-
Posts
4,730 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Patient-Safety-Learning
PSL ModeratorsContent Type
Communities
Learn
News
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Patient-Safety-Learning
-
News Article
More than one in 10 women are taking weight-loss jabs, survey finds
Patient-Safety-Learning posted a news article in News
More than one in 10 women are taking weight-loss jabs, research has suggested. Some 11 per cent of women aged 30 to 75 said they were taking a weight-loss jab, a survey by Juniper, a digital weight-loss service, found. Extrapolating the results across the UK would mean that about two million of the almost 20 million women within the age group are using the drugs. The injections, which include semaglutide, known by brand names Ozempic and Wegovy, have been made popular by famous faces including Elon Musk and Boris Johnson. But concerns have been raised about people—and young women in particular—not eligible for them under NHS rules obtaining them privately. Lottie Moss, the 26-year-old half-sister of Kate Moss, was taken to hospital after the jabs made her violently ill when she used them despite being a healthy weight. And health authorities have been forced to issue safety warnings about fake pens being distributed. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has urged people to be aware of fake pharmacy websites and social media posts offering the medicines without a prescription. The regulator said criminals would go to great lengths to make their businesses appear authentic and the products that they sell could contain “toxins and other ingredients that could cause real harm”. Read full story (paywalled) Source: The Telegraph, 15 January 2025 -
News Article
Families failed by Covid jabs tell inquiry of pain
Patient-Safety-Learning posted a news article in News
Families of those harmed by Covid vaccines told the UK Covid Inquiry they were forced to support each other during the pandemic because there was no other help. Kate Scott, who represents the group Vaccine Injured and Bereaved UK (VIBUK), said they felt they were "almost being pushed into the shadows during the pandemic." The inquiry also heard from a victims' group in Scotland which raised concerns that the vaccine had been rolled out too quickly, and that safety had been sacrificed for speed. This is the Inquiry's fourth module, which will consider issues relating to the development of Covid-19 vaccines and their implementation. Mrs Scott, whose husband Jamie was left severely disabled by a vaccine, said, "We are an uncomfortable truth, but we are a truth and the truth is for everyone in our group—the vaccine caused serious harm and death." Jamie Scott, a father of two boys, worked in a high-powered job until he was severely injured by a Covid vaccine. He spent four weeks and five days in a coma and suffered an extremely rare, life-threatening side effect called VITT, or vaccine-induced immune thrombosis and thrombocytopenia. Jamie survived, but suffered a significant brain injury, which affected his thinking processes. He is now partially blind and his wife says he will never live independently. Jamie has received £120,000 - the maximum payout from the government's Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme. His wife, who is clear that neither of them is against vaccines, says he will never work again and that this is not a fair or adequate amount. Read full story Watch an interview on the hub with Charlet Crichton, founder of UKCVFamily, a support group for patients in the UK who have had an adverse reaction to a Covid-19 vaccination. Source: BBC News, 15 January 2025- Posted
-
- Vaccination
- Patient death
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
Hospital patients dying undiscovered in corridors, report on NHS reveals
Patient-Safety-Learning posted a news article in News
Patients are dying in hospital corridors and going undiscovered for hours, while others who suffer heart attacks cannot be given CPR because of overcrowding in walkways, a bombshell report from the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) on the state of the NHS has revealed. So many patients are being cared for in hospital corridors across the UK that in some cases pregnant women are having miscarriages outside wards while other patients are unable to call for help because they have no call bell and are subjected to “animal-like conditions”, said the RCN. The RCN warned that patients were “routinely coming to harm” and in some cases dying because vital equipment was not available and staff were too busy to give everyone adequate care. Dr Adrian Boyle, the leader of Britain’s A&E doctors, said the nurses’ testimonies on which the report was based were so horrendous that it “must be a watershed moment, a line in the sand” and must prompt the government to redouble its efforts to get the NHS working properly again. Boyle, the president of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, said: “I am shocked, appalled and so saddened that this is the level of care we as clinicians are being forced to provide to our patients – people who turn to the NHS and its staff when they are most vulnerable and in need.” The RCN’s 460-page report, based on “harrowing” descriptions given by 5,400 UK nurses of their experience of working in hospitals, sets out how: Patients have died on trolleys and chairs in corridors and waiting rooms in settings where “all the fundamentals of care have broken down.” One nurse had seen “cardiac arrests in the corridor with no crash bell, crash trolley, oxygen, defibrillator … straddling a patient doing CPR while everyone watches on.” Patients are being given drugs, intravenous infusions and, in one case, a blood transfusion in corridors which are cold, noisy and too cramped to allow them to have loved ones present. One nurse had to tell a patient he was dying as other patients were wheeled past and orders were shouted across the unit. They said, “How is it fair to tell someone they are dying in a corridor?” Lack of space means patients also being treated in storerooms, car parks, offices and even toilets. The report came as Wes Streeting, the health and social care secretary, was forced to defend the government’s record on the NHS in an urgent Commons debate about the intense pressures this winter that have left many hospitals overwhelmed in recent weeks. Streeting responded to Conservative attacks by telling MPs that corridor care “became normalised in NHS hospitals under the previous government. It is unsafe, undignified, a cruel consequence of 14 years of failure on the NHS and I am determined to consign it to the history books.” But, he added, while ending corridor care was the government’s ambition, “I cannot and will not promise that there will not be patients treated in corridors next year. It will take time to undo the damage that has been done to our NHS.” Read the RCN report: On the frontline of the UK’s corridor care crisis Read full story Source: The Guardian, 16 January 2025- Posted
-
- Emergency medicine
- Patient
- (and 2 more)
-
News Article
500 CQC reports ‘stuck in IT system’
Patient-Safety-Learning posted a news article in News
Around 500 draft inspection reports are “stuck” in the Care Quality Commission’s IT system and cannot currently be retrieved, its leaders admitted today. Outgoing chair Ian Dilks told the Commons health and social care committee hearing: “We have reports that go back for some months that are stuck in the system. People can’t get them back out… [The inspectors] have started their work, they have started their draft report… There is probably more information required, it has to go for quality assurance, [but] they can’t get it back out of the system. I can’t actually tell you exactly how that happened, I’m just giving you an illustration of the difficulties.” CQC chief executive Sir Julian Hartley—who took up the post last month—told the MPs around 500 reports were involved. HSJ asked the CQC for more details of which providers’ reports have been lost. It indicated the “majority” were of adult social care providers, but has not yet given further details. The regulator said the delays caused “falls far short of what people using services and providers should be able to expect and we have apologised for this”, but that “any immediate action [we] needed to take to protect people… has not been affected”. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 15 January 2025- Posted
-
- Regulatory issue
- Investigation
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Event
untilThe Maternity and Newborn Safety Investigations (MNSI) programme is part of a national strategy to improve maternity safety across the NHS in England. MNSI has completed over 3500 independent safety investigations, using a standardised, system focused methodology, into maternity events, including 237 maternal deaths. Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains one of the leading causes of direct maternal deaths in the UK, resulting in 1.5 deaths per 100,000 maternities from 2019-2020. This webinar will explore the findings from MNSI's investigation into maternal deaths following pulmonary embolism. Speakers: Dr Charlotte Frise Dr Louise Page Stephanie Smith Register for the webinar- Posted
-
- Maternity
- Patient death
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Event
untilThe Maternity and Newborn Safety Investigations (MNSI) programme is part of a national strategy to improve maternity safety across the NHS in England. MNSI has completed over 3500 independent safety investigations, using a standardised, system focused methodology, into maternity events, including 237 maternal deaths. This webinar will explore national patterns and safety recommendations from deaths in England in the first trimester of pregnancy. Speakers: Dr Charlotte Frise Dr Louise Page Dr vidya Sundar Register for the webinar- Posted
-
- Pregnancy
- Patient death
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Event
untilThe Maternity and Newborn Safety Investigations (MNSI) programme is part of a national strategy to improve maternity safety across the NHS in England. MNSI has completed over 3500 independent safety investigations, using system focused methodology, into maternity events, including direct and indirect maternal deaths in pregnancy and up to 6 weeks postpartum. This webinar will explore the findings from MNSI's investigations into first trimester deaths in England from venous thromboembolism associated with hyperemesis. Speakers: Dr Charlotte Frise Dr Louise Page Chandrima Biswas Kirsty MacLennan Register for the webinar- Posted
-
- Maternity
- Patient death
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Event
untilThe Maternity and Newborn Safety Investigations (MNSI) programme is part of a national strategy to improve maternity safety across the NHS in England. MNSI has completed over 3500 independent safety investigations, using system focused methodology, into maternity events, including direct and indirect maternal deaths in pregnancy and up to 6 weeks postpartum. This webinar will explore a thematic analysis of safety investigations into Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP). Speakers: Dr Charlotte Frise Dr Louise Page Joanna Girling Emily Barrow Register for the webinar- Posted
-
- Epilepsy
- Investigation
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Event
untilThe Maternity and Newborn Safety Investigations (MNSI) programme is part of a national strategy to improve maternity safety across the NHS in England. MNSI has completed over 3500 independent safety investigations, using system focused methodology, into maternity events, including direct and indirect maternal deaths in pregnancy and up to 6 weeks postpartum. This webinar will explore learnings following maternal deaths secondary to HLH and consider learning points for future clinicians and investigators. Speakers: Dr Charlotte Frise Dr Bethan Goulden Dr Louise Page Clare Luby Register for the webinar -
News Article
Call to overhaul obesity diagnoses amid fears of over-reliance on BMI
Patient-Safety-Learning posted a news article in News
Doctors are proposing a “radical overhaul” of how obesity is diagnosed worldwide amid concerns that a reliance on body mass index may be causing millions of people to be misdiagnosed. More than 1 billion people are thought to be living with the condition that for decades has been diagnosed by measuring a person’s BMI (their ratio of height to weight) to estimate the amount of excess body fat they have. However, there are fears BMI on its own is not a “reliable measure” of an individual’s health and may be resulting in both under- and over-diagnosis of obesity, with “negative consequences” for those affected and wider society. Dozens of the world’s leading experts across a broad range of medical specialisms – including endocrinology, internal medicine, surgery, biology, nutrition and public health – are now calling for a “reframing” of the condition that is causing major harm on every continent and costing countries billions. Prof Francesco Rubino, the chair of the Lancet commission which produced the report, said the changes would provide an opportunity for health systems globally to adopt a universal, clinically relevant definition of obesity and a more accurate method for its diagnosis. He said: “The question of whether obesity is a disease is flawed because it presumes an implausible all-or-nothing scenario where obesity is either always a disease or never a disease. Evidence, however, shows a more nuanced reality. Some individuals with obesity can maintain normal organs’ function and overall health, even long term, whereas others display signs and symptoms of severe illness here and now." Read full story Source: The Guardian, 14 January 2024 -
News Article
New dementia cases in US projected to double to 1 million by 2060: Study
Patient-Safety-Learning posted a news article in News
New cases of dementia in the United States are projected to double in the next three decades, a new study suggests. The study, published this week in the journal Nature Medicine, looked at more than 15,000 people and estimated the lifetime risk of dementia from ages 55 to 95. The team—including researchers from Johns Hopkins University, Mayo Clinic and New York University—projected new US dementia cases would double from more than 500,000 in 2020 to approximately one million by 2060. The authors said this increase is directly tied to the ageing of the US population. The study also showed that the risk of developing dementia after age 55 is 42%, more than double the risk seen by older studies. After age 75, the lifetime risk increases to more than 50%, according to the study. "Our study results forecast a dramatic rise in the burden from dementia in the United States over the coming decades, with one in two Americans expected to experience cognitive difficulties after age 55," Dr Josef Coresh, a study senior investigator, epidemiologist and founding director of the Optimal Aging Institute at NYU Langone, said. Read full story Source: ABC News, 14 January 2025 -
News Article
Elective recovery scheme ‘wide open to gaming’
Patient-Safety-Learning posted a news article in News
Plans to pay trusts to validate and sometimes remove patients from their waiting lists could be “wide open to gaming” and create a public perception problem, senior NHS figures have told HSJ. The new proposals were set out in the elective reform plan, published last week, which says NHS England “will ensure validation is, for the first time, formally reflected as a form of activity within the 2025-26 NHS Payment Scheme”. HSJ understands the plans, already piloted by 10 trusts, involve relatively modest payments being paid to providers for “clock stops”—where an entry is removed from the referral to treatment waiting list—achieved by checking whether the entry remains valid. So-called “removals other than treatment”, known as ROTTs, from the waiting list are common, and happen for numerous reasons such as patients moving house, no longer requiring the treatment, or having been treated elsewhere. Waiting list expert Barry Mulholland, a partner at the MBI Health consultancy, said he was in favour of paying providers for ROTTs, but understood “concerns” among some in the NHS “that it provides an increased risk that patients may be removed incorrectly”. Further details of the scheme are expected in the delayed 2025-26 NHS planning guidance. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 15 January 2025- Posted
-
- Long waiting list
- Outpatients
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
GPs turn to AI to help with patient workload
Patient-Safety-Learning posted a news article in News
The difficulty of getting an appointment with a GP is a familiar gripe in the UK. Even when an appointment is secured, the rising workload faced by doctors means those meetings can be shorter than either the doctor or patient would like. But Dr Deepali Misra-Sharp, a GP partner in Birmingham, has found that AI has alleviated a chunk of the administration from her job, meaning she can focus more on patients. Dr Mirsa-Sharp started using Heidi Health, a free AI-assisted medical transcription tool that listens and transcribes patient appointments, about four months ago and says it has made a big difference. “Usually when I’m with a patient, I am writing things down and it takes away from the consultation,” she says. “This now means I can spend my entire time locking eyes with the patient and actively listening. It makes for a more quality consultation." She says the tech reduces her workflow, saving her “two to three minutes per consultation, if not more”. She reels off other benefits: “It reduces the risk of errors and omissions in my medical note taking." With a workforce in decline while the number of patients continues to grow, GPs face immense pressure. Read full story Source: BBC News, 14 January 2025 -
News Article
Failure to act on coroners’ advice blamed for thousands of deaths
Patient-Safety-Learning posted a news article in News
One woman who tracks preventable deaths says the failure to take action when inquests identify threats to life is ‘mind-blowing’. Thousands of deaths could be prevented every year if public bodies took action over concerns highlighted at inquests. Almost 82,000 deaths in 2022 were recorded by the Office for National Statistics in England and Wales as “preventable”, meaning they could have been avoided “through effective public health and primary prevention interventions”. Analysis by the Preventable Deaths Tracker project at King’s College London revealed that 1,495 Prevention of Future Deaths reports (28 per cent of the total) have not received any responses and another 741 (14 per cent) received only partial responses. Once reports are issued there is no official monitoring of responses or whether any action follows. Coroners have no powers to ask further questions or request progress reports on reforms. The founder of the Preventable Deaths Tracker, the epidemiologist Dr Georgia Richards, said it was “mind-blowing” there was no system to disseminate learning from inquests. “Across 5,000 reports over the last 12 years, it is impossible to know anything about what action that might or might not have been taken following a coroner’s report,” Richards said. "People think there must be a system that’s protecting us. We assume that if you were in government that you would want to know what’s happening in these death investigations. But the system doesn’t work, it’s a waste of time. There are very few PFDs that have led to meaningful change and often it’s not the PFD that triggered it. Change comes from additional factors like change in leadership of the organisation, huge media scrutiny or dedicated families.” Peter Thornton KC, chief coroner from 2012-16, said: “First, there are not enough coroners writing these reports. Secondly, they can’t force a response. Thirdly, they can’t follow up a response. Fourthly, they can’t force action — they can only suggest that an area of action is considered. And last, there’s no national follow-up, there’s no co-ordination.” Thornton urged reform through the creation of a national coroner service. The inquest system is jointly managed by the judiciary, local councils and the police. It is poorly funded and has big backlogs: 1,685 bereaved families are waiting longer than two years for hearings. Read full story Source: The Times, 14 January 2025 (paywalled) Related reading Five recommendations to prevent future deaths: Written evidence for the Parliamentary follow-up Inquiry to The Coroner Service (Georgia Richards, 9 February 2024) Patient Safety Learning - Mind the implementation gap: The persistence of avoidable harm in the NHS (7 April 2022)- Posted
-
- Coroner
- Implementation
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
People working in healthcare will sometimes see things at work that cause them concern, such as a situation or action that is causing or could cause harm to a patient, member of staff or the public. If you work in health and social care and have concerns that you would like to raise, here are some helpful sources of advice and information about speaking up. If you would like to add an organisation or resource to this page, please contact us. National Guardian’s Office (England) The National Guardian’s Office and the role of the Freedom to Speak Up (FTSU) Guardian were created in response to recommendations made in Sir Robert Francis QC’s report “The Freedom to Speak Up” (2015). The office leads, trains and supports a network of FTSU Guardians in England and conducts speaking up reviews to identify learning and support improvement of the speaking up culture of the healthcare sector. There are over 1,200 FTSU guardians in NHS and independent sector organisations, national bodies and elsewhere that ensure workers can speak up about any issues impacting on their ability to do their job. Find your local FTSU Guardian Guidance on how to speak up within your organisation and to regulators Email: [email protected] Phone: 0191 249 4400, 10am—4pm, Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays) Independent National Whistleblowing Office (Scotland) The Independent National Whistleblowing Officer (INWO) is the final stage of the process for those raising whistleblowing concerns about the NHS in Scotland. The INWO developed a set of National Whistleblowing Standards that set out the high level principles and a detailed procedure for investigating concerns. National Whistleblowing Standards Information about complaining to the INWO Email: [email protected] Phone: 0800 008 6112, Monday, Wednesday and Friday 9am-1pm, Tuesday and Thursday 12pm-4pm Labour Relations Agency (Northern Ireland) The Labour Relations Agency provides a free, impartial and confidential employment relations service to people engaged in industry, commerce and the public services. Services include advice on good employment practices and helping resolve disputes through conciliation, mediation and arbitration services. Workplace Information Service: 03300 555 300 Protect Founded in 1993, Protect is the UK’s leading whistleblowing charity. They aim to stop harm by encouraging safe whistleblowing and offer free expert and confidential advice on how best to raise a concern. They can also advise on the specific legal rights and protections available to whistleblowers and on some other connected rights. Contact form Advice line: 0203 117 2520, Tuesday and Thursday 9:30am–1pm, 2pm–5:30pm. Wednesday and Friday 9:30am–1pm (excluding Bank Holidays) Speak Up Direct Speak Up Direct offers free, independent, confidential advice and guidance on speaking up. They have an online tool to help health and social care staff decide the best path to take to raise their concerns. Online tool Contact form Helpline: 08000 724 725, 8am-6pm, Monday to Friday WhistleblowersUK WhistleblowersUK is a not-for-profit organisation providing help, information and support to enable you to understand whistleblowing and the best way to raise concerns or escalate them. You can submit information about your concern and situation via a crypto encrypted password-protected platform for review by a team of experts from a wide range of sectors who will suggest courses of action, which may include signposting to other organisations. Submit an anonymous, encrypted message Regulators and unions Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) Guidance on whistleblowing to the NMC General Medical Council (GMC) Guidance on raising and acting on concerns about patient safety Care Quality Commission (CQC) Report a concern if you are a member of staff British Medical Association (BMA) Raising a concern: guide for doctors Police service If you believe you have witnessed or been the victim of a crime, you should contact the police on 101. If the situation is an emergency, call 999. Patient Safety Learning is unable to offer advice on individual cases, and will always signpost you to the organisations listed.- Posted
-
- Speaking up
- Whistleblowing
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Community Post
Our 'Speaking up for patient safety' interview series highlights some of the issues that healthcare staff who raise concerns about patient safety face. If you have spoken up about unsafe care, have been a whistleblower, or have been put off raising concerns, we would like to invite you to share your reflections. What encouraged or discouraged you from raising your concerns? What support did you receive from your employer or elsewhere, and how helpful was it? How can organisations make it safer for staff to speak up when they see something that worries them? What changes need to be made to the legal system and other national systems to improve the situation for staff who speak up? Read information about organisations that offer support and guidance for staff about speaking up and whistleblowing on the hub. -
Content Article
Patient Safety Learning and retired urology consultant Peter Duffy have launched a new interview series, ‘Speaking up for patient safety’. Peter is an NHS whistleblower and Chair of the Healthcare Working Group at WhistleblowersUK. The series looks at how people who speak up in healthcare are treated by organisations, leaders and regulators, and how this acts as a barrier to staff raising patient safety concerns. In each interview, Peter and Patient Safety Learning’s Chief Executive Helen Hughes talk to someone who has spoken up about patient safety in healthcare, or who works to help staff raise concerns. In this blog, Peter and Helen explain the concepts of speaking up and whistleblowing and outline why creating a safe environment for speaking up is vital for patient safety. They share why they decided to produce the interview series and outline the impact they hope giving people who have spoken up a platform to share their experiences and insights will have. You can follow the interview series on the hub and by subscribing to the series YouTube podcast. "After I lost my own career as a direct consequence of whistleblowing, I found myself unemployed and prematurely claiming my NHS pension many years before I had ever anticipated stepping away from full-time work. As well as the personal cost, it meant that the unsafe care I reported went unchanged and opportunities to make care safer for patients were lost. It left me determined to prevent the same kind of catastrophic consequences and cover-ups happening to the next generation of patients and healthcare professionals, a cause that Patient Safety Learning is also committed to." Peter Duffy "I hear stories like Peter’s so often, it’s a pattern that is repeated across healthcare all the time. We need to expose the unfairness of doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals being required to raise concerns, and then being vilified when they do so. The horrendous impact on their lives and careers when the system closes in on them is something we desperately need to address. Staff need to feel safe to share their genuine concerns and insights—and these must be listened to and acted upon to improve patient and staff safety. It’s vital we explore how we can make changes to legislation, leadership and management and culture so that we can stop this awful cycle repeating itself." Helen Hughes We decided to collaborate on a series of interviews that would draw together the voices of some of the people who have spoken up for safety and found themselves treated poorly by the organisations and systems they were trying to make safer. Speaking up, whistleblowing and patient safety People working in healthcare will sometimes see things at work that cause them concern. They might notice a situation or action that is causing or could cause harm to a patient, staff member or the public. For example, they might see a patient safety incident that isn’t dealt with properly or a risk that is not being taken seriously. They may witness dishonest behaviour, bullying, harassment or discrimination. When someone reports their concerns with the aim of making things better or stopping something from going wrong, they are ‘speaking up’. In some cases—but not all—when someone speaks up, it is also defined as ‘whistleblowing’. Although the two terms are often used interchangeably, whistleblowing refers to the sharing of ‘protected disclosures’ which have a specific legal definition, as outlined in the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA).[1] Whistleblowing always involves a concern that is in the public interest to raise and might relate to a criminal offence, health and safety risks, failures to carry out legal obligations, a miscarriage of justice, or an attempt to conceal and cover up any of these things. PIDA was designed to offer some protection from retaliatory action for whistleblowers. However, many whistleblowers report that the reality of their experience was that there was little to protect them from retaliatory grievances and disciplinary action by their organisation’s management. The repercussions of speaking up act as a significant barrier to people sharing concerns about patient safety. Healthcare staff often fear that they will lose their career and that it will affect their work and personal lives if they step out and speak up. Many people decide it just isn’t worth the risk. But speaking up and whistleblowing are vital to improving patient and staff safety and standards of care. By raising concerns, staff offer their organisations opportunities to learn from things that could go or are going wrong, and mitigate risks. In addition, all registered healthcare professionals have a professional duty of care to raise concerns. Many people we interview in this series make the same comment; that in speaking up, they were just doing their job. For these reasons, it is vital to create a culture where staff feel safe and supported to fulfil their obligations to raise concerns without fear that it will affect their career prospects, working life and personal wellbeing. Creating this kind of environment contributes to what is sometimes referred to as ‘psychological safety’. While there are currently measures in place to encourage and support staff to speak up, they clearly aren’t working effectively—despite so many regulators, potential targets and available sanctions in the NHS, individual and organisational scandals in healthcare just keep happening. Candour, ethical behaviour and honesty are key things we need in place to maximise patient safety in the healthcare system. The importance of first-hand experience and insights Peter’s experience of speaking up is one of many that clearly demonstrates that the current system of regulation and safeguarding is not effective. We decided to start this interview series because we believe it’s time to identify and deal with the cultural and organisational issues that make it difficult for people to raise concerns about patient safety issues. The national NHS Staff Survey results tell us that too many healthcare staff are nervous to speak up when they see unsafe care or inappropriate behaviour. In spite of slight progress in some areas, 37% of all staff who responded still feel unsafe to speak up about concerns—that’s about 260,000 people. Almost 50% said they were not confident that their organisation would address concerns raised.[2] It’s so important that we hear the voices of people who have gone through the difficulty of speaking up or whistleblowing as they have unique and highly valuable insights. Their experiences of internal investigations, complaints processes and employment tribunals demonstrate that the systems that are supposed to support people who speak up often neglect their needs. The reasons for this include pressure from organisational leaders, a culture of not wanting to hear bad news and prioritising organisational reputation above patient and staff safety. It’s vital that we understand the cost individuals have paid for taking action that they believe to be right and that their professional standards require. During the series we speak to experienced and committed healthcare professionals who have received threats, abuse and gaslighting from their employers. Some have lost their careers as a result and many describe the significant impact on their work life, private life and health. The interviews are informal and although the interviewees will have a rough idea of where the discussions are likely to lead, we challenge and explore their opinions. Our aim is to draw out the details that might help us better understand the nature and extent of specific issues—from threats and retaliation from other staff to human resources practices and employment tribunals. We start each conversation by inviting our guest to share their own experience of whistleblowing or speaking up, or of working with people in that space. We discuss the consequences for whistleblowers, as well as for patients and families, when organisations fail to respond well to staff who raise concerns. We then invite each guest to reflect on any areas for learning that can be drawn from their experience and make suggestions of ways to better protect both NHS staff and patients. In some interviews we look at whether healthcare regulators and the legal system are appropriately designed or equipped to protect whistleblowers and staff who speak up, as well as the public interest. Amplifying voices for change If enough healthcare staff, patients, families and motivated members of the public take notice of the issues we’re raising, then the pressure for change can only increase. Our hope is that we can convince leaders across the sectors that real, profound and lasting progress will be in the best interests of all of us. We’d like to see changes to the way that safeguarding and whistleblowing are viewed within our political, judicial and regulatory systems. But to achieve this, we need to see more urgency from those who have the power to make real change. We are seeing some examples of positive movement, but this remains slow and patchy and there is resistance to change from parts of the legal profession and healthcare leaders. Towards the end of last year, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Wes Streeting MP, launched a new consultation on government proposals to regulate health service managers, ensuring they follow professional standards and are held to account. As part of this announcement, he stressed the Government’s commitment to protect whistleblowers by introducing regulation for managers and enforcement measures to tackle managers who “silence whistleblowers or endanger patients through misconduct.”[3] We welcome this commitment, and Patient Safety Learning will be responding to the consultation. However, these words need to be accompanied by prompt and decisive action, or the gap between what many NHS organisations say to employees about speaking up and whistleblowing and what happens in practice will remain. The statistics that estimate the worrying extent of avoidable harm in the UK [5] need action right now, not in a year, or five, or ten. We believe any drive to bring these awful figures down needs to include a relentless focus on safeguarding, speaking up and accountability. Get involved If you have spoken up about unsafe care or have been a whistleblower in healthcare or social care, we would love to hear from you about your experience. You can: contribute to our community conversation (you’ll need to sign up first) comment on any hub post (you’ll need to sign up first) contact us at [email protected] and we can share your story anonymously. You can find information about organisations that offer support and guidance for staff about speaking up and whistleblowing on the hub. Listen to the interviews Helené Donnelly in conversation with Peter Duffy and Helen Hughes Martyn Pitman in conversation with Peter Duffy and Helen Hughes Jayne Chidgey-Clark in conversation with Peter Duffy and Helen Hughes Gordon Caldwell in conversation with Peter Duffy and Helen Hughes Bernie Rochford MBE in conversation with Peter Duffy and Helen Hughes Beatrice Fraenkel in conversation with Peter Duffy and Helen Hughes Chelcie Jewitt in conversation with Peter Duffy and Helen Hughes Michael Swinn in conversation with Peter Duffy and Helen Hughes Rebecca Wight in conversation with Peter Duffy and Helen Hughes Related reading Key themes emerging from our ‘Speaking up for patient safety’ interview series The whistleblower playbook References 1 UK Government. Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998. Accessed 11 December 2024 2 NHS Staff Survey. NHS Staff Survey National Results 2023. Accessed 11 December 2024 3 Department of Health and Social Care, UK Government. New protections for whistleblowers under NHS manager proposals. 24 November 2024 4 J Elgot and D Campbell. Managers who silence whistleblowers ‘will never work in NHS again’, vows Streeting. The Guardian. 27 June 2024 4 J Illingworth, A Shaw, R Fernandez Crespo et al. National State of Patient Safety 2022: What we know about avoidable harm in England. Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, 2022- Posted
-
1
-
- Speaking up
- Whistleblowing
- (and 4 more)
-
Content Article
In this interview series, NHS whistleblower Peter Duffy and Patient Safety Learning’s Chief Executive Helen Hughes explore how the healthcare system responds when its staff raise concerns about patient safety. In each episode, Helen and Peter interview someone who has spoken up about patient safety issues in healthcare organisations, or who works to help staff raise concerns where they see unsafe care. In this interview, Peter and Helen speak to Helené Donnelly OBE, who spoke up about unsafe care she witnessed while working as a nurse at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust. Helené contributed as a witness to the inquiry led by Sir Robert Francis KC into failings at the trust and was also an advisor in the Freedom to Speak up Review in 2015, where she called for the creation of Freedom to Speak Up Guardians in the NHS. Helené explains why she decided to raise concerns about the quality of nursing care at Stafford Hospital A&E and describes the bullying and threats she received from other staff as a result. She discusses with Peter and Helen the barriers that still prevent staff speaking up today and what can be done to create a more open and responsive culture in teams and organisations. Helené highlights the need to reform how human resources departments respond to staff raising concerns and the vital role of embedding speaking up and organisational culture in the curriculum of all healthcare professional training courses. Subscribe to our YouTube podcast to keep up to date with the latest episodes. View a transcript of this interview Read a blog from Peter and Helen about the interview series- Posted
- 2 comments
-
2
-
- Whistleblowing
- Speaking up
- (and 6 more)
-
Content Article
Despite medication being the most common healthcare intervention and medication-related incidents being common in hospitals, many rural and remote hospitals in Australia lack onsite pharmacy services due to resource constraints. This study examined the outcomes of a Virtual Clinical Pharmacy Service (VCPS) staffed by two senior, rural generalist hospital pharmacists assigned to four hospitals each that was implemented in rural and remote facilities. It aimed to determine whether the VCPS increased adherence to National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards (NSQHS). The study demonstrated that the VCPS: improved compliance with national standards for medication safety had high patient acceptability resulted in the detection of clinically relevant medication-related issues in rural and remote settings. The authors recommend that the possibilities of virtual pharmacy should be explored in further rural and remote locations, in addition to other settings such as urban locations with no onsite clinical pharmacists.- Posted
-
- Digital health
- Consultation
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
In this interview, Dana Edelson, an expert in cardiac resuscitation at the University of Chicago, discusses how hospitals can best use early warning score tools to risk stratify patients—without adding to clinicians’ alarm fatigue. Dana recently co-authored a study which compared six different early warning scores designed to recognise clinical deterioration in hospitalised patients, including three proprietary AI tools.- Posted
-
- Deterioration
- Sepsis
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
The early recognition of sepsis and septic shock is crucial for improved patient outcomes. Quality improvement programs have ameliorated processes and outcomes in the care of patients with sepsis and septic shock. This study in the Journal of Patient Safety aimed to improve the proportion of patients receiving antibiotics within one hour of triage and compliance with sepsis bundles. A multidisciplinary sepsis task force was created to monitor and improve sepsis care. The program lasted 24 months from January 2018 to December 2019. A unique screening criterion was created by combining items from the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, quick sequential organ failure assessment, and National Early Warning Score systems. After this initial stage, a sepsis flowsheet was implemented in the emergency department for monitoring. The measures between the first 12 months and the last 12 months were compared and showed that: the proportion of patients receiving antibiotics within one hour of triage improved from 44% to 84%. intravenous crystalloid administration within three hours improved from 62% to 94%. serum lactic acid measurement within three hours improved from 62% to 94%. vasopressor initiation within six hours improved from 76% to 94%. mortality rates decreased from 32% to 21% between the 2 study periods.- Posted
-
- Sepsis
- Emergency medicine
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Content Article
The Covid-19 pandemic, which rapidly escalated into a global crisis that impacted millions of lives and disrupted economies around the world, was a wake-up call for the management of infectious disease outbreaks. Dr Stella Chungong and Dr Landry Ndriko Mayigane work for the Health Security Preparedness Department in the World Health Organization’s Health Emergencies Programme. In this article, they encourage countries to implement early action reviews (EARs) of disease outbreaks. EARs help countries assess their vigilance, planning and responsiveness, and could help countries be better prepared during outbreaks. The guidelines detail three time-based metrics, named 7-1-7, which offer a simple, structured approach to outbreak management: 7 Days to Detect, which measures how quickly the country can detect a suspected disease outbreak, with the aim being detection within 7 days. 1 Day to Notify, which measures the time taken to notify relevant public health authorities and stakeholders, with the aim being notification within 1 day. This goal is not new; it is consistent with the International Health Regulations (2005) that require countries to notify the relevant authorities within 24 hours of detecting a disease outbreak. 7 Days to Respond measures how quickly the country can establish a response to the outbreak, the aim being the instigation of effective response actions within 7 days.- Posted
-
- Pandemic
- Infection control
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
This open access book explores epistemic justice in mental healthcare, bringing together perspectives from psychologists, psychiatrists, philosophers, activists and lived experience researchers. Through eight chapters, authors identify threats to the agency of people who hear voices, experience depression, have psychotic symptoms, live with dementia, are diagnosed with personality disorders, and face serious mental health issues while receiving palliative care. Considering the power asymmetries in clinical interactions, where patients are vulnerable and healthcare professionals are uniquely placed to offer support, this book reaffirms the importance of recognizing patients as agents and collaborators. Topics covered include trust in the therapeutic relationship, dignity at the end of life, the social dimension of health, stigma in an acute ward, the harm caused by biases and stereotypes, the role of clinical communication and the promise of digital health.- Posted
-
- Mental health
- Patient engagement
- (and 3 more)
-
Content Article
The impact of a patient safety incident (PSI) on nurses and doctors in hospital settings has been studied in depth. However, the impact of a PSI on general practitioners and how those health care professionals can be supported are less clear. This Belgian study investigated the prevalence of GPs (in training) being personally involved in a PSI, as well as the impact, the support needed and open disclosure in the aftermath of these PSIs.- Posted
-
- Second victim
- GP
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
News Article
Ambulance handover delays hit record high
Patient-Safety-Learning posted a news article in News
Long ambulance handover delays hit record levels in the past week as the winter crisis in the NHS reached its height. There were an average of 2,834 hour-long handover delays every day in the week to 4 January, according to the latest NHS winter sitrep data released today. That was the highest since records began. The previous record was at the start of January 2023—a time of intense and high-profile pressures on services, due to a very high flu peak and ongoing Covid-19, when many patients were harmed. At that time a daily average of 2,682 hour-long delays were reported. Since then, cutting handover delays has been a high priority of government and NHSE. On Monday, HSJ reported long ambulance handover delays were surging in the Midlands and northern regions, which have recorded more of them than in the 2022-23 winter. Sir Stephen Powis, NHS England’s national medical director, said: “It is clear that hospitals are under exceptional pressure at the start of this new year, with mammoth demand stemming from this ongoing cold weather snap and respiratory viruses like flu—all on the back of 2024 being the busiest year on record for A&E and ambulance teams." Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 9 January 2025