Jump to content
  • From the exit door of HSIB: Challenging feedback and a health warning for patients and families


    richard vA

    Summary

    Richard von Abendorff, an outgoing member of the Advisory Panel of the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB), has written an open letter to incoming Directors on what the new Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB) needs to address urgently and openly to become an exemplary investigatory safety learning service and, more vitally, how it must not contribute to compounded harm to patients and families.

    The full letter is attached at the end of this page.

    Content

    HSIB as experienced and observed vs HSIB as imagined and described (and not researched!): a patient system perspective

    Dear Ted and Rosie and all incoming Directors to HSSIB,

    In 2017 I wrote an open article making demands of HSIB to be patient centred. Six years later, having following HSIB closely, and in some aspects intimately, I write an open letter from a point of despair as HSSIB emerges from HSIB and I end my formal involvement as the patient safety expert from experience on the Advisory Panel. Nothing I say may surprise you, but I hope the incoming executive considers these issues seriously and urgently.

    I raise it in this public way as I believe if these issues are not transparently and explicitly addressed as a matter of urgency, I cannot assure other patients and families should they become involved with HSSIB. I say this for fear they will experience compounded harm and, related and additional to this (as I will expound below), I have significant concerns about the quality and output of HSIB investigations to achieve maximum impact, utilising the patient and family perspectives. 

    HSSIB must prioritise its development to become exemplary and better than what has gone before (based on evidence) and to also be valuable not harmful for patients and families. Patient safety in England needs a place where trust and faith are restored, with evidence showing it listens, learns and acts by putting patients and their advocates at the centre.

    The issues can be examined from three perspectives relevant at this juncture:

    • A review of its past work given it has new power.
    • The new governance arrangements coming in to place, but without patient voice at its heart.
    • Various concerns over the last 6 years that cannot be ignored, and a recognition already acknowledged by yourselves, Ted and Rosie, that the patient involvement aspects require more work.

    My full letter details the experiences I draw upon.

    I challenge the lack of evidence base and research on HSIB that claim it is truly independent drawing on patient and family perspectives. I do not go in to detail on other publicly shared criticisms of HSSB, but I believe these criticisms cannot be ignored and have not been adequately addressed.

    I bring to everyone’s attention that the Advisory Panel I was on had no explicit or expected role in even commenting on these types of issues but some members did at times. Given Governance at HSSIB is now being established in a more recognised, explicit and conventional way, I believe the Non-Executive Directors and Executive Directors have a vital role to immediately address these concerns drawing on independent expertise.

    I challenge the opinion that HSIB has an innovative or patient-centred engagement model. It focuses on the important issues of accessibility and basic, respectful communication with patients and families – something we have seen that has not been done by health bodies. But it does no more than this. This is not exemplar family involvement.

    The letter relates independence to patient-centredness in a way contrary to how HSIB has worked in the past and refers to the vital need to report authentic accurate accounts of patients. It argues that much work has to be done to avoid bias towards health service perceptions, and to make patients and their advocates more central in all HSSIB processes, from scoping to evaluation.

    Family involvement is so much more than engagement. And in all these processes, patients need not only empowerment but advocacy and support. If HSSIB does not do this, who will give it the recognition it needs?

    The letter looks at the relationship between restorative approaches and investigations and how to minimise or, ideally, eliminate compounded harm and to get quality investigations drawing on the valuable insights of families and the patient-led framework that is needed. This itself deserves ongoing research, development and typologisation.

    Engagement with whistleblowers in the NHS, and indeed within HSSIB, as a starting point to be any kind of exemplary service also requires explicit, transparent, evidence-based attention given HSIB’s previous history of this (and some key issues are identified in the letter).

    The letter recognises the innovative and challenging role HSSIB takes on and that it cannot shirk from addressing these if it seeks to be truly innovative.

    However, based on experiences to date, unless HSSIB urgently takes on this challenge, I cannot express any assurance to families who consider participating. I have been a critical friend for a very long time and now can just be a serious critic in making these challenges.

    One big question remaining is why these limitations still exist after more than six years of HSIB? One issue has to be to move away from a solely or predominantly technocratic and medically centred and medically organised framework. This also requires consideration.

    Richard von Abendorff, 12 October 2023

    Download the full letter here or from the attachment at the end of the page:

    Open letter to HSSIB.pdf

     

    About the Author

    Richard is an outgoing member of the Advisory Panel of HSIB since its inception, a member of the recently disbanded Citizens Partnership of HSIB, a campaigner and a family member involved in a reference case of a national HSIB investigation.

    Attachments

    OpenlettertoHSSIB.pdf
    0 reactions so far

    13 Comments

    Recommended Comments

    I do hope other comments will be added. The incoming Board requires constructive food for thought as it launches the next stage with theoretically&  legally more powers and independence but in a just as challenging context.  Learning from tragic deaths of mental health patients requires huge sensitivity,   sophistication and patient and family centredness 

    • 0 reactions so far
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The failure of health investigative bodies to put the patient/complainant at the heart of their investigations renders the investigation almost worthless in the eyes of the complainant. Why should complainants go to the extensive effort of following the complaints process to report patient safety incidents if they are to be sidelined when the investigation takes place?

    Patients and families understand that the complaint is their complaint and that they want to see some form of just resolution. But investigative organisations see the investigation as being a systemic/procedural investigation belonging to them, in which the complainant merely reports the complaint and has no further role. To paraphrase the Health Service Ombudsman "the complaint belongs to the complainant, but the investigation belongs to the Ombudsman". It is disappointing to see HSSIB adopting a similar outlook.

    Unless HSSIB understands that sidelining complainants is harmful and disrespectful and that complainants need to be involved in the investigation there can be no proper resolution of the complaint for the complainant and HSSIB will become yet another body that fails the public and causes harm to vulnerable and distressed complainants. Complaints are not just systemic and procedural issues, they are also matters of resolution and healing. 

    • 0 reactions so far
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    well put-there is a difference between a complaint and a report of harm in my opinion. , but each deserve full respect, attention and centering pf patients views, for similar reasons. hsib is looking at harm reduction and  looking at systemic issues-which patients are well able to engage with if given an opportunity-their efforts should be respected fully

    • 0 reactions so far
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 16/10/2023 at 15:48, Nicholas Wheatley said:

    The failure of health investigative bodies to put the patient/complainant at the heart of their investigations renders the investigation almost worthless in the eyes of the complainant. Why should complainants go to the extensive effort of following the complaints process to report patient safety incidents if they are to be sidelined when the investigation takes place?

    Patients and families understand that the complaint is their complaint and that they want to see some form of just resolution. But investigative organisations see the investigation as being a systemic/procedural investigation belonging to them, in which the complainant merely reports the complaint and has no further role. To paraphrase the Health Service Ombudsman "the complaint belongs to the complainant, but the investigation belongs to the Ombudsman". It is disappointing to see HSSIB adopting a similar outlook.

    Unless HSSIB understands that sidelining complainants is harmful and disrespectful and that complainants need to be involved in the investigation there can be no proper resolution of the complaint for the complainant and HSSIB will become yet another body that fails the public and causes harm to vulnerable and distressed complainants. Complaints are not just systemic and procedural issues, they are also matters of resolution and healing. 

    Very well said here here 

    • 0 reactions so far
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I do hope other comments will be added. The incoming Board requires constructive food for thought as it launches the next stage with theoretically&  legally more powers and independence but in a just as challenging context.  Learning from tragic deaths of mental health patients requires huge sensitivity,   sophistication and patient and family centredness 

    • 0 reactions so far
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    One omission from this feedback is a comment on the online feedback form of HSIB made available to all patients and families. I found it very unhelpful to capture my families feedback. There appeared little evidence of real Co production in its design. Most worrying and consistent with my letter is no evidence I could gain of analysis by HSIB  of feedback given.  A report was promised to the Advisory Panel in the penultimate meeting in June 2023 but despite promises minuted nothing has been forthcoming until the Advisory Panel formally ended. 

    • 0 reactions so far
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just received anonymised  summaries of 18 patient/ family feedback forms dating 2019 to 2023 (as promised). Concerns  on involvement and support confirmed for a significant minority from this small sample. No report on any more detailed analysis or response to this feedback. Wording of forms encourages underreporting of concerns. Poor design as full open letter comments. 

    • 0 reactions so far
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    At this time of truth telling in the covid inquiry ( or not at the time! ) I feel i have to add something, some of which i know is not unique to me on the former Advisory Panel:namely:

    HSSIB and its governance structure and design and personnel have at the highest level been chosen to enable tight control by DHSC, NHS establishment and core central medical establishment.  My concerns in practice about the lack of proper patient involvement, unbiased analysis  and the questionable scientific and evidence base are all the inevitable outcome.  Not to say HSSIB will not share some valuable insights.  But it is profoundly,  organisationally,  epistemically , ideologically restricted, restrained   and limited. And as austerity and staffing crises, and tight brutal NHS management culture plans to continue through to the next government ( no reassurance from Labour) one really wonders if it can be anything more than a token enterprise,  a badge of pride to some but a huge wasted opportunity and even more dangerous ( literally) fake remedy to a continuing and in many respects growing health care crisis.  Am I being too cynical or negative? I fear not at all.  End.

    • 0 reactions so far
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is the one page paper I wrote to Ilora  Finlay, Baroness Finlay of Llandaff, an expert in palliative care,  summarising key issues that HSIB failed to address in their paper HSIB: Variations in the delivery of palliative care services to adults (13 July 2023) and that my family feel were of key relevance if the report was to truly address family concerns about what happened to Dermot and all learning that could result. Sadly no one at HSIB or HSSIB or externally seems interested in even properly examining if HSIB did have any failings in their investigation process.

    Submission to Baroness Ilora Finlay.pdf

     

    • 0 reactions so far
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Having done a data Subject access request ( received in part so far)I discover the huge difficulties HSIB had in being challenged,  questioned. Causing stress to those implementing a model being rolled out, time demands,  patients just their to tell stories from memory not share insights..that is for the powerful  experts..reflecting what has been written elsewhere 

    when will services welcome and engage with feedback and ideas and not just treat them as people to be shut down or ignored  ( numerous examples  here) or managed away. ? 

     

     

     

     

    • 0 reactions so far
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...