Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Redress'.
Found 49 results
-
News Article
Judge says parents and children should receive infected blood payments
Patient-Safety-Learning posted a news article in News
The parents and children of victims of the contaminated blood scandal should receive government compensation, a judge has said. The chairman of the infected blood public inquiry, Sir Brian Langstaff, said it was time to "recognise deaths which have so far gone unrecognised". More than 3,000 people died after contracting HIV or hepatitis C via NHS treatments in the 1970s and 80s. The government must now respond to the recommendations. In August 2022, the government agreed to make the first interim compensation payments of £100,000 each to about 4,000 surviving victims, and bereaved widows. Sir Brian said, "It is a fact that around 380 children with bleeding disorders were infected with HIV. Some of them died in childhood. But their parents have never received compensation. Children who were orphaned as a result of infections transmitted by blood transfusions and blood products have never had their losses recognised. It's time to put that right." Read full story Source: BBC News -
News Article
Infighting delays valproate compensation
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Source: The Times. 5 March Shared on Twitter @ShaunLintern -
Content Article
A bitter pill: Primodos (Sky News, 3 January 2023)
Patient-Safety-Learning posted an article in Medication
This Sky News investigation looks at one of the pharmaceutical industry's biggest scandals—the hormone pregnancy test Primodos which was prescribed to pregnant mothers in the UK between 1958 and 1978. Primodos was found to lead to birth defects, miscarriages and stillbirth, and regulatory failings led to avoidable harm to thousands of babies. -
Content ArticleThe Health and Social Care Select Committee have published a new report reviewing the progress that the UK Government has made in implementing the recommendations of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review, sometimes referred to as the Cumberlege Review. This blog sets out Patient Safety Learning’s reflections on this report.
-
Content ArticleThis Health and Social Care Select Committee report reviews the progress that the UK Government has made in implementing the recommendations of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review, sometimes referred to as the Cumberlege Review. You can read Patient Safety Learning’s reflections on this report here.
-
Content Article
In this opinion piece, Kath Sansom, founder of campaign group Sling the Mesh, looks at flaws in the Government’s approach to women harmed by pelvic mesh surgery receiving financial redress. She highlights the unsuccessful case of Sarah*, who attempted to bring a clinical negligence case after suffering multiple complications as a result of pelvic mesh, to demonstrate that the national Redress Agency recommended by the Cumberlege Review is still very necessary. -
News Article
No timetable for infected blood victims' compensation
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
There is a "moral case" for compensation to be paid to people affected by the contaminated blood scandal, the government has said. But Paymaster General Jeremy Quin told MPs he could not commit to a timetable. In August, the government announced that 4,000 UK victims would receive interim payments of £100,000. Tens of thousands of people contracted HIV or hepatitis C in the 1970s and 80s after being given infected blood. In September, modelling by a group of academics commissioned by the public inquiry estimated that 26,800 people were infected after being given contaminated transfusions between 1970 and 1991. The study calculated that 1,820 of those died as a result, but that the number could be as high as 3,320. The inquiry, chaired by retired High Court judge Sir Brian Langstaff, began taking evidence in 2018. The interim compensation announcement in August came after Sir Brian argued there was a compelling case to make payments quickly - saying victims were on borrowed time because of their failing health. Payments have been made to those whose health is failing after developing hepatitis C and HIV, and partners of people who have died. But families have complained that many people affected, such as bereaved parents, missed out. Read full story Source: BBC News, 15 December 2022 -
Content ArticleIn this editorial. Peter Walsh reflects on 20 years as Chief Executive of Action against Medical Accidents (AVMA) as he retires from the role. AvMA also marks its 40th anniversary this year, and Peter examines the organisation's unique role in focusing on patient safety and justice for patients. He highlights that healthcare systems and patient safety practice still have a long way to go in offering fairness and support to families affected by avoidable harm in healthcare, and argues that focusing on patients and their families must be a top priority when looking at system safety. He highlights the vital role that AvMA has played in bringing Duty of Candour into law in the countries of the UK, and argues that legal action is an important right that must be retained for patients and families who have come to harm as a result of medical error. He also talks about AvMA's recent development of a Harmed Care Pathway in collaboration with the Harmed Patients Alliance, which outlines the specific set of needs that should form part of a package of care for harmed patients and families.
-
Content ArticleThe Communication, Apology and Resolution model (CARe) offers healthcare organisations a detailed process for responding to unanticipated adverse outcomes, which includes proactively communicating with patients and families, examining and explaining what happened, avoiding recurrences by improving systems of care and, where appropriate, apologising and offering financial compensation. The model recognises that clinicians and staff will need peer support and training to effectively communicate with patients and families. In June 2022, advocates of the CARe model held an annual forum to highlight the successes of CARe programs in Massachusetts and to look at challenges health care providers face in doing this work consistently across their organisations. This article by the Betsy Lehman Center highlights video recordings shared at the forum including: A family member testimonial by Jane Bugbee, whose healthy daughter, Lindsay, died of Strep A and sepsis shortly after giving birth to her third child in July 2018 A simulation of a resolution conversation with a family A simulation of a conversation with provider after an adverse event.
-
Content ArticleThis is an Early Day Motion tabled in the House of Commons on 5 September 2022, which calls on the Government to implement the recommendations of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review in full, in particular recommendation 4 of the report calling for the establishment of separate schemes to meet the costs of additional care and support to those who have suffered avoidable harm.
-
Content ArticleFor the first time since the 1990s, the Surgeons’ Hall Museums in Edinburgh has displayed a new pathology specimen—a transvaginal tape removed in April 2022 from a woman suffering complications of vaginal tape (or mesh) surgery performed in 2006. In this blog Louise Wilkie, the museums' Curator, explains how the device came to be displayed, the history of vaginal tape surgery and the controversy surrounding its introduction and regulation. She also highlights concerns about the subsequent treatment of women who experienced life-changing complications as a result of the procedure.
-
News ArticleA scheme handing payments to those affected by the contaminated blood scandal will be announced this week, as ministers scramble to help those harmed by the “historic wrong”. Whitehall sources confirmed that a programme handing interim payments will be confirmed in the coming days, once officials have ironed out issues to ensure that victims are not taxed on the payments or have their benefits affected by them. It is thought that ministers accept recent recommendations that infected people and bereaved partners should get “payments of no less than £100,000”. More than 4,000 people are in line for the payment. Kit Malthouse, the cabinet office minister, has been prioritising the scheme in the last week to ensure payments are made as soon as possible. “The infected blood scandal was a tragedy for everyone involved, and the prime minister strongly believes that all those who suffered so terribly as a result of this injustice should receive compensation as quickly as possible,” said a No 10 source. “He has tasked ministers with resolving this issue so that interim payments can be made to all those infected as soon as possible, and we will set out the full details later this week.” Read full story Source: The Guardian, 6 August 2022
-
Content Article
Two years after Baroness Cumberlege shared her damning report, 'First Do No Harm', which highlighted serious failures in response to reports about harmful side effects from medicines and medical devices, too many mesh injured women still continue to be let down by the healthcare system. Women who have been harmed by pelvic mesh surgery have shared a series of appalling accounts of how they have been treated by their doctors while desperately seeking help for their injuries and complications. In this blog, we examine how these comments reveal an underlying misogyny held by many doctors, and a failure to take women’s concerns seriously. -
Content ArticleMesh complications are rare and in most cases relatively minor. However, in a small number of cases they can be serious. These include mesh erosion/extrusion (when the mesh pokes through the vaginal wall or cuts through internal tissue), vaginal scarring, fistula formation, painful sex, bladder infection or perforation (piercing), bowel and nerve trauma and pelvic, back and leg pains. Some of these complications may occur years after surgery and can be difficult to treat. Serious complications are rare, given the tens of thousands of women who have had the implants, but can be life-changing for some women. As a result of concerns raised by mesh-affected women, in April 2018 the then Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Jeremy Hunt MP, announced a review into the use of vaginal mesh. The review was led by Baroness Julia Cumberlege and recommendations made in the report of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety (IMMDS) “First Do No Harm”. The Government published its response to the IMMDS Review in July 2021.
-
News Article
Epilepsy drug that harms babies may damage their children too
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
An epilepsy drug that caused disabilities in thousands of babies after being prescribed to pregnant women could be more dangerous than previously thought. Sodium valproate could be triggering genetic changes that mean disabilities are being passed on to second and even third generations, according to the UK’s medicines regulator. The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has also raised concerns that the drug can affect male sperm and fertility, and may be linked to miscarriages and stillbirths. Ministers are already under pressure after it emerged in April that valproate was still being prescribed to women without the legally required warnings. Six babies a month are being born after having been exposed to the drug, the MHRA has said. It can cause deformities, autism and learning disabilities. Cat Smith, the Labour chairwoman of the all-party parliamentary group on sodium valproate, said: “This transgenerational risk is very concerning. There have been rumours that this was a possibility, but I had never heard it was accepted until last week by the MHRA." “The harm from sodium valproate was caused by successive failures of regulators and governments, and this news means it could be an order of magnitude worse than we first thought. It underlines the need for the Treasury to step up to their responsibilities around financial redress to those families.” Read full story (paywalled) Source: Sunday Times, 19 June 2022 -
Content ArticleThe use of pelvic mesh was paused in the UK in 2018 after some patients developed complications and severe pain following the treatment. In this report for CNA, a Singapore-based news channel, Kath Sansom, founder of campaign group Sling The Mesh, talks about the severe pain and life-changing side effects she experienced after pelvic mesh surgery. The report highlights the risks associated with mesh removal surgery, the fact that women harmed by mesh have been dismissed and ignored by the healthcare system, and concerns that the number of patients who experience complications from pelvic mesh has been underestimated. It also outlines the need for stronger medical device regulation in the UK, and looks at issues with compensation and redress for patients harmed by mesh.
-
Content ArticleThis study by Sir Robert Francis QC looks at options for a framework for compensation for the victims of the infected blood tragedy. Sir Robert will give evidence about his work to the Infected Blood Inquiry in July. Before then, it is important that the Inquiry, and recognised legal representatives of its infected and affected core participants, have an opportunity to consider his work.
-
Content ArticleIn 2020, the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety (IMMDS) Review made specific recommendations that the government provide justice and redress to thousands of women who have been harmed by surgical mesh implants. Surgical mesh, also known as transvaginal tape, is a medical device surgically implanted to support organs and tissue. It is primarily used to treat urinary incontinence in women, but is also used to treat hernias and to reinforce abdominal areas where women have had tissue removed to reconstruct their breasts after mastectomy. In this article for the Mail Online, John Naish highlights that two years after the IMMDS, none of its recommendations have been implemented properly and surgical mesh is still being used. He examines the case of Kelly Cook, a 37 year-old mother who has been left with constant pain, nerve issues and incontinence after mesh surgery in 2018. In spite of the impact the mesh is having on her life, she has been told she may not be seen at one of the new specialist mesh centres for two years due to the length of the waiting list. The article also highlights the fact that no financial redress has yet been offered to mesh victims, that women's pain is still not being seen as a serious issue, and that there is a concerning lack of research into the safety of mesh devices.
-
Content ArticleSharon Hartles is a critical criminologist and member of the Open University’s Harm and Evidence Research Collaborative. In this blog, Sharon reflects on events that have unfolded since the publication of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review 'First Do No Harm' report and the Government's response to it. She examines ongoing failures in the government's response and fulfilment of their policy recommendations. Related reading Primodos, mesh and sodium valproate: Recommendations and the UK Government’s response (Sharon Hartles, August 2021) Primodos: The next steps towards justice (November 2020) Mesh: Denial, half-truths and the harms (March 2021) Sodium Valproate: The Fetal Valproate Syndrome Tragedy
-
Content ArticleOn Wednesday 26 January, the All-Party Parliamentary Group for First Do No Harm (APPG FDNH) held a virtual public meeting on the topic of redress schemes for those who have suffered avoidable harm linked to pelvic mesh, sodium valproate and Primodos. This meeting was an opportunity to hear from representatives of various patient groups about what victims need and what they are missing from current support mechanisms. Below is a recording of the meeting.
- Posted
- 1 comment
-
- (and 5 more)
-
Content Article
On Wednesday 26 January, the All-Party Parliamentary Group for First Do No Harm (APPG FDNH) held a virtual public meeting on the topic of redress schemes for those who have suffered avoidable harm linked to pelvic mesh, sodium valproate and Primodos. This meeting was an opportunity to hear from representatives of various patient groups about what victims need and what they are missing from current support mechanisms. The meeting heard from Kath Sansom, founder of the Sling the Mesh campaign. Attached is the speech she presented and results from the Sling the Mesh survey. View the recording of the public meeting -
Content ArticleIn this blog Patient Safety Learning provides an overview of the key points included in its response to the call for evidence for the Health and Social Care Select Committee Inquiry examining the case for reform of NHS litigation.
-
Content Article
JCP Solicitors: NHS Redress Scheme
Patient Safety Learning posted an article in Legal matters
The NHS Redress Scheme, also known as the “Putting Things Right Scheme,” is a method of handling and investigating complaints about the NHS service within Wales. In NHS Redress claims, redress may consist of an apology, or a financial award of compensation of up to £25,000.00 (The limit for the NHS Redress Compensation claims). JCP Solicitors explains the Redress Scheme and how to claim under the scheme. -
Content ArticleThe Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) makes final decisions on complaints that have not been resolved by the NHS in England and UK government departments and other UK public organisations. They look into complaints where someone believes there has been injustice or hardship because an organisation has not acted properly or has given a poor service and not put things right. They look into complaints fairly and the service is free for everyone. This leaflet gives an overview in to how the PHSO looks into complaints.
- Posted
- 1 comment
-
- (and 2 more)
