Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Information sharing'.
Found 321 results
-
Content ArticleThis systematic review in The Journal of Advanced Nursing aimed to synthesise current knowledge about the impact of safety briefings on improving patient safety. The authors found that safety briefings achieved beneficial outcomes and can improve safety culture. Beneficial outcomes included: improved risk identification. reduced falls. enhanced relationships. increased incident reporting. ability to voice concerns. reduced length of stay.
-
Content ArticleA Patient Safety Huddle is a brief multidisciplinary daily meeting held to discuss threats to patient safety and actions to mitigate risk. This evaluation of The Huddle Up for Safer Healthcare (HUSH) project in BMC Health Services Research aims to assess the impact on teamwork and safety culture of the project, which implemented PSHs in 92 wards at five hospitals, across three NHS Trusts. This paper also seeks to add to the evidence-base around huddles as a mechanism for improving safety.
-
Content ArticleThis blog by consultancy firm Gallup highlights seven questions leaders should ask to about their huddles, to ensure they are effective in improving patient safety and preventing staff burnout.
-
Content ArticleThis short article describes how maternity and neonatal teams across Herefordshire and Worcestershire Local Maternity and Neonatal System (LMNS) have been using video conferencing technology to drive safety improvements for mothers and babies, thanks to the launch of their new daily digital safety huddles.
-
Content ArticleThis systematic review in BMJ Quality & Safety looks at existing research into the impact of hospital-based safety huddles. The authors found that while there are many anecdotal accounts of successful huddle programmes, there is not yet much high-quality peer-reviewed evidence regarding the effectiveness of hospital-based safety huddles. They suggest that additional rigorous research is needed to enhance collective understanding of how huddles impact patient safety and other outcomes. The review proposes a taxonomy and standardised reporting measures for future studies, to enhance comparability and evidence quality.
-
Content Article
Evaluation of huddles: a multisite study (1 July 2017)
Patient-Safety-Learning posted an article in Techniques
This article in The Health Care Manager examines the value of 'huddles' - regular, interdisciplinary group meetings - in improving communication among disciplines, resolving problems and sharing information. The authors found that the primary function of huddles was the exchange of information that posed or had the potential to pose safety risks to patients. Staff reported that huddles were useful in improving awareness of safety concerns and also improved communication between disciplines. -
Content ArticleToo often in healthcare, when effective solutions to prevent avoidable harm are found, there is a lack of means to share these more widely. This gap between learning and implementation means that while we may we know what improves patient safety, this information can often remain siloed in specific organisations and health care systems. This results in patients continuing to experience harm from problems that have already been addressed by others. This article published in the Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management describes how the charity Patient Safety Learning created the hub, a platform to encourage and support shared learning for patient safety. Designed by and for patient safety professionals, clinicians and patients, the hub offers a powerful combination of tools, resources, stories, ideas, case studies and good practice to anyone who wants to make care safer for patients.
-
Content ArticlePatients and their families are usually the first to notice new or changing symptoms and they can play an important role in preventing diagnostic errors. This blog in BMJ Opinion describes how researchers, healthcare professionals and patients worked together to develop OurDX, an online tool designed to improve the efficiency of medical appointments and reduce diagnostic errors.
-
Content ArticleLegal expert David Reissner runs through new guidance recommending the appointment of Caldicott Guardians, who are responsible for advising organisations on the ways they hold and process confidential patient information.
-
Content ArticleA paper from Sidney Dekker et al. describing a previously unlabelled and under-theorised problem in safety management – ‘safety clutter’.
-
Content ArticleIn my tweets and posts I have suggested that patients themselves need to take more responsibility for the medicines they are prescribed. But what about vulnerable groups who may depend on decisions being made for them, and in their best interests? Whilst there are circumstances where antipsychotic (psychotropic) medicines are an appropriate option for people with autism and learning disabilities, these occasions are limited. In all cases the patient matters most, and any decision to prescribe must be part of a team based, patient-led decision, which is regularly reviewed.
-
Content ArticleRichard Armstrong, head of health registries for Northgate Public Services, explains why collecting more data is not a cure-all in a health crisis.
-
Content Article
.png.87eec759da0e5059941ea9b3bb4306f4.png)
Did you know unsafe care is one of the ten leading causes of death and disability worldwide?[1] Or that it is estimated this leads to 11,000 avoidable deaths per year in the UK?[2] At Patient Safety Learning our vision is for a world where patients are free from avoidable harm. We want to bring people together, to harness the knowledge, enthusiasm and commitment of healthcare organisations, professionals and patients, for system-wide change. That's why we created our patient safety platform - the hub. Find out more about the benefits and how you can join… -
Content Article
The Perfect Patient Information Journey (PPIJ) is a 7-step process to embed high-quality patient information along care pathways, helping people get the right information at the right time. This video from the Patient Information Forum (PIF), explains why this is so important and how it can improve patient outcomes and safety. -
Content ArticleSurgical morbidity and mortality (M&M) meetings have a central function in supporting services to achieve and maintain high standards of care. Throughout the UK, practices provides advice on the following topics: around the structure and content of M&M meetings vary widely and so does their quality. According to Good Surgical Practice, all surgeons should regularly attend morbidity and mortality meetings as a key activity for reviewing the performance of the surgical team and ensuring quality.
-
Content ArticleIn a recent survey, the Patient Information Forum asked women how to make information on induction better. Here presented in poster form are the top 5 suggestions from an analysis of 1,200 comments. Read full survey results here.
-
Content Article
The 12 days of digital patient safety
Clive Flashman posted an article in Digital health and care service provision
A couple of weeks ago, I presented some of the ideas I’ve had around digital clinical safety. This was seasonally branded, ‘The 12 days of Digital Patient Safety’. The 12 issues that were on my list comprised: AI – regulation, ethics and testing. Patient safety not built into the innovation process (co-design and co-production with patients is required). Patient safety (in use) not effectively built into the digital health compliance systems. Poor user experience (design). The safety of medical devices, e.g. remote hacking. Privacy and consent around data. Fragmentation of patient records and data. Lack of interoperability. Cybersecurity. Patient digital and health literacy. Clinician attitudes and knowledge of digital technologies. The barriers to EHR integration (and poor use of patient-generated data). There was only time on the webinar to cover points 2, 3, 6 and 10; I hope that we can have further session in 2022 where we can discuss the others. -
Content Article
.png.38e124dbc4d893cebb5b01f281b93bce.png)
The Office for National Statistics estimates that in December 2021, 1.2 million people in the UK were living with Long Covid. Long Covid is a condition characterised by ongoing symptoms that last for months and even years after an initial Covid-19 infection. It is a difficult condition to diagnose, and nearly two years since it was first seen, medical understanding of Long Covid is still limited. People living with Long Covid often express frustration at misconceptions about the condition that are prevalent amongst medical professionals, policy makers and the general public. In this article, we highlight some of these myths, explain why they are inaccurate and describe the damage they can cause to people living with the condition. -
Content ArticleWomen are entitled to clear information on the risks and benefits of different options in order to make informed decisions about the birth of their babies. Rates of induction are rising. One in three pregnancies is induced in Great Britain, according to most recent data. Earlier this year Patient Information Fortum (PIF) members raised concerns about availability of information to support decision-making on induction of labour. PIF responded by collaborating on a survey with maternity charities including Tommy’s, Bliss and Birthrights. The results are sobering and show there is much to do to put personalised care and shared decision making into practice in maternity care.
-
Content Article
ABPI: What is legitimate interests? (9 December 2021)
Patient-Safety-Learning posted an article in Good practice
Disclosure UK is the Database on which all pharmaceutical companies abiding by the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) Code of Practice must disclose ‘transfers of value’ to healthcare professionals, other relevant decision makers and healthcare organisations in the UK. Where possible, companies do this by naming the individuals and organisations and according to GDPR law, companies must identify an appropriate lawful basis before they process an individual's information. This guidance document by the ABPI is aimed at pharmaceutical companies using Disclosure UK. It explains and promotes the choice of the basis of 'legitimate interests' for disclosure, with the aim of increasing transparency in the relationships between healthcare professionals, other relevant decision-makers and the industry. -
Content ArticleThe Health System Response Monitor (HSRM) has been designed in response to the COVID-19 outbreak to collect and organise up-to-date information on how countries are responding to the crisis. It focuses primarily on the responses of health systems but also captures wider public health initiatives. This is a joint undertaking of the WHO Regional Office for Europe, the European Commission, and the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.
-
Content ArticleThis article in The BMJ discusses the consequences for practising doctors of the 2015 Montgomery v Lanarkshire Case. The case was brought by Nadine Montgomery, a woman with diabetes and of small stature, after she delivered her son vaginally and experienced complications during the birth which resulted in her son having cerebal palsy. Her obstetrician had not disclosed the increased risk of this complication in vaginal delivery, despite Montgomery asking if the baby’s size was a potential problem. The Supreme Court ruling in her favour established that a patient should be told whatever they want to know, not what the doctor thinks they should be told.
-
Content ArticleDiagnosis lies at the heart of the medical encounter, yet it has received much less attention than treatment. It is widely assumed that negligent diagnosis claims should be governed by the Bolam test, but in this paper, Liddell et al. demonstrate that this is not always the case.
-
Content ArticleDr Nick Woodier, HSIB National Investigator, reflects on the challenges associated with joint surgical care of patients and shares learning that can aid the NHS and the private sector as new national agreements come into force.
-
EventuntilIn a networked world, passionate and relatable voices are the ones that help ideas to travel furthest and fastest. Individual influencers are rapidly reshaping public health conversations–not only in terms of who is listened to, but also in terms of the issues discussed. With half the world’s population actively using social media and 41% of Brits using social channels for news (Ofcom, 2022), identifying the most effective ambassadors, advocates and platforms is essential. In this session, speakers from YouTube Health and MHP Group will be joined by an ABPI Code expert and leading content creator and doctor. This expert panel will offer unique perspectives from across channel, content creation and compliance spheres. They will share real-world examples of how to use video to drive engagement and provide insight into supercharging your next campaign. The event will explore: The growing role of video to deliver information in the health space How to identify the right messengers and platforms to create impactful health content that drives change The different methods for reaching your target audience, including how to leverage content creators How to create and deliver content that adheres to the pharmaceutical industry regulations and compliance And more! The panel will also share useful tips and ideas to create impactful video content. Sign up for the event
.png.87eec759da0e5059941ea9b3bb4306f4.png)
.png.38e124dbc4d893cebb5b01f281b93bce.png)
