Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Health inequalities'.

More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous


  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
  • Patient engagement
  • Patient safety in health and care
  • Patient Safety Learning
  • Professionalising patient safety
  • Research, data and insight
  • Miscellaneous


  • News

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start

Last updated

  • Start

Filter by number of...


  • Start



First name

Last name


About me



Found 136 results
  1. News Article
    A majority of pregnant women who died from coronavirus during the peak of the pandemic were from an ethnic minority background, it has emerged. A new study of more than a dozen women who died between March and May this year also heavily criticised the reorganisation of NHS services which it said contributed to poor care and the deaths of some of the women. This included one woman who was twice denied an intensive care bed because there were none available, as well as women treated by inexperienced staff who had been redeployed by hospitals and who made mistakes in their treatment of the women. The report, by experts at the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, based at the University of Oxford, also criticised mental health services after four women died by suicide. The report said women were “bounced” between services which had stopped face-to-face assessments during the crisis. The report looked at 16 women’s deaths in total. Eight women died from COVID-19, seven of whom had an ethnic minority background. Two women with Covid-19 died from unrelated causes, four died by suicide and two were victims of homicide. In the report, published on Thursday, the authors concluded improvements in care could have been made in 13 of the deaths they examined. In six cases, improvements in care could have meant they survived. Read full story Source: The Independent, 21 August 2020
  2. News Article
    Millions of women and girls around the world have been left unable to access contraception and abortions amid the coronavirus crisis, a new report has found. A study by Marie Stopes International, which provides abortion and contraception services worldwide, warns 1.9 million women and girls lost their usual access to its contraception and safe abortion services in the first half of the year as a result of the global public health emergency. The abortion provider is preparing for 900,000 additional unintended pregnancies, 1.5 million extra unsafe abortions, and 3,100 additional pregnancy-related deaths after the disruption to services in the first half of the year. Dr Rashmi Ardey, of Marie Stopes, said: “Women’s needs do not suddenly stop or diminish during an emergency – they become greater. And as a doctor, I have seen only too often the drastic action that women and girls take when they are unable to access contraception and safe abortion. “This pandemic has strained healthcare services all over the world, but sexual and reproductive healthcare was already so under prioritised that once again women are bearing the brunt of this global calamity.” Read full story Source: The Independent,19 August 2020
  3. Event
    The Health Foundation is exploring the pandemic’s implications for health and health inequalities. In this webinar, we share our learning so far, focusing on groups of people who have been particularly affected including young people and Black and minority ethnic groups. We’ll explore what the economic impact of the pandemic means for the wider determinants of health. And, as we move towards post-COVID-19 recovery, we’ll look at what's needed to address health inequalities and to create the conditions for everyone to live a healthy life. Register
  4. News Article
    Policymakers’ failure to tackle chronically underfunded social care has resulted in a “lost decade” and a system now at breaking point, according to a new report. A team led by Jon Glasby, a professor of health and social care at the University of Birmingham, says that without swift government intervention including urgent funding changes England’s adult social care system could quickly become unsustainable. Adult social care includes residential care homes and help with eating, washing, dressing and shopping. The paper says the impact has been particularly felt in services for older people. Those for working-age people have been less affected. It suggests that despite the legitimate needs of other groups “it is hard to interpret this other than as the product of ageist attitudes and assumptions about the role and needs of older people”. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 9 August 2020
  5. Content Article
    Recommendations include: Employers should carry out risk assessments for staff with vulnerable characteristics, including those from black and minority ethnic backgrounds, as well as those from disadvantaged communities. Employers should ensure that all key workers in public-facing roles have access to adequate PPE. The government should establish a tailored Find, Test, Trace, Isolate and Support (FTTIS) programme which ensures that marginalised and BME communities who are more vulnerable to the coronavirus are identified and supported.Temporary housing, including hotels, bed and breakfasts, and community shelters, should be made available to individuals to facilitate self-isolation of symptomatic individuals.The social security safety net should be significantly strengthened. The government should increase Statutory Sickness Pay (SSP) and broaden eligibility for SSP.The government must address the root causes of health, housing and employment inequality. 
  6. Content Article
    This article, published by the European Heart Journal, questions whether we have a sufficient fund of knowledge to close the persistent gender gap in IHD and vanquish the Yentl syndrome to history. While increasing knowledge exists regarding pathophysiological mechanistic pathways for ‘female-pattern IHD’, translational studies aimed at developing practical diagnosis and therapeutics with both traditional and novel treatments are needed. Further closure of knowledge gaps related to the paradox and the pathophysiology of IHD in women is one of our highest priorities to improve the health of the 51% of the population that is female and represent currently the majority of deaths.
  7. Content Article
    Contents: Definition of discrimination Why people with a learning disability are at increased risk of discrimination Additional discrimination seen when people have Dementia Definition of Stigma Why stigma is historically a BIG problem in Dementia The importance of challenging stigma to support living well What has been done to tackle stigma? The national ambition for reducing discrimination and stigma How discrimination and stigma can make a person feel Recognising discrimination and stigma in everyday life How to support a person when they are the subject of discrimination or stigma Reporting concerns How you can avoid being discriminatory or stigmatising Combating discrimination and stigma Taking inspiration from the disability movement Education! Education! Education.
  8. Content Article
    “The first duty of any health system is to do no harm to those in its care; but I am sorry to say that in too many cases concerning Primodos, sodium valproate and pelvic mesh, our system has failed in its responsibilities. We met with people, more often than not women, whose worlds have been turned upside down… by the pain, anguish and guilt they feel.” Those were the words of Baroness Julia Cumberlege, Chair of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review, as the long-awaited Cumberlege Review was published last month. The report, First Do No Harm, addresses three particularly horrifying women’s health scandals, and describes “a culture of dismissive and arrogant attitudes” where patients’ suffering was frequently dismissed as “women’s issues” or “all in your head”. But the scandals surrounding Primodos, sodium valproate and pelvic mesh are not simply isolated cases of bad practice, and nor do they exist in a vacuum; they’re a symptom of the deeply ingrained conscious and unconscious biases that are built into our medical system. As a freelance journalist specialising in women’s health, I noticed several years ago that there were patterns emerging in much of what I was writing about. Whether I was writing specifically about gynaecological health, or about any other aspect of women’s physical and mental health, certain words and phrases came up a lot, largely in relation to their interactions with healthcare. “My doctor didn’t believe me.” “Dismissed as all in my head.” “Misdiagnosed.” “Drama queen.” “Hypochondriac.” “Over-reacting.” “Just a normal part of being a woman.” And, heartbreakingly: “I thought I was going mad.” Once you start talking to women about this, you realise quite how common these dismissive attitudes are. Women told me about waiting years and years for proper diagnoses and treatments. Many more told me that medical gaslighting had left them feeling isolated and questioning their own sanity, wondering if maybe their pain really was in their head after all. Beyond the overwhelming quantity of anecdotal evidence, there’s also no shortage of research highlighting what’s been dubbed ‘the gender pain gap.’ We know, for example, that women are kept waiting longer in A&E and are less likely than men to be given effective painkillers – but more likely to be given sedatives or anti-anxiety medication. Women also receive worse quality care than men when having a heart attack, and are more likely to die from one as a result. We also know that other biases, including racism, ageism and homophobia, play a part in the way women are treated – like the shocking fact that black women are five times more likely than white women to die during pregnancy and childbirth. In October 2018, I launched Hysterical Women, a feminist health blog dedicated to exploring the biases and dismissive attitudes in women’s healthcare. It’s a platform to curate women’s stories and experiences, as well as engage with other writers, patient advocacy groups and campaigns, clinicians and policy makers about the issues at play. Hysterical Women isn’t anti-clinicians or anti-NHS – for whom I have nothing but the utmost respect and gratitude – although many of the stories I feature are critical of individual attitudes and behaviours. For me, it’s much more about highlighting the deeply ingrained, systemic, cultural problems that run through the entire medical system – from lack of research and funding for women’s health issues, through to medical education, time and resource pressures, and the wide-ranging effects of working in a system that, by and large, views the white male body as the default. Hysterical Women takes its name from ‘hysteria’, a catch-all diagnosis used from 1900 BC until 1980 AD, which has its origins in the idea that pretty much any symptom a woman experienced was caused by the wanderings of her pesky womb. From Hippocrates to Freud, the history of hysteria provides a fascinating insight into the ways women’s mental and physical health have been misunderstood over thousands of years. It’s a history that continues to loom large over the medical profession; a persistent unconscious bias whose whispers can still be heard in phrases highlighted by the Cumberlege Review, like “women’s issues” and “all in your head”. But Hysterical Women is about much more than wombs – in recognition both of the fact that not every woman has one, and that women’s health consists of far more than just periods, reproduction and the menopause. Stories on the blog encompass all areas of health – from acute physical issues like heart attacks, appendicitis, pneumonia and knee injuries, to chronic problems like fibromyalgia, myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (PoTS) and long-term mental illness. It also, of course, covers no end of gynaecological and hormonal issues, but in many ways I’m most fascinated by the gender bias I see in areas of healthcare that have absolutely nothing to do with uteruses, ovaries or vaginas. It all just goes to show how much bigger and broader a problem this is. Of course, doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals are human, and medicine itself is neither static nor infallible; mistakes and misdiagnoses are made, things get missed, and our knowledge and understanding is constantly evolving. But in a system founded on the principle of “do no harm”, the harm caused by any single one of these individual experiences should be both a tragedy and a learning experience. Collectively, cumulatively, they add up to a devastating cost – both in terms of the quality of life impact for countless women, but also the long-term healthcare cost of being dismissed instead of treated at the earliest opportunity. One woman I interviewed several years ago suffered permanent bladder and bowel damage thanks to the ten-year delay in diagnosing and treating her endometriosis. Other women describe the mistrust and alienation they now feel, which makes them reluctant to seek medical advice or attend routine screening appointments in future, or even prompts them to seek out (potentially dangerous, often untested and unregulated) alternative treatments. At any given time, you only have to skim through the most recent few posts on the blog to understand what a false economy this is. As with all systemic problems, there is no simple, overnight fix to gender bias in medicine. But it begins with listening to women[1] (as NICE specifically advised in its guidance on endometriosis in 2017), acknowledging them as the experts in their own bodies, and taking a more collaborative approach to patient care. Many brilliant clinicians are already working hard to address gender and other inequalities, both in their own practice and within their professional bodies, but there’s still a lot of work to be done. Hysterical Women welcome’s stories from all women (both cis and trans), as well as any trans or non-binary AFAB individuals who have been dismissed, disbelieved or not taken seriously in healthcare settings. For more information on how to contribute, please visit the Hysterical Women blog site. Reference [1] Bosely, S, 2018. The Guardian. 'Listen to women': UK doctors issued with first guidance on endometriosis https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/sep/06/listen-to-women-uk-doctors-issued-with-first-guidance-on-endometriosis
  9. News Article
    A healthy population is one of any nation’s most important assets. We have known for a long time that not everyone has the same opportunity to access the things they need to lead a healthy life, such as good quality work and safe secure stable housing. Now we can see that the COVID-19 pandemic is replicating and exacerbating deep-rooted health inequalities. Without concerted action, this health crisis will also become a health inequalities crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought health inequalities into sharp focus. While every part of the population has been affected by the current crisis, some communities have been hit much harder both by the virus itself and by the measures taken to control its spread. Evidence is starting to emerge, for example, of the unequal impact of the shutdown of the economy. For example a recent survey of UK households found that the lowest earners have been worst hit by loss of earnings, with the most severe losses for single parents. The uneven impact of COVID-19 has also highlighted the inequalities faced by Black, Asian and minority ethnic communities. Recent data shows that some ethnic groups are at much higher risk of dying from COVID-19 than the rest of the population (e.g. Black men are four times more likely to have died of COVID-19 than their White peers). Read full article here.