Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Diagnostic error'.
Found 146 results
-
Content ArticleAlcoholism, more professionally termed alcohol use disorder (AUD), is a widespread and costly behavioural health condition. The aims of this paper from Zipperer et al. are draw attention to systemic gaps in care for patients with AUD and advocate for patient safety leaders to partner with both the mainstream medical and substance abuse treatment communities to reduce harm in this patient population.
- Posted
- 1 comment
-
- (and 4 more)
-
Content ArticleJerome Groopman is a doctor who discovered that he needed a doctor. When his hand was hurt, he went to six prominent surgeons and got four different opinions about what was wrong. Groopman was advised to have unnecessary surgery and got a seemingly made-up diagnosis for a nonexistent condition. Groopman, who holds a chair in medicine at Harvard Medical School, eventually found a doctor who helped. But he didn't stop wondering about why those other doctors made the wrong diagnoses. You can listed or read his interview from the link below.
-
Content ArticleThis article outlines the results of a recent investigation by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) which found that a 65-year-old man died after doctors failed to notice serious abnormalities on his X-ray. The patient, known as Mr B, was admitted to University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust in May 2019 after being unwell for several days with abdominal pain and vomiting. An X-ray of his abdomen was taken, which two doctors said did not show any apparent abnormalities. The following day Mr B's condition deteriorated and he suffered a heart attack and died. The PHSO investigation found that the Trust failed to notice a blockage in his intestine on the X-ray. Because of this failure, Mr B did not receive treatment that could have saved his life.
-
Content ArticleThis landmark report from the Leapfrog Group, an independent national healthcare safety watchdog in the US, is the result of an intensive year-long effort bringing together the nation’s leading experts on diagnostic excellence, including physicians, nurses, patients, health plans, and employers. Together, the multi-stakeholder group reviewed the evidence and identified 29 evidence-based actions hospitals can implement now to protect patients from harm or death due to diagnostic errors. Diagnostic errors contribute to 40,000-80,000 deaths a year, with over 250,000 Americans experiencing a diagnostic error in hospitals. This includes delayed, wrong, and missed diagnoses, and those that are not effectively communicated to the patient.
-
Content ArticleThe aim of this study from H R Guly was to describe the injuries misdiagnosed as a sprain of the wrist and to determine the approximate incidence of misdiagnosis in patients diagnosed as having a sprain of the wrist. In total 57 injuries initially diagnosed as a sprained wrist had a different diagnosis (1.76% of all diagnoses of sprained wrists). This is an underestimate of the true incidence of diagnostic error. Forty two per cent of the misdiagnoses were of greenstick or torus fractures of the distal radius. Guly concluded that training for junior doctors in A&E departments should be improved—especially training in radiological interpretation. Other methods of preventing diagnostic errors by misreading of radiographs, for example, more hot reporting of radiographs by radiologists or radiographers should be considered.
-
Content ArticleThis article describes how a radiology group in Arizona allegedly missed dozens of breast malignancies, some of which were obviously cancer. Breast surgeon Dr Beth Dupree and a team of expert radiologists identified 25 missed cancer diagnoses that required either surgery, chemotherapy, radiation or a mastectomy at Northern Arizona Healthcare between 2016 and 2018. The team felt that there was a high chance of the number of women with missed cancers being higher than those uncovered by the review, but their request to expand the investigation did not go ahead.
-
Content ArticleThis article tells the story of Mr K, who died following a misdiagnosis of tension pneumothorax. Mr K was 81 and had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bullous emphysema. He had been diagnosed with a bulla, a large air pocket, in his right lung. The medical team treating Mr K after his admission to hospital with shortness of breath failed to review his previous x-ray and medical notes, and did not involve the respiratory team in his treatment. This led to his misdiagnosis, after which he was fitted with an unnecessary chest drain. The drain collapsed the bulla and ruptured a blood vessel leading to progressive bleeding. The medical team did not recognise their error or Mr K's bleeding and he died two days following the insertion of the drain. At his inquest, the Coroner found that the unnecessary chest drain led to Mr K's death, and that there was a missed opportunity to reassess the situation at a review the next day. They ordered that a prevention of future death report be made as the evidence heard at the inquest revealed a number of matters that gave rise to concern.
-
Content ArticleLearning from mistakes generally is considered the upside to failure. But in healthcare, where staff members regularly face stressors and systemic issues that impede a strong culture of safety, creating that standard can be difficult. To understand why medical mistakes and care complications occur repeatedly Becker's spoke with Patricia McGaffigan, vice president of safety programmes for the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Ms. McGaffigan outlined three factors that contribute to repeat medical errors, care complications or lost progress on quality improvement initiatives: A "whack-a-mole" approach to safety. Lack of focus on systemwide changes. Unhealthy or unsafe work environments.
-
Content ArticleThe Brain Charity has launched a survey that looks into delayed and misdiagnosis of neurological conditions, with the hope that the findings will help improve the issues people with neurological conditions can face when seeking a diagnosis. The survey is open to anyone who has a neurological condition, or to family members who can complete the survey on a patient’s behalf. Follow the link below to find out more about the survey and to complete it.
-
Content ArticleAt the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, demand on the NHS 111 system exceeded capacity and only around half of calls were answered during that time. This investigation by the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) aimed to support improvements in the delivery of NHS 111 and other telephone triage services during a national healthcare emergency. HSIB first identified a potential safety risk associated with NHS 111’s response to callers with Covid-19-related symptoms when concerns were raised through HSIB’s Citizens’ Partnership. The national investigation aimed to understand: the set-up, design and delivery of the Covid-19 telephone triage service accessed by the public by dialling 111 in response to the pandemic. the context and contributory factors influencing the pathway for patients calling NHS 111 with Covid-19-related symptoms. The investigation used four real patient safety incidents involving patients and their families who dialled NHS 111 for advice during the Covid-19 pandemic. All four patients in these reference events—Vincenzo, Ali, Patrick and Dr C—died of Covid-19 having been advised by NHS 111 to stay at home.
-
Content ArticleIn this blog for Psychology Today, Gary Klein looks at the psychological causes of diagnostic errors, arguing that being clear about the exact causes of these errors is the only way to reduce them. Drawing on physical causes of diagnostic error identified in an Institute of Medicine report in 2015, he highlights the need to go further in understanding the explanations the report offers for diagnostic errors.
-
Content ArticleAs we seek to develop a national healthcare system that delivers true 21st century care, we are confronted by a COVID-19 pandemic that has identified numerous challenges. Among the most important: the need to provide correct diagnoses. Definitive answers about diagnosis are critical not only for patients, but also for their families and others around them. Consequential questions gnaw at us: Are we diagnosing COVID-19 correctly? Are we missing cases? How do we know? How can we improve? Gopal Khanna and Jeff Brady are hopeful that some of the changes that have resulted from the US's battle against the pandemic will spark the long-term improvements in diagnostic safety that will strengthen the system’s ability to address COVID-19 and other challenges we face.
-
Content ArticleThe US National Quality Forum (NQF) convened a multistakeholder committee to identify recommendations for the practical application of the Diagnostic Process and Outcomes domain of the 2017 Diagnostic Quality and Safety Measurement Framework, measuring and reducing diagnostic error, and measuring and improving patient safety. This report outlines the recommendations through a series of four Use Cases – missed subtle clinical findings (Use Case 1), communication failures (Use Case 2), information overload (Use Case 3), and dismissed patients (Use Case 4) – that depict resolutions to specific types of diagnostic errors, and broad-scope, comprehensive recommendations with applications to multiple populations and settings.
-
Content ArticleAHRQ PSNet is looking for interesting, provocative cases that illustrate key issues in patient safety such as medication errors, diagnostic errors, and adverse events that either had the potential for or resulted in patient harm. Cases from outpatient, ambulatory surgery, home health, long-term care, and rehabilitation settings are of particular interest. When a case is selected, the editorial team invites an expert author to write a commentary based on the case. Please note that case submitters do not receive any “authorship” because case submissions are anonymous. However, submitters of selected cases will receive a $300 honorarium. The AHRQ Patient Safety Network (PSNet) is a national web-based resource featuring the latest news and essential resources on patient safety.
- Posted
- 1 comment
-
2
-
- (and 4 more)
-
Content ArticleHealth information technology (HIT) provides many benefits, but also facilitates certain types of errors, such as wrong-patient errors in which one patient is mistaken for another. These errors can have serious patient safety consequences and there has been significant effort to mitigate the risk of these errors through national patient safety goals, in-depth research, and the development of safety toolkits. Nonetheless, these errors persist.
-
Content ArticleHealth information technology (HIT) provides many benefits, but also facilitates certain types of errors, such as wrong-patient errors in which one patient is mistaken for another. These errors can have serious patient safety consequences and there has been significant effort to mitigate the risk of these errors through national patient safety goals, in-depth research, and the development of safety toolkits. Nonetheless, these errors persist. Kim et al. analysed 1,189 patient safety event reports using a safety science and resilience engineering approach, which focuses on identifying processes to discover errors before they reach the patient so these processes can be expanded.They analysed the general care processes in which wrong-patient errors occurred, the clinical process step during which the error occurred and was discovered, and whether the error reached the patient. For those errors that reached the patient, they analysed the impact on the patient, and for those that did not reach the patient, they analysed how the error was caught.
-
Content Article
Patient Safety Authority: Diagnostic error
Patient Safety Learning posted an article in Diagnostic error
Diagnosis involves a complex system with many team members and numerous interdependent steps, all of which can make it challenging to identify and learn from failures in the process. The Patient Safety Authority has collated guidelines, resources and educational tools on diagnostic errors. -
Content Article
Medical error prevention (5 May 2020)
Sam posted an article in Good practice
Medical errors are a serious public health problem and a leading cause of death in the United States. It is a difficult problem as it is challenging to uncover a consistent cause of errors and, even if found, to provide a consistent viable solution that minimises the chances of a recurrent event. By recognising untoward events occur, learning from them, and working toward preventing them, patient safety can be improved. Part of the solution is to maintain a culture that works toward recognising safety challenges and implementing viable solutions rather than harboring a culture of blame, shame, and punishment. Healthcare organisations need to establish a culture of safety that focuses on system improvement by viewing medical errors as challenges that must be overcome. All individuals on the healthcare team must play a role in making the provision of healthcare safer for patients and healthcare workers. -
Content ArticleBy understanding how physicians make clinical decisions, and examining how errors due to cognitive biases occur, cognitive bias awareness training and debiasing strategies may be developed to decrease diagnostic errors and patient harm. Studies of the impact of teaching critical thinking skills have mixed results but are limited by methodological problems. The authors of this paper, published in Academic Medicine, argue that explicit instruction in metacognition in medical education, including awareness of cognitive biases, has the potential to reduce diagnostic errors and thus improve patient safety.
-
Content ArticleIn the area of patient safety, recent attention has focused on diagnostic error. The reduction of diagnostic error is an important goal because of its associated morbidity and potential preventability. A critical subset of diagnostic errors arises through cognitive errors, especially those associated with failures in perception, failed heuristics, and biases; collectively, these have been referred to as cognitive dispositions to respond (CDRs). The author of this paper, published by Academic Medicine, provides an extensive list of CDRs and a list of strategies to reduce diagnostic errors.
-
Content ArticleAuthors of this journal piece, published by The American Journal of Medicine, present a comprehensive review of the available literature and current thinking related to diagnostic error. The review covers the incidence and impact of diagnostic error, data on physician overconfidence as a contributing cause of errors, strategies to improve the accuracy of diagnostic decision making, and recommendations for future research.
-
Content ArticleWithin the research community, there is no consensus on the definition of diagnostic error, in part due to the complexity of diagnosis. This paper, published by Diagnosis, looks at the challenges in defining and measuring diagnostic error.
-
Content ArticleAuthors of this editorial, published in BMJ Quality & Safety, discuss the significance of the results of two new studies on hospital medicine and implications for emerging research and practice improvement efforts. The first study was a systematic review to determine the prevalence of harmful diagnostic errors in hospitalised patients. The second studied readmitted patients using established methods for diagnostic error detection and analysis to gain insights into contributing factors. Both studies advance the science of measurement and understanding of how to reduce diagnostic error in hospitals.
-
Content Article
As college students return, a crisis in campus care awaits
lzipperer posted an article in Coronavirus (COVID-19)
Health services in college and university campuses are under pressure to respond to COVID-19 with patient safety in mind. This article from Abelson et al. in The Seattle Times discusses weakness in university health services that undermine their ability to do so. It shares interviews with students that discuss misdiagnosis and diagnostic delays due to the impact of the pandemic. -
Content ArticlePSNet publish a case of a misdiagnosed pelvic mass in a pregnant woman with an accompanying commentary from Leiserowitz and Hedriana discussing the diagnostic errors and the systems change needed.
