Make publishing NHS workforce planning forecasts a legal duty

Despite workforce being the biggest challenge facing the health service, the Health and Care Bill provides no clarity on the numbers of staff this country needs, says Andrew Goddard in a HSJ article.

The Health and Care Bill returned to the Commons this week – as did the question of workforce planning. At the end of the spring term, MPs voted to reject an amendment to the bill which would have required the secretary of state to publish independent assessments of current and future workforce numbers every few years.

The following week, the House of Lords – led by Baroness Cumberlege, with support from Baroness Harding, Lord Stevens of Birmingham and other cross-party peers – voted to put a revised version of the amendment back in.

This particular game of ping pong about how we should plan the NHS and social care workforce is an important one. Workforce is not only a blindspot in the bill – it is a blindspot in the government’s ambitions for health and care.

A lack of staff risks undermining the true potential of the Health and Social Care Levy because there will be too few staff to carry out the additional checks and diagnostic procedures promised. The new diagnostic hubs are to be staffed with existing NHS colleagues.

Workforce shortages hampered our response to the pandemic and are already having a significant impact on our response to the backlog. They were also identified in the Ockenden Report as a driving factor in the avoidable deaths of 201 babies.

It is concerning then, that despite workforce being the biggest challenge facing the health service, the Health and Care Bill provides no clarity on the numbers of staff this country needs.

Read full story (paywalled)

Source: HSJ, 22 April 2022