Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Today
  3. News Article
    A lawsuit 21 July claims that ChatGPT offered inaccurate medical guidance to a Florida man that resulted in delayed care for a pulmonary embolism last year. The lawsuit, filed in the Superior Court of California in San Francisco, accuses OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman of negligence, unlicensed practice of medicine, defective product design and other claims. It is among the first to allege that a chatbot’s health advice caused physical injury to a user seeking guidance about a medical condition, according to The New York Times, and the plaintiff has asked the court to stop ChatGPT Health from operating until independent evaluators verify its safety. According to the complaint, ChatGPT-4o told Scott Winters, a pastor, that early signs of his health problems were “not something dangerous” and discouraged him from seeking medical care, urging him instead to trust that “God did not design your body to endlessly fail.” Mr. Winters, 55, claims ChatGPT manipulated his own language and beliefs with the knowledge that he was a pastor. He began using ChatGPT in 2024 for everyday questions and general health queries. Over time, the lawsuit claims, the chatbot’s disclaimers urging him to seek professional care fell away, and it began offering direct guidance instead — including, when he described dizziness and blood pressure instability in June 2025, advice to stay home and “recliner-bound.” Mr. Winters followed the guidance and limited his movement. “ChatGPT-4o positioned itself as an authoritative partner in a medical journey it was simultaneously designing for Scott,” alleges the complaint, which includes screenshots of Mr. Winters’ exchanges with the chatbot. Read full story Source: Becker's Hospital Review, 22 July 2026
  4. News Article
    Children living in the poorest areas across England are 40% more likely to be admitted to hospital for respiratory infections, an analysis of NHS England data shows, with experts raising the alarm on the impact of air pollution on young people’s health. The analysis, based on data obtained via freedom of information requests by the charity Impact on Urban Health, revealed 1,941 out of every 100,000 children living in the most deprived fifth of England were admitted to hospital for respiratory illnesses in 2024/25. The high admission rate contrasted starkly with figures on England’s least deprived area, where 1,380 out of every 100,000 children were admitted to hospital for respiratory illnesses, including acute upper and lower respiratory infections, influenza and pneumonia, that same year. Although the data did not provide an exact cause for these hospital admissions, air pollution was identified as a significant risk factor, with children living in deprived areas exposed to the most extreme levels of toxins and pollutants. “Children growing up in deprived neighbourhoods are often exposed to dirtier air,” said Dr Gergo Baranyi, a senior research fellow at University College London with a focus on air pollution. “But air pollution is only part of the story. Poor-quality housing, overcrowding, damp and mould, outdated heating systems, indoor air quality and exposure to smoking, are also more common in deprived areas. These conditions can all harm children’s respiratory health. He added that the “stark” inequalities in admission rates should not come as a surprise. “They are shaped by individual circumstances and environmental exposures where children grow up. Respiratory infections in childhood can have long-lasting consequences on health and wellbeing." Read full story Source: The Guardian, 23 July 2026
  5. News Article
    A trust that treated a man with paranoid schizophrenia who went on to kill three people is being investigated for corporate manslaughter. A criminal inquiry has been launched into Nottinghamshire Healthcare Foundation Trust’s care and treatment of Valdo Calocane, who killed Barnaby Webber, Grace O’Malley-Kumar, and Ian Coates in June 2023. Three others were seriously injured after Mr Calocane drove a van into them. The investigation – which will run for several months – is being carried out by Northumbria Police because Nottinghamshire Police is implicated in failings related to the attack, The Times reported last night. In a statement, the trust said it would be “cooperating fully”. It said: “We know how important the independent inquiry and police investigation are for the affected families, the survivors and our local communities.” A public inquiry opened in February this year and ran until June. It heard evidence of poor communication between agencies, flawed risk assessments, failures to escalate Mr Calocane’s treatment, and discharging a high-risk patient after he disengaged with services. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 22 July 2026
  6. Content Article
    Large numbers of patients continue to be harmed as a result of safety incidents, and current approaches to responding to and learning from safety incidents are increasingly questioned for their effectiveness in reducing harm. Many types of incidents are frequently repeated across the NHS and organisations struggle to implement policies to improve safety and share learning. As a result, NHS England launched a new national policy framework, the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) that has far-reaching implications at all levels of healthcare by seeking to create incident response and learning processes that are more proactive, proportionate, flexible, learning-focused, equitable and fair. The launch of PSIRF offers a unique opportunity to explore and learn from the real-time implementation of a new national patient safety policy, including the logics and objectives underlying the policy, how the policy is interpreted and enacted across a range of stakeholder groups, what the policy changes and improves, and what lessons might be learned for future policy design and implementation. This multilevel, mixed-methods evaluation will explore PSIRF implementation nationally and organisationally. The evaluation is divided into three phases. Phase 1 will examine the policy context before the PSIRF is introduced. The logic underpinning the policy will be analysed through interviews with policymakers. An evaluation of pre-implementation context will involve a rapid review and rapid qualitative data collection at six case study organisations from three NHS regions. Phase 2 will examine policy implementation. A national longitudinal survey of all English NHS Trusts and Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) will explore key indicators and aspects of PSIRF implementation. A documentary analysis of selected NHS Trust implementation plans will examine how PSIRF is interpreted and enacted and workshops with patient safety leads will explore safety metrics and local experiences. Qualitative analyses relating to national events and supporting resources will explore ongoing PSIRF implementation, and a national survey of patients and families involved in Patient Safety Incident Investigations under PSIRF will be conducted to understand the perspectives of patients. Organisational ethnography will be conducted across the six case study organisations to explore PSIRF implementation over time. Phase 3 will integrate all findings to understand what worked in the implementation of the PSIRF and why. Outputs and dissemination We will disseminate widely through publications in academic journals, public talks, practice and policy facing reports and other mechanisms including blogs and podcasts. The main output will be a document to guide the development and implementation of future patient safety policy.
  7. Content Article
    In this podcast interview series, NHS whistleblower Peter Duffy and Patient Safety Learning’s Chief Executive Helen Hughes explore how the healthcare system responds when its staff raise concerns about patient safety. In each episode, Helen and Peter interview someone who has spoken up about patient safety issues in healthcare organisations, or who works to help staff raise concerns where they see unsafe care. In this episode, Helen and Peter speak to Bethany Carter, currently Head of Quality and Clinical Governance at Combat Stress. Bethany discusses her career from military nursing and infection control to becoming a Freedom to Speak Up Guardian and later a senior leader at the National Guardian’s Office. She reflects on how organisational culture determines whether staff feel safe to raise concerns, drawing on both positive and negative personal experiences of speaking up. The interview explores the importance of supporting Guardians, strengthening managers’ ability to listen and respond, protecting staff from detriment, and maintaining independent national oversight as the National Guardian’s Office closes. Bethany's central advice is that anyone with a concern should not be deterred by terminology or process: they should find someone they trust, seek support and speak up so organisations can learn and improve. Subscribe to our YouTube podcast to keep up to date with the latest episodes. Transcript of the interview Read a blog from Peter and Helen about the interview series
  8. Yesterday
  9. Content Article Comment
    Excellent. And to add: the absence of patient voices in design and evaluation of services and all learning and action and its implementation in response to safety incidents ( weaknesses structurally also built in to HSSIBs own processes at all levels- compared to attempts by its pilot HSIB) means the patient pathway is not centred or understood or worked for. Inevitably fragmentation and reputational focus worsens these dynamics and nothing is conceived to mitigate these knowb risks. Patients continue to fall between greater dangerous cracks in a system not designed to what is needed. This is even worse for all discriminated against groups. This can be put in the framework of systemic epistemic exclusion and harm , embedded, reinforced, developed and never ecamined. Even within this occurs just within services eg maternity, the consequences of this are horrific and continuing, scandalous, significantly avoidable if only....
  10. News Article
    A healthcare trust has defended its decision to abandon a controversial digital monitoring system for mental health patients. Leicestershire Partnership Trust (LPT) gave evidence on Tuesday during the Lampard Inquiry in London, which is examining the deaths of more than 2,000 people under the care of Essex mental health services between 2000 and 2023. The Leicestershire trust piloted a system which uses infrared sensors and cameras in patients' bedrooms, but decided not to use it. Oxevision is used by a number of mental health trusts across England, including neighbouring Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust where bosses are looking to expand its use. Grave concerns about the system have been raised previously in the inquiry with campaigners claiming it had been overly relied upon by staff at Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust. Campaign group Stop Oxevision has said it had concerns around patient's dignity, privacy and consent processes which vary across the country, but the creators of the system have said it is an important safety aid. The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) recently confirmed it was investigating Oxehealth, which developed Oxevision, and said "as this is a live investigation, we are unable to comment further". Andres Freire-Patino, deputy director of mental health services at LPT, who began working at the trust in 2023, told the inquiry that one of the aims of the pilot was to test whether Oxevision could support patients getting a better night sleep. Oxevision can digitally track pulse rates and breathing rates, so this does not need to be done in-person and disturb patients throughout the night. Freire-Patino said: "Sleep is incredibly important in terms of people's recovery from mental health." However, the inquiry heard one patient - a pregnant woman - slept in an interview room as she refused to stay in a bedroom with Oxevision, even with it off. Freire-Patino said there were a number of reasons why they decided not to use the technology, but one was only 42% of patients consented to its use during the second pilot. Read full story Source: BBC News, 22 July 2026
  11. News Article
    England is seeing a "worrying increase" in young women in their 20s developing type 2 diabetes, experts at Imperial College London have warned. The rise has largely occurred since the Covid pandemic and is closely linked to increasing obesity levels, according to an analysis of NHS data from 2011 to 2024, external. Type 2 diabetes is serious, and can lead to severe complications, such as heart attacks and strokes. When it develops at a younger age, the disease tends to be more aggressive, raising the risk of devastating complications and cutting lives short, according to Diabetes UK. It is vital that those at risk are diagnosed early to prevent long-term organ damage, the charity says. Type 2 diabetes can sometimes be put into remission by eating a healthy diet and keeping slim without needing to rely on glucose-lowering medications. The researchers say newer obesity treatments - such as GLP-1 jabs and pills - might help, alongside healthy eating advice. Read full story Source: BBC News, 22 July 2026
  12. News Article
    More than 16 million people in England and Wales risk dying from a cardiac arrest because they live farther than a 1km round trip from the nearest 24/7 defibrillator, according to exclusive research. Analysis of publicly available defibrillators by the Heart Restart campaign found that in England and Wales alone, 35 million people – more than half the population – do not live within the recommended three- to five-minute brisk walk of a defibrillator. Of these, about half live more than a 1km round trip from a 24/7 accessible defibrillator. There are more than 40,000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests each year in the UK, but fewer than one in 10 people survive. However, early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation can more than double the chance of survival. Patients in cardiac arrest who do not receive emergency treatment within 10 minutes – a 1km round trip to retrieve a defibrillator – are highly likely to die. But Heart Restart’s researchers calculated that with the exception of the City of London, all local authorities have at least some of their residents living at least 10 minutes’ round trip from their nearest 24/7 defibrillator. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 22 July 2026
  13. News Article
    Army medics could be used to prop up a service at risk of closure, a struggling trust has declared. University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay Foundation Trust’s Furness General Hospital has been unable to provide the highest level of intensive care for nearly two years due to staffing shortages. Patients needing level three ICU care are transferred 50 miles to Royal Lancaster Infirmary. The trust had recommended closing the service to the most critically ill patients on safety grounds earlier this year. However, it also continued to explore alternative service models in a bid to avoid this step. In a joint update with Lancashire and South Cumbria integrated care board on Wednesday, the trust revealed it was in “ongoing discussions with Defence Medical Services”. These included the potential use of army medics “as happens in some other hospitals elsewhere in NHS England”. Military staff have been embedded at a small number of NHS hospitals through the DMS since the last dedicated military hospitals closed in the late 1990s. However, the main focus is on the maintenance of the medic’s clinical skills, rather than the relief of workforce pressures. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 21 July 2026
  14. Content Article
    Independent Healthcare Providers Network (IHPN)’s Head of Patient Safety and Quality Governance Linda Jones looks at their past three years since the introduction of the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF), and discusses how the sector has embraced PSIRF, and what the learnings have been in the three years since it was implemented.
  15. Content Article
    This year’s World Patient Safety Day on 17 September is focused on the theme ”Safe care for noncommunicable diseases”. To support you with your World Patient Safety Day activities, Patient Safety Learning has created a poster for you to print out and display within your organisation. There are two versions attached to download: A4 and A3, with blank spaces in the top-right for organisation's to drop their logo in before printing. The third attachment features guidance on where an organisation should feature their logo and preferred size in relation within the available space. patient-safety-day-poster-A3.pdf patient-safety-day-poster-A4.pdf patient-safety-day-poster-logo-placement-guidance.pdf We'd love to see photos and hear how you're using the poster and your World Patient Safety Day activities. Comment below. You will need to be a hub member and signed in—sign up here.
  16. Last week
  17. News Article
    On 15 June 2026, over 80 representatives from simulation societies, ministries of health, hospitals, universities, international organizations, professional associations and industry partners met at the WHO Academy in Lyon for a joint event of WHO and the Society for Simulation in Europe (SESAM). Together they tackled a pressing question: how can simulation move from isolated initiatives to systematic integration within health systems? The consensus was clear: simulation is no longer a niche educational tool. Beyond training, it strengthens health systems by improving quality of care, patient safety, workforce preparedness, team performance and organisational resilience. Participants agreed the evidence for simulation’s value no longer needs to be demonstrated, but that implementation remains fragmented and too often dependent on individual local champions. Bridging that gap, they said, means both generating further evidence and raising awareness among decision-makers. “At the WHO Academy, we see simulation not simply as a training methodology but as a strategic tool for capacity-building, workforce readiness and stronger health systems,” said Dr Bart Janssens, Unit Head, Health Learning and Capacity Building. “This event is not only about discussion; it is about moving from ideas to action.” As health systems worldwide face workforce shortages, growing complexity of care and rapidly evolving competency needs, participants concluded that the question is no longer “Why simulation?” but rather how to scale it, how to sustain it, and how to ensure it becomes an integral part of stronger health systems. Read full story Source: WHO, 21 July 2026 Related reading on the hub: The role of simulation-based education, co-design and co-delivery in improving patient safety
  18. News Article
    The number of U.S. measles cases is about to exceed the total for all of last year – and it’s only July. There are now 2,260 confirmed cases in 44 states and the District of Columbia, according to the latest numbers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2025 was the worst year for measles in America in over three decades. There were 2,289 cases and three deaths. The majority of cases are in young, unvaccinated children and teenagers, and doctors have blamed vaccine hesitancy on recent spikes. The measles-mumps-rubella vaccine is 97% effective in preventing illness. Without it, measles infections can lead to life-threatening brain swelling, pneumonia, fever, ear infections and a rash. Fortunately, no patient has died from measles this year. More than 30 outbreaks have been reported this year, with the largest number of cases in South Carolina, Utah and Texas. Read full story Source: The Independent, 20 July 2026
  19. News Article
    Healthcare technology firm, Craneware, has disclosed it suffered a cyber attack resulting in the theft of customer and employee data. The Edinburgh-based company, which supplies software to thousands of hospitals, clinics, and pharmacies across the US healthcare sector, confirmed it is actively responding to and investigating the incident. Craneware, listed on London’s Alternative Investment Market (AIM), stated that a significant volume of file names were viewed and exfiltrated during the breach. “The current assessment is that a large element of the data involved is non-sensitive or already public regulatory data,” according to the company. “A percentage of Craneware employee data as well as a subset of customer and partner records have been accessed and exfiltrated.” Read full story Source: The Independent, 20 July 2026
  20. Content Article
    In this episode of Leading Improvement in Health and Care, Penny Pereira speaks with Professor Frankie Swords, National Medical Director for NHS England and the Department of Health and Social Care, and Sarah Barley-McMullen, strategic lived experience partner for NHS England and Chair of Long Covid SOS. They explore why quality must become the NHS’s guiding principle, encompassing safe and clinically effective care as well as a positive patient experience. The conversation considers the role of leadership and organisational culture, the use of meaningful data and shared metrics, reducing unwarranted variation, and making it easier for people throughout the health and care system to do the right thing. Sarah brings a vital lived-experience perspective, arguing that quality cannot be understood through performance data alone. It can be felt in whether care is joined up, whether patients are heard and involved in decisions, and whether their experience gives them the confidence to seek help and remain engaged in their care. Related reading on the hub: Patient Safety Learning’s initial response to the Quality strategy for NHS-funded care in England
  21. News Article
    Greater “air cover” from NHS England and “assurance” that commissioning leaders will not suffer from making difficult decisions has been demanded by integrated care boards. System chiefs have told NHSE they need greater support for potentially unpopular decisions on redesigning services, and have also called for more relaxed performance targets and financial flexibility in order to innovate. ICBs have responded to a letter from NHSE chief executive Sir Jim Mackey sent earlier this year, which asked commissioners what the centre could do to “help accelerate the pace of change locally, including getting out of the way where necessary”. Humber and North Yorkshire ICB has asked for regional and national “air cover for difficult system decisions” - such as when decommissioning, scaling back or consolidating services. Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire, and Gloucestershire ICB meanwhile called for “the psychological safety and assurance needed” from the centre “to test new contractual and payment mechanisms locally”. Norfolk and Suffolk wanted greater support for system leaders to “take calculated risks in redesigning services, particularly around financial flows”. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 20 July 2026
  22. Content Article
    This is a poem written and read by Elaine Freeman, Patient Safety Partner (PSP) at Lincolnshire Community and Hospitals NHS Group. Elaine and her PSP colleagues shared their poems with the Group Chief Governance Officer, her deputy, and the new Chair of the Group, inviting reflection on the importance of patient-centred care. The PSPs chose poetry as a powerful and personal way to express their experiences, insights, hopes, and concerns, and to highlight the human story behind the numbers. Two other poems they shared are included at the end.  The video has been created by Patient Safety Learning.  The human Behind the Digit I am the person behind the number, The face behind the case, The story in the spreadsheet, A name you can’t erase. I’m more than just a metric, A target or a trend, I’m a mother, father, sister, A neighbour and a friend. When you look at columns, And data on the screen, Remember there’s a heartbeat, And a life that’s lived between. So, as you make your choices, And the digits start to climb, Don’t lose the human spirit, In the pressure of the time. Other poems by the Patient Safety Partners Can you hear me? By Ruth Krampf Can you hear me? You told us that my partner needed to come in for some tests. You told us that my partner’s future was grim. My partner was frightened. Can You Hear Me? We came to you. I told you my concerns about my partner. I told you about my partner’s condition. Can You HEAR Me? You put my partner on Nil by Mouth. Nobody told me. Doctor take your eyes away from your tablet and look at us. Listen to us! CAN You HEAR Me? My partner is not a metric, they are confused. My partner is not a tick box, they are anxious. My partner wants to come home. CAN YOU HEAR Me? My partner is not just another statistic to put a tick against. My partner is a spouse, parent, sibling and friend. My partner is loved. CAN YOU HEAR ME? The Human Behind the Digit (2) By Elaine Freeman The screen is filled with rows of green, A grid of targets, met and signed. But in the spaces in between, What of the souls we’ve left behind? A metric is a frozen thing, A snapshot of a process done, But safety is the life we bring To every daughter, father, son. A 'tick' is not a healing hand; A 'box' is not a life restored. We need a Board to understand The truths that live beyond the board. For outcomes are not found in ink, Or graphs that track a steady line, But in the time we stop to think: “Is this a person, or a sign?” So let the data find its place, But let the patient lead the way. Put back the name, the story, the face, Into the words we choose to say. True success is not a score, Or how we’ve played the system’s part; It’s when we open up the door And lead with data—and with heart.
  23. Content Article
    In this Nursing Times, Elaine Maxwell article argues that “normalisation of deviance” — the gradual drift away from safe, established clinical practices — is not a problem of poor values or individual misconduct but a predictable consequence of health systems under severe strain. Drawing on recent inquiries, including Muckamore Abbey Hospital and Nottingham maternity services, she discusses how chronic understaffing, rising patient acuity, inadequate oversight, and lack of feedback force staff into workarounds that eventually become routine, even when harmful.
  24. Content Article
    This guidance offers a support framework with actionable steps for staff affected by physical violence and psychological trauma within NHS settings. This framework covers the post incident support of staff following: physical violence verbal abuse online/digital abuse sexual assault sexual harassment. This framework is focused on the post-incident support response for staff following violence and abuse in the course of their work. It is not intended to replace local safeguarding, HR, disciplinary, legal, or clinical incident management procedures. Organisations should apply this framework alongside their existing policies and pathways, using professional judgement where incidents overlap..
  25. Event
    Training to support the development of expertise involving patients, families, carers and staff when things go wrong, in line with NHS guidance, based upon national and internationally recognised good practice. To include the duty of candour and ‘being open’ principles. This course covers the end-to-end systems-based patient safety incident response based upon the new NHS PSIRF and includes: Duty of candour regulations Being open and apologising when things go wrong Challenges/complexities associated with cases where there is more than one investigation Effective communication, including dealing with conflict and difficult conversations Effective involvement of those affected by a patient safety incident throughout the incident response process to ensure a thorough and richer investigation Sharing findings Signposting and support: including loss, trauma and stress WHO SHOULD ATTEND Lead investigators conducting patient safety incident investigations Executive and service lead for duty of candour Executive and service lead for patient safety Executive and service lead for the supporting response to patient safety incidents Investigators supporting patient safety incident investigations Register hub members receive a 20% discount. Email [email protected] for discount code.
  26. Event
    The Healthcare Governance Academy, PSIRF training trusted by more than 4,000 healthcare professionals. Delivered by a patient safety consultant that developed PSIRF tools. This training will support the development of expert understanding and oversight of systems based patient safety incident response throughout the healthcare system - in line with NHS guidance, based upon national and internationally recognised good practice. This course covers the end-to-end systems-based patient safety incident response based upon the new NHS PSIRF and includes: PSIRF and associated documents (PSIRP, PSII standards) oversight framework effective oversight and supporting processes related to incident response maintaining an open, transparent, and improvement focused culture importance of communication and involvement of those affected (preventing further harm) commissioning and planning of patient safety incident investigations complex investigations spanning different organisational, care setting, and stakeholder boundaries WHO SHOULD ATTEND Executives, commissioning, & service managers supporting service lead investigator roles. The following only after attending the 2-day systems approach to patient safety incident response: All Executive, Commissioner and Service Leads for investigation; All Lead investigators conducting patient safety incident investigations investigators conducting. Register hub members receive a 20% discount. Email [email protected] for discount code.
  27. Event
    The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) arguably represents the most significant change to investigating and managing patient safety incidents in the history of the NHS. To embed PSIRF effectively within organisations, healthcare teams need to understand and utilise a range of new techniques and disciplines. Clinical audit is an established quality improvement methodology that is often overlooked by patient safety teams, but will play an increasingly important role in ensuring that PSIRF fully delivers its stated objectives. CQC reports often highlight the importance of clinical audit as a measurement and assurance tool that can raise red flags if used appropriately. Indeed, both the Ockenden and Kirkup reports highlighted the importance of clinical audit in identifying and quantifying substandard care. While SEIPS, After Action Reviews, more in-depth interviewing techniques, etc. are all receiving much fanfare in relation to PSIRF, the importance of clinical audit needs to be better understood. This short course will explain how organisations who use clinical audit effectively will increase patient safety and better understand why incidents take place. We will look at the key role of audit in understanding work as imagined and works as done and show why national audits can assist with creating patient safety plans. Change analysis and the effective implementation of safety actions are keys to PSIRF delivery and clinical audit will assist in the delivery of both. We will also demonstrate the important, but often under-appreciated role, clinical audit staff will have in the successful delivery of PSIRF. Key learning outcomes: Why clinical audit is an integral element of PSIRF. Why clinical audit staff have a vital role to play in PSIRF. How clinical audit data can help raise red flags and spot risks. Using clinical audit to better understand your incidents. Ensuring your safety actions are working. Using audit to assess your patient safety incident investigations. Register hub members receive a 20% discount. Email [email protected] for discount code.
  28. Event
    Any staff with responsibility for implementing the duty of candour and/or PSIRF and those responsible for quality; safety; clinical governance; safety investigations; complaints; CQC compliance; or patient experience/ involvement would benefit from attending this one-day training. The course will provide participants with an in-depth knowledge and understanding of how to not only comply with the duty of candour and the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF), but to do so in an emotionally intelligent way, with empathy and compassion for all involved. Practical guidance on complying with the regulations and guidance The “grey areas” and what people most often get wrong Using emotional intelligence to understand the difficult emotions experienced by patients/those closest to them and staff following patient safety incidents What empathy and compassion mean in practice Handling difficult and emotive conversations well Making a meaningful apology How Duty of Candour and PSIRF work alongside other policies and procedures including complaints; litigation; Martha’s Rule and the soon to be introduced “Hillsborough Law” How the new “Harmed Patient Pathway” can help you get it right 7 How to ensure communication moves beyond compliance and frameworks but remains emotionally intelligent and personal Register hub members receive 20% discount. Email [email protected] for discount code.
  1. Load more activity
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.