Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Integrated Care Board (ICB)'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Digital health and care service provision
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Apps for health and care
    • Teleservices
    • Other health and care software
    • Digital health regulatory bodies/standards/guidance
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Patient Safety Alerts
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Transformative Simulation
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • Patient Safety Standards
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


First name


Last name


Country


About me


Organisation


Role

Found 60 results
  1. News Article
    NHS England is developing plans to procure external expertise to help it cut the cost of the £7.5bn all-age continuing care services on a “no saving, no payment” basis. All Age Continuing Care (AACC) involves the assessment and then funding of ongoing support for eligible individuals who have long-term, complex health and social care needs. The government initially signalled that integrated care boards would lose responsibility for AACC as part of their rationalisation and shift to strategic commissioning. That decision was reversed when it became clear there was no viable alternative host at present. However, ICBs have been told to consider delegating non-statutory responsibilities. Market engagement documents on the proposed programme warn of unwanted variation of up to 2.6 times per capita across integrated care systems and a persistent national overspend on AACC of around 5%. NHSE is considering contracting suppliers to first “diagnose” the reasons behind the variation and overspend and then to undertake “targeted system-level deep dives” to resolve the problems. The engagement documents state the proposed “commercial model” would link “payment exclusively to validated, cash-releasing savings”. It adds it would result in “no new central consultancy spend” and that there would be “no payment where savings are not delivered”. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 4 June 2026
  2. News Article
    Dozens of primary care networks in some areas may need to be reorganised to take on neighbourhood contracts, because they do not cover a coherent geographic area. Of 1,210 multipractice primary care networks nationally, between 166 and 392 (14% to 32%) have member GP practices that are intermingled with others, and/or do not serve a single joined-up area, HSJ analysis has found. They make up 900-2,000 of the 6,100 total practices nationally. Five integrated care board areas – mainly in London and inner West Midlands – are particularly affected, with more than half of PCNs not serving a single joined-up patch (see below). The pattern reflects how PCNs were formed in 2019. GPs were allowed to determine networks, with little challenge from NHS England. Many were decided based on factors such as pre-existing practice relationships or common working methods. In contrast, ICBs and councils have set boundaries for neighbourhood teams largely based on municipal or other natural boundaries. For now, ICBs are mainly working around the mismatch with PCNs. In urban areas, they have set “neighbourhood” or “locality” footprints with large populations, which they say will function with multiple intermingled PCNs within them. Read full story Source: HSJ, 28 May 2026
  3. News Article
    The boss of a trust where a child recently spent over two months in A&E has urged other local system leaders to take “urgent action” to help resolve the “shameful situation” concerning vulnerable children. Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals Trust CEO Matthew Trainer said “the scale of these challenges” concerning children experiencing long waits in A&E “probably need[ed] a regional solution across London”. He has announced he will write to North East London Integrated Care Board’s CEO, Nnenna Osuji, to call for urgent action. A&Es were “increasingly becoming the default place of safety” for children either suffering mental health crises or experiencing a breakdown in their care placements, he said. He added: “This is a shameful situation, and it is getting worse every year. These children do not need hospital care. They need a place to live, but no other part of the health and care system can provide them with a roof over their heads.” Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 11 May 2026
  4. News Article
    Many medical consultants report a “mixed” experience with the advice and guidance model, saying it is “under-resourced and adding to existing backlogs”, according to research by an integrated care board. Cheshire and Merseyside ICB surveyed around 300 GPs and medical consultants about their views on the A&G model, which NHS England has said must be significantly expanded this year. A&G allows GPs to seek pre-referral advice from specialist clinicians working in secondary care, and is designed in part to reduce referrals. The ramping up of the model in recent months has been controversial among GPs, but the ICB’s survey found 54% said A&G worked “mostly well” or “very well” for them. 36% said their experience was mixed, and 10% “bad”. However, consultants were more wary: the majority – 51% – said their experience was “mixed”; 18% said it was “bad”; while 31% said it worked “well”. The ICB’s feedback report says consultants complained about having “no job-planned time” to provide the A&G, as well as “growing volumes, limited admin support, and difficulty accessing GP records”. This was “leaving A&G under-resourced and adding to existing backlogs”. Consultants also complained of “inappropriate use”, with A&G “sometimes used by [allied health professionals], trainees, and PAs for queries that should go via a GP first”. The findings added: “Many requests lack adequate history or a clear clinical question.” Although GPs were more positive, they also highlighted problems. They said A&G responses from secondary care could be “brief, contradictory, dismissive, or written by non-consultants, with some specialties slow or unresponsive”. They also highlighted that “consultants may advise referral but cannot convert A&G directly, forcing GPs to re-refer – sometimes only to be rejected again, creating duplication and patient frustration”. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 1 May 2026
  5. Content Article
    The 10 Year Health Plan sets out an ambition to build a truly modern NHS that delivers better treatment for patients and better value for taxpayers. To realise this vision, we must deliver services in new ways that better meet patients’ needs, and provide care as close to home as possible, in a way that is most convenient for them and gives them what they need when they need it. As set out in the Neighbourhood Health Framework, this will mean improving routine healthcare services, moving to a more proactive care model for people with multiple long-term conditions and delivering better alternatives to hospital care. Commissioning reform and development will support integrated care boards (ICBs) to become more expert strategic commissioners, moving to a population health approach that aligns incentives, reduces fragmentation and addresses the imbalance of resources. Commissioners will increasingly use population-based contract models to enable providers to work together to deliver joined-up care. Delivering this vision does not require disruptive organisational change. This publication sets out new population health delivery models to facilitate this change, supporting ICBs to commission providers around the needs of defined populations. ICBs – working with partners, including local authorities and health and wellbeing boards – will agree neighbourhood footprints that form clearly defined populations. Single neighbourhood, multi-neighbourhood and integrated health organisation contracts will be commissioned around these populations. Single neighbourhood providers (SNPs) will deliver services, through integrated neighbourhood teams, within a defined single neighbourhood, enabling primary care to take on new neighbourhood services that are not contracted through today’s general practice contracts – General Medical Services (GMS), Personal Medical Services (PMS) or Alternative Provider Medical Services (APMS) – which will continue to be determined nationally and commissioned locally. Multi-neighbourhood providers (MNPs) will co-ordinate the consistent delivery of services across multiple neighbourhoods. This may include delivering services directly at a larger scale than a neighbourhood or by ‘filling in’ services where an SNP is not willing or able to. Integrated health organisation (IHO) contracts will give providers a whole population health budget for a geographically defined population, underpinned by a contract. The model will empower highly capable providers to lead change through their understanding of local population need, knowledge of activity and costs, and ability to engage frontline clinicians in service redesign. IHOs will undo needless NHS fragmentation and create incentives to invest in community-based preventative care.
  6. Content Article
    This briefing from Arthritis UK finds that almost a fifth (19%) of integrated care boards (ICBs) in England are rationing joint replacement surgery by disadvantaging patients with a higher body mass index (BMI). A further 54.7% have policies that restrict or alter access to surgery in some other way for those with overweight or obesity. Not only are these policies unfair, but they also contradict National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines and government policy. Arthritis UK is calling for all ICBs to stop using these policies and stop rationing surgery based on a person’s BMI.
  7. News Article
    An integrated care board is rethinking its approach to crisis mental health care after “confusion” contributed towards the deaths of four people. Multiple trusts in Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB raised concerns about the “Right Care Right Person” (RCRP) policy, a national agreement between police and the NHS, which means that police should not need to attend a mental health-related incident unless there is a risk to life. North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare Trust and Midlands Partnership University Foundation Trust told the ICB that police support was “not forthcoming” on several occasions and that “harm was potentially being caused because of this”. Last year, coroners issued multiple warnings following a series of deaths linked to the controversial national policy, which was introduced despite concerns in the NHS and from patient groups. The ICB commissioned a joint thematic review of four cases between October 2024 and March 2025, where people were found dead, and the RCRP process may not have been followed. The review was finished at the end of last year and has only now been released to HSJ under the Freedom of Information Act. Findings included that “system challenges” contributed to delays in gaining access to patients’ properties to check on them when there was a concern for their safety. The review found that while RCRP had been launched by the trusts involved, “there were a number of healthcare staff in the community and in hospitals who were not fully aware or had a full understanding of the process and its needs and requirements”. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 31 March 2026
  8. News Article
    NHS England’s national medical director has warned health campaigners against demanding “unhelpful” new national rules and mandates, as power was moving to local integrated care boards. Claire Fuller told the Pathways from Homelessness conference in London that she was against central mandates because “we have never really made anything better by making anything rigid”. She said the shift of ICBs to becoming strategic commissioners will give them a “greater understanding of their population” need and empower them to “commission services more appropriately, and in theory, move the money around to match it”. Dr Fuller, who was chief executive of Surrey Heartlands ICB before joining NHSE, said: “The way you increase your voice is by coming together with a single message… the more we connect you through the national [neighbourhood health] pilots, the national programmes that are going on, the stronger it gets. “But you have to remember: as passionate as the people are in this room, there are probably twelve other rooms meeting around the country today [that are] equally passionate about what they care about and [concerned about] causing harm because we are getting it wrong… “The more we can not lobby as individual groups, and the more we can lobby for the things that make care better because we know that is true, the more we will get to… reducing the inequalities that go around.” Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 25 March 2026
  9. News Article
    Nearly half of integrated care boards (ICBs) opted out of the 2025 Staff Survey, and those that took part saw a huge drop in morale amid restructuring. The 2025 data covers just 23 ICBs, because the remaining 19 decided not to take part amid major restructures. The share agreeing they “would recommend my organisation as a place to work”, on average across the ICBs, plummeted from 54% to 36.9%. It was already lower than most provider trusts. Drastic cuts to ICB budgets and a narrowing of their role were announced a year ago, followed by months of uncertainty and redundancy schemes running over the winter. Many ICBs have merged their leadership with neighbours. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 13 March 2026 Related reading on the hub: Patient Safety Learning’s response to the NHS Staff Survey Results 2025
  10. Content Article
    The 10-Year Health Plan’s promise to spread best practice through greater transparency risks falling short. Many integrated care boards (ICBs) lack the basic data needed to track whether services meet national standards or identify what works best. The latest report from the Medical Technology Group on best practice sets out to examine this, looking at how NHS systems presently define, measure and spread good practice across four vital, but neglected, clinical areas: diagnostics, orthopaedics, gynaecology, and continence. Drawing on Freedom of Information responses from 42 ICBs, it found often a system that cannot learn because it does not have a full and accurate picture of what is really happening on the ground. The report shows that many ICB leaders lack the basic information required to judge whether their key services meet national standards, let alone whether they are delivering the best possible outcomes for patients. Both systemic infrastructure and data are lacking, with the latter often sitting fragmented across providers.
  11. News Article
    National policymakers are “working it out as they go along”, and integrated care board staff are “on their knees” amid a confused restructure, local leaders have reported. A Health Foundation report based on interviews with integrated care board leaders throughout last year, shared exclusively with HSJ, found they were “scathing” about the “handling and subsequent management” of the announcement of 50% cuts to staffing budgets. ICB leaders who spoke to researchers labelled the cuts as “disgraceful”, “unprofessional”, and “an absolute shitshow”. They described surprise at “manager bashing” from government and concern that this would deter “the next generation of managers” from joining the NHS. Leaders also described ICB colleagues as being “on their knees” and having “terrible, terrible morale”, and raised questions about the future of partnership working and ICBs as organisations. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 11 March 2026
  12. Content Article
    Based on in-depth interviews with local leaders, this report from the Health Foundation explores the development and evolving role of integrated care systems (ICSs) in England, and asks what policy changes are needed to help deliver their objectives. The Labour government’s plans for the health service centre on achieving three broad shifts: more community-based care, prevention and use of digital technology. They also involve another round of NHS restructuring, including major changes to ICSs – the area-based agencies responsible for planning and coordinating services. Drawing on research conducted throughout 2025, this report provides detailed insights into local leaders’ views as the national policy context rapidly evolved around them. Overall, leaders in the research supported the broad goals of Labour’s reforms – including the shift from hospital to community – but had varied interpretations of what they meant in practice and major concerns about delivery. Policy changes introduced throughout 2025, including scrapping NHS England, cutting ICB budgets, merging ICBs across larger geographical areas and redefining the role of ICSs, were also causing widespread disruption and distracting ICS leaders from delivering on the government’s three shifts. Standing back, reforms to ICSs should not undermine the cross-sector collaboration needed to tackle the major health challenges facing the nation. Better planning and communication of the government’s reforms are now needed to avoid further disruption and distraction at local level. Policymakers will also need to actively construct the ‘strategic commissioners’ that they want ICBs to become – developing skills and capabilities within local systems and backing them with broader policy changes that make the ambition to shift resources out of hospital a reality.
  13. Content Article
    A significant number of the NHS’s national leaders – including some who have made reassuring noises – privately believe that the jury is very much still out on integrated care boards. This HSJ opinion pieces discusses whether integrated care boards have a future.
  14. Content Article
    This year will mark the publication of the first comprehensive Quality Strategy for the NHS in over fifteen years. In this blog, Patient Safety Learning and the Advancing Quality Alliance (Aqua) set out the need for safety to serve as a golden thread woven throughout the Strategy. The 10-Year Health Plan for England presents a significant opportunity to improve patient care, experiences, and outcomes. It is expected that the forthcoming NHS Quality Strategy will seek to deliver these improvements by placing a system wide focus on quality. We believe that improving patient safety is inextricably linked to this aim. Level of avoidable harm Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, NHS England stated in its Patient Safety Strategy that there were around 11,000 avoidable deaths annually due to safety concerns, with thousands more patients seriously harmed.[1] Separately, a 2026 report from the Institute of Global Health Innovation has suggested that 22,789 lives could be saved if the UK matched the rate of treatable mortality of Switzerland.[2] In practice, both these sets of figures are likely to significantly underestimate the scale of harm given the ongoing enormous strain faced by the healthcare system in recent years. Particularly when also considering the pressures in service provision in primary care, emergency and urgent care and discharge planning with social care. This is an unnecessary tragedy for patients, families, and healthcare professionals. Cost of unsafe care This level of avoidable harm is also accompanied by a huge financial cost. The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) has estimated that the direct cost of treating patients who have been harmed during their care in high-income countries approaches 13% of health spending.[3] Excluding cases of avoidable harm that may not be preventable, this figure is 8.7% of health expenditure. NHS Resolution estimated that the “annual cost of harm” of clinical negligence claims alone in England in 2024/25 was £4.6 billion.[4] The problems created by unsafe care also undermine efforts to improve quality by increasing productivity. Avoidable harm and its consequences are inherently inefficient, leading to longer inpatient stays, higher staff turnover, reputational damage and reduced trust by patients and the public in the NHS. Improving safety to deliver improvement Patient Safety Learning and Aqua believe that improving patient safety should be a key cornerstone for creating a more effective and productive health system. This means that we should be designing for safety, to ensure safe outcomes, processes, and behaviours. We should know ‘what good looks like’ for safe care and apply this knowledge rigorously and transparently.[5] This should include: Improving the quality of patient safety reviews and investigations. Sharing learning widely and translating this into tangible improvements. Nurturing an open and restorative culture in the NHS. Listening to patients, families, and staff, to better understand risk, take action to prevent harm and give redress and support to people harmed. Board level oversight and reporting of safety incidents, reviews and learning applied. Greater use of technology, data and analytics to significantly improve the safety, effectiveness and responsiveness of care delivery.[6] We also believe it is important to embrace safety science and not oversimplify complex issues. We must respond to delivering safer ‘work as done’ and not be comforted by revising unrealistic and unachievable ‘work as imagined’.[7] Moving towards a safer healthcare system Leadership will be essential to driving these safety improvements. The creation of a new Quality Strategy presents a valuable opportunity for organisational and system leaders to embrace an integrated approach to patient safety. They should encourage a culture of openness and transparency among staff and patients regarding safety issues and related recommendations, while ensuring that safety and quality remain balanced priorities. We need to find better ways of working within organisations and across patient pathways and systems to design and deliver safer outcomes. We too often remain siloed in our response to avoidable harm and must share and work together to design system-wide solutions. There is a huge opportunity for Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) to drive a systemic approach to patient safety through their strategic commissioning responsibilities.[8] [9] There is however currently significant variation in ICBs involvement in safety management activities.[10] We believe they could take on a clear leadership role for system safety. This could have the potential to develop an integrated and coordinated approach to safety, reflecting patient care pathways across systems and ensuring consistency and collaboration. Patient Safety Learning and Aqua look forward to reviewing the Quality Strategy and contributing to its implementation, ensuring that patient safety is integral to how we design and deliver a transformed health care system. Get in touch For organisations wanting to engage in our work and networks, please contact us at: Aqua: [email protected] & 0161 206 8938 Patient Safety Learning: [email protected] References NHS England. The NHS Patient Safety Strategy: Safer culture, safer systems, safer patients. July 2019. Institute of Global Health Innovation & Patient Safety Watch. National State of Patient Safety 2025: Prioritising improvement efforts in a system under stress. 29 January 2026. OECD and Saudi Patient Safety Centre. The Economics of Patient Safety. From analysis to action. 21 October 2020. NHS Resolution. NHS Resolution annual report and accounts 2024 to 2025. 17 July 2025. Patient Safety Learning. ‘What Good Looks Like’ in patient safety. Last accessed 23 February 2026. Alex Kafetz. Why data on quality of care is now more important than ever. 17 February 2026. Claire Cox. Putting the writing on the wall: Explaining work as imagined vs work as done. 1 August 2023. Aqua. What Should Safety Look Like at a System Level. 6 April 2023. Patient Safety Learning. The elephant in the room: Patient safety and integrated care systems. 11 July 2023. Health Services Safety Investigations Body. Safety management: accountability across organisational boundaries. 13 February 2025.
  15. Content Article
    Since its introduction in 1990, the commissioning layer of the NHS has been the most reorganised part of the health service, and it is changing once again. In this article for the Nuffield Trust, Nigel Edwards reviews the lessons to learn from the past and describes what needs to happen for ICB-led strategic commissioning to succeed where previous models have fallen short.
  16. Content Article
    In October 2024, the NHS Confederation’s ICS Network gathered the views of integrated care board (ICB) leaders on the future of provider oversight. Through this exercise, we sought to clarify the position of different members and the degree of consensus that exists across ICBs in relation to the oversight framework and wider operating model.
  17. News Article
    NHS England is revising its new performance framework yet again, with a focus on slashing 77 indicators down to core priorities. Its board signed off a version of the NHS Performance Assessment Framework just six weeks ago for consultation. But HSJ understands engagement on that iteration was delayed as officials wanted to overhaul it again. The March version moved integrated care boards’ regulatory performance management role to regional teams, and promised to “prevent providers being bombarded with conflicting instructions”. But it still listed 77 “delivery metrics”, covering operating objectives; finance and productivity; public health and patient outcomes; quality and inequalities. New proposals expected this week will include significantly stripping the measures down, to primarily focus on headline performance and delivery asks in the 2025-26 planning guidance. That document axed numerous targets and asked, which health and social care secretary Wes Streeting said would allow more local autonomy. The new version will also seek to further clarify the changing roles of ICBs, providers, regions and the centre. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 12 May 2025
  18. News Article
    A “blueprint” for integrated care board cost-cuts says “headcount should be reduced at board level”. The “model ICB blueprint” issued by NHS England says the organisations should “look to streamline boards to deliver [their] core role”. HSJ understands the biggest reductions in board members are expected to come from ”greater collaboration” such as shared roles, and “clustering” of integrated care board leadership in many regions – expected to involve sharing of chairs and CEOs. Discussions about consolidation are already well underway in several regions, although NHSE understands formal mergers are likely to be delayed until at least next year. The blueprint document indicates ICBs must also remove some board posts which are linked to functions being axed or transferred. These functions include performance management, workforce, and “digital leadership and transformation”. The guidance says ICBs should “streamline” boards “with the right roles and profiles to deliver core Model ICB functions”. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 6 May 2025
  19. News Article
    More than a dozen functions have been earmarked for “transfer” out of integrated care boards, including workforce planning, primary care, and digital leadership. Several of them will transfer to emerging “neighbourhood health providers”, according to NHS England’s new “model ICB blueprint”, which is meant to help the boards cut 50% from their overheads. The document also orders integrated care boards to reduce their board-level headcount to focus on ”core model ICB priorities”. The document names 18 functions and activities which ICBs should “transfer [out] over time”, six they should “selectively retain and adapt”, and 11 which should “grow”. NHSE financial reset and accountability director Glen Burley, who has been overseeing the work so far, told HSJ it was a “first step in a joint programme of work to reshape the focus, role, and functions of ICBs”. “We are seeking to reduce the management costs of the NHS so that more money can be spent on the frontline,” he said. “This won’t be achieved by simply moving functions to different organisations – instead ICBs need to be working together to merge functions to cut duplication.” Read full story Source: HSJ, 6 May 2025
  20. News Article
    NHS-funded access to private autism and ADHD services is “unsustainable” and “up to three times more expensive than our local provision”, according to an integrated care board’s review. Northamptonshire ICB found the use of independent providers under “right to choose” rules for diagnosis and treatment of autism and ADHD was expected to cost it £3m in 2024-25, according to the document obtained by HSJ. This represents an additional 66% on top of its £4.5m budget for its commissioned autism and ADHD services. Extremely long waits, rocketing demand, and a growing market nationally have seen a big rise in people exercising choice rules, which require commissioners to pay for treatment if a provider has a contract with at least one other ICB. In its review of community paediatric services, the ICB said its spending growth on the independent sector is “unsustainable” as “costs are up to three times more expensive than our local provision”. NHS funding of the same services is effectively capped as they are on “block” contracts. The review was completed in December and recently released after a Freedom of Information request. Government has deprioritised tackling long waits for these services, but NHS England last year launched a national taskforce on the issue. The ICB’s review warned any “national solution will almost certainly involve greater use of the independent provider market”, which it said was less cost-effective than its commissioned services. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 6 May 2025
  21. News Article
    A leading midwife and chair of government maternity inquiries has cited “significant concern about safety and wellbeing” following a substantial cut to nationally ring-fenced funding. The concerns follow more than £90m of service development funding being cut from maternity allocations and transferred into core integrated care board budgets in 2025-26, as revealed by HSJ this week. NHS England said “maternity care remains a top priority” and it was “misleading” to suggest otherwise. But leading maternity safety campaigners and royal colleges expressed concerns that funding will now be lost because of deficits and competing demands. NHSE 2025-26 planning guidance says organisations must still “improve safety in maternity and neonatal services, delivering the key actions of the ‘three-year delivery plan’”, as well as “paying particular attention to challenged and fragile services, including maternity and neonatal”. Donna Ockenden, a former senior midwife, who chaired a government-commissioned review into maternity failings in Shropshire and is currently leading its inquiry into Nottingham Hospitals, said on social media site X: “Talking to colleagues across perinatal services, the sense of disappointment is profound, with everyone I’ve spoken to tonight expressing significant concern about safety and the wellbeing of children and mental health.” Influential safety campaigner James Titcombe said the move was “pulling in the opposite direction to promises health and social care secretary Wes Streeting had made to families failed by poor maternity care”. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 1 May 2025
  22. News Article
    Medicines management teams should not be targeted by imminent cost cuts and must remain a “fundamental component” of the new model for integrated care boards, NHS England has been told. An open letter sent on behalf of ICB chief pharmacists to the new NHS England leadership last week stressed the need to keep tight control of the service’s £20bn medicines spend. ICBs have been told they must cut their running costs in half by October, and there is considerable debate at local and national level over where the axe should fall. The letter said: “Prescribing is one of the most volatile expenditures in the NHS, and we are collectively keen to work with you to maintain grip on the management of this precious resource.” The letter’s authors claim ICB medicines management teams made savings worth £500m in 2024-25. Reducing spend on medicines - which is the second-largest area of NHS expenditure after staffing - features prominently in ICB cost improvement plans across the country. The letter continues: “We recognise that we need to continue to transform how the system and individual people use medicines effectively (including alternatives to prescribing).” This requires, it suggested, “professional pharmacy leadership in all sectors” to “navigate the conflicting complexities of supporting financial balance”. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 25 April 2025
  23. News Article
    Integrated care boards have been told to significantly strengthen the drive to ensure that potential GP referrals are first scrutinised by hospital consultants. The approach, known as “advice and guidance”, involves GPs discussing cases with specialist consultants. The discussions can lead to the patient being triaged to alternative services or the GP continuing to be responsible for their management, rather than being placed on a waiting list to see a consultant. The use of A&G to reduce referrals is a key plank of NHS England’s plan to deal with the elective care backlog. NHSE’s elective reform plan pledged to drive up A&G requests by GPs to 4 million in 2025-26, nearly double the amount seen in 2023-24. NHSE forecasts this would deliver 2 million “diversions” – cases where a referral is avoided. For the first time, GPs will be paid £20 each time they use the model, and the government has announced that an £80m pot has been allocated to fund the policy. But new guidance published by NHS England warns local systems must deliver a “higher degree of rigour and standardisation” in their A&G services. It also sounds the alarm about the “considerable variation” in A&G models operating in different areas. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 17 April 2025
  24. News Article
    NHS England has proposed introducing “minimum waiting times” for certain elective specialties as system leaders grapple with how to balance clinical needs and a real terms funding cut for local services. The proposal was revealed in changes to the NHS Standard Contract for 2025-26, published by NHSE on Thursday, following the decision to ditch plans for a fixed cap on providers’ elective activity earnings. This was how government and NHSE had planned to control costs in 2025-26, but it was branded “unworkable” by providers. However, the Nuffield Trust warned the new proposals – out for consultation with a 28 April deadline – gave “no clear process to rationally decide which forms of activity it is least harmful to hold down and which, if necessary, should be permitted to exceed plans”. The new contracting plan is based on the principle of commissioners agreeing “robust indicative activity plans” with providers under arrangements NHSE said required “material changes [to the] contract activity management provisions”. The document also confirms that NHSE is proposing the introduction of minimum waiting times where local commissioners view this as appropriate. It is due to concern some providers carry out a large volume of certain procedures with short turnarounds – for example a few days – while commissioners may be unable to afford to address much longer waits for other services. The plan says commissioners could set “activity planning assumptions” about “how the particular provider will manage activity once a referral has been accepted”. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 11 April 2025
  25. News Article
    An integrated care board in the East of England is working to integrate general practice and dental care records, and exploring shared sites for the two primary care services. Suffolk and North East Essex ICB is exploring how to “bring primary care services together”, according to recent board papers. Ed Garratt, its chief executive, said dental practices first began to collaborate through the ICB’s dental priority access and stabilisation scheme, which saw them offer 15,000 urgent appointments. “We’re now thinking about how to create networks of dental practices that could work together with our general practice networks,” he told HSJ. He added that the ICB was also pursuing integrating the summary care record – a patient record held by GPs – so it could be shared with dentists. Mr Garratt said having GPs and dentists working at the same hub sites was likely to be “the ultimate end stage” for this work. He said the moves were designed to improve communication and holistic care across dental and other health. “Often, dentists and GPs might share the same patient, but they would never communicate about that patient. So you can have more holistic care potentially if people were working closer together,” he said. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 10 April 2025 Further reading on the hub: The challenges of navigating the healthcare system
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.