Jump to content
  • A patient's tales of woe


    Clive Flashman
    • UK
    • Accounts and narratives
    • New
    • Everyone

    Summary

    This blog tells the story of a patient, a relation of Patient Safety Learning's Chief Digital Officer.

    It explains how the patient was failed by the system, seemingly a system designed to fail when its users need it most.

    Some of the issues described here are technology-based in nature, but the concepts are easy to grasp.

    A phrase that another person commented when hearing about this story was "when common sense and compassion are lost, there is no hope left for the NHS". I think we have now entered that territory (sadly).

    Do feel free to comment or add your own stories below....

    Content

    The elderly lady who had previously been fiercely independent and dismissive of most offers of care support was declining quickly. It was a bank holiday weekend and her family were desperate for diagnostic support, and managed to track down a Consultant Geriatrician willing to see her on Sunday morning. The Geriatrician was very concerned and wrote an immediate email referring her to the local palliative care team.

    She confirmed to the anxious family members that this was now an 'end of life' situation and should be managed accordingly although the timescale was not entirely clear yet.

    In the hours after the Geriatrician left, the patient – let's call her Anne* – declined even more rapidly. The family had managed to get care support in for that night, but in the meantime were struggling to help Anne. They found the number for the local emergency palliative care team. Knowing that the Geriatrician had already made a referral, they were hopeful that help might be available quickly.

    The person who answered the phone asked for the patient's name, checked their computer system, and said that they couldn't find it. The family explained that the emailed referral had been made several hours earlier that day to the main palliative care team. The emergency responder explained that the two palliative care teams operated separately and had separate software systems too. The referral would not be processed until Tuesday, after the bank holiday had ended. The family asked whether the emergency palliative care call handler could send help anyway and this was rejected. The common sense and compassionate thing to do would have been to have sent help or asked for the Geriatrician's email address to confirm the referral and urgency. Neither of these were done. No help was sent.

    This story shows just how fragmented systems are in the NHS – two parts of the same locality's palliative care team not able to see each other's information. It also illustrates that while some clinical services may be 24/7, the administrative support that may be key to their use is 'office hours' and that no appropriate 'coping mechanism' to deal with this has been created. Lastly, it shows that the NHS is melting down in terms of how it responds to many aspects of care provision, especially urgent and emergency care. Common sense and compassion are disappearing. When they are gone, I see little hope in the NHS providing the acceptable levels of care that people need and are entitled to.

    *Not her real name.

    Related reading on the hub:

     

    About the Author

    Clive Flashman is the Chief Digital Officer at Patient Safety Learning.

    0 reactions so far

    4 Comments

    Recommended Comments

    So sorry to hear.  The big question.  Who can patients and their families report these harm events to? To get independent expert patient focussed action.  No one from my experience.  There is a national consultation process needing engaging with. This must be done . Read here and please also share widely. If not now when?

    See below for the information I received:

    I’ve included an excerpt from the Task Profile we used for recruitment below, which explains more about the phase and its aims.

     "Discovery Phase is taking place over around 8 weeks, with the involvement of a Patient Safety Partner recruited through our internal processes – I’ve included an except from the Task Profile we used for recruitment below, which explains more about the phase and its aims.

    1.          The Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) service is a new national NHS service for the recording and analysis of patient safety events that occur in healthcare. This utilises new digital technologies to support learning from what does and does not go well, by replacing the National Reporting and Learning System with a new safety learning system. The service introduces a range of innovations to support the NHS to improve learning from the over 2.5 million patient safety events recorded each year, to help make care safer (see ‘How LFPSE will improve patient safety learning’). View this short animation: Introducing the Learn from Patient Safety Events service - YouTube.

    2.         Patients Safety Partner involvement is important for understanding how best to ensure patients, carers and families can contribute to national patient safety learning and improvement. The LFPSE project team are undertaking a Discovery Phase to understand how Patients and Families can best share their safety experiences within the NHS to help support national learning and improvement. A ‘discovery phase’ is a process that helps to “define the problem” and decide what (if any) work then needs to take place (e.g. designing and building software/applications).

    3.         The work will involve identifying target audiences (who else do we need to involve in the research?), what needs they are trying to meet (their aims after experiencing a patient safety event), what existing feedback channels or processes there are in place (where do people already go when wanting to share such information and experiences?), and any concerns/issues with current options (what stops people sharing their experiences? What makes it difficult to do? What gets in the way of this being used for learning?). At the end of the discovery phase, we will produce a report that summarises our findings, and makes recommendations for what should happen next. “

    We are recruiting patients and families via a number of channels – some directly, like yourself, where they have expressed an interest previously, and some via NHS England’s engagement teams, as well as via CQC. We have reached out to a number of advocacy groups (AvMA, Patients Association, Harmed Patients Alliance, and Care Opinion) to try to get a wide range of views represented, both of patients with experience of harm, and those without. This is important to ensure we design a user-friendly service for “novice” patients, as well as those who understand the landscape of patient safety better.

    The questions asked will cover things like whether the individual has any personal/family experience of harm; if not, do they know what a patient safety incident is, how they would describe the concept in their own words, where they would go if they had an experience that might involve a patient safety issue, what they would want out of that process, etc.

    The intention is very much to get a sense of the current state of play, level of knowledge and awareness of issues, terminology, and options open to patients, and to then use that to explore what kind of service will work best to ensure we can gather the learning from patients for use at a national level, whilst also giving patients what they need in terms of feedback/closure etc (which will likely need to happen at the provider level, rather than nationally).'

    to ask to be involved contact lucie[.]mussett[@]nhs.net  or natasha[.]hughes[@]nhs.net
    • 0 reactions so far
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The above is NHS patient safety response to this below.  I.am very concerned that the full vital patient voice will not be heard. This is a defining moment.  

     

    • 0 reactions so far
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No one currently investigates patient reports of harm from the patient perspective,  with a patient eye view & patient interests at heart.  They would require  both TRUE INDEPENDENCE ( of the reputation protecting NHS Trust involved and also be a fearless challenger, if needed  of the existing NHS  system and clinical base)  AND TRUE WIDE RANGING EXPERTISE  ( clinical,  human factors, safety & patient need focus), all woth with PATIENT OVERSIGHT  ( empowered. Informed. Suitably Rewarded. Co produced in a nutshell). Who can do that? Who will dare do that.  It is needed,  urgently . Will NHSE patient Safety dare? If you have thoughts: share here. Contact NHS staff above

    • 0 reactions so far
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...