Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Patient engagement'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning campaigns
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
    • Data and insight
    • Research
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


First name


Last name


Country


Join a private group (if appropriate)


About me


Organisation


Role

Found 1,304 results
  1. Content Article
    This article in the Pharmaceutical Journal outlines best practice principles and practical advice for structuring antimicrobial reviews and effective stewardship practices. It aims to equip pharmacists to: Understand the role of essential antimicrobial stewardship tools and frameworks to improve antibiotic prescribing; Structure an antimicrobial review effectively, covering all relevant details; Personalise the antimicrobial review to ensure patient-centred care and effective antimicrobial stewardship practices; Develop skills for effective antimicrobial review and stewardship practices to mitigate antimicrobial resistance threat.
  2. Content Article
    This article looks at US study showing that the simple act of a doctor sitting in a chair during hospital bedside discussions improves the experience for both doctors and patients. The research team examined whether educating internal medicine residents on the value of sitting and adding a wall-mounted folding chair in plain sight to hospital rooms would motivate doctors to use chairs. The study also measured the impact of whether this physician behaviour impacted patient perceptions. The results showed that: Education alone improved sitting frequency to 15%, but adding dedicated chairs for the clinicians in addition to any patient or visitor chairs improved sitting to 45%. In units where residents were given only education on the value of sitting, patients reported 49% of the time residents always spent enough time by the bedside with them, compared to 73% when a chair was available. In units with education only, 67% of the time residents always checked to ensure the patient understood everything, compared to 87% when a chair was present.
  3. Content Article
    In this blog, Patient Safety Partners Anne Rouse and Chris Wardley and Patient Safety Learning’s Chief Executive, Helen Hughes, examine the results of a recent survey of Patient Safety Partners (PSPs). The results reveal significant variation in how the PSP role is being implemented in NHS organisations in England and highlight frustration, barriers and successes that people in the role are experiencing.
  4. Content Article
    This cohort study examined whether sociodemographic characteristics affected patient access to and use of patient health care portals during the Covid-19 pandemic. The authors found significant disparities in portal use by sex, age, multimorbidity and health literacy were found. While disparities by sex and age decreased and were no longer statistically significant by 2021, disparities by multimorbidity remained consistent throughout the pandemic and disparities by health literacy were exacerbated.
  5. Content Article
    The Patients Association has been working with the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) to understand the impact the English language proficiency of health and care professionals has on patient and carer experiences. The HPCP is proposing changes to its English language proficiency requirements for applicants and this blog outlines key issues that were raised in an online focus group with patients, including: The impact of English language proficiency on patient experience Creating a fair system Partnering with patients and carers
  6. Content Article
    The Falls and Fragility Fractures Audit Programme (FFFAP) is looking to recruit new members to their award-winning Patient and Carer Panel. FFFAP is a national clinical audit run by the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership on behalf of NHS England and the Welsh Government. Their work aims to improve the care that patients with fragility fractures receive in hospital and after discharge and to reduce inpatient falls. 
  7. News Article
    Poorer people find it much harder to access NHS care than the well-off and have a worse experience when they do get it, research by the health service’s consumer watchdog has found. Those on the lowest incomes have much more difficulty getting a GP appointment, dental care or help with mental health problems, according to a survey by Healthwatch England. They are also more likely to feel they are not listened to by a health professional and not involved in key decisions about their care compared with those who are financially comfortable. The links between poverty and ill-health are well known, but the Healthwatch findings show that the worse-off also face the disadvantage what the watchdog called barriers to obtaining healthcare when they need it. The findings have prompted fears that the NHS is too often a “two-tier service” with access closely related to wealth, and calls for it to do more to make services more accessible to everyone. Healthwatch’s survey of 2,018 people aged 16 and over in England, which was a representative sample of the population, found that: 42% of those who described their financial situation as “really struggling” said they had trouble getting to see a GP, double the 21% of those who were “very comfortable”. 38% of the worst-off found it hard to get NHS dental care, compared with 20% of the better-off. 28% of the very poor had difficulty accessing mental health treatment, whereas only 9% of the very comfortable did so. Read full story Source: The Guardian, 4 March 2024
  8. Content Article
    Using experiences of care from over 10 million people collected over the past ten years, Healthwatch England presents a bold vision for the NHS in 2030. In a new report, Healthwatch outlines what they think the NHS should be in six years and how it can get there. The vision calls for a focus on three key themes: Making the NHS easier to access and navigate. Tackling health inequalities.  Building a patient-centred culture. 
  9. Content Article
    This ethnographic study looked at five local Healthwatch organisations to determine the extent to which they have fulfilled their intended role of fostering co-creation in health and social care in England. The study results demonstrate clear activity and some tangible impacts that have been achieved towards the aim of cocreation. However, the authors also highlight that the positioning of these organisations as 'collaborative insiders' in local governance systems has limited the issues that have been prioritised in co-creative activities. This analysis suggests that the increasing promotion of ideas of co-production in English health and social care has resulted in fertile grounds for localised co-creation. However, the authors highlight that the areas Healthwatch focused on were ones where other agencies in the system recognised their limitations, and where they knew they needed help to avoid socially undesirable outcomes. As a result, the approaches taken to co-creation by Healthwatch were largely conservative and constrained. The authors state that, "Even though they were not explicitly ruled out-of-bounds, Healthwatch officers knew that to be considered legitimate and serious players in the governance of health and social care, they needed to be selective about which issues they brought to the table."
  10. Content Article
    This month marks two years of the hub's Patient Safety Spotlight interview series. Patient Safety Learning's Content and Engagement Manager Lotty Tizzard reflects on the value of sharing personal insights and identifies the key patient safety themes that interviewees have highlighted over the past two years.
  11. Content Article
    Demos is Britain's leading cross-party think tank, working on different policy areas, from improving public services to building a more collaborative democracy. In this blog, Miriam Levin, Director of Participatory Programmes at Demos, tells us about their recent report, “I love the NHS but…”: Preventing needless harms caused by poor communication in the NHS. She argues there is an urgent need to improve NHS communications for patients and staff if we are to prevent people falling through the gaps and suffering worse health outcomes. Miriam highlights key issues with NHS referrals, disjointed computer systems and gaps in patient information, and offers some potential solutions. 
  12. Content Article
    On 8 February 2024, Ombudsman, Rob Behrens and Patient Safety Commissioner, Henrietta Hughes, wrote a joint letter to government. Both have regulatory roles to play in improving patient safety and both are struggling to gain headway with the recalcitrant NHS. Supposedly independent of government, this correspondence shows they are in fact totally dependent on government, due to their limited powers writes Della Reynolds in this blog.
  13. Content Article
    While some patients fully embrace access to test results as soon as they become available, those who may be less informed or receiving results for the first time may find reading results without the guidance of a doctor or oncologist to be fear-inducing and anxiety provoking. The intention of this poster from Tambre Leighn, presented at AACR2023, is to raise awareness and generate conversations about gaps in the process that create barriers and concerns along with potential strategies to improve the overall experience for patients, caregivers and their doctors without interfering with those patients who want to know without delay.
  14. Content Article
    Ombudsman, Rob Behrens and Patient Safety Commissioner, Henrietta Hughes, have written a letter to the Government sharing their joint concerns regarding what they see as the confrontational culture created by the complaints process in some areas of the NHS that undermines patient safety. 
  15. Content Article
    This animation aims to help staff and employers across health and social care understand Oliver's Training and why it is so vitally important. It was co-designed and co-produced with autistic people and people with a learning disability. Oliver McGowan died aged 18 in 2017 after being given antipsychotic medication to which he had a fatal reaction. He was given the medication despite his own and his family's assertions that he could not be given antipsychotics, and the fact that this was recorded in his medical records. The animation tells his story and highlights the increased risks facing people with learning disabilities and autism when accessing healthcare.
  16. Content Article
    Patient engagement technologies (PETs) are tools used to guide patients through the perioperative period. This study in the American Journal of Surgery aimed to investigate the levels of patient engagement with PETs through the perioperative period and its impact on clinical outcomes. The authors found that use of PETs improves patient outcomes and experiences in the perioperative period. Patients who engage more frequently with PETs have shorter length of stay (LOS) with lower readmission and post-operative complication rates.
  17. Content Article
    In this letter to Health Secretary Steve Brine MP, members of the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Pandemic Response and Recovery raise serious concerns about the approach of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) to patient safety. They outline problems within the MHRA that continue to put patients at serious risk of harm. The letter also highlights the role of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review (IMMDS), in its thorough investigation of Primodos, sodium valproate and pelvic mesh in bringing some of these concerns to the fore. It points to recent evidence presented to the APPG that indicates that the MHRA is at the heart of wider endemic failings, with issues uncovered so far being "the tip of a sizeable iceberg of failure." The letter outlines concerns about the following areas: The Yellow Card Scheme Conflicts of interest and transparency History of regulatory failures in the MHRA It calls on the Health and Social Care Select Committee to investigate these issues and make recommendations to the government on: legislative changes as to who is obligated to report adverse drug reactions. funding changes to the MHRA. separation of regulatory approval duties from post marketing pharmacovigilance. more inclusion of patients. greater transparency across the board. proper enforcement of Part 14 of the Human Medicines Regulations 2012.
  18. Content Article
    As the Cumberlege Review and Paterson Inquiry made clear, having accurate and timely data on treatments and outcomes is critical to patient safety. NHS England is working to strengthen this data by implementing a central database to collect key details of implantable devices at the time of operation. The new Outcomes and Registry Platform will bring existing registries together for the first time and introduce new registries. In a blog for the Patient Safety Commissioner website, Scott Pryde, Programme Director for NHS England’s Outcomes and Registries Programme, and Katherine Wilson, Clinical Steering Group Chair of the programme, discuss the new National Registry of Hearing Implants, a registry specifically for cochlear implants. They highlight the importance of collaboration between patients, clinicians, regulators and medical device manufacturers.
  19. News Article
    The head of the NHS has today announced the rollout of ‘Martha’s Rule’ in hospitals across England from April, enabling patients and families to seek an urgent review if their condition deteriorates. The patient safety initiative is set to be rolled out to at least 100 NHS sites and will give patients and their families round-the-clock access to a rapid review from an independent critical care team if they are worried about their or a loved one’s condition. This escalation process will be available 24/7 to patients, families and NHS staff, and will be advertised throughout hospitals, making it quickly and easily accessible. NHS chief Amanda Pritchard said the programme had the potential to “save many lives in the future” and thanked Martha’s family for their important campaigning and collaboration to help the NHS improve the care of patients experiencing acute deterioration. Thirteen-year-old Martha Mills died from sepsis at King’s College Hospital, London, in 2021, due to a failure to escalate her to intensive care and after her family’s concerns about her deteriorating condition were not responded to promptly. Extensive campaigning by her parents Merope and Paul, supported by the cross-party think tank Demos, has seen widespread support for a single system that allows patients or their families to trigger an urgent clinical review from a different team in the hospital if the patient’s condition is rapidly worsening and they feel they are not getting the care they need. Merope Mills and Paul Laity, Martha’s parents, said: “We are pleased that the implementation of Martha’s Rule will begin in April. We want it to be in place as quickly and as widely as possible, to prevent what happened to our daughter from happening to other patients in hospital. “We believe Martha’s Rule will save lives. In cases of deterioration, families and carers by the bedside can be aware of changes busy clinicians can’t; their knowledge should be recognised as a resource. We also look to Martha’s Rule to alter medical culture: to give patients a little more power, to encourage listening on the part of medical professionals, and to normalise the idea that even the grandest of doctors should welcome being challenged. We call on all NHS clinicians to back the initiative: we know that the large majority do listen, are open with patients and never complacent – but Martha’s doctors worked in a different culture, so some situations need to change. “Our daughter was quite something: fun and determined, with a vast appetite for life and so many plans and ambitions – we’ll never know what she would have achieved with all her talents. Hers was a preventable death, but Martha’s Rule will mean that she didn’t die completely in vain.” Read full story Source: NHS England, 21 February 2024
  20. Content Article
    On the 7 February 2024, the Patient Safety Commissioner for England published a report considering options for redress for those who have been harmed by two of the interventions covered by the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review: sodium valproate and pelvic mesh. In this blog, Patient Safety Learning sets out the background to this report, outlines responses from patient groups and campaigners, and reflects on how this work will be taken forward.
  21. Community Post
    It's rare that I post personal information of any kind on a website such as this, but this really irked me so felt it was worth sharing. Context: I've been an Asthma sufferer since the age of 3 years old. I know exactly how to manage my condition having had it for over 50 years, and have always used a blue ventolin inhaler as and when necessary (perhaps once every 2-3 months). I have not had any serious issues with my Asthma for at least 20 years, and then only in Hayfever season. Issue: I only renew my inhaler when it expires, every 2 years or so. Therefore it is not listed on my repeat medications list. My most recent one had just run out, so I needed a replacement. Action: I emailed the GP's website as I knew I was meant to, and received an automated email back saying that I would receive a response within 5 working days. So far so good. Response: I received another email response 2 days later (pretty good!) saying that the GP would have to call me to run through why I needed a new inhaler. GP call: The GP rang on the set day and within the allocated time window and started asking me how often I used the inhaler, for what, and did I really need that or the preventative one (which I've had before). At the end of our 10 minute call, she agreed that I just needed a replacement blue ventolin inhaler, as I had asked for in the first place. What a waste of the GP's time, and mine!! It made me think that it would be a helpful thing if certain patients with decades of experience in managing their condition(s) in a very stable way could be classed as 'expert patients' on their GP record. This could save a huge amount of wasted time on both sides!! This blog post first appeared on Linkedin on 30 October 2022. I will post some of the responses to it below for added insight.
  22. Content Article
    Risks and statistics are an essential part of patient information. What is a person’s risk of developing a particular condition in their lifetime, or of having a certain symptom if they have that condition? What are the risk factors for a disease, and can people change these? What is the chance of a treatment or procedure working? And what is the risk of getting the different side-effects and complications that can come with it? Many patients are unable to comprehend basic statistics, never mind navigate their way through the reams of data that may come with health information to compare treatment options. As information producers, our job is to make sure we can guide patients through the minefield of data and figures to help them feel confident in making their own decisions. This guide from the Patient Information Forum highlights a range of approaches and tools for unbiased communication.  This resource covers the following topics: illustrating risk, perceptions of risk, know your numbers, explaining uncertainty, useful resources and references.
  23. Content Article
    An action-oriented and radically hopeful field guide to the underground, patient-led revolution for better health and healthcare. Anyone who has fallen off the conveyer belt of mainstream health care and into the shadowy corners of illness knows what a dark place it is to land. Where is the infrastructure, the information, the guidance? What should you do next? In Rebel Health, Susannah Fox draws on twenty years of tracking the expert networks of patients, survivors, and caregivers who have come of age between the cracks of the health care system to offer a way forward. Covering everything from diabetes to ALS to Moebius Syndrome to chronic disease management, Fox taps into the wisdom of these individuals, learns their ways, and fuels the rebel alliance that is building up our collective capacity for better health. Rebel Health shows how the next wave of health innovation will come from the front lines of this patient-led revolution. Fox identifies and describes four archetypes of this revolution: seekers, networkers, solvers, and champions. Each chapter includes tips, such as picking a proxy to help you navigate the relevant online communities, or learning how to pitch new ideas to investors and partners or new treatments to the FDA. On a personal level, anyone who wants to navigate the health care maze faster will want to become a health rebel or recruit some to their team. On a systemic level, it is a competitive advantage for businesses, governments, and organizations to understand and leverage the power of connection among patients, survivors, and caregivers.
  24. Content Article
    NHS England’s Worry and Concern Collaborative is looking into how hospitals can make sure the worries and concerns of patients, their family and friends about a patient in hospital are taken into account by doctors, nurses and other health professionals.  This webinar, hosted by the Patients Association explored: The role of the National Worry and Concern Collaborative and its seven pilot sites the experiences of both clinicians and patients how these services need to be designed and delivered.
  25. Content Article
    We all have a right to receive information about our own health in a way we can understand. There is no excuse for poor-quality, inaccessible, information that excludes people. In this blog I will consider how these needs can be met and the implications for patient safety if they are not. I have written about accessible information in the past but in this blog, I will dig deeper into some specifics, namely: Special educational needs, learning difficulties and disabilities. Visual and hearing impairments. Dominant language.  If you’re interested in accessible information, I’d strongly recommend you familiarise yourself with the Accessible Information Standard – this is a standard that the NHS and adult social care have to adhere to by law when it comes to communicating with the general public. This blog will give some tips on how you can make sure you meet this standard. 
×
×
  • Create New...