Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Quality improvement'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning campaigns
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • Patient Safety Standards
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
    • Data and insight
    • Research
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


First name


Last name


Country


Join a private group (if appropriate)


About me


Organisation


Role

Found 760 results
  1. Content Article
    Hospital boards generally focus attention on measures to answer questions about risk, such as 'How safe are we now?' They are ultimately accountable for the quality of care delivered in hospitals, and data review is a key component of effective board governance. This editorial in BMJ Quality & Safety highlights the lack of guidance on the most effective format for presenting data to determine progress against key risks and targets. The authors argue that data must not be overly simplified and that charts prepared for boards should include monthly data points in graphic format over a longer period of time. This allows trends to be more visible and denotes whether an observed change is significant, helping hospital boards avoid erroneous conclusions tied to random variation.
  2. Content Article
    In this video, Yvonne Silove from the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP), presents on HQIP datasets and offers top tips for data access. Yvonne's presentation was originally given at the Using Health and Social Care Datasets in Research event 'Lifting the lid on data—meet the data custodians'.
  3. Content Article
    Royal Cornwall QI conference online book supporting the conference. The online brochure highlights all the quality improvement projects at Royal Cornwall Hospitals.
  4. Content Article
    This report by the Beryl Institute and Ipsos explores the core trends impacting healthcare and patient experience overall in the United States. It highlights key issues expressed by consumers in an online survey relating to quality of care and experience of care, taking into account the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and how it has altered the delivery of healthcare.
  5. Content Article
    In this interview for the Betsy Lehman Center in Massachusetts, Lee Kim Erickson, Senior Vice President and Chief Quality Officer at Wellforce, talks about maintaining a focus on patient safety during times of crisis, the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on training for healthcare workers and the importance of maintaining a focus on care from the patient's point of view.
  6. Content Article
    In this podcast, the Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) team talks to the National Director for Patient Safety about the new LFPSE service, why it’s important, and the benefits he thinks it will bring for patient safety.
  7. Content Article
    Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are medical devices often used for medium-to-long-term intravenous therapy, but they are often associated with morbid and potentially lethal complications. This multi-centre study in the journal Plos One aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based appropriateness criteria to improve PICC safety and patient outcomes in a pay-for-performance model. The authors found that structured quality improvement (QI) efforts led to sustained PICC appropriateness and improved patient safety. These interventions included a multidisciplinary vascular access committee, clear targets, local champions and support from an online education toolkit.
  8. Content Article
    The Patient safety incident response framework (PSIRF) represents a new approach to responding to incidents. Under PSIRF, those leading the patient safety agenda within provider organisations, together with internal and external stakeholders (including patient safety partners, commissioners, NHS England, regulators, Local Healthwatch, coroners etc), decide how to respond to patient safety incidents based on the need to generate insight to inform safety improvement where it matters most. Key issues must first be identified and described as part of planning activities before an organisation agrees how it intends to respond to maximise learning and improvement. This guidance has been developed collaboratively between Stop the Pressure Programme, National Wound Care Strategy leads and members of the Patient Safety Team, with the support from the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) Implementation and Working Groups. 
  9. Content Article
    West Suffolk is first of a small number of trusts in England that are part of a pilot programme recently launched by NHS Improvement and NHS England called the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF). A national initiative, it is designed to further improve the quality and safety of the care we provide through learning from patient safety incidents. PSIRF outlines how providers should respond to patient safety incidents, and how and when an investigation should be carried out. It includes the requirement for the publication of a local Patient Safety Incident Response Plan (PSIRP), which sets out how trusts will continually improve the quality and safety of the care they provide, as well as the experience which patients, families and carers have when using our services. Find out more about what West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust are doing.
  10. Content Article
    Mary Dixon Woods discusses the problem of context in quality improvement in this Health Foundation paper.
  11. Content Article
    Video recording and slides of a webinar presented by Mary Dixon-Woods, Professor of Medical Sociology and Wellcome Trust Investigator.
  12. Content Article
    Most healthcare systems across the globe are dealing with the reality of limited resources and staffing shortages. Therefore, it is more important than ever to ensure that health care professionals spend time on doing what matters most and providing the most value for service users. Meaningful time spent face to face is a high priority for both service users and health care professionals. Paying more attention to computers than people because of the demands of burdensome documentation diverts our attention from direct care. It is a situation that is unsatisfactory for all parties. The Danish municipality of Sønderborg, a safety leader in nursing home and home-based care for more than a decade, decided to see what could be done. With improvement science already embedded in their organisation, they decided to take a deep dive into their processes as a first step. Mistakes in documentation, coordination, and communication have been identified as among the top 10 of root causes of patient safety incidents in Denmark, so it made sense to start there. Patient safety is often cited as the reason for documentation, but some research indicates that burdensome documentation is associated with increased medical errors, mistakes in documentation, and burnout among health care providers. Working from the theory that safely simplifying or streamlining documentation would free up time for direct care, Sønderborg and the Danish Society for Patient Safety embarked on an improvement journey that started with understanding the workflow of documentation that enabled staff to seek and share information from one another to plan and perform different tasks.
  13. Content Article
    The National Vascular Registry, which measures the quality and outcomes of care for adult patients who undergo major vascular procedures in the NHS, has published its latest annual report. This report provides comparative information on five major emergency and elective vascular interventions between 2019 and 2021: Repair of aortic aneurysms, including elective infra-renal, ruptured infra-renal, and more complex aneurysms Lower limb bypass Lower limb angioplasty/stenting Major lower limb amputation Carotid endarterectomy The report also includes the results from an organisational audit of NHS vascular services in 2022.
  14. Content Article
    Established in 2006, the National Neonatal Audit Programme (NNAP) is commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) and delivered by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH). It assesses whether babies admitted to neonatal units receive consistent high-quality care in relation to the NNAP audit measures that are aligned to a set of professionally agreed guidelines and standards. The NNAP also identifies variation in the provision of neonatal care at local unit, regional network and national levels and supports stakeholders to use audit data to stimulate improvement in care delivery and outcomes. This report summarises the key messages and national recommendations developed by the NNAP Project Board and Methodology and Dataset Group, based on NNAP data relating to babies discharged from neonatal care in England and Wales between January and December 2021.
  15. Content Article
    Always Events are defined as “those aspects of the patient and family experience that should always occur when patients interact with healthcare professionals and the health care delivery system”. NHS England has been leading an initiative for developing, implementing, and spreading an approach to reliably integrate Always Events into routine frontline services. Always Events® is a co-production quality improvement methodology which seeks to understand what really matters to patients, people who use services, their families and carers and then co-design changes to improve experience of care. Genuine partnerships between patients, service users, care providers, and clinicians are the foundation for co-designing and implementing reliable solutions that transform care experiences with the goal being an “Always Experience.” This webpage contains: information on the Always Events national programme Always Events toolkit Evaluation of Always Events Always Events film
  16. Content Article
    Cornerstone is a free publication for anyone passionate about evidence-based healthcare, including Quality Improvement (QI), audit and clinical effectiveness professionals, and those who plan, deliver and receive healthcare. It is produced by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP), which was established in 2008 to increase the impact of clinical audit on healthcare quality improvement and support improved outcomes for patients.
  17. Content Article
    The NHS Friends and Family Test (FFT) is designed to be a quick and simple mechanism for patients and other people who use NHS services to give feedback. This feedback can then be used to identify what is working well and to improve the quality of any aspect of patient experience. This guidance sets out the requirements of the FFT and is intended to support all provider organisations that are required to deliver the FFT.
  18. Content Article
    This is the first edition of the Patient safety assessment manual for primary care, which explains how to apply the Patient Safety Friendly Primary Care Framework. It comprises a set of standards that cover the different domains of patient safety. The Patient Safety Friendly Framework was developed by the WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean to assess patient safety at a system level. The framework provides a means to determine the level of patient safety for the purpose of initiating a patient safety or quality improvement programme. The evaluation is voluntary and is conducted through self-assessment and an external peer review survey. The standards in the Patient Safety Friendly Primary Care Framework are based on international research and evidenced-based practices in primary care. To ensure the standards remain current, revisions will be made every three to four years. In this edition, the total number of standards is 19, made up of 125 criteria. Standards have been developed with consideration for their alignment with all WHO initiatives to promote safer care.
  19. Content Article
    This editorial in BMJ Quality & Safety examines literature that looks at the negative side effects of quality improvement (QI) approaches and initiatives, arguing that QI can contribute to staff burnout, stress and reduced engagement. The authors make a number of recommendations for avoiding the negative side effects of QI.
  20. Event
    This conference will focus on measuring, understanding and acting on patient experience insight, and demonstrating responsiveness to that insight to ensure patient feedback is translated into quality improvement and assurance. Through national updates and case study presentations the conference will support you to measure, monitor and improve patient experience in your service, and ensure that insight leads to quality improvement. For further information and to book your place visit https://www.healthcareconferencesuk.co.uk/conferences-masterclasses/patient-experience-insight or email nicki@hc-uk.org.uk hub members receive 20% discount. Email info@pslhub.org for discount code. Follow on Twitter @HCUK_Clare #PatientExp
  21. Content Article
    How can NHS provider organisations and systems reliably and sustainably improve care? Historically, most improvement interventions have been discrete, small-scale efforts run by individual teams, often without reference to what else is taking place in their trust. However, it is now widely accepted that a patchwork of local interventions is unlikely to deliver sustained improvement or efficiencies on the scale that policymakers and local leaders want. This report by the Health Foundation outlines learning from the evaluation of the NHS partnership with Virginia Mason Institute, which examined how five NHS trusts in England attempted to build a culture of continuous improvement.
  22. Content Article
    This toolkit from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) includes the tools and templates you need to launch a successful Quality Improvement (QI) project and manage performance improvement. The QI tools include: Cause and effect diagram: Also known as the Ishikawa or fishbone diagram, this tool helps you analyse the root causes contributing to an outcome. Failure modes and effects analysis: Also used in Lean management and Six Sigma, FMEA is a systematic, proactive method for identifying potential risks and their impact. Run charts: These charts help you monitor performance over time. PDSA worksheet: Plan-Do-Study-Act rapid-cycle testing helps teams assess whether a change leads to improvement using a methodical learning process. You will need to create an IHI account in order to download the toolkit. You can then download the complete toolkit with all ten tools, or download individual tools as you need them to guide your continuous improvement work.
  23. Content Article
    This study in BMJ Open Quality examines aspects of workplace culture, employee motivation and leadership behaviours that support continuous learning and improvement, in an effort to measure the transition to high reliability. It reports on the development of two scales (trust in team members and trust in leadership) in a US children’s hospital which was seeking to assess progressive movement towards a ‘culture of safety'. The scales were designed to measure two cultural conditions fostered by the five high reliability principles and a composite measure on local learning activities.
  24. Content Article
    The REACH Toolkit provides information, resources and quality improvement (QI) tools for managers and clinicians to improve patient, carer and family recognition and escalation of clinical deterioration in NSW health services. The resources can be adapted to suit local needs including initial program implementation, to review and improve current practices or to support current practice.
  25. Content Article
    This guideline describes good patient experience for babies, children and young people, and makes recommendations on how it can be delivered. It aims to make sure that all babies, children and young people using NHS services have the best possible experience of care. It includes recommendations on: overarching principles of care communication and information planning healthcare consent, privacy and confidentiality advocacy and support improving healthcare experience, including healthcare environments accessibility, continuity and coordination
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.