Jump to content
  • Summary

    At Patient Safety Learning we believe that sharing insights and learning is vital to improving outcomes and reducing harm. That's why we created the hub; to provide a space for people to come together and share their experiences, resources and good practice examples. Since launching in 2019, the hub now has over 19,000 knowledge resources, 6900 member from 95 countries and over 1 million unique users.

    In this blog, the hub's Editor, Samantha Warne, reflects on the top 10 most popular pieces of content on the hub in 2024. It showcases the breadth of original content shared on the hub from patients, frontline staff and leaders in patient safety.

    Content

    CheckoutourTopPicks.thumb.png.0d6ece10cdce38f227d68326bab6d3d8.png1 Covid-19 : A risk assessment too far? A blog by David Osborn

    In a series of blogs for the hub, David Osborn, a health and safety practitioner has explored the way Government departments have handled healthcare worker safety during the Covid-19 pandemic. In this blog from September, David reflects on the misuse and abuse of ’risk assessment’, the very cornerstone of workplace health and safety. David explains how this left hundreds of thousands of healthcare workers at risk of catching Covid-19 as they provided close-quarter care to infectious patients. As the narrative unfolds, David introduces new information evidenced by emails and other correspondence obtained through Freedom of Information (FOI) requests.

    A simple guide to the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF)

    NHS organisations in England are changing the way they investigate patient safety incidents with the introduction of the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF). NHS England has produced detailed resources for patient safety leaders and policy makers about the purpose of PSIRF and what organisations are expected to do to deliver this part of the NHS Patient Safety Strategy. Our discussions with frontline clinicians, patient safety managers, educators and Patient Safety Partners have highlighted the need for a simple guide that helps communicate PSIRF to a wide range of stakeholders, including those who do not work in healthcare. This guide provides information about what PSIRF is and why it’s been introduced.

    Patient Safety Incident Response Plan (PSIRP) finder

    As part of PSIRF, every NHS trust is required to create and publish a Patient Safety Incident Response Plan (PSIRP). Patient Safety Learning is compiling PSIRPs from all NHS trusts in England in our PSIRP finder. Making these documents accessible in one central place will make them easy to find, allow trusts to compare ways of working and highlight variation in how trusts are approaching PSIRF implementation. We will continue to add links to plans as they become available.

    Application of SEIPS and AcciMap to a patient safety incident

    At the first Patient Safety Education Network meeting of the year, Chris Elston, a patient safety education lead, shared with the group a patient safety incident that happened at this trust. In this blog he describes how he used Safety Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) and Accident Mapping (AcciMap) to learn from it. 

    Electronic patient record systems: Putting patient safety at the heart of implementation

    Electronic patient record (EPR) systems have the potential to improve patient treatment, increase efficiency and reduce the costs of healthcare. However, it has become increasingly evident that introducing EPR systems comes with serious patient safety risks. In the report 'Electronic patient record systems: Putting patient safety at the heart of implementation', Patient Safety Learning looks at this in depth. Drawing on a recent roundtable event, it considers how patient safety can, and must, be put firmly at the heart of the design, development and rollout of EPR systems. This blog gives a summary of the report and the 10 principles it sets out for safe EPR system implementations.

    My experience of an outpatient hysteroscopy procedure

    Studies indicate that some women do not find hysteroscopy procedures painful. However, it is now widely recognised that many women experience severely painful and traumatic hysteroscopies. At Patient Safety Learning, we have worked with patients, campaigners, clinicians and researchers to understand the barriers to safe care and call for improvements. We believe that no woman should have to endure extreme pain or trauma when accessing essential healthcare.  We invited women to share their hysteroscopy experiences with us, and this blog is one of many stories shared on the hub. We’d like to thank all the patients for to sharing their experiences to help raise awareness of the patient safety issues surrounding outpatient hysteroscopy care.

    Patient Safety: Emerging Applications of Safety Science

    There are few resources and books for professionals within the patient safety sector that use case studies to model the practical application of theories of patient safety incident investigation. Exploring these theories, this book, published earlier this year, brings together contributors from a variety of academic and healthcare professions, alongside those with lived experience, to help you understand some of the emerging theories of safety science and their practical application.

    A silent safety scandal: A nurse’s first-hand account of a corridor nursing shift

    Corridor nursing has featured heavily in the media this year as it is increasingly being used in the NHS as demand for emergency care grows and A&E departments struggle with patient numbers. In this anonymous account, a nurse shares their experience of corridor nursing, highlighting that corridor settings lack essential infrastructure and pose many safety risks for patients. They also outline the practical difficulties providing corridor care causes for staff, as well as the potential for moral injury. Using the System Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework, they describe the work system, the processes and how that influences the outcomes.

    The hospital told me to GO HOME, but my daughter was critically sick. A bereaved mother’s 11 patient safety lessons

    It was a beautiful sunny summer’s day. Twenty-five year old Gaia Young had been out for a gentle bike ride to do some shopping, came home and had an ice cream in the garden in north London that afternoon. Just hours later she was dead. Gaia, the only daughter of Dorit Young, died of an unexplained brain condition after an emergency admission to a London teaching hospital on a Saturday night in July 2021. This is Dorit's story, as a bereaved mother, about lessons she has learnt following the unexpected death of her previously well daughter Gaia. Dorit has written 11 patient safety lessons in the hope this helps other families be more assertive if they have a critically sick relative in hospital.

    10 World Patient Safety Day 2024

    The theme of this year's World Patient Safety Day was 'Improving diagnosis for patient safety'. In this blog for World Patient Safety Day, Patient Safety Learning sets out the scale of avoidable harm in health and care and highlights the need for a transformation in our approach to patient safety. We reflect on the theme of this year’s event and our World Patient Safety Day blogs shared on the hub, drawing out some key areas, including rapid and timely diagnosis; improving investigations into diagnostic error and the importance of listening to patients.

    Share your experiences on the hub

    the hub is a platform for everyone with a professional or personal interest in patient safety to share and learn from one another. Have you implemented a new initiative in your organisation? Have you improved patient safety where you work? Or are you a patient and would like to share your experience to improve patient safety? 

    We would love to hear from you and share on the hub your stories. This can be done anonymously if you prefer.

    If you are a member, you can share directly on the hub or please contact [email protected] to discuss further.

    0 reactions so far

    2 Comments

    Recommended Comments

    As the Infection Preventionist in a for profit Skilled Nursing Facility in California USA. I saw ongoing issues with Safety of staff during the Pandemic. Firstly many staff were not correctly fitted for N95s, some doctors were never fitted. There were staff who failed fit testing but were working in the Covid 19 unit and administration knew, I told them. And admin could not provide the correct type of fitted mask. Despite telling staff it take 30 mins to make a seal they would take off their masks and put them back on in the same minute they the entered the infectious area. Some staff refused to wear disposable PPE be cause it was “wasteful”, they wanted reusable cotton gowns. Honestly i was ripping my hair out! 

    • 0 reactions so far
    Edited by Aneta Infection Prevention

    @Aneta Infection Prevention

    Thank you for sharing your experiences which, sadly, I fear will have been repeated many times over across the world .

    Whatever one's professional background, it is the most awful thing when you see things going on around you, which you know are wrong, abhorrent to all of your own moral and ethical principles and you know that people are going to get hurt (or worse), yet a crazy sort of national insanity prevails all around you, which you seem powerless to influence.

    I do so empathise. It has been the same for many of us in CATA, an alliance of healthcare professional organisations in the UK, struggling throughout the pandemic to instil some sense into UK healthcare authorities. Sadly, they are not easily persuaded.

    I suppose they are reluctant to admit that they got it wrong - unlike the past and present WHO Chief Scientists (Soumya Swaminathan and Sir Jeremy Farrar) who have, at least, 'fessed up' that WHO was far too late recognising airborne transmission and many lives could have been saved had they done so earlier.

    I'm not convinced that their remorse eases the pain of the bereaved and those suffering from Long Covid, but I suppose it's better than nothing. And better than in the UK where the key actors are remorseless and lacking an iota of contrition for the harm done.

    By the way, in the UK our standard for respiratory protection against airborne pathogens in healthcare is FFP3 (your equivalent of N99) as they afford very much more efficient protection. I have never understood why USA and EU opt for a lower level of protection. You healthcare workers 'over the pond' and 'over the Channel' are as valued (or should be as valued) as ours here.

    That said, it seems that the Covid-19 pandemic levelled the playing field in terms of undervaluing healthcare workers, either side of 'the pond' or the Channel.

    The UK Government/healthcare authorities abandoned our standard (for FFP3) on Friday 13th March, in favour of ineffective surgical masks, largely as a result of the guidance given by WHO, leading us to believe the disease was not airborne.

    It remains to be established to what extent, if at all, that WHO's stance on this may have been influenced by the Governments around the world (especially  the major financial sponsors like USA and UK) who didn't have enough respirators to equip everyone with 'airborne precautions. 

    One thing is sure. The lessons have to be learned before the next pandemic strikes, which judging by the latest evidence could be Avian flu H5N1, with a case fatality rate (lethality) more than ten times that of Covid-19. You will need better than N95s...

    • 0 reactions so far

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.