Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Patient safety incident'.

More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning campaigns
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • Patient Safety Standards
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
    • Data and insight
    • Research
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Categories

  • Files

Calendars

  • Community Calendar

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End

Group

First name

Last name

Country

Join a private group (if appropriate)

About me

Organisation

Role

Found 684 results
  1. Content Article
    Drawing on his research and practice, Steven Shorrock explores the various barriers that we face when trying to make sense of Just Culture, inviting readers to refl ect on the intricate nature of justice and safety in our complex world
  2. Content Article
    On 29 September 2023, a group of NHS staff and Experts by Experience joined a Teams meeting to help the National Patient Safety team in NHS England (NHSE) to answer two important questions. 1. Is it a good idea to keep asking NHS staff to record the level of psychological harm experienced by patients and service users, after a patient safety incident? 2. If so, how we can help make sure this is done as well and accurately as possible? Here is the write up of the workshop.
  3. Content Article
    Healthcare is starting to embrace a shift towards Just Culture. In England, the new Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) prioritises respect, compassion, and systemic improvements. The potential benefits of this, and other initiatives, are significant, as Suzette Woodward reports
  4. Event
    until
    The Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) service is the NHS's new system for the recording and analysis of patient safety events. Very little research had been done before to understand the best ways to make sure patients, service users and their families can give their views on safety incidents, for the whole NHS to learn from. Learning from patients’ experiences and how they feel about the care they have received is known to be a very good way to make healthcare services better. However, getting the right information from people in the right way, and making sure the right NHS staff see it and can act on it, is difficult to do. This Show and Tell outlines the research completed to understand how we can do this better through the introduction of the LFPSE service. Audience: This is a publicly open event for anyone interested in understanding the work that NHS England has completed into understanding the best ways to make sure patients, service users and their families can give their views on safety incidents, for the whole NHS to learn from. Speakers: Lucie Mussett Patient Safety Lead & Senior Product Manager for the Learn from patient safety events (LFPSE) service Hope Bristow – Senior User Centred Designer (Informed Solutions) Natasha Hughes – User Researcher (Informed Solutions) Register
  5. Content Article
    The Covid-19 pandemic resulted in major disruption to healthcare delivery worldwide causing medical services to adapt their standard practices. Learning how these adaptations result in unintended patient harm is essential to mitigate against future incidents. Incident reporting and learning system data can be used to identify areas to improve patient safety. A classification system is required to make sense of such data to identify learning and priorities for further in-depth investigation. The Patient Safety (PISA) classification system was created for this purpose, but it is not known if classification systems are sufficient to capture novel safety concepts arising from crises like the pandemic. This study from Purchase et al. aimed to review the application of the PISA classification system during the COVID-19 pandemic to appraise whether modifications were required to maintain its meaningful use for the pandemic context. The study found that PISA taxonomy can be successfully applied to patient safety incident reports to support the first stages in deriving learning and identifying areas for further enquiry. No incidents were identified that warranted new codes to be added to the PISA classification system, which may extend to other substantive public health crises, negating the need for additional, specific coding within such classification systems and related frameworks for similar system-wide constraints.
  6. Event
    The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) arguably represents the most significant change to investigating and managing patient safety incidents in the history of the NHS. To embed PSIRF effectively within organisations, healthcare teams need to understand and utilise a range of new techniques and disciplines. Clinical audit is an established quality improvement methodology that is often overlooked by patient safety teams, but will play an increasingly important role in ensuring that PSIRF fully delivers its stated objectives. CQC reports often highlight the importance of clinical audit as a measurement and assurance tool that can raise red flags if used appropriately. Indeed, both the Ockenden and Kirkup reports highlighted the importance of clinical audit in identifying and quantifying substandard care. While SEIPS, After Action Reviews, more in-depth interviewing techniques, etc. are all receiving much fanfare in relation to PSIRF, the importance of clinical audit needs to be better understood. This short course will explain how organisations who use clinical audit effectively will increase patient safety and better understand why incidents take place. We will look at the key role of audit in understanding work as imagined and works as done and show why national audits can assist with creating patient safety plans. Change analysis and the effective implementation of safety actions are keys to PSIRF delivery and clinical audit will assist in the delivery of both. We will also demonstrate the important, but often under-appreciated role, clinical audit staff will have in the successful delivery of PSIRF. Key learning outcomes: Why clinical audit is an integral element of PSIRF. Why clinical audit staff have a vital role to play in PSIRF. How clinical audit data can help raise red flags and spot risks. Using clinical audit to better understand your incidents. Ensuring your safety actions are working. Using audit to assess your patient safety incident investigations. Register hub members will receive 20% discount. Email info@pslhub.org for a discount code.
  7. Event
    This one day masterclass is part of a series of masterclasses focusing on how to use Human Factors in your workplace and is aligned with the new Patient Safety Syllabus and subsequent Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF). The new Patient Safety Strategy advises that organisations must adopt a new and broader approach to stimulate learning from patient safety incidents. This course is designed to assist healthcare professionals involved in this important work. The main purpose is to provide learners with a full understanding of the various approaches that can now be used to conduct patient safety incident investigation (PSIIs). Traditionally, root cause analysis has been used as a blanket approach to diagnosing why patient safety have been compromised, but healthcare teams are henceforth being encouraged to adopt a wider range of methods that will both save time and facilitate enhanced learning. The focus is now on appropriate proportionality in response to incidents that occur in their organisation. Key learning objectives: Understand the new patient safety landscape Understand the need for proportionality of investigation Learn how to use a range of techniques for conducting PSIIs Understand how to write an impactful improvement plan Consider how your current approach to patient safety investigations compares to the agreed national standards Understand typical pitfalls and traps associated with this wider work stream and tips for avoiding them. The course is facilitated by Tracy Ruthven and Stephen Ashmore who have significant experience of undertaking patient safety reviews in healthcare. They were commissioned to write a national RCA guide by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership. They have also authored articles on significant event analysis and clinical audit/quality improvement, all techniques seen as increasingly relevant to improving patient safety. Register hub members receive a 20% discount. Email info@pslhub.org for the discount code.
  8. Event
    This session will provide an opportunity to ‘have a go’ and discuss some of the challenges and practical aspects of using thematic analysis for the purpose of learning from patient safety issues. This course is 3 hours long. On completion of the course you will receive a certificate of attendance, and as this course is CPD accredited you are awarded 3 CPD points. Register
  9. Event
    until
    This session will provide an opportunity to ‘have a go’ and discuss some of the challenges and practical aspects of using thematic analysis for the purpose of learning from patient safety issues. This course is 3 hours long. On completion of the course you will receive a certificate of attendance, and as this course is CPD accredited you are awarded 3 CPD points. Register
  10. Event
    until
    This session will provide an opportunity to ‘have a go’ and discuss some of the challenges and practical aspects of using thematic analysis for the purpose of learning from patient safety issues. This course is 3 hours long. On completion of the course you will receive a certificate of attendance, and as this course is CPD accredited you are awarded 3 CPD points. Register
  11. Event
    until
    This session will provide an opportunity to ‘have a go’ and discuss some of the challenges and practical aspects of using thematic analysis for the purpose of learning from patient safety issues. This course is 3 hours long. On completion of the course you will receive a certificate of attendance, and as this course is CPD accredited you are awarded 3 CPD points.
  12. Content Article
    Despite years of calls for adoption of a Just Culture, it is evident that taking this concept from paper to practice has been slower than expected. Many have cited the subpar application of the Just Culture framework and, recently, questions have been raised regarding how the Just Culture framework is perceived by those impacted by harm, including patients, family members, and staff. Though this framework is one tool that can be used to guide inquiry after harm events, its use, independent of active efforts toward restoration of relationships with patients, families, and staff, could compromise engagement and therefore learning. A lack of focus on restoring the trust of those affected by harm in parallel with the event investigation introduces a risk of further compounding the harm for all involved. Those involved in safety work at NHS England have recognized the need to apply a systems mindset within a concerted effort toward more compassionate engagement for optimal learning and improvement. In response, they have included compassionate engagement and involvement of those affected by patient safety incidents as a foundational pillar in the NHS England Patient Safety Incident Response Framework.
  13. Content Article
    Incident investigation remains a cornerstone of patient safety management and improvement, with recommendations meant to drive action and improvement. However, there is little empirical evidence about how—in real-world hospital settings—recommendations are generated or judged for effectiveness.
  14. Content Article
    ‘Compassionate communication, meaningful engagement’ is a handbook for all NHS staff which aims to improve collaboration with patients, their families and carers following a patient safety event. Developed with NHS Trusts across England in partnership with Making Families Count, the guide includes principles of compassionate engagement, roles and responsibilities of healthcare professionals, and information about the processes following an incident. It also brings together a range of signposting information and resources for families and staff.
  15. Content Article
    Stephen Ashmore and Tracy Ruthven, Co-Directors of Clinical Audit Support Centre Limited, have created a simple, eye-catching poster to explain the new Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF). Here they explain why they created the graphic. You can download the poster by clicking on the image or downloading it from the attachment at the bottom of the page.
  16. Content Article
    The 'Learning Response Review and Improvement Tool' is intended to be used by: Those writing learning response reports following a patient safety incident or complaint, to inform the development of the written report. Peer reviewers of written reports to provide constructive feedback on the quality of reports and to learn from the approach of others. Development of this tool and set of standards was informed by a research study from Paul Bowie, Programme Director for Safety & Improvement at NHS Education for Scotland (NES), identified ‘traps to avoid’ in safety investigations and report writing. The tool was originally developed by NHS Scotland. It has been further refined in collaboration with HSIB and NHS England after being piloted in approximately 20 NHS trusts and healthcare organisations in England. The content validity of the tool is currently being assessed.
  17. Content Article
    Have you ever stopped and considered what the link is between the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) and Hollywood? Probably not. Most likely, you have spent the summer of 2023 immersed in your organisation’s transition from the Serious Incident Framework (SIF) to PSIRF. Outside work, for those of us who are cinema-goers, our main Hollywood-related dilemma has revolved around which to watch first, Barbie or Oppenheimer? At the end of April 2023, we were offered the opportunity to present at the Health Care Plus conference, held at the EXCEL centre in London. Ours was the graveyard slot: Day 2 of the conference; 3.15 pm. The time when, quite understandably, the conference participants attentional capacity is usually waning. How could we encourage participants to stay the distance? How do you make a graveyard slot at the end of a two-day conference engaging?  More importantly, how do you rise to that challenge when the topic is implementing PSIRF? Our solution? Bring in Hollywood. Make PSIRF glamorous. Our blog shares what we presented: ‘PSIRF: The Hollywood Edit'. Unifying key messages from NHS England’s PSIRF guidance (NHS England, August 2022) with Hollywood movie titles and a bit of what we have learnt and reflected on along the way. 
  18. News Article
    A struggling ambulance trust could face a ‘Titanic moment’ and collapse entirely this summer if the region’s worsening problems with hospital handover delays are not taken more seriously, its nursing director has told HSJ. Mark Docherty, of West Midlands Ambulance Service (WMAS), said patients were “dying every day” from avoidable causes created by ambulance delays and that he could not understand why NHS England and the Care Quality Commission were “not all over” the issue. He revealed that handover delays at the region’s hospitals were the worst ever recorded, that rising numbers of people were waiting in the back of ambulances for 24 hours, and that serious incidents have quadrupled in the past year, largely due to severe delays. More than 100 serious incidents recorded at WMAS relate to patient deaths where the service has been unable to respond because its ambulances are held outside hospitals, according to the minutes of the trust’s March quality and safety committee. "Around 17 August is the day I think it will all fail,” he said. “I’ve been asked how I can be so specific, but that date is when a third of our resource [will be] lost to delays, and that will mean we just can’t respond. Mathematically it will be a bit like a Titanic moment. ”It will be a mathematical certain that this thing is sinking, and it will be pretty much beyond the tipping point by then.” Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 25 May 2022
  19. News Article
    A woman who had her ovaries removed by mistake was one victim of the hundreds of “never events” that occurred in the NHS over the past year. Between April 2021 and March 2022 more than 400 patients in England’s hospitals suffered errors so serious that they should never have happened according to data released by NHS England. They include the wrong hips, legs, eyes and knees being operated on, and diabetic patients being given too much insulin. Foreign objects were left inside 98 patients after operations, including gauzes, swabs, drill guides, scalpel blades and needles. Vaginal swabs were left in patients 32 times and surgical swabs were left 21 times. Other objects left inside patients included part of a pair of wire cutters, part of a scalpel blade, and the bolt from surgical forceps. On three separate occasions part of a drill bit was left in a patient. “Wrong-site surgery” was carried out on 171 patients and six patients had injections to the wrong eye. The wrong hip implant was put in 12 times, a wrong knee implant was performed 11 times, and patients were connected to air instead of oxygen 13 times. Seven patients were given the wrong type of blood during a transfusion. Some patients were given doses of drugs that were far too high, including the immunosuppressant methotrexate, which is used for severe arthritis, psoriasis and leukaemia. There were 11 overdoses of insulin. Read full story (paywalled) Source: The Times, 19 May 2022
  20. News Article
    The number of notified “extreme” and “major” incidents involving serious harm to patients and others in hospital has risen significantly in the Republic of Ireland in recent years, new figures reveal. Reported “extreme” incidents, which can involve death or permanent incapacity, rose from 373 in 2017 to 579 last year. The number of cases classified as “major”, where there is long-term disability or incapacity, climbed from 46 to 82 in the same period. “Moderate” incidents, when there is a patient injury involving medical treatment, also increased from 9,219 in 2017 to 13,563 last year. Minor incidents, involving injury or illness needing first aid, also increased over the same time from 9,210 to 15,483. The figures, involving patients, staff, visitors, contractors and the public, were released by the HSE in response to a parliamentary question from Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín. A spokewoman for the HSE said: “It is HSE policy that all incidents are identified, reported and reviewed so that learning from events can be shared to improve the quality and safety of services.” “The number of reported incidents has increased year on year since 2004 with a significant increase noted since 2015, with the introduction of the National Incident Management System.” Read full story Source: Independent.ie, 3 May 2022
  21. News Article
    Ambulance trusts are seeing rising numbers of serious incidents resulting from delays in reaching patients, research by HSJ has uncovered. Serious incidents are defined by the NHS as a patient safety failure “where the consequences to patients, families and carers, staff or organisations are so significant or the potential for learning is so great, that a heightened level of response is justified.” East Midlands Ambulance Service Trust saw 71 serious incidents in 2021-22 compared with 38 in the financial year before. The trust’s board papers attribute the increase in SIs related to delayed responses since June 2021 to “sustained pressure on the service” and the resulting growing handover times at accident and emergency departments. Of 14 SIs reported in February and the first half of March 2022, seven were due to “prolonged waits for an ambulance response”. West Midlands University Ambulance Service Foundation Trust has also seen an increase in SIs. Its board papers report that half of the SIs are due to “delays in reaching patients resulting in harm, serious harm, and deaths”. It has given the issue of “hospitals, breaches, delays and turnaround times” the maximum rating of 25 on its risk register. Long delays – especially for category two patients, where average performance last month was above an hour – are causing increasing concern. Stroke Association chief executive Juliet Bouverie said the organisation was hearing “shocking accounts from stroke survivors who have waited hours for an ambulance… We are extremely worried that stroke survivors’ lives and recoveries are being put at extreme risk.” Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 20 April 2022
  22. News Article
    Patients continue to experience avoidable harms from unsafe care because the NHS fails to learn from its mistakes, a report that tracked what actions the NHS took following safety reviews over several decades has found. Patient Safety Learning looked at the findings of a variety of investigations, including widespread public inquiries, Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) reports, Prevention of Future Deaths reports, incident reports, and complaints and legal action by patients and their families. It found an “implementation gap” in learning lessons and taking action to prevent future harms. It highlighted an absence of a systemic and joined up approach to safety; poor systems for sharing learning and acting on that learning; lack of system oversight, monitoring, and evaluation; and unclear patient safety leadership. Helen Hughes, chief executive of Patient Safety Learning, said, “Time and time again there is a lack of action and coordination in responding to recommendations, an absence of systems to share learning, and a lack of commitment to evaluate and monitor the effectiveness of safety recommendations. “This is a shocking conclusion that is an affront to all those patients and families who have been assured that ‘lessons have been learnt’ and ‘action will be taken to prevent future avoidable harm to others.’ The healthcare system needs to understand and tackle the barriers for implementing recommendations, not just continually repeat them.” The report calls for “systemwide commitment and resources, with effective and transparent performance monitoring” for patient safety inquiries and reviews and HSIB reports to ensure that the accepted recommendations translate into action and improvement. Read full story Source: BMJ, 8 April 2022
  23. News Article
    A nurse has been suspended for three months by the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) after forcing medication into a person with dementia's mouth. An NMC Fitness to Practise (FtP) panel found Reni Kirilova had forced medicine into the patient’s mouth, held her mouth closed and shouted ‘take your tablets’ while working at the Chocolate Quarter Care Home in Bristol, run by the St Monica Trust. Patient was reportedly distressed, waving her hands and shouting The incident occurred on 30 May 2019, seven days after Ms Kirilova began working at the care home on 23 May. She was suspended on 7 June pending a police investigation and she resigned the same day. One witness told the NMC hearing that they saw the nurse’s fingers go over the patient’s mouth for around 30 seconds while the patient was ‘flapping her hands’ and ‘trying to spit them out’. They added the patient was distressed and was ‘waving her hands everywhere’ and shouting ‘no, no, no’. Ms Kirilova denied the allegations and said that she had given the patient some water and then tilted the patient’s chin to help her swallow. The panel found that the allegation she held her hand over the patient’s mouth was not true but that she had held it closed in some way, after three witnesses corroborated this. The panel said they were not satisfied that she had considered how she would cope with stressful situations in the future and there was a risk it could happen again. Read full story Source: Nursing Standard, 7 April 2022
  24. News Article
    The Care Quality Commission is to prosecute an acute trust after a patient was injured when allegedly exposed to “avoidable harm”. United Lincolnshire Hospitals Trust is due to appear tomorrow afternoon at Boston Magistrates’ Court. The alleged incident took place at Lincoln County Hospital, the CQC said. Although the CQC declined to comment further, Lincolnshire Live reported the alleged incident involved 91-year-old Iris Longmate and relates to a failure to provide safe care and treatment on or before 3 March 2019. The local publication added court papers claimed “at the same time ULHT also failed to give safe care and treatment to patients on Greetwell Ward, who were ‘being exposed to a significant risk of avoidable harm occurring’”. Proceedings are being brought under sections 22 and 12 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. These rules require providers to take reasonable steps to minimise risks to people’s health and safety during treatment, and make it a criminal offence if a provider fails to comply and a patient suffers avoidable harm or is exposed to a risk of this happening. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 24 March 2022
  25. News Article
    A senior medic has won a whistleblowing case after judges ruled she was dismissed after raising concerns about a new procedure her department was using. An employment tribunal found consultant nephrologist Jasna Macanovic was fired from Portsmouth Hospitals University Trust in March 2018 after telling bosses a dialysis technique called “buttonholing”, which had been “championed” there, was potentially dangerous. The trust’s case was that the way she had gone about raising concerns had made for an untenable working environment in the Wessex Kidney Centre. The process saw a Care Quality Commission complaint, an independent investigation and multiple referrals to the General Medical Council. Employment Judge Fowell said: “The plain fact is that after over twenty years of excellent service in the NHS, Dr Macanovic was dismissed from her post shortly after raising a series of protected disclosures about this one issue. It is no answer to a claim of whistleblowing to say that feelings ran so high that working relationships broke down completely, and so the whistleblower had to be dismissed.” Dr Macanovic resigned from the regional renal transplant team in July 2016 when she discovered two incidents had occurred that “had not been reported by either surgeon” and felt that one of the surgeons had misled the medical director over the issue, the tribunal heard. In an email sent after the resignation meeting, Dr Macanovic said the practice was considered inappropriate by the vast majority of experts in the field and that no other renal unit in England was using it. The case exposes some worrying governance, both within the trust and between it and the Care Quality Commission, with which the issues were raised in 2016. When the CQC asked the trust for more information the unit’s clinical director responded that in his view that the deaths and infections were not due to the buttonholing. The CQC made no further enquiries and wrote back saying “they were satisfied that there were no safety concerns and that appropriate governance had been followed”. Read full story Source: HSJ, 24 March 2022
×
×
  • Create New...