Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Legal issue'.
Found 572 results
-
EventuntilWhen things go wrong - doctors in the dock series provides a unique opportunity to hear real patients discuss their experience of medical errors. Well-known witnesses of clinical errors will talk about their first-hand experiences, what happened, how they and their family had to deal with them, and how they have dealt with the aftermath in the most constructive way possible. Gain more experience and insight about the best way to deal with clinical errors as professionals, and from a patient perspective, and convert them into an opportunity for improvement for all involved, even leading to very successful careers. Register
-
EventWhether your role is in the NHS or in private healthcare, it is vitally important to take consent for any intervention safely. This webinar brings together clinical and legal perspectives, advising healthcare professionals of all levels how to take consent safely to avoid litigation and improve patient safety. Receive guidance from NHS Consultant, Michael Kelly, who has provided expert witness evidence at Court, combined with input from Andrew Bershadski, a highly experienced Barrister who has proceeded to Trial and won for the medical profession on a number of separate informed consent cases. Ed Glasgow, a Partner specialising in Healthcare Law, will Chair the event, which it is hoped will provide valuable practical insight.
-
EventuntilThe Westminster Health Forum is a division of Westminster Forum Projects, an impartial and cross-party organisation which has no policy agenda of its own. Forums operated by Westminster Forum Projects enjoy considerable support from within Parliament and Government. The agenda: The impact of investigations in the NHS and the priorities of the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch Progress of improving patient safety in the NHS Maintaining patient safety during COVID-19 - rapid learning to respond to the virus, continuity of care, and adapting care delivery practices Delivering safe care in the NHS - preventing errors, utilising data and technology, supporting the workforce, and promoting high quality leadership Learning from the voice of parents and families How to improve patient safety by reducing unwarranted variation and learning from clinical negligence claims The role of technology in reducing errors, enhancing care, and ensuring safety in remote healthcare and telemedicine Taking forward the National Patient Safety Syllabus and supporting the workforce to deliver care safely during the presence of COVID-19 Learning from harm, reducing the cost of litigation in the NHS, and the impact of COVID-19 Assessing findings from the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review The role of the regulator in reducing avoidable harm and informing future practice Register
-
EventuntilBased on the participant feedback and interest in the 'Reimagining Healing after Harm: the Potential for Restorative Practices' webinar, Patients for Patient Safety Canada is pleased to offer this follow up session. Restorative practices involve inclusive democratic dialogue between all those affected by healthcare harm. They are guided by concern to address harms, meet needs, restore trust, and promote repair or healing for all involved. This webinar will further explore New Zealand's approach to healing after healthcare harm from surgical mesh: What was the impetus for a restorative approach? What inspired the choice of a relationship-centric and reconciliatory model? How did restorative practices support the co-design process between consumer advocates and Ministry of Health representatives? How do restorative approaches support New Zealand's commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi- The treaty that determines the partnership between the Crown and indigenous peoples? It will follow with a participant discussion about what this means for Canada. Further information and registration
-
Event
In Conversation Live with David Sellu
Patient Safety Learning posted an event in Community Calendar
David Sellu FRCS, distinguished Consultant Colorectal Surgeon, will be joining RSM President Professor Roger Kirby for an extraordinary discussion about his unfair trial, his imprisonment, and his subsequently quashed conviction for Gross Negligence Manslaughter. He will be talking about his highly acclaimed and candid book, Did He Save Lives? A Surgeon's Story, patient safety and the practice of defensive medicine, as well as what the future now looks like for him. In February 2010, David operated on a patient and despite his efforts, the patient died two days later. There followed a sequence of extraordinary events that led to David being convicted of Gross Negligence Manslaughter. He served 15 months in prison and eventually released on licence. His licence to practise medicine was suspended, his career cut short. It was later discovered that David's trial was unfair, and with Dr Jenny Vaughan leading the campaign along with friends, family and colleagues, David won the appeal against his conviction and is now a free man. The shock waves caused by David’s conviction has led more medical professionals to practise defensive medicine. This could have a huge impact on patient care in the future as our population ages and their health needs become more complex. Register -
Event
Inquests, indemnity and incidents in primary care
Clive Flashman posted an event in Community Calendar
untilThis Royal Society of Medicine meeting will focus on some of the key medico-legal issues that impact GPs, primary care and patient safety, with a specific emphasis on inquests, clinical negligence and incidents. This comprehensive programme will review and explore the latest legal and regulatory developments from national leaders in each of these fields. Delegates will gain an understanding of: The role of coroners and inquests, what to expect and what GPs and those working in primary care need to do to prepare and actively learn from deaths. The role of Medical Examiners and how they will impact on primary care. The support, including education and training, available to GPs in dealing with medico-legal issues and how to access practical support (e.g. via the Medical Defence Organisations) when necessary. The role of NHS Resolution and the Clinical Negligence Scheme for GPs (CNSGP) and their impact upon GPs and patient safety. Developments in learning from incidents in primary care, including feedback from the CQC regarding best practice and areas for improvement. Book here -
Content ArticleTwo decades ago, the Institute of Medicine published To Err Is Human, a landmark report that brought attention to medical error and became a catalyst for the patient safety movement. Around the 10-year anniversary of the report, a number of articles and studies were published that examined the impact of this movement. Nearly all concluded that it was too early to assess whether significant change had taken place. Now, new data indicates efforts after the 20-year anniversary mark have not progressed as expected. It raises vital questions and renewed areas of focus for the healthcare industry. In this article, Coverys, a provider of medical professional liability insurance, looks at the date and the key claim trends.
-
Content ArticleOn the same day that the nation went into a second lockdown, the Government published revised guidance on Visiting Arrangements for Care Homes. Whereas previous versions of this guidance had adopted a more neutral approach, the steer from the Government is now clear; the expectation is for care homes to be facilitating visits wherever possible. This Bevan Brittan article looks at what the law says, what the new guidance says and what care homes should be doing.
-
Content ArticleThe Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Safeguarding Adults Review into The Morleigh Group has found elderly people in care homes in Cornwall were abused and neglected while failings led to reports of concerns not being investigated. The Morleigh Group operated seven homes in Cornwall and has since shut down. The review was completed in April 2019 but has only just been made public - Rob Rotchell, Cornwall Council Cabinet member for adult social care said that this was due to the number of agencies being involved.
-
Content ArticleDr Kathryn Leask outlines steps GPs can take to try and avoid patients coming to harm as a result of delayed referrals and provides advice on dealing with patient complaints on this issue. There are some steps GPs can take to try to avoid patients coming to harm while putting themselves in the best position to address the potential medico-legal ramifications. In their guidance on Delegation and referral the GMC says that you are not accountable for the actions or omissions of colleagues to whom you make referrals. However, you are accountable for your decisions to transfer care and the steps you have taken to make sure that patient safety is not compromised. If you are aware that there are delays for a particular service and your patient is likely to be affected by this, you should make this clear to them and manage their expectations from the outset. In this GP Online article, Kathryn gives practical tips for GPs and shares a case example.
- Posted
- 1 comment
-
1
-
- (and 4 more)
-
Content ArticleOn the 12 October 2020, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) announced the launch of a review into the imposition of blanket ‘do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation’ (DNACPR) notices for patients in care homes, primary care and hospitals. This follows revelations earlier in the year that potentially thousands of patients were being placed in care homes with blanket ‘do not attempt resuscitation’ (DNAR) notices in place. This has led to widespread public criticism. This article explores whether a DNACPR notice is valid without the consultation of family members or other representatives of a patient receiving care and, if not, what should be done?
-
Content Article
APIL: Our strategic plan 2020-23 and beyond
Patient Safety Learning posted an article in Legal matters
The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) has been fighting for the rights of injured people for almost 30 years. A not-for-profit campaign organisation, APIL’s 3,200 member lawyers (mainly solicitors, barristers and legal executives) are dedicated to protecting and enhancing access to justice, improving the services provided for victims of personal injury, and campaigning to change the law wherever appropriate. Here is their strategic plan for the next 3 years. In creating this plan, APiL have tried to focus on the big challenges facing people injured due to the negligence of others as they try to rebuild their lives. -
Content ArticlePresentation from Dr Andrew Hider, Clinical Director, Consultant Clinical and Forensic Psychologist, Ludlow Street Healthcare, on mental health during the pandemic.
-
Content ArticlePresentation from Dr Dan Dalton, Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist and National Specialty Advisor for Mental Health, on the legal complexity regarding the use of the Mental Health Act for ensuring compliance with infection control measures.
-
Content ArticleThe No Fault Compensation Review Group were asked by the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Wellbeing to consider the potential benefits for patients in Scotland of a no fault compensation scheme for injuries resulting from medical treatment, and whether such a scheme should be introduced alongside the existing clinical negligence arrangements. This report sets out the approach they adopted together with their findings, conclusions and recommendations which help and inform consideration of what is required to ensure that the compensation scheme in operation in Scotland meets the needs of those involved.
-
Content Article
We need to talk about Francis ....
PatientSafetyLearning Team posted an article in Inquiries
In this article, Valerie Iles, argues that we should hesitate before deciding to implement the recommendations of the Francis Inquiry. Instead, she states that we should consider whether Francis and his Inquiry are part of the system, part of the mindset, that is the problem. -
Content ArticleIn this chapter, Wilkinson and Savulescu describe the background to the Charlie Gard case and how it played out over the first half of 2017. They will look at how decisions about medical treatment are normally made and the role of the court in decisions. They outline some of the important ethical questions raised by the Gard case.
-
Content ArticleOn 8 June 2017, the Supreme Court in the United Kingdom rejected a legal appeal in the high-profile case of Charlie Gard, a British infant with a severe genetic disorder whose parents had disagreed with medical professionals and were requesting treatment that the doctors believed was futile. The case was the latest in a series of UK legal cases where courts have authorised withdrawal of treatment against the wishes of parents. In such disputes, British judges have, with rare exception, sided with health professionals. In contrast, in North America when disputes have reached the court, the courts have invariably sided in favour of life-sustaining medical treatment requested by a loving family. Paris et al. discuss the case of Charlie Gard.
-
Content ArticleOn 24 July 2017, the long-running, deeply tragic and emotionally fraught case of Charlie Gard reached its sad conclusion. Following further medical assessment of the infant, Charlie’s parents and doctors finally reached agreement that continuing medical treatment was not in Charlie’s best interests. Life support was subsequently withdrawn and Charlie died on 28 July 2017. This paper from Dominic Wilkinson and Julian Savulescu summarises the case and looks at the key factual and ethical questions arising from the Charlie Gard case, and parents’ role in decision-making for children.
-
Content ArticleThe Care Quality Commission (CQC) has published the second report of Professor Glynis Murphy’s independent review of its regulation of Whorlton Hall between 2015 and 2019. CQC commissioned Professor Murphy to conduct an independent review to look at whether the abuse of patients at Whorlton Hall could have been recognised earlier by the regulatory process and to make recommendations for how CQC can improve its regulation of similar services in the future. In addition, CQC asked Professor Murphy to conduct a review of international research evidence to look at how abuse is detected within services for adults with a learning disability and autistic people and how such detection can be improved. The first report of Professor Murphy’s review made a number of recommendations for CQC to strengthen its inspection and regulatory approach for mental health, learning disability and/or autism services. This second report outlines the progress that CQC has made to implement the recommendations. This includes publication of the final report of its review of restraint, seclusion and segregation; work on closed cultures and the development of a tool for rating support plans.
-
Content ArticleIn the summer of 2019, following a televised Panorama programme showing abusive care of people with learning disabilities and/or autism in Whorlton Hall (an independent hospital in the north of England), the Care Quality Commission (CQC) requested an independent review of its inspections of Whorlton Hall. Professor Glynis Murphy was appointed to conduct the review.
-
Content Article
NHS Resolution: Manual handling (19 October 2020)
Patient Safety Learning posted an article in Patient management
From 1 April 2009 to 31 March 2019, NHS Resolution was notifed of 4,733 claims relating to manual handling. NHS Resolution has produced a 'Did you know' guide on manual handling. -
Content ArticleThis video supports the launch of our thematic review that presents a detailed analysis of claims made after an individual has attempted to take their life. Claims relating to completed suicide and attempted suicide are reviewed, regardless of whether the claim resulted in financial compensation. It identifies common problems with care and provides recommendations for improvement to support service delivery.
-
Content ArticleNHS Resolution are raising awareness of the human and financial cost of assault claims. Not all assaults result in a claim for compensation but there is a duty to report all assaults. Assault claims result in life changing physical and psychological effects on the individual and in the most tragic cases a loss of life, impacting families and carers. Following an assault, staff are more inclined to leave the NHS and employers can struggle to attract and retain talent to work in their organisation
-
Content ArticleIn this video, Ian Long gives some legal context on the issue of consent.
