Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Feedback'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning campaigns
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
    • Data and insight
    • Research
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Categories

  • Files

Calendars

  • Community Calendar

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


First name


Last name


Country


Join a private group (if appropriate)


About me


Organisation


Role

Found 241 results
  1. Content Article
    A film about why Schwartz Rounds are needed.
  2. Content Article
    Hundreds of healthcare organisations around the world are Schwartz Center healthcare members and conduct Schwartz Rounds® to bring doctors, nurses and other caregivers together to discuss the social and emotional side of caring for patients and families. This video explains more.
  3. Content Article
    Attached is a list of research papers on Schwartz rounds that you might find useful.
  4. Content Article
    Providing high quality healthcare has an emotional impact on staff. Often they experience high levels of psychological distress, face increasing levels of scrutiny, regulation and demand, and have increasingly limited resources. Schwartz Center Rounds® (Rounds) were developed to support healthcare staff deliver compassionate care by providing a safe space where staff could openly share and reflect on the emotional, social and ethical challenges of their work. Rounds are a monthly staff forum (not attended by patients) where three to four employees (panellists) present short accounts of their experiences of delivering patient care. This organisational guide is based upon the findings from an evaluation of Rounds in the UK, undertaken between 2014 and 2016. The evaluation was commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research and led by Professor Jill Maben at King’s College London (now at the University of Surrey). The evaluation aimed to distil the findings and learning for practical application by organisations seeking to implement and/or sustain Rounds in their organisations.
  5. Content Article
    A glimpse of moving and powerful Rounds discussions that took place at the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and at Emerson Hospital in Concord, MA, USA
  6. Content Article
    This blog looks at how positive reporting of good practice and success can help support health systems and organisations in their journey to become highly reliable and improve patient safety. This is part of a joint series of blogs and video conversations exploring how we can improve patient safety through the application of principles of high reliability in healthcare, made collaboratively by Patient Safety Learning and RLDatix. 
  7. Content Article
    At the first Patient Safety Management Network (PSMN)* meeting of 2022, we were privileged to hear from a bereaved relative about her shocking experience, which reminded us all of why we do what we do.  Claire Cox, one of the PSMN founders, invited Susan (not her real name to protect her confidentiality) to share with us the causes of her relative’s untimely death and the poor and shameful experience when she and her GP started to ask questions. This kicked off a valuable and insightful discussion about how patients are responded to when things go wrong and about honesty and blame, patient and family engagement in decision making when patients are terminally ill, and how we need to ensure that the new Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) guidance embeds good practice informed by the real-life experience of patients and staff.
  8. Content Article
    In this blog, Patient Safety Learning’s hub Editor, Samantha Warne, summarises a recent Patient Safety Management Network (PSMN) session she joined to hear from James Munro, Chief Executive of Care Opinion, about how patients are using Care Opinion to share their experiences and how Trusts are using the feedback.
  9. Content Article
    In this opinion piece for The New York Times, David Brooks looks at the value of being 'at the edge of the inside'. He argues that being within an organisation, but not so close to the centre that you are subsumed by the 'group think', puts an individual in a good position to positively influence the organisation's culture and practice.
  10. Content Article
    Quality improvement initiatives take many forms, from the creation of standards for health professionals, health technologies and health facilities, to audit and feedback, and from fostering a patient safety culture to public reporting and paying for quality. For policymakers who struggle to decide which initiatives to prioritise for investment, understanding the potential of different quality strategies in their unique settings is key. This volume, developed by the Observatory together with OECD, provides an overall conceptual framework for understanding and applying strategies aimed at improving quality of care. Crucially, it summarises available evidence on different quality strategies and provides recommendations for their implementation. This book is intended to help policy-makers to understand concepts of quality and to support them to evaluate single strategies and combinations of strategies.
  11. Content Article
    In this opinion piece for the BMJ, David Oliver, a consultant in geriatrics and acute general medicine, draws lessons from the Grenfell Tower disaster and subsequent public inquiry. 72 people lost their lives in the fire that destroyed Grenfell Tower in 2017. Evidence to the public inquiry has shown that several residents had raised concerns about the building's safety over many years, and that architects, building contractors, and providers and fitters of cladding material had also expressed concerns about the safety of the exterior cladding used on Grenfell Tower. David Oliver highlights that had these concerns been listened to and acted on, the disaster could have been avoided and many lives saved. He draws parallels with concerns being raised by patients about the safety of the healthcare system and highlights the role of staff in repeatedly raising and keeping a record of concerns. He states that NHS leaders must create a culture where no one is afraid to speak out and act to mitigate safety issues. Leaders must expect to be held accountable for their response - or lack of response - to safety issues raised.
  12. Event
    until
    The Health Research Authority is running its first ever research transparency week. They believe that keeping participants updated and informed as a study develops, as well as with the results at the end, should be the norm. When researchers work with patients and the public to plan individual studies, we hear that recruitment is easier, participants are better supported, and findings are more relevant to patient needs. Ongoing communication between researchers and participants throughout a study can offer further improvements. This strengthens relationships, and creates more opportunities for feedback and improvements to be made in the way findings are shared. This will be a two-hour online workshop, chaired by the co-Chairs of the Make it Public campaign group, Matt Westmore, Chief Executive of the HRA, and Derek Stewart, public contributor. The objective for attendees of this workshop will be to work together in facilitated small groups to explore this theme, and produce a set of 'top tips' to support best practice for those active in research. There will also be a short panel discussion, where attendees can hear directly from the study leads and research participants of studies working creatively and progressively in this area: UCL Covid-19 Social Study The INHALE Project Covid Voices Register for the workshop
  13. Event
    until
    In this research chat, Care Opinion welcomes back Dr Lauren Ramsey of Leeds University to discuss her recent paper: Exploring the sociocultural contexts in which healthcare staff respond to and use online patient feedback in practice: In-depth case studies of three NHS Trusts. Research chats are informal and friendly and last 30 minutes. For the first 15 minutes, Care Opinion CEO James Munro discusses the paper with Lauren and then invite comments and questions via the chat box (or in person if you prefer!). Anyone can come along—you don't need to be academic and you don't even need to read the paper beforehand. So do join us! Register
  14. Event
    Frontline staff often perceive event reporting as a black hole where no information exits once it enters. Join Andy Moyer, BSN, RN-BC, patient safety informatics specialist at Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, where he will help you tackle this perception by providing reporters better feedback. Moyer will also demonstrate ways to increase the quantity and quality of reported events. Register
  15. Event
    This conference will focus on measuring, understanding and acting on patient experience insight, and demonstrating responsiveness to that insight to ensure patient feedback is translated into quality improvement and assurance. Through national updates and case study presentations the conference will support you to measure, monitor and improve patient experience in your service, and ensure that insight leads to quality improvement. For further information and to book your place visit https://www.healthcareconferencesuk.co.uk/conferences-masterclasses/patient-experience-insight or email nicki@hc-uk.org.uk hub members receive 20% discount. Email info@pslhub.org for discount code. Follow on Twitter @HCUK_Clare #PatientExp
  16. Event
    until
    This participatory event, concerning research undertaken on patient safety, will consist of a 45 minute talk followed by a Q&A/interactive discussion about how hospital care can be improved and how the public can be empowered to be involved in their care. The talk will specifically draw upon Dr Elizabeth Sutton's recent research, which explored how patients understood patient safety, and how this affected the ways that they were involved in their care when hospitalised. The Head of Patient Safety at University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust will be participating in the event and there will be a screening of an animated video based upon Dr Sutton's research on patient perceptions and experiences of involvement in their safety. What’s it about? We are all likely to receive hospital care at some point in our lives or have relatives who have experienced hospital care. This makes it vitally important that we are well informed about what patients experience when hospitalised and how best to improve that care. This event aims to highlight what patient safety means to patients, why it matters and to find ways of empowering the public to be involved in their hospital care. I want to find out whether these experiences resonate with you. How could patient safety be improved? What would you like to see happen? How can we best help patients to speak up about their care when hospitalised? As an attendee, you will hear about research on this topic and have the opportunity to ask questions and put across your point of view. This event will be led by Dr Elizabeth Sutton, Research Associate, University of Leicester. It will be of particular interest to anyone who has experience of hospital care or whose relative has received hospital care and patient groups. Book a place a the event
  17. Event
    until
    This participatory event, concerning research undertaken on patient safety, will consist of a 45 minute talk followed by a Q&A/interactive discussion about how hospital care can be improved and how the public can be empowered to be involved in their care. The talk will specifically draw upon Dr Elizabeth Sutton's recent research, which explored how patients understood patient safety, and how this affected the ways that they were involved in their care when hospitalised. The Head of Patient Safety at University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust will be participating in the event and there will be a screening of an animated video based upon Dr Sutton's research on patient perceptions and experiences of involvement in their safety. What’s it about? We are all likely to receive hospital care at some point in our lives or have relatives who have experienced hospital care. This makes it vitally important that we are well informed about what patients experience when hospitalised and how best to improve that care. This event aims to highlight what patient safety means to patients, why it matters and to find ways of empowering the public to be involved in their hospital care. I want to find out whether these experiences resonate with you. How could patient safety be improved? What would you like to see happen? How can we best help patients to speak up about their care when hospitalised? As an attendee, you will hear about research on this topic and have the opportunity to ask questions and put across your point of view. This event will be led by Dr Elizabeth Sutton, Research Associate, University of Leicester. It will be of particular interest to anyone who has experience of hospital care or whose relative has received hospital care and patient groups. Book a place a the event
  18. Community Post
    I've been searching for a definition of "Lessons Learned", to inform some internal discussion and a policy review. However, I cannot seem to find one anywhere - I've tried as much NHSI and old NPSA documentation as I can get my hands on, Googled some Trust policies, and done some other searches. The closest I can find is some wording on Knowledge for Healthcare: This seems to be a start, but not necessarily specific to incidents and learning from investigations. I'm also keen to use wording from an organisation which already carries a bit of weight and gravitas, rather than developing our own, if possible. Is anyone aware of anything I might have missed?
  19. Content Article
    The NHS Long Term Workforce Plan 2023 is crucial to the long term sustainability of the health service. The National Centre for Rural Health and Care is concerned that the plan has not been 'rural proofed' and makes very few references to rural issues. They are preparing a response and are looking for views about the plan through this survey. The closing date for responses is 4 August 2023.
  20. Content Article
    In 2020, the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review (IMMDS), chaired by Baroness Cumberlege, highlighted the avoidable harm caused by both pelvic and sodium valproate. It also set out the devastating impact on people’s lives when patients’ voices go unheard. The Minister for Mental Health and Women’s Health Strategy, Maria Caulfield MP, asked the Patient Safety Commissioner (PSC) to explore redress options for those who have been harmed by pelvic mesh and sodium valproate. The work will focus on what a suitable redress scheme for those affected should look like, to meet the needs of those affected. The PSC will publish a public report of this work. Once the project is complete, the Government will consider the report and set out next steps. The project will engage with patients through: meeting patients and their representative organisations. an online survey to gather views, which will be launched in due course.
  21. Content Article
    The UK Covid-19 Inquiry is the independent public inquiry set up to examine the UK’s response to and impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, and learn lessons for the future. In order to fully understand the impact of the pandemic on the UK population, the Inquiry is inviting the public to share their experiences of the pandemic by launching Every Story Matters. It will inform the Inquiry’s work by gathering pandemic experiences which can be brought together and represent the whole of the UK, including those seldom heard. The output of Every Story Matters will be a unique, comprehensive account of the UK population’s experiences of the pandemic, to be submitted to the Inquiry’s legal process as evidence. This toolkit contains information and creative assets that can be used to encourage participation in Every Story Matters. Every Story Matters aims to provide inclusive methods for people to talk about their experience of the pandemic, so anyone that wants to share their story feels heard, valued, and can contribute to the Inquiry.
  22. Content Article
    This strategy sets out how the Care Quality Commission (CQC) will listen, inform and involve people and work in partnership with organisations that represent people. The new strategy will run to 2026 and has four objectives: Build a trusted feedback service where people’s experiences drive improvements in care Create a trusted, accessible public information service designed around people’s expectations and needs Develop an inclusive approach to proactively involving people who use services, their family, carers and organisations that represent or act on their behalf in shaping our plans, policies and products Work in partnership with organisations that represent or act on behalf of people who use services to improve care
  23. Content Article
    In December 2022, Public Policy Projects brought together oncology experts and key stakeholders for a roundtable to discuss how effective partnership working in healthcare environments can reduce health inequalities in breast cancer outcomes. The objective of the roundtable was to create a series of actionable insights and recommendations for health providers to create a more resilient health and care system and, ultimately, improve breast cancer outcomes in the UK. This document is a summary of the key outcomes, insights and recommendations that were generated from the roundtable. It is not an exhaustive report of facilitating and enabling partnerships to tackle health inequalities, but rather a particular view from a group of key sector stakeholders.
  24. Content Article
    HQIP hosts a Service User Network (SUN) for people who are interested in contributing to improving the quality of healthcare services. Anyone with lived experience as a patient or carer is invited to join. The SUN was established in 2009 and has had over 40 patient and carer advocates working in an advisory capacity to HQIP. There is no commitment once you sign up and all opportunities will be shared via a newsletter, To register your interest, complete this form. HQIP will then send you regular updates about projects that you could contribute to.
  25. Content Article
    The Department of Health and Social Care is seeking views and ideas on how to prevent, diagnose, treat and manage the six major groups of health conditions that most affect the population in England. These are: cancers cardiovascular disease, including stroke and diabetes chronic respiratory diseases dementia mental ill health musculoskeletal disorders The views and ideas gathered will inform the priorities and actions in the major conditions strategy. The consultation will close at 11:59pm on 27 June 2023.
×
×
  • Create New...