All content
Showing all content.
To sort the content by type, date or tags you will need to be logged into the hub. Join the hub today to enjoy full member benefits.
- Today
-
Content Article
This study looked at the role of human factors on surgical outcomes, with a series of 243 arterial switch operations performed by 21 surgeons taken as a model. The following data were collected: patient-specific and procedural variables, self-assessment questionnaires, and a written report from a human factors researcher who observed the operation. The relationship of patient-specific variables to outcomes (death and death and/or near miss) was used to develop a multivariable baseline model to analyze the role of human factors after adjustment for these variables. The overall mortality was 6.6% with 24.3% of cases resulting in death and death and/or near misses. The self-assessment questionnaires were found to be unhelpful. Major and minor human failures were extracted from the written report. Major negative events were potentially life-threatening failures, whereas minor events were failures that, in isolation, were not expected to have serious consequences. Major events were closely related to death and death and/or near misses. Appropriate compensation, however, sharply reduced the risk of death. The total number of minor events was also closely related to both death and death and/or near misses. The study highlights the role of human factors in negative surgical outcomes. Even in the most eventful circumstances, however, appropriate human factors defense mechanisms can lead to a successful outcome. -
Content Article
During the last 25 years public policy in the UK has aimed to replace ‘club' cultures and their supposedly suspect reliance on trust between professionals and public with a new public culture based on accountability and ‘transparency'. These transformations have changed both clinical practice and public health policy in deep ways. Are the new conceptions of accountability adequate? Are obligations to be ‘transparent' any more than requirements to disclose information which overlook the need for genuine communication? Can demands for ever fuller informed consent improve accountability to individual patients and research subjects? Could we devise more intelligent conceptions of accountability that support more intelligent placing and refusal of trust? What might intelligent conceptions of accountability suggest about proper clinical practice, public health medicine and professional responsibilities?- Posted
-
- Consent
- Transparency
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
German doctor jailed for murder of 15 patients and suspected of more
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
A German palliative care doctor has been sentenced to life imprisonment for killing 15 of his patients. A court in Berlin found the 41-year-old man, named only as Johannes M. in line with German privacy rules, guilty of murdering 12 women and 3 men between September 2021 and July 2024. The authorities believe these killings could be just the tip of the iceberg. Prosecutors are currently investigating dozens of other incidents involving the doctor. His victims were between the ages of 25 and 94. The court heard how they were all critically ill, but that their deaths were not imminent. Prosecutors said that during home visits, the doctor administered a lethal combination of various medicines without his patients' consent. On several occasions, they said he set fires to cover his tracks. In July 2024, shortly before his arrest, prosecutors said the doctor killed two patients in a single day - a 75-year-old man at his home in central Berlin and, a few hours later, a 76-year-old woman in a neighbouring district. They said the doctor tried to set fire to the woman's house, but failed. For much of the trial, which has gone on for about a year, the doctor said nothing. But last month, he confessed to having "killed people," twelve of his severely ill patients. He told the court he had convinced himself that he was doing the right thing, sparing them "suffering and infirmity". Read full story Source: BBC News, 8 July 2026 -
News Article
CEO warns against ‘top slicing’ acutes for ‘well meaning’ neighbourhood schemes
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Large acute trusts are shouldering unreasonable risk because their funding has been “top sliced” to pay for “well meaning” but unproven “neighbourhood health” schemes, a leading London CEO has told HSJ. Shane DeGaris, of Barts Health Trust, said the financial transition to realise the hospital-to-community “shift” was currently “not clear”, and much of the risk was with with hospital providers. Mr DeGaris said his £2.7bn organisation was “supportive” of neighbourhood health, and in “live discussions” on how responsibility for it can be divided up in North East London. But in an interview with HSJ, he warned his and other acutes were facing potential deficits, with the funding regime becoming “increasingly bad” for them. Mr DeGaris said his trust “fully supports” the shift of services from hospital to community, but added: “There’s going to be a huge chunk of work still going to be required to do in hospitals… “[We need to make sure] all the stranded costs aren’t there for the hospitals in a world where accountability now is all about individual trusts. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 9 July 2026 -
News Article
A&E visits hit record high in June as heatwave struck UK
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
An average of 80,000 people visited A&E every day last month for the first time ever in June, as record temperatures hit the UK. The NHS has said it is under just as much pressure as in winter and staff are facing an “onslaught of demand” amid heatwaves and the World Cup. Average daily A&E attendances reached 81,264 for the first time ever in June - setting a new daily attendance record. NHS national medical director Professor Frankie Swords said: “These figures show that summer is now putting the NHS under just as much pressure as winter, with staff facing an onslaught of demand – and we have to prepare for it in the same way. “What we’re seeing on the ground is really busy Mondays following weekends of football and sunshine, so please don’t delay coming forward for care when you need it, even if it’s in early hours on a weekend. “In the continuing warm weather, please take precautions like staying hydrated, and check in on loved ones or those who are vulnerable, and as always, please dial 999 in an emergency, and otherwise use 111.” Read full story Source: The Independent, 9 July 2026 -
Content Article Comment
Celebrating 5 years of the Patient Safety Management Network
Liz Bennett commented on Patient Safety Learning's article in Patient Safety Learning
- Collaboration
- Information sharing
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
Five years of the PSMN does not seem possible! Many thanks to Claire and Helen for their dedication and inspiration. I agree with the assertion in this blog that it is not a straightforward path from learning new information and skills at the PSMN meetings to implementing them in our respective organisations. Nevertheless. the learning has been invaluable and has shown members have very similar experiences. Looking forward to the next five years!- Posted
- 1 comment
-
- Collaboration
- Information sharing
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
This article argues that while colour-coded scrubs can help identify healthcare staff, relying on scrub colour alone is an unreliable way to distinguish roles during emergencies. Drawing on a patient safety incident, the author describes how clinical students wearing the same colour scrubs as licensed professionals created confusion during a cardiac arrest response, making it difficult to identify who was qualified and who still needed to attend. The article highlights that colour cues are vulnerable to errors caused by stress, poor lighting, visual overload and differences in colour perception. Instead, it recommends stronger, layered approaches to role identification, including clearly labelled staff badges, predefined emergency response roles, designated team leaders and structured communication techniques such as callouts and check-backs. Related reading on the hub: Patient safety starts with knowing who is in the room- Posted
-
- Staff factors
- Emergency medicine
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
- Yesterday
-
Event
AI in care: Its use and regulation – in conversation with CQC
Sam posted an event in Community Calendar
An update from CQC about their new guidance on the use of AI in social care settings with opportunities to ask questions. This webinar is an opportunity to hear updates from CQC on their approach to regulation and AI following the publication of their recent guidance: Artificial intelligence in health and social care: CQC’s role, expectations and plans – Care Quality Commission Hosted by the AI in Care Alliance – a collaborative focussed on the responsible use of AI in Adult Social Care. Register- Posted
-
- AI
- Regulatory issue
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Event
Co-production in digital care: Putting people in control
Sam posted an event in Community Calendar
This webinar will explore how organisations across adult social care are using co-production to shape digital services, data use and innovation alongside the people most affected by them. The discussion will focus on a critical question: Who gets to influence how digital data is collected, used and acted on in adult social care? Too often, digital transformation happens to people rather than with them. This session will examine what happens when people with lived experience are genuinely involved in decision-making, service design and digital innovation from the beginning, not simply asked for feedback once decisions have already been made. The webinar will highlight examples where co-production has worked well because: people had real influence and shared ownership services listened and adapted digital approaches reflected people’s actual lives and needs organisations built trust through transparency and collaboration The session will also explore where organisations have struggled, including: consultation being mistaken for co-production digital systems being designed without end-user input communities feeling unheard or excluded power remaining with organisations rather than people The conversation will centre the voices of: people drawing on care and support unpaid carers and families frontline staff communities affected by digital change every day. Register- Posted
-
- Social care
- Digital health
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article Comment
Petition for a Robbie's Law: https://www.change.org/p/implement-legislation-for-individual-legal-duty-of-candour-for-all-public-officials- Posted
- 1 comment
-
- Diagnostic error
- Criminal behaviour
- (and 12 more)
-
News Article
Mackey threatens sacking or prison for snooping staff
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Staff could face the sack or even time in prison if they access patient records without a legitimate reason, Sir Jim Mackey has warned. In a letter to hospital and regional leaders today, the NHS England chief executive called on boards to put a “renewed focus” on educating staff and implementing a “tough approach” in response to staff who “breach patient trust in this way”. HSJ revealed in June that multiple hospital staff had viewed medical records of Southport attack survivors without clinical reason in 2024 – resulting in allegations of a “cover up” and with no clear firm disciplinary action having been taken. Also in June, Nottingham University Hospitals announced it was sacking 11 staff for snooping on records after three people were killed in a stabbing in 2023. HSJ has revealed thousands of other similar concerns have been reported nationally, and that Cambridge University Hospitals has recently sacked staff. Sir Jim’s letter said: “There can be no place in the NHS for those who misuse patient information. Patient trust in our handling of their most sensitive data cannot be taken for granted and it is therefore critical that we both educate staff and take a hard line when their access to records falls below the standards we expect. “Anyone considering accessing records for personal reasons or out of curiosity should be in no doubt they could be putting their career at risk, and may face disciplinary action, dismissal, referral to the regulator or even time in prison.” NHSE has also published staff guidance and launched a campaign to remind them “of the law and the potential impact” of snooping. The headline messaging warns: “Don’t let curiosity kill your career.” Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 8 July 2026- Posted
-
- Accountability
- Staff factors
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
Accessing patient records out of curiosity or for personal reasons is illegal. It causes real harm to patients and could end your career. Everyone working in health and care has a professional and legal responsibility to protect people’s confidential information. This includes accessing patient records only where there is a clear and legitimate reason and doing so in a way that respects patients’ dignity and trust. Accessing records for any reason other than work purposes is both unethical and illegal. If you intentionally access people’s health and care records without an appropriate and approved work reason, you may be committing a criminal offence under the Data Protection Act 2018 and Computer Misuse Act 1990. It is also a serious breach of your employment contract and could result in disciplinary action, including dismissal. It could also result in a referral to your professional regulator and could end your career. NHS England has published Stopping unlawful access to records guidance for patients and service users.- Posted
-
- Accountability
- Standards
- (and 3 more)
-
News Article
‘Clear consequences’ for leaders who fail to tackle racism
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Board members will be held accountable for tackling workplace racism via personal objectives that must be made public under new national standards. The government’s NHS staff standards guidance, published this week, says organisations must “ensure every board member (including non-executive directors) has a published… objective on tackling racism”. They must appoint either their chief executive or chief operating officer as the senior responsible officer for tackling racism, and they will be “held to account against relevant workforce data [with] strong and clear consequences for poor performance”. “Tackling racism” is one of six staff standards set by the Department of Health and Social Care, as proposed in last year’s 10-Year Health Plan. The guidance said: “The 2025 NHS Staff Survey showed that instances of staff experiencing discrimination at work from patients, their families and the general public, managers or other colleagues, had increased again and are higher among ethnic minority staff compared to white staff. “Given these inequalities, this standard sets out the minimum national expectations for how all NHS organisations must prioritise, prevent, respond to and learn from incidents of racism in the workplace.” Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 8 July 2026- Posted
-
- Race
- Discrimination
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
The NHS staff standards set national minimum employment requirements to improve staff experience, outlining employer actions and what staff can expect. The 10 Year Health Plan committed to developing a new set of staff standards which will outline minimum standards for employment across a range of areas, aimed at improving staff experience. The standards set out the actions employers must take to deliver them and what staff can expect at work as a result. The documents published here bring together: an overview explaining why the staff standards have been introduced, how they will be used and what each standard means in practice the full staff standards, setting out the detailed requirements for employers. The staff standards focus on key areas that staff have told us matter most, including: line management health and wellbeing violence prevention and reduction sexual safety tackling racism flexible working. The standards have been developed by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and NHS England, working closely with employers and trade unions through the Social Partnership Forum, and are intended to be implemented locally through partnership working. The standards are for NHS staff, employers and leaders, and should be used alongside existing workforce policies and initiatives to support implementation. The standards will apply to secondary care, which includes acute, mental health, ambulance services and community healthcare.- Posted
-
- Staff factors
- Standards
- (and 4 more)
-
News Article
Complications after overseas surgeries cost NHS £1.8 million
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Almost half of patients who travelled abroad for cut-price cosmetic surgery returned home with serious complications such as splitting wounds, tissue death and sepsis, a new study has revealed. The medical tourism industry is estimated to be worth more than £20 billion, with surgery packages abroad often marketed at prices up to 80% lower than procedures in the UK. But if there are complications following the surgery patients can face difficulty accessing follow up support and plastic surgeons in the UK have warned “a cheaper operation can end up becoming a very expensive complication.” A study from the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (BAAPS) analysed almost 200 cases of patients treated in the UK after undergoing cosmetic procedures overseas. Nearly three in four patients required medical procedures or surgery after returning home, while almost half needed an operation under general anaesthetic to correct complications. The most common problems included severe infections, wounds splitting open, tissue death, nipple loss and fluid collections requiring repeated treatment. Tragically, one patient died from a pulmonary embolism. However, the NHS is footing the bill, which between September 2022 and 2024 is estimated to have cost about £1.8 million - approximately £5883 to £9328 per patient. Read full story Source: The Independent, 7 July 2026 -
News Article
Thousands of women could be spared painful cancer exam by new NHS AI blood test
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Thousands of women could be spared having a painful intrusive exam for suspected cancer thanks to a new AI-powered blood test being trialled by the NHS. Around 90,000 postmenopausal women a year in England are referred by their GP to be investigated for possible womb cancer because they are bleeding a lot. Around 10,000 women a year in England are diagnosed with the disease – which is also known as uterine or endometrial cancer – and 2,700 die from it. However, the PinPoint blood test could save one in five of those women – 18,000 a year – from needing to undergo a diagnostic procedure called a transvaginal ultrasound scan, which measures the thickness of the lining of their womb, and many find uncomfortable or painful. Avoiding having that test unnecessarily has become a realistic prospect because, although 20% of women referred turn out not to have the disease, under the current NHS system of diagnosing cancers of the reproductive system, all have a pelvic examination involving an ultrasound scan. If doctors still suspect cancer, women potentially then have a tissue sample taken during a biopsy and a further examination called a hysteroscopy, which can often be painful. Prof Sean Duffy, the firm’s chief medical officer – an ex-NHS England national clinical director for cancer – said the test’s 99% accuracy for womb cancer “is remarkable by any clinical standards”. “But equally, its value lies in safely ruling out very low-risk women. This has the potential to spare thousands of patients from painful invasive procedures they do not need.” Read full story Source: The Guardian, 8 July 2026- Posted
-
- Womens health
- Cancer
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
If the NHS focused on removing ‘failure activity’, it could transform its productivity One common theme in discussions about NHS productivity is a pervasive pessimism about the impossibility of big improvements. Some, such as NHS Alliance chief executive officer Sir Ciaran Devane, believe the NHS would be lucky to eke out marginal improvements in the rate of productivity growth, and even that might depend on significant additional investment. That pessimism is misplaced. There are huge opportunities to drive big leaps in productivity. To understand why this is the case, we need to consider the misleadingly named concept of Failure Demand, writes Steve Black in this HSJ article. -
News Article
Online hospital risks ‘leaving behind’ mental health, top CEO warns
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Mental health is at risk of being “left behind” by the first online NHS hospital, a top mental health chief executive has said. Ify Okocha, CEO of Oxleas Foundation Trust told his board last week that he had personally challenged NHS Online’s new chair over the exclusion of mental health from the service’s initial plans. He said: “I feel strongly about it. This is often what happens – mental health is left behind, and then we’re told ‘we don’t quite know how to help you’. I’m keen for us to be a part of that.” The NHS “online hospital” will offer remote specialist treatment to patients referred by their GP. It is scheduled to see its first patients in 2027. Last month, one of NHS Online’s non-executive directors pledged that safeguards would be put in place to prevent the organisation from “draining the resources” of the wider NHS workforce. The trust is currently recruiting for its chief digital and information officer. In January, NHS England announced nine areas which would be the focus of the new hospital, including women’s health issues, prostate problems, and ophthalmology conditions. Dr Okocha said he was “struck by” the emphasis being placed on services like ophthalmology “but no mention of mental health”. He said he had raised this issue with those overseeing the hospital launch and was told, in essence, that “the service needed to start somewhere”. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 7 July 2026- Posted
-
- Mental health
- Treatment
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
The National Audit of Dementia (NAD) has published a report on the Service Mapping Exercise carried out across Memory Assessment Services in England and Wales, plus Jersey, in 2025. The report highlighted continuing demand for services, increase in waiting times, and wide variation in service staffing, specific diagnoses, and post diagnostic provision. Analysis of figures provided by services found approximately 2 referrals for every 1000 people in the catchment population. The median waiting time from referral to diagnosis has increased by 5 days to 137 days since the 2023 spotlight audit, despite low staff vacancies reported. There was great variation in staffing numbers and roles, and in services provision, with 23% of services not providing Cognitive Stimulation Therapy post-diagnosis. There continues to be wide variation in diagnoses at a service level, compounded by many services being unable to return data on diagnoses. Services reported low clinical vacancy rates overall. Over half reported joint working with neurology and geriatric medicine to enhance the diagnostic process.- Posted
-
- Dementia
- Organisation / service factors
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
Earlier this year, Clare Collins from Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust gave a presentation at the Patient Safety Management Network (PSMN) meeting on how their Trust has aimed to improve patient safety though a project to remove caffeinated drinks. In this blog, Clare shares their journey and what they have learned about implementation, engagement, organisational readiness and sustainability. From a practical idea to a patient safety movement What started as a simple question: “Could changing the type of tea and coffee routinely served on our wards improve patient safety?”, has evolved into a growing quality improvement programme with local, regional and international interest. As a team, we wanted to explore whether a small and practical change to everyday care could contribute to safer, calmer and more restorative ward environments. At Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, we developed the Decaf by Default initiative to explore whether routinely offering decaffeinated tea and coffee to patients could help reduce toileting related falls, improve sleep and hydration, and support calmer, safer ward environments. The project has since expanded across multiple inpatient settings, generated strong staff engagement, and prompted wider conversations around organisational readiness for cultural change in patient safety. Why consider going decaf? For many years, staff across our wards routinely offered caffeinated hot drinks to patients as the default option. While this was often seen as a normal part of care and comfort, emerging conversations within our Care for the Older Person community raised questions about whether this practice unintentionally contributed to avoidable harm. Several factors prompted further exploration: NICE guidance recommends reducing caffeine intake in relation to urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women. Caffeine can increase urinary urgency and frequency, potentially increasing the risk of toileting-related falls. Caffeine may negatively impact sleep and contribute to agitation. Non-caffeinated drinks can support hydration, rest, recovery and overall wellbeing. A review of Datix reports also identified that approximately 25% of inpatient falls over a one-month period were related to toileting activities, particularly within older people’s services. This led us to consider whether a relatively small environmental and behavioural change could contribute to safer care. Building the foundations: organisational readiness and engagement One of the strongest themes highlighted through discussions at the PSMN meeting was that success depended less on the decaf itself, and more on organisational readiness, staff engagement and shared ownership. From the outset, we did not approach this as a top-down instruction. Instead, the project focused on creating curiosity, shared ownership and practical collaboration. With senior nursing support, we established a quality improvement multidisciplinary community to explore the issue collectively. Staff from a range of professions and settings contributed ideas, concerns and learning throughout the process. Importantly, we also connected with University Hospitals Leicester, who had previously undertaken similar work. This external collaboration provided valuable insight, reassurance and practical learning. Several factors helped support implementation: Clinical ownership Ward teams were encouraged to shape how the initiative worked within their own environments rather than applying a rigid model. This helped improve engagement and sustainability. Preserving patient choice The initiative was never about removing patient choice. Patients could still request caffeinated drinks if preferred. A Taste the Difference challenge helped staff and patients explore perceptions around decaffeinated drinks. While around 55% of participants noticed a taste difference, approximately 85% said they would be willing to switch once they understood the potential benefits. Consistent messaging Simple, practical education materials were developed for staff, patients and carers, including posters, conversations at ward level and patient information leaflets. For example, digital teams looked at incorporating brief health promotion messaging into discharge documentation: “While in hospital, you were given decaffeinated tea and coffee. It may help to continue this at home.” This will reinforce the intervention beyond admission and encourage patients and carers to consider whether continuing reduced caffeine intake at home might support sleep, continence, anxiety management or falls prevention. Communities of interest One of the most important learning points was the value of building communities of staff who were genuinely interested in improving patient safety. Enthusiasm and local leadership often became stronger drivers than formal instruction. As discussed during the PSMN presentation, staff ownership proved critical to successful implementation. Challenges and learning The project generated important discussions and learning. Questions raised during the PSMN presentation included whether rapid caffeine withdrawal effects had been observed. While no specific reports had been identified, the team acknowledged that individual caffeine intake prior to admission is often unknown. Alternative approaches, such as limiting caffeinated drinks to mornings only, were explored and trialled in one location by a member of the PSMN but were not found to be sustainable in practice. Another PSMN member reported that in their care home, although they had adopted the change successfully, they had not seen a reduction in toileting-related falls. This highlighted the importance of local context, fall data and ongoing evaluation over a longer time period. From local project to wider movement Following pilot work in 2024-2025, Decaf by Default was adopted Trust-wide in December 2025. Since then, interest has continued to grow across the region and beyond. The project is now being explored more widely through collaboration with: the regional NHS Alliance the North East and North Cumbria Integrated Care Board patient safety networks and quality improvement communities. There has also been increasing international interest in the concept as organisations look for low-cost, scalable interventions that may contribute to safer care environments. Alongside the Trust-wide rollout, work has also begun to extend the learning into care homes across Northumberland and North Tyneside. This has created opportunities to explore how similar approaches may support resident wellbeing and reduce risks associated with continence, sleep disturbance, anxiety and falls within community-based settings. A small community pilot project has been developed involving community nurses and Allied Health Professionals (AHPs). Participating staff carry supplies of decaffeinated tea and coffee within their clinical bags and are able to offer this as part of broader lifestyle conversations and personalised care interventions. The aim is not simply to replace drinks, but to encourage wider discussion around hydration, sleep, continence, falls prevention and anxiety management in a practical and accessible way during routine community contacts. What has perhaps resonated most strongly is that the project demonstrates how a relatively small cultural and environmental changes can stimulate wider conversations about patient safety, prevention and personalised care. Key reflections Looking back on the journey so far, several lessons stand out: Small changes can create meaningful conversations about patient safety. Organisational readiness matters as much as the intervention itself. Staff ownership and engagement are essential for sustainability. Preserving patient choice supports acceptability. Quality improvement requires curiosity, testing and adaptation. Simple interventions may have wider wellbeing benefits beyond their original aim. Most importantly, the initiative has highlighted the value of frontline teams identifying opportunities to improve care through practical, evidence-informed innovation. Related resources Go decaf! How a simple change on our wards could reduce falls, slips and trips What happened when we went decaf – the story so far How going decaf could boost patient safety by reducing falls in hospitals Patient flyer - go decaf How to join the Patient Safety Management Network You can join by signing up to the hub today. When putting in your details, please tick Patient Safety Management Network in the ‘Join a private group’ section. If you are already a member of the hub, please email [email protected]. Do you have a patient safety initiative you would like to share more widely. We'd love to hear from you and share it on the hub. Share here (you will need to be a member of the hub and signed in) or email [email protected].- Posted
-
- Patient factors
- Quality improvement
- (and 5 more)
- Last week
-
Event
This conference focuses on recognising and responding to the deteriorating patient, and ensuring best practice in the use of NEWS2. The conference will include national developments, including recommendations on NEWS2, the national PIER approach to the effective management of acute physical deterioration in health and care, the November 2025 NICE Sepsis Guidance, and implementation of Martha’s Rule. The conference will also include reflections on implementing the recommendations from the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch report Investigation into recognising and responding to critically unwell patients. For further information and to book your place visit https://www.healthcareconferencesuk.co.uk/virtual-online-courses/deteriorating-patient-summit or email [email protected] Follow the conference on X @HCUK_Clare #DeterioratingPatient hub members receive a 20% discount. Email [email protected] for a discount code. -
Event
This virtual conference focus on the role of the Coroner and preparing and attending Coroner’s Inquests. The conference will also update delegates on the implications of the 2024 Death Certification Reforms and roles, responsibilities and information flows under the new system. From preparing for an inquest, to ensuring change occurs as a result of the prevention of future death reports and local learning the conference will provide an important update on the coroner role and inquest process. For further information and to book your place visit https://www.healthcareconferencesuk.co.uk/virtual-online-courses/coroner-role or email [email protected] Follow the conference on X @HCUK_Clare #CoronerRole hub members receive a 20% discount. Email [email protected] for a discount code. -
News Article
The NHS trust at the centre of a public mental health inquiry estimates it will need to spend £30m to cover the costs of the process. The Lampard Inquiry is looking into the deaths of more than 2,000 people under Essex NHS mental health services between 2000 and 2023. Paul Scott, the former chief executive officer of Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust [EPUT], admitted the figure was "substantial" but said there was no set budget for the legal process. "Our position is we need to spend what we need to spend to serve the inquiry," he said. Scott was called back to give evidence to the inquiry, having appeared at a previous hearing. Chief counsel to the inquiry, Nicholas Griffin KC, said that EPUT had spent £13.5m up to the end of November 2025 on the Lampard Inquiry and its predecessor - the Essex Mental Health Independent Inquiry - but was forecasting a £30m spend overall. Scott left his role at the end of June to become CEO of East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, which runs Colchester and Ipswich hospitals. Bereaved families criticised the timing of his departure from EPUT when the Lampard Inquiry was still active. Scott apologised to families who had been upset by the move, but told the inquiry: "I'm here…to assure people that I'm not running from anything." He added he was "available to be accountable for my time in EPUT". Read full story Source: BBC News, 7 July 2026- Posted
-
- Mental health
- Investigation
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
CEO admits underestimating requirements of deaths inquiry
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
A trust has been slow to provide records to an inquiry examining more than 2,000 deaths, because it underestimated the resources needed, its former CEO has admitted. Paul Scott, who left Essex Partnership University Foundation Trust last month, said the trust “underestimated at the outset the scale and complexity of what would be required of it” as the main NHS trust respondent to the Lampard Inquiry. Baroness Kate Lampard is investigating more than 2,000 mental health deaths in Essex between 2000 and 2023, with her inquiry due to report in 2028. In a statement read to the inquiry on Monday afternoon, Mr Scott said: “That underestimation was not in bad faith, but rather an error of planning and resourcing in not appreciating the wide focus which would be put on the delivery of services by it and predecessor trusts. “This had real consequences: it generated delay, eroded the inquiry’s confidence, and [in some cases] directly affected bereaved families.” The problems included a failure to quickly forward 30 “next of kin” letters provided by the inquiry in February. EPUT said it was trying to validate families’ addresses, but has apologised for the unacceptable delay. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 6 July 2026- Posted
-
- Patient death
- Mental health
- (and 3 more)
-
News Article
Health officials are urgently calling on approximately one million families to ensure their children receive vital vaccinations against potentially deadly childhood diseases. The NHS has initiated a catch-up campaign targeting parents of children aged two to 11 who have missed their measles jabs. This push comes after two children in England tragically died from measles this year, amidst a significant rise in cases. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) reports 801 measles cases already this year, compared with 959 cases in 2025. The MMR/V vaccine provides crucial protection against measles, mumps, rubella, and chickenpox. General practitioners will be contacting parents of children under six to arrange these essential immunisations. Those with children aged six to 11 will be contacted via the NHS App, text, email or letter. Read full story Source: The Independent, 7 July 2026- Posted
-
- Vaccination
- Infection control
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with: