Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Investigation'.
Found 1,559 results
-
Content ArticleThis dissertation from Ivan Pupulidy, Tilburg University, introduces a network of practices that transformed the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service accident investigation. This dissertation uses case studies to show the interweaving of organisational and individual journeys, each of which began with the strength to inquire and to challenge assumptions. The case studies show how constructed realities, including my own, were challenged through inquiry and how four practices emerged that supported sense making at both the field and organisational leadership levels of the organisation.
-
Content ArticleThis report by the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) has been published as part of a local pilot, which has been launched to evaluate HSIB’s ability to carry out effective investigations occurring between specific hospitals and trusts. After an evaluation, it will be decided whether this model can be implemented more widely by HSIB. This investigation reviewed the case of a woman who was taken to an emergency department by ambulance in April 2021, following a 999 call from her Granddaughter to the emergency operations centre. The emergency operations centre used the wrong NHS number for the patient, which was assigned to her for the duration of her stay in hospital and led to her being offered incorrect medication.
-
Content ArticleIn this blog Patient Safety Learning provides an overview of the key points included in its response to the call for evidence for the Health and Social Care Select Committee Inquiry examining the case for reform of NHS litigation.
-
Content ArticleTwo years ago, a patient safety incident at North Bristol Trust led to the introduction of Swarm – a step change in how the trust responds to safety incidents. Swarm is a form of safety incident huddle that takes place as close as possible in time and place to the incident, allows blame-free investigation and leads to prompt action. This article describes how Swarm works, its advantages over root cause analysis, and how it is being embedded in the safety culture of North Bristol Trust.
-
Content ArticleThe purpose of this investigation by the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) is to help improve patient safety in relation to the management of patients with COVID-19 being treated with non-invasive respiratory support, for example continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), in non-critical care settings. The HSIB investigation reviewed the experience of Terry, who was admitted to hospital with symptoms of COVID-19 and required support with is breathing using CPAP. On the second day after his admission to hospital, Terry was found on the floor next to his bed, having called for assistance. Terry’s CPAP tubing had become disconnected from his mask, meaning that Terry’s breathing was not supported. Staff attempted to resuscitate Terry, however they were unsuccessful, and he died.
-
Content ArticleThis report was triggered by the Coroner’s report into the death of Evan Nathan Smith in North Middlesex hospital. Evan was a young man with his whole life in front of him. The mistakes made in his treatment leading to his early and avoidable death brought into sharp focus the lack of understanding of sickle cell, the battles patients have to go through to get proper treatment and the terrible consequences which can come about as a result. Following the publication of the Coroner’s report, the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia held three evidence sessions, hearing from patients, clinicians and politicians. This report is a result of that evidence. The findings in this report reveal a pattern of many years of sub-standard care, stigmatisation and lack of prioritisation which have resulted in sickle cell patients losing trust in the healthcare system that is there to help them, feeling scared to access hospitals, expecting poor treatment from some of those who are supposed to care for them and fearing that it is only a matter of time until they encounter serious care failings.
-
Content Article
Thought piece on the Ockenden Report by Susan Stanford
Patient Safety Learning posted an article in Maternity
People with an interest in patient safety read the interim Ockenden report with despair. It was immediately and starkly apparent that it repeated many of the common themes which have emerged in other patient safety investigations. Many of the recommendations in the Ockenden report were already covered by national guidance, Susan Stanford asks why the guidance wasn’t followed and whether it might not be being followed elsewhere. -
Content ArticlePatient safety incidents (PSIs) are common and can lead to fatal outcomes. Effective investigation of PSIs is essential to optimise learning and take action to prevent further incidents occurring. The Yorkshire Contributory Factors Framework is a tool which has an evidence base for optimising learning and addressing causes of patient safety incidents by helping clinicians, risk managers and patient safety officers identify contributory factors of PSIs. Incidents that occur in a hospital setting have been well studied and all contributory factors have been mapped. Based on this research, a team of practicing clinicians with human factors experts has adapted the evidence to a pragmatic 2 page framework. The document suggests questions that you might want to ask of those involved in the incident. The underlying aim of this tool is not to ignore individual accountability for unsafe care, but to try to develop a more sophisticated understanding of the factors that cause incidents.
-
Content Article
Diagnostic Errors: Technical Series on Safer Primary Care (2016)
Patient-Safety-Learning posted an article in WHO
This document from the World Health Organization raises awareness about strategies that could reduce diagnostic errors in primary care. It highlights the importance of examining diagnostic errors, identifies the most common types of diagnostic error in primary care and describes potential solutions. -
Content ArticleThis session at HSIB's second annual Patient Safety Investigation Conference explored the national investigation process from referral of incidents to the publication of the report. The session will also provided detail of how we involve patients, families and service users during the investigation process. Download the session View the video
-
Content Article
Transvaginal mesh timeline (7 December 2017)
Patient-Safety-Learning posted an article in Women's health
This blog sets out a timeline of the major landmarks for transvaginal surgical mesh since its first approval in 1996. -
Content ArticleA new report from two House of Commons committees highlights the UK’s failed pandemic response. Martin McKee, professor of European Public Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, unpicks the findings.
-
Content ArticleThese tools and worksheets have been produced by NHS England to assist staff in conducting patient safety incident investigations. NHS England stresses that patient safety investigation is an important and complex task and should only be undertaken by those who have attended training and gained skills and experience from specialists in the field.
-
Content ArticleThis guidance was updated on the 30 June 2022 to clarify how healthcare professionals should apply the term “unexpected or unintended” to decide if something qualifies as a notifiable safety event or not. Further detail is included below and you can find the full update here.
-
Content ArticleThis template has been published to guide local PSIRP early adopter organisations in prioritising investigation quality over quantity. NHS providers should follow this template when developing their local patient safety incident response plan.
-
Content ArticleThe Serious Incident framework describes the process and procedures to help ensure serious incidents are identified correctly, investigated thoroughly and, most importantly, learned from to prevent the likelihood of similar incidents happening again. This framework explains the responsibilities involved when dealing with serious incidents and includes actions staff are required to take, and the tools available. It is designed to inform staff providing and commissioning NHS funded services in England who may be involved in identifying, investigating or managing a serious incident. It is relevant to all NHS-funded care in the primary, community, secondary and tertiary sectors, including private sector organisations providing NHS-funded services. At some point in 2022, the Serious Incident framework will be replaced by the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework
-
Content ArticleThis is the first in a series of thematic reports which will be published by the Independent Maternity Services Oversight Panel in the coming year. The purpose of the report is to summarise the learning which is emerging from the ongoing programme of independent clinical reviews of the maternity and neonatal care previously provided by the former Cwm Taf University Health Board. This particular report summarises the key themes and issues which emerged from the clinical review of 28 individual episodes of care1 which were provided by the Health Board between 01 January 2016 and 30 September 20182. It focuses on the care of mothers who needed unplanned emergency treatment during childbirth, including some who required admission to an Intensive Care Unit.
-
Content Article
This is the second in a series of thematic reports to be published by the Independent Maternity Services Oversight Panel about their ongoing programme of independent clinical reviews of the maternity and neonatal care provided by the former Cwm Taf University Health Board. This report focuses on the care of mothers and their babies who were stillborn. It summarises the key themes and issues which emerged from the clinical review of 63 individual episodes of care which were provided by the Health Board between 01 January 2016 and 30 September 2018. -
Content ArticleThis is the Government’s formal response to the recommendations made by the Health and Social Care Committee in its report, ‘The Safety of Maternity Services in England’. The Committee’s inquiry examined evidence relating to the safety of maternity services. It builds upon current investigations following incidents at East Kent Hospitals University Trust and Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust, as well as the inquiry into the University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Trust. The inquiry also considered whether the clinical negligence and litigation processes need to be changed to improve the safety of maternity services and explored the impact of blame culture on learning from incidents.
-
Content ArticleAn examination of how humans interact with their environments and each other led a team at Spectrum Health Helen DeVos Children’s Hospital in Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA, to question one of its long-standing medication safety practices and change how they work.
-
Content ArticleExternal clinical harm reviews aim to give assurance to patients, patient groups, commissioners and the public as to whether any patients have been harmed as a result of an incident, as well as to avoid future harm to patients. This handbook by Dr Henrietta Hughes, NHS Medical Director for London North, Central and East, outlines an approach to conducting clinical external harm reviews. It identifies the factors which make external clinical harm panels successful and provides example agendas and terms of reference for the process.
-
Content ArticlePrisons and Probation Ombudsman Sue McAllister has published the independent investigation into the death of a baby (Baby A) at HMP Bronzefield on 27 September 2019. The investigation identified a considerable number of issues and concerns about the care and management of Ms A, the baby’s mother. Sue makes a significant number of recommendations to improve maternity services in Bronzefield. There is wider learning for the whole of the women’s prison estate from the death of Baby A, and the Prison Service must take this opportunity to improve the outcomes for pregnant prisoners so that this tragic event is not repeated.
-
Content ArticleOn 2 September 2006, all 14 crew of a UK Royal Air Force (RAF) ‘spy plane’ Nimrod XV230 were lost following a catastrophic mid-air fire. The aircraft was on a routine mission when a leak of aviation fuel, shortly after air-to-air refuelling, came into contact with a source of ignition. The fire was not accessible, not able to be remotely suppressed, and the incident was not survivable. ‘The Nimrod Review’, led by The Hon. Mr Justice Haddon-Cave, is a model investigation, and should be required reading for executives and leaders in all industries. The Review takes the aircraft fire as its starting point, but casts its net far and wide through the organisation, as well as considering relevant events in other industries. This Nimrod XV230 tragedy is so rich in lessons, Martin Anderson, Chartered Human Factors Professional, shares on his website a series of articles about the Nimrod XV230.
-
Content Article
Why investigate? Part 11: We have a situation
Graham Edgar posted an article in Why investigate? Blog series
In the latest blog in the 'Why investigate' blog series, Professor Graham Edgar discusses situational awareness. -
Content ArticleAround £240m of taxpayers’ money has been spent on government inquiries since 2005, but evidence that recommendations from these high profile investigations have been adopted is lacking, the UK public spending watchdog has concluded. The report by the National Audit Office into government funded inquiries, including those on NHS matters, describes uncertainty and variation in the relative costs of inquiries, the effects they had, and how they were carried out.1 In all, the watchdog found that the government spent at least £239m on the 26 inquiries that have concluded since 2005 and that they lasted on average 40 months
