Jump to content
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Kenny Fraser

Members

Reputation

4 Novice

Profile Information

  • First name
    Kenny
  • Last name
    Fraser
  • Country
    United Kingdom

About me

  • About me
    I run a digital health startup called Triscribe. We are building analytics and AI that support clinicians in delivering safe use of medication.
  • Organisation
    Triscribe
  • Role
    Director

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Community Post
    Shortages are an issue we hear about regularly from hospitals. Triscribe role is mainly about trying to give pharmacists and procurement teams better information to understand shortage risks.
  2. Content Article Comment
    That's really useful Clive and it explains a lot. Unfortunately, NPFIT was a bad idea from a very different era of technology. I suspect that legacy is causing some challenges.
  3. Content Article Comment
    Thanks for summarising this Clive. I guess it raises a couple of questions in my mind. 1. Not having EPRs (and other basic electronic systems) is also a risk to patient safety. I know there are many gaps in many hospitals where paper records are still in use. Has there ever been any assessment of the risks this poses? 2. The NHS has some fairly demanding and detailed processes and standards for ensuring the safety of IT systems for example DTAC and the various medical device regulations that apply. This suggest to me these are ineffective. Rather than add another layer of complexity to address the points raised, is it time to take a step back? Simplify, clarify and modernise how we use IT to actually help staff and improve patient care.
  4. Event Comment

    until

    Looks like an interesting event. Apparently medicines account for 25% of the NHS carbon footprint. Goodness knows how they arrive at that number since there seems to be very little data on the actual carbon footprint of medicines. One of my ideas for Triscribe is to help change this.
  5. Content Article Comment
    This report highlights and important problem which has implications well beyond the role of ICSs. I agree with the conclusion that safety should be a fifth aim of ICSs and I would extend that to include patient and staff safety. I am not sure the other recommendations will make a real difference. Clarifying and updating remits seems like housekeeping to me. One of the fundamental problems with ICSs is that they become simply another layer of bureaucracy and management. This report illustrates the risks confusion of purpose presents for patient safety. Why not recommend that some of these committees and bodies be abolished. Replace them with a clear role for ICSs to improve patient safety.
  6. Community Post
    Thanks Clive - love to hear thoughts from those dealing with this in clinical practice
  7. Community Post
    NHS hospital staff spend countless hours capturing data in electronic prescribing and medicines administration systems. Yet that data remains difficult to access and use to support patient care. This is a tremendous opportunity to improve patient safety, drive efficiencies and save time for frontline staff. I have just published a post about this challenge and Triscribe's solution. I would love to hear any comments or feedback on the topic... How could we use this information better? What are hospitals already doing? Where are the gaps? Thanks
  8. Content Article
    NHS hospital staff spend countless hours capturing data in electronic prescribing and medicines administration systems. Yet that data remains difficult to access and use to support patient care. This is a tremendous opportunity to improve patient safety, drive efficiencies and save time for frontline staff. In this blog, Kenny Fraser, CEO of Triscribe, explains why we need to deliver quick, low-cost improvement using modern, open source software tools and techniques. We don’t need schemes and standards or metrics and quality control. The most important thing is to build software for the needs and priorities of frontline pharmacists, doctors and nurses. A study in 2018 found that 237 million medication errors occur each year in the NHS in England alone. Three quarters of these cause harm and there are 1,700–22,303 deaths from avoidable adverse drug reactions. Two things immediately strike me about these numbers: Medication safety is a huge issue. The breadth of the estimate suggests that data about the scale and impact of medication safety errors are incomplete and unreliable. I have not seen a similar published study since. My experience working with NHS hospitals since 2018 suggests slow progress. There are four reasons: The spaghetti medusa of data. Millions of staff hours spent to capture and store medicines data in a variety of legacy siloed hospital systems such as EPMA, pharmacy stock and EPR. The NHS employs 1.5 million people and at least the same number again work in social care. Yet there are almost no tools specifically built for either NHS or social care workers. Slow progress of clumsy digital initiatives that focus on the wrong thing, made worse by the fear of digital monsters. Lack of change and innovation. Lots of noise around schemes and gateways rather than actual solutions for real people. Layer the pandemic impact over these underlying issues and the position seems hopeless. It's not. “Data isn’t oil, it’s sand.” The tech industry has invested trillions of dollars and the time of millions of the world’s smartest experts. Much of this goes into solutions that capture and use epic quantities of data. Over the past 15 years, multiple standard, open source software tools and techniques have emerged that tackle exactly this kind of problem. Behind all the hype, hysteria and scaremongering, the current AI boom is just a manifestation of all this money and intellectual capital. It is outrageous that this is not used for the benefit of hard pressed frontline hospital staff. So what does this mean in practice? How can tools, like Triscribe, actually improve medication safety? Those 237 million errors include a lot of different things. Adverse drug reactions are just a small portion and the severe reactions are pretty rare. Using the existing data collected from a multiplicity of systems, we believe that more meaningful analysis is possible by: Reporting of adverse drug risks updated at least daily. Note: using a little AI, we can predict the risk of adverse drug reactions and give clinicians the information needed to stop at least some from happening. Much better than just reporting the incidents. Monitoring adherence key safety policies and guidelines. For example, VTE prophylaxis, allergy reviews and oxygen prescribing. Tracking and reporting late and omitted doses every day across all systems, including ward comparisons to identify learning and share better ways of working. Safe use indicators for specific medications; for example, early/ late administration of Parkinson’s medicines and opioid deprescribing. Reporting key compliance measures, including IV to oral switching for antibiotics, high dose prescribing of opioids and usage of methotrexate The possibilities are limitless. There is no shortage of data in the NHS. However, the ability to share that data between systems and organisations is something the health and care sector still lacks. It’s a solvable problem. Deliver quick, low-cost improvement using modern, open source software tools and techniques. We don’t need schemes and standards or metrics and quality control. The most important thing is to build software for the needs and priorities of frontline pharmacists, doctors and nurses. Keep learning and keep improving every day.
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.