Jump to content
  • Posts

    1,267
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Sam

Administrators

Everything posted by Sam

  1. Event
    The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) is the NHS’s approach to developing and maintaining effective systems and processes for responding to patient safety incidents and ensuring learning and improvement in patient safety. This national conference looks at the practicalities of implementing and using PSIRF. The day will provide an update on best practice in incident investigation under PSIRF and ensuring the focus is on a systems based approach to learning from patient safety incidents and delivering safety actions for improvement. The PSIRF is a contractual requirement under the NHS Standard Contract and as such is mandatory for services provided under that contract, including acute, ambulance, mental health, and community healthcare providers. This includes maternity and all specialised services. Book your place hub members receive a 20% discount. Email info@pslhub.org for discount code.
  2. Event
    This conference focuses on recognising and responding to the deteriorating patient and ensuring best practice in the use of NEWS2. The conference will include national developments, including the recent recommendations on NEWS2 and Covid-19, and implementing the recommendations from the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch Report Investigation into recognising and responding to critically unwell patients. The conference will include practical case study based sessions on identifying patients at risk of deterioration, improving practice in patient observations, the role of human factors in responding to the deteriorating patient, improving escalation and understanding success factors in escalation, sepsis and Covid-19, involving patients and families in recognising deterioration, using clinical judgement, and improving the communication and use of NEWS2 in the community, including care homes, and at the interface of care. The Recording of NEWS2 score, escalation time and response time for unplanned critical care admissions is now an NHS CQUIN goal. For further information and to book your place visit https://www.healthcareconferencesuk.co.uk/virtual-online-courses/deteriorating-patient-summit or email aman@hc-uk.org.uk. hub members receive a 20% discount. Email info@pslhub.org for the discount code. Follow on Twitter @HCUK_Clare #DeterioratingPatient
  3. Event
    This conference will be chaired and has been produced in association with Christopher Fincken, past Chair and member of, The UK Caldicott Guardian Council, and will include national developments and local case studies in information sharing and the role of the Caldicott Guardian in primary care. The conference aims to bring current and aspiring Caldicott Guardians together to understand current issues and the national context, and to debate and discuss key issues and areas they are facing in practice. For further information and to book your place visit https://www.healthcareconferencesuk.co.uk/virtual-online-courses/caldicott-primary-care or email aman@hc-uk.org.uk Follow on Twitter @HCUK_Clare #CaldicottPC hub members receive a 20% discount. Email info@pslhub.org for discount code.
  4. Event
    Personality disorders encompass a wide range of conditions which have long been misunderstood and stigmatised. Individuals with personality disorders often face exclusion and limited access to an appropriate care and support system. In recognising this pressing need for change, we have assembled a conference with mental health professionals, researchers and advocates that will explore innovative strategies, evidence-based treatments and compassionate support frameworks that can transform lives. For further information and to book your place visit https://www.healthcareconferencesuk.co.uk/virtual-online-courses/personality-disorder or email aman@hc-uk.org.uk Follow on Twitter @HCUK_Clare #PersonalityDisorder2024 hub members receive a 20% discount. Email info@pslhub.org for discount code.
  5. Event
    This conference focuses on quality accreditation, monitoring and assurance. The conference will support you to develop systems and processes for local accreditation for quality. Accreditation can be used as a tool to encouraging ownership of continuous quality improvement, reduce variation and increase staff pride and team working. There will be an extended focus on meeting the CQC Quality Statements in line with the new assessment framework. For further information and to book your place visit https://www.healthcareconferencesuk.co.uk/virtual-online-courses/quality-accreditation or email kate@hc-uk.org.uk Follow on Twitter @HCUK_Clare #QualityAccreditation hub members receive a 20% discount. Email info@pslhub.org for discount code.
  6. Event
    Safeguards will be delayed until at least the next general election (anticipated to be in Autumn 2024). Even if a new government is keen to implement Liberty Protection Safeguards (LPS), any reform will now be some years away. With the delay to the Liberty Protection Safeguards it is more important than ever to ensure the existing scheme for deprivation of liberty works, including the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and the role of the Court of Protection and High Court. It has been widely recognised that there are number of challenges associated with the current system, both in DoLS and in the court, and we have to deal with these challenges with the tools that we have for now. Attention needs to turn to getting deprivation of liberty in the community cases to court more effectively, as well as cases involving children and young people. It is also vital that providers understand the Mental Capacity Act and use it effectively. For further information and to book a place visit https://www.healthcareconferencesuk.co.uk/virtual-online-courses/liberty-protection-safeguards-mca or email frida@hc-uk.org.uk Follow the conference on Twitter @HCUK_Clare #LPS2024 hub members receive a 20% discount. Email info@pslhub.org for discount code.
  7. News Article
    Bereaved relatives have accused ministers of dragging their feet over an inquiry into the death of almost 2,000 patients across NHS mental health trusts in Essex. The inquiry has still not started more than eight months after the announcement that it would be relaunched with beefed-up powers. In June last year, the government gave in to pressure from families and the then chair of the inquiry, granting it legal powers to compel witnesses to give evidence. In December, the new terms of reference were sent to ministers, setting out what the inquiry will investigate. But the terms of reference have yet to be approved by ministers, leaving relatives frustrated, with another “unnecessary” death reported a few weeks ago. Melanie Leahy, whose son, Matthew, died at the Linden Centre in Chelmsford in 2012, said: “I know that this inquiry, the first of its kind nationally, if carried out in a timely and comprehensively investigative manner, it has the power to prevent more deaths, not just in Essex but all over the UK. “Why am I and all the other bereaved families and injured individuals still waiting? Worse, why are we being met with such callous and terrifying indifference? Why are our legal team being ignored? We can only conclude that our government simply does not care. If the government continues to drag its feet in this way then they must be held to account for their failings. If there are more deaths during this interminable wait, this government needs to be held responsible.” Read full story Source: The Guardian, 12 March 2024
  8. News Article
    While employment for new clinicians was positive in the last year with 96% of new nurses finding work, the issue is transitioning those clinicians from education into bedside and hospital practice, which is the most pressing safety challenge of 2024, according to the ECRI's annual report on patient safety. "[T]here is growing concern about the difficulty of transitioning new clinicians from education to practice — in the face of several factors exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic," an overview of the report states. "Without sufficient preparation, support, and training, new clinicians can experience loss of confidence, burnout, and reduced mindfulness around culture of safety. The combination of these factors may lead to preventable harm." The ECRI publishes independent medical device evaluations, annually aggregates scientific literature and patient safety events, concerns reported to or investigated by the organization, and other data sources to create its top 10 report. Each topic that landed in this year's top 10 "represents a failure in at least one of these areas; in fact, many overlap and their roots are found in multiple areas," the report notes. Read full story Source: Becker Hospital Review, 11 March 2024
  9. Event
    until
    Dr Tom Rose shares how to create effective healthcare process documentation to enable more effective improvement, risk assessment and safety reviews. The documenting of healthcare processes is a key part of such an effective continuous quality improvement system. But currently very few healthcare processes are documented – which greatly hampers effective improvement, risk assessment and safety reviews. And too often Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are relied on, but they are not process specific which makes them difficult to apply. Dr Tom Rose will share examples of NHS Standard Process documentation, from the National safety standards for invasive procedures, Getting It Right First Time, and the World Health Organisation’s High 5s project. Tom will also share how to effectively identify the individual processes relevant to a single work team or area, such as a ward, GP practice reception or patient pathway. He will show how front line staff can dictate the design of these processes (i.e. visual representations of Work-as-Done), supported by an experienced facilitator or designer who is responsible for producing the documentation. This is an iterative process that has been designed not to take up too much of front-line staff’s time. This event is organised by the Q Community’s Process Visualisation in the NHS and Quality Management in Healthcare Special Interest Groups. All are welcome to join. Register
  10. News Article
    Nearly 70 healthcare workers with Long Covid will take their fight to the High Court later to sue the NHS and other employers for compensation. The staff, from England and Wales, believe they first caught Covid at work during the pandemic and say they were not properly protected from the virus. Many of them say they are left with life-changing disabilities and are likely to lose income as a result. The Department of Health said "there are lessons to be learnt" from Covid. The group believe they were not provided with adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) at work, which includes eye protection, gloves, gowns and aprons. In particular, they say they should have had access to high-grade masks, which help block droplets in the air from patient's coughs and sneezes which can contain the Covid virus. But the masks they were given tended to be in line with national guidance. Rachel Hext, who is 36, has always insisted that she caught Covid in her job as a nurse in a small community hospital in Devon. "It's devastating. I live an existence rather than a life. It prevents me doing so much of what I want to do. And it's been four years." Her list of long Covid symptoms includes everything from brain fog and extreme fatigue to nerve damage, and deafness in one ear. Solicitor Kevin Digby, who represents more than 60 members of the group, describes their case as "very important". He says: "It's quite harrowing. These people really have been abandoned, and they are really struggling to fight to get anything. "Now, they can take it to court and hope that they can get some compensation for the injuries that they've suffered." Read full story Source: BBC News, 6 March 2024 Related reading on the hub: Healthcare workers with Long Covid: Group litigation – a blog from David Osborn The pandemic – questions around Government governance: a blog from David Osborn
  11. News Article
    Scrapping the new Therapeutic Products Act (TPA) will leave thousands of New Zealanders exposed to ongoing harm from dodgy medical devices, warn patient safety advocates and legal experts. The act, which was due to come into force in 2026, would have modernised the regulation of medicines and natural health products, and made medical devices, as well as cell, gene and tissue therapies, subject to a similar regulatory regime as drugs. The industry has backed the move, saying the new law was heavy-handed and would stop people getting access to the latest lifesaving technological advances. However, Auckland woman Carmel Berry — who was left in constant knife-like pain from plastic mesh implanted during surgery — said she was “living proof” of the old system’s failures. It took more than 10 years of lobbying by her and the other founders of Mesh Down Under to get authorities to take action — a decade in which hundreds of other people were injured. She is horrified that the TPA, signed into law in only July, is on the chopping block. Beginning work to repeal it was No 47 out of 49 points on the Government’s to-do list for its first 100 days. “I’m horrified. After so many years of developing and rewriting the act and getting it through ... shame on them.” Read full story Source: New Zealand Herald, 18 February 2024
  12. Event
    At this webinar, WHO will launch two WHO publications on Medication Safety, “Global burden of preventable medication-related harm” and “Policy brief on Medication Without Harm”, to create awareness and to support implementation of the WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge: Medication Without Harm. Register
  13. News Article
    “I’ve seen patients take swings at doctors because they’re not happy with the time it’s taken or the doctor’s diagnosis. I’ve seen fire extinguishers set off and thrown at people, computers lifted and thrown across the emergency department and people run out of cubicles and punch other patients – people they don’t know – for no reason.” Roger Webb, a security supervisor at the Queen’s Medical Centre hospital in Nottingham, is recalling some of the more unsavoury incidents he has witnessed in the course of his work. “I’ve been struck in the groin, had scratches all over my arms where people have dug their nails in. I’ve been bitten and I’ve been spat at while trying to deal with situations. The spitting is the most depressing of those, though, because it’s so contemptuous and so horrible. And legally it’s assault.” Like staff across the NHS, those at the QMC have seen a rise in abusive, threatening and intimidatory behaviour by patients and their relatives in recent years. In 2021-22, Nottingham University hospitals (NUH), the NHS trust that runs the QMC and its sister City hospital, recorded 1,237 incidents of aggression, violence and harassment. But it had many more – 1,806 – during the following year, 2022-23. Last year brought another increase. In the six months between April to September alone, NUH recorded another 1,167 incidents, leaving 2023-24 likely to be the worst ever on record. Staff have been hit, spat at, threatened, verbally abused and racially abused during this roll call of unpleasant incidents. Racially aggravated harassment has increased notably. Some of the incidents have led to perpetrators being charged and convicted. Worryingly, in a growing number of cases, the patient has been responsible for several incidents while receiving one single episode of care. Care delays are the main trigger for abuse at the QMC. But such incidents also arise when staff are treating drunks, rival gangs, people who are high on drugs and those with mental health problems. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 25 February 2024
  14. Event
    until
    This is for those in NHS Trusts in England only. This practical course offers an overview of the principles that underpin a professional safety investigation interview with either a member of staff, a patient or a family. The course aligns to the PSIRF guidance on a systems approach to interviews. The course includes: Planning and preparing for an interview. Using a structured hierarchy of questions to facilitate comprehensive, accurate information. Asking system-focused questions. Closing an interview. Learning objectives Understand and describe the working elements of a standardised and tested approach to investigative interviewing. Understand how to apply the model to plan, conduct and evaluate your investigative interviews. Conduct more ethical and professional interviews. Reach stronger defensible investigation conclusions. Increase your own and others confidence in your ability to investigate complex matters. Register
  15. Event
    until
    This is for those in NHS Trusts in England only. This practical course offers an overview of the principles that underpin a professional safety investigation interview with either a member of staff, a patient or a family. The course aligns to the PSIRF guidance on a systems approach to interviews. The course includes: Planning and preparing for an interview. Using a structured hierarchy of questions to facilitate comprehensive, accurate information. Asking system-focused questions. Closing an interview. Learning objectives Understand and describe the working elements of a standardised and tested approach to investigative interviewing. Understand how to apply the model to plan, conduct and evaluate your investigative interviews. Conduct more ethical and professional interviews. Reach stronger defensible investigation conclusions. Increase your own and others confidence in your ability to investigate complex matters. Register
  16. Event
    until
    This is for those in NHS Trusts in England only. This practical course offers an overview of the principles that underpin a professional safety investigation interview with either a member of staff, a patient or a family. The course aligns to the PSIRF guidance on a systems approach to interviews. The course includes: Planning and preparing for an interview. Using a structured hierarchy of questions to facilitate comprehensive, accurate information. Asking system-focused questions. Closing an interview. Learning objectives Understand and describe the working elements of a standardised and tested approach to investigative interviewing. Understand how to apply the model to plan, conduct and evaluate your investigative interviews. Conduct more ethical and professional interviews. Reach stronger defensible investigation conclusions. Increase your own and others confidence in your ability to investigate complex matters. Register
  17. Event
    This is for those in NHS Trusts in England only. This session will provide an opportunity to ‘have a go’ and discuss some of the challenges and practical aspects of using thematic analysis for the purpose of learning from patient safety issues. Learning objectives: Define thematic analysis and its key concepts. Understand the relevance of using thematic analysis in the context of healthcare safety learning responses. Code a sample data set and develop themes. Relate the use of thematic analysis to your own safety learning response practice. Registration
  18. Event
    This is for those in NHS Trusts in England only. This session will provide an opportunity to ‘have a go’ and discuss some of the challenges and practical aspects of using thematic analysis for the purpose of learning from patient safety issues. Learning objectives: Define thematic analysis and its key concepts. Understand the relevance of using thematic analysis in the context of healthcare safety learning responses. Code a sample data set and develop themes. Relate the use of thematic analysis to your own safety learning response practice. Register
  19. Event
    This is for those in NHS Trusts in England only. This session will provide an opportunity to ‘have a go’ and discuss some of the challenges and practical aspects of using thematic analysis for the purpose of learning from patient safety issues. Learning objectives: Define thematic analysis and its key concepts. Understand the relevance of using thematic analysis in the context of healthcare safety learning responses. Code a sample data set and develop themes. Relate the use of thematic analysis to your own safety learning response practice. Register
  20. Event
    This is for those in NHS Trusts in England only. This session will provide an opportunity to ‘have a go’ and discuss some of the challenges and practical aspects of using thematic analysis for the purpose of learning from patient safety issues. Learning objectives: Define thematic analysis and its key concepts. Understand the relevance of using thematic analysis in the context of healthcare safety learning responses. Code a sample data set and develop themes. Relate the use of thematic analysis to your own safety learning response practice. Register
  21. Event
    This is for those in NHS Trusts in England only. This practical course is aimed at those who are planning to use, or may already be using, After Action Review (AAR) as one of their learning responses to patient safety events. It will also be useful for those in Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) oversight roles. The course is includes: Defining what After Action Review is. Understanding the principles of After Action Review. Discussing the attributes needed to be an After Action Review facilitator. Exploring how to conduct an After Action Review. Reflecting on the value of After Action Review. Learning objectives: Define what After Action Review is. Understand the principles of After Action Review. Know the attributes needed to be an After Action Review facilitator. Understand how to conduct an After Action Review. Register
  22. Event
    This is for those in NHS Trusts in England only. This practical course is aimed at those who are planning to use, or may already be using, After Action Review (AAR) as one of their learning responses to patient safety events. It will also be useful for those in Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) oversight roles. The course is includes: Defining what After Action Review is. Understanding the principles of After Action Review. Discussing the attributes needed to be an After Action Review facilitator. Exploring how to conduct an After Action Review. Reflecting on the value of After Action Review. Learning objectives: Define what After Action Review is. Understand the principles of After Action Review. Know the attributes needed to be an After Action Review facilitator. Understand how to conduct an After Action Review. Register
  23. Event
    This is for those in NHS Trusts in England only. This practical course is aimed at those who are planning to use, or may already be using, After Action Review (AAR) as one of their learning responses to patient safety events. It will also be useful for those in Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) oversight roles. The course is includes: Defining what After Action Review is. Understanding the principles of After Action Review. Discussing the attributes needed to be an After Action Review facilitator. Exploring how to conduct an After Action Review. Reflecting on the value of After Action Review. Learning objectives: Define what After Action Review is. Understand the principles of After Action Review. Know the attributes needed to be an After Action Review facilitator. Understand how to conduct an After Action Review. Register
  24. Event
    This is for those in NHS Trusts in England only. This practical course is aimed at those who are planning to use, or may already be using, After Action Review (AAR) as one of their learning responses to patient safety events. It will also be useful for those in Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) oversight roles. The course is includes: Defining what After Action Review is. Understanding the principles of After Action Review. Discussing the attributes needed to be an After Action Review facilitator. Exploring how to conduct an After Action Review. Reflecting on the value of After Action Review. Learning objectives: Define what After Action Review is. Understand the principles of After Action Review. Know the attributes needed to be an After Action Review facilitator. Understand how to conduct an After Action Review. Register
  25. News Article
    An unprecedented number of women are being investigated by police on suspicion of illegally ending a pregnancy, the BBC has been told. Abortion provider MSI says it knows of up to 60 criminal inquiries in England and Wales since 2018, compared with almost zero before. Some investigations followed natural pregnancy loss, File on 4 found. Pregnancy loss is investigated only if credible evidence suggests a crime, the National Police Chiefs' Council says. File on 4 has spoken to women who say that they have been "traumatised" and left feeling "suicidal" following criminal investigations lasting years. Speaking for the first time, one woman described how she had been placed under investigation after giving birth prematurely, despite maintaining that she had never attempted an abortion. Dr Jonathan Lord, medical director at MSI, which is one of the UK's main abortion providers, believes the "unprecedented" number of women now falling under investigation may be linked to the police's increased awareness of the availability of the "pills by post" scheme - introduced in England and Wales during the Covid-19 lockdown. Scotland also introduced a similar programme. These "telemedicine" schemes, which allow pregnancies up to 10 weeks to be terminated at home, remain in effect. Campaigners are concerned that it is possible for women to knowingly or unknowingly use the pills after this point. MSI's Dr Lord says criminal investigations and prosecutions further "traumatise" women after abortions, and that women deserve "compassion" rather than "punishment". "These women are often vulnerable and in desperate situations - they need help, not investigation and punishment," he says. Read full story Source: BBC News, 20 February 2024
×
×
  • Create New...