Patient-Safety-Learning
PSL ModeratorsContent Type
Forums
Learn
News
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Patient-Safety-Learning
-
Content ArticleThis blog in The BMJ Opinion by Steph O'Donohue, content and engagement manager at Patient Safety Learning, looks at the benefits and potential risks of the midwifery continuity of carer model. Steph highlights that seeing the same midwife throughout pregnancy and during labour allows patient and midwife to build a relationship of trust and results in improved outcomes for patients and their babies. She argues that patients and families would be more vocal advocates for continuity of carer if they better understood the benefits of the model. Further reading: Midwifery Continuity of Carer: What does good look like?' Midwifery Continuity of Carer: Frontline insights The benefits of Continuity of Carer: a midwife’s personal reflection
-
Content ArticleThis new video by the Health Quality & Safety Commission New Zealand features consumers, clinicians and researchers talking about the benefits of following a restorative approach after a harmful event. It describes restorative practice and hohou te rongopai (peace-making from a te ao Māori world view) which both provide a response that recognises people are hurt and their relationships affected by harm in healthcare.
-
Content ArticlePeople in Place highlights the fundamental skills and people issues which will determine the future of health and care in the UK. The Covid-19 pandemic has made these issues clearer and more pressing, but it has also revealed an appetite for change and resulted in innovative ways of working. This report argues that building effective collective leadership into systems and places is vital to overcome staffing and governance issues in the NHS. Focusing on building long-term frameworks for change rather than responding to immediate pressures, it suggests practical tools and resources that could be used to bring about transformation within the system.
-
Content ArticleIn this systematic review published in BMJ Open, the authors analyse and compare the focus of 694 studies about safety culture in hospitals. The review identifies 11 key themes relating to safety culture across the studies. The authors suggest that the wide range of methods and tools available highlights a persistent lack of consensus in defining patient safety. They also highlight the value of qualitative and mixed method approaches in providing context and meaning to quantitative surveys that assess safety culture.
-
Content ArticleMany diagnostic mistakes are caused by reasoning errors, but lack of feedback makes it difficult for healthcare providers to make improvements in this area. This paper, published in BMJ Quality & Safety, describes the reason for and process of developing 'The Diagnosis Learning Cycle', a new model for feedback and improvement in diagnosis. The model is based on theory and knowledge from both outside and within the field of healthcare. It proposes a standardised feedback mechanism that includes concrete measures of factors such as reasoning and confidence.
-
Content ArticleThe authors of this research study, published in BMJ Quality & Safety looked at the issues of hazardous prescribing and inadequate monitoring in patients with mental health issues being managed in primary care. They identified a lack of data in this area, despite most patients with mental illness receiving treatment in a primary care setting. The study found that: 9.4% of patients ‘at risk’ triggered at least one indicator for potentially hazardous prescribing. The risk was greatest for patients aged 35–44, females and those receiving more than 10 repeat prescriptions. 90.2% of patients ‘at risk’ triggered at least one indicator for inadequate monitoring. The risk was particularly high in people under the age of 25, females and those with one or no repeat prescription. The authors of the study hope their findings will support providers to reduce risk and improve care for patients who receive mental health treatment in primary care.
-
Content Article
Mindfulness and safety
Patient-Safety-Learning posted an article in Incentives and techniques
Current research suggests that staff mindfulness practices can contribute to better safety outcomes. Researchers at the University of Houston have conducted a systematic review of studies that assess the relationship between mindfulness and safety at work. The study suggests that: mindfulness training does not need to be lengthy or frequent to have a significant impact on workplace safety different mindfulness training techniques are better suited to specific industries such as healthcare and the military. -
Content ArticleThe Children and young people with Long COVID (CLoCk) study is the largest study to date of children and young people in the world. It aims to describe how children and young people are affected by post-COVID physical symptoms and mental health problems and to identify those most at risk. The CLoCk study is led by UCL and Public Health England and involves collaboration with researchers at the universities of Edinburgh, Bristol, Oxford, Cambridge, Liverpool, Leicester, Manchester as well as King’s College London, Imperial College London, Public Health England, Great Ormond Street Hospital and University College London Hospitals (UCLH).
-
Content ArticleThis article in the Journal of Patient Safety & Quality Improvement examines the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on patient safety reporting and procedures in 33 healthcare settings in Indonesia. The authors found that: patient safety data was recorded and reported less often during 2020, partly due to fewer hospital attendances. the pandemic has had a significant positive impact on hospital staff's compliance with handwashing policies. surgical procedures were less accurate during 2020, as surgical staff sought to reduce infection risk by missing safety procedures such as the surgical checklist.
-
Content ArticleMany elective orthopaedic procedures were cancelled due to the Covid-19 pandemic and the number of patients on waiting lists for surgery is rising. This study looks at the disparities between inpatient and day-case orthopaedic waiting list numbers and the ‘hidden burden’ that exists due to reductions in elective secondary care referrals. The authors looked at elective procedures at a single District General Hospital in the UK between 1 April and 31 December 2020 and compared data with the same nine-month period from 2019. The study found: a 52.8% reduction in elective surgical workload in 2020 the total number of patients on waiting lists had risen by 30.1% in just 12 months inpatient waiting lists have risen by 73.2%, compared to a 1.6% rise in the day-case waiting list new patient referrals from primary care and therapy have reduced by 49.7%. The authors highlight the disparity between inpatient and day-case waiting lists and predict an influx of new referrals as the pandemic eases. They call for robust planning and allocation of adequate resources to deal with the backlog.
-
Content ArticleThis report by Roger Kline brings together a range of research evidence to suggest practical steps NHS employers can take to reduce inequalities in staff recruitment and career progression. It specifically focuses on the treatment of female, disabled and BAME staff. Written for practitioners, it summarises some of the research evidence on fair recruitment and career progression. It highlights principles drawn from research that underpin the suggestions made for improving each stage of recruitment and career progression.
-
Content ArticleDouble-checking the administration of medications has been standard practice in paediatric hospitals around the world for decades, but there is little evidence of its effectiveness in reducing errors or harm. This study in BMJ Quality & Safety measures the association between double-checking and the occurrence and potential severity of medication administration errors. The authors found that: most nurses complied with mandated double-checking, but the process was rarely independent when not carried out independently, double-checking resulted in little difference to the occurrence and severity of errors compared with single-checking where double-checking was not mandated, but was performed, errors were less likely to occur and were less serious. They raise a question about whether the current approach to double-checking is a good use of time and resources, given the limited impact it has on medication administration errors.
-
Content ArticleIn this editorial for BMJ Quality & Safety, Dr Tamasine Grimes makes the case for greater patient involvement in managing medication, particularly at points of transition in care. She comments on a recent report on the effects of MARQUIS2, an evidence-based toolkit trialled in North American hospitals to help manage complex medication. The report found that interventions that involved patients in managing their medication had a significant effect in decreasing medication discrepancies, while purely system-level interventions did not.
-
Content ArticleDiagnostic errors have a negative impact on patient treatment and cost healthcare systems a large amount in wasted resources. This paper published by the Deeble Institute for Health Policy Research looks at diagnostic errors related to medical imaging in Australian public healthcare. It also looks at health policies that have been used internationally to improve the use of diagnostic imaging and reduce the consequences of diagnostic errors. The authors recommend: implementing a national strategy in Australia to identify and prevent diagnostic errors analysing medical indemnity claims to help measure the incidence and consequences of diagnostic errors.
-
Content Article
Alzheimer's Society: 'This is me' leaflet
Patient-Safety-Learning posted an article in Dementia
'This is me' is a simple leaflet for anyone receiving professional care who is living with dementia or experiencing delirium or other communication difficulties. 'This is me' can be used to record details about a person who can't easily share information about themselves. For example, it can be used to record: a person’s cultural and family background important events, people and places from their life their preferences and routines. -
Content ArticleGetting It Right First Time (GIRFT) is designed to improve the quality of care within the NHS by reducing unwarranted variations. By tackling variations in the way services are delivered across the NHS, and by sharing best practice between trusts, GIRFT identifies changes that will help improve care and patient outcomes, as well as delivering efficiencies such as the reduction of unnecessary procedures and cost savings.
-
Content ArticleGetting It Right First Time (GIRFT) is designed to improve the quality of care within the NHS by reducing unwarranted variations. By tackling variations in the way services are delivered across the NHS, and by sharing best practice between trusts, GIRFT identifies changes that will help improve care and patient outcomes, as well as delivering efficiencies such as the reduction of unnecessary procedures and cost savings.
-
Content ArticleGetting It Right First Time (GIRFT) is designed to improve the quality of care within the NHS by reducing unwarranted variations. By tackling variations in the way services are delivered across the NHS, and by sharing best practice between trusts, GIRFT identifies changes that will help improve care and patient outcomes, as well as delivering efficiencies such as the reduction of unnecessary procedures and cost savings.
-
Content ArticleGetting It Right First Time (GIRFT) is designed to improve the quality of care within the NHS by reducing unwarranted variations. By tackling variations in the way services are delivered across the NHS, and by sharing best practice between trusts, GIRFT identifies changes that will help improve care and patient outcomes, as well as delivering efficiencies such as the reduction of unnecessary procedures and cost savings.
-
Content ArticleGetting It Right First Time (GIRFT) is designed to improve the quality of care within the NHS by reducing unwarranted variations. By tackling variations in the way services are delivered across the NHS, and by sharing best practice between trusts, GIRFT identifies changes that will help improve care and patient outcomes, as well as delivering efficiencies such as the reduction of unnecessary procedures and cost savings.
-
Content ArticleGetting It Right First Time (GIRFT) is designed to improve the quality of care within the NHS by reducing unwarranted variations. By tackling variations in the way services are delivered across the NHS, and by sharing best practice between trusts, GIRFT identifies changes that will help improve care and patient outcomes, as well as delivering efficiencies such as the reduction of unnecessary procedures and cost savings.
-
Content ArticleGetting It Right First Time (GIRFT) is designed to improve the quality of care within the NHS by reducing unwarranted variations. By tackling variations in the way services are delivered across the NHS, and by sharing best practice between trusts, GIRFT identifies changes that will help improve care and patient outcomes, as well as delivering efficiencies such as the reduction of unnecessary procedures and cost savings.
-
Content ArticleGetting It Right First Time (GIRFT) is designed to improve the quality of care within the NHS by reducing unwarranted variations. By tackling variations in the way services are delivered across the NHS, and by sharing best practice between trusts, GIRFT identifies changes that will help improve care and patient outcomes, as well as delivering efficiencies such as the reduction of unnecessary procedures and cost savings.
-
Content ArticleGetting It Right First Time (GIRFT) is designed to improve the quality of care within the NHS by reducing unwarranted variations. By tackling variations in the way services are delivered across the NHS, and by sharing best practice between trusts, GIRFT identifies changes that will help improve care and patient outcomes, as well as delivering efficiencies such as the reduction of unnecessary procedures and cost savings.
-
Content ArticleGetting It Right First Time (GIRFT) is designed to improve the quality of care within the NHS by reducing unwarranted variations. By tackling variations in the way services are delivered across the NHS, and by sharing best practice between trusts, GIRFT identifies changes that will help improve care and patient outcomes, as well as delivering efficiencies such as the reduction of unnecessary procedures and cost savings.
