Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Quality improvement'.
-
Content ArticleHospital boards generally focus attention on measures to answer questions about risk, such as 'How safe are we now?' They are ultimately accountable for the quality of care delivered in hospitals, and data review is a key component of effective board governance. This editorial in BMJ Quality & Safety highlights the lack of guidance on the most effective format for presenting data to determine progress against key risks and targets. The authors argue that data must not be overly simplified and that charts prepared for boards should include monthly data points in graphic format over a longer period of time. This allows trends to be more visible and denotes whether an observed change is significant, helping hospital boards avoid erroneous conclusions tied to random variation.
- Posted
-
- Leadership
- Board member
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content ArticleIn this video, Yvonne Silove from the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP), presents on HQIP datasets and offers top tips for data access. Yvonne's presentation was originally given at the Using Health and Social Care Datasets in Research event 'Lifting the lid on data—meet the data custodians'.
- Posted
-
- Data
- Accessibility
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content ArticleRoyal Cornwall QI conference online book supporting the conference. The online brochure highlights all the quality improvement projects at Royal Cornwall Hospitals.
- Posted
-
- Quality improvement
- Organisational culture
- (and 7 more)
-
Content ArticleThis report by the Beryl Institute and Ipsos explores the core trends impacting healthcare and patient experience overall in the United States. It highlights key issues expressed by consumers in an online survey relating to quality of care and experience of care, taking into account the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and how it has altered the delivery of healthcare.
-
Content ArticleIn this interview for the Betsy Lehman Center in Massachusetts, Lee Kim Erickson, Senior Vice President and Chief Quality Officer at Wellforce, talks about maintaining a focus on patient safety during times of crisis, the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on training for healthcare workers and the importance of maintaining a focus on care from the patient's point of view.
- Posted
-
- USA
- Quality improvement
- (and 5 more)
-
Content ArticleIn this podcast, the Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) team talks to the National Director for Patient Safety about the new LFPSE service, why it’s important, and the benefits he thinks it will bring for patient safety.
- Posted
-
- LFPSE
- Patient safety strategy
- (and 4 more)
-
Content ArticlePeripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are medical devices often used for medium-to-long-term intravenous therapy, but they are often associated with morbid and potentially lethal complications. This multi-centre study in the journal Plos One aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based appropriateness criteria to improve PICC safety and patient outcomes in a pay-for-performance model. The authors found that structured quality improvement (QI) efforts led to sustained PICC appropriateness and improved patient safety. These interventions included a multidisciplinary vascular access committee, clear targets, local champions and support from an online education toolkit.
- Posted
-
- Quality improvement
- Research
- (and 4 more)
-
Content ArticleThe Patient safety incident response framework (PSIRF) represents a new approach to responding to incidents. Under PSIRF, those leading the patient safety agenda within provider organisations, together with internal and external stakeholders (including patient safety partners, commissioners, NHS England, regulators, Local Healthwatch, coroners etc), decide how to respond to patient safety incidents based on the need to generate insight to inform safety improvement where it matters most. Key issues must first be identified and described as part of planning activities before an organisation agrees how it intends to respond to maximise learning and improvement. This guidance has been developed collaboratively between Stop the Pressure Programme, National Wound Care Strategy leads and members of the Patient Safety Team, with the support from the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) Implementation and Working Groups.
- Posted
-
- PSIRF
- Patient safety incident
- (and 4 more)
-
Content ArticleWest Suffolk is first of a small number of trusts in England that are part of a pilot programme recently launched by NHS Improvement and NHS England called the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF). A national initiative, it is designed to further improve the quality and safety of the care we provide through learning from patient safety incidents. PSIRF outlines how providers should respond to patient safety incidents, and how and when an investigation should be carried out. It includes the requirement for the publication of a local Patient Safety Incident Response Plan (PSIRP), which sets out how trusts will continually improve the quality and safety of the care they provide, as well as the experience which patients, families and carers have when using our services. Find out more about what West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust are doing.
- Posted
-
- PSIRF
- Investigation
- (and 4 more)
-
Content ArticleVideo recording and slides of a webinar presented by Mary Dixon-Woods, Professor of Medical Sociology and Wellcome Trust Investigator.
- Posted
-
- Quality improvement
- Patient harmed
- (and 2 more)
-
Content ArticleMost healthcare systems across the globe are dealing with the reality of limited resources and staffing shortages. Therefore, it is more important than ever to ensure that health care professionals spend time on doing what matters most and providing the most value for service users. Meaningful time spent face to face is a high priority for both service users and health care professionals. Paying more attention to computers than people because of the demands of burdensome documentation diverts our attention from direct care. It is a situation that is unsatisfactory for all parties. The Danish municipality of Sønderborg, a safety leader in nursing home and home-based care for more than a decade, decided to see what could be done. With improvement science already embedded in their organisation, they decided to take a deep dive into their processes as a first step. Mistakes in documentation, coordination, and communication have been identified as among the top 10 of root causes of patient safety incidents in Denmark, so it made sense to start there. Patient safety is often cited as the reason for documentation, but some research indicates that burdensome documentation is associated with increased medical errors, mistakes in documentation, and burnout among health care providers. Working from the theory that safely simplifying or streamlining documentation would free up time for direct care, Sønderborg and the Danish Society for Patient Safety embarked on an improvement journey that started with understanding the workflow of documentation that enabled staff to seek and share information from one another to plan and perform different tasks.
- Posted
-
- Human factors
- Process redesign
- (and 3 more)
-
Content ArticleThe National Vascular Registry, which measures the quality and outcomes of care for adult patients who undergo major vascular procedures in the NHS, has published its latest annual report. This report provides comparative information on five major emergency and elective vascular interventions between 2019 and 2021: Repair of aortic aneurysms, including elective infra-renal, ruptured infra-renal, and more complex aneurysms Lower limb bypass Lower limb angioplasty/stenting Major lower limb amputation Carotid endarterectomy The report also includes the results from an organisational audit of NHS vascular services in 2022.
- Posted
-
- Surgery - Vascular
- Quality improvement
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content ArticleEstablished in 2006, the National Neonatal Audit Programme (NNAP) is commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) and delivered by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH). It assesses whether babies admitted to neonatal units receive consistent high-quality care in relation to the NNAP audit measures that are aligned to a set of professionally agreed guidelines and standards. The NNAP also identifies variation in the provision of neonatal care at local unit, regional network and national levels and supports stakeholders to use audit data to stimulate improvement in care delivery and outcomes. This report summarises the key messages and national recommendations developed by the NNAP Project Board and Methodology and Dataset Group, based on NNAP data relating to babies discharged from neonatal care in England and Wales between January and December 2021.
-
Content Article
NHSE - Always Events®
Patient-Safety-Learning posted an article in NHS England
Always Events are defined as “those aspects of the patient and family experience that should always occur when patients interact with healthcare professionals and the health care delivery system”. NHS England has been leading an initiative for developing, implementing, and spreading an approach to reliably integrate Always Events into routine frontline services. Always Events® is a co-production quality improvement methodology which seeks to understand what really matters to patients, people who use services, their families and carers and then co-design changes to improve experience of care. Genuine partnerships between patients, service users, care providers, and clinicians are the foundation for co-designing and implementing reliable solutions that transform care experiences with the goal being an “Always Experience.” This webpage contains: information on the Always Events national programme Always Events toolkit Evaluation of Always Events Always Events film- Posted
-
- Quality improvement
- Methodology
- (and 4 more)
-
Content ArticleCornerstone is a free publication for anyone passionate about evidence-based healthcare, including Quality Improvement (QI), audit and clinical effectiveness professionals, and those who plan, deliver and receive healthcare. It is produced by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP), which was established in 2008 to increase the impact of clinical audit on healthcare quality improvement and support improved outcomes for patients.
- Posted
-
- Quality improvement
- Data
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content ArticleThe NHS Friends and Family Test (FFT) is designed to be a quick and simple mechanism for patients and other people who use NHS services to give feedback. This feedback can then be used to identify what is working well and to improve the quality of any aspect of patient experience. This guidance sets out the requirements of the FFT and is intended to support all provider organisations that are required to deliver the FFT.
- Posted
-
- Questionnaire
- Feedback
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content ArticleThis is the first edition of the Patient safety assessment manual for primary care, which explains how to apply the Patient Safety Friendly Primary Care Framework. It comprises a set of standards that cover the different domains of patient safety. The Patient Safety Friendly Framework was developed by the WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean to assess patient safety at a system level. The framework provides a means to determine the level of patient safety for the purpose of initiating a patient safety or quality improvement programme. The evaluation is voluntary and is conducted through self-assessment and an external peer review survey. The standards in the Patient Safety Friendly Primary Care Framework are based on international research and evidenced-based practices in primary care. To ensure the standards remain current, revisions will be made every three to four years. In this edition, the total number of standards is 19, made up of 125 criteria. Standards have been developed with consideration for their alignment with all WHO initiatives to promote safer care.
- Posted
-
- Standards
- Assessment
- (and 3 more)
-
Content ArticleThis editorial in BMJ Quality & Safety examines literature that looks at the negative side effects of quality improvement (QI) approaches and initiatives, arguing that QI can contribute to staff burnout, stress and reduced engagement. The authors make a number of recommendations for avoiding the negative side effects of QI.
- Posted
-
- Quality improvement
- Staff support
- (and 5 more)
-
EventThis conference will focus on measuring, understanding and acting on patient experience insight, and demonstrating responsiveness to that insight to ensure patient feedback is translated into quality improvement and assurance. Through national updates and case study presentations the conference will support you to measure, monitor and improve patient experience in your service, and ensure that insight leads to quality improvement. For further information and to book your place visit https://www.healthcareconferencesuk.co.uk/conferences-masterclasses/patient-experience-insight or email nicki@hc-uk.org.uk hub members receive 20% discount. Email info@pslhub.org for discount code. Follow on Twitter @HCUK_Clare #PatientExp
- Posted
-
- Patient engagement
- Feedback
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content ArticleHow can NHS provider organisations and systems reliably and sustainably improve care? Historically, most improvement interventions have been discrete, small-scale efforts run by individual teams, often without reference to what else is taking place in their trust. However, it is now widely accepted that a patchwork of local interventions is unlikely to deliver sustained improvement or efficiencies on the scale that policymakers and local leaders want. This report by the Health Foundation outlines learning from the evaluation of the NHS partnership with Virginia Mason Institute, which examined how five NHS trusts in England attempted to build a culture of continuous improvement.
- Posted
-
- Quality improvement
- Organisational culture
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
IHI: Quality Improvement essentials toolkit
Patient-Safety-Learning posted an article in Quality Improvement
This toolkit from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) includes the tools and templates you need to launch a successful Quality Improvement (QI) project and manage performance improvement. The QI tools include: Cause and effect diagram: Also known as the Ishikawa or fishbone diagram, this tool helps you analyse the root causes contributing to an outcome. Failure modes and effects analysis: Also used in Lean management and Six Sigma, FMEA is a systematic, proactive method for identifying potential risks and their impact. Run charts: These charts help you monitor performance over time. PDSA worksheet: Plan-Do-Study-Act rapid-cycle testing helps teams assess whether a change leads to improvement using a methodical learning process. You will need to create an IHI account in order to download the toolkit. You can then download the complete toolkit with all ten tools, or download individual tools as you need them to guide your continuous improvement work.- Posted
-
- Quality improvement
- Safety process
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content ArticleThis study in BMJ Open Quality examines aspects of workplace culture, employee motivation and leadership behaviours that support continuous learning and improvement, in an effort to measure the transition to high reliability. It reports on the development of two scales (trust in team members and trust in leadership) in a US children’s hospital which was seeking to assess progressive movement towards a ‘culture of safety'. The scales were designed to measure two cultural conditions fostered by the five high reliability principles and a composite measure on local learning activities.
- Posted
-
- High reliability organisations
- Quality improvement
- (and 4 more)
-
Content ArticleThe REACH Toolkit provides information, resources and quality improvement (QI) tools for managers and clinicians to improve patient, carer and family recognition and escalation of clinical deterioration in NSW health services. The resources can be adapted to suit local needs including initial program implementation, to review and improve current practices or to support current practice.
- Posted
-
- Patient / family involvement
- Patient engagement
- (and 5 more)
-
Content ArticleThis guideline describes good patient experience for babies, children and young people, and makes recommendations on how it can be delivered. It aims to make sure that all babies, children and young people using NHS services have the best possible experience of care. It includes recommendations on: overarching principles of care communication and information planning healthcare consent, privacy and confidentiality advocacy and support improving healthcare experience, including healthcare environments accessibility, continuity and coordination
- Posted
-
- Children and Young People
- Baby
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with: