Jump to content

Search the hub

Showing results for tags 'Feedback'.


More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Start to type the tag you want to use, then select from the list.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • All
    • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Culture
    • Improving patient safety
    • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Leadership for patient safety
    • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Patient engagement
    • Patient safety in health and care
    • Patient Safety Learning
    • Professionalising patient safety
    • Research, data and insight
    • Miscellaneous

Categories

  • Commissioning, service provision and innovation in health and care
    • Commissioning and funding patient safety
    • Digital health and care service provision
    • Health records and plans
    • Innovation programmes in health and care
    • Climate change/sustainability
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    • Blogs
    • Data, research and statistics
    • Frontline insights during the pandemic
    • Good practice and useful resources
    • Guidance
    • Mental health
    • Exit strategies
    • Patient recovery
    • Questions around Government governance
  • Culture
    • Bullying and fear
    • Good practice
    • Occupational health and safety
    • Safety culture programmes
    • Second victim
    • Speak Up Guardians
    • Staff safety
    • Whistle blowing
  • Improving patient safety
    • Clinical governance and audits
    • Design for safety
    • Disasters averted/near misses
    • Equipment and facilities
    • Error traps
    • Health inequalities
    • Human factors (improving human performance in care delivery)
    • Improving systems of care
    • Implementation of improvements
    • International development and humanitarian
    • Safety stories
    • Stories from the front line
    • Workforce and resources
  • Investigations, risk management and legal issues
    • Investigations and complaints
    • Risk management and legal issues
  • Leadership for patient safety
    • Business case for patient safety
    • Boards
    • Clinical leadership
    • Exec teams
    • Inquiries
    • International reports
    • National/Governmental
    • Patient Safety Commissioner
    • Quality and safety reports
    • Techniques
    • Other
  • Organisations linked to patient safety (UK and beyond)
    • Government and ALB direction and guidance
    • International patient safety
    • Regulators and their regulations
  • Patient engagement
    • Consent and privacy
    • Harmed care patient pathways/post-incident pathways
    • How to engage for patient safety
    • Keeping patients safe
    • Patient-centred care
    • Patient Safety Partners
    • Patient stories
  • Patient safety in health and care
    • Care settings
    • Conditions
    • Diagnosis
    • High risk areas
    • Learning disabilities
    • Medication
    • Mental health
    • Men's health
    • Patient management
    • Social care
    • Transitions of care
    • Women's health
  • Patient Safety Learning
    • Patient Safety Learning campaigns
    • Patient Safety Learning documents
    • Patient Safety Standards
    • 2-minute Tuesdays
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Annual Conference 2018
    • Patient Safety Learning Awards 2019
    • Patient Safety Learning Interviews
    • Patient Safety Learning webinars
  • Professionalising patient safety
    • Accreditation for patient safety
    • Competency framework
    • Medical students
    • Patient safety standards
    • Training & education
  • Research, data and insight
    • Data and insight
    • Research
  • Miscellaneous

News

  • News

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start
    End

Last updated

  • Start
    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


First name


Last name


Country


Join a private group (if appropriate)


About me


Organisation


Role

Found 246 results
  1. Content Article
    HQIP hosts a Service User Network (SUN) for people who are interested in contributing to improving the quality of healthcare services. Anyone with lived experience as a patient or carer is invited to join. The SUN was established in 2009 and has had over 40 patient and carer advocates working in an advisory capacity to HQIP. There is no commitment once you sign up and all opportunities will be shared via a newsletter, To register your interest, complete this form. HQIP will then send you regular updates about projects that you could contribute to.
  2. Content Article
    In this blog, Becki Meakin, Involvement Manager with Shaping Our Lives, a non-profit making user-led organisation that enables individuals to have a stronger voice, writes about why all patients should think about speaking up about their health experiences. She talks about the difference sharing your story can make, and how to get started.
  3. Content Article
    The Department of Health and Social Care is seeking views and ideas on how to prevent, diagnose, treat and manage the six major groups of health conditions that most affect the population in England. These are: cancers cardiovascular disease, including stroke and diabetes chronic respiratory diseases dementia mental ill health musculoskeletal disorders The views and ideas gathered will inform the priorities and actions in the major conditions strategy. The consultation will close at 11:59pm on 27 June 2023.
  4. Content Article
    This case study published by The Beryl Institute looks at an initiative to collect real-time feedback on patient experiences at the Stanford Health Care emergency department in California. Previously, the department had sent a survey to patients well after their visit, but the team realised that capturing this information sooner was critical. Matthew Lim, Patient Experience Manager at Stanford Health Care describes the practical and replicable steps the organisation took in implementing a QR code-based feedback system. He describes the results, lessons learned and potential future developments.
  5. Content Article
    The Primary Care Patient Measure of Safety (PC PMOS) is designed to capture patient feedback about the contributing factors to patient safety incidents in primary care. It required further reliability and validity testing to produce a robust tool intended to improve safety in practice. This study led to a reliable and valid 28-item PC PMOS that could enhance or complement current data collection methods used in primary care to identify and prevent error.
  6. Content Article
    Each year, the Joint Commission gathers information about emerging patient safety issues from stakeholders and experts in different fields of healthcare. This information forms the basis of the Commission's National Patient Safety Goals, which are tailored to specific programs.
  7. Content Article
    In this webinar, Jane O'Hara, Professor of Healthcare Quality and Safety at the University of Leeds, outlines how understanding of the role of patients and families in supporting patient safety has developed over the past few years. She highlights the work of the Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group (YQSR) and looks at research demonstrating the role patients and families can play in improving the safety of healthcare systems.
  8. Content Article
    Patient Participation Groups (PPGs) are generally made up of a group of volunteer patients, the practice manager and one or more of the GPs from a practice. PPGs meet on a regular basis to discuss the services on offer, and how improvements can be made for the benefit of patients and the practice. The Patients Association has produced this set of videos and resources for PPGs, including: information on why GP practices and Primary Care Networks need patient groups step-by-step guide to establishing a GP patient group reasons to have a patient group and what’s in it for the GP practice and patients effectively working together in partnership recruitment, increasing diversity and communicating with the wider patient population.
  9. Content Article
    In this podcast, Care Opinion Chief Executive James Munro speaks to Alex Gillespie and Tom Reader of the Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science at LSE about their research paper 'Online patient feedback as a safety valve: An automated language analysis of unnoticed and unresolved safety incidents'. Their research analysed over 146,000 stories on Care Opinion using an automated machine-learning approach. Key findings included: automated analysis can reliably detect patient safety issues reported by patients. online patient safety concerns are associated with hospital level mortality. staff reported patient safety concerns are not associated with hospital level mortality.
  10. Content Article
    In this joint statement, National Voices, a coalition of health and social care charities in England, supported by 82 charities and professional bodies, call on the Government to act on the serious challenges faced by the NHS and social care workforce, which it states are badly impacting upon people’s experience of health and care. Patient Safety Learning is one of the signatories of this statement.
  11. Content Article
    The National Centre for Social Research’s (NatCen’s) British Social Attitudes (BSA) survey has been conducted annually since 1983. Each year the survey asks people what it's like to live in Britain and what they think about how Britain is run, including measuring levels of public satisfaction with the health and care services.  The most recent survey was carried out between 7 September and 30 October 2022 and asked a nationally representative sample (across England, Scotland and Wales) of 3,362 people about their satisfaction with the National Health Service (NHS) and social care services overall, and 1,187 people about their satisfaction with specific NHS services, as well as their views on NHS funding.  This report highlights the key findings of the survey, which was jointly sponsored this year by The King's Fund and the Nuffield Trust.
  12. Content Article
    This is part of our series of Patient Safety Spotlight interviews, where we talk to people working for patient safety about their role and what motivates them. Lesley talks to us about how personal stories enrich our understanding of data, drive real quality improvement and remind us that healthcare is all about people. She also explains how her own personal experience drives her work to improve healthcare experiences for patients and their families.
  13. Content Article
    The Beryl Institute is seeking feedback on its proposed new global experience measure. The aim is to create a simple, clear experience measure set that ensures global accessibility and applicability, and supports tangible action. This survey aims to help the steering group assess the value and importance of their proposed set of questions. They would like to hear the perspectives of: patient, family members and care partners healthcare/experience leaders The survey should take less than five minutes to complete.
  14. Content Article
    This editorial in BMJ Quality & Safety argues that patients' perceptions of their safety should not be dismissed when measuring healthcare safety. The authors argue that a differentiation between ‘feeling safe’, as defined through patient experience, and ‘being safe’, as defined through observation and evaluation using clinical outcomes selected by quality experts, creates a power differential and dynamic that degrades the role and value of patient experiences as valid patient safety indicators.
  15. Content Article
    This report summarises the results of the Patients Association's Winter survey 2023, which received 1,933 online responses. The survey aimed to help develop understanding about the experiences of patients during a period of high pressure for the NHS. In addition to the usual winter pressures, the NHS experienced a backlog of care exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic, alongside years of underinvestment in the NHS, the absence of a long-term workforce plan and long-standing issues in the social care system.
  16. Content Article
    This online course by NHS England helps participants learn how to engage with different people and communities to reduce inequalities and ensure inclusive access to healthcare. It involves three hours of study time per week over two weeks and aims to equip healthcare professionals to: help the people they work with access healthcare services understand how people have different experiences in their access to healthcare explore inclusive engagement activities develop an awareness of implicit bias and underrepresentation
  17. Content Article
    Jill White is the practice manager of the Nightingale Practice and has been using Care Opinion since 2018. The Nightingale Practice signed up as part of the City & Hackney GP Confederation pilot of implementing Care Opinion online feedback as a way of gathering feedback from our patients instead of using paper-based surveys.
  18. Content Article
    How does the public view the state of the health and care service? After political turmoil in Westminster, do people think the Government has the policies to set the NHS on the right course? With the health service under so much strain, do people remain committed to its founding principles? This long read by The Health Foundation presents its analysis of public perceptions research conducted with Ipsos that tracks the public’s views on health and social care in the UK every six months. The survey was conducted via Ipsos’ UK KnowledgePanel between 24 and 30 November 2022, with 2,063 people aged 16 and older across the UK.
  19. Content Article
    Dr Holly Mincher, Paediatric speciality doctor in training, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, shares her experience of being involved with Care Opinion. Care Opinion is a website where anyone can share their experience of health or care services, and help make them better for everyone.
  20. Event
    until
    The Health Research Authority is running its first ever research transparency week. They believe that keeping participants updated and informed as a study develops, as well as with the results at the end, should be the norm. When researchers work with patients and the public to plan individual studies, we hear that recruitment is easier, participants are better supported, and findings are more relevant to patient needs. Ongoing communication between researchers and participants throughout a study can offer further improvements. This strengthens relationships, and creates more opportunities for feedback and improvements to be made in the way findings are shared. This will be a two-hour online workshop, chaired by the co-Chairs of the Make it Public campaign group, Matt Westmore, Chief Executive of the HRA, and Derek Stewart, public contributor. The objective for attendees of this workshop will be to work together in facilitated small groups to explore this theme, and produce a set of 'top tips' to support best practice for those active in research. There will also be a short panel discussion, where attendees can hear directly from the study leads and research participants of studies working creatively and progressively in this area: UCL Covid-19 Social Study The INHALE Project Covid Voices Register for the workshop
  21. Content Article
    A patient participation group (PPG) is a group of people who are patients of a GP surgery and want to help it work as well as it can for patients, doctors and staff. The NHS requires every practice to have a PPG. In this blog, Alan Bellinger reflects on what he has learned during his time as chair of his GP surgery's PPG, highlighting three key lessons: Be collaborative not combative If patients don’t engage with the PPG it’s your fault for not being engaging Never lose sight of the value-add you create for the practice
  22. Content Article
    The Patient Experience Library's patient surveys tracker offers one-click access to the key patient experience datasets for every Trust in England. 
  23. Content Article
    The Healthcare Leadership Model (HLM) was developed to help leaders in the health service become better at their day-to-day role. The model is useful for everyone from board members to managers because it describes the things you can see leaders doing at work and demonstrates how you can develop as a leader. This webpage describes how the HLM works and provides a link to the free self-assessment tool.
  24. Content Article
    The General Practice Data Trust (GPDT) Pilot Study: Report on Patient Focus Groups reports on patients’ attitudes about sharing their health data for research and planning purposes.  It is the result of research by academics at the Centre for Social Ethics and Policy (CSEP) at the University of Manchester, supported by the Patients Association, and is part of the GP Data Trusts pilot project. Funded by the Data Trusts Initiative, the project wanted to understand why so many people opted out from NHS Digital’s GP Data for Research and Planning (GPDPR) programme when it was launched in 2021.    The research found that patients mostly supported the use of patient data in health research, but they often didn’t like the idea that companies might make money from the use of their health data. Many felt they had not been given enough information about the GPDPR programme; some would have been happy to share their data if they had known more about the programme.   The researchers also asked focus group participants if holding patient data in a trust would reassure them about how their data are used. This was welcomed and the report goes into more detail about what patients thought of this idea.  
×
×
  • Create New...