather than illness by investing in preventative care, keeping people independent for longer and caring for people as close to home as possible. Embracing 21st century technology by investing in IT systems that work well for both staff and patients. Maximising value for money by taking action such as cutting duplication.
  19. Content Article
    In this blog, Siva Anandaciva, Chief Policy Analyst at The King's Fund, examines NHS productivity—a top political priority. He highlights the difficulties in understanding the reasons for low productivity in the NHS after the Covid-19 pandemic and outlines the need to distinguish between productivity and delivery in order to really understand the issues.
  20. Content Article
    In its 75th anniversary year, the strains on the NHS are all too clear, with demand from an ageing population increasing, while the number of patients treated is still lower than before the pandemic. The Chancellor recently announced the “most ambitious productivity review ever undertaken by government”, yet it is unclear how to bring about the necessary productivity improvements in the NHS to meet the challenges of the future.  For the 2023 REAL challenge lecture, Professor Dame Diane Coyle, Bennett Professor of Public Policy at the University of Cambridge, explored some of the key drivers of UK healthcare productivity and discuss what we might hope the NHS will look like when it reaches its centenary. You can watch the video of the lecture and download the slides below.
  21. News Article
    The NHS’s finances are so dire that the whole health service may break unless it receives a massive cash injection, Whitehall’s spending watchdog has warned. Years of underfunding have left the NHS in England so cash-strapped that it cannot treat patients quickly enough, and the rising tide of ill-health will make matters worse, the National Audit Office (NAO) said. The NAO does not specify how much extra funding the health service needs to get it back on its feet and ensure trusts that provide care can balance their books. But a leading thinktank recently put that figure at £38bn more a year by the end of this parliament. Its grim conclusions raise serious questions about whether Keir Starmer’s government can fulfil its ambitious pledges to rescue the NHS, and again meet key waiting time targets on surgery and A&E care, without spending significantly more money. The NAO said: “When we consider how the health needs of the population look set to increase, we are concerned that the NHS may be working at the limits of a system which might break before it is again able to provide patients with care that meets standards for timeliness and accessibility. There is a wider question for policymakers to answer about the potential growing mismatch between demand for NHS services and the funding the NHS will receive. Either much future demand for healthcare must be avoided, or the NHS will need a great deal more funding, or service levels will continue to be unacceptable and may even deteriorate further.” A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said, “Not only has this government inherited the worst economic circumstances since the second world war, but also an NHS in deficit. Getting the NHS back on its feet is our priority, but it will take time." Read the National Audit Office report NHS financial management and sustainability 2024 on the hub Read full story Source: Guardian, 23 July 2024
  22. News Article
    Medical devices should be judged more on the value they bring to a wider health economy than just the price of the items, according to draft Department of Health and Social Care procurement guidance seen by HSJ. The draft methodology, produced by Department of Health and Social Care’s MedTech directorate, outlines how “value” should be given a minimum weighting of 60 per cent while price should have a maximum weighting of 40 per cent when procurement teams are evaluating which products to buy. The “value” weighting will include a minimum of 10 per cent which must be applied to social value, which is already a requirement for all public procurements. This would reverse established practice across many procurements that sets the price of products or services as the most important factor, at times to the detriment of products that provide greater value to a health economy. It is intended to be used for all procurements of medical devices. It came from the 2023 MedTech strategy, which “identified that the value of medtech products should not be considered in isolation but across the whole patient pathway and that lowest price does not always translate to best value,” it said. The plan is for it to become one of a set of commercial ”playbooks” produced by NHS England as part of the implementation of its national commercial strategic framework, which it published in November 2023. The draft methodology should bring consistency to how the NHS judges value in a procurement and to the evidence suppliers produce to support their offering. This should mean effective products are adopted more widely and their system-wide benefits to patient pathways are realised at scale. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 30 April 2024
  23. Community Post
    This year's theme for World Patient Safety Day (17 September) is Health Worker Safety: A Priority for Patient Safety. We know that staff safety is intrinsically linked to patient safety but we need your insight to help us understand what matters most when it comes to feeling safe at work. So we're asking you to tell us: What is most needed for health and care staff to feel physically or mentally safe at work? In this short video, Claire Cox (Patient Safety Learning's Associate Director of Patient Safety and a Nurse) shares her top three. What do you think is most needed? Please join the conversation and help us speak up for health worker safety! Nb: You'll need to sign in to the hub to comment (click on the icon in the top right of your screen). If you're not a member yet, you can sign up here for free.
  24. Content Article
    The workforce crisis engulfing the health and care system is well documented. In the NHS, increases in staff numbers are not keeping pace with demand for staff and services; in 2021/22, for the first time, the number of people working in adult social care in England fell, and there are now 165,000 vacancies.  In this long read, Sally Warren, Director of Policy at The King's Fund, looks at a report by Bill Morgan, commissioned by The King's Fund and Engage Britain, to consider why politicians have failed to act, where only they can, to deliver the workforce that the health and care system needs. The article covers the following areas: Transparency in workforce planning assumptions   Training and international recruitment Retention: it’s not just about pay More than a numbers game, getting the culture and leadership right Productivity and skill mix Action at all levels Service improvement ambitions matched to the available workforce
  25. Content Article
    This study in the Journal of Health Organization and Management aimed to explore factors shaping the implementation of five new care model (NCM) initiatives in the North East of England. The study findings demonstrate that all five pilot sites experienced, and were subject to, unrealistic pressure placed upon them to deliver outcomes.
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.