Summary
This article analyses the phenomenon of epistemic injustice within contemporary healthcare. It begins by detailing the persistent complaints patients make about their testimonial frustration and hermeneutical marginalisation, and the negative impact this has on their care. The authors offer an epistemic analysis of this problem using Miranda Fricker's account of epistemic injustice. They detail two types of epistemic injustice, testimonial and hermeneutical, and identify the negative stereotypes and structural features of modern healthcare practices that generate them. They claim that these stereotypes and structural features render ill persons especially vulnerable to these two types of epistemic injustice. The authors end by proposing five avenues for further work on epistemic injustice in healthcare.
"Without the narrative acts of telling and being heard, the patient cannot convey to anyone else – or to self – what he or she is going through. More radically and perhaps equally true, without these narrative acts, the patient cannot himself or herself grasp what the events of illness mean."
1 Comment
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now