Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Never event'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning campaigns
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
    • Data and insight
    • Research
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Categories

  • Files

Calendars

  • Community Calendar

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


First name


Last name


Country


Join a private group (if appropriate)


About me


Organisation


Role

Found 108 results
  1. News Article
    A new mum was confused for another patient and mistakenly fitted with a contraceptive coil after a C-section. Another patient in north Wales almost had the wrong toe removed during surgery to amputate two others. A third incident happened when a patient, unable to swallow oral medication, had it crushed, mixed with water and administered with a syringe. These so-called "never events" happened at hospitals in the Betsi Cadwaladr health board area in February. In a report into the three incidents in February, Betsi Cadwaladr health board outlined how a patient had a coil - an intrauterine device which prevents pregnancy - inserted after undergoing a Caesarean section. Described in the report as "wrong procedure", it had been planned for a different patient but a mistake had been made after the "list order was changed due to the increase in category for this patient". Another incident, described in the report as "wrong site surgery", described a patient who was due to have their second and third toes amputated. However, an incision was made in their fourth toe by accident. Luckily, the error was spotted and the correct toes were amputated. In the third never event, described as "wrong route", the report details the case of a patient who was unable to swallow oral medication. To administer it, a member of staff crushed it, mixed it with water and "inadvertently" gave it intravenously, according to the report. Read full story Source: BBC News, 28 March 2024
  2. Content Article
    Fear of retaliation by leaders or colleagues can prevent staff from reporting adverse events, unsafe conditions, or near misses. This article presents strategies to improve just culture in the perioperative environment, which is prone to hierarchical structure. Strategies include creating an accessible reporting system, implementation of a "good catch" programme, and leadership support for staff who submit reports.
  3. Content Article
    The National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIPs) 2 are intended to help share learning and best practice to support multidisciplinary teams and organisations to deliver safer care. This two-page summary document, published by the Centre for Perioperative Care, provides a concise overview of NatSSIPs for anyone who does interventional procedures and the teams who support them.
  4. Content Article
    Peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) are safe and effective alternatives or supplements to general anaesthesia. They may improve pain control both during and after surgery, thus avoiding many of the side effects of systemic opioids. PNBs may also lead to improved patient satisfaction, decreased resource utilization, and may be better for the environment by decreasing usage of aesthetic gases and other medications. With the growing use of peripheral nerve blocks in the United States, this paper examines safety issues surrounding the procedures. It examines the safety of nerve blocks as it relates to: nerve injury recognition and treatment of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) appropriate health care professional performance of timeouts to avoid wrong-site blocks.
  5. Content Article
    The NHS England National Patient Safety Team is seeking views on whether the existing Never Events Framework remains an effective mechanism to drive patient safety improvement. The consultation runs from the 7 February until the 7 May 2024.
  6. News Article
    Women in labour at a London maternity unit deemed “inadequate” were left alone with unsupervised support workers who were not given any guidance, an NHS safety watchdog has found. In a scathing report of North Middlesex Hospital’s maternity services, the Care Quality Commission also found examples of delays to induction of birth for women, and one case of a woman with a still-born baby who was left waiting for the unit to call her in for an induction. Inspectors have downgraded the maternity unit from “good” to the lowest possible rating “inadequate” following an inspection earlier this year. Staff reportedly told inspectors they felt they were “criticised” or “bullied” when reporting safety incidents within the unit. “We heard that the criticism or bullying was worse if the incident reported was relative to other staff and their perceived behaviours,” the report said. There was also evidence the hospital was not recording the severity of safety incidents correctly for example two “never events”, which are among the highest category incidents, were categorised as “low harm”. Other findings included women and babies came to harm as the hospitals did not follow standards to language interpretation despite covering a higher than average minority ethnic population. Read full story Source: The Independent, 11 December 2023
  7. Content Article
    This investigation explores the patient safety risk of unintended retention of surgical swabs after surgery. Surgical swabs are sterile pieces of gauze which are used to absorb bodily fluids, such as blood, during a surgical procedure. The investigation will: explore the factors associated with unintentional retained surgical swab events identify alternative safety controls to reduce the likelihood of foreign objects being unintentionally retained. The interim report analyses the findings of 31 NHS trust serious incident reports.
  8. News Article
    A teaching trust has reported six ‘never events’ in less than two months, including incidents in a specialty already under review for errors. The incidents occurred at University Hospitals Birmingham between 26 July and 10 September, including two wrong-side lesion biopsies in dermatology, two incorrect blood transfusions, one injection to the incorrect eye, and one misplaced nasogastric tube. The two incorrect blood transfusions involved the same patient at Heartlands Hospital and were reported after a biomedical scientist carried out a retrospective investigation into the case. On both occasions, the patient was transfused with incorrect red blood cells. It brings the total number of blood transfusion events reported at UHB to seven since 2020-21. The issue is already subject to a review by the Royal College of Physicians after Mike Bewick identified concerns in his review of patient safety at the trust. It comes after clinicians working within the haematology specialty raised multiple concerns over patient safety in 2021 and intervention from the General Medical Council over concerns around junior doctors. John Atherton, chair of UHB’s clinical quality and safety committee, told the board a preliminary review into never events had identified that “maybe we weren’t addressing these [incidents] seriously enough”. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 1 December 2023
  9. News Article
    Moving less complex procedures out of operating theatres and into other care settings to free up capacity to support elective recovery has ‘inadvertently’ increased the risk of ‘never events’ at an acute trust, a report has warned. The warning was made in a report into four never events at North Bristol Trust’s Southmead Hospital between November 2022 and January 2023 – two of which involved the same patient. The review was commissioned by Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire integrated care board to examine common issues in never events involving invasive procedures. It found an increase in never events when procedures were moved away from operating theatres to other care settings. The review found moving procedures from theatres to outpatient or day case facilities to “support the reduction in the [elective] backlog and improve the waiting times for patients… may also inadvertently increase the risk of never events”. It added: “It is likely that a theatre environment has more established and embedded safety control mechanisms. Governance processes in moving such procedures should consider the impact on quality, for example, the gaps between safety processes and consideration of the minimum requirements for the new procedure location.” Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 29 November 2023
  10. News Article
    NHS staff are carrying out the equivalent of one 'never-event' every day, figures show. This is despite the Government ordering a crackdown on the mistakes, which cost hospitals an estimated £800million in compensation each year. Experts today demanded further action on 'unacceptable' levels of never-events, blaming inadequate staffing levels and a lack of investment in the NHS. A MailOnline audit of a decade's worth of NHS data found a colossal 4,328 never-events have occurred in England since 2013. This equates to roughly eight a week. Shocking incidents uncovered include women getting parts of their reproductive anatomy cut out instead of an appendix, men getting unwanted circumcisions and laser procedures to the wrong eye. The Royal College of Surgeons said the level of never-events was 'unacceptable' and blamed NHS staffing levels for increasing the risk to patients. "Surgeons will be working hard to do their best for patients, but they do so in difficult circumstances," a spokesperson said. "The NHS is overstretched, with staff shortages, a workforce suffering from burn-out and pressure to get record waiting times down. "This increases the risk of mistakes happening." Read full story Source: MailOnline, 10 October 2023
  11. Content Article
    On Monday 10 July 2023 the Centre for Perioperative Care (CPOC) and Patient Safety Learning jointly hosted a webinar on the new National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures 2 (NatSSIPs 2). This article contains links to video recordings of this webinar.
  12. Content Article
    The extent to which postintensive care unit (ICU) clinics may improve patient safety for those discharged after receiving intensive care remains unclear. This observational cohort study from Karlick et al., conducted at an academic, tertiary care medical centre, used qualitative survey data analysed via conventional content analysis to describe patient safety threats encountered in the post-ICU clinic. For 83 included patients, safety threats were identified for 60 patients resulting in 96 separate safety threats. These were categorised into 7 themes: medication errors (27%); inadequate medical follow-up (25%); inadequate patient support (16%); high-risk behaviours (5%); medical complications (5%); equipment/supplies failures (4%); and other (18%). Of the 96 safety threats, 41% were preventable, 27% ameliorable, and 32% were neither preventable nor ameliorable. Nearly 3 out of 4 patients within a post-ICU clinic had an identifiable safety threat. Medication errors and delayed medical follow-up were the most common safety threats identified; most were either preventable or ameliorable.
  13. Content Article
    The PIT stop (prosthesis/implant timeout) checklist is Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Trust's visual and aid memoir. It was launched to limit 'human error' and thus preventing never events (wrong implant/prosthesis). The four steps cover the intra-operative stages when implants are required. It works by recording what is requested on a small, hand held white board, and works in harness with the NatSSIPs 8, specifically step 5 of the infographic that has been previously developed.
  14. Content Article
    Tony Clarke suffered from a chronic inflammatory skin disease, hidradenitis suppurativa. In September 2020, Tony underwent surgery to remove infected tissue on one side of his body. When he entered the operating theatre, Tony’s surgical team first covered part of his body with an alcohol-based solution, to keep the area clean. Then, when the operation began, the surgeons began cutting off the infected tissue using a diathermy pen, a device that targets electrically-induced heat to stop wounds from bleeding. However, shortly into the surgery, disaster struck: heat from the surgical pen had ignited the alcohol on Tony’s body. “But because alcohol burns so hot, no fire was seen,” says Tony, recalling an explanation he later received from the hospital.  “The surgeons were concentrating on the right side of my body. The left side was left burning for about 20 minutes.” For the next four months, Tony travelled back to the hospital every three days, to get his injuries checked and bandages changed. During that time, Tony describes himself as ‘totally disabled.’ In September this year, Tony, as a patient ambassador for prevention of surgical fires, spoke at a conference held in York by the Association for Perioperative Practice (AFPP). There, perioperative practitioners from across the country gathered to listen to Tony’s experience. “I was speaking to lots and lots of different professionals in the medical service and they'd never heard of it [being set on fire during surgery]. It was a rarity for them,” Tony says. Tony’s now working with different health agencies, with the aim of stopping preventable surgical burns entirely.
  15. Content Article
    This paper from Roberts et al. examines the application of the Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) within NHS hospital operating theatres England. The aim of the study, through a combination of open-ended questions, was to solicit specific information including views and opinions from operating theatre experts to establish from how the World Health Organisations (WHO) SSC is being applied, and therefore and why intraoperative ‘Never Events’ continue to occur more than a decade after the SSC was introduced. Participants were from the seven regions identified by NHS England. The intention of this paper is not to establish definitively whether the quantitatively identified themes; including a lack of training and engagement with human factors explains the increased presence of intraoperative ‘Never Events’. However, these themes, when subjected to methodological triangulation with the current literature, do appear consistent, and therefore provide an exploratory approach to inform research intended to improve safety in the operating theatre by informing policy and its application to safe practice ultimately towards quality improvements.
  16. Content Article
    In this blog, After Action Review (AAR) specialist Judy Walker shares an account of a successful AAR that took place amongst a surgical team. The AAR was called after a near-miss where the anaesthetist was prevented from injecting spinal block medication into the wrong side of a patient's spine by an operating department practitioner (ODP). The story demonstrates the benefits of AAR, including accelerated learning, a no-blame approach, flattening staff hierarchy and a significant reduction in the time it takes to investigate an incident.
  17. Content Article
    Can you imagine the distress of going to hospital for an operation and having to return to theatre to have forceps removed because they were left inside your abdomen. Or going in for a left hip operation because of years of agonising pain and waking up to find out they had operated on your good hip. Or having surgery to preserve your ovaries — but they are accidentally removed. Or, worst of all, realising you have had a procedure intended for a different patient. Fanciful stories made up for a TV drama? Sadly not. These were just some of the awful mishaps that occurred in hospitals in England over the space of just ten months. Professor Rob Galloway, writing for the Daily Mail, shares his tips on what patients can you do to protect themselves.
  18. Content Article
    National Education for Scotland research and evaluation work has shown wide variations in the standard of significant event analysis (SEAs) undertaken by frontline healthcare teams. The direct implication is that there are many missed opportunities to learn from and improve the safety of patient care. As a consequence, NES developed a robust educational model to enable clinicians, managers and healthcare teams to submit SEA reports for feedback from trained peer groups.
  19. Content Article
    A Human Factors approach to significant event analysis for more meaningful improvement implementation to minimise the risks of the event happening again. Enhanced SEA is a National Education Scotland innovation (funded by the Health Foundation 2012 SHINE programme) which aims to guide health care teams to apply human factors thinking when performing a significant event analysis, particularly where the event has had an emotional impact on staff involved. Taking this approach will help individual clinicians and care teams to openly, honestly and objectively analyse patient safety incidents, particularly more difficult or sensitive safety cases, by ‘depersonalising’ the incident and searching for deeper, systems-based reasons for why the significant event happened.
  20. Content Article
    In this blog, the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) reflects on the recent publication of the new National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIPs 2) by the Centre for Perioperative Care. It outlines how these standards can help NHS organisations provide safer care and reduce the number of patient safety incidents, including a comment on this from Deinniol Owens, Associate Director of National Investigations at HSIB.
  21. Content Article
    In this article, John Tingle, Assistant Professor at the University of Birmingham Law School, discusses recent developments in patient safety in the context of possible reform of the clinical negligence system in the UK.
  22. Content Article
    The Centre for Perioperative Care (CPOC) has published new safety standards (NatSSIPs2) to enable all hospitals in the UK to improve patient safety by applying a consistent and proportionate set of safety checks for all invasive procedures. Listen to the podcast from the Royal College of Anaesthetists on the new standards.
  23. Event
    Understanding human factors will allow surgical teams to enhance performance, culture and organisation of operating theatres. This one day masterclass will concentrate on human factors within the operating room. This is aimed at all theatre staff. It will look at why things go wrong and how to implement change to prevent it from happening again or mitigate the risks. This Masterclass will focus on systems to improve patient safety as well as looking at never events and how to learn from them using a human factors approach. Key learning objectives: Safety culture Human factors Leadership Never events This masterclass is aimed at all theatre staff. Register hub members receive 20% discount using code hcuk20kh.
  24. Content Article
    In this BMJ opinion piece, Scarlett McNally discusses the revised National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIP2). The original NatSSIPs were designed to prevent “never events”—yet more than 300 occurrences of wrong site surgery, retained objects after procedure, or wrong implant insertion still occur yearly in the UK.  NatSSIP2 brings in safety science and human factors, with expectations for organisations including standardisation, harmonisation, training, and audit. "The biggest danger is if the new standards sit on the shelf. With their benefits for patient safety and teamworking, we must accept the repetitive elements and consistently apply these new standards, every time, in every department", writes Scarlett.
×
×
  • Create New...