Sam

The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) arguably represents the most significant change to investigating and managing patient safety incidents in the history of the NHS. To embed PSIRF effectively within organisations, healthcare teams need to understand and utilise a range of new techniques and disciplines. Clinical audit is an established quality improvement methodology that is often overlooked by patient safety teams, but will play an increasingly important role in ensuring that PSIRF fully delivers its stated objectives. CQC reports often highlight the importance of clinical audit as a measurement and assurance tool that can raise red flags if used appropriately. Indeed, both the Ockenden and Kirkup reports highlighted the importance of clinical audit in identifying and quantifying substandard care. While SEIPS, After Action Reviews, more in-depth interviewing techniques, etc. are all receiving much fanfare in relation to PSIRF, the importance of clinical audit needs to be better understood. This short course will explain how organisations who use clinical audit effectively will increase patient safety and better understand why incidents take place. We will look at the key role of audit in understanding work as imagined and works as done and show why national audits can assist with creating patient safety plans. Change analysis and the effective implementation of safety actions are keys to PSIRF delivery and clinical audit will assist in the delivery of both. We will also demonstrate the important, but often under-appreciated role, clinical audit staff will have in the successful delivery of PSIRF. Key Learning Outcomes: Why clinical audit is an integral element of PSIRF. Why clinical audit staff have a vital role to play in PSIRF. How clinical audit data can help raise red flags and spot risks. Using clinical audit to better understand your incidents. Ensuring your safety actions are working. Using audit to assess your patient safety incident investigations. Register hub members receive a 20% discount. Email [email protected] for discount code.

Any staff with responsibility for implementing the duty of candour and/or PSIRF and those responsible for quality; safety; clinical governance; safety investigations; complaints; CQC compliance; or patient experience/ involvement would benefit from attending this one-day training. The course will provide participants with an in-depth knowledge and understanding of how to not only comply with the duty of candour and the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF), but to do so in an emotionally intelligent way, with empathy and compassion for all involved. Practical guidance on complying with the regulations and guidance The “grey areas” and what people most often get wrong Using emotional intelligence to understand the difficult emotions experienced by patients/those closest to them and staff following patient safety incidents What empathy and compassion mean in practice Handling difficult and emotive conversations well Making a meaningful apology How Duty of Candour and PSIRF work alongside other policies and procedures including complaints; litigation; Martha’s Rule and the soon to be introduced “Hillsborough Law” How the new “Harmed Patient Pathway” can help you get it right 7 How to ensure communication moves beyond compliance and frameworks but remains emotionally intelligent and personal Register hub members receive a 20% discount. Email [email protected] for discount code.

This one-day masterclass focuses on the Principles and Practice of a Restorative, Just, and Learning Culture, emphasising how empathy is crucial to fostering a fair and psychologically safe environment. Through experiential learning using a true story, participants will have the opportunity to see things differently; examining how empathy and compassionate leadership underpin a Just Culture, helping organisations move from blame to learning, accountability, and system improvement. Using candid video material between facilitator, Carolyn Cleveland and Dr Chris Turner, Emergency Medicine Consultant and Co-Founder of Civility Saves Lives, potential divide of lived experience, psychology, frontline healthcare and governance is bridged. The session will bring empathic thinking into real-life practice, guiding attendees to understand the emotional complexities of patient safety incidents, staff fears and wellbeing and working with human reactions. It will highlight the difference between retributive and restorative practices and how adopting restorative approaches can enhance both patient and staff outcomes. In a safe, supportive environment, participants will reflect on how personal biases affect communication, and explore how culture change can be achieved and the challenges. The session will integrate self-reflection activities to strengthen personal well-being, emotional resilience, and inclusive leadership skills, which are vital for creating a compassionate, high-performing team. Using emotive and thought provoking material, balanced with the science of emotional intelligence, the real impact of a restorative, just and learning culture principles are felt, ensuring attendees leave with actionable insights, combined with emotional understanding to drive systemic change in their teams and wider organisations. Register hub members receive a 20% discount. Email [email protected] for discount code.

This interactive and practical course will provide a structured approach to investigating falls. You will be guided through gathering the evidence, conducting a detailed analysis of the issues and production of the final report using a blame-free, systems-based approach. This one-day training session will equip delegates with the skills to manage and investigate different types off falls. The day will be case study led and delegates will have the opportunity to ask questions pertaining to their own area of practice. Different types of learning responses will be explored, such as PSII, AAR, Swarm Huddles and thematic reviews. KEY LEARNING OBJECTIVES: What is a slip, a trip and a fall? Choosing different types of learning responses. How to recognise the systemic, human, intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated with different types of falls. Undertaking effective site visits. Focus on organisational learning through systemic analysis. Practical report writing skills. Register hub members receive a 20% discount. Email [email protected] for discount code.

In a recent blog for the hub, #ThereForME explored the barriers that impact access to NHS care for people with ME (myalgic encephalomyelitis) and Long Covid and encouraged the patient community to share their experiences with the hub. In this blog, Samantha Warne, the hub Lead Editor, highlights the main themes that came out of those experiences, and the actions patients with ME and Long Covid feel could make a big difference to their care. Key themes: Lack of energy to make and attend appointments. Reasonable adjustments not being made. Insufficient infection control measures. A need for greater knowledge and empathy from healthcare professionals. For people with ME and Long Covid, accessing healthcare, whether for these or other conditions, can be challenging. It can be difficult to receive care without risking a deterioration in symptoms, especially when reasonable adjustments are not made to minimise the exertion involved.[1] Having read all the stories shared on the hub, there are common themes that stand out. I have grouped these themes below with examples. This is just a snapshot of the stories shared, and I encourage you read them all on our community thread. Lack of energy to make and attend appointments One of the challenges that strongly came through was the energy needed to navigate a complex and challenging health system, which patients with ME and Long Covid often simply don’t have. A trip to the hospital or a GP can involve public transport, long walks from the bus stop to the clinic, waiting rooms that are crowded and noisy, often without enough chairs which may mean standing for extended periods.[2] The temperature and lighting can also affect the patient. There are a range of issues that can potentially make a hospital or GP surgery difficult for someone with ME or Long Covid and they can become very exhausting environments. “6 weeks post-covid, bedbound but able to do a few things, my GP sent an ambulance to take me to hospital for tests. I was left in a noisy corridor all day … All tests were done one after the other, with minimal rest in between.” There is then the 'intense' conversations requiring cognition, often having to explain your condition multiple times to clinicians lacking a basic understanding of ME and core symptoms like post-exertional malaise. And then there are the tests that involve getting on and off beds and holding awkward positions. “For a day patient procedure, I had to explain ME and what it meant to two nurses at the pre-op appointment, two nurses and a healthcare assistant at the hospital on admittance, and then even to the surgeon and anaesthetist. I could barely speak by the time the procedure took place.“ This can not only cause suffering at the time, but also in some cases shared with us continued to impact the patient after. “Our hospital is a 3 hour round trip, so the energy required to attend is huge with days or weeks of payback.” Trying to make an appointment at a suitable time can also be a challenge. As a result of the well documented existing pressures facing the health service, patients can often find it difficult to book healthcare appointments. [3][4] These challenges can be exacerbated due to constraints of the 9–5 system. People have shared with us that in some cases this can be impossible. “I cannot do morning appointments as I need the option to lie in if I have a bad night’s sleep.” It’s also extremely difficult to plan an appointment as the patient doesn’t know how they will be feeling on the day, and, as many highlighted, there appears to be little understanding about ME and Long Covid. There is a lack of flexibility in appointment timing or understanding that a patient might need to delay their care to ensure sufficient space to recover between appointments. Patients may also face added stress due to being disbelieved or feeling that the disabling impact of their condition is dismissed during medical encounters, adding another drain on their scarce energy.[5] “ We have to assess if the use of very limited energy is worth it. Interactions with an NHS system that is uneducated in ME can be extremely stressful, upsetting, creating a deterioration in health and even be harmful.” Reasonable adjustments not being made Many people who shared their stories on the hub highlighted the lack of reasonable adjustments made for them, particularly the unavailability of home visits, which as outlined above, would help reduce the energy spent on attending appointments at the hospital or GP surgery. However, sadly these adjustments are usually not made: “It took years of advocating to access blood tests at home as my GP surgery repeatedly denied that I was housebound. I paid a private nurse to take my bloods instead.” This is a patient safety concern as often patients are not getting the appointments, tests and screening they should, not only for their ME or Long Covid symptoms, but for other routine health checks too, such as cancer screening, dentist and eye appointments, and treatment for other illnesses. Below are just some of the many experiences shared with us: “I have had zero health care of any sort since I became housebound in 2018 following cancer treatment. I have had no follow up mammograms since then (should be yearly). I spoke to the national screening service (Scotland) to try to address this as I've had breast cancer twice now; the conclusion was that if I needed any treatment as I couldn't access the hospital they could do nothing-–at no point was any attempt made to help me access the hospital.” “I am supposed to attend an eye clinic every year to be monitored for glaucoma. When I explained I wasn't well enough to attend they removed me from their list of people to monitor. I feel I've completely lost access to health and dental care.” “My smear test is 4 years overdue and I have not been able to access it because I am housebound and my GP surgery will not offer a home visit for it.” A&E departments are especially poorly equipped to deal with ME patients: “I was unfortunate to have to visit A&E 10 days post knee replacement with a possible DVT. There were no allowances made at all for my ME and even at times for my recent knee replacement. Bright lights, walking long distances on crutches, 10 hour wait on first visit and 6 hour waits on two subsequent visits to SDEC (same day emergency care), being forced to ask for a seat to sit on, nothing to put my leg up on, nobody to get me a drink when the trolley came until another patient relative saw my predicament … I didn’t feel safe and I didn’t feel cared for… “ Lack of infection control measures Many patients said that they did not feel safe going into their GP surgery or hospital due to the lack of infection control measures in place, with staff rarely wearing face masks and poor ventilation in the buildings. “Healthcare settings are so dangerous for us while airborne infections are not mitigated against.“ They expressed that this can be terrifying for people with Long Covid and ME as one infection could cause serious problems. "I also hate going to the GP, nobody wears masks and there are always at least 2 or 3 people visibly coughing which makes me very anxious as any cold or flu will cause me to crash for weeks.” When patients do ask for basic safety measures to be put in place, they are often dismissed. “My mammogram mobile unit nurses refused to wear masks saying it was no longer required when I attended for a cancer screening.” This lack of infection control was echoed in a recent blog Laura Evans wrote about how she has been dismissed when asking for basic patient safety measures to be put in place when going for an appointment.[6] A lack of knowledge from healthcare professionals The uncertainty about the response of healthcare professionals to an ME or Long Covid diagnosis adds yet another layer of difficulty. Ignorance, and being belittled and dismissed, was commonly reported by patients sharing their experiences with us. “I have had virtually no support from the NHS, as I quickly grew intolerant of being told ‘you'll recover in time’ when it seemed highly unlikely and even ‘M.E. doesn't exist’ by one GP. “ “I have been greeted with comments about my weight and immobility, including one GP who even told me which streets to walk down in order to achieve a one mile exercise circuit to do daily for weight loss. With further information on how this would be increased weekly to achieve 3 miles.” There is often a lack of understanding of how other conditions interact with ME, or that many of patients with ME are highly sensitive to medications, anaesthetics and other forms of intervention (tracer dyes, MRI/CT scans). Many patients have expressed concerns that there was a lack of specialist training at every single level. Other health inequalities faced The hub community thread also raised concerns around the intersectional barriers some people with Long Covid or ME face because of their race or ethnic background or because they are neurodiverse and that there is a lack of support for them. “I'm a person of colour who has had Long Covid for nearly five years. I am dismayed at the total absence of Long Covid care or support for people of colour.” “ME has so many implications across so many interconnected factors and people of colour are known to be less well treated already in the health system including for pain and fatigue, and also to be at high risk in population terms for ME and Long Covid." Equality and diversity need to be considered to prevent inequalities widening. What needs to be done to improve services? Health services need to think outside the box about how things can be delivered differently and draw experience from other conditions that have similar access needs, for example, autism, learning disabilities, sensory sensitivities. There were lots of suggestions from patients and carers on how services could be improved. Here are the 10 that stood out: More home visits, for example for dentistry, blood tests, physio, eye tests, smear tests and consultations, scheduled at a time that works for the patient. More remote appointments. Longer appointments. The ability to submit written information in advance to minimise talking time and shorten appointments. Basic infection control measures in place, such as staff wearing high quality masks and appropriate ventilation in the building. Better designed GP surgeries and hospitals—for example, waiting areas available that are quiet and dimly lit and thought given to how people will get to the different departments they may need to attend. Joined up thinking and communication between departments treating co-morbid conditions—for example, endocrinology, neurology, rheumatology, gastroenterology, allergy clinic, etc Appropriate in-patient care for severe patients when hospital admission cannot be avoided, in a supportive caring environment, utilising evidence-based support and designed for those with heightened sensitivities. An advocacy service, where someone with extensive experience of ME can accompany and act as spokesperson to negotiate and navigate existing systems with the patient who is unable to advocate on their own behalf. All staff throughout the NHS to have sufficient training on Long Covid/ME (including receptionists, as well as primary and secondary healthcare professionals). Unfortunately, there were many negative experiences and challenges shared; however, there were some positive examples of reasonable adjustments that can make a big difference to the patient. I’ll leave you with two: “We are very lucky to have a GP who is understanding. Because we are cautious about waiting in a busy GP reception area which is full of unwell people, we wait in the car outside and she calls us when she is ready. On our request she wears a mask and opens the windows for some ventilation. She also keeps the session as short as possible and arranges an appointment later in the day.” “I had a specialist-trained ME doctor when I first developed ME, who, although she could not provide me with any of the additional services that ME patients so clearly need, was able competently to diagnose me, to reassure me in relation to differential diagnoses, to refer me to the local ME service (which visited me at home and did much to teach me about pacing and help stabilise me in the early months of illness), and who was unfailing in her patience and care for those with chronic conditions like ME, often exceeding appointment time limits and going out of her way to phone with reminders for blood tests or check ups or to follow something up, suggest non-NHS alternative practitioners or simply discuss my fears and concerns, particularly when new symptoms arose.“ We would love to hear from healthcare professionals who are making changes in their organisations. Please share your initiatives and examples of good practice with the hub. You can comment below (you will need to be a member and signed in) or email [email protected]. References #There4Me. Exploring the barriers that impact access to NHS care for people with ME and Long Covid. Patient Safety Learning, 30 January 2025. Healthwatch. NHS travel troubles: Five barriers patients face getting to appointments, 14 November 2024. Nuffield Trust. Access to GP appointments and services, 19 December 2024. Fisher E, Taylor B. NHS hospital care: Who is waiting and what are they waiting for? Nuffield Trust, 10 October 2024. Hargrave K. Policy brief. Building an NHS that’s there for Long Covid and ME, July 2024. Evans L. "Why should a vulnerable person be expected to tolerate lack of protections against Covid?" Patient Safety Learning, 2025.

Judy Walker Associates are hosting a training day in London on 2 October for individuals, rather than groups to attend. We’ve been receiving requests from people in primary care, independent providers and previous clients for individuals to access our professional development for AAR Conductors, so are happy to accommodate. Participants will get live AAR practice and feedback, learn about the Five Switches of advanced facilitation and understand how to involve patients and families successfully in AARs. Please get in touch and we can send you a flyer [email protected]

This session is aimed at individuals who want to improve safety with time critical medicines, working in any sector and role. The speakers share their experiences and innovative practices addressing safe use of time critical medicines, to inspire and equip the audience ready for translation and replication across systems. The Specialist Pharmacy Service will also present the progress of their safer use of time critical medicines programme, part of NHS England’s Medication Safety Improvement Programme. Why it’s important: There are known risks associated with time critical medicines. Harms continue to be reported across the system. Implementation of safety strategies to support the safe use of time critical medicines requires a collaborative and system wide approach to ensure safe and sustainable safety improvements. What will be covered: Understand the challenges surrounding time critical medicines. A carer’s perspective on time critical medicines. Update on the safer use of time critical medicines national programme, including work done so far and next steps. Increased awareness of potential improvement interventions for the safer use of time critical medicines. Register

Join this webinar on “Safe Birth and Neonatal Care – Strengthening Healthcare Systems for Every Newborn” on 13 June 2025, from 3:00 to 4:00 IST. This webinar aims to address system-level gaps in maternal and newborn care in India. The session will bring together healthcare professionals, policymakers, and patient advocates to discuss referral mechanisms, care standards, and strategies to improve outcomes for mothers and newborns. Focus Area: Safe care practices for newborns and children. Strengthening referral systems and delivery care. Reducing preventable maternal and neonatal deaths. System-level recommendations for safer healthcare. Join us to be part of this critical dialogue on advancing patient safety for every newborn and child. Register